Chapter 7: The original version
John Bjarne Grover
Here is the original chapter 7 to the ABC of june 2010, some of which is retained in the new version of the book, but there are some elements which could deserve to remain on the web for yet some time, for which reason I keep them here for some time still.
The book has been in chapters 1-5 on main themes which could be associated with my own private upbringing in the Gröver/'Mengele' family which counted 5 members - could be even in the order of age of the members. I don't know if chapter 5 corresponds to a role assigned to Tone Gröver, but I anyhow notice the characteristic categorial swap of 2 and 5 which can be spotted in the 'keys to heaven': It could then be about the lift from Paris to London, or it could be about Tone Gröver's role in british politics.
Lenin and Mao and the 'keys to heaven' of Acts 10
If Lenin arranged the attempt on his life in 1918 by Fanny Jefimovitsch Kaplan (outside the Michelson factories, could be for the concept that 'there is not enough cosmic harmony for communism yet' - and the basis for this is Michelson & Morley's = 'Michelson & Motherly's experiment) for telling about the Modern Language Review as the diachronic dimension of the Klipra connection, there is the hypothesis that he died or pulked in 1924 for telling about the synchronic dimension of the same connection - the 'keys to heaven' of Acts 10 of Downing Street 10. I have probably not found the solution to that but maybe it exists. The most natural explanation is of course that Lenin died for other reasons than for telling things - he could of course have been murdered and this idea of 'telling things' was later constructed by his murderers - but this explanatory framework deserves some attention. There are 1970 days from Kaplan's attempt to his death on 21 jan 1924, and Celan and Sachs (cp. 'Michelson and Morley') died in 1970. 1 relates to 21 (the date of his death) in the first quarter of the 16-summary scheme of the 'keys to heaven' and 19 to 7 in the second such as 10 to 30 (for the 0 in the 19-7-0) in the third and 28 to 16 in the fourth. Verse 28 could be the explanation how it could come about that Lenin let Quisling and Devold in to his datcha in Gorki, and then verse 16 tells that she shot him three times before the two travelled back again to Paris. I have not found the 'three times' in the official data on his death on 21 january - but he suffered three strokes before he died - on 26/5, 16/12, 9/3: I don't think I have solved this but it could be the reason for the birthday 25/11 of Vibeke Gröver in 1955. Hence if I am born 'po orets mittohat' = 'on the mid hat of the year' = 'Modern Language Review' = the diachronic dimension, Vibeke Gröver is born on the synchronic dimension relative to Lenin's death - and the 'reason' for Tone Gröver's birthday is discussed in chapter 3. That reason is rooted in the death of king Haakon VII who seems to have been the name of Stalin as VI-stalin, for king Haakon I.
But it may be that if Lenin's three strokes refer to this scheme, it relates to the two columns of the FFT flowgraph only and the natural question arises "where is the third column?" That is the column of weighting factors in the FFT algorithm - the semantic element which could be seen as the poetic logic if the flowgraph is the administrative. Could be, of course, that there is another reason for Vibeke Gröver's birthday and this could even have been known to Lenin and hence his question was this 'third column lacking'. If he took his name Lenin in 1900 for the sake of 'Leonie Sachs', it tells that the russian revolution is about the poetic revolution which should have developed from about 1850 if the british 'administrative' revolution had not taken its place. If the phenomenon of 'norwegian semantics' is of any relevance, it could relate to this 'third column'. Cp. 'Uri Geller' as 'Ure Soppstöd' as a comment to the norwegian administrative faith in 'the power of names'.
It can be, therefore, that Lenin died by his own hand in 1924 in order to rescue the revolution. But then he would have been the very Klipra connection in the mythology - which is not likely. (Or, if that was his reason, for example in order to get the problem under the revolution's authority, it could be tragic today if people of 2010 believe that we are in the midst of Lenin's revolution when we are in the Klipra connection - which would be very tragic for his own revolution). It is therefore possible that Lenin had appointed with Quisling that he should bring Laura Devold with him to Gorki to shoot him there, three times through the heart. This seems possibly to be the 'british' interpretation. Can we believe it? We can not? The last foreign politician Mao met was Bhutto from Pakistan - three months before his death in the autumn 1976 - which arguably sounds as if he himself had invited Vibeke Gröver to come and give him the last injection. I would, though, suppose that these are explanations provided by administrations who could be in need of such an explanatory framework. For example, one could fancy that the coalition government in England of 2010 is composed of 2 leaders for the columns 1 and 2 plus a third (Hague), who is supposed to be the only interesting authority, a poetic sort of variant, for a third column. This could also allow for some unacceptable policy for the simple reason of showing that 1 and 2 are not right but the third is. Accept of this could also lead to some accept of the idea that Lenin did it himself - for the sake of the Klipra connection.
It could be (as seen from MLR, although I have little other evidence or reason for the idea) that I was given a 'third eye' under anaesthesia in the autumn 1975 - a circular mutilation on my frontal lobe by laser imitating the turning of a key in a cylinder - could be for this concept of the 'third column' as Lenin's recommended answer to the political halt of communism, and as the correlate in Mao's death to Nansen, Gorvin and Frick in Moscow one year before Lenin's death. Lazer Ran published a book about Vilnius (and Martin Weiss) in 1974. He lived close to Ilse Blumenthal-Weiss in New York. My career as a disability pensioner (with rejected book submissions) since 2002 could find its rooting in the idea of 'warc riminal' which seems to be the essential contents of the documents left after Weiss in Vilnius. Two classmates of mine in high school from 1973 onwards had names which could be telling of this 'third column' of the 'warc riminal'. The political program in a 'third eye' mutilation could be the idea that jewish genetics is excrements. MLR July 1975 could tell of such a 'third eye' - and one speculates if an octogon 'circle' of married nurses could have had a sex party on my unconscious condition - for a 'brow har[l]em grundtlan' ('grundt-lan[d]' = 'laid him aground', 'shallow land') - an unrealistic idea which, though, would have been about the connection between the Octogon project and this 'third eye' column of Lenin. If the operation on my tonsils in the autumn 1975 were the correlate for Mao to Fridthjof Nansen in Moscow in january 1923, one year before the death of Lenin, one can find even a correlate to the operation on Krupskaja against 'Basedow' in 1913 when they lived in Poronim near Zakopane. But this 'Basedow' could even (guesswork, though) be the origin of 'Al Qaida' = 'the Base': A 'Fridge of Nansen' = 'Fringe of Tonsil' = 'Based-ow Shansi'. The earthquake of Shansi in China in 1556 is the most disastrous quake in known history - it claimed around 800.000 lives, same as Verdun, Treblinka and Rwanda - while the second most disasterous quake in known history was the one in Tangshan on 27 July 1976, around the time of the death of Mao. According to Chuang/Halliday, Mao met his navy chief in 1975 one year before his death (around the time of my hypothetical 'third eye', that could be) and showed him a little finger and said: 'Our navy is only like this'.
The great earthquake of Tangshan on 27 July 1976 - something between 250 and 600 thousand people died - could have been about those birth tongs on Celan's first child Francois, the brutality of the murder of communism, that could mean - which thereby means the third eye on me in the autumn 1975 after MLR july 1975 as a responsibility claim on the death of Mao - a 'brow' in a harem of nurses who laid him to the ground under anaesthesia. This 'bro' = 'bridge' could be the later role of 'Pawel Biedgo' of Vilnius = 'bridge-go' of Venice between Pedrocchi and Barnaba, for the 3-2-1 attempt on the 'pawel', the polish pope, in 1981. I crossed this bridge one day in 2008 or 2009 when it occurred to me that it was former CIA chief John MacLaughlin who sat there on the brink of the church, looking at the bridge. The tourist who looked like him was having lunch with a boy.
Why had I moved down from Vienna (via Athens) to Venice - where it seemed that the only relevant place I could find was in Pedrocchi? Could be it was the murder of Bhutto's daughter Benazir Bhutto in late 2007 which was a part of the reason why I understood that I had to move on. I first tried to get off the trap by going to Athens, but a few days after my arrival the BA38 from Beijing emergency landed on Heathrow while Gordon Brown was waiting for takeoff to Beijing in a nearby building. It felt like a lasso was thrown around me legs. One could think that Bhutto was murdered and BA38 was crashed for making me move to Venice.
If Lenin's three strokes select Vibeke Gröver's birthday in 1955, Mao's three strokes (11.5, 26.6 and 2.9, according to Spence: 'Mao', 1999/2003) could select Caroline Kennedy's birthday 27.11 on reverse - and between these there is the 26.11 of 2015. Leif Stene Johansen died on 24.II.2002. This means that dates of the three strokes of Lenin and Mao can have been used for computing this 26 nov 2015 for couping the joint effect of the two revolutions - for a joint Klipra and Jar connections. This construction can of course be a late variant. In 2005 I got a PO Box in Vienna - I first got #23, same as my house number, and then it was changed to #35.
The conclusion to the theme of Lenin and Mao and the 'keys to heaven' seems to be that it is what the 1-2-3 is about: 1-2-3 are the three column in the 16-class analysis of 'keys to heaven', the two first of which apply to the 'stroke structure' of Lenin and Mao - which must count as examples of administrative logic, while the third column applies to the poetic logic which it may be that England plans to present itself with while the rest of the continent is struggling with implementing columns 1 and 2 as well as they can. If such a plan succeeds, it could come to resemble the situation in the 1930's up to 1945. But of course the rest of the continent should not be as naive as that.
I guess that this is the essence of the 1-2-3 - and hence the structure over the pope in 1981, Manhattan 2001 - and a hypothetical attack on Italy (Venice?) in e.g. 2015 or thereabout. If such should happen, it could be for the purpose of driving the continent into columns 1 and 2 and be 'wrong' there while England remains in column 3 - and appears as 'right' there.
The british problem
The conclusion to this study is that the Klipra and Jar connections seem to be the most important political landmarks in the 20th century - while they are so far kept completely off any public attention. Which means that the public has not got a chance to understand anything of what goes on in international politics. Most alarmingly, if the Klipra connection and WWI and WWII constituted the lefthand context of a chomskyan 'context-free phrase structure' and the righthand connection is planned to be a Jar connection with WWIII and WWIV, then it is of utmost importance that the public get the chance to understand it in order to prevent further progress of the madness. Politicians think largescaled - 'for wrapping 2000 around 1000 to coincide with Christ we much wrap Italy around Paris to coincide with Norway, and for this we need to carpet-bomb Italy on a 23 scheme' - could be quite simply because Adorno's wife was called 'Karplus' - while other people think of their lives as something precious and this value they assign to themselves and to others is the basis for a healthy society and culture. There won't be much valuable made in arts and science if people are supposed to accept another 'connection' madness with world wars and genocides in order to make the scrabble fit the plans in London. The Rwanda genocide was probably a part of this scheme - 800.000 tutsies probably for the sake of being the same number of victims as in Shansi in 1556, at Verdun and Treblinka. And the ultimate purpose of it could be to point to the church of San Trovaso in Venice where one Tintoretto is from around 1556 and Michele Giambono's 'San Crysogono a cavallo' is from 1444 - the year of Gutenberg's first bible - and the trotting knight on the animate and pensive horse resembles Ragna Eidsvig! On his shield there is, in the middle, the three letters VAS or even VA8 - cp. Keith Vaz in Blair's government. The 800.000 'tutsies' could have died in the genocide even for the sake of the alternative name of 'San Trovaso' which is 'San Gervasio & San Protasio' - and Gröver/'Mengele' had a horse-size gebisso installed a couple of years before he died. There is a small latin numeral incised on a pillar there - it tells that 'La capella del Santissimo Sacramento' was consecrated in 1556 = MDLVI, the year of the earthquake in Shansi. It is 'Modern Humanities Research Association' (MHRA) who publishes 'Modern Language Reivew' (MLR). It should be an international concern to have such publications stopped to the extent that they publish responsibility claims for terror and fraud. In addition to these data on Rwanda, one can add that the mid point between Shansi and Gutenberg's first bible was 1500 with the papal Treaty of Tordesillas which divided the world in two halves - with the division line running approximately through the Falklands Islands - where England had their 'flagellant war' in 1982. Which means that the genocide in Rwanda even could have served to contribute to a british coup in France - including the AIDSHIV lift from Paris to London. It was Argentine who attacked and Thatcher's government decided on defending the islands, which means that it was 'flagellant' only if british administration had asked for the argentinian attack. British Labour or their supporters could have asked for it, of course - and the name of the islands made it 'flagellant'. Thatcher's name seems to apply to the little stretch from San Pantalon to Campo Santa Margherita in Venice - just a few metres up from San Trovaso. The spanish name 'Islas Malvinas' on the islands could even suggest a reference to 'mal-Vienna' = 'mal-positioned Vienna' = 'Venice' islands.
