Israel's attack on Hamas in Gaza on boxing day 2008

Israel's attack on Hamas in Gaza on boxing day 2008

John Bjarne Grover

Israel has been attacking Hamas in Gaza since about 26 or 27 December 2008 and according to my italian newspaper the operation is called 'Piombo fuoco' (the english name seems to be 'Cast Lead') which could mean something like 'Lead lushions', as far as I can understand. When this is an attack on the neighbours, there is something like my book title "Lead lushions in a bowl" in the name.

Why?

I have no idea what this is about and cannot know the real reason. I am not a supporter of violence and would say, whatever be the reason, that it should have been told publically instead of by way of violence.

I can try to make an analysis of some possible aspects of this possible link to me which goes as follows:

In november I made some breakthrough in my project in terms of recognition of a jewish-philosophical basis which lent rather decisive proof value to certain aspects of the meeting with the iranian in the park in Paris which can let me conclude with some certainty that it be about what I call a 'poetic revelation'. Which means that it was probably not a secret agent from a political party or whatever. This 'proof' was also essentially tied up to the structure in my poetic work and could be traced to a part of the diary which was introduced by a discussion of the morph HAM. Which means that when the attack on HAMas comes in connection with this use of my book title, there are reasons to wonder if the attack quite simply is an attempt to hijack my work.

England is possibly interested in that and the attack could be very simply on behalf of England. In order to hijack my work. No surprise that would be. 1-2-3 - which is one version of the real history, but hopefully not the only one.

However, the story goes about the status of islam - whether the islamic religion has a solution to the fundamental problems of Odda and my 'rathunt' memory from the time when Celan probably visited me there. If so, it means that there could be a solution for my essential problem relative to Israel to the extent that I be conceived of as an islamic palestinian.

The diary also contains a discussion under the date 20-21 January 1995 (mid point in Clinton's period!) which could be suggestive of a possible childhood injection of chemicals relative to that date.

Such injected chemicals would correspond to the presence of an alien system in the body - and hence a squeeze-out from the body of the original 'tenant', possibly for the purpose of finding spiritual refuge by the genetic origins (cp. the islamic issue). But that means that Gröver/'Mengele', if he injected such chemicals in me, would correspond to Israel in Palestine and I would be the palestinian refugees.

Now the 'good pretext' for such an attack on Hamas in this context could be that the identification of me as the jewish-genetic diaspora with the palestinian refugees would be the essential and apparently almost unsolvable problem. However, when I make decisive progress within the framework of a jewish-philosophical basis it serves to identify me as essential jewish - in spite of the quasi-unsolvable historic background - and if Israel attacks HAM-as on precisely this basis, it is not the jewish diaspora they attack but the palestinians. This could have been intended to detach me from the palestinian solution in order to relieve the palestinians from the burden of being identified as the unsolvable problem of me. And so forth: There are some 'nice-looking' pretexts to find in those regions.

However, since this attack of 2008 is a case of violence it is likely that the pretext only covers a more illegitimate reason since violence hardly leads to anything good.

One of the big problems - if this progress in jewish-philosophical interpretation of my work is the reason - would be that I have not yet lifted these studies outside my computer. Which means that if this is the socalled 'good pretext' reason, then it is based on secret surveillance of my private workspace. Then it is already a bad reason: If it should be telling of plans for heavy abuse from other states of the material I have reently worked out on my computer, then Israel should tell it publically and not converted it into violence if that is the story.

They have not answered from A.T.Smail in London. It is more than half a year since I sent my "I tell you, Estunates" to legal deposit via Smail's agency (and british library) and there should have been a receipt.

The pretext seems to rest on the important assumption that Jensen was Mengele and therefore Mengele was 'Gensen' (see below on the film). But this is precisely the reason why I went to the israeli embassy in Berlin in early 2004. When they did not answer, there is the danger in the present situation that my intellectual achievements could have been hijacked by Israel for pushing me into the role of Satan as a common enemy for all jews - and hence I am the alien chemicals in the blood. That could be just the strategy of England.

Gro Harlem Brundtland was WHO-chief in Geneva - and Quisling was an envoy from Geneva in 1924. Cp. 'Jevanord' - as the reason for the 'Nord-Ost' theatre terror in Moscow?

Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barak are essential names in the bombing of Hamas. When Benazir Bhutto was bombed a year ago, there is the 'verrückt' interpretation of this as 'bena sir p hytta' = 'the bones say in the hut' as if british agents should hold a human 'monkey' in a hut and now and then help themselves with another extremity for the 'hunger'. The bones left after the 'dogs' have eaten the meatbone are desperately trying tell about the hut where their genetic origins are - but nobody hears the 'barking' of the bones? But this is an idea which is so 'verrückt' that it works 'rückwärts' for a possible - and it seems even likely - british strategy on the british-logical form 'if it is british, then it is swindle' which works 'rückwärts' on the form 'if it is swindle, then it is british' designed for a british-hypocritical crusade against swindle all over the world - 'the only morally upright nation' - and whenever they find a piece of true and real and genuine 'swindle' - which in british parlance perhaps quite simply means a piece of 'intellectual property' - they can plant their british flag on it by this hypocritical strategy. Hah! This is swindle (= 'intellectual achievement') and therefore british.

If it is verrückt, then it is austrian. Hence 'E-HAM-gasse'. Which gives rückwärts british - not the least via the non-return or even not-reverge of the Finanzierungsbeitrag etc.

If this is the background for the bombing of Benazir Bhutto, then the morph E-HUT is possibly not coincidental. But that is just when secret surveillance of my computer as the background of the bombing of Hamas in Gaza means exactly the opposite of what it feels like from a jewish viewpoint: While it feels like the final breakthrough in the struggle against british control with Israel, it could be not much more than the final handover of the keys to England by this trick of secret surveillance of me. Cheap theft by burglary is the name of it if surveillance is the origin of the story.

'Ehud Dolmetsch' would then be Quisling in Gorkij (the key doesn't fit) in 1924, as if Lenin were then already held as monkey in a hut or if he were taken prisoner for such hut existence. 'Ehud Barak' could be the breakthrough - for example it could be about the 'breakthrough in cognitive science' which the attack on Trotskij entailed - with the later reflex in Chomsky - or in terms of the massacre on the Romanovs. Or was it Laura Devold later Eidsvig who fired the gun of Quisling against Lenin - for precisely the reason that Lenin's bolsheviks had massacred the Romanovs? Then the 'E-hut' factor could be in the status of my diary 1994-95. Is it the plan to launch Chomsky once again as the author of my recent breakthrough in jewish philosophy related to the 'rainbow' phenomenon in poetic-linguistic structure? This 'rainbow' is the great discovery of mine which could have been the plan for such a strategy if Israel acts on behalf of powers which can promise security in return.

But this could - if it is a story based on secret surveillance of my computer - mean simply the final handover of the keys to England. The diary 1994-95 seems to have been stolen from my computer possibly as early as 1995 and seems to have been the template for the attack on USA 11 September 2001. That was terror. It was the terror on the 'funhattan' towers and it was the 'balloons' of masturbation-pumping of diamond-mine-chemicals of Lambertsville into the Pentagon penis which creates the identity of masturbation of identity from one person into the system of another by verboten chemicals which is an imitation of the israeli occupation of the palestinian identity. Landmark identity. Manhattan 2001 was Landmark terrorism - not Darwin - and Landmark is a name in the official family of mine. The embassy has not answered - it does not matter if they know the identity or not - if they do not know the identity of Jensen Gröver Mengele they should have answered in any case with a thanks for your letter and particularly thanks for your book if I should not be identified as the Landmark terrorism. What about my diary novel book? Will there be a thanks from israeli side or will there be only tanks against the palestinians - after they have used the same book for a final breakthrough?

