Matters of potential abuse

Matters of potential abuse

John Bjarne Grover

Part 1

In december 2018 I fell seriously ill from a retention that had started on 18 october 2018 - it started in the moment when I started to write, edit, complete volume 4 of my literary works. An incontinence condition had developed since about the summer 2015 after I had completed 'Der Dornenstrauch' and bought the house in Szolnok. This incontinence became a worse and worse problem untill 2018 when it started to become a really serious problem, and it was difficult to be in Venice since one cannot just let out the water anywhere in the roadside there. In the autumn I went back from Venice to Vienna for completing my volume 4. I worked more or less around the clock from 18 october 2018 and for about 5 weeks with completing the book - much of it was already finished - the poetry over the first 900 pages and the theory chapters 5 and 7 were largely completed - but some of it had to be written from the beginning (most of the nearly 400 pages of the theoretic chapters) - some it was also fresh research, such as the chapter on sumerian cuneiform which shows that the received interpretation of cuneiform probably has some at least poetic rationale. See this fresh article (also of today) for an application of some of the contents of that chapter.

The retention could have been the simple fact that after the three first volumes were completed and self-published in 2013 - and the enumeration of TEQ = volume 2 was made in the summer 2012 as part of the preparations to this - I felt that I should not have to self-publish even a fourth volume in the same form - there should be enough sensibility around in the world to make me expect that the fourth volume would come to be naturally published by some serious publisher - many articles under this page tells why 'Der Dornenstrauch' of 2015 should have been published and well received. Could be that is why my body protested against such a fourth volume when I started writing it out, and the body refused to let more water out. The kidneys probably ran leak after a few days and I went for some days to Szolnok and found a herb medicine ('Urostemol') which opened the retention and I worked for the rest of the weeks wrapped in diapers. But it was too late for the leak in the kidneys and my belly eventually looked like a pregnant woman. When the book was finished in the end of november 2018 I went for a holiday in Venice and was convinced that a few days of rest would bring me back on my feet - but, alas, it seemed that the kidneys could not cleanse the blood quickly enough (even if the water filled the diapers well) and the pulse eventually went up into some hundreds when I tried to ascend a stairway - 4 steps up was probably enough for 4 hundred or something like that. I still believed that some more rest would solve my problems but one morning I stepped out of bed I fell like a sandbag and could not get up again, and I was transported to hospital where they healed me miraculously, even if it took nearly 7 weeks. I believe I got 13 bags of concentrated blood - that is probably like 7 litres or more. A blood clot seemed to have developed at the hip to the one leg and they recommended a strong dissoluting medicine which required that a filter - in 'brolly' style - was put into the main artery for preventing big clots in the lungs, but I believed that I had to go around with this brolly for a longer time and preferred the softer dissoluting medicine which could take a little more time but made the fragile umbrella superfluous. The doctors also explained that one or both of the urine channels from the kidney down to the bladder had sprung leak and they asked for permission to put in a catheter for a quick repair before it would be taken out again after a few days. That required anaesthesia and I asked if it would heal naturally without catheter? It certainly would, they said, it could only take some more time. It was the explanation to this hole in the urine channel which made me a little suspicious since it sounded not probable - would there really come a hole there? By overpressure from the ardent kidneys - or from the heavyweight burden of the bladder? But circus artists wriggle and turn around without getting this problem and the bladder cannot fall much deeper however full it gets - and so I thought they must be talking euphemistically and I said I would prefer the natural way, to which they agreed. The story could be that they had to put the repair tools through the urine channel, via the bladder and up the channel all the way up into the kidneys, and since this sounds not so pleasant they had tried to explain it in a softer way. In addition, the catheter would be put in at the cardiological department, which I could not understand (wouldnt the urological have been more natural?). However that be, probably a few days later there arrived what looked like a surgeon and an anaesthesia doctor with probably two big gas containers on a trolley - and that is the last I remember from this. I must have fallen asleep. Some time later I discovered that 1000 euros had been stolen from my wallet and I therefore started to keep it in the toilet bag and keep that under the bedcover while I slept. There nevertheless disappeared another 500 euros some time later and not much was left there. (Could be the order was first 500 and then 1000, I dont remember, but the sum was 1500). Some other papers had also been removed from the wallet. I called for the responsible person of the department who promised to come but did not - a person occurred and consumed a dinner at a nearby table but that must probably have been something else. I therefore asked for police and there came one from probably the 'questura' (polizia statale?) and took up the explanation, but there never came an answer. I was later by for inquiring at the questura a couple of times but there were no news. What could this have been? There is this possible explanation that the law requires permission from the patient in the hospital for such a medical operation, and when I had not given the permission, they had to follow the other obligation telling that they naturally have to mend a sick person as well as they can and not let them out again in bad condition, and then an op without permission could be felt like a 'rape', for which reason they ask for permission. But that meant that they had to do it without my permission - if this operation was necessary in spite of the explanation - and that would 'cost them a little' - in particular if I should turn out to be a troublemaker who would take them for it afterwards, claiming that I had been raped and 'it was not necessary' and things like that. That is not the case: Of course I am only happy for their excellent help and for them having rescued my life and I would never dream about taking them to court for this or launch any accusations, but there is another possible explanation which could be a cause of worry which I should perhaps not ignore completely. For once, why in the cardiological department? Of course I could not agree to 'only semi-necessary repairs' if that could have included replacement of organs - since there could have been abusive political or 'intelligence' interests who had asked for this in order to make it easier for them to claim that my integrity were shady and my work could more convincingly be claimed to have been written by others. There exists this myth that John F.Kennedy or something like that could have been rebuilt to a female and his penis contents were transplanted onto me while my own were used for constructing a 'dritte Reich' condition - and then claims could have been launched - not the least on background of the other mythology about the lost norwegian poetic work (say, 17th-18th century) which could have been the basis for Hitler's nazism. If ideas such as these find empirical support in other circumstances, there could be some reason for alarm - and then the stolen money could have meant that they had stolen some of my organs. However, I do not believe that this is what happened - nor do I believe that I had been poisoned before I came to the hospital - I certainly think that the condition was because of the problems that accumulated while writing volume 4 - and I believe that the catheters would have been put in at the hospital bed where I was and therefore they came up with the anaesthesia bottles, and the catheters were later taken out again - after I had been put to sleep with a spray and then drugged with medical anaesthesia gas. But why were I not informed about this?

