Why I cannot submit manuscripts to publishers

Why I cannot submit manuscripts to publishers

John Bjarne Grover

The story is my first book manuscript. It was in 1993 that I started writing "Submorphemic signification" and a first draft was completed in the course of 1993, if I remember right. I sent one copy of it to Mouton Hague and one to Stanford University Press. This seems to have been in february or at least well before easter 1994, according to copies of letters I have. On 20.9.94, I sent from Oslo a letter to Lawrence Erlbaum of Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: "Dear Mr. Erlbaum. I think that I now have to inform you about the following. I submitted to you, by Judith Amsel, a manuscript entitled 'Submorphemic signification' on the 25th of May, that is, some four months ago by now. It is almost the same manuscript as I had submitted to you before Easter this year, and which I subsequently withdrew some time after [...]". Mouton gave it to peer review and I had to withdraw it from Stanford. It was in the end of 1993, could be around the time when my manuscript was drawing towards a completion, that norwegian FM Johan Jörgen Holst, according to the news, was shot in his head by an intruder. He was transferred to hospital and died on 12 january 1994, the day when the famous 'cable' went from Rwanda to UN peacekeeping forces under Annan, telling that unless UN sent peacekeeping forces, a genocide would break out. This cable was 'pulled' on the day when Holst died. The plans for the genocide seem to have developed untill april when Rwandan president Juvenal Habyiarimana was assassinated and the genocide seemed inavoidable. It was said that Francois de Grossouvre in Mitterand's administration was responsible for presenting a warning to the rwandan president but this had not been clear enough, and Grossouvre was found shot in his head with two bullets on 7 april 1994. It was said to be suicide. It is, though, very possible that the real interest, unless it really was a suicide, could have been to coup the 'gross/grand oeuvre' of mine - however juvenile, cp. 'juvenile delinquency' - the book I had submitted to review soon after the hors d'oeuvre of Holst.

Jacques Chirac's slogan for the election 2002 was 'La France en grand, la France ensemble' which in this context could sound like 'La France en grand oeuvre, la France en samleie' = 'en sexual intercourse', as if a sexual intercourse in the past should have been the reason for Grossouvre's suicide. 'Mouton Hague' = 'måtte han nagen' ('must he naked'). But the later 'Stanford University Press' was perhaps too great. 'La France en John Gröver'. Holst hors d'oeuvre = Holst oeuvre = 'hold i stövlene = 'get a grip in the wellingtons'. It is quite an art to manoeuvre the own organ into own mouth under decent government.

The 6th of april turns around to the 7th of april for Grossouvre in which case it could be about Gill 9th of april 1940 for the german-british couping of his authorship, completed two years later with the construction of the death camps. The 7 april in french could be about the 'sept-ic-ieme' breeze as the rural 'nynorsk breeze' of Hitler on 9 april 1940. I refer also to the death of Per Paust on 6 may 1999 and the bombing of the chinese embassy in Belgrade on 7 may 1999.

Then followed the Rwanda genocide and the power takeover by Blair in british Labour and then the french election 1995 was coming up: Just before this election on 23 april 1995 (Chirac took over after socialist Mitterand) there was the Oklahoma bombing on 19 april 1995 which seemed to have been about my book submission, then to John Benjamins (see johnbjarnegrover.com/abc.htm for the 'Oklahoma bombing'). On background of this, it can be conjectured that the gaullists won the election on background of the Goll-ist couping of the Gill-ist work of mine by way of the Rwanda genocide and the Oklahoma bombing and possibly much other terror. This means that angloamerican interests could have been active in constructing a gaullist victory in 1995 and it lasted untill 2012.

In short, the Rwanda genocide, with nearly one million tutsies murdered with big knives ('jump jarnegg röver', vs 'jump jarnegg grover' of Treblinka), could in theory have been carried out for the simple reason of a hijack of my authorship - because I submitted my work to review by a publisher - who then unfortunately could not accept it (one could guess that too much political power could otherwise have been lost). The submitted book was later included as part 1 of my PhD dissertation which was rejected in 1998, and when I made a new edition of this dissertation and gave it to legal deposit in Vienna, the Sendai earthquake and tsunami followed.

In short, it seems that there could have been an enormous wave of terror for keeping this hijack of my authorship up and going.

Now it is socialist again in France - from my point of view that follows after my 8 years of internet struggle with the history, and I hope time will now have come for finding a publisher for my work.

But clearly submission to peer review is not the way for me. It came out wrong in 1994. This should be easy logic. Everybody else can submit books to publisher's review, but I cannot.