It is a breakthrough for jewish philosophy and identity - and if that is what the government of Israel serves for the israelites it may feel right. In particular since it entails a solution to the potentially difficult relation between the israelites and the diaspora as far as a 'verboten' program is concerned. Perfect, of course. But not so if it is based on surveillance of my computer and if it serves to relegate me to the role of Satan. Then it is only the final breakthrough for 'verboten' under an Israeli state flag.

Darwin seems to be a landmark of british scholarship, british intellectualism. One notices the similarity of Darwin with the paternal superego in Tiepolo in Ss.XII Apostoli. That could be SS - with Himmler on the top. Quite simply modelled in Charles Darwin! (I recall Trygve Madsen mentioned for me in probably the first half of the seventies that 'Norsk Spraakraad' was abbreviated 'NS' like 'Nasjonal Samling' and 'Spraaklig Samling' was 'SS' - could be he earned another star there in my estimation - such incredibly interesting comments!).

The 'masturbation' of chemicals is in my diary in the night between 20 and 21 January 1995 - which was the exact mid point in Clinton's first period just as it was in Eisenhower's in 1959. But that is just the 20 January which Celan writes about in his 'Der Meridian'. The events described in my diary novel took place while Gro Harlem Brundtland was prime minister in Norway and could have been in preparation of her leadership in WHO 1998-2003. It is not impossible that this 20 January 1995 was a part of what even could have been a planned 'ejection' of me from the same house in April when I went out the door and met Ragna Gröver in the street outside - as if she should have been Celan in 1960 - on that place in Krumgata which corresponds to the jewish community house in Seitenstettengasse - which was the place where I delivered two letters in 2006 after which the bombing of Lebanon took place. There was also a visit to Krumgata from the police in the morning 21 January 1995, and a police search with electric torches in the area around those times: They were combing every part of the district one dark evening or afternoon, looking into holes and garbage cans and everywhere, as if they were searching for a lost cat. The details in the searches could make it relevant to associate with 'Aktion Reinhard'. Then in April Ragna Gröver came up Krumgata after I had gone out. There was even a walk of mine in downtown Oslo where I met a series of people with the same grey chin beard as can be spotted Heddon-on-the-Wall (cp. foot-and-mouth in England 2001) in the Tiepolo at Zattere - I think I counted 9 occurrences on one walk and at least some of those could have been searching me more than I searched them.

Is the famous article on prefrontal cortex as the source of schizophrenia (it was, if I remember right, this article Geir Kirkeböen gave me in the nineties) a case of british scholarship? Then one can perhaps wonder whether it simply is swindle - for example if I were victim of mutilation of my prefrontal cortex in narcosis in 1982 or even 1975. (And then of course forced hospitalization in Bergen was not the thing!) I suppose it is hard to prove that the prefrontal cortex hypothesis is wrong even if one can produce data which tells that it is right. And if the data in the article are outright swindle, the purpose of it could be to label my work as swindle - and therefore british. But I don't know if this idea of mutilation of a part of my cortex has any basis in reality.

In short, if the israeli strategy is to accept the secrecy on breach of human rights and laws (for example instead of answering from the israeli embassy or by using information tapped from my computer), it means an accept of the british slogan on swindle, and it means relegating me to the role of Satan for solving the problem. "That is only one person and it could pay off for solving the problems for many persons". That is not human rights! It would be the british strategy on swindle and therefore the verboten program with Israel as the spearhead.

Politics thinks power and that is so to speak the opposite of intellectual integrity. It could be the key to a british 'empire'.

And so I have to continue with the web page. I could even wonder if that could have been the reason for the events in recent weeks - to prevent me from getting off the web.

Do I have the right to be where I am living now? I have not yet had it confirmed that the gas bill has been paid. I must suppose that it is. If it is not, then it could be that various paragraphs could be combined for the conclusion that I have not the right to be on the place where I live.

I recently installed a SATA hard drive and reinstalled programs - with registration - and there was a Santa going mad with massacre on 8 persons in Christmas. It may be that there are cases of british poetry that are syntactically and distributionally the same as british prose, but that is not the case for my poetry. But there is a common jewish-philosophical basis for my poetry and prose.

A british crusade against swindle could look much like the battle of the Good against the Evil wherein no cruelties would be left unused for the heroic purposes. How long will the battle last untill the last Evil is exterminated? It may have to go on forever if Evil will not give in to the super-pressure - a formidable 'balloon' that could be.

It would also look much like administrative logic against poetic since it seems that administrative logic cannot understand its own deficiencies. The apparently gigantic projects on Chiesa di SS.XXI Apostoli (at least since Himmler's SS but possibly earlier as well) is telling of the need for bringing secrecy in administration to an end. It is not likely that international secret service understands poetic logic however much they may think that they do.

Hitler-raped, Mengele-tortured, lobotomized... Is it not likely that I have written this book? If Erdogan in Turkey means the Phenergan medicine which helped against allergics in my childhood, it could even mean 'Esterwegen' if I were given Estrogen or oestrogen or Oysterogen-etics instead of Phenergan - could be it helped and silenced the whiner. That would have been verrückt medicination, of course. Esterwegen was, I think, as well as I can, the first camp established by Himmler - even before Dachau. It meant that Dachau was not first. There must have been something prefrontal to it. Frankly, I believe that this theory is pure swindle. I cannot remember anything such. Esterwegen seems to have been the first Lager but was dissolved in 1936 and reopened in 1937 and then it was no longer the first! It was way down in the priority list! Phenergan medicine = prefrontal cortex? Prenatals? This was just after Christmas, I think, and not before.

Well then it could be that other story - of Benazir Bhutto 2007 in preparation of an israeli strike against Hamas in 2008 - and my timing of my intellectual progress, hampered by much struggle to find a place to live and so forth during 2008 - would have landed my discovery towards the end of 2008 - and then the timing could have been 'coincidental', as is the theme of the book.

I do not know if my computer is tapped or not but have to take that for a very likely possibility. Something tells me that modern surveillance technology is not dependent on a radio sender on the motherboard and can of course hide in a nearby gondola.

Briefly, I do not know what the story in the middle east is now - but I have made these considerations because there seems to be some link to me. I have not got an answer from A.T.Smail and could be the only sensible solution will be to consider anything swindle if it is british.

Benazir Bhutto could in theory have been assassinated for this 'breakthrough in cognitive science' since Trotskij. Little me, with all my problems, against the superpowers - that is not fair. Where are those who are able to understand that I could be in need of some help for finding a publisher? People believe that this gigantissimo monkey business on me is run by my friends? Hollywood and so forth... If more or less all administrations are involved in this mythological monkey business at least in the sense of not telling me about it, it only means that all of them cannot be counted as my friend as long as this is going on. And where are my friends? Where is the garage publisher who can provide that teeny weeny little 'social element' needed to get out of the encapsulation? Am I suppose to rely on a 'lucky strike' in my first attempt to find a publisher - otherwise the world simply goes to where-you-know while the russian publisher I sent the manuscript holds the submission for half a year before it is returned with the comment that they only publish hobby books (I am not so good at russian and could not have guessed that)? Could be I am even kept on a low budget for making it difficult to find solutions which can 'rescue the world'. Little me means also the one who could have been Hitler-raped, Mengele-tortured, lobotomized and who is not the most salonfähig. It is pathetically easy to solve all problems by declaring a common enemy in the form of a Satan - and that could be just the strategy of UK/US inviting Israel to join the program.

