Computation onto other realities

Computation onto other realities

John Bjarne Grover

My semiotic theory tells that there are two arbitrarities:

By my fundamental theorem of linguistics, the two 'x's are two metaphysical items in potentially two different realities, while the two 'y's are two physical items - the substance to the left that has derived from the collapse (conflation) of the two metaphysical items due to the limitations of the human spirit, the righthand 'y' is the linguistic label on the substance with an arbitrary relation between the two 'y's. The function of the arbitrarity of the righthand 'y' is to try and render a repair for the loss when the transcendent arbitrarity 'z' was lost in the collapse: This 'z' is the arbitrary difference between the two 'x's but the difference is ignored by the roughness and expediency of the human mind. Mystic inquiry strives towards restoring the integrity of the 'z' in order to regain truth in the realities we normally cannot or do not perceive, and therefore mystic inquiry is the only philosophical activity that can bring the epistemological state forwards in the development of the computer technology. Subjective integrity is a fundamental prerequisite for mysticism - untruthfulness in the relation to others, to the self of to the divine origin is completely alien to mystic inquiry.

Causality and logic are here considered to be offsprings from the reductionistic collapse by the conflation of the two 'x's - that is, from the loss of the 'z's. Logical proofs of God have been launched but have turned out to be not so interesting.

With the modern revolution of technology and sciences from about the mid 19th century, the efficiency with which science could master the laws of nature were about the same as the efficiency with which the 'z's were erased - and with that the blunting of the human spirituality and awareness of 'other realities'. It is assumed that philosophical materialism was launched in order to try and rescue the integrity of the human spirituality by a systematic turning around of the physics (the 'y's) and the metaphysics (the 'x's). This made it possible to track and prove the existence of the 'z's in the physics - which means that the higher efficiency of the developing science and mathematics inevitably would have to stumble across the evidences of the human spirituality.

[25/1-2025: The classic example of traces of the 'z' in matter - which probably was unknown at the time when philosophical materialism took shape - would be quantum physics wherein a material piece of substance can be assumed to exist on two different places simultaneously - as two 'x's, that is - which means that physics and metaphysics are turned around - as seen within the framework of my fundamental theorem of linguistics: See this account of the question of qubits and quantum physics. The difficulties with finding out from western sources what quantum physics is about resembles perhaps the similar problems with finding a good definition of an electronic transistor: I believed that it was a thresholding device that sends the current one way if a parametre in the incoming impulse transcends a certain threshold, otherwise it goes another way. But this simple account I cannot find anywhere among the sources I consulted on the web].

It is here assumed that it is possible to see Lenin's death in january 1924 in combination with Hitler's 'Beer Hall Putsch' in 1923 in such a way that Hitler's coup led to a 'turned-around' reality in the west. Hitler probably considered the russian revolution to be an offspring from the Madonna of Fatima's message to the young visionaries on 13 october 1917 - she said that 'Russia has to turn around' - and some took this to be the 'reason' for the outbreak of the russian revolution some days later, in november 1917. Hitler was 'in the cell' of 'Landsberg Gefägnis' when Lenin died - if he were shot, it could have been for creating the idea that a 'sperm' of 'divine' lead was planted into this 'heart of the revolution' which thereby meant the Madonna from Heaven - and when Hitler wrote his 'Mein Kampf' in this cell, where he served a sentence for the 'Beer Hall Putsch', he was the Jesus child who was born through this literary struggle for freedom. He was therefore, as this political mythology would go, the Jesus child in whom the western world had put their confidence - and this is likely to be the reason why the western world believes in terror: They still believe that Hitler is Jesus (and the interest in religious matters has naturally been deteriorating in the decades since then). Hitler's 'zweite Reich' could have been an attempt to turn the roles between himself and a 'Jesus'. This is the turn-around that is the problem in the west, including the apparent 'nazi madonna' program of NATO. Cookies on the internet (a request when opening a page) are apparently mainly for this 'nazi madonna' program - they are very widespread in the west but less frequent in the east - such as this chinese news channel or this russian one (or e.g. this one), while e.g. this german site, this french site or this italian site requires either payment or you can get it gratis against allowing for cookies. Accepting cookies probably means that you accept the 'nazi madonna' program. Another example was Disney's Business cartoon 'Donald Duck' launched a few years after Lenin's death - if Lenin were shot by a bullet it was, this logic could tell, because he did not 'duck' for the 'donor's bullet - therefore it was his own fault and he had only himself to blame, which could be the propaganda purpose with 'Donald Duck': It lends a shade of legitimacy to Hitler's coup. As another example, in this turned-around world, terror is used for enhancing sales of products. That sounds very strange, doesnt it? It can be assumed that the western world is an entire big paradox developed from Hitler's coup - the western reality believes that it is in the middle of a grandiose Jesus-revolution while in actual fact it is a terrible backwater from that Hitler coup.

It is in the 'dritte Reich' that Hitler probably had planned to enter into a full Jesus recognition - as a 'Juden-Führer'.

It is this coup which ran off with the program of materialism - the attempt to try and rescue the human spirituality - when Hitler ran off with the spirituality of Jesus in this paradoxical ('Jesus terror') format, the materialist paradox of proving the spirituality in the matter was turned into a grimace which the west could not understand and it therefore came to look like the opposite of what it was intended for. Because of Hitler's coup the materialist philosophies came to look like the attempted negation of the human spirituality and not the confirmation of it. It could be that the 'cookie' program on the internet is an attempt to keep this confusion up and going.

It is well possible that this confusion was a part of the reason why Russia dismantled the Soviet Union around 1990.