I hope that somebody can help me find a publisher. Is that to ask for 'a glass of water' = 'vannglasset' = 'Banda Aceh'? I have made some kitchenbench editions of my books which thereby are available in some libraries (Moscow, Vilnius, Vienna - I think also some books in Zürich - there are a few copies here and there), and publishers who are interested could send a reviewer to look at them in a library. If it is interesting for the publisher, they can send a letter to me suggesting that we can make a contract. I hope the post functions.

For avoiding too much politics on the matter, if the publisher is not sufficiently solid and serious to buy the rights for some years without selling them on to Adolf Hitler Verlag right away (I don't know much about contract law but fancy that if e.g. the publisher goes bankrupt, the creditors could perhaps be entitled to wring out as much values as they can find, including such rights - things like these could be tempting if political interesters are out for the 'rights' to the profit from all the terror and abuse of my authorship), a 'commission' system is perhaps optimal: A contract which gives the publisher the right to make and sell copies of the book - paying royalties to me - untill either the publisher or I terminate(s) the contract. The publisher can then have the right to sell out printed copies up to a certain preappointed limited number. This publisher could in principle even be a bookshop (unless that is too oldfashioned nowadays), if only the books thereby can be provided and produced in a good enough quality (it really should be a little better than just photocopy).

It is important that my books be made available to the public in paper format because my work is serious and could be needed in many fields of study and it is not right that I shall spend the time making handmade kitchenbench copies for donations to libraries who make 'pirate' copies to those who order them from far away.

It is likely that my The Endmorgan Quartet can be traced to a jewish-philosophical sefirot format, which means that it could provide the alternative to the paperflat digital computer which was constructed on basis of british symbolic logic from about 1850 - the british 'Sapuleiu computer'. With my TEQ as poetic logic on a sefirot basis, it should be possible to construct a new logic for a 'poetic computer' (which really means basically a more advanced poetic form - the sonnet is an example of a traditional but very simple 'poetic computer'). This clearly should have been the way for a jewish-philosophical revolution from the mid 19th century - had it not crashed so disastrously into the 'british' holocaust ending in the construction of the first electronic-digital computer in 1945. What is of utmost importance is that the same does not happen again - which means that my work must not be turned into a new political 'Winckel-Wanckel motor' driven by horror chemicals and things like that. Therefore a publisher should publish the book so that it is not the exclusive field of work for new anglo-americanist political strategies.

Was the digital computer needed for making my TEQ possible? Was it a necessary detour if the 'poetic computer' is the eventual solution? I don't think so. My TEQ is written exclusively with pen and paper and inner articulation, and clearly even the function of TEQ book 14 could have been found in 1850 if the work had been started before Schumann was attacked by his Wahnsinn: One could make an oldfashioned concordance with archive cards for each word in the work with information about contexts and date of writing and - voila! - there is function 14 already analyzed! This means that the book could in principle have been written in 1850 as another development of the logic of those times - and then perhaps the world would have looked different today.

This concordance (of my TEQ book 14 on 'morphemic signification') could even have been the background of the Costa Concordia disaster in Italy recently - apparently preannounced in MLR? - although probably not the Concorde disaster in Paris in 2000 (where the airplane crashed into a hotel in Gonesse). I suppose the rats were fleeing from the sinking ship (it should be a 'safe rat' to swim in to the nearby coast when it was only a few metres away). The sefirot format could be the biggest thing in history when it comes to finding an alternative way - instead of the 'Sapuleiu computer' - and 7 April 1994 with the death of Grossouvre was not the right way.

Paul Celan was mentioned in the will of Ivan Goll (cp. 'Wanckel-Motor') along with the poets Robert Ganzo, Alain Bosquet and Yanette Deletang-Tardif from Neuilly. It is not impossible that the reason for keeping my career at a zero is this 'Nully' in the will of Goll. Is this also the reason for politics against the religion of 'mosquet'? We must hope that this 'Nully' is not the basis for French or rather International Power.

With Gill-Goll as the basic scheme, one can guess that Johng/Jin = Yin/Yang is the new format, targeting China. Cp. the equinumerous Treblinka relative to Verdun and hence Rwanda relative to the alleged earthquake of Shansi in China. With this I/A, one can speculate that Yanette Deletang-Tardif even could have been the background of the RAF = Rote Armee Fraktion, for Yinette Deleting-Ti-RAF. In the worst case, this RAF and I/A could even be the reason for the rumours of 'islamistic terror'. But then it is all about 'the will of Ivan Goll' = 'the intention of the Wanckel-motor' which could mean the intention of the 'rockpedos' carrying underearth bombs producing earthquakes a la Sendai and Banda Aceh - if such 'rockpedos' exist.