However, even if one can construct socalled political 'reasons' for such genocides, or for such apparently hilarious reasons as the '23' in the Gulf 1980-1990, with 1,5 million dead, it is likely that all such political ideas are really not much more than pretexts for the british wellness program that seems to depend on 'genocide abroad' on basis of their anglican faith since Henry VIII made the state church of England. If there are no genocides at all, it may be that the britons will feel that they run dry under a pale and indifferent sky where not much happens and nobody cares about them. To claim rights to genocide under the clause of humans rights to freedom of faith is probably not legitimate in this case, though. If they do not feel for converting to catholicism instead of having to carry the burden of yet another two world wars, there is of course the possibility open that they quite simply can agree to the dogma of transubstantiation on some format: They could e.g. include a clause in their mass saying that they believe in the transubstantiation of the host for the sake of their fellow beings. For the love of their brothers and sisters abroad - who do believe in this dogma - and why should they be wrong? So many million people cannot be wrong all of them. A little ketchup doesn't matter, but too much blood-shed can harm the international community.
This problem of british administration - they seem to suffer from bad conscience and know it well, and do perhaps not feel comfortable about the future meeting with St.Peter - can be seen in the apparent british attitude of invoking the weak parts of other nationalities which could mean that 'they are not better themselves'. The holocaust could have been such a fundamental humiliation of german culture - for the same idea that 'why should the britons give up their spiritualism when the germans can let themselves be cheated into such horrors?'. The british reply to accusations on their spiritualism could be that it serves to tell other cultures about their own weaknesses.
The anglo-saxon-jutes
The other important aspect of the story is found in the central importance of the 'anglo-saxon' dimension in terms of Ancel-Sachs and me (who could be the 'Jute' aspect of the origin of the britons) can be spotted from the fact that Olof Palme was chief of state in Sweden where Sachs lived after the war - like the two palms of a crucified - when she was suffering and eventually died, and Charles de Gaulle was chief of state in France where Celan lived during the period of 'die Goll-Affäre'. And Golda Meir in Israel since the foundation of the state, and so forth. Al Gore was Clinton's vice president - could be a variant of my childhood fantasy friend Gori as vice president to Clinton in the White House. And Gro Harlem Brundtland was chief of Norway when I lived there - 'grow hard-limb B-round-land' could suggest a fourfold 'swastika' B directed east-south-west-north for a total Octogon of the 'hardlimd' - and this career was preceded and prepared with her father Gudmund Harlem and his 10 years in the government 1955-65 along with the Eisenhower doctrine - which makes sense of the assumption that the Eisenhower doctrine serves to encode the names of the females in the Octogon and that the names of CIA chiefs from at least 1977 onwards encode the name of Rekustad farm next to Simon Walther Hauge - for the concept of the free will in my participation in the Octogon project. Without free will there would be not much politics therein - and this free choice of mine seems to have been prepared throughout my upbringing with various methods of threats and abuse, possibly including poisoning, torture, rape and other factors. There is of course not so much left of the free will after such a story, but I could not prove that there was poison in the food when Ragna Gröver set off for a stay-over in Oslo or thereabout. These three state chief examples - de Gaulle, Palme, Harlem Brundtland - for the three members of the family representing the jewish-genetic diaspora - thereby also encode the concept of the 'holy troika' which could be contained in the russian 'peres-troika' (adding Golda Meir).
It is even possible that modern international politics since at least WWII has been almost nothing but this drama of the jewish-genetic diaspora in this little genetic family in contrast to the administrative family of the Gröver/'Mengele' type - the drama incorporated into the tragic holocaust with its death camps and all that - and that states like Sweden and France had no other option than these two chiefs of state. De Gaulle revolted by being lax on the secrecy on Hitler and France was out of NATO for a while - a piece of history which tells, though, that membership in NATO does not always guarantee the protection from the alliance. It is of course of utmost importance that this mythomaniac madness of secrecy be brought to an end and that the world can get a complete account of what has been going on. I am particularly convinced that the people of England do not support a policy of state terrorism organized from Downing Street 10. Could it be the british government has as little choice as the swedish and french governments? Then one has come down to the explanatory framework of helplessness in politics - which indeed seems to be a parametre which could deserve some scientific attention. And then it is time that the world wakes up from its state of psychosis and tries to recover to the mental health it needs for entering a new millenium. The present story seems to be a tragic story of complete mythomania - as if the world sees it as its task to approximate a scenario of ancient greek and hebrew myths and play the roles assigned to them from these old knowledge formats which once served to make sense out of the alphabet as an information technology.
Does this mean that Palme, de Gaulle, Brundtland were or had to be agents for England? It is said about general de Gaulle that he was given two cheap victories by the Germans during the war - at Montcornet and Abbeville - which strongly fuelled his career to the position of chief of state after the war. It is of course possible that Claire and Ivan Goll were primary (for the plans on Celan from about 1949) and that Charles de Gaulle was secondary - and that he was brought to power by such means as this story from the war. Likewise, a state like Sweden would not have been expected to 'crucify' Nelly Sachs at the end of the sixties - and the name of Olof Palme could have been the way the state told that this was not their idea. But then somebody should come out with the reason - so that one does not have to repeat the mistakes. Palme was probably assassinated in 1986, and de Gaulle probably in 1970 - and it is of course possible that these were murdered for the sake of turning the roles if they were not agents - which could have meant a coup in France in 1970.
A peculiar aspect of this phenomenon is what I discovered in 2010 after I had bought a practical camping gear with knife, fork, spoon, bottle and can opener on one single handle - and some days later it dawned to me that I had bought a war criminal. This joke seems to be funny in many languages and it seems that many of the major war criminals have names that conspire on this tool. (Could be the sardine box with its key is an alternative - for example for Heinrich Himmler). It even seems that the documents left after Martin Weiss, the chief of the executions at Paneriu in Vilnius, the 'temple' of the philosophy of telepathic 'fish fingers', are based on this concept of 'warc riminal', in particular the document with a long vertical list of famous actresses plus the single name Grace Moor on top of the next column, and if one believes that the tool is a 'cruci-fix-ion' and that most people will be inclined to believe that the joke is their own, the tool could contain the secret of the suffering and death of Sachs, of 'die Goll-Affäre' of Celan and of the '8 actresses and even Moor' of my own Octogon. 'Ivan Goll' could have his name from 'I-warc-oll' = 'warc kolli' and his wife 'Claire Goll' as the 'clerk' who handles the 'kolli' on the luggage shelf could represent the list of actresses. The point with this construction could probably have been to make a big thing out of the ideas in the mind of the chief of the execution site at Paneriu in Vilnius. There is even a document mentioning three names - Kazakeviciute, Krymas Aloysas/Aboysas, and Romanis - which seem to be this warc riminal / war criminal, and which seem to contain the information needed to assume that the two nuclear bombs on Japan in 1945 were known to Weiss even in May 1944. This means that the two bombs could be a part of the driving motor for the 'fish finger' symbolism of Paneriu. If I am a disability pensioner whose computer is tapped and whose book submissions are held long before rejected, it can be that I share this 'warc riminal' with others in the construction. One can add that the name of Gro Harlem Brundtland could mean an 'octogon' in the same sense as there could be 8 tools around the handle of the practical camping gear. Ol-of Palme likewise - for the tool in the palm. But it seems that 'Charles de Gaulle' does not easily read out of the tool. It could be that a box of sardines or brisling (with the characteristic key) is an alternative symbol. Current iranian president 'Ahmadinejad' has a name suggestive of such symbolism, which could be telling of the idea that the tool is an important secret for US administration,
The swastika chin and the telescopes: genetic-poetic and administrative logic
The european swastika around Paris seems to be a central trait in this story. It can be that it means the program of administration being stronger than genetics. I recall Gröver/'Mengele' watching TV and pointing out a news presenter with a cleft chin - the cleft was vertical and not horizontal. My own chin has some horizontal cleft resembling Rilke's, and it is rather withdrawn since probably around 1970, and I have speculated if the shape-of-chin were a part of the eugenetics studies of Mengele - the art of making chins look like this or that with administrative and other means. There are some interesting 'calendarial telescopes' in this story: There is a perfect 37 telescope (37 years, 37 months, 37 weeks, 37 days) from Rilke's birth on 4 december 1875 to 'Jensen Gröver's birth on 27 October 1916, and a perfect 37 telescope from this date to the publication date of the Eisenhower doctrine on 4-5 january 1957. This publication date of the doctrine was also 1223 hours, days, weeks, months after the birth of king Albert of Saxony (cp. 'Ancel-Sachs', the 'anglo-saxons'). There is also a 185 telescope - without years and months - from Celan's birth to this Jensen Gröver birth in 1916 - and this is probably the reason for the 185 telescope on aspects of my life - up to the detention in the psychiatric hospital in 1999 with 185 back to the constitution year 1814 of Norway with the Dovre/Dover slogan attaching it to the border of England. This means that the Eisenhower doctrine could be about these eugenetic or physiognomic aspects of the story. My guess is that it could be telling of my physiognomic relation to Rilke (and Albert) in terms of chin - for the idea that such administrative calendarial logic is stronger than genetics. I suppose that could have been what Gröver/'Mengele' meant in his TV chair in Volda. This could explain my horizontal 'cleft' of chin. In addition, it can be noticed that Celan's chin resembles Gröver/'Mengele's - something which perhaps could have added to the stress of 'die Goll Affäre' wherein he 'put it on the tongue'. There is this idea which takes shape in the mind - although I have not much reason for it - that both Sachs and Celan could have been made for the roles in this mythological theatre and hence have got their physiognomic traits selected for it. If one finds that Sachs is 'horizontal' and Celan 'vertical' in facial outlines, one could even speculate if this story is the basis for Hitler's swastika - the 'Hakenkreuz' - with me as the 'jute' counterhooks on this archetypal 'anglo-saxon' symbol. I have never heard any such theories, but the whole story revolves around this theme of administration vs. genetics. The border line in the Barents Sea ('Barentshavet') between Norway and Russia - cp. the Dover border lines to England of 1814 - was negotiated from 1970 to 27 April 2010.
In the introduction to this book, I mentioned some dates of births and deaths which carry some evidence of major importance for the possibility of assigning reality to the story told in the book. Clearly if the whole story was planned well in advance, the birthday of Jensen/Gröver in 1916 - and of Celan in 1920, both of them apparently represented in advance in MLR - would have been correlated with Rilke's birthday for a perfect 37 telescope relative to the 1957 publication of the Eisenhower doctrine on a day which has a telescope to Albert of Saxony - whose chin resembles Rilke's somewhat. My own birth was not on this publication date in early january but in the middle of the 1957 year - partly for the telescope to Nathan Milstein, partly for the 'b-orets mittohat' = 'on the mid hat [or mid day] of the year' of the hebrew commandment against 'Idol Fitler'. Milstein would probably not have been born to the date and role but could have been selected later - perhaps not the least due to his characteristic chin resembling Rilke's, Albert's - and mine. I would say that I share also some eyebrow-eye traits with Milstein - which are interesting in light of the apparent fact that I am not in a genetic - but in an administrative - relation to him. 'Labråten 508' could not have existed but the number 58 would do, could be with some administration on the zero. I notice also the apparent role of the Demuses relative to Celan. MLR april 1957 for my birth seems to have described the branching structure of two halves, somewhat like a 'walking ad for nazism', could be for a Klipra and Jar connections and with a 'chomskyan' node in the middle. This seems to be the program of proving that administrative logic is stronger than genetic or poetic and that this is the new information technology - and, even more, that this is the reality of the british anglican state church.
