CERN and neutrinos

CERN and neutrinos

John Bjarne Grover

The chinese state two-day visit to Austria from 30 october had been preceded by one occurrence of a man stepping out of his car asking me if this were a Kurzparkzone 18-23, followed by an incident of me passing the same place some days later when a female crossed the street and said '18 bis 23' to the family waiting on the same place (altogether 4 people) in the moment when I passed them. I wondered what this was - I asked and it turned out that there was a Kurzparkzone 18-23 there - and later saw the news that the chinese visitors some days later had landed around 1820. Could have been 1823 - which then could point to John Grover 1823 and 1843.

The visitors stayed for one day in Vienna and then went to Salzburg before travelling on to Cannes. The program in Salzburg looked like a menu of all the horrors which take up people's mind and attention and which often cannot be checked out or controlled in advance: The chinese president was offered Guglhupf and Bootfahrt on the Wolfgangsee and they visited a farmer and looked at his Kuh-Muhs etc. It looked like a series of such 'jokes'. When the chinese visitors travelled on to Cannes, it could have looked like a sanction to such programs, but a closer look at the map told that Cannes relates to Andorra approximately like other places to Vienna. Which could mean that plans of making an 'Anustria' by chunking off Tirol just as well could mean an 'Andorra' on the border between east and west. Which could have been a nice program for the guests and the mood they left in Austria - in particular if China had annexed Tibet in such circumstances in 1958 - it served to lift the pressure from many stressing ideas which could be real or not and which people cannot find out of. I mean, you publish something on the internet but cannot know if another page comes up when people click your URL and so forth. Nor can you know if the child you see is sleeping or is in a coma from chemicals. One takes it for granted that it was jokes - it should not mean that this is to be naive. Otherwise it would have looked not so nice to grab the opportunity for some sanctions on difficult programs.

The monthly gray pensions slip did not arrive in October, if I remember right (I have searched for it but do not find it). Could be the gray slip had been forwarded?

On 24 october 2011 I had sent an email to CERN after the news of their documentation of neutrino speed faster than light in the distance from CERN to Gran Sasso at Rome, suggesting that my documentation (discovered around the same time) of a poetic reality in my PEB could be a parallel discovery of the factual existence of this poetic reality through which 'matter' (in some sense of it) can travel - which means that the neutrinos could move through the poetic reality in a leisurely sunday-morning-walk pace from Geneva to Rome and back again in even shorter time than light could need for the same distance through history. Hence there would be no need to proclaim that Einstein was wrong - even if the new data are right. There are not only the two possibilities that either 1) Einstein was wrong or 2) the data are false, but there is in addition the much more self-evident conclusion that 3) there exists at least two forms of 'time' - the historic and the poetic - which proves that the poetic reality exists.

Some time later, around 8-10 november, I tried to look up their website www.cern.ch again and the connection was broken. Later in the same day this article occurred on www.nzz.ch. I tried several times to open the cern page through a couple of days before I went to an internet cafe where it turned out to be in order. On my return to my own computer the connection was still broken and other relevant addresses ending with ...cern.ch were so as well. Hence I do not think that it was my own computer which could not take the size of the page that day - it looked as if a Guglhupf had been imposed on my private internet connection, although I am no computer expert and cannot decide on the impact of possible cookies or what it is called.

On 10 november, it happened again that the lights unmotivatedly went out when I was cooking on my single half-functioning stove. It happened in the moment when I was about to touch the handle of the frying-pan. Later in the day there were at least two significant blackouts in door openings (one with police stepping out of the tram right in front of or next to me). Which could mean, if the frying-pan is no coincidence, either that 1) 'he could not even touch it' or 2) he touched it in the sense of injecting the kuh-muh. Could be more interpretations as well. The electricity blackout could have natural reasons, of course.