Except perhaps by theft of my money?

There was a check after I had left the hospital but I was not informed about the details of the condition, only (when I asked) that it was 'migliorata'.

There later developed the problem that since I was not in a critical condition and the needed occasional change of the Foley catheter (from the bladder and out) was not emergency, I could not get medical help in Italy (since I was a resident of Austria) to have it changed and this story followed. When I pulled the catheter with inflated balloon (about 2 cm diametre) out (which probably is not too much of a scandal - if they can put things in that way during urological operation the urine pipe is probably expanded to more than 2 cm diametre), the prostate (or prostate opening) could have been injured and when the new catheter was put in (this was now an emergency situation which gave me access to and help from the hospital - although that was of course not intended), the prostate could later have developed a closure, and when I later could stop using the Foley catheter, it seems that the prostate either does not function (it is probably blocked) or it has been removed. The removal of an enlarged prostate is a normal method for treating a permanent retention condition and they had said in the hospital that mine was a little enlarged. However, when I tried being without the Foley catheter after about a year, the retention started again and I had to use it for yet some months - so this was not the explanation. I now guess that it is only blocked due to injuries from the inflated balloon during pullout - and not that it was removed in the hospital without any information to me (except by those missing money).

I have guessed that there could have been 'intelligence interests' wedging intrigues with secrecy obligations in among medical and police personnel - but clearly that would have been only for whipping up conflict and for putting Italy on the wrong side. Or is the ultimate cause that there is a norwegian representation in Italy? I am a very normal person who has nothing to do with all this crazy mythomania - in particular a role as Jesus of a 'nazi Madonna' must count as dirty nazi philosophy only - and it is probable that I should have had a political asylum since long - for bringing me out of that nazi vortex and calming all the unhealthy mythomania down. Could be it would have been difficult for me to thrive in a country if there is a norwegian embassy there - if I should have been badly abused in childhood and my literary works later were as well, this would be a challenge which tells other people that they have to accept either me or them - and then an embassy already lowers my chances and esteem in a country - and the state of Norway has so far not found any reason to apologize for any abuse there could have been by state responsibility. Clearly if this is the problem then the solution should have been that I got a political asylum in a country which also threw the norwegian embassy out untill they had confessed the story - if, that is, this should be the story. But nobody tells me anything about this - and is that because there wasnt any abuse, only my fantasies - or what could be the reason for this?

