Neutrinos, Heimskringla and poetic logic

Neutrinos, Heimskringla and poetic logic

John Bjarne Grover

My ('POLAKK English Bloggi' = PEB) can serve as a proof that there exists at least two forms of time - historic and poetic time - and hence that information transmission can go through any of these. It suggests that a poetic logic can be established for understanding the mechanisms of poetic time, like classic logic for (the physics of) historic time. It can serve to explain e.g. the phenomenon of neutrinos apparently travelling faster than light (if the data or analysis of them are not a joke for the media) - with my PEB, it can be explained that the redundancy in the data go via poetic time as a quasi-eternity shortcut through historic time. Neutrino overlight speed need therefore not refute Einstein - it could be that it only proves the relevance of my PEB which also can be used for dating texts.

Which means that my PEB can constitute a major step forwards, not only in poetry but also in physics, metaphysics etc. It should be made available to readers. CERN has not yet answered my letter to them - or if they have the answer has not reached me.

The power of the western forces (johnbjarnegrover.com/abc.htm is a book-length file on these topics), in particular the anglo-american global dominance via the norwegian prism including the Vietnam war, Iraq 1968-2003, and a probably planned future war in Italy, is based on the function of 'Heimskringla' johnbjarnegrover.com/pope.htm) with its inherent antisemitism and the essential fact that it has not so far been possible to prove conclusively that this was a (probably british) fabrication of the 17th-18th century. My PEB is groundbreaking news in this sense of it - that it makes it possible to date a text with much precision - and therefore it is for the first time possible to prove that Heimskringla is not authentically from the 13th century. That takes the bottom out of the power of the western forces (accumulated through the two world wars etc) - and hence it is natural to expect that the same western forces - however futile it could be - will try and find alternative solutions in order to rescue the antisemitic basis for their global dominance.

The Greenland crisis of 1931-33 (Mosquito Bay) is an example of how this principle of 'Heimskringla' was launched in the international attention as a prelude to Hitler in Germany - as a western responsibility claim on his antisemitism, could be even as a means for getting Hitler through to government. It was Harald Ophus Devold - a cousin or brother or something like that of my official grandmother Laura Devold whose name seems associated with the death of Lenin in 1924 in the evening before the world's first Labour government in London - who planted the norwegian flag in 'Myggbukta' ('migpotta' = 'the urine-pot') which means 'Mosquito Bay' = 'må skite oppi' = 'must shit into it', for the principle of 'bilingualism' ('Hare Lepus') in Heimskringla based on such orifice-orientated phonological-semantic matches shared in norwegian and hebrew language.

It is likely that it was Heimskringla which was the reason why Norway could be established in 1814 after Napoleon and therefore the first constitution was explicitly antisemitic and allowed no jews in the kingdom with the glorious past.

The cold war was probably all about this - whether Russia could take Norway or not and thereby bring the antisemitic power of the western forces to an end. Which means that NATO had the function of preserving the integrity of Heimskringla by preserving Norway, which means that NATO can be seen as a political tool established for threatening Norway to continue their accept of this (ridiculous) version of their glorious past. Norway was, as such, squeezed between east and west and the choice of antisemitism or not. Terror in the east (such as the Moscow theatre or Beslan school sieges) is therefore often likely to be designed as a norwegian ('nord-vestland' = Klipra, Mosquito Bay, Jan Mayen etc) insult of the east in order to make the prospects of a russian invasion unappealing in Norway, and Norway is, in order to preserve their independence, forced to accept the antisemitic basis for the power of the western forces.

In light of this, it is not likely that my norwegian citizenship is a guarantee for the preservation of and recognition of my rights to the work I have done to reach these results. It was 11 years of systematic and very lonely work (partly on the run from authoritative state power) on 'the form of time' in 'The Endmorgan Quartet' = TEQ before I could conclude the PEB in 2010 after 16 years on the project. When my PhD dissertation in linguistics was rejected in 1998, it was possibly for the planned continuation of the role of the doctorate in the western intrigue against Lenin and Hitler's couping of his revolution, and it could have been (on basis of pressure from NATO or not) for a planned rejection of my work generally, on the pretext of me suffering from various deficits which perhaps can be traced to abuse programs. When my school dentist in 1970-71 (age 13) installed tramlines of heavy metal running through all my white and healthy teeth (this is abuse which I know something about), that could have been for the idea that 'now the tramlines of your white matter should be in order', as if the white matter had been scissored up for a split-brain function in early life or thereabout (or lasered up at a later stage). I don't know if I am a partial or even complete split-brain (could be NATO controls all available digital X-rays today), but I have written my poetic work of the years 1994-2010 and later. It is of course fully possible (I have not much reason to believe so, though) that some or many of my school teachers could have been agents for a later possible conclusion on my performance that 'he could not even read and write', in spite of good official study results, and hence I could not, according to such a schedule, have written my poetry. Which of course is nonsense. I have also made some speculations on former schoolmates as relevant for the roles of e.g. the Clintons. It is of course possible that Norway has not much choice if they want to preserve their independence. Hopefully, the plan is not to coup my personal poetic revolution like Lenin's was couped by Hitler.

