18 august 2020

18 august 2020

John Bjarne Grover

The time in Molde in the 1960's included some two-some walks with Grøver/'Mengele' in the rather flat (although a little up above the ocean level) district paradoxically called 'Skaret' (mountain pass, normally rather V-shaped, but the word associates with the idea of 'the cut', possibly also with 'hard crust surface of snow') outside town. On one such walk, Grøver/'Mengele' pointed with his (I think it was) righthand index finger towards the thumb palm ball on his left side, encircling it with the tip of his finger - telling that this is the favourite part ('del') for cannibals. This idea of 'cannibalism' could apply to the issue of christian communion and hence the evangelic-lutheran church in Venice (assuming that old schism of the anglican church with the catholic) where they have to te left of the altar a 'Salvator Mundi' by Tizian (my photo) with the thumb phenomenon. See also the ex nihilo 'portrait of the selbst' I made 'mitte März' this year, five months before 'ferragosto'. This Tizian phenomenon could have been combined with the graffiti theme (detail from the head of the female) of Dylan Thomas (see end of the article The coordinate system for the theme of 'five and country senses' relative to the the x-ray phenomenon for 'deal and thom-as' - as if I had agreed to any 'deal' by that walk. I had not! And neither had Thomas, probably - but socalled 'intelligence' could have discovered the close affinity between his poetry in 'A map of love' with this schimmel 'graffiti' that probably develops spontaneously like a 'man-on-wagon' and similar phenomena. Of course that does not mean that Thomas had to be an agent - it rather means that this is a level in the semiotics of the a human psyche which can take on the form of poetry by Thomas or schimmel 'graffiti' on a bathroom wall. But a dirty intrigue could have been constructed for trying to prove that Thomas had a 'deal' with the secret intelligence - who then allegedly had borrowed him a copy of their very secret photo of such a wall. Such childishness! It could have been something similar they had planned for me - trying to claim later that I had a 'deal' and had got the material from them. I have no 'deal', and I am not an agent.

See also in the end of the article The coordinate system the theme of a 'thom-as' on top of the head of the 'two-nibble rear' as it developed in the course of three weeks from the initial female character. It is possile that this is the background of 'Tony Blair' in England and hence a part of a planned future claim that I should have a 'deal' of some sort. The other half of british politics could then be spotted in the cartoon in The New Yorker of 8 february 1999 (12 years 2 months and 12+ days before Sebastian Kurz entered the government in Austria) - the woman down right under the 'co-white' hillary landscape picture on the wall could resemble Theresa May while the man could look more like Boris Johnson. But what is she doing? Why his perplexed look? From the above: "Grøver/'Mengele' pointed with his (I think it was) righthand index finger towards the thumb palm ball on his left side, encircling it with the tip of his finger". 'Walk on Skaret' compares via 'gå-skjære' ('walk-cut') with french 'gauchère' = lefthandedness - like my gynaecomasty? Theresa May and Boris Johnson are also mentioned in the article Some comments on the Zheng chapter of Shijing - in the beginning of the part called 'Politics'.

'Mountain pass' = 'mån-te pass' = 'he must to passport': My passport expired in april 2019 and had to be renewed in the embassy Rome - for biometrics. In 2009 I presented the application for new passport in the consulate in Venice but new routines required personal presence in Rome for biometrics. The Khashoggi case is of course probably something else than my shaggy-dog biometrics. I had from the hospital bed sent my manuscript electronically to LEV on 28 december 2018 and a few days later the pope had to find a new chief for the publisher. Then some days after that again (still in the hospital) I got on 9 january an email from a 'Simon Elliott Blake' who had borrowed a computer from somebody else wherefrom he sent me 80 files attached for review - an opinion request. I did not open any of the files but later returned a reply to the owner of the email account. The name backwards could resemble aspects of my name ('loopaper' if 'shoeshine negro') - and yesterday there were news on sputniknews.com that 'bridgish' MI6 agents have regained the James Bond licence they may have lost with the EU but seem to have got back could be with the brexit. I dont know how interesting the observation is that this sounds like the same name backwards. The joint effect of this could be another attempt to make it look as if I should have been an agent. 'James Bond' compares with 'Jond Bjames'. Soon after I had left the hospital in early february 2019 I had to travel down on trembling legs to the embassy in Rome for renewing the passport. The biometrics machine in the embassy in Rome on 7 february 2019 did not function well and we had to take photo, iris and fingerprints several times before it was okay. (A young american man had slipped in before me even if I was there on the minute of opening - but they had told me on the phone in advance that it was possible also outside the strict opening time). Khashoggi resembled perhaps my once (1971- or 1972-) piano teacher Trygve Madsen, a name which can mean (mental but not political) 'asylum'. If the story is me in the squeeze of the east-west power balance, or maybe rather the border to the Bermuda triangle, this passport application story could have added to the puzzling similarity of my disease with the addressee of the application for housing I had sent from Szolnok to Venice in late october 2018. (The application was to "Direzione Coesione Sociale, Cittá di Venezia, Servizi alla Persona e Benessere di Comunitá, Servizi per la Residenza" - the problems were burst urine channel due to retention which started 9-10 days before I sent the application, digestion problems, trombosis in left leg at hip joint, acute anemia). I am not an agent and have never been - but I am now well up from bed and can move around.