It is all the secrecy which seems to be the real problem. To see me as 'unwanted' is not permitted - I am a very normal person and that would be just racism of the kind of e.g. 'all jews are unwanted here' - and that was the beginning of the state of Norway in 1814. 'Because he is the dirty beast of the revelation'? That is of course completely illegal ideas and such claims should lead to a stop of such intrigue-makers - but it is possible that that could be difficult unless the secret problem is brought to daylight.

Are there very dirty plans of hijacking my work? That is even less respectable.

It is well possible that the real problem is that extensive child abuse under official protection has led to an accept of and historic support to the state which I as a normal human should have had - and problems there could have been in the state could then be recognized in me instead. Dirty beast of the revelation? That is not true. This can make it difficult for people to understand the problem - and then conflict can break out and land people on the wrong side - while downgrading all these dirty secrets is what could solve all those problems. Of course people do not want Hitler power but that power wants to turn the roles around - that is why the problem should have been downgraded.

Could be I have been the target of nazi intrigue and political pressure since before the war - accumulated to gigantic dimensions - and then if just a tiny gap of potential ambiguity is left open for 'tacit understatement', leaving certain elements unspecified (say, if the money were lifted from my wallet for 'telling me something'), this potentially enormous historic-political pressure on my person can easily get out of control and start swirling around in the 'role-swaps' and then many people could find this difficult. But clearly there could also be other reasons for ambiuities that are left unclarified.

Part 2

I have earlier speculated if the US TV series (of type socalled 'soap') called 'The Dynasty' could have been related to surveillance and other archive material on my historic person - my life (on the historic background) and work.

'The Dynasty' has been produced and sent in two rounds. The first was first time sent in january 1981 - the year when I went to Rome in february, and there was later the attempt on the pope and Ragna Grøver's alleged car accident, and would this have been related to the name of Zelensky? The series went in 15 episodes in 1981, 22 in 1981-1982 and 24 in 1982-1983 - after which I withdrew more or less from the social scene and have not re-entered it. New episodes were produced through the 1980's and the last were in 1991. There is the theory that some political intrigue had forced me into some cases of 'auto-fellatio' ('self-sucking') in 1971 - and I have speculated if this were the more or less secret basis for this series, or, say, a part of it. I saw an intro video of a few seconds which included a brief look at what resembled the white-grey-dark linoleum pattern on the floor of my then childhood room. The spurted semen had to be spit out in the sink in the nearby bathroom - and such a sink is called a 'servant' - cp. the title of the TV series (even of his later presidency?) of Zelensky as 'Servant of the people'. But these are sheer speculations of mine - I have no data on this matter. There were the blue marks on Ragna Grøver's shoulder which caused worry - and I solved the mystery with the conclusion that the safety belt ('selen' in norwegian) probably had snapped on impact and its metal attachment had hit her there. The blue mark could also possibly be spotted in Saul Bellow's book title 'The Bellarosa connection' ('bil-arosa'?), but, again, this is mere speculation. (Do you feel, when you read 'snapped on impact', that Mr.Grover got quite a good grip on the english there? If so, is there a norwegian representation in your country?)

But clearly if this were about such a 1971 event as the underlying basis for the TV series, for example on the formula 'die nasty', it could have contributed to my withdrawn social role of later years. A heavy burden it could have been on my social interface if this were the story. The pretext could have been that the series should help me forwards in my life due to precisely such a 'proud moment' - but such a pretext would probably rather serve to cover what is more likely to be conceived as a 'hijack' of such a moment by international political interests from little me. Could be also for magnifying it into a 'dirty beast of the revelation'.

