The Kennedy phenomenon

John Bjarne Grover

The historic background of the concept of the andorran enclave seems to be in the construction of the John F. Kennedy via Adolf Hitler's preparatory work. According to my theory, which is based not the least on the idea that the attempt on Lenin was for telling this, Adolf Hitler had in august 1918 been replaced with a briton (or american) called Paul Marshall who travelled to Berlin and started his political career there, and eventually made a government 1933-45 which was composed of british and/or american agents. Notably, the real name of Hermann Göring could have been Kennedy - as the basis for the postwar phenomenon.

Hitler' work was the mock of the 'jewish revolution', notably his attack on the mystic archetypes, the man-on-wagon being prominent. The essential element in this archetype is the wagon slamming into the curbstone and thereafter lifting itself up - against all natural laws of gravity. It means mystically an element of grace. The big earthquake of San Francisco in 1906 took place in the night after Caruso sang in 'Carmen' - and it can be speculated if this earthquake was the result of much dynamite having been dug down in the ground under the city. The reason for this speculation is in the time point which conforms to the often-observed formula of 0-1-2-3-4... - all the first natural numbers being present in the time point minus one of them. If it were one of the first big artificial earthquakes, it would have been for just this reason: To start the 20th century 'intelligence' coup of the man-on-wagon by the essential element of the lifting up after the 'slamming into' = 'sang into' the 'carmen' = 'the edge of the curbstone'. Then the town was lifted up. This happened around the time when Modern Language Review was founded. See MLR april 1906.

It is this 'lifting up' which is the divine aspect - the divine helping the humans up - and which was a part of the strategy of Hitler for bringing him to power. It can be assumed that Hitler's job was to bring the archetypes into so much disgrace, pretending to be the strongest supporter of them and bringing so much disaster on mankind, that after the war nobody wanted more of these 'nazi' archetypes. From this, Kennedy would be presented as the new man-on-wagon in disguise - in such a form that people would not recognize him as the same as the man-on-wagon but nevertheless voting for just that principle in his appearance.

The basis could be found in the revelation of Catherine Laboure in Paris in 1830: It showed a big M curling around a crossbar with two hearts under it and a cross over it. Although I believe that I am the first to give an exact definition of the blue metre to an extent that can allow for dating of literary texts, the concept of 'thousand-year Reich' and the obvious suggestion of 1000 (years, for example) in the latin M of Laboure tells that the idea of a time period of 1000 years in combination with the 2 seconds of the 2 hearts is not new. This is what allows for a conceptualization of a conversion which makes sound travel faster than light. It is my own construction with 365 sonnets of 14 lines each which makes for this - and I therefore guess that the logic of the political construction is based on intuition only. However, assuming 365 sonnets with 14 lines each, if that extends over 1000 years and converts via the concept of 2 seconds per line in the red metre, it means that (in my red and blue metres) 2 seconds red metre equals 71 days blue metre, which means that light under such circumstances divide with a factor of 3 million and hence travels with a speed of 360 km per hour. That means that light, with this conversion between the two poetic metres, travels much slower than sound. There is in my conceptualization a mainly visual basis for the blue metre and an acoustic for the red (of 2 seconds), and the conversion is therefore basically that the visual is taken as the aural, which means (in my conceptualization) when the visions of archetypes are given a poetic form when converted into the acoustics of the red metre.

In this framework, sound is the fastest, light is slower, and matter is the slowest. If Kennedy masturbated on my newborn cortex in july 1957, it was his 'white matter' coming in from the right or left and it was supposed to be conceived by the newborn as a revelation of light coming from in front of the child: That makes for 90 nazi degrees and a recognition of the masturbator as divine: The man-on-wagon in Kennedy shape.

The man-on-wagon has glasses and a little beard. The glasses are the adjustment of the lighbeams bending in through the lenses of the eyes and the beard would probably be about the corresponding bending hairs in the cochlea.

Is there reason to believe that it was Kennedy who was there? One important reason is found in the name of the family of Indira Gandhi: Her own name meaning the finger 'nehru' inbetween the two hemispheres if nail scissoring (her husband's name) of some white matter (corpus callosum) was included, the names of her two sons Sanjay and pilot-educated Rajiv meaning the address and the flying sensation. The first address was in Sandveien 4, Molde, Norway in Scandinavia, and it is very possible that the murder of Aung San in 1947 was for installing this address 10 years in advance. This means that there is some basis for assuming that such an event would be about me and not just anybody born around that time. The historic moment should be in MLR, if that periodical encodes major historic events in advance in its undertext. The april 1957 issue seems to encode my name and the names of the custody parents in titles 1 and 2 and the two genetic parents Sachs and Celan in titles 3 and 4. Leonie Sachs in title 3 is not so easy to recognize - unless one includes the 'further notes' of titles 5-6-7 - which suggest a 'neily saks' scissoring or 'sawing' off the one letter after the other: Gottfried, Gotried and Otfried. Could be there are traces of this in my corpus callosum even today?