Is there any real value in such calendarial telescopes? They count astronomical revolutions - of the earth around itself, the moon around the earth and the earth around the sun. If all such revolutions converge on a single shared numeral, such as 37, then one could fancy that the philosophy would be about competing with ideas of 'cosmic harmony' such as the law of Moses or medieval mystics. Perhaps the nazis would say that the old testament of the Bible is 'administrative' in this sense of it and the new testament is 'genetic', while normally the genetic aspect is associated with the jewish. The week is, though, not an astronomic revolution but one fourth of a lunar month: Then it means the typical 'flowgraph' of neural activation in the brain - an impulse goes from one cortical column to another, from there to a third, from there to a fourth in a square - and from there either back to the first or on to a new - and this is the basis for the permutations in the 'keys to heaven'. This is the political meaning of the numeral 23 in the Gulf war and in Tone Gröver's calendarial telescope. It is also the theme of the poetic proof that Sachs and Celan are my parents - along with the theme of 'die Goll-Affäre'. Seen from the viewpoint of this proof - is Celan's 'Späte Gedichtsammlung' an outright plagiarism of Sachs' 'Glühene Rätsel I' or is it a groundbreaking original work? This is a matter of administrative vs. poetic logic. One could say that the administrative philosophy is based on the interface between human cognition and cosmic harmonies as perceived from the earth. Some philosophers will perhaps claim that this is what a natural number is. Well, I don't know. My own book #15 ('Gentlemen') in my 'The Endmorgan Quartet' is a variant on the same universal-poetic scheme as Sachs' and Celan's two parallel works - and I am reasonably convinced that one can find a connection from my own book 14 to book 15 (in which case it is proven that 'plagiarism' is not the relevant term). For example, Sachs' poem #1 ('Diese Nacht') = Celan's poem #16 ('Kreuzkobolde') = my poem #47 ('Ketchup') - in a triad of poems which seem to encircle precisely the british problem of transubstantiation.
Sachs - Glühende Rätsel I #1
Diese Nacht,
ging ich eine dunkle Nebenstraße
um die Ecke
Da legte sich mein Schatten
in meinem Arm
Dieses ermüdete Kleidungsstück
wollte getragen werden
und die Farbe Nichts sprach mich an:
Du bist jenseits!
Celan - Späte Gedichtsammlung #16
Kreuzkobolde, ver-
spielt,
zwischen dem Nagelhundert.
Eine muntere Sargträne schleift
am bärenstimmigen
Lungen-Alraun.
My poem - Gentlemen #47
Ketchup
The clutch - that is always me:
Two goes in the south,
ten [...] who made an effort have stepped down.
This tells that the three works are about those poetic complexes of inner articulation (including an inner articulation of history) which have a religious interpretation in terms of the catholic dogma of transubstatiation. My poem could even suggest that an aspect of the british transubstantition problem is tentatively solved by way of 'norwegian semantics' - hence the story since 1814 - and Israel 1948 with the ancient hebrew (here from Talmud Erubin) which they could try and coup via the european swastika by way of Italy. The three works are comparable in what I call 'the small rainbow', compared with the 'big rainbow' in my book #14. The three poems cited here should prove that the element of 'plagiarism' or 'copying' is not interesting as far as Celan's (or Sachs' or mine) book is concerned. (It is also his reply to 'die Goll-Affäre'). Then it rather means that the interests as far as the poetic universals are concerned are shared among the three poets - possibly on a genetic basis.
It is of course possible that genetics is not the only source of physiognomy. It is interesting, in light of the apparently strong systematic importance assigned to the numeral 508, which defines the telescope for the interval from Nathan Milstein's and my births, including the formula 'weak in Jahrs, weaks in Urs', that in fact I do resemble Milstein somewhat, at least of facial look - but certainly not as far as his violin talent is concerned. The idea that such calendarial telescopes can control the development of physiognomy in competition with genetics would correspond to the theme of the history of nazism - in the conflict between administrative and genetic/poetic logic. That conflict between macroscopic and microscopic 'government' of the body could be contained in the idea that a certain calendarial numeral takes the place of the law of Moses for the sake of cosmic harmony. This could be a part of the background for the administative persecution of the jews.
Is there a 'new time' (post-1957) wherein the phenomena of the world now are taking on new forms and combinations which cannot be traced to a once historic origin in either divine creation or simply by historic conceptualization? If there is, then it only means that the new administrations think of themselves as divine, and all that thinking is of course not much more than pretext for violence. Which probably is the conclusion to all this nazism and the Klipra and Jar connections. Some will say that much is lost by such 'rationalization' of the old culture, but much is gained in terms of new computability. Or, rather, new naivity. The naivity is the loss of the sense that the historic reality is created from within the subject. That is the new naive information technology.
Jar-Chomsky-Klipra = Anglo-Jute-Saxon
If the story is two connections - Klipra and Jahr - it could have a chomskyan node in the middle and quasi-symmetric left- and righthand sides, which could mean that the plan could be to run the scheme of the 20th century over again in the 21st, could be with the forwards causation of the 20th century replaced with a backwards causation of the 21st. That could mean that the plan is to make nazism in Germany and fascism in Italy - forwards or backwards, over or under - for a repeat orchestrated on basis of the experiences of the 20th century. My analysis of the 'keys to heaven' of Acts 10 shows how these 'keys' could find an interpretation in the chomskyan language hierarchy, developed at the beginning of the 'cognitive revolution' from about 1957 onwards, and one can probably show how the permutations or rather semantics of the categories of the 'keys' can be recognized in the basic architecture of the chomskyan grammars and language hierarchy. And in the Fast Fourier Transform.
If the Klipra and Jar connections are the left- and the righthand side of a pushdown automaton, so are the Oslo Report and Eisenhower doctrine structures via Gen.1-10 and Gen.11-19 as double sonnets. Or maybe the construction more resembles Oslo Report forwards and backwards (Gen1.1-10, 21-30) as left- and righthand contexts, with the Eisenhower doctrine in the middle (Gen.1.11-20) as a grammatical node containing the cognitive revolution. Then chomskyan grammar - the socalled 'cognitive revolution' which started at the time of my birth - could be an attempt to prove (historically in the gap between the connections, and in the year of the publication of the Eisenhower doctrine) that the combination of the two can be lifted onto a new 'context-free phrase structure level' of information technology for the new 'sentence level' knowledge taking over after the 'morpheme level' knowledge installed in the cultural development with Christ. This could mean ideas of a 'computable history' - although any such optimism which could have ruled the world of rulers some decades ago probably is about to fade today. One century on the lefthand branch, the next on the righthand branch of the node - and with a chomskyan control of history thereby - that is rather naive. Could it even be that this apparent rooting in Genesis is the reason why it is called 'generativism'? The public reason is of course that the context-free phrase level can mean a 're-creation' or 'generation' of the historic reality, even in the sense of a divine government, by way of a generation of a non-redundant defined subset on the language level. These political aspirations could reach to the stars - with a dream of a computerized control of the cosmic harmonies - under the authority of a 'divine government' on earth. All this theoretical 'lifting' - from the material storage format to a spiritual storage format beyond history - a la the body on the cross is, though, probably to be considered something resembling the famous diagonal proof of Cantor - which means that if only one can accept the violence not only against human bodies but even more against their rationality, then one can reach a new level of administrative power. It is likely that this is the aspiration of those who want to repeat the 20th century for a right-hand context. Historic timelines, folding history around the year 1000, 1500, and so forth. It is the program of power-before-truth, and hence also the war against the intellectuals, since intellectuals sometimes insist on rationality and hence they constitute a threat against this program of the 'cognitive revolution'. All the mathematical philosophy is of course a thin pretext for the violence only - could be quite simply for 'british wellness' only. The role assigned to me in the mythos circus is apparently to be the 'dirty beast in the revelation' - could be planned to be a dumping-place for the problems of nazism, including the cause of all sorts of problems and the catholic curse on the anglicans - which could mean the fact that all this tragic logic is nothing new and has been tried over and over again by administration since the dawn of time and is conceptualized in the new era of 'violence against human rationality' with the socalled fact that 'all spectra leak' and one cannot construct a filter which catches up all information in the transform from time to frequency as long as one is computing with discrete units - which is where british logic bites its own tail. But that is the british program of a computational heaven which is designed to make it possible to enter heaven never mind what their conscience may look like - probably by quite simply replacing St.Peter with an automaton into which one can put in some coins which the machine will swallow - the entry fee for the new computerized heaven. This could solve their deep-seated problem of transubstantiation, a problem which seems to have troubled the britons since Henry VIII and to which they have launched this 1850-rooted concept of context-free phrase structure grammar which seems capable of a mysterious leap in the knowledge from the left- to the righthand side without intermediate storage on a memory stack. It could even include ideas of a new drug-based economy. This mystery receives its interpretation in the 'social cognition' of faithfulness in marriage whereby logical consistency is maintained by the same 'sausage' in the same 'fissure' every day.
'Generative' grammar
If Gröver/'Mengele' was a secret agent for England (was in the custody of England, that would mean, since England would have his authority), and the 'king of England' was 'the ultimate organizer of the mass extermination of the genetic stock of Jews', nazi logic tells that if I either were given some tissue from Nelly Sachs' ovaries (from 1953) to consume as a child or by the mashed foetus injected by the school dentistry in 1970-71, the fact that I was in Gröver/'Mengele's custody - and it is precisely the custody vs genetic parenthood which the story is about - would mean that I would be the 'king of the England' since I would be 'the ultimate organizer of the mass extermination of the genetic stock of Jews/juice'. This is a cheap linguistic trick but it seems to be potentially active in administration. The mashed foetus could be called 'juice' in the syringe. This expression would also mean the essential three parametres of nazism:
1) the ultimate organizer = pederasty in the colon
2) of the mass extermination = cannibalism of the colon meeting 1)
3) of the genetic stock of Jews/juice = genocide
(This could also make it equivalent in some quasi-political sense with the expression 'and God saw that it was good' from the opening verses of Genesis). If, in addition, MLR april 1957 means me as a 'walking ad for nazism', the structure of a combination of Klipra and Jar connection with a chomskyan node between - or a front and a back ad connected with strops or straps over the shoulders - means that this ultimate organizer etc is not just any organizer - it could be the plan that I should represent this concept particularly - for a mixmax recognition as Adolf Hitler and the dirty beast in the revelation. But that means that there would be more than just any featural identity between me and the king of England in that sense of it. Hence the branching chomskyan tree would look like this (the branches denote custody relations):
king of E
/ \
/ \
Gr/M other agent
/ \
/ \
me
official sisters
But since by the essential parametres of nazism I am identical with the king of England in that sense of it, it means that this feature of essential nazism would percolate up through the 'syntactic tree' of a chomskyan branching structure and could land at the other agent, for example. It means that the plan with much modern syntactic theory could be to install these political parametres of nazism into 'generative grammar' for modelling the social space therewith - and thereby replace traditional genetic or conventional employment relations with the custody relations of drug addiction under control from the headquarter in London, contolled by way of the three parametres. (It could be that drug addiction is seen as essential to some such secret agency relations, although I know not much about this). Such drug addiction could on the one hand take the place in the traditional semiotic theories on the constitution of meaning of the sign - replacing it with a Mengele-chemical semantic glue under the control of central administration, on the other hand it could be incorporated into feature-oriented syntactic theory under development for describing natural human language. There is a lot of esoteric theory on grammatical theory and it is generally difficult for a non-informed to test the models under elaboration since it takes a lifetime to master enough foreign languages to test the relevant aspects of the models - which, of course, always can be declared possible and valid theories anyhow and generally are tested on english only. It would be nazism - with its resources from the death camps of Himmler - which comes to constitute the information flowing through the stucture of the social space by this construction, and it is probable that the plan is to develop drugs which serve to take the place of parts of the human chemical system for a relegation of control with the production of them from the inner system to the outer - and implement this into agency relations whereby people do what the central government in London wants them to do in accordance with the syntactic theories implemented for understanding human communication on basis of the fundamental resource in the death camp and holocaust structure of Heinrich Himmler. These drug-affiliated social structures could then be modelled in new principles of economy. That is the monarchic model which seems to have led to Hitler - very very opposite of the french republican revolution of 1789. The monarchic model is the complete extermination of any individual creative capacities and freedom including the notion of poetic creation of the historic reality from within the subject. The supercomputer in London is probably meant to be able to control people's thoughts anywhere on the globe - which of course is the complete end of all creativity and spontaneity and chances for a change of system. This is the model which seems to be under elaboration in the international political world of today - it means that the Founding Fathers of the third millenium will be called Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler. Add Goebbels and Göring from San Pantalon. And everybody believe that it is the opposite - that these are the madmen whom the heros from England battled and thereby England rescued the freedom of the world - as if they were the best of french republicans. It may be a little late for the world to discover the trick today. The Free World was the normal US slogan against the communists after the war - this 'generative model' of the world is apparently what they meant with the 'free world'.
A goodness-driven economy - whereby only goodness pays off - as an alternative to such leftist-fascist drug-and-terror-driven economy - can turn the human thirst for money into a drive towards social goodness which thereby could rescue human subjectivity and creativity and freedom. The british-monarchic system of keeping everybody in leash for controlling their acts and thoughts would have its rationale only within the framework of a british spirituality which calls for terror in order to function (and for bringing british wellness to a small subset of the world instead of goodness to everybody) - and that is something which it is difficult for other people to understand. Hence the monarchic model is under elaboration without anybody being informed about it and hence without anybody being able to stop it.