The Gran-Sasso CERN collaboration could of course be a case of 'Padre Pio' as an extension from 'pope Pius' from the time of MLR jul 1957. Could be with a turning of the gender. Gran Sasso is reasonably close to the Vatican and the 'padre' there and CERN is the most extraordinary circle one can think of, perhaps even more spectacular than Stonehenge. A new 27 km long circle of expensive hitech is opened in these days - consuming billions of dollars. One must hope that this is not an expensive case of 'zip hitech' for a 'zip hijeck' in terms of the blocking of my internet connection to the place. The ideas immediately start taking shape: Particle physics was founded in the fog chambers of Ernest Rutherford and Niels Bohr = Nil Spor which could suggest that the function was to be a political money-cruncher for monkey business. If so, CERN could be a giant version of the same - and what do we know about such particles really? We know that the Bomb functions and that nuclear reactors give off much heat, but that is a primitive level of knowledge compared with CERN. Could be we know not much more than fantastic conjectures which find an echo from the depths of the matter. Einstein was probably not a Jan Balsrud on Finnmarksvidda (if I remember this story right - I think he had to cut off a toe due to freezing damages when crossing the vast winter plain at WWII), but the other way round could have been a political thing.

Austria left CERN in 2008 for economic reasons (it costs some 20 million per year to be a member).

One must assume that CERN is not only a giant monkey business installation which is more efficient the more money it consumes, on a hitech/hijeck basis (zipping with Italy) for herning teabrew into linkish, with E = MC2 and similars pumped up backwards for filling journal after journal with irrefutable theories with wellsounding political names on the concepts, but I must add that I once talked with an Abercrombie on the phone and he commented on 'putting everything in the hands of Padre Pio' - the saint suffered from stigmas with holes right through his palms.

I hope of course that CERN is not planning to perform a giant-scale Kupp-Aktion hijack of the simple idea I sent to them as an explanation to the apparent paradox on Einstein. (I recall what happened after my letters to a french institution). It must be possible to send a friendly comment on some scholarly matter without having to be taken as an insult against the integrity of the field.

There was another earthquake at Van recently. Cp. the Wannsee conference.

It was in probably early 2010 that I wrote an first analysis of an event I had observed some small handful of years earlier of two dogs finding something - which could be taken to mean 'knew tree nose'. I have never published this piece of writing or shown it to anybody in other ways, but my comptuer can of course be tapped (by a sort of Boot-fahrt etc). The analysis included my own 'Cold Dushion' from 'Encouraged to stay' = TEQ 14 #117 which had a reflex in a letter I got from Norway.

Hopefully the blocking of my internet connection to CERN is not even for forcing me to put yet another document out on the web. Is this web-publishing horror never going to end?

Let me add that I do not believe that the news on neutrino speed need be anything unfavourable for my work - on the contrary, such discoveries in parallel with my PEB could be highly interesting for the philosophical-metaphysical aspects of my TEQ: Indeed this work of mine is precisely about that metaphysics of the poetic reality such as it governs or relates to the historic reality. 'The Dreamer' can be seen to be about the discovery of this poetic reality (some would feel that it is a little hard to get through the wall of historic time, like buddhist monks struggling for years on the cold granite floor apparently without any progress at all, but the book is in its literary form intended to make it possible to experience the nature of the poetic reality behind the wall of historic time), while 'The Endmorgan Quartet' is about the logical aspects of this metaphysics.

Hopefully, the plan is not to hijack this work of mine. I don't know what the secret services could have told CERN and others and what their plans for the future could be.

This part in smaller types added on 21-22 november 2011: In my ABC, I have briefly mentioned the war against the intellectuals, although a full discussion of the problem would take many big volumes. A very telling example is the story of the finnish poet Paavo Haavikko and his 'Winter Palace' (finnish title "Talvipalatsi") from 1959 - it seems that this poetry was so good that the world of politics simply could not take it. The data on the norwegian entertainer Elisabeth Grannemann (known also for her firmness) on internet tells that her career accelerated from 1959 or 1960 onwards, but her authenticity BEFORE Haavikko's poem was evidenced in her brief occurrence in a show by Jens Book-Jensen in 1947. She had also studied piano with Robert Riefling, tells the net. Riefling could be the background of the Anne Orderud Paust case as 'towards riflet rain' (based on Edvard Fliflet Bræin's opera Anne Pedersdotter) and Jens Book-Jensen had a reflex in Jacques Chirac. Grannemann's songs from 59-60 included 'Dear Billy' etc - which perhaps could have been a Hill-Billy of Paavo-Haavo which later got a reflex in Hillary-Bill Clinton. Even the Gifford story from Tucson could have been about the name of Grannemann on the form 'har pissa på et granneland' = 'have pissed on a neighbour country' (would this even have been the Oslo terror some time ago?), and it seems that the world of politics could have used Norway as a prism for 'pissing' on Finland who had made such a good poet. Dirty business, Miss Piggy etc could be a part of this (I am not saying that Grannemann was presented in line with such ideas, but she sometimes joked about her own weight and her 'hits') - and Vladimir Putin could be the reply from the 'granneland' = 'neighbour country' in the east. This year's Nobel in literature is a contemporary and 'neighbour' of Haavikko and lives (and grew up, I think) in a 1-2 reflex of Franz Ferdinand Sarajevo 'Fjellgata 72' on the other side of Söder in Stockholm relative to Sachs in Bergsunds Strand. Gröver/'Mengele' had Albert Engström's collected works in the bookshelf - Engström lived in Fjellgatan on Söder.

