No hole in the head

No hole in the head

John Bjarne Grover

There seems to exist some mythos story telling that I, some time in the first half of the eighties probably, was drugged and raped by a big dog who was shot in its brain in the moment of its ejaculation, after which it fell down on my body. One guesses that the dog was called 'Charles de Gaulle' or something like that, for whatever reason - such as the story of the 32nd attempt and hence the links to Al Qaida.

When I once went by a night train there entered in the sleeping couchette also a person (not Gordon Brown!) with a big square suitcase which looked like it contained medical equipment. I fell asleep and woke up some hours later - the person was gone and I later found that the ideas came around that they had drilled a hole in my skull for depressurizing. I went to a brain scan institute who could confirm that my skull was intact.

The political program seems to be to swap the roles of me and the dog in the sodo rape mythos, and then the hole in the skull would be not in the dog but in me if anybody has such holes at all. Frankly, I do not believe that any of the stories are much interesting. But it could be politically active, such as in Kursk & Cole etc.

There seems to be much terror which seems designed to imitate the idea of bullets shot through the opening of houses which could mean body orifices.

I have earlier discussed the possible role of 'natrium-wolframat' in the role of breaking down brain cell walls for letting the 'excremental bullet' leave its material impact on the DNA of the neurons. Then the idea is that the 'excrements' of the bullet or whatever comes out with the DNA of the dog's ejaculation. It would correspond to theories of extraction of 'combustibility' from the sulphur element in a 'lapis philosophorum' which sometimes is considered equivalent to Jesus Christ. Such theories of combustibility must be considered perverse if applied to circumstances of a sodo rape by dog etc. However, there could be corollaries to a theory of me being the genetic father to e.g. film actors and actresses - as if these thereby could serve as 'proof' of something.

The theory is that the history of modern 'service terrorism' started with a mass murder of the indians in the socalled 'american civil war', the history-writing of which must then have been of a dubious kind. The indians had not a script culture, as far a I know, and did not defend themselves against these 'official histories'. It is possible that soldiers were called out from north and south to murder so many indians that there were only a few dozen thousands left of them - and one can guess that there could have been millions of them before it started. The reason for these mass murders would have been that the americans felt that they did not have enough territorial rights to the country.

This - if there is a basis for the theory in the real world - is likely to be the background of the 'Klipra connection'. The modern political intrigues tries to claim that it was 'fire-water' that broke the indians down - like the bullet-of-ejaculation of the dog.

Are all traces of the real story wiped out - I mean, if it were that different? I looked briefly at the names of battles of the US civil war and think that it looked as if there were more of them meaning the front of the body than those meaning the 'end' - as if the 'endians' were losing? 'Charles Augustus Lindbergh' = 'civil US England US inbördes'? - as if the civil war was between Sweden and Norway? 'Guglielmo Marchese Marconi' could have been the first to cable the news across the Atlantic etc.

Now the falldown of the dog on my body - if that is the mythos - is likely to represent the two levels of the 'wigwam' piece of recursive matter - and the two levels of the skin - the upper and the lower level (I know little about this but believe that I have read something like that once upon a time). The swapping of roles which could be due to massive terror and media propaganda telling that there is a hole in my skull could then lead to massive itches due to the swap of the levels of the skin.

'Natrium-wolframat' reduces by way of 'atrium-olframat', 'trium-lframat' etc to an inner court of a city house.

My guess is that even the Gandhis of India could have been murdered for reasons of lending weight to this construction.

It is then the faith in the people of the world that there is a hole in my head which is the source of the itch and the power confusion following from it. I hereby pronounce that I do not believe that there is a hole in my head - and the brain scan confirmed that - and if there is a hole in a head, it could of course be in a dog's skull - or somebody else. The story could be old - like Lenin told of.

The purpose with the 'program' would be to let the upper level of the skin 'fall down' on the lower level of the skin and thereby lend justification to the american hopes of regaining integrity in their claims to the territory they live on - which once was indian territory.