MLR April 1957

1. The application of textual theory to Hamlet's dying words. By Winifred M.T.Nowottny.
2. Ben Jonson's 'To Sir William Sidney, on his birthday'. By Lisle C.John
3. Further notes on Flaubert's realism. By Marjorie Shaw
4. Zola's 'Le Rêve' as an experimental novel. By J.H.Matthews
5. Numbers in Otfried's 'Evangelienbuch'. By Hilda Swinburne
6. 'Vicissitudes' in Gotfried's 'Tristan'. By H.B.Willson
7. The place of 'Martin Salander' in Gottfried Keller's evolution as a prose writer. By J.M.Ritchie

It can be argued that my first address in Sandveien 4 is contained in the first title.

The july issue should contain this situation with Kennedy. I have guessed that it be about a 1-2-3, which means this helmet lifting soon after birth, a rape around age 6 months and chemicals injected at age 18 months. The MLR gives reason for guessing that Kennedy could have been involved in all three cases - which means that he would have been jetted over the Atlantic in quick military fighter jet at least thrice - and there is this element of 'recursion' in the finger inbetween the hemispheres as a rape and the cutting of some white matter as a chemical injection. I here bring the first title of the three relevant issues of MLR for evaluating the relevance of this 1-2-3 theory as far as involvement of Kennedy personally is concerned:

MLR jul 1957: A Current Misconception concerning the Influence of Marino's Poetry on Crashaw's. By Laura Pettoello
= a Kennedy Fitzgerald-John concerning the influence of water's on-a-try on chrash-of. 'Laura på hotellet' ('Laura in the hotel') = the hairs are bending, the biers are hending.

MLR oct 1957: Well-Languaged Daniel: A Reconsideration. By Cecil C. Seronsy
= john fitzgerald kennedy: a reconsideration. By sessel c. sensory.

MLR jan 1959: "The Tragedie of Cleopatra" and the Date of "Antony and Cleopatra". By Arthur M. Z. Norman
= Arthur M. Z. Norman = (by rewrite of Tragedie to Antony) treasury snörmann = kennedy john f. This corresponds to the book 'Da vi snödde inne' which I got in 1964 probably after the 'John F.Kennely' earthquake of Prince William Sound.

There are some reasons to believe that Kennedy, according to this evidence, could have been personally involved in such a bad start of my life - if, of course, it had such a start.

Now the trick for relaunching the man-on-wagon in the form of Kennedy would have been to do it concealed in a new shape. The essence of this would have been in just the idea that light travels slower than sound and hence a technology for information transfer faster than light should be possible - you just use the acoustic reality for that. Light bends through the lens of the eye and the hairs are bending in the cochlea of the inner ear: A soundwave is perceived through the bending of these sensory hairs in the inner ear when waves are flushing through the fluid in the cochlea. It means that the essential moment is when the hairs are bending. This spoons into 'the biers are hending' which seems to have been in the thereby essential Kennedy assassination on the spooned form 'the biers are hending', that is, when the hands bow down and grasp around the handles of the bier to lift the body up and take it to the grave. But there was a Kennedy on the bier board and hence 'the biers are kennedyan'. It means that the hending of the bier was a Kennedying of the bier. Although this could suggest that it be about mafia power, the political trick is to claim that it was not mafia, it was 'clean' political power and thereby one can leap to the paradoxical trick that it was John F. Kennedy himself, the dead man on the bier, who lifted the bier up.

This is the man-on-wagon, the very God himself, the contradiction of the most fundamental laws of gravity in the universe. Could it be that necrophilia is the concept?

This is apparently the reason for the continued emphasis of the Kennedy presidency as The Administration: There never was a cleaner president etc - it means that this was clean power and not mafia. Had it been mafia = family power, the hands lifting the bier would have been not his own but the family hands, and that is not so very impressive.

It is probably a matter of 'intelligence' mafia power. It is fully possible that Hitler was an integral part of the construction - and everybody believed that they had to say goodbye to all the good old archetypes after the war - but there it returned on a cloud with power and great glory in the form of John F.Kennedy - the very saviour of mankind, the Messiah we had all waited for. It could be scrabble and word games all of it. A dirty trick for couping mankind's self-understanding and making that dependent on a ruler in control of that self-understanding - and thereby a way of blocking for the development of a new information technology that otherwise could have put us in contact with remote intelligences who could have threatened the global power of angloamerican administration.