Added 21 august 2020:

Theresa May before she resigned talked frequently of 'triggering article fifty' in the sense of 'brexit', while Boris Johnson emerged as a proponent of 'hard brexit'. In the light of the cartoon in The New Yorker of 8 february 1999, one could see a certain link to the perplexed look of the 'Boris Johnson' similar down right of the mid image on the wall - showing two mountains with a 'pass' between them - cp. 'Skaret'. Now in the covid-19 pandemic times, it is likely that the interface between public and administration all over the world to a large extent is made up of plexiglass - which then is the name of the power that is created from the 'divide-and-conquer' of social distancing with the pandemic. Cp. also the circle that turns around on the computer internet screen when waiting for a video to open - as if people thereby are invited to join the excitation of a nipple.

The air is polluted with CO₂ and the carbon must be chiselled off ('Meissler' of Beirut?), otherwise the glaciers can melt and the ocean rise 6 meters. If I qua ubiquitous Grover = Carbon (?) is planned to be 'chiselled off', this could count as 'carbon' = 'negro'. If a 'trans' were chiselling like a toothbrush (or school dentist) on me in 1970-71, there could be two perversions (pedo + cannibalism/racism) meeting in the colon. Onto this there could be plans of a 'diagonal genocide', not brown but white, for reinforcing the double negation. Of course such 'nazi' plans would be only a socalled 'hilarious' version of the principles I suggested for finding a medication against covid-19 or viruses generally - or my 'fundamental theorem of linguistics' generally.

Plexiglass is made probably from oil. From 2 kg oil comes 1 kg plexiglass. If the world runs out of oil, there is no more plexiglass. But we need plexiglass.

The title of my blue PEB = 'POLAKK English Bloggi' could perhaps rewrite to 'på lakk in-gli-shpell oggi' which perhaps could be recognized in the name of 'Khashoggi'. But 'gammal achmad' my book is not - at least I am not a cannibalist and the inner poetic articulations of mine are not of that type.

I do not understand the WHO problem. If my recipe for a vaccine were used for making the vaccine, of course I must be credited in full name. My function 14 as distributional semantics could perhaps be called a sort of trivial commonplace semantic theory but that is only in the sense of a natural thinkable semantic theory - appr. something like 'all natural languages change in the course of time' (because meaning is updated by use). All or most linguists could claim that they have made that theory themselves. But my function 14 is much more than that: The solution via 'Stillhetens åndedrag' relative to doublewords in TEQ books 13-16 and the imprint of meaning on matter in the mid of poem 5 out of 64 reduced from 105 is far from anything self-evident - and my semantic theory of TEQ function 14 isnt anything self-evident either - in particular the phonological or poetic logic that can be shown to probably exist is potentially very groundbreaking indeed - much more than anything like 'onomatopoetics' or 'mama/papa' signification. This likewise can be called a 'general theory', that a logic of speech sounds could exist, and perhaps Plato was the first, as usual, but it is air and nonsense to claim that my theory is commonplace.