If these ideas should have a basis in reality, it would have been about abuse of my life. Another TV series with the same name was sent from 2017 onwards. I have now speculated if this could have been based on (plagiarized) my poetry book "Der Dornenstrauch" which I completed in april 2015 - after which I bought the house in Szolnojk and started developing the problems of incontinence described above. Is there any evidence of this? I have not seen any of it but the very first seconds of it - sent out in 2017 - is this intro video - beginning with an image which could look like the cover to my book folded out:

Clearly the lamp in the middle is the gauze bottle to the left on my cover - that is another piece of 'ex nihilo' matter and I pasted it in next to the rest of this 'magic image' - see the introductory observations to this study - the 'magic images'. After the first still photo there follows in the TV intro the photos and names of the actors - all of them in two angles/versions - and it is possible to associate each of them with an aspect of the back page of my book - in which the 'gestalt switch' of the 'chinese hen' on the top as it alternates with what looks like a dog with something (a carrot or what is it) in the ear - while this 'carrot' evidently could have been zipped over from the lower face gazing with great amazement at the strange gauze bottle.

Gillies = 'girlies' = the poultry, the hen of China, she who lays the egg
Kelley = 'kennely' = the dog at the hopsasa kennel - a 'maul-let'? (vs. the 'wal-let'?)
James Mackay = 'jeg med smekken' = 'me with the fly/zipper/swatter'
Robert Christopher Riley = the surreal bottle?
Sam Adegoke = he with the impressive jacket over the shoulder
Alan Dale = the baby swimmer, 'turning prize' (cp. 'Ole Johan Dahl' = the displaced nose?)
Grant Show = the four small elements around in the image?
Rafael de la Fuente = the text on the back page

The intro image adds the front page - for the whole front + back page, with the lamp as the bottle.

I have never heard a word about this association of 'The Dynasty' 2017 or its actor names with my book - but it looks arguably like an interesting theory.

The theme of the TV series is 'The Denver-Clan' - which sounds not so unsimilar to 'Der Dornenstrauch'.

If the series should have been a plagiarism of my book, it is not probable that there would have been many outright quotes - but one could perhaps expect to find that my literary work would be present in all or most details in the visual canvas of the TV screen in some way or other.

It was, as described above, in late 2018 that I nearly died from the retention (which started in that moment when I was about to prepare volume 4 including 'Der Dornenstrauch') and my health deteriorated markedly and has not really come up to former levels again.

It is of course possible - if the 2017 series were based on my book without crediting the source - that my health deteriorated because of the massive abuse there would have been in this.

But I know all too little about this to continue making such hypotheses on such a weak basis. It must, however, be understood that the world is in a very miserable condition indeed if this story should be the case and nobody does anything with it but everybody hope that I shall get up on my crutches again for battling the beasts of terror and monkey business which otherwise could threaten the spiritual and bodily health of the culture of the third millenium.

"Why isnt he doing something to stop it? Is he a nazi or what is the reason?"

After the burglary in my house in Szolnok in the spring 2019, not so long after I had left the hospital, the police came to record the evidence but I had the feeling that maybe they included me in the range of potential suspects. Did they believe that I am a nazi, an agent? Has somebody given them such false information? I am not an agent, and not a nazi.

It is of course urgently important that no stone be left unturned in this historic landscape - if it should be as it could seem to be.

The world must be completely insane if these series are based on my life and work and nobody says a word about it but wait for me to tidy up in this.

The question is whether abuse of children should be allowed as a source of power. Most - or all - people agree that it should not. But the problem is that if abuse of a child's respect for and confidence in its custody parents be abused by agent parents on behalf of the state, it will produce power for the state in such a way that the state receives the confidence and respect in the international space which parents normally are expected to receive from the children they have the custody for. But that would be abuse of the most fundamental social relations and a very heavy burden such cynicism would be for the future of the human culture.

When my application for political asylum was rejected in 2002, would that have been because the french authorities took confidence in and nourished respect for the norwegian representation they could have spoken with?

I add that in the moment when I had completed DDS part IV, Mount Everest trembled from an earthquake with epicentre in Nepal. It is possible to compute in such a way that pope Benedict's resignation can be seen as being a part of the completion of part I. Of course the earthquake at the end of part IV could have been artificial, it could even have been for plans on abusing my book, although of course it could have been natural as well. If 'The Dynasty' of 2017 were based on my DDS, there is even the tacit potential link between the attempt on the pope in 1981 to this story decades later. But I know little or nothing about whether this is a possible background.