The question is now whether CERN-Gran-Sasso is a giant political mill in their detection of 'neutrinos' = 'njut-rin-o's = 'enjoy rinsing o's. Gröver/'Mengele' once talked of an intestine-rinsing institute he sometimes passed and he could hear the shrieks (hvin) out through the open door from clients who enjoyed rinsing o (= 'NEUT-RIN-O'). He also mentioned (could have been around the same time) the story of the two who were driving a motorcycle with sidecar without bottom which forced the passenger to run (around?) rather quickly - an E=MC2 story. This is what I can recognize when I sit in my bathtub and flush with hot water eczema on the inside of the thighs just above the knees and inside the knees - the hot water irritates the eczema and I can understand a possible function of Baader-Meinhof and Brigate Rosse ('bridge at the russia') if this rinsing with hot water is thought of as a WANN-see 'end-lösung' conference. I don't know if this is particularly after I have published another page on the internet.

In short, it could be that the neutrinos are constructed by political intrigue and installed into the CERN-Gran-Sasso structure for making a Black Sea Loop be released from the the Van sea (where there have been some quakes recently) and run around the Black Sea towards Paris. The giant accelerators of CERN could then be about making the LOOP run around - on basis of political exploitation of the finnish poet and his work.

Neutrinos are special in the sense that they go straight ahead through the universe without changing course as long as they last, and they cannot really be detected. Hence it is a sort of ether theory - and it is natural to wonder whether they have a political function only - or if the detection of the '[s]engström' from CERN to Gran Sasso is more than fiction. The giant installations of CERN cost billions of money and make the (possibly 'hillbilly') money run around rather quickly.

It is on this background that I could see the reply to my letter to CERN as being a blocking of the internet connection rather than a normal reply. Science is in a miserable condition. Could be they wanted to tell me that the billions are used for jokes only?

The worst case of possible smear campaign against the finnish poet is perhaps the apparently dirty intrigue on the pope in the Vatican - 'paave haavikke' = norwegian for 'pope we have not', 'we are popeless'. If the series of popes is planned to follow MLR jul 1957, that was BEFORE Haavikko's poem was published and hence it could look like a responsibility claim on the poet as agent. Which clearly would be a dirty smear campaign against the poet and a part of the war against the intellectuals.

The alternative interpretation could be that this very large crusade against a single finnish poet could be launched as a secret reason for the planned progress of popes - which means that the systematic function of MLR jul 1957 could find its official reason there in case the intrigue should come to be discovered by the public and critical journalism. In this way, they could have hoped to keep secret a hypothetical early trauma on my life. This could also be the reason for a 'piggy' association attached to the intrigue - that it be about the GRIS (= pig) of MLR jul 1957 Miscelleaneous notes #3 which also could be the background of the current situation in Greece.

Alternatively, the idea of an early trauma of me could have been constructed for hiding an intrigue on Haavikko. I don't know which obtains, if any of them. I notice 'ulvinne' = 'female wolf', OR 'wolf inside', hence corpus callosum inside the skull, and 'full finne' = 'drunk finn', hence non-circumcized, which means that 'f-ingrid betancourt' means a scissoring of the corpus callosum. Could have been the story from 2002.