There is another example in my 1997 PhD dissertation ('A waist of time' in 'Vol.3') of what could look like an apparent 'commonplace theory' but by a closer look perhaps could be shown to be very groundbreaking indeed - perhaps even to the point of the basis of a major revolution in the interface between logic and linguistics. In my dissertation I briefly mention the conclusion that can be drawn from the discussion that 'a branching grammatical node is the same as a logical paradox'. Many grammarians and logicians who read it will be quick to leap to the conclusion that 'of course it is, I could have said the same' - but I have searched in vain for it on print. "That is because it is self-evident" say intrigue-makers. It is not self-evident! My TEQ took 11 years without a single day holiday - because a math that is valid for all numbers except, say, 27, 43 and 11168 is worthless - or will lend too much value or attention to these numbers on holiday. There is an enormous lot of work behind my function 14 - while the general identity of logical paradoxes and grammatical nodes is easy speculation - which is not the same as the data I present from the comparative historic study. If 'a branching grammatical node is the same as a logical paradox', that should be a substantial field of study in linguistics and logic - since it is possible to microscope a historic paradox.

Vol.3 page 270:
It is here that we see the interesting point of contact between logical paradoxes and grammatical theories. In fact, since the hierarchical structure provided the solution to the logical paradoxes in Russell's theory of types, it follows that the knowledge-potential embodied in the paradoxes is represented in the branching nodes of a tree structure. That is, in short: Grammatical categories (conceived of in this sense) represent logical antinomies. It is by this that we can see the immediate relevance of logical paradoxes for the study in the first part. I return to this interpretation towards the end of the study.

Vol.3 page 328-329:
The study has shown that there are reasons to compare the development of linguistic levels, logical paradoxes and information technology. The correlations have been sufficiently promising to suggest that logical paradoxes define the epistemological boundaries to the linguistic scope which is susceptible to formalization in the development of the information technology. Since this is also the scope which is subsumed under a branching node in a binary-branching syntactic tree, we can conclude: A grammatical node (or category) represents a logical paradox.
This idea seems generally either too self-evident to deserve mention (it is, for example, a natural consequence of the fact that Russell's theory of types leads to a syntactic hierarchy in extension from logical paradoxes), or it is mentioned only rather vaguely, such as in Curry (1961). As far as I know, the theory that grammatical categories are logical paradoxes has nevertheless not yet been explicitly formulated. In general, logic seems to have been too concerned with removing paradoxes instead of exploring their epistemological productivity.
The synchronic recognition of a grammatical node in a logical paradox, such as Russell's theory of types suggests, confirms also the present analysis of a parallelism in the development of logical paradoxes and (the formalized units of) grammatical levels. A converging of evolutionary and genetic epistemology (Kesselring 1994) is concerned much with the same.

Could be Curry was too vague, but I think I understood that he could have nourished similar ideas, sort of. (I cannot really find it again - the 1961 reference is probably not where I read it but it is the reference given in the dissertation).

There are some 23000 or so lines of 'inner poetic articulation' in the 16 books of my TEQ. These are probably of a kind that compares with 23000 differential equations that cannot be solved by computers - and that is the empirical basis for my theory of distributional semantics which applies as function 14 to my empirical evidence of how to imprint linguistic meaning into substantial material interpretation. In vol.4 I also discuss the example of how the electronic computer seemed to be temporarily 'hung' in strangely human semantics (instead of, as would be expected, producing symbolic nonsense by error on low electronic level) in just that function 14 which contains the doublewords from TEQ book 14 as part of the alignment in 'Stillhetens åndedrag'. That looks like a true logical paradox a la Cantor's diagonal proof (which is based on a logical negation of an adjective - like claiming that if the ocean is green or 'countable' and you drop a colour of red in it, then it is suddenly non-green = red or 'uncountable') - the strangely or 'paradoxically' human behaviour of the semantics of the 'hung' computer can perhaps be explained or at least compared with this 'diagonal' role of a doubleword from just book 14 in my TEQ as it applies to the lines of 'Stillhetens åndedrag'. There are 1344 lines in this book and there are 1345 doublewords in TEQ books 13-16, and these apply with much precision to each other in the alignment - but one of these 1345 doublewords were counted by paradoxically human semantics in a 'hung' computer and if that is adjusted for, it turns out to be just 1344 doublewords in TEQ books 13-16 relative to the 1344 lines of 'Stillhetens åndedrag'. That is not self-evident or commonplace! It is this higher level of a new logical paradox (and hence a potential higher level of grammatical category) that is the basis for the theory of a medication against virus that I have suggested.

