Spin-doctorism and the Orderud Paust case

Spin-doctorism and the Orderud Paust case

John Bjarne Grover

After Napoleon, who could have been a british agent, and after Heimskringla on Pope, the british intrigue probably focussed on Denmark with its long northern branch. In early 1814, the danes granted jews full civilian rights and the norwegians broke out of the 'union' and declared a Norway free of jews. It could have been on the conditions of England that Norway should be 1) a 'Nowhere' and 2) be antisemitic - as part of the anglican strategy on the Vatican.

This lasted unto roughly 1850 after Grassmann when the british intrigue hijacked the project with the two-dimensional binary-valued symbolisism of de Morgan and Boole and could have sent Ole Devold to Nowhere for 'setting up shop' = opening a tricotage factory there (the 'Kaufleute' = 'canaanist' merchants could be the concept - later in the headhunter photo?). This allowed for a continuation of the antisemitism vestiged in the framework of the Ole Devold premises - which developed into the Klipra connection. Via Laura Devold, Adolf Hitler and all those unto me as 1) genetic child of jews and 2) growing up in the family of nazis. This would allow Norway - squeezed between the Soviet Union and NATO - to 1) reject me because of my genetics and hence retain the fundamental antisemitism required by angloamerican NATO for a continued existence of Norway and 2) direct their indignation-trembling finger at me as the octogonian alleged nazi-son, for pleasing the russians with an anti nazi attitude. Which means that the state of 'Nowhere' feels secure and safe as long as they can reject me - which could be the reason for a 'paranoid schizophrenia' concept on me and my wish throughout my life for being outside Norway. If they took an EEG of me in Norway in 1999 or perhaps even 1982, I suppose it could have looked like a normal split-brain due to this massively lateralized national political inability to understand the real story and the need for a scapegoat to squeeze out in order to diminish the overpressure from east and from west. After a decade abroad I feel much better.

This construction is probably Double Morals of England. It is the same double morality which could have allowed for an undertext announcement of the nazi deaths camps in Modern Language Review even before the orders to make them were given by Hitler in Germany.

This phenomenon again could be the essence of the Orderud Paust case which could consist in two parts:

1) Per Paust (officially dead on 6 may 1999) for the pausing of a peer such as Ragin Esther Wenk-Wolff. If she is my genetic sister ('sösteren'), this could have been the reason for the pausing of the peer. It could be the reason for e.g. the Palme murder.

2) Anne Orderud Paust (officially dead on 22 may 1999) = an order you'd paused = an explanation to the mystery how it could be that England apparently announced Treblinka and the other death camps in MLR undertext even before the order to make them was given by Himmler. The explanation to the mystery is called 'an order you'd paused': Himmler first made the order with his collaborators in his office but then 'paused' it for a while to give the office a chance to clarify things and sort out details before the order could be presented publically to those who would be concerned, and in the mean time the order was communicated by spies to british administration who hurried up and printed them as undertext in MLR before the order surfaced in the public reality in Germany. Ah, I understand, so that is the reason why it was first in England and only later in Germany. But wasn't this too much of an hazard for the british spies in Himmler's office? Absolutely not: Himmler was just thrilled about the joke - then the britons would be blamed for the atrocities! But then how come the britons bit the hook so easily? Ah, I understand - it was Himmler's own strategy: He quite simply outsmarted them. Should we believe this?

Norwegian PM Bondevik was a patient in the mental hospital called Modum Bad Sanatorium in I think the summer 1999 or thereabout. In the mean time his deputy Anne Enger Lahnstein was chief of three ministeries (PM, oil and culture) and had a lot of power untill the bombings of Moscow in september 1999 after which she retired from politics. I have computed that my 1994-95 novel 'The Dreamer', which I believed was well locked down and out of reach for anybody, could have been the template for these bombings in Moscow and much other terror around that time. If so, it could have been the strategy to blame my authorship for the terror. It was after I in early november 2008 had found the Talmud Erubin parallelisms to my novel - the same fragments as in The Endmorgan Quartet books 13-16 - that there was a terror attack on jewish installations in Mumbai in India on 26 nov 2008 and Israel attacked Gaza in Christmas. (I must add that I have not arrived at conclusive proof of the role of my novel in the public data - nor have I invested much work in such a search - but would consider it a probable theory and there were some reasons to believe that it had been the case - cp. also the apparent largescaled and possibly organized plagiarisms - in some sense of it - on the book).

