Talmud Eruvin and the house-space issue
John Bjarne Grover
The article tells of the possible background of a possible house-space persecution program in extension from nazi interests in terms of alternative readings of the hebrew of Talmud Eruvin.
Talmud Eruvin is about the construction of the shared house-spaces and regulations about how to relate to private and public space. These are matters of interest for those who could be planning a new persecution program on basis of the house-space where the holocaust was on the genetic body-space.
There are also reasons to believe that my years in Ehamgasse 23 in Vienna could have been planned long ago for the particular case of 'Eruvin' = 'er u i Wien' = 'are you in Vienna?'
There are many ways to translate the old hebrew of the Talmud if one goes onto it word by word. For the parts which deal with the house-space and political matters related to it, this tractate of the Eruvin can be interpreted in light of the essential issues when it comes to shared space of consciousness (genetics, house etc). Probability and entropy themes are natural ways of imposing meaning onto this matter - and the theme of probability can be recognized in the talmudic concept of 'medical prognosis' (YUMD), which according to Jastrow also can mean 'estimate', 'guess'. One can guess that british hebrew scholarship has studied - with a particular view to it - these parts of the Eruvin and marvelled by the idea that the 'probabilities' of the house-space come down to something resembling 'Ronk Röver' and indeed can find a correlate in these hebrew forms which occur in these parts of the tractate about the philosophy and construction of shared house-spaces. These cases of british scholarship can be as old as Stonehenge. From these readings of the hebrew of Eruvin, the whole construction of the holocaust can have been established. And for my own part I can consider the hypothesis that the construction of the Eisenhower doctrine could be related to the same. These issues also mean that one gets those unfortunate academic discussions which divide into 1) those who opt for the new holocaust via probabilistic and structuralistic grammars, and 2) those who get their resources from the former holocaust via the nazi death camps. Structuralism vs. generativism could be seen as a debate on house- vs body-space of these tragic issues. That only means that academic institutions are steering into murky waters wherever they move - as long as these matters are not cleared out properly.
I here present four different readings of a couple of fragments from the Mesorah segmentation. Those which are mine are based on my struggles with dictionary-leafing and guess-works with grammar in hand. The two fragments are nos.159-160 in the parallel text to my TEQ #14.
1) The Mesorah translation, folio (16a1 2nd col near top) discusses the construction of house-spaces: "and if the open [area of the partition] is larger than the walled portion / it is forbidden [to plant greens] even opposite the wall segments".
2) First alternative reading: "My mother came to be murdered due to a judas plan in the medical prognosis / a breath of published praise of the estimated tied chain"
3) Second alternative reading: "the entropy of a subset with a number of elements above estimated probability / the addition law of conditional subset entropies forms a probability chain". (This is the academic interest in 'Markov chains').
4) Third alternative reading: "and the womb came to be broken open by a saucy dip above the guessed, / an overheated 'chervil' [vegetable] chain".
One can spot elements from various nazi-affiliated political programs. It is unfortunately likely that the programs of administration often is not more advanced than the giggle by such puerile readings. 'Saucy' it could be for example if one mistakes the animal for the daughter's precious thing. The alternative 4) could be about the word of the San Pantalon 'soffitto', the 'nazi cunt', valleyed out by the sauce of an overheated guest, which could be e.g. Hitler on christmas eve 1957. Quite simply 'or[d]e[t]-dal-såsen'. The Gröver/'Mengele's looked at the site but changed their minds and went for Labråten instead.
One notices that the name of the doctor who wrote the death certificate of Nelly Sachs was called 'dr.P.Lindell', which resembles the 'chervil' somewhat. I once asked Gröver/'Mengele' if he had considered any other name when he changed from Jensen, and he said, while putting his foot on the first step of the staircase for going up, that he had considered 'Erving' but had changed his mind.
These puerilities seem to be the 'secret obsession' of administrations who want to partake in a (new) mass murder, and those who do not are apparently not allowed to tell the truth because it is 'secret'. And so the world of (puerile) administration could be steering towards a new catastrophe of 'Ronk Röver' without anybody saying anything. The theme seems to be masturbation as 'new information technology' - a sort of tele-transmission - and the plan of adminstration could be to be to install 'masturbation metres' hidden in the house-walls - infrared or other sort of detector which can make the lamps blink in the headquarter if somebody masturbates. And so they can send out the 'chervil'.
The readings are approximately as different as the alternatives when one reads a cuneiform tablet in either sumerian, accadian, hittite or any of the other languages of those days - such a clay tablet could normally be read in various languages and the readings would differ like the above. One could speculate that these 'decipherments' - apparently by british scholarship, much of it - could have been more or less deliberately attuned to just these variants in the reading of hebrew. 'Eblaite', for example, could happen to output from an old clay tablet a story about an old woman who was eating an apple when suddenly a tooth fell out, while a 'hittite' translation of the same tablet could be about king Bubba who had brought a cow to the wedding of the daughter of the neighbour king and was unhappy about the reception, while a the third reading of the same tablet could claim that it is 'sumerian' and contains a list of items acquired to the court of the emperor, etc. It is likely that cuneiform is not deciphered at all.
The story with Ehamgasse could be about such theoretic things. Was there a little cottage - without reed roof, though - on top of the house? I don't remember exactly but think perhaps there was a little 'Abstellraum' there. I have never understood why the default word on all doorbell buttons in Austria is 'TOP'. But there is probably an explanation to this which is not too 'saucy'. However, the reported death of Benazir Bhutto in the car roof opening made me think of this little opening up to the houseroof (b-hut-o) - and an alternative to 'tied chain' above is 'prisoner'. Certainly there are such reasons for such ideas, although it can be added that the 'Abstellraum' in my flat #17 had a red stain on the wallpaper and a little on the floor which the previous tenant - when I came to see it in November 2004 - explained was due to a glass of beetroot (not chervil) which had exploded on a shelf. It did look like that, so I suppose that could have been the reason. (She also forgot some utensils which I had to suppose she had left on purpose and forgotten to throw in the garbage - a party corkscrew of the type which breaks as soon as you try to use it, a safety razor, a plastic bottle with some fluid and other things). But when the story about the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' started, it could have reminded me of a 'Fiancee-Beitrag' which could remind one of a 'betrothed-Beitrag', and then the glass of overheated beetroot could invoke associations to this 'overheated chervil'. It was when the inspector from ÖVW saw the stain on the wallpaper in that Abstellraum - after having entered from the lift where somebody had left a red stain of some paint on the white wall under the lift-button just that day, in fact around just those hours when the inspector came (and I had earlier sent a letter of apology to the administration when the liftdoor had got a mark from a metal suitcase of mine) - that he exclaimed: "Hier muss alles runter!" and they later refurbished the flat totally at my cost. That sort of 'sanierung' of wallpaper and floor covering - at a cost equalling my 'Finanzierungsbeitrag', which left nothing for me - would leave the flat and my resources 'null and void' (norwegian 'död og makteslös' = 'dead and helpless/powerless'). It was the strange coincidence with the names resembling the point 42.666% in my 'Hammerfest' relative to this US film "American Beauty" which made that expression potentially relevant. In particular after the death of a neighbour in 2007. There was also the ado with the communications of Fredrikstad and the lawyer who forwarded the things which I returned to Labråten. And I have come to remember the film 'Der dritte Mann' with 'Baron Kurz' as well as the story of Danderyd and Jensen as the possible driving motor in much postwar terrorism - while in reality it could be that it came down to not much more than a handshake and a joke, for all I know. And then of course the interesting question could be why I wrote my book as I did around 42.666%. The book is called 'Hammerfest' - a name which for me is about the time of the poet in northern Norway.