This is also a part of my personal background for the need for solving the riddle of Heimskringla. The semiotic principles of my PEB can probably, when properly understood (cp. also Blankenburg's novel-theoretic 'Ründung' like a steel cylinder in the deep structure of the text), be compared for interesting parallelisms with the philosophy and design of the wanckelmotored 'rockpedos', possibly jargoned 'knorrs', the underearth bombs which (hypothetically, this) can be driven long distances through rock for creating artificial earthquakes that serve to lend divine status to the administration who sent them. Which would tell of the grandiose mistakes the western powers have made in the development of the western culture when they invested the future in the upper hand of surface-based symbolic logic and reserved the lower for the Sunnmörian dialect (known to sound like cows) of Ivar Aasen, paralleled in the Sumerian of Rawlinson - for a counterpoint to the 'bilingual' stories of Heimskringla.

It is likely that the possibility of a safe dating of texts on a semiotic basis was not considered possible before my PEB was concluded in 2010.

In short, to go for a continued Heimskringla-based power of the western forces is not the future, and intellectuals, to the extent that they still exist, should try and understand this important point.

Of course, if overlight neutrino speed can be explained rationally by way of a poetic logic which also brings the power of Heimskringla to an end, then there is no future in clinging to this old antisemitism for preserving an upper hand of the western forces. Even NATO will quickly have to realize that a new and possibly overlight-speed physics is more important than old superstitions and brute racism.

Having said this, it must be added that Norway cannot both 1) claim to be independent and sovereign, and 2) wash their hands and say that they have no choice in these matters. Of course they do have a free choice, however much they use me as scapegoat on the background of the Octogon in claiming that I had a free choice, as free as theirs. Such scapegoating cannot solve their problem, in particular not now when evidence for the lacking authenticity of Heimskringla can be produced from my PEB.

I add the observation that the Oslo terror in 2011 in theory - I suppose they have theories in Norway what it was - I do not claim to know what it was about - could have been about these matters since the name of the terrorist arguably was similar to an interpretation of 'NATO' and this happened not so long after it had been discovered what my PEB really meant. Briefly, the PEB could probably even mean that NATO - at least from the viewpoint of these interests - will come to be dissolved along with the whole west-east tension balanced on it. The Oslo terror could therefore be a sign that Norway was at war with NATO and won the war: Then they are entitled to pack down their Heimskringle and the story is over and they can turn independent and free and need no longer feel under the heel of such tacit NATO obligations. Hopefully it should suffice for a breakthrough in this important barrier - if it meant that NATO no longer needs Norway from this point of view and gladly can let the country be annexed by Russia, then the Oslo terror could even mean that NATO has already fulfilled their obligations by sending troop(s) for a participation in the war. An era is over. A new time is dawning. It does not mean that my book must not be published under any circumstances - rather it means that as soon as one has seen this 1000-year cyclicity then it is only ridiculous to continue the old game. It is over in a second or two. But why is my book still not published? (I hope they don't sit there with pirate copies in the philological labs). Don't they see the point - that after it was discovered what my PEB entails then there is no sense at all in continueing the old Heimskringle nonsense?

But should I have to say this?

Maybe somebody could help me find a publisher who could print copies and distribute them (it can be on a simple basis with a contract which can be terminated by both parts at any time) - I think it is important that institutes, scholars, poets etc get the chance to buy a copy. There is an enormous lot of work which can be made within the fields of e.g. ancient text restoration, text dating, semiotic and literary theory, philosophy etc etc. Could be ordinary poets and poetry publishers do not see the point in the appropriate way.