Since neither the israeli embassy in Berlin nor the jewish museum in Athens have replied or sent me the promised letter, a very possible conclusion to the present situation in the middle east could be that the superpowers are planning to launch my achievements under the banner of Noam Chomsky, whether in person or in the name of his followers. But that 'breakthrough in cognitive science' would have been during WWII! I don't even know if I am entitled by the law to live on the place where I live.

I can add to these comments that Gröver/'Mengele', as far as I remember now, had put out (possibly for making me find it) on a table or bookshelf the novel "Smuglere" ('Smugglers') by Arthur Omre. I read the book, about somebody smuggling something, but now see that it could mean 'Swindlers' by the author 'Arti Rompe' = 'funny bottom', which could be a colleague of 'Lobsang Rampa', the 'plumber' (not 'smuggler') from Liverpool.

One of the scholars at the literary institute in Oslo when I studied there in 1982 was 'Jan Dietrichson' who - although in other respects I suppose he was totally unrelated to this story - reminded me a little of the character 'Crabbins' of the 'literary circle' in the film 'Der dritte Mann', the one with the stream of consciousness and the cultural re-education section. Even Jack Straw could be a little similar. 'Da n ji driksen' means 'when he gave the tips', when he gave the change money. But that would be the moment of the car accident in the film (with the hidden theme of Celan as my father after Vienna and Bachmann), which could mean that the converse or 'spooned' version could be the scene from the meeting in the 'Oxford' sort of movement scenes of 47:37-47:47, the ten seconds when Holly Martin gives a speech for the britons, displayed as Josef Harbin giving a short speech in the telephone, as the moment of giving the tips. (Cp. the idea of laser-beaming behind the skull - I was in narcosis in the summer 1982 and in 1975). Ten seconds = Julie Ege? I notice that Ege + Hamas = Ehamgasse. (Which could mean that the current attack on Hamas has something to do with 'Jack Straw' - such as e.g. on 8 June 2001 or the royal massacre in Nepal?) An 'arti rompe' is a bottom with a funny or appealing 'swing', as if there are 'tense econds' there - such curves as e.g. the 'wellrounded' Julie Ege could be seen to have had. This is what Josef Harbins = Josef Mengele tells in the phone in those ten seconds: "Bring the car - and anyone else would like to come - don't be long - uh!" There is the fascinating 'turkey' hat in the moments before 47:37 which is reminscent of the scene at 29:29 when Martins tries to get in to Dr.Winkel. It seems to be the same old british theme of royal power at the fingertips. This 'Josef Harbins' (disguised as the rumanian Popescu) is likely to be the character of Josef Mengele (with that funny ear-cut) who was out for the 'dong'.

The character 'Crabbins' seems to be introducing Nelly Sachs (cp. this photo from the film with the photo of Sachs from age 16) in the scenes in the hotel - but the point is likely to emphasize the similarity with Lucia in the Tiepolo in Chiesa di Ss.XXII Apostoli. However, after Celan wrote his poem 'Die Schleuse' in 1960, it is well possible that one has taken this Crabbins to be the character of 'Kaare Fylling' as the real father of mine. Grover Ing? Crabbin Inch? That could add to the largescaled projects of labelling Celan a secret agent - and here one could even have tempted to suggest that Sachs had posed with hat in 1907 or thereabout for looking like this painting in Venice. The solution to this is likely to be that Himmler called SS for just that on basis of the photo of Sachs from 1907 and its similarity with the Tiepolo in SS.XII Apostoli. And that is the reason for this scene in 'Der dritte Mann' - and then Fylling could have been assigned this role after Celan's poem of 1960. Fylling would otherwise, before this, have been in the role of representing Chamberlain.

Conclusion: The attack on Hamas could be for the good-looking pretext of attempting to detach the jewish-genetic diaspora from the role of palestinians and thereby provide for a relief of the unsolvability in the situation and hence prepare for a permanent solution which can have some lasting value. But if that is on basis of secret surveillance (and the correlations with my computer is not a welltimed coincidence), then it is not likely to be a good solution - even if there should have been 'good intentions' coupled with 'military logic'. Then one could rather suspect that there could be british interests behind the attack - for reasons which could be combined by e.g. 1) a wish to hijack my work and claim it to be british ('swindle', that means), and I notice the 'yar leber U-vig' and 'don abrosiac' in the Tiepolo, although one must emphasize that the host is going in and not out of the mouth of Lucia. 2) a wish to prevent the diary from being published since that could be too revealing for the 'project' of 11 September 2001. The attack on USA that day can be seen to contain a 'balloon' with super-pressure in the sense of crystalline chemicals in the diamond mine in Lambertsville and a masturbated penis called Pentagon representing the invasion of the body in terms of an alien presence by such chemicals. In addition to these 'balloons', there are the 'funhattans' and hence a sort of birthday = Bush-day party. It is difficult to believe that this really is the purpose with the four jet crashes.

One can observe that the essential dialogue with Paul Hörbiger porter in the film Der dritte Mann is displaced for purposes of swap of roles - and it is an interesting question whether it is possible today to have it verified with certainty whether this even was on the first reels - the 'reel whirl' of film. More acute is the question whether the word 'Pentagon' (close to 42.666%) was in the film "There's no business like show business" from 1954 - or whether that has been added to the DVDs later. Could be this parallelism with 'Der dritte Mann' could be a topic of british interest.

In short, I don't know why my title seems to be involved in the military action against Gaza, but I am particularly not interested in being conceived of as the one the bombing is carried out for - and then there comes a british 'ghurka' disguised as e.g. a Hamas activist for targeting me? I hope that is not the reason for the title of the military operation in Gaza these days - and I hope there are no plans for a gunman from the british government for the purposes of a british abuse of my work - cp. the story of the possibly stolen diary and 11 September 2001. And that could be a secret pretext for new attacks on Gaza - under the pretext of me in the role of Verboten.

I think other nations should be a little outspoken on the issue of british swindle if that is what is going on now.

Let me sum this up: I am not involved in anything like politics. I am only doing my creative poetic work in much solitude and think that somebody should help me having it published. There seems to be a lot of 'business' around me - possibly including theft of manuscripts and assignment of mythological roles for investments in politics and so forth - that is none of my business and it is only a problem for me. In order to try and make clear what is what, I have been writing this website and have wasted a lot of time on that. If the attack on Hamas in Gaza could be interpreted as e.g. a fantasy-attack on 'Ehamgasse' which even could mean 'Buckingham', that is none of my business. Why could there be such 'fantasies'? I don't know - but I notice that I made an analysis on my website which pointed to the royal massacre in Nepal of 2001 as potentially being about a 'genetic bias'. That is plain neutral analysis. I am not involved in political business. I say things right out and that is exactly the opposite of political business.

There has been no answer whatsoever to these political discussions of mine. A lonely struggle with the windmills... And now they are afraid that I am going to stop putting new pages of outspoken truth out on the internet every day? I hope that is not the reason for the attack on Hamas. I am tired to the bone of this website. It was an accident that I discovered the news of the israeli attack - and the santa massacre - and I am now struggling the best I can to avoid the news not the least in order to get off the daily web publishing and the 'mass communication' with the media. The conclusion to this could be that nobody told him the relevant newspieces. Nobody told anything. Don't blame me if this ends in catastrophe.