There was also the story with my attempts to buy a guillotine for cutting the edges of my home-made books. That problem is always the bottleneck if there are nobody selling the service - one can of course go to a bookprinter and hope that they are friendly but they never sell the service and then one can risk running around town for a long time before one finds one who is in the mood for it. In Vienna one can buy the service from bookbinders and so the problem is solvable, but that is not the case everywhere. In Athens, for example, it is not easy to solve the problem and bookbinders do not take the chance of using the 'iron edge' which they use for themselves (since evil customers could have spikes in the books which could ruin the machine totally) and therefore they use the other and rather rough side of the edge. Then it costs nothing but it looks not good and it is only if they have the time and good mood. The book I made and wanted to cut was 4 cm thick. It anyhow is a problem with often much running around for having only three cuts for a book, and so a simple home guillotine would be fine. If one has the space for it and does not move around. (Why hasn't anybody invented the table version for home enthusiasts? It could be a simply clamp with two screws and a sharp iron edge which could be driven slowly through the bunch of paper by way of a single third or doubler screw, and the whole construction should be cheap and produce fine cuttings - one does not need a machine for doing it, a mechanic construction which requires a minute or two or five or even ten for getting through is no problem for a home book binder - but it would be a potential threat against the 'ISBN culture' and the rule of submission to publisher including the political control therein?) There was a nearby copyshop in Vienna who had such a machine and it was closed and the things sold in bankruptcy style, but I had the feeling that it could have been closed for precisely the reasons of my need (I suppose not, though) and I had to drop the project. I then called for an ad in a newspaper (or was it 'Bazaar') and the man who took the phone explained that it could cut 4 cm. I had to come and see it. We appointed to meet and it turned out that it was in a storage facility in a slightly remote or at least enclosed area and when we entered I was starting getting cold feet. The enclosure where it was stored was a sort of garage type and the machine was in the back of the room (along with other transported and stored-away items) and two people could not be there at the same time and he had to go out for me to inspect it. While I looked at that big knife - which was for cutting cardboard and not for my needs, and certainly it could not cut 4 cm - he could have slammed the door and kept me in that 'Ab-stell-raum', 'cut off' from the rest of the society. He reminded me slightly of a person I had met in Sweden once, on a trip with the train.
In short, when Thomas Klestil died when I registered my address in Vienna in 2004 and Haider when I registered in Venice, one could speculate if it be about 'Claire Goll' and the story with accusations of plagiarisms against Celan. Here it could be about 'null and void' and the US film. One also observes the phenomenon that 'Condoleezza Rice' is a name which can be spotted in the underweb of the text to the Eisenhower doctrine #2 where my name can be spotted in #6 (I don't know if she would have been affiliated with the doctrine from an early stage in the way I seem to have been), and when one of the alternative readings about a 'small room' is about the 'conditional rise' of entropies and probabilities, the other alternative of a beetroot or overheated chervil could be about putting just those aspects of it into play.
I hope the plan is not to declare Austria for being so 'verrückt' that it has to be put under administration by the western forces. I add the four names of the linguistics institute in Oslo which seemed to represent the lines around the 'Tanaquill' of Spenser's "Faerie Queen" ('The first booke' intro 2) and the camera of Hörbiger in Ehamgasse: Even Hovdhaugen, Rolf Theil Endresen, Elisabeth Lanza, Hanne Gram Simonsen. The lines from Spenser are these (Penguin edition 1987, editor Ricks):
Lay forth out of thine euerlasting scryne
The antique rolles, which there lye hidden still,
Of Faerie knights and fairest Tanaquill.
(It continues with the 'Briton Prince'). In addition, there was the student Arnfinn Vonen whose name resembles "I'm Wiener Wohnen" - the alternative to the flat I had got via Wien Wohnservice and hence the only real escape route. The first time I met him was, I think, at the entrance to the lift on the ground floor - it was summer and he was wearing an armless shirt. It was probably in 1990. It is only today that this looks a little above chance level, but that is of course due to what happened later and not then.
The world is indeed a little hopelessly lost in its own secrecies, and if it be the case that academic linguistic theory cannot progress before this battle of structuralism vs generativism is explained to be a matter of choice of holocaust method, then it is time to end the period of secrecy in administration. These matters discussed here are easily described and recognized, and to reserve them for use as 'potentially goodenough reason' for political action is not the right thing. I suppose if one opens the little cottage on the houseroof of Ehamgasse 23 in Vienna, there is nobody there, no 'ape' with arms cut bestially off for symbolizing the Dreyfus case of a 'May clan-mark' for the idea of 'Ku Klux Clan' - and the nuclear bomb on Nagasaki could have represented Adolf Eichmann, an austrian. If Haider represented 'besten' - the best they had, cp also the recent election - by his death (Ragna Eidsvig's 'besten' would be Ragna Landmark and my own 'besten' = official grandfather was Bjarne Eidsvig who even could have been just that same Eichmann - he seemingly represented Hiroshima, and I can add that the owner of the house where I lived in Krumgata in Oslo lived on 'Bestum'), it could be about Austria as Israel, something which could have made Austria appear as a sort of 'jewish enclave' to England in the sense of the tip of the 1-2-3 arm from England via Norway to Israel. (If there is a 'beste-um' in the Haider case, one could think of a 'swart-water' loop shifting country names in Europe, such as Portugal for England, Spain for Portugal, France for Spain, Germany for France and England for Germany - like shifting bitwise right or left in an FFT derivation - and if France is not willing to give up its position, Austria could be the alternative. Such a 'beste-um' could contain a swap of personal roles of Ragna Gröver and me - and if there are royal affiliations with her role, it could make for the 'Briton Prince' on me. This is particularly interesting in view of the fact that Seitenstettengasse in Vienna resembles Krumgata in Oslo and the jewish community house in Vienna where I came with my letter would correspond to the place where I went around Ragna Gröver in the spring 1995 - which is when the bombing of Lebanon 2006 even could have served to represent such a 'swartwater loop' = 'Black Sea Loop'). When Beowulf cut Grendel's arm off, it could be about reducing Austria to the bermuda triangle of Wien-Linz-Graz if they are considered 'verrückt'.
Being into the theme of former attachments, I add the story about the 'NMI of the state' (cp. 'Tiepolo in Ss.Apostoli?) with Hilde Holbæk Hansen who talked about her father. There is a norwegian expression 'en glad laks' = 'a happy salmon' (I don't have her father in mind here - could be she wanted to talk about something which she could have heard about me - or even mumbling that I did not resemble much my official father?) Not to be confused with the s-Bitter s-Almond which could happen to be a 'smelly' concept for potential genetic relatives of mine. I don't know if her father would have been a lawyer. The word in norwegian for high court lawyers is 'höyesteretts-advokat' ('höyesterettsjustitiarius' is I think a particular position). 'Höy-skrekk-s-of-a-date' would be about being afraid ('skrekk') of the 'hay' (of a date), 'höy-skrekk-s-hospits-avrus' would be more like the delirium tremens (see below). I notice the animated films about 'Shrek' and don't know if there is any connection there. One really should take it for granted that this is a coincidence and not the whole story. Is Shrek's 'fiancee' or 'betrothed' a variant of Ingeborg Bachmann - in which case the 'Celan' of 'Shrek' could resemble John Gröver/'Mengele'? For a gradual takeover/swap of the historic role? It is the phenomenon of the word ENEMY on the university campus by the extensive graffitis in 1987 when I should represent 'NMI of the state' in Musikus which could justify the mention. There was also a hungarian Janos at NMI ('Janos Bitter' was the doorsign of 1991) and a danish Preben - a name which could be recognized in the 'prebendary' of John Grover 1823 and in the 'delirium tremens' which was brought into the same department as me in the psychiatric hospital in Bergen of 1999-2000. (Or was his name even 'Torben'? I recall Trygve Tveterås talking about a 'danish Preben'). Clearly I don't think there is anybody in that TOP hut of Ehamgasse, if there is any hut there at all, but the idea of 'enemy of the state' could have had its origins in those days when I worked for the 'NMI of the state'. There was in any case nobody in my 'Abstellraum' (and I am a vegetarian), but the whole complex could perhaps have served to vibrate such ideas somehow - I don't know if that could have been the case. If the assassination of Bhutto should have served to add force to it, it could have been of rather much importance.
And if 'null and void' was installed into the indexes of the house, it could have had a double function in the sense that my claims of a quasi-plagiarism of the US film "American Beauty" could have been redirected by administration into a claim that I had held an 'ape' in my 'Abstellraum', to which I would be inclined to reply with a 'null and void' by administration - which is what took place when they used my money for refurbishing the flat. Then the whole story could be about a US attempt to gain authority to my authorship.
