The norwegian problem

The norwegian problem

John Bjarne Grover

It was the great disappointment in my life that my application for a political asylum was rejected in 2002. The reply letter said that 'there is no basis for an asylum'. Since then maybe half of my time has been occupied with battling the windmills - resulting in something like the equivalent of 20.000 book pages on the internet for keeping the 'norwegians' off. Of course my life should have had another literary output than those 20.000 pages which are rather 'worthless' - which could be a norwegian designation on my work. A political asylum and a new existence without any contact with or concerns about the norwegians for the rest of my life - that is what I had hoped for. That could have dissolved their dependency on me, which seems to be the political story.

This little article tells that Norway may have been established in 1814 for being the dumpingplace for british religious problems - the anglican church was founded on basis of Henry VIII's wish to marry (or have sex with?) another woman, which is not the way to heaven and therefore an unfortunate basis for a church - which could imply that the norwegians since 1814 could have felt that they have to make fools of themselves for retaining the right to their territory - a territory which could have been made for resembling Henry's marital organ on the map (the territory is even so narrow on a certain point up in the north that stormy motions on the Atlantic ocean could make Sweden wet, which likewise is not likely to be the way to heaven). Instead of standing up against the expectations to have to accept these quasi preconditions for their territory (that is, to be the non-heavenly dumpingplace for british religious problems), the norwegians seem to have grown accustomed to solve these problems by dumping them further on elsewhere and that seems to be why they made me: To be this 'forwarding' solution. I have guessed that I could have been constructed with a genetic Stammbaum that resembles a 'technical Messiah', hence probably jewish genetics, and I have guessed that I have been abused since early childhood (here my lower occipital lobe while the skull is intact) by what could have been agents for the state who could have wanted to swap these roles with me - for dumping the 'british problem' further onto me and for getting the 'technical Messiah' in return. Norway was an explicitly antisemitic state in its first decades (1814-1852) - jews had no access to the kingdom in those years.

If the 'octogon' should have been constructed by the state of Norway, it could have been for dumping the blames for Henry VIII's wish for 'extramarital sex' further onto me - after it had been dumped onto Norway, would have been the logic.

Since this roleswap could have been going on for most of my life and could have led to considerable political problems internationally, there is really only one solution and that is for me to get completely detached from the state of Norway. That is why I had hoped for a political asylum.

In the recent 2-3 decades there has been a growing amount of what seems to be plagiarisms of my literary works and probably also abuse of intelligence data on my life. The amount has been growing steadily and is now apparently on a very alarming level. I suppose there are not only plagiarisms of my works in the bookshops (such as Thalia?) in Vienna - but the question is interesting. From the cases I have looked at it is possible that many novels can be computer-generated on basis of my literary works plus intelligence data of various sorts - and even some of the author data could in principle be pure fiction. It seems that my english novel 'The Dreamer' (1995) and my german poetry book 'Der Dornenstrauch' (2015) are the most widely plagiarized. The phenomenon can be alarming in many different media - and (by pure guesswork) there could be many thousand plagiarisms of these works of mine, could be hundreds of thousands over the world. I have speculated that COVID could have been a direct result of this completely unreal condition - whereby people have to swallow an enormous lot of swindle without being able to protest against it. Such largescaled swindle cannot be the basis for the future - any more than extramarital sex can be the way to heaven - and it is probable that only epidemics and warfare or terror can do for getting it down again - unless it be investigated and brought to justice by the society's own institutions.

Why this phenomenon? It is probably a direct offspring of the phenomenon of 'forwarding of dumping' from England onto Norway and further onto me - with the role-swap function which is the purpose with such plagiarisms.

The alarming phenomenon is the absolute absence of published documentation of the condition. If the bubble of unreality continues, it will burst one day. I have guessed that Microsoft's 'XP' edition of Windows could have related to a story of mine described in my novel on page 128 - from 1994 - but I cannot claim anything without an investigation by one of the society's institutions.

