19 january 2026

19 january 2026

John Bjarne Grover

On background of my article Four parallels: Dickinson, Wittgenstein, Celan, Grover of 10 september 2025, with the follow-up on 20 october 2025, whereby it seemed that T.S.Eliot could constitute an interesting 5th element, I studied his poem 'The cultivation of christmas trees' (from the collection 'Ariel') relative to my own TEQ #1290:

Click here for a larger view of the poems

(Source of Eliot's poem).

When I studied this correlation, I noticed that modern conceptions of the photon tells that it is a massless particle which can exist at only one speed (according to Einstein theory). This also means that the photons are discrete particles, such as my third element ('For each of the only') suggests. My element 9 = 'a rope to all men' suggests a character of spin (like a twisted rope) for the photon particle - something which applies also to the following two elements: 'Buda' and 'Pest' are etymologically first attested (by Benkő, L. et al: A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára. 4 volumes. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 1984) to the years 1642 ('Buda' in the sense of german 'Abtritt') and 1401 ('Pest' in the sense of '[calcium]mine') which by my PEB 135 (in accordance with the analysis in this article) suggests 'empirical braid' = 'spin' (by the twisted rope) or (if the poem is considered as virtually 16 lines, the 'sixteenth') the word 'plank' (cp. Planck's constant for this spin of the light - see the value ħ under 'spin' and 'spin states' for qualities of the photon - with link to the Planck constant), while PEB #223 suggests 'lightly'. Planck's constant in the notation ħ has also this 'querstrich' as on the cheek of the 'Black Madonna of Częstochowa' (see this source).

See this 'brief comment' for today 19 january 2026: If e.g. norwegians (by the comment I added) could have planned to steal aspects of my idea, they could perhaps have asked a computer expert program to find (in the course of only minutes) a missing link between this-and-that and the socalled Planck's constant which I had included a comment on - in the form of the above - in an earlier draft to the article which I published on 6 january 2026. The spanish train accident was at 'Verdad' del Carpio and 'AVE de Adamuz' - hence a truth of a 'Planck' could perhaps be not so far to seek.

22 january 2026:

Are these observations on Planck's constant a mere coincidence? Then they would not be so interesting. My intuition tells that they are probably not a mere coincidence but on the contrary Planck's constant could be an essential aspect of the blue metre, in which case one could expect to find a reflex of the value of the constant also in my PEB. It is not so difficult to find it: The first 2 (or really 3) occurrences of it are on PEB #79 line 6,6875 (skipping the occurrence immediately before it at the end of line 6 - cp. the constant vs the reduced constant which differ with the factor 2π = 6,28318), which means 78 + 6,6875/14 = 78,477678 and on PEB #135 line 5,3 which means 134 + 5,3/14 = 134,37857. Now multiplying these two first occurrences gives precisely Planck's constant - or rather the 'reduced Planck's constant' which is the constant divided with 2π:

78,477678 * 134,37857 = 10545,71815... which is precisely the reduced Planck constant = 1.054571817... × 10^-34 J⋅s.

How can it be so immensely precise? Well, I had computed backwards from the constant divided with the occurrence on PEB #135 and found that the first 'plank' should be on PEB #79 line 6,6875. Is it? The word ends on alphabetic letter 17 out of 25 = 0,68 on line 7 which is good enough indeed. What does it mean? It could mean that this is 'black on white' - that Plack's constant ("the constant was postulated by Max Planck in 1900 as a proportionality constant needed to explain experimental black-body radiation") which I found also in the etymologies of 'Buda' and 'Pest' ('dark and white'?) is not a coincidence in the blue metre - and hence that the historic time dimension of my blue metre definition in 'POLAKK English Bloggi' has a rather high precision and relevance for determining the factor in other fields of study. See also my article Caravaggio's and Mazzola's blue metre. I think it is relevant to observe also that the phonetic parallelism with the Bhagavadgita is perhaps not a coincidence either. Which should be rather interesting?

Such a pity, though, that these things for the time being seem to be used mainly for pumping up giant stockmarket bubbles which have to break one day and the world risks being thrown into an economic depression which could end in world war. It may be that my book is not so much according to the trends of the current times - but clearly it need not taste of glass-of-wine-at-the-fireplace-poetry or be according to the taste of the current hard core of the parnassus for being interesting poetry. It is very possible that not any typical poetry editor of today would publish the book. My work studies the human semiotics and how that tells of the redundancies inherent in the limitations of our conception of reality - not the least for the aim of trying to peep beyond these limitations. Which is the mystic inquiry program. I have suggested that even gravitation can be given a negative charge called 'mystic charge' and hence possibly be brought on a common description with electromagnetism - at least as far as their common speed is concerned. Clearly the precision of this Planck constant in this 'blue metre' could be promising even for physical theory in this sense of it.

The fact that this form of Planck's constant could seem to be the product of two factors, whether constants or dependent variables, is clearly interesting. I try the ratio 78,477678 / 134,37857 = 0,5840044 and I look up PEB #59 for the line 0,4 * 14 = line 5,6 = 0,6 into line 6 = "before they form the pairs". Ahja, so this could be about the two factors in the product - but maybe before they take definable shape, which could suggest that they could be dependent variables. This phenomenon could perhaps even be the reason why one talks of Planck's constant h and reduced constant ħ - differing only in that other constant 2π - it should otherwise suffice with one of them? (Like a circle's circumference and 'reduced' circumference?) In fact the value 0,5840044 is very close to another physical constant of related kind - the socalled 'Wien frequency displacement law constant' which is 5.878925757... × 10¹⁰ Hz⋅K^-1 and which likewise is concerned with socalled 'black-body' radiation and relates by Planck's constant also to Boltzmann's constant and temperature and an additional constant 'x'. PEB 58,78925757 would be about 0,78925757 * 14 = line 11,0496 in PEB #59 which should be "makes the modern fiat. / I'm". Hence a constant in a measure of 'the faculty of faith'? It is my 'semiotic' approach to believe that the world is constructed through a tedious construction work that can take millenia for a new level - and that e.g. the new world of subatomic particles is constructed gradually through the active participation of our 'faculty of faith' when making hypotheses on basis of empirical data which we test by conjectures - and - voila! - the theory seems to make sense! Indeed it does. That is because we believe that it is like that - and therefore it is like that - and remains like that - and this nature of the new world is constructed via what "makes the modern fiat. / I'm". In fact Boltzmann's constant k_B = 1,380 6505(24) × 10^-23 can be multiplied with the 'plank' in PEB #79 = 78,477678 for the result 1,3806505 * 78,477678 = 108,35 which means 0,35 * 14 = line 4,9 in PEB #109 - which is near the end of the line 5 = "it came from mother's fa[ce]" - or, say, "it came from mother's faith" - that is, the confidence that lends reality to the laws of nature as these are constructed through millenia with the human 'faculty of faith'. But that means of course that the human semiotic society has constructed a new and reliably constant redundancy in which we can take confidence - it does not mean that it 'really' is like that. Therefore it is important to understand just this aspect of the knowledge - if we want to peep beyond our innate predispositions.

Now take a new look at Eliot's christmas tree and my TEQ #1290 from this point of view: "It came from mother's face/faith" would apply to his conception of the role of childhood christmas (here including the idea of a gradual construction of the even formal human reality through generations), while my "Dr.Both / You were blinking! / For each of the only / I come homewards, bis, like I should / kiss you, / like we should meet on basis of literature" would interpret this in the form of Planck's constant apparently compositional on a semiotic basis which also seems to lend to any written (symbolic) form of knowledge e.g. also an empirical value of the historic time point in which it was written.