Goodness-driven economy as a solution to the ukrainian crisis
John Bjarne Grover
Ukraine has existed as independent state for only about 33 years. By its declaration of independence in 1991 they just annexed all the russian property there without paying for it - a good part of the buildings in the main cities were built and/or owned by russians or the russian state. This of course led to problems with their new authority and (as I guess on basis of meagre data) they started harassing russian nationals in the east - which did not help much but rather the harassment increased into serious persecutions which was the reason why Russia eventually had to stop it by taking back the eastern regions in which the persecutions were the worst (as I guess here). By referenda in the east in september 2022 - after the russian re-annexation - it was shown that around 95% of the population wanted to be russian citizens rather than ukrainian. Since that the war has been mainly Ukraine's attempts to get these eastern regions back again - Russia has not really tried to advance any further, except for a few demolishions of houses they probably really own.
The question is therefore whether the european enthusiasm for the ukrainian stance is the same as an enthusiasm for expanding european territories and control - that is, an imperialist intention which could be related to the presence of that nazi-mythological attitude (abuse and swap-mania relative to me, for example) which also has been a problem in Ukraine.
It is likely that if Ukraine on basis of the referenda and the economic history had agreed to the new borders without the eastern regions, the war could have been ended long ago.
Therefore an alternative history could have been this: If it were agreed that Ukraine could not handle their new freedom in 1991 without persecuting russian nationals because they owed Russia very much money, then other countries could (in Europe and elsewhere) have collected and paid these money to Russia and brought an end to the persecutions in Ukraine thereby. It would have meant that Ukraine then would have come in a dependency of gratitude not to Russia but to the rest of Europe. This could have prevented the war. Now these money have been paid from the west to Ukraine anyhow but mainly in terms of weapons for enhancing destruction and persecution - and that would have been for supporting the state that had carried out the persecutions - that is, for supporting persecution against the russians.
This alternative version which history could have taken would have been in conformity with my ideas of a goodness-driven (and not principled competitive) economy - it would mean giving the money to the victims of terror-and-monkey-business - as an investment in peace instead of warfare. It would also have meant a general attitude of 'opening the subsets of humanity' - here the subset called the ukrainian unilateral dependency on Russia by way of the debt they could not handle. When this dependency is opened westwards by way of giving the money to Russia and hence turning the dependency of gratitude from north towards west, it could have prevented the destructive development of the history.
But Ukraine feels perhaps that it was they who were 'victims of russian terror-and-monkey-business'? Well, if Europe had provided debt relief for Ukraine so that they were not so indebted to Russia, that would have been equivalent with helping Ukraine - and so it would have made sense from that point of view as well.
How could such payment to Russia have been defended in budget negotiations?
If the historic account makes sense, it would probably mean that there would be a (probably phonological) connection between the russian owners of the properties in Ukraine and the russian victims of persecution in Ukraine. This could perhaps have been verified empirically.
But it is not the debt but the problem of NATO presence in Ukraine which is the main concern, could be a russian viewpoint. Well, if Ukraine struggled against Russia for reasons of debts they could not pay, this could (by a goodness-driven european donation to Russia) have been turned around to a struggle against dependency on Europe instead and then it is not so certain that Ukraine would have been interested in a NATO membership any longer - not the least because their current need for NATO membership could be because they need muscle to defend themselves against the creditors. Therefore a goodness-driven economy would perhaps not have led to Zelensky as president of Ukraine but rather one who would be less west- or at least NATO-orientated. Could be Ukraine then would have preferred peaceful co-existence with Russia instead of struggle for membership in NATO.
As far as the empiricism (verification) by phonological parametres is concerned, it can be seen from my scheme in this article - a more concise and up-to-date account is given in volume 4 pages 1212-1214 - see also pages 1209-1211 - that this is equivalent to the basis for a goodness-driven economy (numbers in the lefthand columns refer to verses in Acts 10 - see the details in the article):
Information transfer = LOGOS
1 17 48 entrance to community = the DOOR 2 25 33 goodness = parameter 1 3 21 47 apparition (divine) = fourth parameter for BODY 4 29 34 donation = HOUSE (= oikonomia)
The parametres in the paradise machine = PHONE
5 19 46 commutation/information transfer in global/universal space 6 27 35 arbitrarity (IN/OUT as aspect) = parameter 3 7 23 45 bit-reversal = parameter 2 8 31 36 free will for nature poetry; information = real value = parameter 4
The four grammar/language types = LEXIS
9 18 44 nesting = nominal type = +N-V 10 26 37 context = verbal type = -N+V 11 22 43 witness report = adjectival type = +N+V 12 30 38 prepositional type = -N-V
Triadic butterfly sign, the working of the machine = LEKTON
13 20 42 negation, paradox, binary values = lekton = HOUSE 14 28 39 gender = BODY, city = body 15 24 41 relegation of authority/control to universal muse = 4th par. = ORAL 16 32 40 three triadic semiotic spaces = three basic parameters giving the
fourth = COGNITIVE
It is seen that the four parametres of goodness-driven economy (goodness, bit-reversal, arbitrarity, opening subsets of humanity) all fall under the second group ('PHONE') when elements 2 and 5 swap - that means combining the PHONE and the LOGOS for a 'phonological' solution or verification of the nature of the problem. Are there traces of these greek Acts 10 verses 2 and 5 in the ukrainian presidential names - up to Zelensky? (See end of the article - which has not been updated in the analysis since it was written). The ukrainian creed is probably somewhere between russian and greek orthodoxy.