If Tut-an-Camin was launched by british administration for giving historic weight and depth and glory to Bjarne Eidvig, eventually perhaps to be lifted onto his brother Aron Eidsvig, perhaps even by way of the genocide on 700.000 Tutsies in Rwanda, then it is high time to tell the true story. And continue it untill all of it is told.

In short, I hope these considerations I have made here are totally irrelavant to the situation in Israel and Gaza for the time being. We must hope that there is the chance for just that.

Let me add that it seems that much secret service could have been invested into creating the impression that Celan's poem 'Sprachgitter' is evidence of him being a secret agent due to the reference to this Tiepolo in Venice. As my studies have shown, this phenomenon is not a proof of such agency but rather of the opposite - that he was not a secret agent. If it proves anything, it could be that it proves the futility of investments into secret projects which cannot be corrected by outside common sense and deeper understanding than the secret services themselves are in command of.

I looked over some old notes and found the information again that the office I shared with Diesen in 1989 had been used by not only Christian-Emil Ore but also Marit Holter who was in with infant on the arm. I think she used the place when Ore was away but she was on maternity leave when I used it - something like that. Gröver/'Mengele' told me once that he had got 'innstilling' to a handshake with the king in Oslo because of his good exams at the university. "Bare tolvere" = 'only 12-ers' he told me (12 was top mark). 'Bare tollere' would mean 'only customs people' and could be an allusion to how they could know that Celan had been there: He had been identified in the customs control. I suppose he had not and this is what they made up afterwards. It must be admitted that Marit Holter reminded me a little of PLC whom I first suspected of the telephone terror 1986-88 - and when 'Dag Diesen' probably means '3 september 1960' = 'sedje trept-ember sittin next to', it could have been a possibly wellplanned story. Gröver/'Mengele' told me about 'bare tolvere' probably in 1986 or before, could be down in the seventies, and the story of with 'innstilling' and handshake was old - could be even in the sixties. This means that it is well possible that neither Holter nor Diesen - and one could perhaps add Ore as well - have any other affiliation with the story than their names and interests and they could have been manouvred into these offices by long-term planning.

There were rumours that Jörg Haider had been into a bar on his way home in the evening 10 October 2008 and somebody could have put the drug called 'ghb' (in german it is called 'Kot') in his drink. It leaves no traces in the blood but is apparently a hallucinogenic drug which can be bought on the internet. Sounds strange. Although this could have been an allusion to 'Knut Gribb', it could also be an allusion to a 'teasious' comment I once got in a car when driving past 'Kåten' - the word 'understellsbehandling'.

'Understell' is similar to 'vintertöy[et]' ('winter clothes'), which by some rewrite (= 'behandling') can come out as 'du er jöde' (cp. the role of circumcision). I don't know if it would apply to a 'Jar connection' (cp. 'Sarajevo'). 'Dårlig gjort' seems to have been a concept applied to me - or even my name.

There could have been much speculation on what Celan could have said to me in 1960. One good guess could have been e.g. this 'du er jöde' = 'you are a jew'. It could have been a guess e.g. from my experience of 'winter clothes' (around the same times, or a little later in the year of 1960).

'A talpok között' could be a hungarian variant of 'understellsbehandling'. 'Under stellebord-kanten' could mean somebody who puts a 'fish finger' inside a body opening of an infant e.g. while changing diapers. I have, as far as I can remember, done babysitting (small children) only at the Aukrusts - at least once on Grorud - but of course I did no harm to the child[ren]. If there should have been a report to police 'just in case' - the child was whining and they had the feel that there was something there... and this 'uncle'... diagnosed with schizophrenia... - it would have had to be them (I have no idea if they have ever made any such report on me). It could perhaps have been used as pretext for surveillance. World campaign against pederasts etc. Then the story from Ehamgasse 23 could be about handshake and joking etc. - a la Danderyd Jensen Harlem, a story which probably was a matter of such handshake-joking etc. (There were no such stories in Ehamgasse but the names were there). In which case the questioning by police outside Hörbiger about 'talking to children' (fingering, putting key into hole, turning it around etc - even the Hörbiger camera could have been used to survey the turnarounds of the housekeys) could have been about such a story - for which imagined blame could have been put on me if it really were about a sort of 'Knut Gribb' = 'GHB'. Via Manhattan 2001 and Ingrid Betancourt, there could have been quite a pressure on this intrigue - via Celan 1960 and a conjectured comment. The rewrite 'vintertöyet' / 'du er jöde' could resemble the one of 'Ragna Yklem' (Gröver/'Mengele' suffered from high blood pressure = 'höyt boldtrykk' and 'Ykk' is the standard trouser fly zipper producer in Norway) vs. 'Agnar Mykle', cp. 'Ragna Nykler' = 'ragna keys'.

Would a report from the parents to police be false testimony? If there should have been such a report, which I would doubt, I suppose it would have been on the form 'we don't know really - this is just in case - the child was Wiening and seemed to have a pain in the bottom...'

According to the Austrian 'Staatsvertrag' of 1955, it is forbidden by law to be a nazi in Austria and the law or rather 'state contract' really requires that nazis be 'liquidated'. The state authorities are really obliged to liquidate nazis if they want to remain independent. If the (british?) theory of prefrontal cortex as the reason for schizophrenia is swindle, and indeed one should compare with the only source given in the Oslo Report #3 (which seems to mean Gudmund Harlem) which is Bell Syst.Tech.J.Jan.39, p.222 (cp. 'Pre-Front Tex J.Cor 39, p.222', and I once met a person in Stoat Street, and even the ambassador to Norway in 1999 was called 'Hermeline' - not to speak of the rewrite of 'Bell Syst.Tech.J.Jan...' into 'Rekustad dr.Verboten...'!, 'pre-front exchequer' etc), a mutilation by laser tools for making a 'third eye' (Gro Harlem Brundtland lost two foreign ministers from her government - Knut Frydenlund while sitting on the toilet ring and Johan Jörgen Holst in bed with somebody, both due to a sudden cerebral haemorrhage, up to Rwanda cp. Tut-and-Camin = Bjarne Eidsvig possibly for the historic restoration of Hitler - as a 'paternal superego'?) would be a case of theoretic 'SVINDEL' = 'svin-del' (to the extent that it be related to a diagnosis of schizophrenia) which here would be a 'swiny' body part going inwards, not the typical outwards penis. But that means that the 'swine' could be what is called 'purken' in norwegian, 'the female pig' (cp. 'Judensau'), which also is a word used for 'the police' = 'politiet' = 'Tiepolo'. Cp. 'she-pig' = 'skipigg' = 'skistav' - we had a neighbour 'Skistad' in Molde - he was a producer of ice cream.

This means that there is the theoretical possibility for an intrigue by way of state institutions - the police and a diagnosis in a state hospital. These would be the parts of 22 November 1999 when my computer seems to have been burglared after I had been driven by police to the hospital.