In short, were there secret surveillance equipment installed in my flat in Ehamgasse and the data forwarded to outsiders? Then it could have been holy wrath who struck against Jörg Haider because of such behaviour which could put the state under risk of being labelled 'verrückt' (if it were state administration who forwarded such sensitive surveillance data). But if the 'holy wrath' were british with a 'goodenough reason' (what they had done against the 'Briton Prince'), then the essential question could be whether the house of Ehamgasse (with the camera of Hörbiger) was a british project or not. It is not likely that the former coincidences of my life were conducted from Austrian administration if they were not quite simply real coincidences but parts of long-term planning. If those coincidences of my life were due to planning from UK/US secret service, such as e.g. MI5-MI6 and CIA, as could happen to be the enumerable stories, then a 'holy wrath' against such behaviour would not be likely to strike against those who would be inclined to represent the same interests in Austria.
In particular, if the role assigned to me is the one of representing the jewish-genetic diaspora, the construction could even have served to create the impression that the Jews keep 'apes' in their 'Abstellraums' and therefore holy wrath is justified. If Klestil/Haider served to represent 'Claire Goll', it could be about the idea of using 'apes' for tapping authorship out of them.
The story could be that if international terrorism with a certain harlem and dirty-beast-in-the-revelation bias has been conducted in the form of UK/US state terrorism in the decades after the war up to about now, and if this period comes to a halt and the situation is relaxed and things are permitted to relax and turn around, the accumulated potential could come to take on the form of a new sympathy for the morally upright UK/US if new tyrannic regimes - of 'verboten' form or whatever - should start to take shape in other parts of the world. Then clearly the official UK/US reading of the hebrew would look like alternative 1) above while immature or 'verrückt' understandings of it could come to be dumped elsewhere.
Could be the ultimate origins of such 'political' phenomena could be traced to the Eisenhower doctrine and its affiliations with me in #6. Just before Christmas 2007 I looked over the names in the governments or state chiefs of many countries of Europe and noticed that there was a possible reference to the Visthouse camera (which could have been the camera of Hörbiger) in a good bulk of them.
(The 'prebendary' - cp. the 'delirium tremens' - is in 'John Grover 1823' with the handwriting 'Croft' close to it. It can be noticed that when the letter of rejection came from the publisher John Benjamins in the context of the Oklahoma bombing in 1995, it carried the date '8 mei' and told that they could not publish the book but believed that William Croft of Oxford had started a new series of related kind. The text immediately before this 'prebendary' is Matt.iii.2 which perhaps could be recognized as 'Matthew Dryer' - cp. also the 'two' of NMI 'Torben' if that was his name).
The holocaust and the poetic computer
The story with Eruvin can perhaps be traced to the time when there was the general feeling in Europe of the mid 19th century of the possibility for a communist revolution and a poetic revolution in information technology - and these would have been two aspects of the same story. Then England launched Boole and all that and the computer came out as it did. This is what makes it look right with this 'poetic computer' solution based on the probabilities of psychological expectancy. Two people have different expectancies and therefore different categories based on probabilities, but when they try to reach a common understanding they land on a boolean sort of common (not communist!) symbolic representation. And those are always countable. It is the reaction which tries to remain in the alphabetic episteme. However, for a poetic (and communist) revolution to come about, the need for the freedom of thought for the subject (human rights in general) would have been a prerequisite.
The derivation of the poetic computer can be shown to go along the following lines, as far as I can understand it:
The entropy of a category A = a1, a2... an is computed as
H(A) = - ∑i p(ai)/p(A) log p(ai)/p(A)
The entropy of a compound aibj, when for example A = noun roots and B = grammatical morphs which can be attached to it, or A = noun and B = verb, is consequently the simple
H(AB) = - ∑i,j p(aibj)/p(AB) log p(aibj)/p(AB)
Conditional entropy is the measure on probability distribution in a category B when it occurs dependently relative to a category A, such as morphs relative to roots. A certain morph category B can occur in many contexts in a corpus but the entropy measure of B in the context of the root category A will not be the same as the entropy of the category B (or A) considered independently. The conditional entropy of B relative to A is H(BIA) and is computed by stopping at all A in the corpus and then counting how many times a B follows in the neighbourhood of A. The probability of the compound p(AB) globally in the corpus is normally defined as the probability of A = p(A) multiplied with the probability of B in the context of A = p(BIA). That is, p(AB) = p(A) p(BIA). One can count the number of AB's in a corpus and compute their probability, and one can count the number of B's in the neighbourhood of A's and compute the relative probability independently - and then counting discrete symbols in a finite corpus will prove that the mathematical relation H(A) + H(BIA) = H(AB) is valid. That is when the symbols are discrete and the corpus is finite.
This is the one out of the laws which apply to this - the addition and commutative laws of conditional entropies. The addition law is this H(A) + H(BIA) = H(AB) - which means that the entropy of category A plus the conditional entropy of category B in the context of A equals the entropy of the compound AB. The commutation law says that H(A) + H(BIA) = H(B) + H(AIB), which means that the addition law applies equally with the dependencies of the relation are imposed on either A or B. Nazis will typically think of this as a potential for turning the neighbours riches into yours or his power and capacities into yours by smart dependency-turning tricks. Now since
H(BIA) = - ∑i p(ai) ∑j p(bjIai)/p(BIai) log p(bjIai)/p(BIai)
and
H(A) = - ∑ p(ai)/p(A) log p(ai)/p(A)
and since ∑j p(bjIai)/p(BIai) = 1.0 for all ai, this can be inserted into the expression for H(A), which then gives
H(BIA) + H(A) = - ∑i,j p(ai)p(bjIai)/p(A)p(BIai) log p(bjIai)/p(BIai) - ∑i,j p(ai)p(bjIai)/p(A)p(BIai) log p(ai)/p(A)
= - ∑i,j p(aibj)/p(A)p(BIai) log p(aibj)/p(A)p(BIai)
while the entropy of the compound AB is given by
H(AB) = - ∑i,j p(aibj)/p(AB) log p(aibj)/p(AB)
= - ∑i,j p(aibj)/p(A)p(BIA) log p(aibj)/p(A)p(BIA)
This gives - if I have got the math right here and it is not an error - the formula of addition of conditional subset entropies. It means that the formula is valid if p(BIai) = p(BIA) for all ai, which I suppose it is normally not. Which means that there are errors in the derivation. There are two errors: The one is the assumption that ∑j p(bjIai)/p(BIai) = 1.0 for all ai, which it trivially is on a symbolic level but not on a subjective and 'poetic' level: If a subset is reconceptualized by B when talking with A, then ∑j p(bjIai)/p(BIai) is not 1.0 in the course of the conversation. And that is what makes the revolution. The other error is the one of p(BIai) = p(BIA).
This means - from the viewpoint of british boolean scholarship - that two errors are needed in order to make the poetic and communist revolution.
That could mean the first and the second holocaust. Two big errors. One on the body-space of the subjective poet and the other on the house-space where his freedom is put under probabilistic dependency.
This is the logic of the western world which derailed the development of the new information technology.
This is clearly false thinking of poetry. To make a 'chervil' = 'dr.Evil' holocaust in order to make the poetic revolution is a mistake which cannot be called anything but the reaction.
The pretext for this false thinking is in the 'probabilistic' reading of the Eruvin. The context around the two fragments translated above is like this (when reading 'probabilistically') :
One must make a mistake and hurry on to discern the one thing from the other by threes, incidentally to mistake the animal for the daughter (her main thing). Every extra difference is a three and it chains up to four. One must make a conceptual mistake and hurry on to discern the one thing from the other by their closed subsets, which means by their full capacity. Incidentally to make a mistake in the reconceptualization is to make a breach in accordance with the estimated value, the entropy of a subset with a number of elements above estimated probability (= 'my mother came to be murdered due to a Judas plan in the medical prognosis'). The addition law of conditional subset entropies forms a probability chain, a sort of 'Markov' chain, and is not commutative, and the Lord enters into the continuation of 4 up to 10 in the decalogue. One must make a mistake and hurry on to discern the one thing from the other by their closed subsets, which means by their full capacity, in order to make a mistake while presenting the document and to make a breach in accordance with the probability estimate in the document. If there is a subset entropy, a conditional entropy of probability surplus, then the conditional entropy forms a chain, and if it forms an entropy from a subset of heightened probabilities then the addition of conditional entropy surplus makes for an increase which is more than one of the ten commandments and forms a chain.