|
Acts 10 Verse 2 1. eusebes kai phoboumenos 2. ton theon sun panti toi oikoi autou 3. poion 4. eleemosunas pollas 5. toi laoi kai 6. deomenos 7. tou theou dia 8. pantos |
Acts 10 Verse 5 kai nun pempson andras eis Ioppen kai metapempsai Simona tina hos epikaleitai petros |
Ukrainian president = Viktor Yushchenko = Leonid Kravchuk = Leonid Kuchma = Viktor Yanukovych = Oleksandr Turchynov = Yulia Tymoshenko? = 2 x Leonid, 2 x Viktor = Petro Poroshenko |
I add the other two verse pairs (from the above scheme of elements 2 and 5) for further comparison with these ukrainian names:
|
Acts 10 Verse 25 1. hos de egeneto 2. tou eiselthein 3. ton Petron 4. sunantesas autoi 5. ho Kornelios 6. peson 7. epi tous podas 8. prosekunesen |
Acts 10 Verse 19 tou de Petrou dienthumoumenou peri tou horamatos eipen [autoi] to pneuma Idou andres treis zetountes se |
|
Acts 10 Verse 33 1. exautes oun epempsa pros se 2. su te kalos epoiesas 3. paragenomenos 4. nun oun pantas hemeis 5. enopion tou theou 6. paresmen akousai 7. panta ta prostetagmena soi 8. hupo tou kuriou |
Acts 10 Verse 46 ekousan gar auton lalounton glossais kai megalunonton ton theon tote apekrithe Petros |
This could suggest that Ukraine had attempted to find the way of goodness-driven solution to this crisis - and hence could have hoped for a more friendly attitude in the rest of the world towards Russia. When the crisis could not be avoided any longer, the name of Zelensky in this scheme (instead of Tymoshenko?) could have looked like a 'dirty trick' relative to the western ideas of a 'nazi madonna' ('tina hos' is norwegian for 'thawed by/at'). Hence the 'funny' Zelensky in the TV series? It is noticed that element 6 in verses 25-19 and 33-46 could explain the arrest and health problems of Yulia Tymoshenko - as if for creating just this 'dirty mythos' when applying the name of 'Zelensky'. Would this 'dirty trick' have meant that they had to bite the dust and accept the mythological conditions of NATO for getting to the needed muscle?
It is probably because the connection between debt and persecution has not been verified that it would have been difficult to just give european (or global) money to Russia - if this connection were verified on a scientifically valid basis, such a donation for goodness-driven purposes could have been defended in a sensible and rational way. A significant correlation between indexes (names, probably) of russian owners ('creditors') and corresponding indexes of persecuted russian nationals in Ukraine could have been used as sufficient reason for allocating money to Russia on the specific basis of considering it a compensation for the losses of ownership in Ukraine.
This newspiece could suggest that Europe may be thinking more 'competitively' than really goodness-driven (updated here, though). That is likely to be because standard modern economy is competitively orientated. It could also be that this also contributes to the greenhouse effect by the need for a competitive economy.
It must be understood that when the world to such a large extent supports Ukraine against Russia, it is probably these ukrainian attempts to approximate a goodness-driven economy in the presidential names that the world supports - rather than the origins of the crisis. 'Donations' ('shenka' spelt 'skjenka' is norwegian for 'donated') are reported to be a wide-spread phenomenon in Ukraine, but clearly oldfashioned corruption is not a solution to these problems.
The story in total could mean that the world is trying to steer towards a goodness-driven economy - but the 'dirty trick' seems to have been (phonologically) what led to the war - or maybe rather to have told that the war could not be avoided. Hence it is likely that the nazi mythology has to be dismantled for this new economy to function. It is the new computerized world which can verify whether persecutions and abuses derive from e.g. debt relations.
© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 22 march 2024