I have earlier listed a series of possible and hypothetical raw abuses of me in my childhood, corresponding to the addresses I lived in, whereby the first address Molde corresponded to the hypothesis of helmet lifted probably a few days after birth. The point with uh abuse would have been the trumpeting and trommelwirbels announcing it in advance - for the explicit purpose of showing that not any single state in the world would be able to prevent it from happening - a demonstration of power. I have not searched much for the trommelwirbels but looked up a few newspieces from 1957 on the internet and found some coincidental ones which could be such trommelwirbels: 1) The massacre of 303 males in Beni Imane near Melousa on 29 may 1957, one month before my birth officially on 29 june 1957. That could mean 'Melousa' = 'med lusa' = 'with the lice' = the lifted top helmet placed nearby when the man with the leg masturbated over the cortex. 2) This situation seems to be contained in the "Europäisches Übereinkommen zur friedlichen Beilegung von Streitigkeiten - Abgeschlossen in Strassburg am 29. April 1957" (see http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/0_193_231/index.html): It contains four points in the introductory article 1, about the conditions which apply for a state to hurry up and help e.g. a child: "Die Hohen Vertragschliessenden Parteien werden alle zwischen ihnen entstehenden völkerrechtlichen Streitigkeiten dem Internationalen Gerichtshof zur Entscheidung vorlegen, insbesondere Streitigkeiten über a. die Auslegung eines Vertrags; (cp. the lifting of the helmet 'with the lice') b.irgendwelche Fragen des Völkerrechts; (cp. the erection = Beni Imane over it) c. das Bestehen einer Tatsache, die, wenn sie bewiesen wäre, die Verletzung einer internationalen Verpflichtung bedeuten würde; (cp. the clot of ejaculated material landing on the cortex and the socalled 'Octogon project' possibly pre-announced in the Eisenhower doctrine of 5 january 1957) d. Art und Umfang der wegen Verletzung einer internationalen Verpflichtung geschuldeten Wiedergutmachung. (cp. the inability of the child to return the clot to its owner after the top lid had been put in place again - it can be hard to get the clot out again if the intercourse were a 'mistake'). I don't know when the international agreement was ratified but this seems anyhow to count as a case of possible trommelwirbel for this story. 3) The future EU was founded with the socalled 'Roman contract' of 25 march 1957, 96 days before my birth. 4) On 16 may 1957, which was 44 = 4 x 11 days before my birth, Paul-Henri Spaak was appointed new secretary general of NATO - could perhaps have meant something (cp. the driver of princess Diana at her alleged death). 5) On 15 june 1957, Oklahoma celebrated its semi-centennial statehood and a 1957 Plymouth Belvedere was buried 'in a time capsule' (according to an internet source) to be opened 50 years later on June 15, 2007. The amalgam in my teeth of 1970 - school dentist was called Aulie - could be compared with 'bly' = 'lead', affecting more or less the 'bel vedere' of the facade 50 years later. The Oklahoma bombing is notable in this context.

In addition, I have mentioned the possible 'chemicals' in the blood in Hammerfest - these were confirmed by the custody parents who said that I (probably 1959) had swallowed a 'nut', against which I am or was hysterically allergic, and nearly died from the antihistaminic rejection shock causing apparent asthma etc. The destruction of the teeth in 1970 (cp. also the Oklahoma story) is the only absolutely safe knowledge I have of childhood abuse. One could guess that one could make a scheme postulating 16 main variants of abuse - with later abuse of authorship being one of them. Cp. the angloamerican 'keys to heaven'.

The incredible thing is that nobody has said any single word to me about this story, or, as far as I know, any public statement.

PS 2013 I should perhaps add that the story of Grossouvre does not necessarily suggest that France organized the genocide - it rather could suggest that they told about its background in that way. However, after I arrived at the assumption that the 1999 bombing campaign on Kosovo could have been for the simple reason that the norwegian embassy in London is in Belgrave Square, with a possible reference to the throw-out of me through the school door in probably early 1971, as if it landed me at Hyde Park Corner, the name of Grossouvre could of course also have been about this Grosvenor Crescent. Chirac's 2002 'ensemble' election slogan could have suggested an alternative to this.

In 1997 I sent a letter to Midori, and in 1999 the Kosovo bombing campaign broke out.