This is likely to be the reason why it was a Kennedy who was present at the 1-2-3's if that is the story of my early childhood. I notice that Ibsen wrote not only 'The Wild Duck' in the 1890's but also 'Eyolf Little' and 'John Gabriel Borkmann'.

Rape at age 6 months corresponds to the finger between the hemispheres and the chemicals at age 18 months to the cutting of the white matter. Hence the 1-2-3 is supposed to look 'recursive' and 'computerish'. If I am assigned the role of the Adolf Eichmann - the family tree man whose genetics was first put into generation by the arrest of Eichmann and the announcement of it to Knesset followed immediately by the world's biggest earthquake between Concepcion and Temuco (would the latter of these mean the shaping effect of calendarial telescopes?), followed by the birth of a younger sister 9 months and one day after the quake - and if I should have some genetic daughters, for example exposed on the cultural stage, they would likely be named after these 'recursive effects' - the helmet-lifting with intruding finger, the call of the opening, the chemical correlate to the white matter - for the services to recognize the relation as being the same as the child abuse of Kennedy. Which would be for couping the genetics - and the esthetic logic.

As far as concerns the theory that I should be in the role of an 'eichmann' of Concepcion 1960, it seems that it would require the relevance of a theory on the calendarial telescopes represented in the name of 'Temuco' = 'team of co': The theory says that if e.g. two very low parents, say, 155 cm tall both of them, conceive a child in the moment which is at the tip of a calendarial telescope with 'joints' in moments when very tall persons, say, more than 200 cm height all of them, have been conceived formerly, the child from the 155 tall ones can be as tall as one wants - 200 cm, the first in the family beyond body height of 160 cm. To this it must be added that 1) it is hard to find such perfect telescopes over time points of conception, although one probably has constructed such telescopes for at least a century if not more, and 2) there could be many people in the world that could have been conceived in that very moment (and are all of them that high? - it could be difficult to find out of since one rarely knows the exact time point of conception) and therefore it may be that additional factors of the parents could be needed to constrain the effect. I know nothing of this theory which I have fancied myself, and I can fancy it on to the further level telling that if the precision in the telescopes is very high, say, seconds or milliseconds for the moment of conception for every joint in the telescope, the effect can be even stronger than genetics - say, two whites get a negro child if conditions constrain sufficiently for it. I dont know if this is right, but would believe that at least talents could distribute in this way - which is a variant of 'cosmic harmony' - with units of revolution of astronomic bodies - the moon, the earth, the sun etc. If so, then it would mean that genetics is only a special variant of the phenomenon - which thereby is about to come under administrative control anyhow. If there is a basis for assuming the relevance of this phenomenon, it should be published and not be reserved for political intrigue.

The construction of the political intrigue means that Kennedy is conceived of as the man-on-wagon, probably the most fundamental archetype, with divine connotations, if not even the God himself, ruling the cosmic harmonies. That means that Kennedy is the mafia chief par excellence: It would have been a real crook if he was involved in this role as child abuser, and does not say no thanks to a status as God. The lightbeam from aside is quicker than the white matter which it is. People vote for him because they feel that the vulgurization and secularization of the modern society has gone too far. What a misunderstanding!

It could be about the hallmark of western democracy: People vote for the opposite of what they want and the administrative power is based on child abuse protected by the political intrigue.

It adds to the story that chomskyan grammar is supposed to carry the logical burden. It seems that Chomsky's grammar types are only modern versions of the archetypes. The four grammar types in the Chomsky language hierarchy can be defined as follows:

The socalled type 0 grammar is an unrestricted grammar which works on strings by replacing any string with any other string. When it has done this for a while, the string has been changed, and it is this derivational change which is the contents of the computation (the resulting string and the derivational history). The strings consist both of terminals (house, eat,...) and non-terminals (NOUN, VERB,...). The unrestricted grammar is equivalent to a Turing-machine.

The type 1 grammar is a context-sensitive grammar. This grammar replaces any single non-terminal category A in the context of the strings b and c in the form b-A-c with any string a, resulting in the form b-a-c. The difference from the unrestricted grammar is that the CSG replaces single categories with strings, while the former replaces anything with anything. Chomsky defined the CSG in its socalled non-contracting form, which requires that the string does not 'shrink' in the course of the derivation.

The type 2 grammar is the context-free grammar. This replaces any single non-terminal category A with any string. The replacement is not hampered by considerations of context, which means, as it goes, that there is a smaller range of specifically restricted infinite languages which can be outputted from it than can be done with the context-sensitive grammar.

The type 3 grammar is the regular grammar, which replaces any non-terminal category with any string, provided that the string contains at most one non-terminal, and that this is at the very end of the string.