Clearly if this story be taken in the sense of Helene Grimaud being a propaganda machine for the nazi extermination program, not the least via names of Treblinka chiefs etc, it is of course a problem for herself and her art. It would be another form of typical divide-and-conquer on the intellectuals. I do not believe that she is involved in the propaganda nor in intrigues against e.g. Ragin Wenk-Wolff. Neither am I.

Now the conclusion to this is that the state of Norway may feel that it can keep itself up and going by way of rejecting me - and perhaps, even worse, by a continued nazi persecution policy. That clearly is a misunderstanding and the vast majority of the world's population will certainly feel that it is right to bring an end to this even if some power-holders could feel that a continued global spread of angloamericanism through an antisemitic norwegian prism is the right thing. It is much better to pack down the so far official version of the early history from viking times if those were fabrications from e.g. british administration.

Anglomericanism in this sense of it is the british war against the Vatican since Henry VIII, and the construction of my role and the function of Treblinka - could be the whole Klipra connection since Ole Devold etc - could be for precisely the reason of making it possible to exterminate the Vatican with a 'goodenough' reason for anglican England to survive it. Those smart intrigues should not be continued. The Vietnam war and the two Gulf wars - not to talk of the holocaust - could have been parts of the construction which should serve to end up as a 'goodenough' reason.

It is just to describe history as it is - and then the reason will never be 'goodenough' and thereby there is no need to continue the tragic farce - not the least since the only 'goodenough' reason could come to be the other way round.

From my 'Website material 2004-2007' p. 390, on the turbulences around Anne Enger Lahnstein's resignation in 1999): "Lahnstein resigned on a Friday and Peter Mandelson, who had been out of politics after Christmas 1998 when I self-published my 'Cardiff/Harding' to British legal deposit (some days before Christmas). He resigned allegedly due to some dubious money dispositions. There was a photo of him on the front page of The Times, looking somewhat like Mao in the river. The reports were reminiscent of my text 'The grand moral worpet-swum' from the book. Now after Lahnstein resigned on a Friday, he was jolted back again into Blair's government on the following Monday. It turned out that the money dispositions were not so dubious after all".

I think this christmas 1998 was the time when there was talk of 'spin-doctorism' in The Times and similar publications. The doctorism could have been the formula 'on a political basis' by the rejection of my PhD dissertation by the bombings of Dar-es-Salaam, Nairobi and Omagh in the summer 1998, and the 'spin' could in principle be the half-integer spin of the neutrinos - for the sensational news of 2011 that neutrinos had travelled faster than the speed of light. As I have shown in my article on poetic logic, these news - unless they are factual and without any element of swindle - could have been abused for a fabricated pretext for inviting the whole world to join England in the bombing of Italy and the Vatican since this swastika 'fold-over' of Norway down on Italy would appear to be the only way that one could construct a technology for information transfer faster than the speed of light - and thereby one could break the informational isolation of Earth in the universe. The pretext says that we must bomb the Vatican for getting Earth out of the informational encapsulation. Of course such a british strategy would be a pretext only for precisely the opposite - it would be for the british interests of stopping the further progress of grassmannian high-dimensional poetic logic and technology. This is precisely what the 'John Grover' intrigue from 1843 = 1844 = 1845 is about - that is even the name of my name - and it could even be that the 'dirty beast' in this sense of it is the reason for the construction of neutrino theory - which could be based even on 'weak semantic forces' - cp. also my concept of 'submorphemic signification' which could have been the background of the bombing of Oklahoma and the earthquake of Sendai if that were an underearth bomb. This means that the ultimate british interest in a war against Italy and the Vatican could be to stop the progress of high-dimensional poetic logic. It is very high time to bring these intrigues to an end. Why such giant intrigues if the purpose is to tell that logic always has to fall down on the two dimensions of a bordereau paper?

I add that when Spindlegger took over the leadership in ÖVP in Austria last year, Schwarzenegger came to Austria and spent some time with 'sportsen' bicycling around the country. I don't remember if this was before or after the news from CERN on neutrinos with overlight speed.