A summary of march 2015

A summary of march 2015

John Bjarne Grover

Government is dependent on information for making relevant decisions and therefore those who provide the information constitute a decisive 'mid level' of power. Since probably about the mid 19th century, this mid level has been internationalizing and today constitute a global network which in effect could be about an angloamerican empire. Colonialism is not over yet. My guess is that USA constitute an important part of this story due to the special territorial circumstances: The land belonged to the indians and it is an eternal truth that 'all empires collapse' - but after the indians had been warred down there are not so many of them left and it is not possible for these to require their territories back again. Which means that the american empire will not collapse - and then they have a problem. It is called Bad Conscience and seems to be constitutive for the global empire.

A fresh thought tells me that the american socalled 'civil war' was probably not about south against north - it was probably only a war against the indians. But I have no data for this fresh thought.

Adolf Hitler dressed up in 'indian' ideas, though - such as his swastika was telling of. Adolf Hitler was made for consolidating the global 'secret intelligence network' which constitute the new angloamerican empire. If this is a transformation of the british empire, it could find its anchor in the non-collapsibility of the american empire.

The trick of Adolf Hitler was that his real name was Paul Marshall and he was probably an angloamerican secret intelligence agent, and so was his cabinet as well, and they worked (as it seems from some data) on order from London. After the war, Germany and german self-esteem were flat and everybody had their sympathies with the angloamericans - that is, the power of the global secret intelligence network - who had made the war. It means that ADOLF HITLER WON THE WAR and the sympathies of most people over the world.

This is a theory of mine for which I have cited some evidence, such as the data in Modern Language Review and the attempt on Lenin and his death, could be even the authorship of Henrik Ibsen (which include such works as Eyolf Little = Adolf Hitler and Master builder Solnes = Bygmester Solnes = Paul Marshall, not Paul P.Antschel), but I am no historian and the theory needs more consolidation from empirical data.

It seems that Ibsen's authorship in total constitute a unity which holds the whole 'administrative world' intact. Whether this is due to the literary and admininstrative reality of Ibsen's time or whether he was a secret agent for the angloamerican empire, I don't know. For example, "A doll's house" could be a title based on the name of 'Adolphe Sax' who made the saxophone - and the piece could be about the jewish poet Nelly Sachs whose real name was Leonie Sachs for the administrative concept of 'de[t] on[d]es akse' = 'the axis of evil', for the idea that the jews constituted the principle of evil and a cultural and political role which this global intelligence network planned to take - and the jews were a real cultural and political factor in those days. The question about Ibsen is therefore whether he worked on behalf of those who wanted to install the political concepts via the literary scene or whether the literature of those days interpreted the political world. An argument in favour of the theory that Ibsen could have served to implement the political intrigue can perhaps be seen in the fact that every book published today must have a socalled ISBN number on the cover. In the worst case, this could even have been planned before Ibsen started his work. Henrik VIII etc.

The reason why I had to invest much work into trying to bring these ideas to the surface in spite of my limited resources is that I personally seems to have been made for a role in this political theatre - and the role seems to be 1) to prevent that the real identity of Hitler as Marshall be generally acknowledged enough to enter the school books, and 2) to be the 'american empire' the collapse of which could have brought the global intelligence network to a collapse. By invoking general sympathies for the idea that this 'american empire' must be brought to collapse, they also hope to harvest general sympathies for the idea that Hitler's true identity must not be brought to the surface.

A part of the program on me seems to be the assumed identity of me with the 'american empire'. This would have been the reason for a more or less personal involvement of US democrat presidents with me - and if the theory has a rooting in reality that the american administration also is illegally surveyeing my person and work in order to 'identify' with it, it would be for strengthening this administrative function of me - probably an offspring of Nelly Sachs - for engineering the concept of 'the principle of evil'. 'The dirty beast in the revelation' seems to be the label of this construction on me.

The question is then whether this 'american empire' is supposed to be battled in the sense of 'american power' or only in the sense of 'jewish genetics'. That is, whether the americans hope to gain global power through the construction or whether they hope to be on the second level under the control of the british power. This could be the fundamentals of the two-party system of USA - and then the theory could even obtain that the system functions by way of an 'agency' function of the US democrat party which is held barely under control by the US republican party.

It would be the global network power of the 'mid level' of secret intelligence power which makes for this. The US democrat party would find its internal rationale in the hope of gaining control with this international power network.

My guess is that the 'octogon' on my person 1977-82 - my person being involved as third part in 8 triangles of marital character, preceded by a year 1975 of substantial threatening character for me to have a 'free choice' - is reflected in some detail in the Eisenhower doctrine of 1957, not so long before I was born. (Eisenhower leaked just enough of the plans to have it all 'barely under republican control'). If this 'octogon' was organized or under the control of american administration, it could have been for constructing a sort of 'angelic' power residing invisibly in the global public space. The principle could then have been for the idea that terror is an angelic phenomenon, that angels are 'terrible', could be even for an ultimate Engl-land responsibility claim on terror implemented by the global secret intelligence network.

