3rd secret of Fatima aligned with Horace Ode I:1 mid stanza
John Bjarne Grover
This file aligns the mid stanza (4 lines) of Horace Ode 1.1 against the segmented text of the Fatima secret. The four lines of Horace are the following - plus preceding and following lines:
mercator metuens otium et oppidi
laudat rura sui; mox reficit rates
quassas indocilis pauperiem pati.
est qui nec veteris pocula Massici
nec partem solido demere de die
spernit, nunc viridi membra sub arbuto
stratus, nunc ad aquae lene caput sacrae.
The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on 13 July 1917.
"I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.
1
After the two parts which I have already explained,
= nec partem solido
neque pars solido |
- and not yet - a part, piece, portion, share, division, section - to make firm, make dense, solidify, compact, strengthen |
2
at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendor that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand:
= demere de die
demeo demereo demo de de2 dies dius dius2 divus divus2 |
- v. n., to go down, descend - to deserve well of - to take away, take off, subtract, remove, withdraw - down - from, away from, down from, out of - a day, civil day - godlike, divine, worshipful, adorable - [definition unavailable] - of a deity - a god, deity, divine being |
laudo ruro rus |
- to praise, laud, commend, honor, extol, eulogize, approve - to live in the country - the country, lands, fields, a country-seat, farm, estate (opp. urbs) |
sui suo sus suus |
- Himself, herself, itself, themselves - to sew, stitch, sew up, sew together - a swine, hog, pig, boar, sow - of oneself, belonging to oneself, his own, her own, his, her, its, their |
mox reficio ratis |
- soon, anon, directly, presently, by and by - to make again, make anew, reconstruct, remake, restore, renew, rebuild, repair, refit, recruit - a raft, float |
quasso quatio indocilis pauperies patior |
- to shake violently, toss, brandish, wave - to shake - not teachable, not to be taught, indocile - poverty, limited means - to bear, support, undergo, suffer, endure |
edo sum qui qui2 quis quis2 |
- to eat, consume - to be, exist, live - who? which? what? what kind of a? - in what manner? how? whereby? by what means? why? - who? which one? - any one, anybody, anything, some one, somebody, something |
neque veto poculum Massicus |
- and not yet - not to suffer, not to permit, to oppose, forbid, prohibit - a drinking-vessel, cup, goblet, bowl, beaker - of Mount Massicus in Campania |
How come this apparent association of the pope with the pig? I notice the possible role of the idea of 'sew-flesh' for the Kennedy assassination - it could be an old association which pertains to the holy role of a person living in flesh. The new testament is written in greek - which perhaps can be seen as a little surprising when the story was going in the hebrew language on background of the old testament. In norwegian language, 'greece' qua 'gris' = 'pig'. Notice also the greek 'Zeus'. It is of course well possible that this idea of Kennedy having organized the assassination himself for fleeing to Norway and there hiding under new cover could find an explanatory framework in just this text of Horace relative to the text of the famous third secret of Fatima. It may then be assumed that the text had leaked out (by x-ray methods) to administration after it was written down and deposited in the safe of the bishop of Leira (notice the same word play again: 'Leira' is norwegian for 'the clay' which here would mean 'the flesh). It is in this text compared with Horace that 'sew' or 'stich' associates with 'mirror': It can be noticed that the idea of Kennedy fleeing to 'Norway' would then find an interpretation in the apparent historic fact (conjectured here on basis of limited knowledge) that Kennedy seems to have got USA just involved in the Vietnam war (a few days earlier or so) when he was shot - as if this could have been a political reason for the assassination - and then it is notable that Vietnam is a sort of 'mirror image' to Norway on the globe.