The current economic crisis in Greece is possibly meant to be the strops or straps over my shoulders - for the the chomskyan node of the walking ad for nazism. That sort of ridiculous policy would not be much worth - and could have been created in order to enhance this function of featural percolation in the 'grammatical' social system where one finds new transcendent spirituality as context-free phrase structure grammar which, though, is on a surprisingly finite and symbolic format. It would apparently also reinforce the importance of MLR. I think the world should ask for this scandalous periodical to be closed down if it is an organ for terror and fraud announced in advance.
People seem to believe that the world nowadays is working with the implementation of Lenin's communism. That is not right: It is Hitler's nazism which is under implementation and the misunderstanding is due to the hijack of Lenin's revolution by the Klipra connection - and Mao's by the Jar connection. Communism is freedom of the subject - so much freedom that people can leave their doors unlocked because other people don't steal and therefore the concept of ownership (= the need for a fence against your neighbour) goes out of use - communism is not the mass suppression which US propaganda used to tell about. But it is true that there probably is less theft in this sense of it today than earlier, and nobody really wants to make a thief of oneself for a little material or intellectual gain, and it is of course possible that communism can come to develop slowly in parallel with the technological revolution.
The academic issue: Power beyond truth has taken hold of even science and arts
The aim of international secret service is probably to take complete control with academic knowledge. Where is the institute of historic of political science which teaches the Klipra and Jar connections? Where is the institute of literary science which teaches the sonnet algorithm - or the theological institute which teaches the structure of Acts 10? Where is the institute of film science which teaches the presence of the Klipra connection in 20th century film - and for example can show the historic rooting in Klipra in such films as 'There's no business like show business' or the historic reason for Fellini's titles 8½, La Strada or Amarcord? It seems that 20th century film is almost only this political history - and film is over-ripe for a new narrative language - could be it is too late. My guess is that one does not find these institutes anywhere on the globe - simply because international secret service controls the whole academic business - and that should tell the whole story. 'Teaching' should not mean launching exemplary models, for example for claiming that a good sonnet is based on the permutation algorithm - it means presenting the facts needed for free thinking on the subject. But postwar nazism is not out for free thinking, on the contrary they try to get every individual's mind under governmental control in such a way that the 'mental contents' of the individual can be manipulated. "It is not permitted to tell why Fellini called his film '8½'", tells the inner big brother voice, since telling it could come to insult british power ('a telegraph' is the secret key to the assumption that John Grover 1823 in British Library probably was made in 1843). Of course it must be permitted to tell these things publically.
Is France couped intellectually? The question is what keeps the one part of the semiotic sign to the other - if it is Gröver/'Mengele's chemical art for a nazi government of the minds of the people or if it is a poetic logic for intellectual freedom. Pierre Boulez established in 1976 Institut de Recherche et de Coordination Acoustique/Musique (IRCAM), which should be exactly in the middle of that essential question. In April 2002, my money and chances ran out in Vilnius and I travelled to Paris and applied for political asylum (for example, I had been abducted to a psychiatric hospital in Norway while my own doctorate was rejected), which I did not get, but I got (instead, or for whatever reason) in december 2002 a pension from Norway which made it possible for me to live abroad. Arriving in Paris in April 2002, and being rather low in money, I sent an application to IRCAM (by Hugues Vinet) on a study of the correlation between the phenomenon of school shootings in USA and Europe, the names of the young desperates tended to correlate with cyclic temporalities in the first four books of my Endmorgan Quartet, but they did not answer. When in 2008 the last book (#16) of the same Endmorgan Quartet was completed in three first out of four parts, it was about the correlation of inner acoustics of my poetry - the inner revelational character of it, articulated probably on the inner interface to the working memory - with the outer acoustics of the music of Midori's recording of Bach and Bartok sonatas released in late 2007 or early 2008 - but I had written my poetry without access to the music and hence the correlation had been established without any overt outer-acoustic signal level inbetween, but maybe with an inner-acoustic jewish-revelation interface - which means that it was a purely intellecual or spiritual connection exactly on the essential point for this story. This would have been on the interface of book #16 established on basis of my book #15 ('Gentlemen'). Gröver/'Mengele's art would perhaps claim responsibility for the connection by referring to a sticky chemical attachment of the semiotic 'form' to the semiotic 'contents' of the poetic signs due to pedagogic economy if he - or perhaps rather 'Harlem', that could mean, who controlled his career - would claim to be controlling the spiritual forces of the universe. This chemical demiurgy is not my way, though, and I believe in a poetic inspiration on a spiritual level - a level of spirituality where the 'british problem' is solved, that means, cp. the parallelisms of Sachs and Celan with my book #15 - rather than the impositions of a propaganda level with relegation of articulation to an outer-acoustic interface. I sent in 2008 the book to IRCAM - who thereby could inspect the correlations themselves - with an invitation to answer (a fullfledged application would not be the thing after the first attempt), but they did not answer even then. (I hope it should not be necessary to dump the blame on a deficient post system). Could be this counts as a proof that France has been couped not only politically but even intellectually for the 'verboten' Mengele-format global government of the minds of the people. Such a coup would have been totally invisible while eating itself through the society like a worm in a computer - and could of course in principle rest on two such essential points: Roland Barthes in Combat in 1947 and the death of de Gaulle 562 months after Hitler's postcard. (These two could be represented in the deaths of Roland Pelzer and Carl Dreyfus some months before the death of Adorno in 1969). It is a matter of what keeps the semiotic sign intact. To this comes the 'Chomsky revolution' to which there attaches a certain tsunami of death camp mysticism which normally is not pronounced.
The new economic system of 'Mengele' type: The story of the banknotes
It was while I was in the ditch in Paris that I tried to earn some money by selling a little pamphlet I had written about the story, when an american came up to me and showed me a dollar banknote, I think it was: It showed a picture of a building in Washington which he folded S-wise with about a tenth overlap in the middle in such a way that the resulting image looked just like the photo of one of the twin towers in the moment after the jet had crashed into it on 11 September 2001. These banknotes had been in circulation for decades before 2001. This brought to my mind a story which my girlfriend from the mid seventies told me: She knew a person who lived close to the central bus station who knew the art of scissoring up banknotes and glueing them together in such a way that it produced an extra banknote: From 10 banknotes worth 1000 kroner each he scissored and glued to make 11 out of them. I don't know where she had the incredible story from but it clearly could have been the same story as I was shown in 2002. It means that americans had been holding the proof of the origin of the attack on Manhattan 2001 in their hands every day since then - and that means the total identity of Gröver/'Mengele's chemical arts for a new sticky economy with the new global government of the world in a new 'semiotic sign' of some countable value. The sales of my pamphlet did not take off - in fact I sold only one - not far from Sorbonne - but then I lost another 5 or 10 copies in the street soon after so there were were no financial gains. There were riots on Sorbonne in 2006. It is of course easy to use my invisible role - in the back seat of the T-262 in the late sixties - to engineer the idea in the french voters that I am the source of all sorts of problems in France, could be even of a coup by the death of de Gaulle in 1970. While such strategies of course would be to turn the roles completely around. The lack of an answer to my two letters to IRCAM tells that this temptation probably is all too near at hand and all too easy to accept.
Global power, european swastika and Mengele economy
If the plan is to make a Vietnam or Iraq out of Italy for swapping around on Norway, a bomb on Venice or the Vatican could be an efficient tool if 1) responsibility claims have been pronounced from UK/US through many decades in advance, and 2) it is an 'Al Qaida' or similar bomb for e.g. what is called 'islamic terrorism', a la Manhattan 2001 (cp. also the current debate on iranian nuclear refinements - modern propaganda could certainly convince the world that such a bomb came from Teheran), and if the most important precondition for such a vietnamization is fulfilled, 3) that nobody tells the story of the role of England in the mean time. If the story be pronounced as it is, then the construction of a global government on Mengele-chemical principles of government cannot easily continue, and then it would be difficult to turn Italy into a bombing target for swapping around with Norway in order to make a british authorship out of the hebrew sources since the invention of the alphabet.
It is a global monarchic system which seems to be the aim - the very opposite of 1789 in France. The ruling principle seems to be power by Mengele methods - chemicals injected into the blood for producing such horrible conditions that people would do almost anything to escape it. With new computerized surveillance one can easily find a target anywhere on the globe who is the optimal representation of some pivot point of political value, for an optimal political effect of such chemistry. If people in addition are forced to 'accept' such government, having no chance to pretend that they do not understand the meaning of the undertext in the double talk of the government, then a certain sticky semiotic 'attachment' could certainly be obtained - but what sort of society would that be? It would be that politics which tries to obtain with abuse of humans what my poetic project on Midori's music is about - and it would replace freedom of the spirit with redundancies of mind created by new spiritual suppression by means of which one could pretend to make some sort of 'telepathy'. We must hope that the plan is not to use WHO for carrying out such 'politics' of 'Mengele-chemical' economy and government.
The precondition for this system to come into being is that the real story of England does not surface. Today it seems that England allows itself almost unrestricted power - and nobody protests. When Jörg Haider died in a car accident in the night to Saturday the 11th after I had registered my new address in Venice on the 10th, it was announced in International Herald Tribune some days later (on Tuesday the 14th) that british defense authorities had announced in the preceding week that they had lost control with a hard drive with (probably non-encrypted) sensitive information on hundreds of thousands of soldiers. When polish president Kaczynsky died in april 2010, it seems to have been announced in advance in MLR April 2010. With the bombings of apartment buildings in Moscow in september 1999 or in the underground in March 2010 it seems to have been clear that the bombings would have been organized by western interests, although a female caucasian suicide bomber was blamed. It seems to be rather normal that one can find terror seemingly announced in advance in MLR. How come nobody protests? Why isn't there anybody telling the truth of the story? Politicians apparently follow another logic than scholars in politics or history. Had Moscow told the truth about the Klipra connection after WWII, MacCarthyism in USA could have drowned it in claims of communist propaganda and it could have triggered a serious crisis. Perhaps is that how it still is - after all, the problem of transubstantiation has lasted for some centuries and is not easily solved (although there seems to exist a poetic solution to the problem - and that is a part of the poetic logic which should have been developed since about 1850). The strategy of most politicians could be to try and deconstruct the whole edifice of nazi terror little by little without triggering violence, and if one responds to violence with violence, it only leads to a justification of UK/US terror. I don't know why it costs so much for a politician to tell a secret of state.
After a year at Harlem's institute SAO in Oslo in 1968-69, Gröver/'Mengele' got a chief doctor position in Fredrikstad from 1970 onwards - sharing his time between half time chief doctor of the geriatric department and half time chief doctor of the department of social medicine. One guesses that this could be telling of an 'extermination-and-replacement program': One geriatric patient out of the world for letting another secret agent from abroad be installed smoothly into the society (although I suppose his patients in social medicine were normal folks). He talked of social medicine as being as difficult as getting toothpaste ('tannpasta') back into the tube - and there seems to have been quite a lot of terror or politics on the 'TAMPA' format - even the name of Osama bin Laden could be seen to resemble this concept. One could fancy that the story of Norway, with its glorious mythological past, could invite to such an 'extermination-and-replacement program' on the aboriginal norwegians for a slow and gradual replacement of them with foreign naturalized agents. One notices how 'aboriginal norses' seems to have a phonological echo in the name of state chief of Iraq 'Abdul Karen Qassim' (who couped Iraq from king Feisal), as in the discussion above of the Eisenhower doctrine (#1). Such a theoretical program could also be spotted in the 'me-shah-hurrah' and 'lists' (both forms in hebrew meaning roughly 'John, Bjarne, Gröver') references which could be contained in the double chief-doctorate of Gröver/'Mengele'. It is of course likely that this goes on to some extent, in particular if Norway serves as a sort of political template for the rest of the world for the british aspirations of a global government, but it goes without saying that it would be difficult to discover - and hence any such ideas would remain speculative, even here. But it is worth while mentioning the double chief doctor position in particular if Gröver was Mengele and if 'Mengele chemicals' is the new format of economy for modelling the historic consciousness.
It goes without saying that all this history of connections seem to establish a role for Norway as a point of 'challenge' eastwards - cp. Hitler's early concentration camp 'Esterwegen', which also could mean 'Öster-reich' = Bjarne Eidsvig's oyster farm - which seems to tell that much of the political problems could be solved by an annexation of Norway into Russia. But that could even be a part of the definition of NATO - as long as there is any interest for this program around.
Why hasn't anybody told this story?