It seems to me that terror generally is controlled by this global intelligence network. Could be this is the reason why it so often seems to be linked to the US democrat party.

My guess is that terror nowadays is under total administrative control.

Which means that if e.g. a car bomb goes off in Iraq, it is under the control of probably that part of american administration who hopes to gain control with the global network. It also means that e.g. 'islamic terror' is controlled in a similar way. Could be there are plans of a new Hitler - and then islam could be the new judaism. It is said that the US president is briefed every morning by the intelligence chief - that does not mean that one can find surveillance data which proves that Obama has okayed the bombing of the mosques in Jemen or the aircrash in France, but it is well possible that he could have read about such plans in advance on a paper given to him. He is not pressed or pulled by the nose to point to the plans and say 'stop it', but one sometimes read news of american drones having gone into e.g. pakistani territory for taking some assumed terrorists there - and it should not be forgotten that the whole story is the puzzling phenomenon of the international intelligence network constituting a power factor which could not be curbed by official administative power.

A car alarm went off outside the furniture sellers as I walked down Märzstrasse in the afternoon on probably 20 march 2015. It seems that this was not long before the bombing in northern Syria and possibly also the 2 mosques in Jemen. It could be that the car alarm was of the same type as the one in lower Rothenturmstrasse outside a baker's shop some years earlier. Could be it means 'Juden raus', could be it means 'John Bagre Mover' (by GR/M rewrite). But it could anyhow mean the puzzling phenomenon. A man was washing in the window of a flat that I can see from my window in the morning not long before the aircrash of the flight 4U 9525 in France on 24 march 2015. Could be the tenant of the flat was not at home. (They hopefully did not empty the flat!) On 23 march 2015 I had received an email from IG Autorinnen / Autoren (author's interest organization) with subject line "Copyright4Freedom - Europäische Urheberrechtskampagne".

It is important to observe that my authorship (or work and life in general) is not involved in terror and is not a part of e.g. islamistic terror. I could be an offspring of Nelly Sachs - which does not mean 'the principle of evil'.

If there are plans of organizing a hijack of the authority to this authorship of mine, that would be from the same political interests who could hope to control terror for a new angloamerican 'Hitler'. That would not be the right thing.

My view is that the whole story is going to run out into the sand, that the global system will steer towards a state of global equilibrium without much power left in the state borders. This means that I support official and non-secret internationalism but not the international border-crossing secret mafioso networks. It is the secrecy which is the problem for the global development - what makes it possible to spread confusion fog on the landscape and swap roles without the public getting the chance to discover it (such as Hitler and Marshall). Hopes of gaining control with the international terrorist network for gaining global power and glory thereby will not come to be so interesting. The true story of Hitler and Marshall and all that will then be also told in the school books of history. It is more interesting to build a new and better world than to destroy it - and everybody agree on this if only they get the chance. The purpose with the power to control and suppress and exploit was to make others suffer the labour which was needed for securing existence. New technology will make this less interesting.

Added on 28 march 2015:

A study of the situation shows how easy it is: It is the secrecy on the history which lends power to the 'services', and if politicians want to regain the democratic power which they should have, they easily get to it by downgrading and publishing those secrets which provide the services with power.

But if the services lose power, they also lose control with the responsibility to the terror they could be behind - this adds to the theory that it is Bad Conscience which is the story.

It may perhaps be a little coincidental that Paul Marshall (if that was the name) was a briton, I suppose if it were the international 'services' who made him he could in principle have come from any country, but if that was his nationality, this could have lent a special ruling role and power to England after the war.

This is the Big Farce: The idea that if people only believe hard enough that Adolf Hitler really was an austrian, this 'special power' which England has enjoyed after the war will eventually come to land in Austria - instead of in Marshall-England. Which is ridiculius, of course. That story could also be the origin of Norway and the Klipra connection. Who was it then? It could have been the vikings, the Heimskringla sagas which could have been as fictional as Hitler in Berlin seems to have been. Leiv Eirikson is said to have discovered America.

The 'services' seem to have designed a strategy for getting the public call for 'get the secret out' under control - in the sense of 'get John Grover out of Zinckgasse'. That should mean that I am the Big Secret and not Paul Marshall - the trick is in the role I was made for - of keeping Paul Marshall secret. This is a misunderstanding, of course: Getting me out means preserving the secret of Marshall and the ridiculous hope of Austria thereby gaining the power which England has had after the war. In the mean time, the services hope to make a new Hitler.

Could be the austrian services feel that they are to be in a relation of challenge relative to my person. That would be a big misunderstanding.

Particularly wrong it would be if e.g. Clinton should happen to be a 'secret of Zinckgasse' - and instead of getting that secret out they try to get me out. It could be a strategy applied for several cases - I have moved more than 50 times in the course my life.

Downgrade the secrets of history! That solves all these problems.

Most people will probably say, if they get the news 70 years later that Adolf Hitler and his government were britons and not germans, that "this was not permitted" - to keep it secret that long. Where are our faiths and social enthusiasm today? Is truth totally uninteresting?

