Summary on my role in the political mythos theatre

Summary on my role in the political mythos theatre

John Bjarne Grover

They have created the fiction of the VERY POWERFUL MAN - that is, Satan - in order to have a goodenough reason to throw dirt on me

and that could be for creating the principle of throwing dirt not on the politicians who had deserved it (those who organize the terror etc) but on the small man instead - for making the unilateral monarchic power structure - for enhancing the divide in the gap between the masses of low IQ and the upper 'secret intelligence' class of all sorts of privileges.

The principle could have been intended for installation into a Bürgersteig strategy - for spreading this global class division over the world.

The story of England goes that it all happened with the papal excommunication of Henry VIII after the apparent murders of Leonardo and Rafael, and instead of finding a more christian king the britons founded a new anti-catholic church with Henry as its new head - after which it seems, according to this theory, that England systematically murdered all the best italian cultural talents and brains untill the mafia arose to protect the vulnerable bodies, they intrigued up (a theory, this, I dont have much data for it) the french revolution for getting their agent Napoleon to power to donate the empire to Wellington, after which they constructed Hitler in a 100 year program which battled the germans, after which the Vietnam and Iraq wars humiliated USA and paved the way for the age-old british desire of a final blow on the Vatican - for the ultimate goal of getting Henry VIII back into the catholic church again - could be through a hole in the roof of the catheral. Why all this? If the britons are truly monarchic they may feel that, correspondingly, there is only one pope church-head in the world, and if he is not british he is vatican, and they cannot rest before they are back under the catholic wings again. It is the british cosmic angst of doom and damnation and the prospects of finding a St.Josef on the ramp to Heaven - for which reason, in their state of excommunication, they have constructed their empiricism in the hope of a final battling of Bad Conscience. A sort of ostrichian policy that would be. You can see the rationale for the andorran enclave rising there in the technology of the new millenium with its concomitant 'new logic'.

But clearly one single small snowflake falling down from eternity into history should be enough to make all that edifice crumble: Seeing only one such small flake should be enough to restore e.g. the potential reality in a St.Josef.

The fiction of the very powerful man could be traced to the idea that Blair and Clinton should have been my two official sisters, that the Kennedy assassination when I was 6 was a revenge from me for his mistreatment of my early life, that Gröver/'Mengele' should have taken the place of pope Paul VI for some time, etc etc. The world is struggling heroically against this 'Dirty Beast', for which reason e.g. my doctorate dissertation was rejected, and when I wrote my appeal, the US embassies in Dar-es-Salaam and in Nairobi were bombed in a twin bombing, and a peace meeting in Omagh was bombed, for the formula 'on a political basis' as should have been the contents of my appeal. Hence the 'Dirty Beast' seems also to control Al-Qaida and similar terror organizations - and clearly constitutes a major threat against US security. This is the pathetic (and humiliating!) american mythos they seem to try and construct (from which one can also quickly draw the conclusion that the terror is US, could be even governmental security) - for which the purpose seems to be to create a division between government and people. More and more of the administrative reality is going into the secret archives, and it is very possible that Hitler was english and the world will never come to learn it in their school books. And, even worse, that ordinary scientific knowledge is stamped secret to a larger and larger extent. Or is it the other way round - that it was much worse earlier - and that the role assigned to me is that the planned class division will not succeed and the terror will go down?

The bad part of the story could be that the political intrigue aims at using such 'transfinite' means of creation of matter for their intrigues - or dividing one lower class from a higher 'intelligence' class, possibly including the classic formation of a class of high priests holding the mysteries in their hands. This clearly is a very unfortunate development. Secret agents from the 'intelligence business' rehearsing their snowflakes on victims for turning and hijacking - all that is a bad waste of resources and makes the development of human values stand still while the surveillance technology is speeding up, for the formation of a global class division which exploits the lower classes for privileges of the higher.

Abuse of my person - or other relevant persons in the mythology - is not right.

As of late 2013, there is still not much progress in my career as far a publication is concerned, and I hope to have my books published as soon as possible - but clearly the situation I have described here makes it difficult for me to submit works for review since it is all too tempting for politics to grasp the opportunity to make power out of it - and then it can go very wrong way. I hope therefore that somebody can help me find a decent publisher.

If there is a reality in the assumption of a role of mine as eichmann family tree root for example for a number of cultural people exposed in the media, it could be to be the 'missing link' between the elastics of the earthquakes and the snowflakes of transfinite intrigue.

The program of these intrigue-makers seems to be to lower the human standards of 'the others' in order to make own figure look better.

I add that there is an apparent butterfly in MLR on my genetic parents with october 1961: While it seems clear that my genetic parents are Sachs and Celan, there is apparently also a secondary indexical reference contained to Nathan Milstein and apparently Elisabeth Leonskaja. While these probably are not my genetic parents, they could of course be the genetic parents to some other essential person for whom a swap-function relative to me is constructed - which could mean that a certain indexation of 'Elisabeth' relative to Leonie (= Nelly) Sachs is obtained. That does not mean that an 'Elisabeth' is my mother, but it could of course have a political function.

Consider this: If 'Modern Language Review' has a political function of encoding political and historic events in advance, and if the great earthquake of San Francisco on 18 april 1906 was 'pre-announced' in MLR april 1906, how can one explain that it is still, more than 100 years later, not published that the quake was a terrorist attack and not a natural quake? (The news could be: "The San Francisco earthquake was a deep-dug bomb in the night following Caruso 'singing in Carmen' for the encoding of the archetype which was used for getting Hitler to power in 1933"). Does that mean that the elastics of earthquakes and the snowflakes of transfinite intrigue is the only thing which controls politics of today? If so, does that mean that politics no longer is in the service of the people in any other sense than of being a nation's attempt to incorporate and accumulate crime for getting it under control? I mean, if MLR pre-announced the quake of San Francisco by 'great power in the underworld'? If the world thereby is united in the construction of a new global monarchy, is that for the single purpose of trying to get Henry VIII into the catholic church again - in the hope of getting the fear of death which the fear of doom at St.Peter could mean under control?

If only one little snowflake falling out of eternity is enough to invoke this angst from the deep stores of british empiricism, then it is a pity indeed if the source of this angst is recognized as poetry. There is a good sense in the idea that poetry = poiesis = creation of matter. This could be the background of the phenomenon of the angloamerican war against poetry, and if one sees the more than 100 years tradition as a war against 'poiesis' (that which invokes the angst), it is easy to see why the 'intelligence business' claims to be the only one able to handle the phenomenon while in reality they are the ones who constitute a real block against progress in this field of study.

There are, as far as I know, two main cosmogonic theories: The Big Bang theory which says that the amount of matter is constant and all of it was created in the beginning, and the Steady State theory which says that the cosmos expands but its density is constant by the continuous creation of new matter. Could be these theories are not only cosmogonic but political as well.