The riddle remains how it could come about that nobody has told this story. It is likely to be the same story over and over again that politicians believe that the people deep down in their hearts know everything about what is going on behind the closed doors of politics and that this tacit knowledge is the basis for their votes. Which is not true: The people know only what they are told in explicit wording. This phenomenon is likely to be the reason for the situation in England where the people probably give their administrations full confidence - and therefore the administrations believe that they have the public's support in their policy. The trick about Hitler and the british heros who saved the world from the dreadful nazism is probably still functioning. If the people of England get a complete account of the practicalities of the administration through the decades since about 1907, it is likely that this naive self-confidence of the administration will vanish - and that could perhaps elicit problems of conscience and feelings of treason even in the hardboiled parts of the administration who deal with the practicalities. As of today, it seems that the shared historic consciousness of England does not administer bad conscience to their administration simply because they don't know about any reason for it. This is a factor which could have been essential also for the 'russian mistake' - that the revolution apparently never told the people about the Klipra connection. Lenin should have told the british and american people about this Klipra connection: It is not enough that the administration knows the secrets. As long as the people do not know it, the development of administrations comes to go more and more in the direction of a coup against their own people - towards a quasi-monarchic system - and this comes to give shape to what one could call international secret service in a united front against the people of the earth in the formation of a new upper class which is not troubled by bad conscience but is planning a grace automaton to take the place of St.Peter.
Politics seems prone to go in this trap: They probably firmly believe that if they carry out cruel experiments against individuals in the most complete secrecy and in deep basements which nobody can tap, the people will turn against them and vote for somebody else even if they have not heard the details, quite simply because the people do not want such cruelties. And conversely - if they do carry out such cruelties and the people do not vote against them, it means that the people accept that policy. That is not true. This faith in the deep tacit knowledge in the people about everything which goes on in the administration is what perhaps can be called the axiom of the fourth state power which is the basis for the formation of a new upper global class called international secret service. The axiom tells that moral scruples are administered by the historic subconsciousness of the people and that the people will stop the politicians if they are on the wrong course, however secret their projects may be. It is this axiom which is the basis for a fourth state power which derives from the assumption that legislation and politics are one and the same thing. That is when legislation comes to be the art of mythmaking more than lawmaking. And that is when the axiom really comes to be the formulation of the fundamental principle in politics of helplessness as the constituting factor, since the axiom leads to a complete inability to articulate the secrets of state to the public.
Is the reason why the story is not told that telling it would mean focussing on innocent individuals who are not involved - such as me? Would there be enormous media attention to my person if the story was announced from a responsible administration? Well that is the sort of idea which probably keeps the project going: What must be announced is that I am NOT a part of this program and I am NOT involved and have absolutely nothing to do with all this politics. That is to tell the true story - and then the nazi programs on me stop functioning. But if the names of all or most CIA directors since around 1977 conspire on the idea that I am a secret agent, which I am not (and therefore these CIA chief names), then of course CIA will not be interested in telling this essential detail - nor in telling the story at all. And that must be because they want the nazi program to continue - with e.g. more genocide in the 21st century. But then somebody else should tell this story in a decent and unhysterical manner.
My view is that England is the deepest reason for all this nazi history and that USA, to the extent that they are involved in the development of postwar nazism, serves as a sort of running boy for England, such as in Vietnam - but with the hope of taking over the business when England is mature for being pensioned off. That is perhaps not so far away into the future. And USA do not have the same state church problems, which means that the root of the problem perhaps could come to vanish gradually with a US takeover. This may be a normal and widespread view in politics - enough perhaps to lend a quasi-justification for 'US nazism' - but why aren't the public told about the reasons for it?
The austrian 'Staatsvertrag' from 1955 - the conditions for their independence after negotiations with the winners of the war - contains a clause in article 10 telling that the state is 'obliged to liquidate the leftovers of nazism' ("Österreich verpflichtet sich [...] auf die Liquidierung der Überreste des Naziregimes"). Could be that is the reason why there is not so much british tongue to be heard in the streets of Vienna. There are some americans around, though. This phenomenon relative to this paragraph in their constitution could be telling of a factual knowledge of the history in the people of England. But then they must get the chance to choose another course of the history without having to continue as before. But then they must get the details of the factual history, and an axiom of a fourth state power - telling that they know it all deep down in their hearts and that should suffice - cannot help them there.
The recoil and the leakoil
The story of nazism seems to be contained in the british response to the french revolution - with its three motto words Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité. When my name was constructed for the construction of e.g. Treblinka, there could have been the double sense of my name that it also can refer to these three motto words from the french revolution. In fact one could even construct an overoptimistic image of nazism as a recoil of the french revolution - as if e.g. Treblinka were such a revolutionary shot against unjust abuse and exploitation. It may be that this idea is more than a joke on my name. It could be a trick applied to Mao like one used the doctorate degree on Lenin for couping his revolution - his 1892 russian university diploma of 'first degree' compared with a german 'doctorate degree' of cheaper kind - which could mean a '6-6-6' degree compared with the 'first degree' of Leningrad. This could have been the formality used for couping his revolution with the double-doctor status, e.g. of Gröver/'Mengele' in Fredrikstad - and it could have been used for an extermination-and-replacement program, for example of type 'me-shah-hurra' + 'lists' which have hebrew interpretations in my name, for couping Lenin's revolution. When my own PhD dissertation (which really should have been accepted, according to my view) was rejected in a letter of late july 1998, there followed some days later the bombing of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania - which could have been for the encoding of 'dirty beast in the revelation' in the sense of 'Dr.Verboten'. One could believe that the bombing was made by US authorities (under Clinton, that means) for the sake of this political effect. It took place on 7 August 1998, which was 12 years after the death of Petter Andre Syversen = PAS in the mid point between the GAS disasters of Bhopal and Halabjah. These 12 years is an interval found in other contexts (such as e.g. from the handshake of the russian tsar and the german emperor in 1904 to the birth of John Jensen in 1916). There was after the rejection letter in 1998 also the bombing of Omagh which could have been for abusing my own poetry (TEQ 22.01.98, the poem 'Linda hang something up just' containing the line 'that gives black-o-mag in the last/past') for such 'dirty business' for turning it into 'poetry verboten' - as if for the 'nazism' flowing through the grammars of political structure. I am of course not involved in any dirty intrigue on my authorship even if a future downgrading of the very secret archives of UK/US could come to tell that I am. Secret archives are dangerous historic sources since they present the contents of intrigue (or call it 'power') rather than of truth. The trick for couping Mao's revolution - comparable to the doctorate of Lenin - could be this 'throwing-up' of the 'Lang-gewehr' (Luxemburg found in the 'Landwehrkanal' four months after having been mistreated by Otto Runge's rifle butt and eventually shot - 2 weeks after Drexler and Harrer founded the nazi party - cp. also 'Otto Trier Nachf.' of Hitler's postcard) on the shoulder for a 'french-looking' revolution which converts my name into a positive triple rather than the old 'dirty beast in the revelation' - by way of the interpretation of nazism as a recoil of the french revolution. There could be 'revolutions' against local 'despots' (quasi nazi) coming up in many countries for installing this concept. There was also a 'leak-oil' in the mexican gulf around the time of the end of the 40 years of negotiations on the division line between Norway and Russia in the Barents Sea on 27 april 2010. If this rig disaster were meant to tell that the UK general election some days later was a 'rigged' disaster, one could even ventilate the hypothesis that this election result were indicative of a british orientation towards the idea of a russian takeover in Norway - whatever that could mean.
In the permutational scheme of the 'terza rima', this throwing-up of the 'Lang-gewehr' of Luxemburg (or Hitler?) could correspond to the line 666 lifted up to 111 - and to the 'heil Hitler' sign which seems to have been modelled on a cuneiform LAL. For the sonnet, this would correspond to the 11-11-11-11 lifted up to 1-1-1-1 - which could also turn the upside-down double sonnet into two normal sonnets. This could even be a part of the effect from the US invasion of Iraq if that invasion served to take apart the double-sonnet effect of the numerality of 23 - in which case one could see a US interest in a takeover of the british business by way of the invasion of Iraq - which was preceded by the invasion of Afghanistan. If this is the trick for couping Mao's revolution, it corresponds to the former 'doctorate' = 'bra' of Lenin, which also is a symmetric construction of two hemispheres with a grammatical 'node' holding them together in the front (Hitler's postcard to 'Eugene Paisseau'), including strops and straps behind. If the end of the butt is the new strategy, it means that the former bra is lifted from the chest up to the shoulder while undergoing a change in material substance. Hence this 'chest of drawers' is the quasi-solution to the problem of 'transubstantiation'. This is of course a great mistake and it could even be a way of lifting the problem from England over to USA when these take over the business. One could speculate that this could be the reason why the Bush administration could not take Iraq without first taking Afghanistan - since otherwise the invasion of Iraq could be propaganda for Brundtland-Blair-Clinton (the 'perestroika'?) and that this complex even would have been contained in the russian invasion of Afghanistan in 1978.
This phenomenon could be a further reason for political interests in my name. For example, it could explain the phenomenon that names of CIA chiefs since about 1977 seem to conspire on the idea of me as a secret agent.
The european swastika
The conclusion on the european swastika seems to be that the swastika on the one hand is conceived of as me - by my chin in genetic inheritance from Sachs and Celan - and on the other is the european swastika which can be constituted around Paris, with arms north in Norway, south in Italy, west in England and east as the Black Sea Loop, and with counterhooks in Iceland, Israel, Ireland - and north of eastern Europe, such as Vilnius or e.g. Chernobyl. This swastika has a global projection which embraces the wars of Iraq (temporally by the double sonnets upside-down) in the gulf and Vietnam as the other side of Norway on the globus. This means a global spread of this swastika installed since at least the sixties - and the plan is probably to let this quintessential nazism be installed into world economy by way of the custody relations of families and secret agency in a chomskyan modelling of the political and economic space. That means my person - mythologically the dirty beast in the revelation - percolating qua nazism - the very walking ad for nazism of MLR april 1957 - through the economic nodes of the political space. The core jewish-genetic diaspora family ('anglo-saxon jews', so to speak) would have been constructed for such branching nodes of this political grammar constitued by the custody relations, and this structure would be based on a semiotics for a drug-based economy - and then it could possibly be an unhappy experience of mine from Hammerfest with a 'Mengele-chemical' injection which would be the basis for the principle of economy and government. That is called nazism: It is the program of Adolf Hitler.
This could also be the contents of the phenomenon that politics seems to be consituted not only by the helplessness which prevents politicians from communicating these essential aspects of the story to the public but also by their propensity for intrusion into poetic logic in an attempt to hijack it, as if to find an ostrich-hole while waiting for the problems to pass. The example with the three poems by Sachs, Celan and me can tell of what sort of problems poetry can solve and which politics tries to hypostasize unsolved - as the Mysteries of the Nazi Cult - for the definition of this global nazi program. Clearly this could even have been the very purpose with the political construction of secret agents in custody relations to the state being in custody relations to the 'genetic jews', such as also Sachs and Celan seem to have been born into: That could have allowed for a 'syntactic' control with the 'jewish-poetic' information flow in the socio-political space. Hence the state would control columns 1 and 2 in the 16-summary 'keys to heaven' format and leave column 3 to the jewish-poetic children. Then the pretext behind the construction could have been that 'this is the construction of a jewish world of poetic logic' - hence also the british interests in establishing the state of Israel - while in actual fact it is the complete control with it. England and Norway could then be thought of as representing columns 1 and 2 in the 'keys to heaven' and Israel (or Italy, in the swastika form) as a transform of the jewish diaspora could be thought of as column 3 - and hence the idea of a foldover for a hijack of the jewish-poetic field. The bankruptcy of Iceland and the apparent interests in the icelandic settlers Arnarson and Frodadottir would come in this light. Then the political interests with a vietnamization of Italy or a start of the Black Sea Loop would be for England to acquire full control with the authorship to the first origins of the mythology for the alphabetic technology, to complete Lenin's idea (could be as articulated by England) that only the third column has any interest.
This program is also the reason why one is allowed to speculate on plans for a consolidation of the idea of a swastika on Europe - with some major manifestation on Italy as the counterpoint to Norway and the Black Sea Loop to England. If NATO plans to detach Norway for a russian takeover, that can be about a plan for a swapover detachment of Italy. Not the least for such reasons do the people have a legitimate right to get all details for such plans on the table - so that one can avoid a third and fourth world war and massive installation of verboten-driven economic principles. Nobody wants that and it is a game of politics only. And the damage to the world can come to be so large that the psychotic addict hardly can get up on its feet again. The pretext they can have constructed - that this should be the construction of a 'world of jewish-poetic logic' - is at best ridiculous. It would resemble the idea in 'Odilo Globocnik' that Rilke's angelic voice for his Duino elegies were Satan.