The question is whether neutrinos or variants could be a theoretical construction for making it possible to reach scientific results that contradict Einstein. Briefly, if one has a desired mathematical formula which contains political material, one can pump this up backwards to meet certain data which one finds in some suitable database - and by engineering on the bridge between desired theory and data, it is possible to construct a theory which gives support in empirical data to the political formula or theory. British empiricism, that could be called: Locke, Berkeley, Hume - the humourous theory is constructed barkwards for making the lock. If the resulting theory turns out to be optimal for explaining the data, then it is of course a good theory in any case and probably close to truth - in which case it should not be considered pumped up and will not be discarded by history. But if the resulting theory is not really optimal, it will be in need of crutches for functioning, and if these crutches are too elaborate, the construction must eventually be discarded.

But mid way solutions could perhaps be found of constructs which turn out to be surprisingly resistant and can function reasonably well for a long time.

In the case of neutrinos, if it is such a 'backwards theory' (cp. Baader-Meinhof and Brigate Rosse and the 'firmie' Grannemann) - although I must be quick to state that I have not the needed competence to assess the functionality of neutrino theory relative to other theoretic constructs - the crutches could in principle take on the form of theories on extra subatomic particles - or neutrinos could be such theoretic constructs themselves. The effect of this would be that there would be foggy redundancies in the data-theory match which would come to look like attraction between parts of the postulated particles, and this attraction could of course be called 'weak subatomic forces' if the crutches are on the form of extra particles or variants of them. When, as seems to be the case, neutrinos cannot be detected or affected by anything except by such subatomic forces, it follows that they are close to a sort of Münchhausen = Mauthausen theory status - which also means that a successful theory and corroboration by data could serve to prove even that Mao was an agent for England!

I notice that, according to the Wikipedia article on the theme, they used Septentrio's precise "PolaRx2eTR GPS timing receiver" which perhaps could resemble "POLAKK English Clockies" in the sync-kasse.

Neutrinos have socalled 'half-integer spin' which could suggest that they are 'halv-spretta' - have the corpus callosum cut half way through. Some 'gravity' could be needed to detect this. But even if neutrinos should have been constructed for giving empiristic reason to the Klipra connection, it is clear that the question is whether the theories function in the real world. Could be somebody will construct better theories, could be not. If neutrinos are characterized by weak subatomic forces which lend them a quality of self-fulfilling prophesies or even 'poetic logic', weak semantic forces in the logic, that could of course also be about a wish for identifying the political Klipra connection as the same as poetic logic.

I am not saying that CERN or the whole subatomic particle business is a propaganda mill only, or that one has to start from the itchy scratch of Baader-Meinhof and Brigate Rosse for a Black Sea Lupus, but clearly it is difficult for outsiders to have any opinion on that. If neutrinos are such ghostly particles, possibly even constructed for the political purpose of running the 'loop', it is clear that they could function well nevertheless and every part of the theory and experiments and reasoning could be open to public inspection and look goodenough - because nobody wants to start all over from itchy scratch. A whole jungle of particles could develop from such a pumped-up redundancy in the foundations, and this jungle could of course be used for making much politics. Oysters in Hotel Bristol? - But oysters don't bark! There exist three neutrino types - a troika. Beware of dog, troika popless = trå ikke på plenen = do not step on the lawn = do not step on the greek loans. etc etc.

Finally, I add that the reason for the blocking of the CERN address is probably not related to the visit of China, so then it hopefully does not matter that I mention it here.

Added on 29 november 2011:

It can be added that there seems to be a logic which is invoked for a philosophy of overlight speed which could be essential for the 'political' programs: If an 8mm film is projected from a lens of 2 cm breadth towards a bedsheet on the wall of 2 m breadth, then a particle of dust moving over the lens at a speed near the speed of light will throw a shadow on the bedsheet travelling across it with an overlight speed, which means that information can travel faster than light, and this - to the extent that neutrinos are 'semantic' - could of course be the explanation to the neutrino speed. So far so good. The problem is that this presupposes two different realities. If this is the same as Einstein's difference of reference systems, it could be that Einstein goes in the category of jokes - based on the idea that the same math or logic applies to both. Clearly if the lens is God and the bedsheet is the historic reality, it means computing with homemade math on God. This could be the project of administration which aims at controlling the divine authority - such as e.g. in the Vatican. It is likely that this sort of logic - a wish to reach overlight speed for escaping the region around earth - is the background of 'Mengele philosophy' if this attempts to press the souls of the victims down into 'another reality'. It is likely that the only thing which is pressed into another reality - and is hard to get back again - is the conscience of those who do it (and "the conscience of those who do it" could be aspects of other 'political' programs). The trajectory of the Challenger space shuttle disaster could look like a fog chamber trace and I think the astronauts lived and communicated with ground control for days or weeks thereafter before they died from hunger on their lonely way into the endless universe. They could have had a bad conscience on earth? But that is nothing to laugh at.