I should add that the line 'to mistake the animal for the daughter' contains an element which I can not find the proper translation of - the line is 'to mistake IZDQR the animal for the daughter' - where IZDQR is an element which I have come to conclude best resembles something like 'had I [only] a ramification', which again makes me associate with the story from the park in Paris. I think I saw - some years later, perhaps some 4 years after I had communicated the details from the meeting to some official authorities via public french telephone - this was before I tried to find a flat in Paris via another public telephone and ended via some mixmax in Rue des Vertus before I found that I had to move on to another coutry - some news about a 'rally-doctor' with a related designation - could be it could have been about the distance Paris-Dakar. There were some elements of buttock-rattling rally-like strategies in the presidential election as well, if I am not entirely mistaken - and wasn't Donald Rumsfeld replaced after it? But this only tells that the above fragment from the Eruvin is of high relevance - and indeed the meeting in the park - not by any direct information but by way of memories from it which I can see as guiding for the finding - put me on the tracks to find the ancient hebrew text which I was not acquainted with earlier - and it does not have to mean that it was an agent for a secret intelligence service or a political party. Rather the story could be telling of how an essential 'mistake' - as could be the position of the name - could happen to be a good thing indeed and of best intentions and rather resemble an offer for a 'beefsteak' - it does certainly not have to mean a morally serious error which could be troublesome for other people.
The following parts of the ancient text can conveniently be interpreted in a similar way and it is probably possible to read out of it the outlines of the suggestions for a 'poetic computer' based on this modelling of the interface between eternity and historic time - which means that this talmudic philosophy could be taken to be suggestive of the solution for the information technology for the third millenium.
This way of reading the Eruvin has apparently been developed into the new school of politics - those politicians who partake in 'the poetic revolution' - which consists in the art of making mistakes in order to create a 'surplus'. The pretext is in this ancient hebrew logic on house-spaces and their 'probabilities' and takes on the shape that 'the decalogue is a list of mistakes recommended for making economic growth'. That is the pretext for terrorism: You shall not murder. The logic resembles the reading of the ancient hebrew commandment against 'idol fitlers' which seems to have been the basis for the construction of Adolf Hitler. And now we must hope that the plan is not to continue with a second 'ad-old feetler', a mistake of addition in the subscripts.
Then the 'Eisenhower doctrine' in combination with e.g. the Octogon project on me makes for an organized interpretation of this. I do not know, though, what is the ultimate reason for this doctrine - if it is to run a 'double agency' with the nazis in order to get a grasp on the historic situation and turn it the right way. That could in theory be the reason and it could be a pretext only. One has to notice that Eisenhower went from the position of 5-star general to President of the Columbia University, a certain drop in status, before he was elected President of USA. This makes for a linguistic relation to Keith Abercrombie of FAO (also around the time of the tragedies of the Great Leap Forwards in China when the doctrine was issued) and hence one has a reason to spot his daughter's name 'Anne Abercrombie' in the undertext of the doctrine #1 (when my name is seen in #6). That is the 'conditional probabilities of the neighbourhoods which the tractate (the jewish 'doctrine'!) is about. One can notice that 'keys upper-C-round-B' seems to be the three symbols which constitute the 'Heinrich Himmler' figure over the entrance door in San Pantalon - the 'keys' in the form of the homunculus (in the blood, sort of) with a full-grown transform in the 'Hermann Göring' figure with the 'tollepinne' on the righthand side, the 'upper' in the lifted hand of the standing 'Heinrich Himmler' figure, and the 'C-round-B' as the pulley of the brown figure - apparently the symbol of economic power (by dirty means) and possibly the reason why the german secret services are in Pullach. That does not mean that Abercrombie was Himmler - but it could mean that there is a tacit or hidden connection from the Eisenhower doctrine to this german organizer of one of the Big Mistakes of human history.
All this means that there is the potential for Making History by way of Making Mistakes in the sense of making a poetic jewish revolution by way of a holocaust against the jews. The jewish tractate even suggests two mistakes and the western world is apparently doing what they can to follow up the jewish program. This could be the program. It could also be the 'political logic' which could be the basis for the Eisenhower doctrine. This does not mean that the doctrine has to lead to disaster - I don't know about that - it could even mean that the doctrine invited the old nazis to make historic mistakes and join the project. There is a potential for a lot of mistakes there.
But secrecy is the trick which makes it a dangerous game - the trick of what could be the fourth strategy in terms of secrecy.
All this seems to have developed as a political reaction from the mid 19th century onwards when the poetic and communist revolution should have started. Clearly this revolution of 'dr.Evil' would be as mistaken from a jewish viewpoint as a nazi interpretation of a commandment against 'idol fitlers' would be.
A probabilistic reading of the Eruvin does of course not mean that this is the way to the communist and poetic revolution - what it means is that one can understand human mistakes against individuals and the community in this way as a result of good intentions, not that one recommends the mistakes as a way of making business or politics. Those who should claim that Lenin's revolution was agency for the western powers probably find a pretext for such ideas in this Eruvin on human consciousness in the 'communism' of housing complexes. The truth is rather that such a reading of the Eruvin can be abused for derailing the communist project by classifying it as masturbation fanatism on a jewish basis - while the real problem is found in the simple symbolic mistakes of boolean tradition.
If there should be plans for a second 'chervil' holocaust of the house-space, the philosophy is likely to be that subjective freedom of poetic thought is the same as masturbation and must be forbidden. It is the reaction of the alphabetic episteme which then would try and ridicule the idea of 'poetic licence' by the mistaken interpretation of 'subjective categories' in the sense of 'holocaust'. It is nazism who tries to make the identity of poetry and holocaust.
This mistaken understanding of the 'probabilistic' reading of the hebrew is also likely to be the background of the sad tendency among 'leftists' to be inclined towards 'dr.Evil' as a means for power.
Ehamgasse in Vienna is in the district called 'Simmering' which resembles 'summering' = 'summation', cp. 'ad-old feetler' in the sense of summation mistakes in the subscripts. Hörbiger across the street was founded in the 1890's. There are lots of 'gasses' in Austria. GAS-PAS-GAS could be about an error in the middle. If nazism consists in three big errors - pederasty, cannibalism and genocide - the cannibalist parametre could be the gloomy idea of eating other people's body parts for making errors of individual categorization - or errors of integrity, as old schoolmasters could thing of it. The GAS of 'Halabjah' is about having an extremity, a body-space, the GAS of 'Bhopal' about having a home, a house-space. PAS could then be about a genocide - taking the step of an 'ad-old feetler'. Benazir Bhutto? I think Claire Goll had a late book title which resembled the form "Paul is in Labråten". "Paul, ern ute?" ('Paul, is he out'?) for 'nålepute' ('pin cushion') would be an 'old norse teitler', cp. 'ad-old feetler'. The former tenant in #17 called the umbrella stand at the door for her friend. Ehamgasse is divided in three parts (cp. above quote from the Eruvin), with two green areas dividing it, one of these at Hörbiger. There are three Skau Jakobsen brothers - Ole, Petter (Enok) and Lars - and a 'skau' is a 'forest'. Hence one could say about Ehamgasse that it is 'en tredelt skau' = 'a forest divided in t[h]rees'. A 't[h]ree-parted wood'. Is even 'PAS' = 'Petter Andre Syversen' named after the 'seven' in the clockdial of the Tiepolo painting in Ss.Apostoli - which means the host-giver's [similar even to Even Hovdhaugen?] genital region? Well but that would apparently be the boy over on the righthand side - the 'andre' side. Hence 'Petter Andre Syversen' ('PAS') could be that boy to the right who also could be recognized as 'Janos Bittel-[iten]' ('Janos Teeny-weeny') - cp. the hungarian 'Janos' at NMI of the state. But if Janos Bitter of 1991 is this Janos Bittel[iten], then the 'almond' part of the smelly 's-Bitter s-Almond' would be 'Armand', Inez Armand of Lenin. Intrigues, triangles... Integrity... One gets so tired of this nazi way of thinking. They always leap to the 'buttock' and cannot think of any other way. The situation with the biscuit of the host in the process of being inserted into the mouth of Lucia could even have been the theme of the alleged murder of Inger Johanne Apenes on 6 May 1978 on Kongsteen at the Old Town in Fredrikstad (three days before Aldo Moro was found in Rome). 'Inn-ger jo han e ape-nes' = 'but he gives it into the nose of the ape' - as if the host is about to be inserted into the nose and not the mouth of Lucia. Cp. also 'Ingrid Betancourt' ('job nark ender over' could have been the explanation to my numb lefthand side after the newspiece in February 2002 - if the 'nark' would have been a chemical story from Hammerfest 1958-59 after Oslo 1957). Jean Bollack wrote in a book about Celan that they were 'in Freundschaft verbunden', as if he once had been presented to him by a third common friend. It is a pity if such great art as this Tiepolo is abused in this way for politics which does not credit the source.
