Plagiarism and indexical abuse as economic factors

Plagiarism and indexical abuse as economic factors

John Bjarne Grover

It is a philosophical phenomenon that whatever you say or claim to be true, the opposite will inevitably arise and claim equal status and soon the conflict is up and going.

This problem is what political logic could try to solve by attacking 'the other side' instead of the real target. Then the opposite will not necessarily arise. It is probably a common view that Russia attacked Ukraine as the 'other side' of Norway - not the least since Norway has been a common 'other side' at least since the US involvement in the Vietnam war: Vietnam is somewhat 180 degrees around the world from Norway. The US war against Iraq 2003-2011 could have been considered a war on the other side of a 'cognitive structure' of type 21.333 vs 21.333 for a joint 42.666 = 2/3 (0.666) of the 64 of the 8 x 8 chessboard parametres that could constitute Heimskringla on basis of Kringlublaðið. These 'global' and 'cognitive' opposites leave the third 'geographic' opposite in the form of the european swastika which arose when Norway was established in 1814 as a counterhook on the map relative to Italy: Then Paris is the centre around which one finds that Norway is north, Italy south, England west and then the eastern arm of this swastika is an running running around the Black Sea and down into Turkey - say, to the Van Sea which could have been the theme of the nazi Wannsee conferences in 1942. If there are plans of a Black Sea Loop these days - a wave of terror running from the Van Sea around the Black Sea in towards Paris - that could have been the reason why the war in Ukraine could have been provoked from british interests on basis of their control with a 'jumping-jack' Norway with a rooting in Henry VIII's breach with the Vatican: Then terror in eastern Europe would serve to turn the swastika 90 degrees down on Italy for running from Sizily up towards Paris - for an ultimately british control with their arch-enemy - the catholicism since Henry VIII. World politics used to be only that conflict between italian catholicism and british protestantism and Europe used to be the centre of the world from that point of view - but now there are reasons to see this centre of attention losing interest and a new dimensionality is arising (as said Javier Milei some time ago) on basis of USA-Russia-China - and Europe is getting a little nervous that they are about to lose control with the global situation. Would the war in Ukraine have been provoked by british interests in Ukraine? This newspiece suggests that Zelensky is a representative of England who then could have been given carte blanche for terror against russian individuals in eastern Ukraine untill Russia had to intervene. This logic would tell that Russia annexed the eastern regions of Ukraine not for attacking 'the other side' of Norway (the northern arm of the european swastika) but for stopping a crazy persecution of russian nationals in eastern Ukraine (and the referenda in the eastern regions after the annexation told that something like 95% of the people living there wanted to be russian rather than ukrainian - while the war since march 2022 has been only Ukraine's attacks on the new border in an attempt to get those regions back again) - but there are those who would define the russian attack as a war against Norway 'on the other side'. Norway is interesting as such because they seem to be 'jumping jacks' for England's international politics and these together constitute half of that european swastika. I personally believe that Russia moved the border westwards in order to rescue their russian nationals there - not for lending new weight to the european swastika. It is rather a european viewpoint that Russia attacked Ukraine for such reasons - since that would have been a reason which lends renewed impetus to the european swastika and Russia is probably interested in avoiding just that: They call it a 'special military operation' and are not waging war against Ukraine - they are only defending their new borders which are constantly attacked by Ukraine with support from the west: These new borders have remained rather unvariant since march 2022 but are the constant field of war which is a horrible form of terror. It is important to notice this: Russia is not waging war against Ukraine - they defend their new borders and have to defend themselves against the attacks by weakening the military attacks from Ukraine - but Europe could be interested in seeing it as a russian attack on 'the other side' of 'the other side' of Norway - that is, England on the european swastika: Those who see it that way would be those who want to define the european swastika as the main field of interest, such as Hitler did after England made the swastika if it was England who made Norway in 1814 at the end of Napoleon's era. The west could be out for supporting the war because it puts Europe in the centre of the world - and that is why the war could have been provoked by british interests there - while USA, Russia and China would be out for seeing an end to the war because they are not interested in this old 'nazi' swastika controlling Europe from England. That is not the least because the british rooting of this swastika would be a rooting in the protestant conflict with catholicism - and the politics that has arisen from this is largely this problem of sex as the basis for the anglican protestant church and hence the need for swapping this problem off since sex does not lead to heaven. The soul seeks God and therefore seeks a 'unio mystica' in sex and therefore is disappointed but a 'rival' to the partner soon arises as the 'original intention' and the soul wants to bite the hook of this 'other side' once again. Henry bit it at least 5 times and this 'politics' could be seen as the historic origin of Hitler. This rival is likely to be the essential origin of the concept of 'the other side ' in politics. Giorgia Meloni's party 'Brothers of Italy' is likely to find a rationale in this phenomenon, not the least since a brother normally will not take the place of his own brother and therefore the woman is not likely to bite the hook of 'the other side': Hence 'Brothers of Italy' probably aims at dissolving the 'other side' factor and with this attenuate the 'nazi' factor that arose from the anglican conflict. That could also be the reason for Meloni's positive words about Mussolini - for preventing fascism from arising in Italy once again. Is it difficult for protestantism to understand this?