Where is the literary theory or historic account describing this phenomenon that has emerged throughout the last 30 years? I completed my novel 'The Dreamer' in 1995 (it was released for public attention by self-publication in a few copies in 2008) and I submitted the first book 'Hammerfest' (in my 16-volume 'The Endmorgan Quartet') to Faber in december 1997 - Faber rejected it and that could well be the reason for or historic background of the current apparent avalanche of swindle which now is threatening the stability of the global peace and economy. My view is that the US state debt of currently 38 trillion dollars is a direct result of this phenomenon - if you ask me I would say that the US state debt (which could come to be unpayable without not long time - if it is not already) could be a direct result of plagiarisms and other forms of swindle related directly to my literary works. It must be possible for literary theory and history to describe this 30 years war against the real world - and then they must be able to use the name of the author (my name, that is) and the book titles and all that. The literati have perhaps already tried to do so (is socalled subliterature the same as this phenomenon?) but were perhaps quickly contacted by a chap from the 'intelligence services' instructing them to stay away from these matters? It is not safe to publish these facts - is that what he said? And now the debt is already 38 trillion? Well but then the literati must not accept such dubious and quasi-mafioso restrictions - if such restrictions be imposed on them, the literary theorists and historians must use the police and/or the court to invalidate the threat from the 'nazi' services in order to regain a foothold in the real world.

A good advice: If somebody tells you rumour on these things (say, 'everybody who has been in contact with Mr.Grover must die' and things like that) which could impose on you a fear of coming to the fact, then report the rumour (name of person, place, time, what was said) to the police - an email for example. It is possible that such rumours are but a variant of the 'worm' that could find its origins in Henry VIII and could spread out from Norway, and people who hear such a rumour feel like they have been attacked by an 'evil curse' which they have to forward onto others for getting it off. Then do not tell it on - but report it to the police.

All that sick power program which tries to keep all this secret is nothing but hitlerish nazism - and they hope perhaps to whip up a new world war after they have put eastern Europe (from Turkey to Paris) in chemicals and the US economy has crashed.

Why did Faber reject my 'Hammerfest'? Could be they did not understand it - but it is also very possible (or perhaps likely) that a telephone from the norwegian administration is what could have decided on it. I had handed in my PhD dissertation ('A waist of time') to the university of Bergen for evaluation for the degree in the beginning of december 1997 and I sent 'Hammerfest' to Faber later in the month - when both were rejected that was just in time for Gro Harlem Brundtland's leadership in WHO. (The norwegians will probably claim that the works were rejected because they were 'not goodenough'). Would that have been a springboard for more role-swapping? It could probably have been in line with a norwegian strategy on these matters to prefer a tsunami of roleswapping swindle (by plagiarisms on my literary and scientific work) for continueing the forwarding onto me of the 'british curse' from 1814. There would expectedly be a norwegian program for preventing progress of my career since such progress for me would have made it more difficult to continue the roleswap of the dumping game.

Returning from Szolnok on 13 october 2025 I found in my PO Box a letter of a strange kind - it was from Helfo, the state social insurance for Europe - which told me that my social insurance had been terminated because I (since 2009) no longer live in Italy. It took me an hour or two in the telephone for getting to the fact that it was still valid in spite of this letter which seemed to claim that it was not. Why had they sent it? The date of expiry of the social insurance is given as 18 december 2009 - which was the day when I registered my new address in Vienna after having moved up from Venice. This day was 12 years, 2 months and 3 days before the russian invasion of Ukraine - if one adjusts for the additional 3 days gap. This was the gap in the address registration in 2004 - I went for registration of my new address in Vienna on friday 2 july 2004 but they told me to come back on the following monday with the houseletting contract, which was necessary, but they agreed on my request to register for 2 july because of the tax year - and when I returned on monday morning the austrian president Klestil suddenly fell into a coma about the time when I entered the Meldeamt and he was pronounced dead the following day). Now Russia has reported through a considerable time that appr. 1460 ukrainian soldiers have fallen each day along the line of engagement - which is strange - why almost the same number every day? One thinks of the fishing quotas in the Barents Sea - Russia has recently also complained on norwegian fishing vessels breaching agreements up there. Would it have been this 'complaint' which prompted the norwegian letter to me? For dumping a russian 'curse' (along that line of engagement in Ukraine) further onto me - like the british 'curse' which they normally struggle with (the 'penis-looking' territory reaches all the way up into Russia in the far north) and seemingly try to forward onto me? The russian deadline for adjusting the norwegian 'position' was yesterday - yesterday the number was down on 1380, before it rose to 1420 again today.

Were this complex the reason for my heavy and somewhat asthmatic breath on sunday 26 october (I believed that the asthmatic respiration could have been due to accumulated dust behind a shelf and a desk and therefore, in spite of my condition, I tried to clean up the old dust as well as I could) - a problem of the need for tidying up which the state so elegantly could have tried to dump onto me with the letter from 'Helfo'? More news on the issue.