The conclusion on Ehamgasse is likely to be that it could have been a project for constructing a new Adolf Hitler on the form 'ad-old feetler'. And even an 'ad old fitler' for the giving of the host in Tiepolo's painting. And it seems that one must assume that Ehamgasse was a project of UK/US.
Does this heavy administrative representation of Tiepolo's painting of Lucia mean that my own poem #3 from TEQ #2 is written under administrative control? It does not. I have pointed to Trakl's poem "Nachts" and the phenomenon that my poem describes just not what his does: What is in his poem is absent from mine, and that makes for a tension between positive and negative which is an essential part of the story. This is poetic matter and not administrative. I decided to find another good example which could show just this point and looked up Dylan Thomas and found another even better example: It is his poem "I see the boys of summer" from 1934. In this poem there is even mention of the two figures up on the high balcony - "I see the summer children in their mothers..." "There in the deep with quartered shades of sun and moon" as goes the shift down to the two winged heads in one of the two centres of the elliptic form, one part of which makes for the clockdial with the 'four quarters'. The negative of Trakl is called "the dark deniers" in Thomas' three-part poem. Part III is the paternal superego above the scene, with the flint and pitch heads at his axe and with the two pillars kissing, as he calls it. They really are, just kissing. And they are a little green.
The clockdial is a four-winded spinning. Why is it green of the seaweed's iron? That could be due to verdigris of the axe's edge - if it is not the 'green' disc in the lower part of the painting, as if the clock-dial had fallen to the ground. Hold it up to her 'birds' above, at the axe-blade. The woman at Lucia's back has 'hollies' crossing her forehead. Part I is Lucia's monologue, part II the surrounding persons, except for part III which is the paternal superego.
This proves that the theme is entirely poetic and not administrative. Even the clock-dial[s] is. That also makes it no coincidence that my poem omits what Trakl's poem is about (although perhaps one could add the surrounding poems of mine to the analysis in the light of Thomas). It is neither because of administration nor because of Tiepolo's painting. Of course it is possible that administrative representation of uncredited art or poetry is a part of my personal experience, but that could only make it even more urgent to make it clear that this is art and poetry and not administrative logic.
There is much of this poetic theme also in Nelly Sachs' poem "Tänzerin" from her 'Flucht und Verwandlung'. The clockdial is here an 'Erdball' - even stretched to elliptic form. To a 'kreissende Wöchnerin' - perhaps even with the two poles kissing. This proves that if I have learnt from somebody else what is in my poem, then it is rather from Nelly Sachs and not from administration. In particular not from 'ad-old feetler'.
Could be I sent my book to William Croft at Oxford (I don't remember if I did, but I do think I tried Oxford and it was probably then), since he according to Benjamins had just started a new series with matters related to the themes of my book, but I anyhow did not get my book accepted there either. The socalled 'shoe bomber' - the man with a bomb in the heels of his shoe in an airplane - could have been an indication that these matters of 'Syversen' = 'Mr.Shoe-sen' ('7' = 'sju', pronounced like 'shoe') are explosive news, but it also tells that it is a 'madman' who could be interested in coming around with them. Could be this means that the last conclusion to these matters will be that USA assigns to me the role of a terrorist Bitter-man who is an enemy of the USA. (Cp. 'NMI of the state'). The bomber in the airplane with the historic news of '7' - cp. also the story of the shoe of PAS and the behind of PLC in the squatting posture in front of the fridge - could even resemble the attack on USA 11 September 2001, which is what made Bush declare a 'war on terror'. If this is the situation, that the US republicans consider me equivalent with 'Osama bin Laden' (whoever that really be) and his terror attack on USA against which the administration has declared a war while at the same time they run a policy in defence of my person and authorship (cp. the replacement or 'turnaround' of Rumsfeld - 'Grillgasse' is the nearest intersecting street to Ehamgasse 23 with 'Dommesgasse' on the other side - as if it were about the host of the garden party - cp. also the revelation in matter around those times - and the french presidential election could have entailed an element of uncredited borrowing of my story from the park - after they even put up a sculpture opened by Chirac not long before the presidential election on the place where the meeting had been) which then could mean only an even more intense terror-and-monkey-business strategy than the democrat party has managed to come up with, while the US democrat party considers me a legitimate target of abuse (could be on the background of such an interpretation) to the extent that even the White House seems to have allowed for the Oklahoma bombing (I don't know if Clinton would have agreed to the bombing - could be he was tired during the morning 'briefing' and believed that he had signed a document wherein he agreed to increased measures against the spread of firecracker gunpowder in Oklahoma due to the reported danger of terrorism there) in combination with extensive abuse strategies against me and my authorship, then it could be that USA must be considered as governed by one of two parties alternating - which could be called 1) the terrorist party and 2) the holocaust party - and the american people have a choice between these. We must hope that this is not the conclusion in the last analysis. The discovery of that alternative could be the reason for the current global economic crisis: These alternatives are not the way forwards which the world wants, and it is not certain that the world will believe that CIA is the hidden factor which makes it difficult for the republicans to get around the smartnesses of the democrat party. That CIA organization of course could be brimming over with intrigues and concealed networks which could be dreaming of controlling the world. The story of me in this construction could be to be the hidden factor (which could be a way of telling that CIA is behind the terror attacks on USA?) which is hard to discover for the public and which can allow the USA to construct a new holocaust while it seems that the opposite is the case and that the White House do what they can to prevent it, but, alas, in vain. It is not likely that the world believes that there is a basis for such a strategy once more and that is the reason for the economic crisis. Unless we have to conclude that it is the USA who have made the crisis deliberately in order to try and battle the abuse of my mythological person - an abuse which now could be spreading alarmingly even in China. And so forth.
There seem to be in this mythological story also the elements of the traditional pirate's flag with the skull and the crossed bones under it. What a sad interpretation of Tiepolo's painting in Ss.Apostoli with the light body of Lucia.
As far as the dangers of holocaust is concerned, it may be noticed that it seems that what I represent and what I write is very well received and heartily welcomed in USA by both democrats and republicans - but Osama bin Laden they don't want. That indeed could mean blinking alarm lights as far as the dangers of holocaust is concerned if all this only comes down to what could be quite simply US state terrorism and intense monkey business for a terror-and-monkey-business strategy on the jewish-genetic diaspora represented in my person. "Take that 'french president' sinking in" could have been the story from 2006 - possibly even for a 'turn-old/turnout feedler' (in the sense of an 'ad-old feetler'?) of a garden party.
And so the politicians are on this side and the other side only to the extent that they share the same common hidden factor of a not-yet-bitter Osama bin Laden and a preplanned Janos Bitter for whom everything american is the same. (This was a view shared also by Ezra Pound). But that is exactly when the whole thing can end in holocaust #2 as a second 'big mistake' - only because the politicians have a common interest in the war against poetry, the role of which they hope to take over for creating a 'world of administration'. That could mean that the real name of the whole story is 'international secret service'.