It would have been the (british?) article or theory on damaged prefrontal cortex as reason for schizophrenia which could be used for lending pretext to activating such a surveillance machine: The suspicion would have been due to the alleged scientific FACT (as tells the article, if I recall it right) that such 'third eye' inevitably leads to schizophrenia. As far as I remember, one could point to a statistic majority of schizophrenics suffering from a deficit in the prefrontal cortex (but I don't know how they found the test group - if they have counted schizophrenics who already had been treated with lasers for various 'problems' and 'difficulties'). And then one looks up a list of symptoms and finds that the schizophrenic perhaps cannot remember this due to 'attention failure' - formerly what people who had seen too much Hitchcock imagined as 'split mind' with the one half not being able to remember what the other half did, as if the one half were a secret agent and the other half were not, and this 'two-life' problem could have applied even to such fingering called 'grafs' in norwegian - the Aukrusts later moved to a new address with a relevant name - and if the person does not even know about this third eye himself there is reason for 'third-eye-bekymring'. 'Dårlig gjort' seems to have been a concept applied to me - or even my name - and could mean 'john gröver'. All this would have been in a closed system of secrets and institutionalized suspicion which the person (me?) could not protect himself against. I have no idea if this really was going on - or if there had been such 'reports' on me. If so, could I see the report please? Well if he is diagnosed with schizophrenia he cannot - according to the list of common symptoms for such cases - assess the reality in this himself... And so forth. It would be a secret fact that 'third eye mutilation/treatment' had taken place, it would be a secret fact that such a report had been made, and so forth. It all rests on the theory of damaged prefrontal cortex as reason for schizophrenia. Which could be quite simply british, for all I know.

One can guess that political strategies with 'turnaround' will not be content with 180 degrees - not even 360. How far can they go? Petter Andre Syversen...? Perhaps the news will leak out one days that that there is a crisis in England and the secret services at the banks of the Thames have factually couped the power and there is not much the government can do about it - except their last resource which is the military forces. Eventually they have no other choice than to bomb the headquarter at the Thames and with it all the old secrets about Beowulf and Behistun and Tut-an-Camin and Darwin and all that. (The WWI battle of 'Tannenberg' probably means 'tarmen-berg' = 'Darwin-Charles' = 'Klipra connection'). Then history is closed behind them as if it were flushed down the toilet. Then it would be 'Done Gröver'.

I started my poetic revolution from Vilnius and sent some emails to the Poetry Society in London, in spite of the fact that I had not got an answer (e.g. to the book I sent them). After some emails I wondered if the system functioned at all and asked in yet another email if they had received them. There was no answer. Could be I tried once before I had to stop. I 2003 I spent some weeks in London and did not go into the Poetry Society before I left the country. They are not obliged to answer and of course they are not 'obliged' to take part in my poetic revolution either. Nobody was ever obliged to take part in a revolution - that is what a revolution is. In 2005 or 2006 I sent them a postcard with a poem of mine on it - and the most horrendous mudcake was returned with a story on TV about a scandal in the training of royal marines.

If 'Ehamgasse' could have been a part of the installation of a new 'Klipra connection' type of link to UK/US, the considerations here could of course be a part of the concepts invoked. That does not have to mean that there has been a report on me to the police - which would have been a false report if it were not only gastalk about 'bekymring' just in case and so forth - but it seems that 'key-turning' and 'putting-into-holes' etc were a part of the environments and potential target of the camera which surveyed the area and probably could not escape surveillance of the housedoor.

In my diary novel 1994-95 (the novel called 'The Dreamer'), which seems to have been burglared from my computer down in the nineties, I refer to a scene in my first grade class where each of the pupils should paint a little part on a big paper to be put up on the wall. I painted a black polar bear.

I don't know how Harlem relates to Manhattan - if it is a part of it or the other side.

There may be many people who have been in narcosis and who could have got a third eye without knowing it. Then very little is needed for putting the institutional machine into function for putting a Manhattan on them. It was in 1974 that 'Laser Ran' published the book about the 'Jerusalem of Lithuania' - cp. 'je rusa lem of lit hu an i a'.

To repeat, I have no data which could tell that the Aukrusts have reported me to the police with suspicion of fingering with their children. In particular, I have no reason to believe that there could have been a reason for it. It is this potential mixing of fact and fiction - one should not take Knut Gribb ('Knut Vulture', cp. characteristic nose) to be telling of this situation. It would certainly have been 'dårlig gjort' to ask me to be babysitter only for getting a chance to report me to the police afterwards. Would the Tiepolo on Zattere - the Madonna of the rosary - be a case of 'babysitting'? It is Lucia in Ss.XII Apostoli who is sitting - but the baby is on Zattere.

'Ta-over-s' can mean clothes, something covering, or it can mean putting the hand(s) over something. Or simply coup. Or 'take from the ovaries'. 'Twin ta-over-s' could be 'vint[er] clothes' or it can be that 'buksebak' - the part of trousers covering the bottom - which covers the 'twin buttocks' and the 'win[d]' there. Or simply the idea of making doubles from ovary columns, if that is the method. This would be the symbolism of Celan on Adorno when he left Sils Maria before Adorno arrived in the summer 1959 - and hence it could have meant 'San Pantalon'. Szondi and Bollack would rather mean the two Tiepolos in Venice. In short, the whole construction could be about Venice - plus the oarlock architecture. If Lambertsville and Pentagon means 'Dr.Verboten's injection of chemicals, such as I could have got on 20 January 1959 in Hammerfest (Celan's 'Der Meridian'), the Manhattan towers could have been about 'a rape of me by Hitler'. 'Babysitting' is about temporary custody. 'A rape of me by Hitler' could in theory mean that I raped Hitler when I was babysitting 'by' him, but maybe this is not an interesting analysis. I could have been sitting 'by' him when I was a baby, though. A babysitter... If the plan of 2001 was to dump the blame for the aircrashes on me, being in bad mood after that mistreatment or something like that, there could have been a logic like this in it. However, the 'third eye' is not present in the terror. Unless it could be 'institutionalized' somehow.

'Bra skrevet' = 'well written'.
'Brask revet' = 'forehead torn'.
'Brass krevet' = 'brass demanded'.

"I need a publisher" in norwegian is "jeg trenger en forlegger" = "I need a publisher", "I need a bedside rug", "I need a doormat".

It is likely that Celan showed me a copy of Sachs' "Sternverdunkelung" with the photo of her and said that this is your mother. (My mother, that means here, and she still is).

The photo of Sachs in that book is what surfaced in the revelation in the tree in Vilnius some days after 11 September 2001. The revelation photo shows the book that Celan showed me, with her name printed on the front page.

But how come even nature follows so closely to what the three year old boy saw in 1960? As the revelation told, it seems to be a matter of what could look like a 'mushroom history in the memory'. Or even 'nuclear history in the memory'.

Why don't people answer? Is it that they believe that I am CIA, so to speak? Why should they answer when I do not even answer my own mother - Nelly Sachs, was it? In Labraaten 58, was it? There is a mirror stage there (as Gore could be about) and an Aktion Reinhard there and so forth and so forth and these things are not on the rational level of thought and so forth and so forth... And people could be speculating: 'And even though she is not as popular as she were and her books do not sell so well any longer, one can understand the reason (Aktion Reinhard etc) but one cannot really expect to get an answer if one does not even answer one's own mother' etc etc. I mean, this is not my view, it is possibly others' ideas, but how can I tell them without understanding other people?

Could be access to the secret archives dug down in the ground (in London and elsewhere) could make it possible to restore the true picture of reality, the inner and the outer, but the problem arises when the categories used for thinking about it have been changed and are hard to restore even though the material basis for them could still exist. Could be that is why the name was Gori.