It is also possible that this is the problem of the west when it tries to push its 'colour revolutions' eastwards. (Could be 'colour' means the hopes that the spectral transform of the Time of History shall lead to a clarification of these deep confusions).

The deep confusion means a disastrous loss of integrity - since faith in a terrorist Jesus necessarily has to lead to serious confusions. It does not help the west to point to 'jihadist philosophies' in the arab countries as a source of this confusion - that is likely to lead to only less integrity.

If, as I have suggested, integrity is one of the factors that are necessary in order to compute on 'spiritual substance', that is, computation in a logical space without electric conductors, it is possible that the west is seriously disabled relative to the former communist countries when it comes to advanced technology. The deep confusion can probably make such computation impossible - at least untill the confusion is cleared out. Examples could be the russian 'Oreshnik' missile which it seems that no western military technology can stop, and my analysis of the bombing of the Okhmatdyt children's hospital (in july 2024) in combination with the assumed swindle story from 'SOS Barnebyer' in probably the 1970's - which leaves a systematic hole in the integrity which can make it difficult for scientists to compute on the 'logical substance' without meeting serious problems. My story about the 1999 death of the sturgeon Nikita (a donation from Nikita Khrustchov in the 1960's) could tell the same. It means that under such circumstances it is not really possible for the west to spy on the technological developments in e.g. Russia and 'simply do the same' - it is probable that the computer quite simply will not function if it suffers from short circuitry in the substance of integrity.

Such a machine functions by way of the cognitive substance created by the faculty of faith - precisely where Hitler deceived the western world. As long as terror still enhances the sales of products and political programs, this confusion continues.

The transistor of this computational device will have the choice of sending the impulse (which comes in from the righthand 'y' as a symbolic-semantic unit, say, with a certain electric charge) onto the lefthand 'y' (a physical substance) and from there either to the lefthand or to the righthand 'x' (metaphysical units of computation), which means either reaching the 'z' or not - even if the two 'x's are metaphysical only. Then how can they be considered the basis for computation? By integrity in the faculty of faith, which is a precondition for mystic inquiry. It is this integrity which can preserve the 'reality' of the 'z' - which was the original program of the materialist philosophies - and which Hitler's coup tried to erase for making it possible to take the lefthand 'x' for the righthand and thereby also to make Hitler (as 'born' from the cell of Landsberg prison) be taken for Jesus and vice versa. It is because there is a real difference between the left- and righthand 'x's (as far as the 'z' is concerned) that such computation is possible - if the needed integrity exists. If the needed integrity does not exist, say, if the culture wherein the computer is constructed and is intended to function increases the sales of Bibles by way of terror, then there is no difference between the two 'x's.

Terror can scare people off from their spiritual functionality (the 'z') and thereby it seems from the viewpoint of Hitler that terror enhances the swap-potentiality of the two 'x's. That increases the swindle factor (such as 'efficiency in science') but it very seriously destroys the logical computability in the 'spiritual substance'.

Materialism tried to conceive of the spirit as detectable in substance (by turning physics and metaphysics around) and thereby has an advantage when it comes to work with 'spiritual substance' as the basis for logical computation. Hitler's coup tried to drain this computational advantage by erasing the 'z' by way of terror (such as the holocaust), which, though, cannot be anything but an ostrich's defence strategy.

It can be emphasized, of course, that materialism which denies the spirituality isnt much worth in such a context. It is the materialism which intended to rescue the spirituality from Hitler's coup of Jesus which can be a solution. That is the materialism which insists on the presence and importance of recognizing the 'z' against abusive cultural strategies.

I have repeatedly been puzzled by the apparent phenomenon that it seems that norwegian-affiliated policy or 'trend' at least against me seems to be paradoxical in a similar way: If I have produced something that seems to be of value for the society and its culture, the response seems to be attempts to counter it so that it looks less interesting or original. (If the wildfires at Los Angeles were deliberate arson, they could in principle have been such a response to my article 'An antenna to other realities'. And how will the present article be met - will there come a negative offprint of it in the news?). Why? Could be the pretext ideology would be to try and turn the turned-around reality around to what it should have been. Clearly the 'spectrum' arising therefrom could come to resemble a jungle of confusion only.

If this is the nature of the socalled 'colour revolutions', it is clearly not the way to go. It is possible that such a 'colour revolution' can come to constitute a drawback for advances in the development of computational technologies.

My fundamental theorem of logic is based on the difference between element and category. The origin of all the above-mentioned problems could be seen to be the assumed existence of the 'z' and the erasure of it for the sake of efficiency and simplicity. That only means that the question is posed: Is the righthand element 'x' a member of the category 'X' like the lefthand is? Clearly it is, says a human deficiency logic, and hence the two 'x's are considered 'the same'. This is therefore the locus of the problem - which hopefully can be solved by the non-euclidean logic which I have postulated - and which consists in erasure of Euclid's fifth common notion which tells that 'the whole is always bigger than the part'. By a non-euclidean logic one can postulate a sum of probabilities deviating from 1.0 and thereby come to grips with the problem of 'loss of integrity' - which clearly is closely akin to the problem of human semantics being a form of 'humbug' trying to solve the problem of identities among entropies in distributional non-equi-probabilities. This semantic 'humbug' is probably related to the problem of integrity in computation. My logical theorem makes it possible to eliminate 'negation' from logic and thereby define truth as 'influx of information from eternity into history' - which could be an aspect of mystic inquiry.

Clearly the whole problem is concerned with the status of grammatical-logical categories and paradoxes - which also is a central theme of my PhD dissertation 'A waist of time' - see the concluding 'Epistemes and cyclic time'.