And other administrations cannot help me find a publisher simply because they have to wait and see what the americans are doing since that could be of vital importance for understanding the future course relative to this 'hidden factor' as far as involvement in or stance relative to a developing holocaust could be concerned? Then I think the best thing is to stop the game before it is too late and help me find a publisher for my poetry (and could be for my semiotic works as well - the semiotics - I am not talking about the typical sign mysticism in postwar traditions but about studies in human signification, particularly the poetic one - can be translated but the poetry cannot but of course it can be published in a non-english country nevertheless) - and east of England is probably most likely to be the place where one can find a possible publisher.
Clearly the topics discussed in the present article are too complex to allow for easy conclusions.
The Bush phenomenon
Clearly the period of the Bush administration has been a period of peace for my integrity and a restoration of my chances to enter into normal relations with society after the glamourous tumults under Clinton. Could be that also means that we have shared interests, so to speak, in the concept of 'der Bursch' which could be the historic background of the Bush phenomenon in the White House and which seems to have been the phenomenon of Celan's relations with me. It tells that Celan was the father of a 'Bursch' and that was the story. It is the film "Der dritte Mann". The socalled 'infamie' case, led by Claire Goll, could - although I have not found any material which tells it in clear wording - have entailed the insinuation that Celan deliberately had entered into the role of the mythological theatre for being in the middle of the story and make a career therefrom. Could be the insinuations even included the one of having been in an illegitimate relation with the wife of the possible war criminal Gröver/'Mengele' in order to hijack the mighty power potential from the holocaust from Mengele - a ridiculous idea, of course. But in those days maybe the response to some 50% of the cultural people would have been: "Why is that ridiculous?" - and there the intrigues were on as if they were the meaning of life. The relation with Ingeborg Bachmann would have been the reason for this idea. The correspondence between Bachmann and Celan are now published on Suhrkamp under the title 'Herzzeit'. I could not find any explicit mention of me in that story but notice that no sooner was I born in 1957, there is a change in the mood of the correspondence (or maybe it is only I who have that feeling) and there was a crisis in Celan's marriage and it seems that he and Bachmann could have been together again, with following critical emotions (cp. the later 'Ingeborg Lygren' case of 1965). Could be the appearance of me as the 'Bursch' otherwise did not make sense for Celan. ('Bachmann' could in theory have been the origin of the Baader/Meinhof group, in which case 'Andreas' could be the 'Andre' part of the 'PAS' = 'Petter Andre Syversen' name - representing the lefthand side of Tiepolo in Ss.Apostoli or even the second turn of the clockdial for 7 = 19. 'Ulrike' could then be about the husband Ulrich Dähnert who was an organ-builder in Dresden and who married Gudrun Harlan on 8 January 1949 - cp. Hitler's postcard of 1924, whether that be coincidental or not). An addition to letter #112 from Celan to Bachmann (2 December 1958) is a quote from a student called 'Jean Firges' whom Celan seems to refer to including the word 'Gemeinheit' in its expression "Hosiannah dem Sohne Davids!" Celan's letter to Firges is reproduced in Celan-Hirsch (2004) under letter 66 (8.12.58). Firges - a student from Belgia - had even invited Celan to a bottle of wine (cp. the idea of the bottle of Vienna 1948, and perhaps even 'Eruvin') and seems to have written that he would have liked to make a 'Sau' out of him (cp. Gröver/'Mengele's stay at SAO in 1968-69) - or was it about an insinuation that I would have liked to make a 'sau' out of Celan when I grew up? - for which reason Celan wrote back that he could not seriously believe that he would say yes to such an invitation only a few years after some million Jews had been murdered. With 'Spezifisch Jüdisch' Firges seems to have meant 'falsch, kritisch, sklavisch' (commentary to letter 66) which could mean 'ronk jarnegg röver'. "Hosiannah dem Sohne Davids!" is likely to mean simply 'hos John Jensen Gröver' = 'at John Jensen Gröver' which then could mean me in the custody of John Jensen Gröver, under the official custody-parenthood of Gröver/'Mengele'. There is no doubt about the possible reference to my name (as a 'neg-röver' etc.) and to the phenomenon of looking for the specifically Jüdisch in the eyes of the folks on the ramp of Auschwitz. It is difficult to decipher with complete certainty from the book Celan-Hirsch 2004 what were the parametres as far as Jean Firges is concerned - it seems, though, that Firges had been in contact with Celan in the summer 1957 - when I was born - for discussing his dissertation on Celan's poetry and that Firges apparently could have tried to warn the world against the looming dangers of an unknown antisemite in the making - which could mean that he could have insinuated that I hated everything specifically jewish 'at first glance', which then could mean that he took me for Gröver/'Mengele'. It could have meant to be an insinuation that I would 'hate' my own father - which then would have been part of a divide-and-conquer strategy against the jewish-genetic diaspora. But I am not sure exactly what the material says. (One notices also that if Obama is supposed to represent me - see below - in that mythological role of 1958 it could also be about a sort of gradual US-administrative acquisition of my indexes for the role while assigning to me other reasons for my ideas that I am affiliated with the story).
It is absolutely and totally incredible that if this were the hot topic of the days already at the time of my birth and the following years - to the extent even of reaching the top level of government of the world and possibly being the invisible web in much cultural works presented through the media - that I have not yet - 21 December 2008 - heard a word about it. With 'incredible' I don't mean to say that this is unlikely and that I certainly must have heard about it - what I mean to say is that the human race must be a sort of incredible construction if they have not been able to tell me about it to date. That does not mean that I am a 'racist' who does not like humans but it means that I mean that somebody should have told me about it. Instead of somebody telling me this I have had to write thousands of book pages here on the internet. The ambiguous sources in Celan-Hirsch is not sufficiently clear and there is no mention of me at all. Is the reason why I have not heard about this that it was taken for granted that I would become an antisemite when I grew up in the custody of Gröver/'Mengele' - and one would not even speak to such a nazi? (This is one of several possible alternative 'parallel readings' of the bombing of Lebanon 2006 after I had tried to get in contact with the jewish community in Seitenstettengasse). And would that idea even have been the reason for the Eichmann case in the early sixties? Then we must hope that human reason has developed a little since those days. If that idea from 1958 were the reason then there cannot be any sort of defense for still keeping these matters secret.
I think those were the years also of Dale Carnegie's books of success - how to win many friends and become a rich man and so forth - I think I remember them from the home of the Eidsvigs in Klipra or at least there was some talk about them - written by that sort of opposite of my name - 'Cale Darnegie' could be for a 'John Bjarne Gröver' - and it could be even for 'Cole and Kursk'. And the carnage of Manhattan 2001? The pretext for such book-successing would have been that nobody would seriously support such a beast - rather people should join the program of keeping the beast of nazism off the public interface and unemployed and friendless and so forth.
'Jüdisch Bursch' seems to have been the concept of the story - e.g. in Celan's correspondence with 'Rudolph Hirsch' who was editor of 'Neue Rundschau' where I think Celan had the first parts of his translation of Valery's 'Der Junge Parze' published. About this translation, which he started in January 1959, he says in addition to letter 135 from Celan to Bachmann (20 July 1959, addition written on 11 July): "Ich habe ein wenig gearbeitet, irgendein Teufel will, dass ich jetzt, statt mit mir selber weiterzukommen, die Junge Parque übersetze, von den 510 Versen sind 460 übersetzt, der Teufel oder einer seiner näheren Verwandten helfe mir nun weiter!" Five lines (not 'five days') above there is mention of 'Lilly von Sauter'. The Grövers acquired a Sauter piano in Volda in 1964, while Lily produced the pills I had to swallow (down my throat) at the hospital in 1999-2000.