Why just 1344 doublewords in TEQ books 13-16? That is contained in the results of the appr 23000 'differential equations' (assumed to be unsolvable by computer) in the work - and it can form the basis for a theory of grammar or knowledge generally on the border to the new metaphysical knowledge-space in the form of my 'fundamental theorem of linguistics' (telling that 2 and only 2 items can be recognized as 'the same' across different [metaphysical] realities).

One such paradox/category is seen in 'Stillhetens åndedrag' in the alignment against Luigi Nono's string quartet at the 'calibration' point of poem 50 with the wrapover in the packing from 105 to 64 poems: This seems to correspond to the hieroglyph 'tether' and the last photo from the Danube island onto which the wrapover line (of poem 50) seems possibly to apply:

Doublewords to this is 'file, fire, five' ('fire' is norwegian for 'four'). The calibration and 'tether' has a counterpoint also in the line of poem 23 for the second computer glitsch: 'Den ene veien, den andre og' ('the one way, the other as well'). Next to Danube island photo 23 is photo 22 which seems susceptible to the first computer glitsch in poem 47: 'Glemt på åker og parkeringsplass' = 'forgotten on field and parking lot'. The second computer glitsch (of poem 23) is in the form of the doubleword 'zum' (for 'culture') that had leapt from doubleword to poem 37 where the line is 'som åpner seg mot et hulrom i den' = 'which opens against/towards a hollow space in it', like a parking lot contains a hollow-spaced car. This hollow space is seen in photo 22. Photo 21 shows apparently a cult scene with a sickle and hammer on the ground, a la the KUA sign over the schimmel graffiti - also annotated - the combination apparently significant of the Bermuda triangle.

My younger official sister Tone Helene Grøver has been associated in mythos with the murder of Indira Gandhi. She once told me that she worked in a ministry in Oslo with checking imported toys (for avoiding import of dangerous child toys) - I even went to the ministry and she was there. It is probably essential for an assassin preparing for the job to check the 'toy' thoroughly. The man who resembled the british intelligence chief met me on probably the same place and bridge as where I had met the person who resembled Mido[r]i Goto who recorded the music for TEQ book 16 (alignment in vol.3). Is it the teddy Mumle seen in photo 19 along with the same person as in photo 18? Does it mean 'go to' Mumle, asking for support or borrowing of a manuscript? I hope the doubleword 'fire' was not the background of the bomb in Beirut recently, starting the series from the end. I once was out to a cafe with a woman - she bought a glass of peanuts and put it on the table between us (pingpong?) and I took it for granted that it was to both of us: If this is photo 18 = 'Beijut' = 'ba ikke ut' = 'did not ask for a date', the photo 19 could mean 'Beiring' in the sense of 'ba i ring' = 'invited for a ring / boxing match' (as in photo 19). A match with Mumle - the teddy (= 'bamse')? (What a life - a few peanuts decades ago seem to lead to a near demolision of Beirut?). It is not the right use of my work (while I have not even a suitable place to live and work in these coronavirus times). My work seems to have potentially large value for the development of the new science on the border to metaphysics - and should not be used for terrorist policy.

Unfortunately my PhD was apparently used as 'loopaper' for Gro Harlem Brundtland - hence the strange problems of WHO these days. It was rejected by a committee in a letter of late july 1998. While I was writing the appeal in august 1998, the US embassies in Dar-es-Salaam and Nairobi as well as the peace conference in Omagh were bombed: That makes for 'rejected on a political basis' - as if that terror should have been the format of my appeal - that makes my dissertation look like 'loopaper' for swinging Brundtland up in 'power'. (Similar strategies could want a genocide since it suppresses one part of the global society while swinging the other part up). My name as 'loopaper' (the 'negro' of 'john bjarne grover' as 'shoeshine') suggests racism against 'shoeshine-coloured' people. Soon the oil is used - and how do we make the needed plexiglass then?