Skin = norw. HUD
Dog = norw. HUND

'N' in 2nd-3rd position turns Austria into Anustria - hence the ROMPIS (homo) program. If 'homo' all over the world, the downfall of the HUND (dog) on HUD (skin) leads to apparent squeeze-out of the N (?) and all the 'Anustria' homos around the world is turned into Austria. That could be the ridiculous reason for the 'homo' programs: That it is a minature american program installed into Austria for turning their Bad Conscience (in the form of a Homo program) - such as the attempt on the pope in 1981? - into a new territorial integrity for USA.

A lot of dirty tricks, that would be.

Hence when Hitler came in Wolkenwagen and fell down, he came from Austria. All that Hitler story (world wars etc) could have been for engineering quasi territorial integrity in USA.

It means that the power of the international services would be the same as USA trying to gain authority to its territory.

Can the power of the international services be avoided? Are they justified in their role because USA do not have any chance at all to gain real integrity in their territorial claims?

The alternative is to tell the truth instead of generating power by secrets - and the truth-telling should have been the job of the international services. The services are dirty only as long as USA feel that they have no right to the country. If, however, there exist no other solution, then they can get it by truth instead of power. Having it by power means that they have no right to it, having it by truth that it is the only possible solution. Therefore downgrading all essential secrets is the only lasting solution.

However, it is possible that some rather will say that in order to gain authority to the american territory by way of swapping of upper and lower level of skin and wigwam etc and the itch following thereby, it is doubtful whether this can be achieved without the accompaniment from further pogroms - that this is the only lasting solution - since a little (or even rather much) itch and scratch cannot in itself return territorial rights to the country. The holocaust on the jews could have had that simple reason. Those who believe so are likely to consider it a part of a construction of a new Hitler - and that is badly illegal according to the austrian constitution.

There were some sounds from apparent shots in the corridor to the 'atrium-olframat' some years ago (or it could have been a tape-recording, of course, from e.g. shots on a dog or even from the murder of Indira Gandhi). There was a 'falldown' of an airplane in France recently soon after there had been some washing in a visible window frame ('atrium-olframat'?). These could be about 'threats' resembling relevance as far as holes in the head are concerned - and with enough such newspieces, people in general could come to believe that the hole is in my head and not in the dog's. It could be precisely that propaganda effect of the newspieces - turning such roles and holes around - that could be the driving motor in the construction of a new Hitler.

I don't think there are any abnormal holes in my head (e.g. covered with only a layer of skin - which would be very insecure). But of course the head could have been opened soon after my birth.

School shootings - to the extent that there are secret agents who shoot the children, such as in principle could have been the case with the indian who was blamed for the shooting in Seattle some time ago if it were only a copy who shot - could be for similar reasons - that the security of the school/skull is not as optimal as it should have been.

Gröver/'Mengele' once (or even more than once) told that there was a total abstainer (a priest, I think) called 'Skålnes' (Mr.Bowls, Mr.Cheers) who came from 'Ølen' (Beers) - the point being what was called an 'ihuga avholdsmann' (devote teetotaller), while 'i-hugga A-volds-mann' could mean that man who suddenly is attacked by a terrible itch between his thighs - where the crossbar of an 'A' goes between the knees or thighs - and who, due to such 'raskolnikovian' attacks of itch - inflicts violence on his own body or skin in pure self-scratch. I sometimes have a terrible eczema itch on the inner thighs down to the knees (which I think is normal for an eczema person) and there is the story from the 'unicornal' wood chopper in the mountains in the summer 1976. It is of course speculative to suggest that the story told by Gröver/'Mengele' meant that a 1-2-3 in early childhood could be the background of such A-itch in adult age. If the helmet is removed in early age it is of course a sort of 'hole in the head'.

In short, I think the integrity of my skull is okay and normal, at least in adult age.

(I made a draft to this article in the morning 2 april 2015)