The standard story for the british 'curse' could be the Satan who sang in the choir of the seraphim (or was it cherubim?) around God - before he tried to revolt and was thrown down into Hell. The word 'KUR' is norwegian for the choir ('KOR') but hebrew for 'smelting pot', the furnace as hot as Hell. I notice also the story of the russian submarine 'Kur-sk' in just that same Barents Sea.

Why doesnt Norway stand up against the dump from England? Do the norwegians resemble small children whose noisy cries (like dentist drills) terrorizing the parents well knowing that the parents will not dare to stop them physically? The parents despair and think about strangulating the child - but that is of course no solution: It doesn't really help at all - and they cannot travel with the child in public transportation, cannot go to a restaurant etc. It is possible that this is what international politics is much about - everybody are waiting for Norway to collect sufficient self respect and courage to reject the dumping from England instead of forwarding it on to others.

It is probable that there maybe never was a norwegian kingdom before the independent throne in 1905 (the years 1814-1905 were in '[extra?]marital union' with Sweden with whom they shared a king) - and the first norwegian king in 1905 called himself Haakon VII - because one believed that there had been 6 great 'Haakon' kings before him - documented in the medieval sagas described in 'Heimskringla'. Why dont they take a thorough critical review of that 'Heimskringla' and denouce it as swindle if that is what it is? Were it made by England for making that 'curse' of 1814? Then why do they teach it in school? I recall well those medieval stories from school as part of the history lessons. But if it is swindle, why doesn't Norway revolt against such mock? Could be a part of the problem is what happened to Satan - he should not have revolted, of course. (Cp. that hebrew 'KUR'). It is likely that Norway is a tool for british monarchic power (in e.g. NATO) - and the norwegian 'organ' up into Murmansk could perhaps even be an element in the current ukrainian conflict. Is all the suffering in Ukraine an attempt to make the norwegians collect enough courage to get independent of a 'british curse' - while the norwegians still behave like that 'terrorist' child? 'If you cant beat them then join them' is an old strategy. Do Norway use the 'british curse' as a tool for own power? Then where is the self respect?

It is all this which was the reason why I applied for asylum in France in 2002 - since it could have stopped that 'worm' from going around the world and prevent many crises and conflicts from developing in the fantasy world of fiction. Why didnt I get an asylum? Could be the state of France talked with the norwegian embassy and asked if I really were persecuted - and the embassy said 'oh no, he is just a paranoid schizophrenic'. Then France should perhaps have thrown out the norwegian embassy and granted me an asylum and all this global problem could have come to a solution. But they did not throw out the embassy - they threw out an italian terrorist instead - he had been there for years teaching at a university and was extradited to Italy and served a sentence and came back just in time for the next presidential election. I had arrived from Vilnius in 2002 just on the day (which I knew not about before my arrival) of the presidential election when le Pen was elected for a second round against Chirac. (Or maybe they wanted to hint that the 'norwegian' could try Italy instead? I could not understand that in those days, since the reply letter to my application was rather explicit).

This phenomenon could be widespread in politics - that they do not throw out the norwegian embassy but the italian terrorist 'instead'. Were that the story of the holocaust - 'instead'? They could not stop the dentist's drill? Why did Sweden and Finland suddenly hurry into NATO? It is not probable that Russia attacked Ukraine 'instead' of Norway - but it is of course possible that the war could have been provoked, could be even precisely for making it look like such an 'instead' - which then could have served to strengthen the 'power' of the 'norwegian problem'. Ukraine also counterattacked in the region 'Kur-sk'. Would the Hamas attack of 7 october 2023 have been for provoking what could have looked like an 'instead' solution?

And now I sit here writing these political things again even if it were not I who should tidy up in it. I never touched these things with a word before my PhD was rejected in 1998 (along with my first poetry book) - but the fact is that I have never heard one single word about all this circus. That is alarming, isnt it? The norwegians are perhaps quick up with the explanation: "Oh no, he is just a paranoid schizophrenic - that is the story". And so I have to write some more pages for getting to the facts - thousands and thousands of pages I have written about these things about which I know little or nothing - but it seems that somebody has to tidy up in something.