Double negation of perversities plus a diagonal genocide to hold it in place is the primitive version of what my theory suggests as a formal symbolic solution for finding a medication against viruses generally. Again, if a medication against 'any virus infection' can be found, there is not much left of the power by biological weapons - and those who want to swing themselves up in power by considering others as 'loopaper' do probably not like that idea.

Clearly the 'loopaper' function of my dissertation while Brundtland was lifted to chief of WHO could appear as alarming in recent times. The 3-strong committee who rejected the dissertation contained also Jens Erik Fenstad who was known to have worked with the interface between mathematics and language - but seems to have ignored the value of my observation of the relation between logical paradoxes and linguistic categories: The dissertation was rejected because they had found some lines in the 600-page dissertation which they disagreed with and therefore they rejected it since 'all parts of the dissertation must be on a high international level'. Fenstad was appointed to a high-level board in the international UNESCO not long after the rejection of my work. I hope that not all parts of my dissertation have been [ab]used on the 'high international level' of e.g. UNESCO.

'Jens Erik[e] Fenstad' means 'you wont see Fe-nstad again' - cp. my acute anemia of 2018. The US embassies were bombed while I was writing the appeal to the rejected application for PhD degree.

If my theoretic account of virus multiplication was used for constructing the urgent vaccines against covid-19, the Beirut bomb could have been for couping this discovery (cp. also the 'Pasteur Street' near the bomb). I have not studied the details but guess that it could be about a chain from e.g. Beirut to Beijing - via Karachi, Let Kar etc - which even could be in imitation of the logic in my Danube island photos - such as these can be recognized in the chinese film from the 1960's. (Even used for the US election - Bermuda Mumle occurring in the role of my work? That would not be appropriate).

If paradoxes from my theoretic work can be used for explaining the series of thresholded photos 1-23, that is no minor matter - and to use it for couping the work would be too bad. I postulated in 'A waist of time' that the results from parts 1 (submorphemic signification), 2 (paradoxes = gramm categories), 3 and 4 could be used for postulating the model of the human linguistic competence in part 5 - but the exact form of it could not be done without thorough studies in poetic logic. That is what I have been doing since then (december 1997) - that is to have a good reason for the poetry.

Maybe most of the titbits of my work are already eaten by political intrigue - but to call for a circular excitation in the world attention to the leftside nipple of 'Boris Johnson' (on the cartoon) in 'hung' computer videos instead of a rational understanding of my work - if that is the basis for this - is not the right way.

Clearly if 'hard brexit' included the pandemic 'covid-19', one understands why one tries to avoid world attention to the leftside logic of 'Boris Johnson' - while the global curve of covid-19 goes up while I reside in Zinckgasse ('bor i sjansen' - it is hard to find any good alternative in Europe for me with my economy and special conditions) and it seems to go down as soon as I travel out of Austria.

About the role of the 'perplexed' glass, see also the record 'Purple rain' by the artist 'Prince', released by Warner Bros 128 days before the murder of Indira Gandhi. "U - I would die 4 U, darling if U want me 2". 'When doves cry' = 'where domes cry'?

I notice also the rock music group 'Deep Purple'. An early record was called 'The book of Taliesyn': 'Dårli[g] syn' is norwegian for 'bad-sighted' (needing spectacles). A track is called 'Wring that neck' ('hard brexit'?), followed by 'Kentucky Woman' and 'Exposition', another 'River deep, mountain high'.

Were even The Beatles this 'Beasley' cartoon? I notice 'Rubber soul' and 'Revolver' as possibly about this perplexed look with the circulation. 'Please please me' = 'pleased to meet you, Beasley'?

My computer or workspace generally is not 'commonplace' and it is not permitted to tap my work and send it around like 'loopaper' for strengthening own power by dirty methods. WHO and UNESCO should not accept that sort of methods.

Sources:

Curry, H. (1961): Some logical aspects of grammatical structure. In: Jakobson, R.(ed.): Structure of language and its mathematical aspects. Proc.12th Sympos.in Appl.Math. Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, pp.55-68. (This is the source I have given in my book but maybe not to the quote in the text).

Kesselring, T. (1994): A comparison between evolutionary and genetic epistemology or: Jean Piaget's contribution to a post-Darwinian epistemology. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 25:293-325.