A program of a new global government based on an economy by custody vs genetic relations flowing through a 'chomskyan' modelling of the grammatical-political space would, to the extent that it is fundamentally based on the mythological role of a few persons, be very vulnerable to the 'threat' from the possibility that the whole secret can be told in a few sentences. If these few sentences or pages be told, there is not much left of the whole edifice. Hence the massacres on the school in Erfurt and on the parliament in Zug and the local council in Nanterre not long after 2000 could have served to imitate the idea that 'Germany and Switzerland and France do not support the development of this global system of government but will not take the responsibility of dismantling the whole thing by telling the story right out without the rest of the world agreeing to it'. Is this the truth? Is the wildly insane massacre in Erfurt a way for the german authorities to tell that they do not support the program and strongly recommend that it be dismantled - but cannot just tell it right away without the rest of the world agreeing to it? And they say it by referring to the idea that Russia dismantled its Soviet Union for telling the same? It must be noticed that the high precision in the Erfurt massacre relative to Gen.1.21 means that it was not a lonely madman but a secret service project which must have been sanctioned by the government. It could mean that Germany could not tell this secret and remain in NATO, for example, but they could not keep it either - so they told it that way. The secret could have been this 21 of the sonnets upside-down in Iraq and Afghanistan, for example - could be even that Saddam Hussein was an agent for USA or England - as a part of the vietnamization of Italy. The revelations about Helmut Kohl could have been a part of the same story-telling. One notices also the name of my neighbour Kari Löveid from Voldgata 1 relative to this idea of Iraq upside-down - or the encoding of Satan via the end of Gen.1.21 - and the Columbine high school massacre. But that idea of terror as an expression of a stance relative to the global project would, though, in particular in the long run, be only a very weak pretext - and it would be a way of accepting the essential role of secrecy in administration. It means a coup of the democratic power - and the establishment of a new global upper class of rulers controlling the great mob of uninformed people all over the world. The fact that helplessness seems to be the most important constituting factor in politics after WWII is exemplified by this massacre from Erfurt. This is not a highly delicate matter - it is a matter of getting the facts on the table and the truth told as quickly as possible - otherwise we face a global tyranny against truth - and there can follow centuries of darkness. The truth should have been told by Lenin - and then there would have been no nazism - but instead they eventually had to pack down the whole revolution. It is well possible that 'Fanny Jefimovitsch Kaplan' had understood the critical importance of Lenin telling the story because her name resembled 'Modern Language Review'. Politicians probably think for and against this crazy 'system' of Mengele chemicals injected into innocent index-carrying individuals - is it a good way to govern or is it not? - but that is because they are politicians who have no chance to understand the concerns of the rest of the world. They are apparently particularly unable to understand poetic logic - and that is the essence of the story. And that is when the massacres of Erfurt, Zug and Nanterre is nothing but international secret service - representing UK/US power - telling that they are in control of the country.
It is possible that a 'Jar connection' could have been moved from Jar outside Oslo to Venice. If this also means that the Vulgata 1.21 = Gen.1.21 is redefined e.g. from house-space to body-space (cp. the 'keys to heaven'), it would be a piece of administrative logic which could imply that Eisenhower becomes the same as Adolf Hitler. Which could be the purpose with the whole story, including Vietnam-Iraq-Italy. The factory which Eisenlauer and Karl Mengele bought in 1907 had earlier been building mills ('Oslo Report'), but when they took over they changed the production into mill repair only ('Eisenhower doctrine') and started producing agricultural machines in general, 5-star or not, (this is according to Völklein's biography of Mengele, a book which also reproduces some of Mengele's alleged poetic production after the war). This story could tell that Josef Mengele's father (who seems to have been Eisenlauer, according to the pullout story after the birth of Josef) in principle could have been e.g. Hitler: 'Eisen-lauer' = 'idol-hauer' ('Bildhauer') = 'Adolf Hitler' (according to Gen.1.26) - hence the intermediate 'Eisen-hauer' with his 'doctrine'. This is administrative logic. It rests essentially on the role of hebrew - which could allow for some further studies in the forms involved: Hebrew AISeNaA = store-house, granary, 'magazzini' [e.g. 'di sale'], while AaSaNaA = thorn-bush, bramble, shrubbery fruit, bramble nut, while AeDaL = cress, garden cress (while water cress = norwegian 'brönn-karse'), from AD = cloud (where e.g. the son of man can be coming). H[a]UeR = teacher, father, hence the ambiguity of custody vs genetic relations. LaAU = no, not, but, and LAI = to labour, to be tired. Which means that the whole historic complex is summed up in these forms which relate Eisenhower to Eisenlauer via the concepts of teacher/father and the one who was tired of the work and pulled out of the business when Josef Mengele was born - could be that was the only way (for the 'Eisenliar') to tell that Karl Mengele was the genetic father. This tells that 'Idol Fitler' is the father of Josef Mengele administratively and Eisenlauer genetically, and Eisenhower is inbetween. Bush on Zattere at the 'magazzini di sale' could be about this complex.
The rulers of Germany in 1945 were 1) Hitler, 2) Dönitz, 3) Eisenhower. That means that Karl Dönitz is about the donor of the sperm in 1910 - Karl Mengele or Andreas Eisenlauer. He was chief of Germany from 1 may to 23 may 1945, which means 23 days if one counts every day.
Gröver/'Mengele' had a particular liking for ice cream. An interesting observation when it comes to this story is the fact that there are 508 months, weeks and days, but not years and hours, between my birth and the birth of Nathan Milstein, whose name could be recognized in the former 'millstone' factory Mengele and Eisenlauer had acquired and reconstructed in 1907. But this is an administrative and not genetic relation. It is notable that Eisenhower, a 5-star general, made a sudden surprise leap in career when he went from his general call to accepting the job as President of the University of Columbia, before he leaped further on to President of the United States. One notices the 'Inhaber: Max Aberbach' of 'Otto Trier Nachfolger' on the postcard of Hitler from 7 January 1924. There could perhaps be a link from this 'Columbia' bach-max to the 'wide house' of his next station - not to speak of the bach-max of the space shuttle Columbia when it shipwrecked on its return to earth on 1.2.3.
The whole story seems to be about this relation between custody and genetic parenthood, and this story with Eisenhower is the background for his doctrine - about the middle east - in 1957. Albert Speer seems to be this 'peer hal berts' = Beer Hall Putsch of 1923 - which could be about this story with Mengele 1911. All this means that Mengele was perhaps the most important mythological character of WWII. For which reason it could be not much surprising to see that the whole death camp program is built around his person - and fatherhood relations. Speer published his 'Spandauer Tagebücher' in 1969, could be at the time when Sachs was operated against cancer and Bjarne Eidsvig went bankrupt due to his creditor Tage Pris. The whole story seems indeed to be centered around Josef Mengele - and that is why one could assume that the plan could be to turn his 'chemical arts' into the character of the new global economy. Clearly that is not a good idea. Nelly Sachs suffered from about the same time - which could have been a 'tage pris'. Her death in 1970 seems to have been installed with the 1970 days between the attempt on Lenin outside Michelson factories - for Michelson and Morley = Michelson and Motherly - and his death in 1924. If Mengele is the most important mythological person of WWII, that is also why one could believe that his 'eugenetics' profession could be telling of some role of e.g. Milstein and the calendarial telescope on his birthday relative to mine - with the 'swastika' theme etc. But this is something which administrations know something about - and they certainly should have to come out with the story. The history has shown that as soon as a political administration is allowed to keep something secret in the sense of hidden from the public which they administer, they start making this secret the foundation of their power and soon the coup and the new class division (based on this secret) is a fact.
This administrative logic relative to Eisenhower seems to be based on hebrew. In 2006 I was into the jewish community house in Vienna with a letter, and when Israel some time later bombed Beirut, it seemed to have been with indexing of this appearance of mine. After I in november 2008 had found the talmudic hebrew parallel text to my novel 'The Dreamer', Israel bombed the Gaza strip. This could on the one hand mean an indexing of a 'Jar connection', a la WWI, and on the other hand it could mean something resembling Erfurt, Zug, Nanterre etc.
I am not involved. I have absolutely nothing to do with all this politics. But it may be the plan of CIA and others to dump the blame of e.g. the death of Mao on me - or the role of Satan generally, or the dirty beast in the revelation. These plans could be as old as Visthouse 1907 or Sachs 1891 or Hitler 1889 or Ole Devold 1852 or John Grover 1843 or Norway 1814 after Napoleon - but that cannot justify a continuation of the madness. There can come nothing good out of such plans. It seems that somebody has cooked up a plan about Vietnam being similar to Norway and then Iraq is a sonnet upside down (the 'cognitive' module) 'and then we must fold Italy over Norway around Paris'. The plan was classified top secret and USA started the bombing of Vietnam. That is making power by way of abuse of people's faith. And soon there is no more faith and that is what came out of it.
The twin towers on Manhattan could have been built for the sole purpose of being knocked down in 2001. If the whole story with every detail a la these Hitler/Eisenhower hebrew forms come to be published and discussed in such a way that people can understand it, then perhaps one can come over this tragic period and start building the third millenium from scratch.
The classic misunderstanding of left and right
The history since 1814 can perhaps well be summed up like this: As England started to construct its nazism through the 19th century, in competition with the blossoming of jewish culture on the continent, a revolutionary communist-socialist movement accumulated for the one and only reason of preventing outbreak of british nazism, and when Lenin took over in 1917 it was for one and only one reason: To tell it out loud to the world what the plan was. When a few months had passed and he had not yet told it, he was shot by Kaplan who considered him a traitor against the revolution - which means against the global uprising against british nazism. It is not possible to stop nazism if the people is not completely informed about it and been given the chance to handle the problem with truth instead of power, since otherwise the battle is left to the art of politics and intrigue in administration, and then british nazism seems always to win. This is where we still are - and every day the leaders of the world have not yet told the story. It is probably the most incredibly wildly insane situation - that it is only to tell it in a few words and then it is stopped - and nobody does it! What is the matter with these humans?
Socialism or communism was in 1900 about the 150.000 - 200.000 according to Karl Liebknecht - Berlin workers who marched 5 hours behind the coffin of his father Wilhelm Liebknecht for his funeral after his death on 7 august 1900 - for showing their strength against the exploiting capitalists, who had to realize that they could just give it up - and, we must assume, for telling Lenin (and Liebknecht in the coffin!) that he had to tell the story. This element from Liebknecht's funeral could even have been a background of the Octogon project on me - qua treason against the deepest feelings of the people - and the dates 7 August 1986 (PAS between GAS and GAS) and 1998 (bombing of US embassies with Schmerlings Platz symbolism). For this as the background of the Octogon, cp. also the name of 'Vilhelm Aubert' for the 'Oslo Report' #4 - 'Vilhelm må bær[e]' = 'Vilhelm must carry', cp. 'John F.Kerry', 'Vilhelm mobber' - for the concept of turnaround of generations and the idea of Wilhelm Liebknecht's indignation at his son's lax morals or at least name, or for the concept of the workers' attitude to the one in the coffin. This could be the background of the Octogon, if the constructors of it have not understood it right - Aubert is not #6 but #4. Adorno was transported in a sealed coffin of zink from Visp to Frankfurt. Today the same 'socialist' movement seems to have degenerated into terror and monkey business - ruthless exploitation of those who are without the needed resources. A terror bomb can go off in a crowd of poor people for 'telling something' about the name of the place - often for 'referring to' an aspect of this mythological complex around the connections - or a massacre against innocent pupils in a school in Germany. Or simply a genocide in e.g. Rwanda - could be for 'telling something' about a 'Veranda'. This fascist left (british Labour seems to be the hallmark of just that) couped the revolutions from Lenin and Mao - and now they are couped by themselves and are becoming exactly the opposite of what they once struggled to be. It is not smart to coup other people's projects, in particular not their revolutions. It means that when England organized the holocaust, a mass extermination of britons is not easy to avoid, and since other people are perhaps not so interested in getting the bloodshed on their own hands, one can conjecture that the britons will have to do it themselves - which means a state-internal coup and tyranny for keeping the project going. (England seems to have tried to solve the problem by foot-and-mouth epidemics). That is of course the normal progress for such a 'project', and it may be that it is already in full swing - for example under the control of the national secret service. Could be England has tried to establish satellite states for letting the bloodshed go on there. Nor will it be easy for a swap-maniac american culture to avoid being swapped away - and they will probably have to do it themselves (such as they swap historic legitimacy with the aboriginal indians, for example). The combination of these two could be thought of as e.g. Norway and Israel as british satellite states plus the state-internal swap mechanism on the diaspora and/or Kursk-and-Cole - which could be contained in US aspirations for taking over the business from England. Could be the whole problem can be taken at the root by way of an international acknowledgement of the true story in the deaths of Lenin and Mao - which means crediting England (british Labour?) for the death of Lenin and US for the death of Mao - and for example avoiding the swap which credits me for Mao's death. An even deeper root of the problem could be in the hypocritical nourishment for their hijacks which UK/US could have gained from the historic fact that neither Lenin nor Mao told the russian/chinese and british/american people about the Klipra and Jar connections - and thereby the two murders (if they were so) could have gained a hypocritical historic justification. What remains for preventing the outbreak of a new anti-semitic or other type of holocaust is therefore a thourough critique of just these aspects of the story - and full daylight on the secrets which nourish the continued hijacks of the revolutions. Not the least for this reason should the american and british people try and tidy up in the matter - which seems to be on the hands of rather few people. For example, there cannot be any justification whatsoever for a state-organized Oklahoma bombing: It would have been an attack on the american people and is therefore an attempted coup. What is left of those 150.000 marchers today is the sabotage of the oil rig in the me-X-i-co gulfur for pretending that the election was rigged and that this leak-oil is the rec-oil of the french revolution: Word games like that, supported by terror and fraud. And people still vote Labour because they believe in what the 150.000 marchers of 1900 believed in. British Labour is probably not more than ordinary national socialism - with its international interests in the concept of 'british wellness' by terror abroad. In 1900 there could perhaps have been a reason for Labour's methods of gaining power, but today there cannot.
