Introductory remark

Introductory remark

John Bjarne Grover

For a brief and convincing summary of the historic evidence of a political mythos role assigned to my person, see this file on the essential 'Evidence'. It is recommended reading. Much of the material in this article is mentioned here and there elsewhere on this web page.

For a brief and I think relevant summary of the story, see this file.

In addition to normal homepage stuff, this website contains material which I have to make available for the public on the background of the possible political history which seems to assign a mythological role to me.

Briefly, the story which I have reconstructed on my own as well as I can (it therefore necessarily can be seen to be somewhat speculative) seems to be that the austrian Adolf Hitler, who of course could have been the genetic son of jews, was replaced with a british 'Paul Marshall' (as I guess the name) in 1918 - the socalled attempt on Lenin in 1918 outside the Michelson factories was a way of telling the world about this - and the socalled 'Hitler government' could well have been britons all of them. 'The Beatles' seem to be about this 'british Hitler'. I am probably genetic son of Nelly Sachs and Paul Celan, who was born Paul P.Antschel, and my role has been to be a representation of that Marshall-Hitler. When Paul Celan probably was murdered on Hitler's birthday in 1970 and buried on the day when Sachs died, a day which also was my official mother's birthday, it could have been a british rejection of the jewish genetics which was the other side of Marshall. I was over 50 before I discovered that I could be the genetic father of some famous people in music, acting etc (and then one would perhaps add the element that my childhood and youth could have included some hampering and editing of the growth of my body, for the purposes of the political intrigue). The question then remains why are these not rejected (if the strategy is to reject my authorship)? The answer could of course be that the intrigue was invented before the genetic labs were, and even if the british periodical Modern Language Review, which is financed by the british government and seems to encode the whole mythos story since 1905 in its undertext, suggests my name as genetic father for many of these (in the issue immediately before their birth, seemingly in title 3 or 4), there was of course traditionally only the man with the last hand on the bottle who really knew. That is Labour power. The names of the home towns of mine during childhood up to 13 (Molde. Oslo, Hammerfest, Odda, Molde, Volda, Molde) encode the complex with Marshall and the two jewish parents ('Leonie Sachs' seems to mean 'de[t] on[d]es akse' = 'the axis of evil', cp. George Bush with this concept, for an L/D which is 'Hammerfest' = 'Lon[e]' and 'Odda' = 'Don', for telling that Marshall was a briton) - before we moved to Fredrikstad, first Kongensgate 8 and then eventually into 'Labråten', which could be telling of a genetic lab-rotten. Why this? It is probably not really about lab-rotten - but the construction could be about a way of lending power to british Labour and its iota'n - in extension from the Kennedy assassination 1963.

This intrigue which would tell that it be all and only about collecting power for England by way of the Hitler-Marshall construction could serve as a cover only for the deeper intrigue of making an esoteric clan out of british Labour for ruling the world in an upper class of high priests. This can serve as an indication that a vaccine against AIDSHIV existed before the epidemic was set in circulation - and that Labour bosses etc were vaccinated in order to be the esoteric inner circle, some sort of high priests with bizarre means for 'moral education', such as the abuse of the natural prohibition against incest for a divide-and-conquer on the arms of the nose-trunk female against the ears of the man-on-wagon? (Would 'thalidomid' be a solution? could have been the intrigue which prompted the popular response that it could not). Only then would the epidemic count as real mass murder, otherwise it could have been an accident only. I think it is time to release the vaccine and stop the epidemic - if it exists. The concept of 'Labour-rotten' would add to 'lab-rotten' as an alternative cover for a deeper interest in 'labour-iotan'. Clearly that means that it is the concept which counts and can have been launched whether a vaccine exists or not. (I notice also that it was the 'League of Nations' - fore-runner to UN - in Geneva who sent Quisling on his mission to Russia in january 1924).

The essential aspect of this story is then that my authorship may be rejected by angloamerican intrigue because they (also for harvesting ignorant popular support) want to reject Adolf Hitler - who never came to any far-reaching career in the arts he dreamt of - and accept 'Paul Marshall' - whose political career included WWII and the holocaust - and to dump the blame for the historic disasters on me. But clearly this could be only a pretext as a cover for the deeper upper-class aspirations of an esoteric british Labour for the role of the 'leapyear' rabbi-t-s in the global 1000-year cycle of the blue metre - cp. 'Miliband' as the Labour leader since 2010 - could be for aspirations of a global government.

It is possible that a role of mine of a dumping place for bad british histories could include not only tragic WWII story of Hitler and a potential british 'double' of him, but it may be that they could have planned to add other tragic mistakes of theirs to the list for 'turn-around' purposes (which could be contained in the family name of 'Eidsvig' - the official name of my official grandparents) - such as apparently artificial earthquakes of partly great disastrous impact, or ordinary political terror, possibly including the Al Qaida story, or cultural swindle of various forms, such as literary fraud. I am not a swindler and I do not intend to carry the burden of the historic mistakes which the britons or americans could have made. My work is authentically mine. The label of 'dirty beast in the revelation' is something which could have been pasted on me even before my birth and must be considered an intrigue only.

I add the important information that I am not an agent and have never been an agent. I consider myself a poet, and secret agency is totally alien to a serious poet.

In addition to the main articles on the front page, including the unfinished sketch called the 'ABC', there are articles on these matters under 'Some stories'.

Some info:

1) I am not an agent, neither secret nor overt.
2) I am authentically the one I was when I was born and have not been replaced with another - at least since my first memory from probably march 1958, age 8 months.
3) I have not got any data from secret or classified sources.
4) I am the authentic author of my literary and scientific work and of what is written on this website, at least in the form it had when I put it out on the internet.