'Rudolph Hirsch' (could be even as 'Jüdisch Bursch') was editor of 'Neue Rundschau' which was published four times annually and hence corresponded in this respect to 'Language', the periodical which printed the article which seemed to have be related to the book I had submitted to Benjamins who used Noonan as reviewer and who returned the book in concert with the Oklahoma bombing. The 'Oklahoma kid' could then have been the idea related to this 'jüdisch Bursch'. The first letter from Hirsch to Celan was on 3 May 1954 and starts with a mention of Herrn Roditi from whom he had got Celan's address in context of a 'Kavaphis-essay' of 'Madame Yourcenar' (not 'Madame Paulcelan').
'Neue Rundschau' could perhaps also have been recognized in my first meeting with my neighbour in flat #16 in Ehamgasse in 2005 - she had problems with turning the key in the door to her flat and I had to help her. It really was hard to get around but it eventually turned. This key would in south-western dialects of Norway be called 'nöyel', and hence 'nöyel rundschau' could mean that both she and I could see the key turn around. Even a microphone could probably have detected that. Or if one turned the head around one could see the housedoor to another neighbour (with the standard hole for peeping out). (Cp. 'Skau' and the 'three-divided forest' of Ehamgasse).
I don't know if 'Rudolph Hirsch' would have been informed about the plans about me - who then already would have been waiting in foetus form in a freezer when Hirsch wrote his first letter to Celan in 1954 - and whether even Celan himself would have been. It is perhaps a likely explanation that Hirsch could have been informed about this role of his (as the 'Jüdisch Bursch' of Celan) while Celan himself was not - but that Celan naturally answered in good faith. Then when I was born in 1957 he and Bachmann once again was together with a following crisis for Celan's marriage. He would perhaps not have guessed this connection before he got the information in 1958-59 and made a translation of Valery for Hirsch's periodical. A few days before I was born on 29 June 1957, in a letter dated 10 June (I don't know when Firges was in contact with Celan in Paris), Hirsch wrote a letter to Celan ending with this mystery phrase: "Orpheus ist wieder einmal von den Mänaden zerrissen worden, und diesmal war es eine Kleinbürgerin namens Eva Rechel". 'E var echel' could be Mengele-sunnmörian for 'I was disgusting' or on the form 'e var edrel/edru' = 'I was sober' (= I had not 'drunk'), which could mean that he was not the father of the 'Bursch'. (I saw some article on the internet about Mengele's experiments with human foetuses and how he tore them apart for his experiments). Celan answered on '16 Juni' ("Lieber, verehrter Herr Dr.Hirsch") and Hirsch replied on '16 Juli': "Lieber verehrter Herr Celan, Flehentlich bitte ich Sie, uns den kurzen Text zu schicken, der nichts anderes enthalten soll als die Lebensdaten Blocks und die Entstehungszeit des Cyclus. Ich brauche diese Zeilen für die Disposition des Herstellers, der sonst nicht vorwärtskommt. Ausserdem haben wir auch noch nicht Ihre Korrektur". If there were a 'Korrektur' of me as the 'product' of the story from Brinken, Oslo, in Christmas and in Hammerfest, one could spot the outlines of a story of the relation between the Bursch and Celan (not the Clan!) which was not the same as in the relation between Sachs and Celan. There is also the notable parallelism in the publication history of Celan with the matrimonial history of Anne Sexton - a parallelism which one could believe could have been not entirely due to the phenomenon of 'twin poets' if that is a natural phenomenon.
Celan in his letter to Sachs of 26 October 1959 - in an addition after his signature - is certainly aware of the 'Bursch' phenomenon: "Und niemand antwortet diesen Burschen! Auch das - das Antworten - bleibt dem Juden überlassen. Die anderen schreiben Bücher und Gedichte 'darüber'..."
There is a similar mention in an unsent letter of Celan to Max Frisch of 23 September 1961 (reproduced in 'Herzzeit' 2008): "Und Sie wissen auch, dass ich all dem ebensowenig widersprechen kann wie allem Bisherigen: keinem dieser Burschen geht es um Wahrheit. Darum auch, gegen alle Evidenz, diese ganze bodenlose Infamie".
In short, it appears that the story of the 'Jüdisch Bursch' (me, it seems) is the real contents of the socalled 'Infamie' case against Celan, which seems to have been a hot topic/intrigue in the late fifties and early sixties, after I was born and a lot of tumult and scandal was whipped up. If I represented the jewish-genetic diaspora after the holocaust, the intended conclusion could be, as far as the cultural life of the western world is concerned, that 'nothing good came out of all this scandal'.
'Rundschau' is also equivalent with 'Kringsjaa', the student town where I lived 1987-88. 'Nöyel Rundschau' could then mean the key of the room in that place.
If the purpose with making this alleged 'beast' in the custody of a potential nazi from Auschwitz were to quite simply turn things around, and if this has come to be a dominating phenomenon in the postwar world, the reason for it would probably quite simply have been that 1) the holocaust was the main purpose of WWII and 2) it was England who organized the holocaust via agent Hitler in Germany. And then instead of the world coming to grips with the facts in this story one has tried to complete the turnaround with my role as of e.g. 1958.
'Birthday' in norwegian is 'bursdag' = 'Bursch-day'. George Bush is born on Bjarne Eidsvig's birthday 6 July, but some 47 years after him. When Clinton went for a trip to Oslo in 1999, in the early morning before he left an Air Egypt plane crashed outside Long Island at 0047 time in the hour when the clock turned winter time from 0147 after having described a big 'N' in the air. If George Walker Bush is the 'jüdisch Bursch' who has just learnt to walk or is in the process of learning it, it could be about me in Hammerfest 1958. Then it is of course felt by me if his presidency should come to mean a representation of the interests of that little Bursch who could have been rather defenseless up there in Hammerfest ('seelisch ganz zusammengebrochen', as Sachs wrote to Celan about Peter Hamm on 11 September 1958 - adding a comment on his suffering 'an die äusserste herzzerreissende Spitze' - not 'Spritze'!). But Bush of today is not as defenseless as the Bursch of those days - and it is not 'monkey business' from that point of view. Of course this situation clearly makes it an important issue whether the period of Clinton - with all its characteristics - has a continuation on the other side of the millenium shift in more than a temporal sense of it into the period of Bush in the White House. Could be that is why the story of the Oklahoma bombing is of some importance to me.
Why all this Sachs-Celan-me in the top of world politics? It must be about that jewish-poetic revolution which there should have been around the mid 19th century.
For the phenomenon of 'sinking in', see the article on etymological form. On the background of the 'Skau' and 'Ehamgasse' and 'Rundschau' phenomenon, one could observe that some studies of the poems in the article as far as scrabble-permutation of the alphabetic symbols (which does not mean 'etymological' studies) are concerned seem to converge on the conclusion that Churchill could have suffered from trichinosis (which he e.g. could have acquired as war reporter in the Boer war). That could of course have been a secret of state from his medical file. I don't mean to say that the Bushes suffer from trichinosis, but clearly there could have been the role for a secret of state in a medical file relating to me. Which could have been about my time in Hammerfest. It is the book with this title which seems to have been the background of the US film "American Beauty" and perhaps even the stories from Ehamgasse 23, whether that be due to my personal associations or whether that be facts due to organized administration.
Whether that be a coincidence or not, to the extent that Tiepolo is a shared reference for political events which could have some affinities with me, it can be noticed that the phonological similarity with Ole 'Devold' perhaps could be non-coincidental historically - if the name of the sunnmörian has its motivation in the venetian painter. I do of course hope that the US program is not to make a 'devil' out of my mythological role for understanding me - and the jewish-genetic diaspora - in that light.
After Molde and Oslo 1957, the trip around Norway in the years of my childhood seems to have modelled the concept of 'Ronk Jarnegg Röver', cp. the idea of a 'shower war'. The BOER war could have been arranged for the mirror on Sunn-MOERe. 'Boer' means a person who lives in a house - hence the house-space issue. Churchill was a war reporter in the Boer war and was allegedly taken prisoner but was released against a ransom of 25 pounds. Bjarne Eidsvig bought Visthouse some years later for 25 thousand NOK. (I notice some potentially related ideas from Ehamgasse 23). If the americans in general have a feeling that they suffer from a cultural sort of 'trichinosis' (cp. 'iNRI driter' and the idea of a 'registration number' on TOP of the cross - and the stories of Klestil and Haider at the time of my address registrations), it is not the jewish-genetic diaspora - nor me - they suffer from. It must be their own handling of their own situation which is the reason if that is their problem.