Clearly this cannot solve any problems and the solution is in a poetic logic which tries to take one step further towards eternity.

One notices the similarity of 'Neutrino' with 'Duino', and the role of the hypothetical bedsheets of the Dead Sea Scrolls which could have the function for Israel which Heimskringla has for Norway. If it was not the young Hitler who had masturbated on the bedsheets, it could of course have been the sheets of young Celan after the family moved to Masarykgasse in Czernowitz in 1935, at his age of 14 or 15 (if his parents were agents). Celan was nearly 30 years younger than Sachs who in principle could have been his mother. There would likely have been a mattress under the bedsheet, cp. the 'white matters' or the corpus callosum.

The Challenger disaster was no Czernowitz, and neither was Cherno-bill.

When I moved into my current home in late 2009, I had no curtains but hung up bedsheets in front of the window where I was sleeping. It was only after some days that I suddenly realized that the worn sheets were not totally un-transparent and I went out to check it from outside. I don't think that one could see more than shadows moving inside, such as me bowing down when undressing, and clearly ordinary surveillance could have seen 'through' the bedsheets however dense they were, but this could nevertheless in theory have been the background of the Oslo terror on the formula "he did not know that the bedsheets were transparent". A vietnamese of name Tran shot into a restaurant queue in Oslo centre some years ago, and 'tran' is norwegian for the cod liver oil produced probably in the north of the country. 'Spa rent' means 'to dig lean'. He did not know that the backstreet was tran-spa-rent = he did not know that Oslo centre was Utøya. (The Norwegian Labour party has its headquarter at Youngstorget in the centre of Oslo). If this is the background, it could be for pretending that I had used semi-transparent bedsheets for sanctioning the Oslo terror on background of e.g. Tran or Jagland and things like that - that is, that I should be an agent. Which I am not.

I add that it happened some months ago that I thought that I saw Vibeke Grøver Aukrust in a nearby window: She seemed to stand there waving her hand apparently to me, but it could be that she was only washing the glass (as most people do now and then). But then again some time later I came with train to Wien Meidling and when I went through the railway station I passed a young female who looked surprisingly similar to like Vibeke Grøver Aukrust in her youth. So clearly there could be 'clones' around. The young on the station came towards me but took swiftly to the right and went down the hall - she did not, for example, turn around to follow me in. I do not remember if these two events were before or after the Oslo terror.

This story of the bedsheets could be about pretending that I was an agent and hence that 'subatomic' aspects of my Endmorgan Quartet (or the PEB) could be due to a 'transparency of the bedsheets' - that is, that I for example had borrowed or got or stolen or whatever the work from somebody else. Which I have not: I am the authentic author of this poetry - and the consistent and coherent overall structure of the work suggests that it is not written on basis of remote control from the central headquarter or TV programming or whatever.

It happened once when I moved away from a place and said goodbye to the neighbour that he was cleaning his spectacle glasses since they seemed to have grown dewy. The hurrying bullets as lightbeams travel through the 'bedsheets' to 'ranga' on the other side. Etc etc.

I once sent a postcard to Yulia Tymoshenko - it was the same as I had sent to Poetry Society in London - with a photo and poem on the front page and my postal address on the back, if I remember right.

Here is the letter I sent to CERN, with a copy to Gran Sasso:

FROM: [own email address]
TO: cern.reception@cern.ch
Monday, October 24, 2011 11:12 AM

To CERN

Neutrino speed

I see there are news on traces of evidence of neutrino speed faster than light - detected by beaming of neutrinos from CERN to Gran Sasso.