The crisis of this suiciding 'left' is really about a deeper crisis: The crisis of the symbolic logic, which has been the ultimate crisis since about 1850, and the once legitimate socialist movements have turned into a war against poetic logic. It led to the wrong information technology, and now christianity can be seen as a recursive pump 'S' working on jewish left- and right-hand contexts 'a' and 'b' - as simple as that! Then a whole universe of faith is reduced to the symbolic value of a single alphabetic letter. a = good conscience, b = bad concience, and S = a-S-b = productivity. It is because faith could move mountains in former days that the generativists were so optimistic about this social machine - but not many generations need to pass before this capacity of the faith and confidence and optimism is gone since all there is left of it is a few symbols on the paper. Presumably in the vain hope of replacing religious faith with modern administative telescopes on 'natural numbers' (23, 26, 185 etc) for an artificial cosmic harmony which probably is not much more than an attempt to bomb away the historic mirror return of own mistakes which an inner creation of the historic reality entails. But the cost of such an elimination of 'historic justice' is the loss of access to an inner eternity - and apparently the attempted solution to this is to gain such access by way of 'Mengele methods'. Similarly, a poetic line reduced to an 'S' is not much worth from a poetic point of view. Nor is it recommendable that a certain numeral of a calendarial telescope takes the place of the law of Moses for the sake of cosmic harmony.
The story seems to be the british couping of Lenin's revolution when the MacDonalds government started as the first Labour government the early morning after the death of Lenin - which was 1970 days after Kaplan's attempt on him in 1918. The trick of british Labour - or british administration generally - is the following logic: When the french revolution of 1789 was a revolt against the monarchic rule, the british reply to this with the defeat of Napoleon was a triumph of the british monarchic system - which they still have, as late as 2010. The logic goes that monarchy is based on genetics while the opposing republicanism consequently is based on a custody authority of the rulers relative to the people - in the opposition described in this book. That means, according to this reasoning, that the french revolution was a triumph of the custody relations in parental or administrative authority over the genetic relation. But this clearly is a serious misunderstanding - in particular when it is used for interpreting the 'genetic culture' of the jewish-genetic diaspora - which can be counterbalanced by the insight that democratic rule is not comparable to parental custody: Monarchy is top-down genetics while democracy is a bottom-up relegation of the custody authority from the people to the temporary rulers.
But this produces precisely two sorts of authority when analyzed as a revolt against the royal monarchy of France: On the one hand the custody top-down relation and on the other hand the bottom-up authority relegation. In this, the scheme resembles the chomskyan syntactic tree as a model of political and social structure - when based on agency relations in the formula 'the ultimate organizer of the mass extermination of the jews' - thereby being based on the three political parametres of british spiritualism. One can speculate that this is the historic origin of chomskyan or generative grammar. It means that chomskyan generativism is right and wrong at the same time - a phenomenon which everybody recognizes who has tried to understand a little of Chomsky's theories.
This can be seen as the british model of french republicanism - which is the 'trick'. When it is both right and wrong at the same time, it is the origin of the binary-symbolic logic which developed in England from about 1850 onwards and which came to be the basis for the modern computer. This logic is based on the truth values True and False, both of which are equally relevant to the same logic.
It is this story which seems to be at the roots of the misunderstanding of left and right in modern times. One can even speculate that the concepts of political left (or 'left behind') and right developed for precisely these reasons. Even british parliamentarianism could have been developed for these reasons - for making a bottom-up correlate to the monarchic top-down authority. It means that the 'british trick' - which tells that the french revolution of 1789, based on liberté, égalité, fraternité, was an attempt to get secret agency and the world of international secret service, the art of intrigue that means, through in the administrations of the state, and that modern revolutionaries should join this movement of intrigue - is at the heart of all reasoning based on binary-valued symbolic logic and the modern digital computer. It is a dirty trick which can be traced to the reasoning inherent in the phenomenon of british spiritualism - which seems to conclude that human reasoning cannot really function without a little genocide abroad now and then. At least outside the borders of Dover/Dovre of 1814. Rwanda 1994 could have been felt as refreshing in England, at the start of Blair's leadership in Labour. The Labour hegemony started with 2-3 'tacit years' (a sort of 'veranda' or 'ver an da' = 'every second day' in an unzipping algorithm for the 'keys to heaven'?) and could be it consisted of 16 years in total, 1994-2010, like an upside-down sonnet.
The alternative is poetic logic - which consequently should have been at the centre of interest for french intellectualism. The above example from the parallel poems of Sachs, Celan and me can give a flavour of the way of reasoning of poetic logic. Poetry should be a very exact and serious study of human reasoning. Instead of the binary-valued symbolic approach, this poetic logic would be concerned with understanding the influx of information from eternity (without competing with the divine when it comes to their 'semantic competence') and could be capable of being a foundation for the construction of an information technology which can send information through eternity and thereby break the informational encapsulation of the earth in the universe. It should no longer be about left and right in 'politics' - it should be about the status of the semiotic symbol: The 'nazi' movement who believe in the signal level of information from which a computing mind extracts data and make data analyses for its semantics, and the 'poetic' movement which sees the semiotics of human signification be established on the interface to an eternity which cannot be assessed on a signal level. Most Labour and thereabout politics seems to believe in the 'nazi' variant, and what is left of 'Geisteswissenschaft' seems to resemble political right more than left - which tells of the deep confusion that has arisen from the 'british trick': Lenin's communism was an attempt to rescue the poetic revolution - and that is, as goes the hypothesis here, why he took the name 'Lenin' after Leonie Sachs. It was the dirty british trick with the hijacking of his revolution which caused the confusion - plus perhaps the deplorable error which Lenin could have committed of not telling it out loud to the british and amercian people what were the plans in their own countries. England may perhaps claim that these two reasons for the confusion are two sides of the same coin. The binary-symbolic british alternative to this eternity-based semiotics seems to be the 'space travels' of victims of Dr.Mengele's chemical art - sent out into the universe by chemical soul-explosions in the blood - with its semiotics based on the addictive glue in the interface between 'form and meaning', as it can be depicted on a blackboard with two half circles mashed into each other. Which tells of the fatal error in the british symbolic logic. Torture and pure evil - or quite simply weird 'power' - seems to be their alternative to a poetic truth-based logic. The old demiurge with high aspirations.
The wellington
Walter A.Berendsohn was a scholar of literary theory or history who seems to have been central in the discovery of Nelly Sachs (at the end of the war). In the years 1958-60, he was in contact with her for some details of her life. He has noted some peculiarities, which I cite from Hermann Zabel's "Zweifache Vertreibung - Erinnerungen an Walter A.Berendsohn" (Klartext, Essen 2000), page 141: At age 17 she met a man of good family but the circumstances did not allow them to meet or marry. This seems to have been the cause of her very serious anorexia which lasted for two years. Berendsohn has noted, from his communications with Sachs, that this relation to the unknown man was her entire life. He allegedly died as resistance fighter. He quotes Sachs: "Er wurde (vor meinen Augen) gemartert und schließlich umgebracht. Daraus ist meine ganze Dichtung erwachsen". He notes furthermore about her depression after the death of her mother that she had taken a large heap of manuscripts, notes, poems, which nobody would read, and had thrown them in the garbage. The next day at five o'clock in the morning she saw from her window how the garbagemen in their wellingtons stuffed her manuscripts into their garbage car".
Now the combination of these two quotes could leave the combined idea arising in the head of the reader: 1) She told me she had been laid (by the man), and 2) she had left an egg in a sanitary towel for fertilization. These two ideas can get a joint expression in norwegian: "O sa ma bin la den". ('Bin laden' in the sense of 'being laid' is perhaps strictly speaking more english than norwegian, but it is comprehensible).
In addition, the combined expressions could leave the idea that 1) she had not been mutilated in her vagina in her infancy and had normal menstruation, and 2) she had got her poetry from somebody else (a garbageman or something like that, for example one also working at Hitler's house).
One notices the parallel to this ambiguity in the name of Timothy McVeigh who was sentenced for the Oklahoma bombing. The film called 'The bridge on the river Kwai' was released a few weeks after my birth in 1957 - and today of course I would speculate if it refers to the bridge between Calle Pedrocchi and campo San Barnaba in Venice.
Now the name of Walter A.Berendsohn (I notice also the author of the article in Language 1996 after the Oklahoma bombing) could be taken to mean - via norwegian 'voldtar' = 'rapes' - something like 'rapes rape honour-son'. But that is precisely the name of CIA chiefs since about 1977 - when they seem to have denoted the complex around Rekustad and Hauge farm with Simon Walther Hauge.
This suggests: 1) Al Qaida is a CIA project (including the terror in Iraq, that could mean), and 2) they plan to coup the power of the world by way of US state terrorism by way of my role - which seems to be the role of world economy in the Labråten construction of Himmler's death camps (Aktion Reinhard). (By the way, did Heydrich also live in Labråten?)
I add the name of third man in Al Qaida, Said al-Masri, which suggests the swearing I reportedly produced after having hit myself in my head with the 'elly axe' at the mountain farm in the summer of 1976. 'Alm' = german for 'mountain farm' = norwegian 'setra'. 'Made al sas-ri' = 'made by your sister'? It seems to be a CIA project to claim that my work is not my own. The story from the mountains of 1976 could be about a CIA plan of crediting me with a murder of Mao. Which would be a lie.
The second in Al Qaida is perhaps peculiar in the way he resembles Mikhail Gorbatchov. Which means that it could have been about Gen.1.21 - and perhaps Venice. I don't know if this is enough reason to let me associate Mario Zorzetto with Simon Walther Hauge in some sense of it or other. Zorzetto did use to have two bottles of water standing on the threshold to his door in Pedrocchi.
Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida was credited with the attack on Manhattan and USA on 11 September 2001. But that could mean that it was CIA who was running an attempted coup. It could even more be about an attempt to escalate for a bombing of Venice - for starting a vietnamization of Italy and for setting a Black Sea Loop going. That 'black sea' could even have been contained in the oil leak in the mexican gulf.
My guess is that Venice is only a pretext Jar connection and that the real Jar connection remains in Norway. Which could mean that CIA plans to bomb Venice - and invite the venetians to join the fantastic project.
But this could be precisely the wellington in the comment from Lenin as I passed the 'brickworks play' in Geliu Gatve 6 in Vilnius - the one about Biedgo and the wellington underneath. This 'Pawel Biedgo' could be a 'pawel bridge-go' between Pedrocchi and Barnaba - for the concept of 'genocide'. It was here that I passed a tourist who reminded me of John McLaughlin, the magician with a career as CIA chief.
The wellington could thereby be Italy - and Napoleon's Waterloo. It is many years (the eighties) since I for my inner view saw Hauge walking around at Rekustad farmhouse in his wellingtons. He told me (the mid seventies) that he would have wished for a more extensive career as a violinist but he was too 'bound to the earth' of his farm. He had studied ('welling-tones'?) in Copenhagen and travelled 'by thumb' to get there.