In short, it is probably very easy to solve the problem - it is just to downgrade the big secrets and the politicians have the power of democracy back in their hands again. That could be urgent before the 'services' manage to make a new Hitler instead of the truth of the former being told. Stop sucking the old secrets as if they were anything worth. Tell them out loud and the world starts moving forwards again instead of sinking deeper into the swamps of Bad Conscience.

The bombing of the mosques in Yemen recently seems to have escalated the tension in the country and the socalled Houthis are blamed for it. Saudi-Arabia sends airplanes for airstrikes on the country. The mosque bombings are likely to be political theatre for blaming Harry Houdini (the entertainer who could get out of any confinement - or any tenancy situation?) for the political problems - his name in norwegian ('hode[t] inni' = 'the head just inside') means 'to get the head just inside [the vagina]' - for the idea that the octogon of my personal history is a political fact and not a matter of morals either this way or that due to the intention. That fact is ascribed to marital coitus assumed to be equivalent to a chomskyan phrase structure in the electronics of the brain or a ferry that takes you over the fjord (instead of forcing you to drive all the way round). But then it must be the same ferry every day, says the logic, otherwise a 'third party' ferry will lead to logical confusion and disaster. Therefore, says the logic, the blame for the political confusion is to be put on the third part of a marital triangle never mind what is the reason for it. It means a strategy granting higher level knowledge to social institutions such as marriage while denying the role of recursive matter for solving the chomskyan paradoxes. It means, in short, that if 'hode inni' is the cause of the problems and Saudi Arabia has to send airplanes for solving the problem, if this is lifted back to austrian circumstances, it could mean (I dont know if that is any relevant idea) that Germany or even NATO could solve the problem of a future Hitler coming up in some years' time by similar airstrikes on Austria now, to stop the formation of a new Hitler or new catholic-protestant 'only chance you have' strategy and things like that. The hands he Chad etc.

But all this is political carousel for avoding that the truth be told: If the cat is let out of the sack, the whole nazi empire collapses.

It is possible that the aircrash in France on 24 march was for imitating the 'auto-masche' ('Kinderhilfe' poem 3, see also the film 'The councelor' from 08:07 onwards) of my recursive graphics (see this page) which can be traced to a certain few lines in my 'Kinderhilfe' poem 172 - written years before the graphics occurred:

Hinter seinem Visier
blickt er nach anderen Welten
und der rasierte Pferd
hat sich seinen Untertan.

- which even could mean that the 'self'-formation of the magical graphics has its shaping function in these poetic lines of mine. That is no small matter! It could be about a major scientific breakthrough. But the aircrash (notice that an official brother-in-law of mine is or was called 'Lars Andreas Loe' - and when Ragnar Söderlind once was locked into a toilet he asked me to roll up some musical notes and push them in through the ventilation hole while waiting for the locksmith - I rolled up Grieg's 'Lyric Pieces' and pushed them in to him) could have been made for 'hijacking' my work and discovery for bringing it over onto the fields of power games of the services who want to keep this secret encapsulated - that is, to keep me and my work secret instead of letting the secret of Hitler-Marshall out - that secret which is the source of the illegitimate power of the 'services'. Which probably also is the power-services who are behind much terror. That is not good behaviour - to hijack and encapsulate such discoveries as this one of mine only for turning it into such power - and nothing which serves the interests of the society.

It is the combination of the mosque bombings on 20 march and the aircrash of 24 march (did I see somebody washing inside the frames of an opened window in Zinckgasse an hour or two before the crash?) which turns this into a political carousel of little value. Millions of pages can be written about all that fog. Why not brush it all aside and come to the truth instead?

Added on 3 april 2015:

I now, on Good Friday 2015, make a discovery which is perhaps relevant to make aware of. I firmly believed that the opening minutes of the film "The councelor" could be a plagiarism of the opening 5 poems of my book "Kinderhilfe" which I firmly believed that nobody so far had seen before I published it - that was after the film was finished. Now I find another 'plagiarism' which could throw some interesting light on this correlation - but that is in the Odyssey, which is much older. It is in song IV, the opening verses 1-160, that follow my first 5 poems quite well - untill the point where my acoustic poetry bends off from the visual film (poem 6 'ich schlief ungewöhnlich wohl' vs. the film 'ich schliff ungewöhnlich wohl' - around Od.IV,161 that would be). Poem 1 = appr. verses 1-29, poem 2 = appr. 30-54, poem 3 = appr. 55-75, poem 4 = appr. 76-119 and poem 5 = appr. 120-160. This means that the 'Auto-Masche' is found in the very interesting lines 57-58 (must be studied in greek for its ambiguity) - which take it further on to the comparison of the Odyssey with my PEB, and, peculiarly, the correlation starts with PEB #100 which I have published and discussed earlier on the web. It runs up to PEB 104 = 'STEIN OF LANGUAGE" - and that 'stone of language' is precisely the 'Auto-Masche' in the film.