In short, if Celan brought a copy of Sachs' "Sternverdunkelung" for showing me the picture of her and her name and for telling what she was writing, he would likely have brought it in a plastic bag (norwegian 'plastikkpose'): That could be the 'plastic pose' on top of the stairs one evening in Labraaten 58 when I went up the stairs and there stood Gröver/'Mengele' - next to the 'Kinsarvk' ceramic plate on the wall - with a strangely deformed face, as if he had stuffed it with silicons and other material and had turned it 15 degrees off the outer mask. (I never articulated the idea that it could have been another person who could have stepped in the veranda door for a brief performance). I did not look so closely at the strange phenomenon but just went into the living room and presumed that he had eaten too many Rohypnols before going to bed. If this was the 'plastic pose', with a strange phenomenon inside, it could even be the background of the 'Paust case' - where I came up the staircase and saw the plastic pose there. It could mean this plastic bag of Celan with the book of Sachs inside on 3 September 1960, and the reason for it as a political project could be the same as for Manhattan 2001 - a divide-and-conquer strategy on the jewish-genetic diaspora. Could it be that the purpose with the Paust case quite simply is to make me believe that it was not Paul Celan but a chap from POT who was there in 1960? There is no purpose in that, of course.

Two stories: I once lived in a little hut north of Oslo in the district not far from Sinober and Sandermosen and thereabout (cp. 'Manhattan' and 'Movatn'). The hut was on the site of a house. The owner was a friendly person who once came over to me with a plate with a dish of beef and a glass of red wine, and I certainly believe that it was for being nice. His wife was suffering from some gradually progressing disease. The Aukrusts once visited me when I lived there and the owner went by - his T-shirt happened to have the text "I'm sex-mad. Try me". That certainly was not a spy message to the Aukrusts, it was just a texted T-shirt, but one can perhaps put sense into it if one wants - that is in fact what it tells. I am not saying that this near-'Sinober' story is the one of 'Benazir Bhutto', but if I am the centre of attention in intrigue-making, for example with a british taint, one can of course add the story. I once met the owner as he came out from a telephone box outside my home on Kampen in 1992-1993 (the house called 'Slottet' = german 'Schloss' which means both 'castle' and 'lock', while in norwegian the word 'schloss' can mean 'boxing day'). I used that telephone 'boxing' regularly. For example, I used it for talking briefly with Ragna Gröver in the context of the story with the 100.000 NOK offered on Clinton's inauguration day (as a pre-inheritance, not about a 'skjenk' = 'sideboard'). Then I met her again briefly in Krumgata some weeks after 20 January 1995 after she had been on my door in the autumn before.

'Ragna Nykler' = 'Ragna Keys' (cp. Agnar Mykle and his 'röd-Erubin') could be whenever she stands in front of the housedoor for turning them around, like one does in front of Ehamgasse 23. There is a neighbour with a view to the door - except when the 'broom' = 'gyvel' blossoms - it is between the neighbour's window and the door. 'Gyvel' is pronounced 'jyvel', not very unsimilar to 'jevel' = 'devil'. The Lockerbie bombing seems to have indexed this turnaround of the keys outside that house in Labraaten.

If my 'rathunt memory' from Odda (including the element of the broom) tells why 'Gori' is a sensible name for the problem with conflicting custody and genetic parenthood, it could be about Sachs.

Chiesa di Santa Spirito [SS] dei XII Apostoli contains the Tiepolo which embodies the mystery of poetry, the donation of divine meaning to humans, by the hand that reaches to the mouth. If this is 'Heinrich Himmler' (coindexed with San Pantalon), it makes sense that his SS was a part of the war against poetry and poetic logic.

Devold, devil, Tiepolo, diaspora.

Ragna Gröver seems to be the unofficial figurehead of the state of Israel. It is only one week's gap in the temporal structure around Kristallnacht to her birthday. One week, en uke, a nuke, the keys.

Has England put a secret clause into the 'Staatsvertrag' with Israel which lends them control with decisive moments - VETO or ethical imperatives or something like that?

Whether by coincidence or whatever, the 'bollette' (bills for el, gas etc) ran to a telling sum recently. It must have been roughly right so I suppose it could in fact be a coincidence. That was after a period of delayed sending of 'bollette' (not 'Collette') to people everywhere in the district, could be it was in Italy in general. I notice that the source under Oslo Report #3 which also seems to index 'Gudmund Harlem' is "Bell Syst. Tech. J. Jan 39, p.222" which in fact also can be a background for 'Rekustad, dr.Verboten' (by some dr.John Jensen or similar, Georgia, Chechen etc). If the flooding in the old house at Rekustad where I lived in 1977-78 also is described in the undertext of the Eisenhower doctrine #3, cp. also 'vintertöyet', then there could be reasons to believe that the kitchen tap could have been opened by somebody while I was away. I notice the 'prefrontal cortex' theory of schizophrenia. Something about the 'exchequer'? Sounds BRitish... "But this is madness!" I suppose one cannot believe that british administration has made a secret agreement with Israel in 1948 (V-2, Ve-um etc) which lends to them the chance by Eidsvig-Eichmann Hiroshima-Nagasaki nuke to make decisions a la bombing Gaza after tapping of my computer has given rise to the idea of Moses leading the people through the desert (in apostoli times, though, or even before) or not letting the embassy answer a letter from me (while others, instead of an answer from the embassy, would try to get the antenna into the flat by drilling a hole in the wall). If there is such a reality-based albeit unconstitutional 'secret clause' on Israel's relation to England, resembling the strange clause in the austrian Staatsvertrag which seems to allow for a british liquidation of austrians whenever the 'allied forces' feel that it gets 'too nazi' there (for example when I go to register my new address in Vienna), it would be equally much a case of "But this is madness!". And that madness could even be under the control of a theory of schizophrenia generated by a deficient prefrontal cortex. Was somebody peeping in the prefrontal 'Windows' there at Rekustad in early 1978?

In short, is somebody tapping my computer - such as in november-december 2008?

In short, does there exist a secret clause which lets England control decisions in Israel which has to do with my historic person? Then I think the international community should stop England on that point. It is likely that the british aspirations for global power - the World Government of the global community in the sense of 'the people of Israel' - includes the role of me as Satan. Then one should blame England for the bombing of Lebanon 2006 and of Gaza now in 2008-2009. There should be a complete dishwashing of such 'secret clauses' on top state level. The mixmax of Himmler's satanic policy with innocent poetic logic cannot take it anywhere.

Gröver/'Mengele' once took me for a car drive up to the psychiatric hospital 'Ve-um' outside Fredrikstad (a place somewhat burdered down with rumour, such as ideas about people who are 'sikret' inside the enclosure - cp. also the big alsatian dog of Tone Gröver's friend 'Sölvi'), for some errand he had there. As we drove into the area outside the entrance door, it was apparently a patient from the hospital who was standing outside, conducting the traffic. He waved and signalled that we should drive into the parking lot to the right, and when Gröver/'Mengele' drove to the left instead he waved and signalled that we should drive to the left. "He is conducting the traffic", said Gröver/'Mengele', turning the wheel in his VW.

Clearly if England can just shoot an austrian if they feel that he seems 'too nazi', then it could be easy to understand why ÖVW have not yet returned the Finanzierungsbeitrag to me - if that be the wish of british administration. The austrian president was 'returned' to heaven when I moved into Vienna, as if he were a 'fy-nazi-runk-spy-drag'.