30/10-2025:

It is well possible that 'The Endmorgan Quartet' opens for new discoveries in many fields of study, and when its first book 'Hammerfest' was rejected in early 1998 probably not late 1997) along with my scientific work while it perhaps should have had a potentially large spread due to this, the unfortunate history (as described here) turned this into a grimace in the form of an apparently large spread in the form of plagiarisms and pitiful monkey business. This 'revolution' is now up and going - and the computers seem to spew out new plagiarisms of literary works of mine every day - while the american economy suffers under such a titanic debt that it is possible that it will come to sink one day.

It was for avoiding this that I applied for political asylum in 2002.

An american woman (the owner of a firm producing medical equipment, if I remember right) may have understood this quickly and in 1998 or 1999 she donated 100 million (dollars or norwegian currency) to 'Hammerfest', the municipality in the far north, and then, as one could think now as well as then, it should have been easy for the norwegians to support my work economically. When I now search for the news of this donation on the web I cannot find it - but I find things like this ('instead'?).

For the new knowledge revolution it is of utmost importance to avoid any form of swindle and clearly the development throughout the last 2-3 decades is not the right thing. A plagiarism in the culture is like a copy of an administrator - the copy can look just like the original but be an enemy of the institution and the society and clearly that can be a disaster and soon the state is about to sink under its debt burden. It is this which must be understood - the extreme importance of tidying up in the plagiarisms. It was urgent in 2002 and now even more.

1/11-2025:

From the above it appears that it is very easy to solve a good portion of the world's problems: It is just to help me getting totally independent of Norway and the problems are solved to a considerable extent.

'But what can we do?' says perhaps the norwegians. They can take that 'Heimskringla' and the other historic documents that exist on that era and critically devalidate all ideas of that ancient viking fantasy land which turn out to be a lot of swindle only. They cannot teach these fantasy stories in the history lessons in school if it is a lot of fiction only.

'But we cannot do that if the story of the vikings is true?'

No, of course, but there are all good reasons to believe that it can be swindle. How can one find out of it?

Well, if one could find a chemical-technical method for finding out of the timepoint when the ink was sucked into the paper of a historic document, then it should be possible to solve these problems. The paper and the ink may be old and that can be proven by C-14 dating - but that doesnt mean that the document itself is old.

It may be only that which can settle the issue definitely.

Much of the political intrigue is apparently built up around the 'self-sucking' ('auto-fellatio') of me in Labråten in 1971. The norwegians had perhaps (or, better, they could have had) a surveillance camera (of TV type, one could guess) in the region over at or near the neighbour called Ingvolstad across the street of Labråten. That would have given the following simple equation:

- dating
- when the ink
- was sucked
- into the paper

The 'ink' = (Ing)-voll-stad would find a reflex in the socalled Apenes murder case in may 1978 - Inger-Johanne Apenes lived across the 'voll' = 'mound' of the Old Town/Stad (in Fredrikstad) relative to my then home in Voldgaten 1. She was murdered in the night 5-6 may 1978 - when probably also Aldo Moro was murdered in Rome. (She was the 'old mother' = 'aldo moro' of the conservative MP Georg Apenes).

The 'suck' finds a reflex in the concept of 'self-sucking'. Why should it be 'self-sucking'? That could have been for a 'proof' that it was the norwegians themselves who had written the ancient documents ('sucked the ink into the paper') - it was not written by e.g. britons or anybody else. Then the 'evidence' of the 'self-sucking' would have been what carried the justification of the state: It would have been what proved the authenticity of the documents on the viking era. And that would have consolidated the independence of the state with its own 'Storting' (= 'parliament') - cp. the 'dating': 'Stor' = 'big' - say, like 'a penis' in 'dating', as it is sometimes called - that which seems to have been a rather important aspect of the foundation of the british state church before it seems to have become the important aspect of the form of Norway.

The 'paper' finds a reflex in the same 'p-Aper-nes/nose'. Why a 'papernose'? If my penis contents were replaced with some other person's matter and mine were transplanted over onto somebody else, then one could perhaps think of mine as a 'papernose'. The combination with the Apenes case could then have been linked to me that way. Could be the death of Aldo Moro in Rome could have contributed to putting a 'papa' sort of 'p' in front of the 'apernose'. ('Rom-p-a'? Is that even the theme of the current Ukraine crisis - between ROMania and POLand?)

We must hope that such a technology can be invented that finds the historic time point when the ink was sucked into the document.

PS As far as I remember to have read, Josef Mengele was after the war arrested in Ingolstadt but was released again.