Hence type 0 is my fourth archetype (the man with spectacles and and the small boy or man with zigzag legs). Type 1 is the nose-trunk, type 2 the man-on-wagon, and type 3 is dogs paradox. It is only the context-free phrase structure recursion which is the real novelty of chomskyan formal grammars - since this puts it beyond the level of the pushdown grammar which all finite computers really are. It is said that this is what makes humans different from the computers - that they understand the infinite creativity in the rule.

The non-terminal (grammatical category) vs terminal element (the text or speech itself) is about the role of the curbstone. One notices the 'non-contracting form' of the (vagina-related) nose of the nose-trunk archetype - the female body who is capable of holding the man-on-wagon inside her chest and thereby the category is recognized as a text or speech string.

The concept of RECURSIVE applies to this phenomenon - and that is precisely what is or was supposed to make chomskyan grammar more than a structuralist grammar when the innate rule inventory is included - that it can call itself recursively as a RULE the epistemological status of which is elevated (like a kennedyan bier?) to some quasi-divine level. For a human reality, there is no such things as infinitely long sentences, even four or five times nesting makes it too complex, and to claim that the RULE has a mystic value which makes this truly infinitely recursive is to be a believer. Could be it is the american Kennedy you are invited to believe in.

90 degrees angle (the WINCKEL) probably comes from this recursion: When the string contains a visual archetype in aural format and thereby converts red and blue metre, it goes into a nesting loop which can be straigtened out to a 90 degrees angle, a branching node in the grammar. It is probably in the view of an angloamerican culture that austrian culture looks WINCKEL. Which means that when 1) the once poetic depth and religious understanding in austrian culture are converted into angloamerican symbolic logic with 90 degrees angles, and 2) Kennedy is launched as the new man-on-wagon quasi-divine archetype rising from the ashes of Hitler's 'jewish revolution', a factual swap of roles or identities between angloamerican and austrian culture is intended to take place: Austria turns angloamerican and vice versa. This is probably planned to be the essence of the assumed 'Jar connection' via a microstate called 'Anustria' - with its borders potentially at the 'innere Hofburgtor' resembling the helmet of a newborn child - making England and USA 'andorran enclaves' in that swap sense of it.

I can tell an example of what looks like this 'kennedy' system: The bombings of Russia 1999 seems to encode 'Kennedy' in this sense of the microstate Anustria.

31 August 1999: Manezh Square shopping centre near the Kremlin. A note was found allegedly from "Union of Revolutionary Writers" who seemed (but not really, according to their leader who said they were not involved) to claim responsibility, with the message (according to CNN): "A dead consumer's unfinished hamburger is a revolutionary hamburger. Consumers: We don't like your way of life and it's unsafe for you". Not so long after I had moved into the current address, which is not so far from the Literaturhaus in Vienna, I think it was in the summer 2010 that there was a note on the wall of the entrance room with what looked like threats. I took photos of them to the police. There was also the shooting spree by Harman in Bratislava near the border. As far as 'burger' is concerned, there is also the concept of 'Bürgersteig'.

4 September: Buinaksk in Dagestan. I have wondered if there could be secret surveillance of the flat I live in. There has been a phenomenon of what appears to be a stalker and there seems possibly to be coordination of his movements with e.g. the US stockmarket.

9 September: Guryanova Street no.19. 'Guryanova ulitsa djevjatnatsat'. See article on 'Bürgersteig'.

13 September: The house at the intersection Kashinskoye Shosse (no.6) and Varshavskoye Shosse. There were some 5-6 shots to be heard apparently from the garage in probably early 2012. I have wondered if it could have been about 'shin-skoye-shots' in the sense of loudspeakers reproducing e.g. the sound of the shots that hit Indira Gandhi in 1984 - the sound travelling abnormally slow and reaching Vienna from Dehli only many years later - although there was perhaps a little too much 'trökk' (punch) in them for that. Would that have been the 'truck' bombs? With the 'man-on-wagon' being the source of that 'trökk'? In which case one could perhaps spot the name of 'Kennedy' behind it. 'Cat-fur' could also be 'bending'.

16 September: A truck bomb in Volgodonsk, outside a block of flats. Volga-don-sk = man on wagon? Vol-God-on-sk[y] = Messiah on a cloud?

The plan could be the more or less fictive microstate 'Anustria' as a power-ring muscle around Vienna for an angloamerican control with the world. The shooting spree of Harman in Bratislava could have been about this. The 'Bürgersteig' could mean a global class division and if there is US terror bombing going on in Iraq, it could be for this 'tele'-control. People are perhaps supposed to take faith in the Kennedy like they once believed in God.





© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 16 december 2013