German president up to 2010 was Horst Köhler - a name with an impressive spoon resembling 'gor i stövler' = 'walks in wellingtons'. Could be that has some effect on USA.
Berendsohn had a wife (swedish 'fruntimmer' = 'woman') called Dorothea (cp. Dorothea Zimmermann who sent 127 communications to Sachs from about 1960 up to her death in 1970). There is a photo of Berendsohn and Sachs on the front page of the interesting book on 'Klartext'.
If the association of Sachs with CIA and Al Qaida and e.g. terror in Iraq comes to be consolidated, then there could be only a small step to the final conclusion that Sachs was an agent for Adolf Hitler and published the poetry under her name which he had written. It may be that the plans for launching such a hilarious version of the story is perhaps not so very far into the future. It could be a main goal for the CIA strategy. And the plan for Celan could be that his poetry was written by Mengele - and for my case it seems to be that they plan to design me as a 'dirty beast'. For example, when Timothy McVeigh was arrested in 1995 by a 'Charlie Hanger' for driving without licence plates, it could be about engineering the idea that I had murdered the two neighbours Zuin and Zorzetto in Pedrocchi (next to me and right under, only a few metres from the bridge - cp. the 1957 film about 'Kwai') in Venice and the even weirder idea that I had eaten Zuin - which would have been a non-licenced plate. Could be they work systematically on me in that manner - they could even have agents who do carry out such uncivilized acts for swapping with me - and store the innermost intrigues with a high secrecy classification in their archives to be opened to the public after only a hundred year or so. And what a beast can be revealed then! The world should claim that all these gloomy 'projects' of international secret service (controlled by UK/US administration) be packed down and the character of them be disclosed to the public.
Genetics and administration once again
It seems that the story as seen from administrative logic is contained in the predicted withdrawn shape of my chin - as if there should have been more bodily matter there if administrative power had not had its effect on my physiognomy. This could be contained in the principle of taxation which could be under elaboration in modern states - if I represent the economic principles as a 'walking ad for nazism' percolating through the 'generative grammars' of social and political structure, then taxation could perhaps be recognized as this part of my body which did not develop. It could have been this which happened in 2002 when my money ran out and I had to leave Vilnius and I decided to go to France and apply for political asylum. I had spoken with the embassy there and it was probably easy to guess my plan - when Ingrid Betancourt was abducted on 23 february 2002, Tone Gröver's birthday. 'Inngrep i tanker' = 'control with thoughts', 'in-grip in thoughts' - as if the taxation which would come to apply to my income at the end of the year when I got a pension and afterpayment for more than a year in December 2002 would come to be taxed in France - and the pension was taxable there. In many countries, such a pension is tax free but in France it is not. It delivered my tax return there in I think early march or later february 2003 - which was one year after Betancourt. What happened shortly after I had read the newspiece was that a strange numbness started to spread through the lefthand side of my body - and it grew so bad in the first days that I could hardly walk and could not use my left hand for a number of weeks. It is still there now and then when I am stressed - for example if I am in such a condition and put my left hand in my pocket I cannot feel the difference between the spectacles and a notebook there. The peculiar thing is that this happened one year before I delivered the tax return. I understood this relation to the tax return only recently when I should send a letter to the tax office in Venice who had informed me - as did also the CAF = Centro Assistenza Fiscale - that I should not deliver a tax return with my incomes this year. I sent a letter, though, an included a tax return which they could use just in case there should be a call for it, otherwise they could just look apart from it. The filling in of the form went not so bad and I was in good spirits when I sent it by the post, and then went home and had to take a nap. When I woke up I was completely lamed in my soul - as if I tried to step through an iron wall when I tried to get out of the bed. I said to myself that maybe this was only the effect of the whitsun celebrations going on - and at least it would have to go down since I could not function at all. It did last more or less for 2-3 days - I could start in the morning and function in the beginning, but was exhausted after short time. It is possible that they put the tax return aside when they got it - and that is why this strange condition went down again (if it had not then I would not have been able to function, I believe). It was then that I discovered that this could have been the story also from France in 2003 - when it started one year in advance! It started when I had decided to travel into the taxation zone, so to speak, and the law would apply to my income which I would get only many months later. There could of course have been aspects of this which applied to the story of Susan Sontag (chapter 6). The principle would have been this role of mine as a 'percolation of nazism' through administrative structure by way of the historic role of Treblinka - coupled with claims from administration that my chin did not develop as it otherwise would have done if administrative effects had not applied to it. Could be there are other aspects of my body as well which are affected by this program of Hitler. I recall a classmate of mine in the late 1960's who asked me after a gym lesson how it could be that my penis was longer than normal? I don't know if he could have been cued by his parents or otherwise could have sensed the theme. I had no answer to that, but it may be that the administration applied to my genetic relations in 1970 and that I did not develop into the biggest gurkha in town. Could be administration would claim responsibility for the development - I don't know if that is the case, nor do I know much about the topic although I believe that I am not a complete scandal - but cases of terror such as the massacre by the crown prince of Nepal in 2001 or 'Denver, Littleton' ('-je'?) could in theory apply to such a claim from administration. Could be many of these massacres - Zug, Nanterre, Erfurt etc - could be about this theme. In which case it could have been about the murder of my two genetic parents and the move from the west to the east of the country a few days before my 13th birthday, followed by school dentistry etc. The foot-and-mouth disease in England in 1967 started in Oswestry. There is also the possible aspect of 'norwegian semantics' to this complex, a sort of 'viking' theme it could be - which really could be about the effect of british fraud on historic documents if the vikings never really existed (but were made up by a british intrigue in e.g. the 18th century) but has come nevertheless to be a defining part of norwegian self-esteem - the norwegian vikings once ruled the world from America to Konstantinopel, the entire NATO field of today that means - and national symbolism. Such a story could of course come to leave traces on 'norwegian cognition' (by 'inngrep i tanker', so to speak) in the gap between fact and fiction as far as history is concerned, and the british plan could be to govern the world through this norwegian ladder ('erste-zweite-dritte Reich'?). 'Denver Littleton' could be such a rod for activating the 'norwegian' feelings of 'Gimsöy, Lofoten' ('gim-söy' = 'naked ewe', 'lo-foten' = 'the wooly foot'), the alleged home town of Sigurd Jensen (and most other people, perhaps), the official father of John Jensen, as a counterpoint to the ewes of Jacob with his rod technology. In addition, the outlines of Norway on the map resemble an erect penis - and hence national identities and 'semantics' on this topic could come to apply to the potentially important aspect of Vietnam being similar to Norway on the map - but 180 degrees around the globe.
The problem for me is of course that if it was the taxation in France which left me rather disabled, could be even more or less permanently, it means that I cannot really earn more money than my tax-free pension nor can I thrive in a country where it is taxable. (In fact I left France rather soon after having delivered the tax return, although I believed that it was for other reasons). It is possible that politics dreams about making use of such principles in taxation issues for controlling the thoughts of the people. Could be smoking is a way of getting those parts under individual control which administration otherwise could occupy by such means, and that is why administration forbids smoking in so many places nowadays? Or, rather, poetry is that healthy alternative to political power. The abduction of Ingrid Betancourt could have been for such claims. It would be about the difference between the physiognomy which genetics (microcosmic) has determined and what administration (macrocosmic, by calendarial telescopes etc) has determined, and the claim of administration would be that administration is stonger than genetics. This is of course trivial - and if one administers too little food to a child then it becomes smaller than its genetics would suggest. I also believe that if I were mistreated by e.g. chemicals in my infancy, that would have left traces on my body. But if the administration does not apply to the material nourishment but only to political factors, then british administration may feel that they have solved the problem of 'transubstantiation'. The problem is of course that this strategy does not really solve any problems - it only reduces the problem of spiritual freedom to a matter of a rolling pin for flattening out the world. The freedom of the spirit should of course not really be dependent on the development of the body.
Brief conclusion
The conclusion to the whole book: The nazis won the war and have been consolidating their positions since then. It must be written into the school books that Hitler was an agent for England and that the holocaust was a british concern - if that is the story, and indeed it seems to be. Historic inquiry must speed up its critical studies of the phenomenon and stop being a propaganda organ for nazi interests. Instead of letting fascism develop again in Italy under the pressure of the prospects of a bombing of the country by NATO (and Kosovo 1999 could have been a test run of the model, with Belgrade and the chinese embassy as suggestive of potential targets in Rome), one should pronounce in explicit wordings what the story and the reasonings are - and then people do not have to be pushed into false and subconscious and irrational conclusions. The 20th century history can be summed up like this: Every day of it was the one and only big headline news that Russia had still not told the truth, and when after more than 70 years it was found that the truth was not yet told, one could pack down the whole communism - which the people of the world desperately had fought for - for the one and only reason of having the truth told. Those 200.000 people following Liebknechts coffin probably were there for telling Liebknecht in the coffin of the need for telling the truth. This is still how it is - and politics has long since developed into the art of cheating the people and avoiding the truth. There probably never was a bigger error in history that Lenin's when he did not tell about the Klipra connection - and that is probably why he was shot in 1918. Since then the story has been all and only the masses supporting the leader whom they hope can tell them the truth - but since they don't know what they don't know, they have to continue the search untill somebody does. This is still the only newspiece every day: That Russia has still not told it and still respects the british claims to genocide as a human right. One finally concluded that there was no reason to continue the historic mistake of communism - which only served to allow the british symbolic logic to take over the control with the development of new knowledge. This enormously tragic story is a story of helplessness. It should have been considered a crime against humanity and an insult against human reasoning to believe that the historic truth can harm anybody or that it is 'unpolite' to tell the truth of history. It is a serious mistake to keep vital information back from the knowledge of the people. It is not enough that the administration knows it. But it seems that every politician since 1814 has gone in the trap of the 'british trick' - which tells that a truly revolutionary politician first and foremost knows the art of keeping the mouth shut about vital information - and thereby he gains power by cheating his own people. This history seems to be - rather than the general development of a new level of information technology - a matter of a misunderstanding based on the collapse of the dogma of transubstantiation in England - with the subsequent development of a symbolic logic which has turned out to be a possible albeit very unfortunate sort of logic, in particular since it blunts the sense of ethics and esthetics and truth generally and lands reality on a paperflat symbolic level of permutation and manipulation. This new symbolic logic - which led to the modern information technology - took the place which poetic logic should have been granted from about 1850 onwards, under the umbrella of the blossoming of jewish (jewish-'genetic', as could be the story relative to the 'british trick') culture in Europe, and this means that pederasty, cannibalism and genocide are the fundamental constituting parametres of the digital computer - the epistemological interface which gives meaning to this technology and which corresponds to the old testament mythology for the alphabetic technology. It is probably a wellknown analysis to see the old testament myths as being generated from the three-consonant hebrew roots running through all combinatorial possibilities (a turnaround variant of the 'grace machine' of St.Peter) and thereby outputting the basic material of the old testament stories - I don't have any opinion on that (in particular, it is a mistake to believe that the jewish era of the 19th century was a period of blossoming of an alphabetic culture - rather the opposite) but clearly these old-testamental mythological stories seem to have been established at the same time as the alphabet was constructed, while pederasty, cannibalism and genocide seem to be the modern pendant for the new information technology. That is when it could be urgently important to start the development of poetic logic. The failure of poetic logic to succeed - and the epistemological failure of the british logic which has succeeded - is a grandiose tragedy indeed.
In my novel 'The Dreamer' (1994-95), about the form of place, I think I have solved the problem of literary transcendence (what the manipulative-chomskyan factor in the british-symbolic logic is a misunderstanding of), and in my poetic work 'The Endmorgan Quartet' (1997-2008), about the form of time, I think I have solved the problem of esthetic 'transubstantiation'. Clearly modern nazism does not want these works to come out - but I hope the works can be published one day.
But it goes without saying that my person has not got a chance anywhere unless somebody helps me. If I send a manuscript to a publisher, it is rejected before the envelope reaches them, and returned half a year later with pretext reasons, while a jungle of similar names, titles, themes are published in the mean time. And then much is gained for the administative intrigue. It is of course also possible that I am under surveillance and that one knows which postbox I drop a letter in and that all my electronic interface is surveyed. Nor do I know if post to me has been censored through the recent decades.
The original 5000 pages will be converted into a representation on paper and CD in austrian legal deposit under the title "The website material 2009-2010". There are already the 'The website material 2004-2007' in austrian legal deposit and 'The website material 2008' in italian legal deposit. These thousands of pages contain a lot of material which I worked myself through in an attempt to come to grips with the present story and probably add little to the final version which I have reached now in 2010 and therefore they have only marginal interest for the ordinary reader.
© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 8 september 2010
Last updated 10 september 2010