It is my theory that Paul Celan is my genetic father and Nelly Sachs my mother. The Celan/Sachs axis clearly is something in political mythos (described on johnbjarnegrover.com/abc.htm) - and it seems to concern me quite much. I seem to be a victim of political abuse in that mythos sense of it. For example, it is not impossible that the earthquake of 23 october 2011 at Van (epicentre between Kozluca, Kolsatan and Csomakli) could relate to two salixes I bought (from 'Bauhaus') for my garden in Zinckgasse in Vienna some days ago, a week I think, in which case it likely could have been about an artificial quake - underearth bombs, quite simply (I have fancied that they are called 'knorrs' in security jargon). The disastrous grand Izmit quake of 1999 seems to have been exactly one month after the falldown of Kennedy jr. Hopefully, a quake such as the one at the Van Sea yesterday is not for the construction of a Black Sea Loop of terror planned since the Wannsee conference of WWII.

I do not know to what extent the CERN-Sasso axis could have been established as a part of such political mythos-making (on basis of Celan-Sachs). If it were, then the news of the possible breakthrough at CERN-Sasso could of course in theory have been part of the same mythos-making - for example, if the data should turn out to have been due to some formal error in the 'sync-kasse'.

This theme of possible fraud aside, I can add that I myself am working with related material. My interpretation of the data suggesting neutrino speed faster than light would mean that evidence can have been found of interaction with a reality that is beyond the reality of historic time. This does not mean that the neutrinos go 'backwards' or anything the like - it means that there exists what I call a primary poetic reality from which the secondary historic reality is a projection - and the ordinary laws of 'horizontal' causality (of billiard balls on a table) would find a more advanced physics in terms of a 'vertical' causality working on the billiard table from above or below, if you see what I mean. The causal connections of this reality would be within the scope of what I call 'poetic logic'.

This would be fine theory and not much more if the existence of the poetic reality could not be proven - like the old ether theory which often is subject to contemplation in theories of science. Neutrino theory could resemble this problem if neutrinos 'cannot be detected'. However, I think that I have been able to prove the factual existence of this poetic reality - prior to the historic reality of ordinary causality - by way of my book 'POLAKK English Bloggi' (PEB) (2008-2010) which seems to prove that 'everything' written in an alphabet has a 'form of authorship' which conforms to historic cycles of 1000 years - apparently with surprising precision. At least this is the cycle in my work - could be other cycles can be detected.

In my view, this proves that there exists a poetic reality prior to the historic one. And if its poetic logic can be described, then it will be possible to send information through a 'poetic infinity' and hence break the communicational belt of some lightyears around the earth.

If so, neutrinos could of course travel 'faster' than light if they are quite simply imprints of alternative historic derivations - but that does not have to mean that anything could travel faster than light within one and the same historic reality. The sensational finding in CERN-Sasso would then mean not that Einstein was wrong but that it could be possible to measure the interaction of the historic reality with the poetic reality - possibly even for an information technology able to communicate with remote parts of the universe. Hm.

This means that it could be possible to describe the derivation from a 'poetic-etymological' creation or event in the poetic reality to its surface format in the historic reality where matter takes shape, and this new poetic logic would supposedly be far stronger than the physics based on Aristotle and his logic, such as all modern science traditionally is.

The 'hoax' of the british-symbolic reality is that the alphabet is a notation of phonemes and not the mystic semiotic processes which makes the alphabet meaningful in a way which makes it possible to notate thought - and this 'hoax' is also what recognizes the historic reality ('phonemes') as the ultimate and independently describable physicalist reality, ignoring its rooting in a poetic reality from which it is a derivation. Modern terror serves to try and keep this illusion up, as long as it lasts.

If neutrinos travel straight through anything and faster than light, it probably only means that they travel through the poetic reality.

The derivation from the poetic to the historic reality is what I have described in my 'The Endmorgan Quartet' (TEQ). This work describes the formation of a poetic articulation in the mind of the poet, while the PEB describes how it is written down.

See johnbjarnegrover.com/poeticlogic.htm for details.

The good news in such a poetic reality would also be that nazism and terror-driven administration generally - as an offshot from the british-symbolic reality - would crumble.

Thanks and best wishes,

John Grover
Pf.15
1152 Wien
Austria

johnbjarnegrover.com