This could be about the status of me in the zwischenpapier role of british mythos theatre if the aim is to define me as a sort of british 'satan'. The story is 'kau-devil-sk' and 'devil-Skau' like 'Mykle' and 'Nykler'. The revelation photo from Vilnius tells about the boy in the dentist C-HAIR ('see here/hair') and the mask tells of the MASS-EGG (a lot of eggs) that were removed in 1953. Cp. X-mas 1957. 'Maas-egg' = 'gulls egg'. Johan Borgen had a literary character called 'Mumle Gaasegg', cp. 'gumle maasegg' = 'to munche gulls eggs'. 'In the revelation' would be the return out of Vienna. The dentist was removing material from my bony (cp. the alsatian) teeth like the doctor who could have removed eggs from Sachs' ovaries. That could be the Rwanda genocide on the Tutsies.

Turning the keys in the housedoor to Labraaten 58 could be to turn the keys in a structure based on the talmudic tractate of the Erubin. The 'broom' would be that 'hold-a-cost' which could be recognized in the cheap linguistic trick of 'the ultimate organizer of the holocaust on the genetic stock of Jews'. When my work is in parallel with some folios of the Erubin, that could of course be precisely because these pages have been abused by administration. But my logic is not administrative - it is poetic, like that hebrew text once was and still should be taken to be.

The conclusion could be that if this is a matter of the Finanzierungsbeitrag, then it is really a matter of the third millenium and possible genocidal plans for a verboten program in Europe.

GAS-PAS-GAS could be the two cases of narcosis of mine - in the summer 1975 and summer 1982 - with a PAS in the mid point. I notice that Leif & Lilly (not 'knife and Nelly') moved out from the flat under me in Voldgaten 1 in probably late or at least probably second half of 1978, and Kari Löveid with daughter moved in. I think it happened once - could it have been in late 1978? - that a person PASsed me in the atrium which perhaps could be related to the phenomenon of me having been living in Vienna but no longer living there, even if the Finanizierungsbeitrag is not returned, hence = 'was Vienna'. (This passing in the atrium could even have been contained in the newspiece on Clinton's bypass heart operation not long after I had moved to Vienna). The housing company is called ÖVW: In Volda there was a neighbour doctor called 'Styr' = the steering 'wheel' of a car. I notice also the US 'dissident' party of 'Nader'. There is a certain 'transcendent' flavour in the expression 'have been living but no longer being there'.

I tried to find out via internet whether lasers can be used for surgery through the skull without opening it. The web could not give me an answer. I thought that I had got it when I came across the expression 'laser surgery through the intact skull' - ah! here it is! - and then it turned out to be about laser surgery through a small hole drilled in the 'intact skull'. It was like this everywhere - impossible to get an answer which thereby would settle the issue of THE POWER. One article came alarmingly close - it spoke about 'red ruby' lasers developed in the sixties, but they nearly blew the whole brains out so they could not be used. In the mid seventies, it said, more handy tools became widespread in hospitals everywhere. Probably the 'hair-dryer'. I had to give up after two and a half hour surfing for an explicit wording something like "laser beams can be used for brain surgery through the solid bone". Science is like that today. One can perhaps get a brief glimpse of the truth if one has passed through years of 'jargon gasing' in academic institutions, but otherwise not. I also tried to find out if Sachs' eggs could have been fertile in 1953 - but I could not find any information on it. All the web pages seem to have been made by one and the same donor (could it be Adolf Hitler? - we must hope it is not like that in the sperm banks of the global 'dritte Reich' as well) - they are all pyjama blue with smiling women and babies and doctor voices: They tell that ovaries contain hundreds of thousands of eggs at birth but these have reduced dramatically at puberty and at the time of the menopause there are hardly any left. And those who should be left are likely to be murdered by SMOKERS. There is no other danger left for ovarian eggs today than smoking, tell the pyjamas, as if the WHO campaign against 'Fumiani' should be in these pages as well. Egg death in the ovaries is a very serious problem of today, they tell. (Is it really true that when an egg goes for the tube, there is a couple of dozens following it?) But there is no information on what happens with eggs throughout life if there should be no menstruation cycle going at all, such as could have been the case with Sachs if she were mutilated just before the investigations in the Dreyfus case began. Through the propaganda one glimpses the idea that although fertility rate declines blabla in the forties, or really since birth, if not even before, there are women who have given birth to children in their sixties. It is fully possible that the quasi-medical files on the internet try to create the impression that eggs are fertile only for women younger than Sachs was in 1953 - and therefore the 'egg clinic' should be safe and (not?) 'anti-semitic'. My guess is that if there has been no menstruation throughout life, the ovaries will not have been influenced by normal chemical/hormonic processes and the number of fertile eggs could even be higher than normal. If this would have been mentioned in Sachs' medical file, it would after her death have been in the custody of Margareta Holmqvist. I notice also the 'marry-lin' of 'mo-n-ro[e]'. 'Norman Deep Acher' could of course mean 'kore filling' if Sachs had a boyfriend in her youth whose alleged witness report could have been the basis for an intrigue.

