The reason why nobody has told about 'Paul Marshall'

John Bjarne Grover

As the observant reader can have noticed, it seems that the western world - or parts of the western world - is busily concerned with constructing Hitler once again. Most notably, it seems that the project is to construct a new Hitler for making it possible for England to conduct yet another genocide - while the public blame for it be dumped on Austria.

It must be considered a miracle that the austrians do not protest against this if indeed it be the situation. Or, even more, they could even seem to participate in the construction via the 'scarlet mark'.

Is it possible to understand it?

It is possible to understand it and to understand that it cannot be right.

The reason would be that the knowledge and technological potential in 'recursive matter' could be so immense - nuclear weapons could be a mere trifle in comparison - that the development of this new knowledge must go so slowly and under such heavy control that nobody would dare to do a mistake. If they do make a mistake in the development, not only themselves and their families but even their entire people risk being exterminated.

That would resemble the cultural situation of the first half of the 19th century - the jewish revolution in healthy progress - when it seems that somebody panicked and decided to punish the 'overly quick developers' with an extermination of the whole jewish race. Hence the holocaust 1933-45.

What was going on in Rwanda some years ago I dont know. Well, tutsies are often chewing. The number of victims in Rwanda was the same as in Treblinka, Verdun, Shansi. (I notice my Vranda door recently). Jan P.Jansen, Jan.P.Syse ('Notre-Dame'?), Jiang Zemin.

Think about it: If the formula for recursive matter should be E = M2C2, could be on background of an archetypal piece of matter, and if it be assumed that the energy remains invariant, it means that even very small particles of recursive matter - typically housedust taking shape out of nothing in the air - can lead to a dramatic reduction in the speed of light and hence the future is lifted gently into the present. But that means that the development from the present to that (near) future is already determined - cp. also Aristotle's concept of 'entelechies' - and then no power on earth can change that course of history. That is power of the historic consciousness, with power resembling a veritable semiotic nuclear bomb. It could be these particles of housedust which control our historic consciousness. But if this control gets out of control, so to speak, with uncontrolled 'overly quick' development and research, it could lead to riots and revolutions and other things - including possibly diseases.

Therefore the global community seem to have 'accepted' the british genocides as a tough means for keeping the scholarship in leash. The british factor is then probably considered the crown - of a global monarchy, so to speak.

This is the reason why nobody has told about Paul Marshall - if that was the real name of the historic Hitler 1933-45. It is the reason why people still think the holocaust and the nazi government was german-austrian - and not british, as it then seems to have been.

That should suffice for a serious crisis of confidence between the people of the world and their politicians. And that crisis could be why Marilyn Monroe ('dann müssen Sie zu Martes gehen'?) married Joe di Maggio - to get that people's spontaneous impulse - when they get the facts of history - under control. Jodie Foster was a film star already in 1964-65, and her full name Alicia Christian Foster could have been the background of the bombings of Moscow 1999 after I applied for name-change in march 1999. Could be 'Edward Forster' is the name it is about - a potential new Paul Marshall. John W. Hinckley tried to impress the actress by shooting at the presidential candidate. All this tells that there are indeed reasons to believe that there could be a good reason for a serious crisis in the people's confidence in their politicians, and this crisis could be called Forster or Marshall: As if the grandiose mistake of not yet having told the people about Marshall were not enough, now instead they even seem to try and make the same mistake over again!

It seems to be recursive matter which is the reason.

This is the explanation which is understandable - some would even say it could be goodenough. Therefore many or even most politicians seem to accept the development of a new Hitler for eventually dumping the blame on Austria - since it would constitute a mighty whip for keeping scholarship on recursive matter under control.

You think this is a goodenough reason?

I dont think so. But the news are brimming over with the threat from islamism - which could mean a new sort of 'judaism' in this recursive sense of it. When REKUSTAD and the flooding of it seems to be a cornerstone in the construction of the political myth, that probably means RECURSION - could be with flooding from the scarlet mark. Could be 'Ronald Reagan' meant that flooding of pus...

You think the scaring ghosts are sufficiently scary to make another genocide necessary? After all, it is not so very certain that recursive matter is so very dangerous. Nazi philosophy probably tries to make it look scary.

If the energy is held constant, it means that historic consciousness is under control. But then freethinking can lead to dangerous energy discharges?

It seems to be this sort of threat which is the propaganda value.

Frankly, it looks like much propaganda and humbug, and it could be that England should tidy up in their apparently lax attitudes to genocide. Could be they dont need them. The political logic seems to make for a more or less identity of recursive matter with catholic transubstantiation - which means that the crisis goes back to Henry VIII and the formation of the anglican church.

Put differently, it is very possible that the real history is not that recursive matter is so dangerous but rather that England went astray (in an 'overly quick' development - cp.the 'recursion') after Henry and developed an unhealthy 'sausage-logical' spirituality which came to extend the british empire globally under a spiritualism wherein genocide is one of the three defining parametres, the other two being cannibalism and pederasty, and that the british society quite simply does not function well if there is not a little genocide going on in the world every now and then. If so, then it could be that all this reasoning on recursive matter is nothing but self-referential pretext for continueing the unfortunate spirituality - a pretext which unfortunately also serves to bring the world's mafia, security business, underworld generally into the service of this 'british-spiritual' empire. Could be it resembles organized crime on a global scale.

The problem is that people - politicians included - know not so much about the phenomenon of recursive matter. What is it really?

It is something, and that is the reason why the history is still going.

It can be urgently important that people come to knowledge of these 'scary ghosts' and their possibly illusive character before a new hitlerite era be allowed to develop.

But, again, it is of course possible that recursive matter indeed is a rich potential resource which must be developed under controlled conditions and safe circumstances - but that should mean under serious scientific and not under powerful mafioso control.

Consider this: It is fully possible that all this is going on and that the temporary plan is to dump the blame for a new genocide on me - due to the scarlet mark. It is possible that my computer and life is under illegal surveillance and that my 'presence' is spread in the public space in terms of my work circulated via networks of media controlled by the same political mafia - while my person be kept secret for making these strategies run smoothly. That would be for spreading the idea of a diffuse threat against our country, our culture, our future. The very Ole Devold! It could even be that the attempt on the pope in 1980 was made for the purposes of turning roles around and claim that I was the mystery force behind the attempt, turning the 'ali aqua' of the scarlet mark around. Clearly all such strategies are not going to succeed in the long run - they are made for creating the impression that we are on the right track - untill the genocide is over and the blame for it be easily dumped on e.g. Austria or Germany.

It is not likely that such strategies would be for decent political motives.

This means that if I should send a manuscript to a publisher and it be rejected for the political reasons of keeping my person and authorship secret, that would be for the purpose of making a new Hitler. Which cannot be right, says the people who do not want a new Hitler. But the same people probably says that 'our politicians cannot probably go for another Hitler' and therefore they are sometimes inclined to believe the Marshall-propaganda that it is I who should be the new Hitler or what makes a new Hitler possible. Which is wrong, of course.

This state of confusion is clearly in most countries not in line with the democratic constitutions and should not be continued.

Does there exist yet another 'unknown mystery' - in addition to the recursive matter - which the public does not know about and which should be a 'goodenough reason'? "It is secret", say perhaps the politicians. I dont know of any such and if it should exist I would take it for granted that it is of the same sort as the matter which looks a little recursive from the viewpoint of church history.

There are two lines of political orientation: For power or for truth. Slavery is sheer power, decent salaries to workers for avoiding exploitation is truth-based. The world steers towards a state of truth and we should not go for another century of Hitler.



© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 24 june 2014