A study of the etymologies in the poem from TEQ #2 leads up to this concept of 'trichinosis' - and then one can look up the hebrew for 'tructory atgill' and 'duncan blue' and find 1) the 'ball of the earth' which both Sachs and Thomas mention - which lends poetic motivation to my poem - and 2) the concept of 'wax [st]and tax'. In the sense of 'Vaagstranda Tax' (cp. Rudolph Hirsch and Max Frisch) it is likely to be the 70th birthday party of Bjarne Eidsvig in 1969 when he allegedly went bankrupt on his 70th birthday and the danish creditor 'Tage Pris' took his oyster farm on Vaagstranda. But this 'birthday' is just the 'bush-day' in norwegian. The fact that George Bush is born on the same bush-day but his name sounds like 'Jüdisch Bursch' (my birthday is one week before Eidsvig's) could even be the reason for his position in the republican party - in which case it could be telling of an orientation away from a holocaust program. Which then also could apply to the 'jüdisch' of the Eruvin tractate. One notices that the 70th birthday party included Aron Eidsvig and other folks around the table - which then could be called a 'benket holocaust'.
'Tage Pris' in this sense of it could be just the theme of the economic crisis of these days - when it means 'the price of the day'.
That the movement of the gravel on the shore is an essential element in the story appears not only from Yeats' poem but also from George Seferis' "Book of exercises", the poem 'Thursday' in the part 'Mr.Stratis Thalassinos', 'Notes for a week'. This contains many of the same elements plus this single one of the sea receding from the shore - leaving 'their own bitterness' where Yeats had pebbles. Could be the heart has been thrown to the dogs - which even could happen to be the poetic name on this website if 'Janos Bitter' is the program.
Sappho fragment 145 = "Don't move gravel!" ('me kine kherados'). Alcaeus fragment 344: "This I know for certain, that if a man moves gravel, stone not safely workable, he will probably get a sore head" (Loeb translation).
Don't move gravel = me kine kherados ---> theos ek mekhanes = deus ex machina ---> mekhane kerine (kerinos) = waxen machine ---> 'dos-kine mekhera' which probably can mean 'Duncan Blue' by scrabble mechanics, a sort of DOS-computer
It is well possible that this is just the logic - based on Sappho and Alcaeus - which was behind the 70th birthday dinner on Vaagstranda. I recall a few comments which could be indicative of that (e.g. in Eidsvig's car when we passed a gravel production site at Maandalen - which even could be the origin of Walter Mondale in the US government - and Eidsvig said 'her er det grusomt mye grus' and 'der er det gresselig mye gress'). One could also notice that the second-hand car which PAS got from PLC for Christmas early 80's broke down on the first trip, according to herself, which could be a 'me kine kjerra', and then the same happened with him in Botswana when his car was squeezed between 2-3 lorries on 7 August 1986 - car-is-on-a-car - hence 'me kine kjerra-2'. But that could mean 2 errors. Cp. also the two errors of Klestil and Haider. When I came to Vienna and pressed the doorbell button on 1 July 2004, I thought I heard a voice saying in the doorphone that I had to wait some 15 minutes because of 'zwei serben', but it could be that I heard wrong and that it could have been about 'zwei sterbend'.
It is likely that scrabble mechanics cannot solve the problem since the nazi program was to remain just there in the movearound of the alphabetic symbols. But these two 'string expressions' seem anyhow to be what the story is about.
'To move gravel' is here to roll away the stone away from before the grave. And there was nothing inside. Except perhaps for the authenticity of some worms and a 'ball of earth' and some other stuff. This is indeed also what the Madonna of Paris 1830 could tell about - she was holding a 'ball of the earth' in her hands and I think she is traditionally conceived of as standing or stepping on a worm. That is what is left inside the 'alphabetic vault' if the jewish person is no longer there. Mary Magdalene seems to have been among those who entered the grave and found it empty. I think that it is very important that my book be published.
If 'wax-stand tax' ('Duncan Blue' interpreted in hebrew) also means the cork which could have been driven in for giving space to Adolf Hitler in Christmas 1957, there could be even the film title 'Taxi Driver' (1976) there. That is about the time when I was offered by Ragna Gröver (formerly Ragna Eidsvig or 'Eidsvig, Ragna') some stroganoff 'beefsteak' in brown sauce (and I notice that if it had been a 'rumpsteak', the 'word' in the 'valley' = 'ore-dal' could have been a 'fart' [ins Staublose?]), inside a plastic box which looked a little suspicious when it was served on a plate with the box on it and the stroganoff inside, allegedly for gaining weight by proteins after my weight-loss of mononucleosis early 1975 (I think it was around the time or not long after I had started using spectacles). I could not say no thanks since I had no reason to say no and it was served with the pretext of the health of mine. Custody parenthood includes the responsibility of the contents of food. If there should have been something 'suspicious' in the plastic box, it could perhaps even have served to index elements a la the Kursk-and-Cole - cp. the 147 + 43/44 numerality of 'Aktion Reinhard' - in which case one could have wondered if the reference in the Kursk-and-Cole could have been this 'wax-and-tax' = 'TV' of 1975. The numerality of 43/44 means line 11 in the sonnet algorithm and hence also the year 1986 when the telephone terror started - with the telephone standing on top of the TV set the first time it rang for this silent call type - as if somebody should have been calling from 'the other side'. I did not have any reason, beyond the 'suspicious' package (the 'dunk'? - was it even heated in warm water in the sink? - I recall PESJ telling of a cup of coffee he once got from an american who made it from instant coffee on a tube mixed with water from the tap = 'spring' and heated in a microwave oven), to believe that there could have been anything suspicious about the meat inside it (in 1975). I don't know why it had not been 'moved' out of the box and onto the plate. I suppose it must have been in the spring or early summer 1975.
Could be the purpose with such 'Kursk-and-Cole' and possibly related 'wax-and-tax' could be to turn the roles around in order to assign to Israel - or even and rather the diaspora as the negated variant of Israel - the role of a 'dirty beast in the revelation' with all sorts of nazi parametres attached to them. Secrets of state, medical files, house surveillance, trichinosis, genetics etc.
What is the conclusion to this as far as politics is concerned? I know little about politics and have not followed the american scene but I think one must conclude that the matters discussed in this article is what could constitute an underweb to the political reality, and then it probably is about the construction of a new information technology. The problem seems to be the reaction who wants to remain in the alphabetic technology - and that is where the formula could entail the need for a few errors - while the solution clearly is found in the level of knowledge beyond the vault of the alphabetic symbols. The etymological form I have in mind (such as in my Endmorgan Quartet) is not in the scrabble of alphabetic symbols and probably not even in the reconstruction of historic forms. Could be genetic affiliation of languages ultimately goes back to typological variation over poetic universals in language. Jesus was a Jew and could be that is the story. 'Tructory Atgill' could have an etymological rooting beyond the alphabet in the sense of a paternal authority supporting the will of the breath - but not in the sense of 'verboten life support' of a 'pulley' type. Seferis' poem ends with what perhaps is just that element - and that is not likely to be the will of inheritance of custody parenthood. Genetic and custody will of breath is not the same. In particular, it is not about a first and a second holocaust on basis of the idea of an old and a new testament.
Seferis is a great poet and his 'Notes for a week' seems to have solved many of the problems rising from this complex. There are also traces of 'Duncan Blue' and of 'Tructory Atgill' and even the Lucia of Trakl on Friday. And the Sunday contains the two poles at the end of Thomas' poem which are the beginning lines of my poem #4 from the same book. But Seferis was not only a great poet - he was also a politician who worked with foreign policy and was ambassador to England and other countries.
For my part what is important is for me to find the way out of the mythological and political role. To remain in that invisible role which seems to have been constructed for me in the late fifties is not the solution - that is probably what was created by the reaction.
© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 17 December 2008
Last updated 23 December 2008