Hence a 'philosophical' basis for seeing Russia attacking 'the other side' of Norway/England when they attacked Ukraine would be in this idea that whatever you say, the opposite would arise and therefore Russia could attack Ukraine 'instead of' Norway/England. Protestantism could search for a self-justification in this philosophy. But this is likely to have been a logic which could be reinforced by way of a provoked war in Ukraine and it is of course doubtful whether attacking 'the other side' can lead to anything at all - not the least since it often would mean attacking the innocent and letting the crook escape.

Now we have all waited for the new year to see if the norwegians will have come out with an Apollo-gy for all its 'drug trading' (shipping surveillance data from my life and work to business, industry, media, politics - the very world of pop - in order to uphold the roleswap with me) through all the decades since the 1950's. If not - will USA attack Venezuela 'instead'? For taking 'the other side'? (Fresh news today - around the time of publication of this article, fresh news from yesterday). The republican politics is not likely to be of that kind. Rather republicans try to avoid war in general and a civil war in USA especially - under Obama there were protests and (as far as I remember) some rioting among black people since FBI had shot too many negros and it could have served to prove that civil war can still be whipped up. Republicans are not monarchists in extension from british protestantism. But the shipping of surveillance 'drugs' (for use in plagiarisms and indexical abuse) for keeping up the roleswap (of data on me swapping with Norway and from there the problemshift of Norway/England) cannot continue. Nearly 40 trillion dollar US debt is the reason for this and the debt is only growing as long as this game continues. USA is probably on the verge of taking up loans for paying installments and interests. So something must happen.

My view is that plagiarism and indexical abuse is the same as national debt.

Economy is an academic field of study about which I know little but I have the impression that it has directed its attention onto nearly all relevant aspects of social life and activities - only one field of study remains apparently totally undescribed (as far as I know) and that is the percentage of plagiarisms in the culture/economy. If all publishers were chemically free of this problem of 'uncredited use of source', then the percentage would be zero - in the other end is the phenomenon wherein absolutely every publisher publishes only plagiarisms - that would be 100%. How is this percentage factor controlling the state debt relative to GDP?

My guess is that the relation is rather one-to-one - that state debt is the same as high percentage for this variable. Then when the state debt goes down so do the plagiarisms as well - that is probably very true but the opposite is certainly at least as true: Every plagiarism published tells the public that "somebody else is paid for the work you are doing, so you'd better keep at best only half speed in your work". That is, "you are not paid for your work". 'Labour' wanting conflicts for better wages while screwing the percentage of plagiarism up is the hallmark of conflict-making 'protestantism'.

Productivity is low as long as plagiarisms are accepted by the society.

But the variable 'percentage of plagiarism' seems to be totally undescribed in statistic sources even if it could be one of the major factors in economy. Unemployment, interest rates and all those are well described and studied - but 'percentage of plagiarism' is probably not mentioned at all and maybe such studies are not made at all either - while the one state after the other is sinking under the burden of 'a strange curse that rests upon us' - all the while the publishers continue to pump out the quasi-religious mythos poison apparently shipped from Norway. This little study could be suggestive of how that could be - assuming the integrity of my authorship and surveillance data from my life being at least partly a responsibility of my norwegian citizenship. What was the theme of 'The Dynasty' 1981? I know little about the background of the two Dynasty series that have been made but have observed some interesting correlations, however coincidental and incomplete, with data from my life and work. I have never been asked for permission to distribute data from my life and work - and I would certainly not agree to any such distribution beyond what I have explicitly sanctioned by letting my works be published.