The Aukrusts moved to Thorleif Gravs vei after Österaas. It was in London 1997 that I wrote a continuation to my two poems 'The river' (over the feature 'consonantal/vocalic', I think it was) and 'The church' (over the feature 'vocalic/diffuse') - in the form of a cycle over the feature 'grave'. There were I think 6 poems of ballade type, old sentimental style, one of them is in the book "Time and the sonnet". But the other ones seem to have become victims of virus or similar things on my computer and it seems that all material to them have been lost. I cannot find any part on my computer or among my papers - there were some pages. To this can be added that one of the 5-6 illustrations to the Oslo Report is a drawing of a rocket or torpedo with a 'hatched' = 'skravert' field in the front. 'S-GRAV-ert'. ddd When the israeli embassy in Berlin did not answer my letter, in spite of the potentially extreme urgency in the importance of the matter, and when somebody else wanted to get an antenna in by drilling a hole in the wall, I had to take it as the possible answer from the embassy and since I could not prevent the installation of the antenna, I moved out of the short-term flat which I had been living in for more than half a year. I was planning to settle in Berlin (in spite of some Berliner Linien problems). This was the beginning of the end of my stay in Berlin and I was finally squeezed out and down to Vienna where I also was squeezed out. I went to Athens and when I gave my new book to the library in the jewish museum and they promised to send me a letter of receipt or thanks, and it did not arrive, I had to take the 'letter' on the lift-wall, which seemed to be an announcement of 'drilling holes' for 'antenna into the flat' if I were not out of the house within June, I had to move out. This was not the least because of the role of the US film 'American Beauty' in Vienna. It is in this series of NO ANSWER that there arises the danger of mixmax of 'mental contents' - as if my breakthrough in november 2008 infused the inspiration in the israeli government of acting quickly while there was a historic wave to surf on. "Ah, but he did not have to move out! There was no such meanings in the communication on the lift-wall". "Ah but this Mengele story is told and settled long ago and we did not need more information about it!" Well that is what they know - they know their own 'mental contents' - and if they assume that this is the same as the 'mental contents' of mine, then the mixmax can happen to be a historic fact. I cannot read the minds of the administrators. How can I know that it was unthinkable that the embassy would answer with a hole in the flat in Berlin? I did believe in 2004, like most people probably do, that that was unthinkable and that my letter quickly would prompt a telephone to Wiesenthal who would grab his looking-glass and put on hat and coat and take up the hunt for the nazi. But as time went by and the only answer was that sort of thing, including what appeared to be a rather massive squeeze-out campaign ('nobody loves you when you're down and out', sth like that - I had been squeezed out and therefore I was squeezed out), I had to revise my ideas about Israel and I still cannot tell myself that it was impossible that they had answered by way of that antenna. Which means that the story cannot find an explanation without a version which tells that Israel is under the potential control of England and Mengele and all those and that is the only explanation which can contain all the elements. It is over and over again the same conclusion because there is no answer. Administration is steering into a state of autism. It is the world's biggest error to believe that administration shall not speak when there is no administrative reason for it. If this has caused the need for Israel to 'prove' that they are not nazis and that they are not deceiving the diaspora, it would probably be better to prove this by way of a letter from the embassy to me rather than bombing and terrorizing the neighbours - in the worst case it could be about a bombing which has indexed my intellectual progress on my possibly tapped computer in which case it would be about a way of converting it into the authorship of Satan against which Israel will protect the diaspora. If that is the story. I don't know why they attacked the palestinians in Gaza. That is why I should get my Finanzierungsbeitrag zurück. It could have been the democratic victory in the presidential election which prompted the rathunt in Gaza. There has been calm and peace during Bush - but could be the israeli government expected a new turn of terror with the democrats. Gröver/'Mengele' once told me that there was a village fool in Klipra who had a clock and who always said when they asked him what time it was: "Ti paa to", which probably means Tiepolo. I think it was the same man who said: - Have you seen the new fire engine ('brannbilen')? - No. - You wanna see it? - Well why not. And then he would press the fire alarm button. This could be a story about Tiepolo's Flora painting with the 'fire engine' = 'brann-bilen' = 'Gordon Brown'. This makes it also all the more likely that the 'Manna' painting is taken to show Even Dalbakk between me and the girl on the stairs at his nachspiel = 'a Dalbakk között'. 'a Dalbakk kisset' would mean 'kissed by Dalbakk', which could mean that Dalbakk is me. I think Dalbakk stepped up the stairs between us sitting there. Cp. 'Darlen Bakke' etc. There is the name of the friend in youth of Nelly Sachs called Dora Jablonski married Horwitz. This could be the origin of the nazi camp 'Dora' where Hans Karl Möser was chief. I have associated this Dora signification with Marmorveien 7 and Tveteraas. Dora-Baj-lonski = Dalbakk lonski ('között', a sort of 'hor-witz'). Cp. 'Dora Templatski' = 'dor-meta-platski' = 'dolmetscher platski'. A WHO dolmetsch? Celan worked as a UN translator in Geneva for a while. Dolmetsch on jetski etc. A Dal-bakk is a 'valley-bakk', and I think I noticed some stories from the french presidential election about 'rally-back' etc. 'Kniple-veien', 'knipler-eien' ('ovary'). I don't know if the phenomenon of near monozygotic twins of Ragna Gröver and her ten year younger sister Marit Nedregaard could have been produced by way of neighbouring eggs from an ovary - if two adjacent eggs are more likely to make similars than two distant ones. It is the Tiepolo painting of the 'Manna' with the detail of the boy stepping up and with a 'Dalbakk'-looking type looking at him which could be a reason for recognizing this complex. It could then mean Gordon Brown, due to 'brown-bilen' = the 'Flora' painting. Dalbakk's wife is/was called 'Mia' which is greek for '1'. 'Gresk en' = 'gresken' = 'the greek language'. I once got a greek grammar and introduction booklet by Gröver/'Mengele'. He said he had planned to read it himself but had given up since he was too old. Greek for 'vann' = 'hydor'. There was a front page of Time or Newsweek (= 'Devold Eidsvig') as I passed a newsstand, showing a photo of Obama with unexperienced look. There is no reason to take such phenomena as telling of a critical attitude to Obama if 'knekk-Eham-mock-o-nomisk' = 'knekke ham ökonomisk' = 'break him economically' is the theme. 'Knekk' = '[hard] candy' / break. 'Eham' = the Ehamgasse in Vienna. My monthly income in 2008 was 16... NOK per month and the monthly rent for the flat in Ehamgasse was 338,93 euro. The currency rate should have been around 8 NOK = 1 euro which would have made some 2000 euros per month of my pension, but the new value makes reduces it with some 3-400 euros. If I had chosen the flat at Linke Wienzeile ('Schönbrunnerstrasse'), the rent would have been 375 euros and it may be that this is a sort of 'virtual' rent value. There was also a flat in Linzerstrasse - I got the option of choice between these on US presidential day 4 December 2004 and let Vienna choose for me - they gave me this Ehamgasse first. When I have moved out and not got the Finanzierungsbeitrag zurück, there is a 'virtual presence' of me there which could activate this drop in currency value which means that I factually also pay houserent there if the drop in value would not have taken place if I had not moved out. But I think I had no choice. What could 'o-nomisk' mean? 'Of the name'. If Clinton meant terror and if Bush was the formal 'bush-day' principle which split a possible rape of Hitler in Oslo from possible Mengele chemicals in Hammerfest, it could mean a 'formal monkey business' in the sense of a formal principle of relief for me by the attenuation of the joint effect of these two. Hence I should be glad that somebody takes that place instead of me, etc. That could mean 'terror-and-monkey-business' as a national program around the turn of the millenium. If Obama is representing 'jump-yar-negro-over', he could also represent 'Ronk Jarnegg Röver' as the placename phenomenon Hammerfest-Odda-Molde-Volda-Molde, the tour of the hospital career of Gröver/'Mengele' apparently under the control of Gudmund Harlem. It could mean 'o-nomisk'. But that means that the morph MOCK or MÖCK could be the theme. It was a Möck recorder which Hans Frode Nedregaard (son of Marit Nedregaard) played on. He seems to be the Jesus child in the 'adoration of the magi' by Tiepolo, including the british responsibility claim in Arvid Storsveen. Hitler was also a 'mock president' - he mocked the people of Israel under their leader Moses in the desert and things like that. Which means that a 'mock president' in USA could be in 'imitation' of Moses, persecuted by the nazis. It is not likely that Time and Newsweek have launched campaigns against the new president. Tiepolo = diavolo, Devold, diaspora. Which could mean that the overall project could be to leave the stamp of 'Satan' on the jewish-genetic diaspora. But that is when Obama could be representing a 'mock president', which could be the explanation to the front page photo on Time or Newsweek or whatever it was. It is not likely to be a very visible strategy. There is also the lithuanian concept of 'moksleiva' = school, student. Maybe I should add that it was Tordis Schaerven Söderlind who used the word 'understellbehandling' when we passed 'Kaaten' in car. I don't remember if the car was brown. 'Söderlind' could mean 'Rechlin' from Oslo Report 6 for example if Tordesillas is the theme. Dora Jablonski Horwitz had a sister named Hilde Jablonski married Bental. If british administration takes my book as a representative of 'the beloved child of the Ausdehnungslehre' due to its grassmannian approach, there could perhaps be traces of 'candy' themes. This could be an all the more acute question if it be based on secret surveillance of my computer - for the work I am into now, which relates to just that book I had sent to british legal deposit. Ti po to: - Harru setten nye brambilen du? prince Harry - Nei - Virru sean? prince William - Vel hvorfor ikke... Aa saa trykkan paa brannalarmen... This BRAMBILEN = Gordon Brown = Tiepolo's Flora