sui suo sus suus |
- Himself, herself, itself, themselves - to sew, stitch, sew up, sew together - a swine, hog, pig, boar, sow - of oneself, belonging to oneself, his own, her own, his, her, its, their |
The idea of Kennedy as a 'sew-flesh trulte' would then derive from 'trulte' as this fourth sense of the word - 'of oneself, belonging to oneself, his own, her own, his, her, its, their' - in which case the whole complex could appear like being rooted in the fundamental question whether it would be permitted to build new people from scratch or make complete 'plagiarisms' of existing people by 'sewing flesh' together: Wouldnt this collide against fundamental concepts of divine sanction? It would then be the fourth meaning element 'Himself, herself, itself, themselves' which would be the real reason for this complex. Put differently - today we understand that the computer technology can come to lead to super-computers with logical circuits on molecule level so tightly packed that a computer of theoretic 'upper limit' of computation can be defined - say, when it can survey practically any part of the universe - in the sense that increasing its complexity even more will only slow down its efficiency - and then it turns out that this 'theoretically upper limit of computation' will come to look (in size and shape) like a human brain! That would mean that normal humans will be built from scratch in laboratories - and then the question of the Creation and divine status will come in a different light. That is when humans will spring forth 'from scratch' (say, on paper) deposited in a 'safe' of 'Leira' = 'the clay'. Is this even the 'Seif-e' of american TV soap series?
It can be noticed that this 'theoretically upper limit of computation' would necessarily have to mean 'from the viewpoint of the human reality'. Humans believe that birds have wings and the fact that small birds can fly across large oceans without resting or eating is evidence that they necessarily get their energies from a source unknown to humans. The human reality cannot explain this fact - there must be something 'beyond' the reality which we can conceive. Therefore humans believe that angels have wings - because they resemble birds in this evidential sense of it. Therefore also is it possible that birds look like they do only from the viewpoint of the limited human reality - in the reality of birds things may look very different and they believe e.g. that humans have wheels on their feet - like rollerskates, sort of - or 'funny hats' (like the one in the front of the big boat or in the mid of the lower row of this ancient egyptian illustration from the corridor in to the tomb of Antefoker) - which the birds look at and ponder when they go to work in the morning (or the souls look at when they are on their way in to the 'larger transcendent reality' of the tomb of Antefoker). It is this reality border which the new technology can come to transgress - and then clearly the question of the status of concepts of divine knowledge comes up - not the least since the computers can come to develop a spirituality transgressing the reality-border of humans and then it can come to get out of control and humans be reduced to poodles for the new reality. It may be a standard theory that humans sprang forth from apes in this way. Christianity may be concerned with just this - that Christ was a divine who took on the narrow and redundant shape of a human and the story of his life is then telling of what these human reality constraints are about.
Horace could in principle have written his Ode in the night when Jesus was born - cp. the 'Word' becoming 'flesh'.
See also e.g. "...sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God" relative to this illustration and this from the same Antefoker tomb: Notice also the 'sordidus' = 'dirty' Beethoven-like character in Diziani' artwork - it is known that half-eaten sandwiches were found underneath some Beethoven music notation sheets in his home (by some report) - a detail which History has preserved for some reason or other - and would this 'communion' underneath his music be called 'dirty' entertainment? Cp. the tuft hanging down onto his head - like that glass of History sprinkling the egyptian face. This could be telling of another aspect of the human reality - that History is something under the control of the same reality constraints and that is why Time has reduced certain parts of these wall paintings and retained others. That is the question why History has preserved just the known fragments of Heraclitus and not others - since it seems that the extant fragments in total seem to constitute one poetic unit of significant structure.
See e.g. also the Fatima text "...soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him..." relative to this detail from the Antefoker tomb.
The question whether the new computers will transcend the human reality can concern the status of the two computer glitsches discussed in this study - why do they take on such a humanoid form if they are true 'electronic glitsches'? But that is ultimately the question what is the character of the grammatical errors in my DDS.
It is clear that the idea of assigning rigid roles to individual humans is to narrow down the thought to fit the human reality - and that an artwork such as Diziani's of Horace's must be understood in the sense of describing these limitations not in order to succumb to them but on the contrary to be able to transcend them.
Sources:
Horatius Flaccus, Q.: Ode 1.1
Lucia, Sister: The three secrets of Fatima. In english translation on http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20000626_message-fatima_en.html.
© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 10 october 2023