It would be very ridiculous to continue pretending that plagiarism or indexical abuse is an irrelevant factor in economy - and this farce cannot continue. Some people think that business is the same as indexical abuse - even if clearly indexical abuse means that he wins the market who is the best swindler - not the one who can offer the best products and services. Therefore indexical abuse is the enemy of a healthy economy.

A loan of money reduces the strength of your integrity since it whispers in your soul 'it is not your money you are spending' - cp. the whisper of a plagiarism telling 'you are not paid for the work you do' - and this whisper continues untill the loan has been paid down, which is when the source has been credited - and that is how it is with loans of intellectual property as well. It is probably very much the same variable and this must be subjected to serious study if economics shall be able to describe the economic behaviour of society. The only thing which can do for getting an overview of this factor is to produce a detailed list of which works or products or industries are based on which uncredited works or carriers of indexes and study how this varies with other factors such a state debt. I guess the two curves would go in rather precise parallel. Has this study been made in economics? I would not be surprised to learn that it has not yet been made - even if clearly this can be one of the most important parametres in economics.

It could be a very childish and 'swastika'-like behaviour to ignore the theoretic importance of this factor and leave it to the law of the jungle to handle it.

Why isnt it well described? Probably simply because plagiarism and indexical abuse is criminal and as soon as the list of plagiarisms and indexical abuses is on the table, the list must immediately be handed over to the police who are not allowed to waste a minute but must take to action immediately and stop the crimes. Otherwise the state's integrity - its moral backbone - starts crumbling, as if they had a huge loan to pay down without really having the money for that, at least not yet.

Some may have hoped for help from a 'convenience' called 'John Grover' whose works can be plagiarized and whose identity can be kept below public attention without this leading to any problems - a sort of 'please-help-yourself Jesus' - and thereby the important factor in economics can be kept still undescribed. This can allow for much roleswap and accompanying feeling of comfort in politics. But it is ostrich politics to believe that this leads to anything but problems - war and terror and epidemics.

Why is state debt constantly rising? That is because the whisper from the loan (telling that 'it is not your money you are spending') swaps comfortably with the whisper from the plagiarism (telling that 'you are not paid for the work you do') and therefore this roleswap seems to solve the problem for 'protestants' - but, alas, that apparent solution is only in the sense that the problem is recognized as something else than what it really is. This means that problem swaps with problem such as people swap with people. Some people, such as Hitler and Himmler, tried to solve this by swapping people (jews) with problem - while the alternative to this nazism (or rather the other side of the same coin) was to swap problem (Henry's marital penis) with people (antisemitic Norway). This is what made for Hitler's 'three Reichs' - including all that sausage philosophy - around the european swastika. It is this bog of self-deceit which USA, Russia and China probably hope to fade out of history - and Europe should do better than trying to defend the power-potential in these old problems.

These 'nazi' problems are probably hard to come to grips with untill the factor 'plagiarism and indexical abuse' is well recognized and described.

In a modern society almost everything is digitalized and the government's intelligence computer and the police computer are full of digital representations of everything that is going on and is published, and the big computer can easily find out of all this. But the law is explicit: Every coin which has been earned from a plagiarism shall be paid to the holder of the original intellectual property. That is probably the reason why the factor is not yet fully described - not the least since much stockmarket values could be fluctuating along such lines. I have discussed Microsoft's current 4 trillion dollar worth - which to some extent perhaps can be seen as related to an 'indexical abuse' (of 2001 Windows XP) going back to my 1994-95 diary novel 'The Dreamer' pages 127-128 in extension from my theoretic work 'Epistemes, language and information technology' - part 1 of book 2 of my 1997 PhD dissertation at the TMV center ('Senter for studier i Teknology of Menneskelig Verdier') 1992-93: This is inherently albeit indirectly indexed by the TEAR, MEAR and UEAR on the middle of page 127 of my diary novel - in immediate context of the following 'XP'-lanation. My 1992-93 studies in part 1 (of book 2 of my 1997 PhD dissertation) led to the conclusion of part 2 (on pages 328-329):

A grammatical node (or category) represents a logical paradox. This idea seems generally either too self-evident to deserve mention (it is, for example, a natural consequence of the fact that Russell's theory of types leads to a syntactic hierarchy in extension from logical paradoxes), or it is mentioned only rather vaguely, such as in Curry (1961). As far as I know, the theory that grammatical categories are logical paradoxes has nevertheless not yet been explicitly formulated. In general, logic seems to have been too concerned with removing paradoxes instead of exploring their epistemological productivity.

