On the 'third secret of Fatima'

On the 'third secret of Fatima'

John Bjarne Grover

The third secret of Fatima seems, at least since it was written down by the visionary Lucia and stored in the safe of the Bishop of Leira in the fourties, to be the centre of interest for much politics - and in particular the Klipra connection seems to have taken interest in it. (The secret was published with ceremonial opening of the closed envelope in 2000 or 2001, with Lucia herself present, but one could imagine that somebody had managed to get the safe up and had photographed the secret through the envelope before it was opened officially). There seems to be an interpretation of it with much public appeal, based on the following ideas: One sits in a bathtub and struggles with soaping the back of the body as far down as possible. One stretches and reaches as far as possible with the soap in the hope of covering even lower parts of the back, when suddenly some mysterious force (it could of course be simple gravity) sucks the slippery object out of the fingers and it is gone. One searches in vain around in the dirty water but cannot find it, and finally one steps out of the tub and pulls out the plug. It isn't there! Where is it?

There could be many theories on this, including the idea that the soap disintegrated in the friction caused by the 'Wirbelwasser' as the water ran out of the tub.

According to traditional folk metaphysics, the subject's reality is a solipsism which is blown up by the divines like they are blowing up a balloon. The divine blows the air in through the anus of the growing human untill the individual is full grown and blown. Sometimes people feel the need later in life for going to the 'shrink' for having it adjusted. Objects of the real world are drifting around on the bubble as on a flanellograph or on the front window of an astronaut, and this constitutes the subjective world. The key to the mystery is in the nature of the bubble: If a divine - or somebody in a comparable role - starts sucking the subjective world out again, then the subjective world will diminish and a soap which happens to be in this region in that moment could probably be annihilated from the screen of the soap bubble.

This is a possible explanation to the mystery: The soap had dissolved because a quasi-divine had started sucking the world just then.

Such an annihilated soap must, though, go somewhere, even if it stops being an ordinary existing thing.

The third secret of Fatima was stored in the safe - 'die Seife' - of the bishop of Leira. Cp. the name of 'Nicolas Sarkozy' - which could mean such a box of metal wherein the secret was stored.

The role of the suck = ZUG is probably in that sucking of the divine. This could explain the two massacres on politicians in local parliaments - in Zug in Switzerland in 2001 and in Nanterre outside Paris in 2002.

The innermost essential symbol of the third secret - the cross upon which Christ was attached - is contained in the portuguese formulation in the description of Lucia as 'cruz de sobreiro' ('cross of cork-oak') - which here could be recognized as a 'soap-rear-o'. The 'cruz' could then be symbolized in what is called 'Badewanne' in german - the container holding the water - in the norwegian the same word ('badevanne[t]') means the water in the tub, not the tub itself.

The cork-oak of the cross seems to be politically interpreted as a wooden cork which can be put into an anus - for keeping the subjective world pumped-up and preventing that the air slips out again - and for political control generally. (Cp. the current 'jasmine' revolutions, which in theory could be an attempt to conduct a controlled deflation of the bubbles). Turning the phonological features around in the word ('cruz de sobreiro') takes it to the formulation 'help[ed] father on Vågstranda' - where Eidsvig had his oyster farm with metal wire running in parallels across the fjord inlet like strings in a piano frame. A landscape piano - and this could be a background of some piano names in MLR.

Eidsvig went bankrupt on his 70th birthday - and his three sons Björn, Arild and Per bought the firm from him.

I once wrote an analysis of some poems of Celan which seemed to be about things from Vågstranda - and hence it seemed to suggest that Celan could have been an agent. My analysis showed that he was not, even if it looked like.

The whole mythological circus from England and MLR could be an attempt to imitate the 'Wirbelwasser' when it is circulating in the tub before it is sucked into the darkness of Nothingness (or Nottingham).

'Seife Hue[t]' seems to be the summary of british aspirations for divine authority. It could be installed with 'tractor-knorrs' making 'divine earthquakes' (giving expression to 'holy wrath') and with satellite cameras as the divine eye from heaven. If 'Seife Huet' ('save the head') means 'the hue of the soap', its revelational character on the bubble could be a key word in the attempted generation of new nazism in Europe. We must hope that the plan is not to generate a Black Sea Loop by a mechanism of sucking from east to west across Europe, for example in an attempt to assign divine status to the british or other government.

Reaching far down on the back can be a movement entailing some strain of the muscles, like peeping in or rather out through Windows on an ordinary home computer. This strain on the muscles could perhaps even be compared with the concept of 'eine Tracht Prügel', cp. a 'suck' of a 'Flügel'.