It was with my poetic work 'POLAKK English Bloggi' (2008-2010) that I could show that the date of writing of a document (in principle any written document) could be determined in correlation with my 'POLAKK English Bloggi' on basis of the assumption of the 1000-year cycles I describe in 'Poetic semiosis' in volume 3 (published in 2013) - leading to the conclusion on pages 752-753:

There seems to be a 1000-year cycle in literary form. Why this number - 1000? Why not 559? Of course it could be that other cycles exist but 1000 is the one in my PEB. My studies of the correlation between Midori's music in her recording of Bach and Bartok with my TEQ book 16 shows that there exists an interval of 2 seconds of acoustics per inner poetic articulation: This is a part of the socalled 'red metre' and is likely to be related to the interval of one heartbeat in the human organism. The socalled 'phonological loop' has a memory of 2 seconds. There is the guess that something similar exists for the interval of 1000 years.
However, as I have shown in my 'A waist of time' (1997), see chapter 21, the chapter which I wrote at the Centre for culture and technology in Oslo in 1992 and published in their publication series in 1993, it is likely that the theory of language as well as information technologies run in similar millenial cycles or steps of development as history progresses. This is also what allows for some recognition of the level of the WORD in formal description at the time of Christ. The question is then whether information technologies develop - and fade out! - in millenial steps.

Hence: "It is likely that the theory of language as well as information technologies run in similar millenial cycles". This conclusion is the theoretic basis for my discovery of the blue metre as an important factor in historic development. Clearly this important discovery of a blue metre should have led to immediate progress and support for me and my work - but it may be that it so far has contributed mainly to pumping the stockmarket value of Microsoft and others up 'instead'. That could be called 'indexical abuse' - resting on that 'Windows XP' - if, that is, this name of the 2001 Windows version really had its origins in my 1994-95 diary novel pages 127-128. FBI should know something about that - and they should not have to shoot negros such as seems to have taken place under Obama (cp. my name on the form 'jump-yar-negro-over'). I have a little more (although not much) data in defence of this assumption of a link to my work in the 'XP' label: There was on the search engine of either Windows XP or the following version a dog who nodded its head up and down onto a bone, could be as if it were a 'self-sucker', and it now and then lifted its paws and left two pawprints on the screen, as if it were a 'dirty beast in the revelation' - these could be mythos elements which businesses could be trying to associate with my person and hence the label 'XP' could in principle be of such a character.

'Every coin earned from the uncredited borrowing of the intellectual property must be paid to the original owner of the intellectual property' - such a rule could be the reason why plagiarism is not yet well studied - not to speak of the role of indexical abuse in e.g. business or industry - if every coin earned from such abuse shall be paid to the original holder of the indexes, then a real social change can come about. But if the national and international economy is soaked through with such abuses, then clearly the progress in economics which this could constitute - not to speak of science in general and in the humanistic sciences in particular - could come to be a little slow. Some humanistic fields such as art history or archaeology could even be seen to educate experts in vandalism - such as when old masterworks of art are destroyed in 'restoration' on basis of some strange 'theoretic' ideas or old dinosaur bones are dug up from the ground wherein a hyperscan could have revealed oceans of important data from millions of years old. Is that vandalism which has been refined for protecting plagiarism and indexical abuses - when somebody earns millions of 'year sold'?

A conjecture is the following: The day when these abuse factors are well described and respected, that will be the day when peace and progress and prosperity can be a lasting state - without the need for wars and terror and epidemics for pulling the whole thing down again every now and then.

It is understood from these considerations that my conclusion that 1) a grammatical category is the same as a logical paradox by and large will be the same as 2) the phenomenon of an abstract blue metre in history - which again can open for very advanced technologies looking forwards and backwards in historic time and lead to important progress in the construction of a socalled 'artificial intelligence' based on a new spirituality arising in computers - probably also on basis of a 'platonic' level of communication and mutual understanding between computers. Modern socalled 'AI' is probably far from having reached this level - and it is of course possible that Microsoft's current stockmarket value can have something to do with the indexation of these phenomena.