When I had completed this study of Horace's poetry relative to my DDS in february 2022, I soon developed an oedema around one of the eyes which made me look like the front page of my DDS. This has recurred a few times since then. I notice also this brief observation.

Part 3

Are there now plans of squeezing me out of my home - for landing on the street or even worse? Isnt there somebody who can wring some money out of the plagiarisms and their perpetrators - enough for me to be able to buy my own home? Abusive power does not want that, of course, since they want to have me under their dependency - which is what turns the roles efficiently and makes my poetry look miserable while their own initiatives look magnificent and they could harvest confidence and respect all around.

Are there plans of having me 'fit for fight' instead of an explanation and apologies from those who organized the intrigue? Such a 'fit for fight' solution would of course lead to only bad culture around the world, in particular where material based on abuse of my life and work has been present in the media. That is no good solution. The best solution is to allow me to be maximally independent of power intrigues. I would of course ideally have preferred a political asylum in 2002, a (taxfree) pension and a place to live - and hopefully power representatives would not crowd more or less clandestinely around me - and an end to all this abusive culture would then have been much easier to obtain. That of course would have been much better for the culture of the entire world community.

I cannot probably under such circumstances as these outlined here have a housing loan in a bank without the bank almost automatically shooting forth in the market and I be thrown into disease. Some time ago I looked up 'the 10 biggest banks of Europe' on the web and it turned out that all or many of the banks where I had had an account in recent decades were among the top 10. Now I looked up the same again and the list looked somewhat different - only two of them were now among the top 20 or so - but it may perhaps be a matter of how to count. There was the story of my PO Box that was closed (even if I had sent enough money) when I was in Italy and when I returned the Erste Bank had closed a savings account of mine because I had not answered a letter they had sent to it. I suppose a housing loan can be terminated as well if one does not answer a letter - and if that be the case of course the bank quickly can shoot forth in the market. In another story I asked the Nordea Bank to send me what was on my norwegian account (which could have been a sort of application) and it took 4 weeks before the money arrived - and I fell somewhat ill in the mean time. (I needed the money transferred for buying a house in Hungary, but I dont remember how long before I bought the one in Szolnok that it was - some weeks or months maybe). It is only by official recognition of my particular background that some progress can be made - ideally including tax freedom due to early head opening in 1957. But of course the power could feel that they would rather prefer to not admit any abuse of data from my life or work.

I have here not touched upon the issue whether 'The Dynasty' of 2017 could have been produced because of my request for money transfer from Nordea to Erste. (The Prigoshin aircrash recently took place in the Tver Oblast).

I believe my work is of importance and that I should be given a chance to continue that. But that requires some independence from vulnerability to intrigue.

See also 9 may 2023 for the turkish earthquakes that seemed to encode a poem from my other german poetry book - the 'synchronic' book 'SNEEFT COEIL' that complements the 'diachronic' book 'Der Dornenstrauch'. See also this file.

28/8-2023: Evening: I published this article about the helicopter (gunships) around noon (12:00) local Vienna time today - it was completed in translation in the early morning. I don't know when this ad for 'Crunchips' came up on a tramstop shed today - I took the photo in the afternoon at 15:38 local time. The advertisement business and other media have of course no access to my private and/or unpublished data and if they nevertheless should have acquired or abused any such, the authorities must terminate those businesses efficiently. Europe would do well in terminating all advertisement in public space. All abuse of my private data must of course be stopped. A private person can normally not discover such abuse before it is all too late and therefore public authorities should stop it.

29/8-2023: My private manuscripts (including backups) must of course not leak out in any form - it is well possible that such leaks are a part of the cause of the situation in Ukraine today - and therefore it is also well possible that it would be wise to use antiterror methods for stopping such abuse before the situation comes to look like Ukraine today.

As far as I remember, the bank I used in Norway around 1981 was 'Kreditkassen' which later was merged with other banks into the current 'Nordea Bank'. It is possible that "The Dynasty I" from 1981 onwards could have been based on (or conceivable as) the concept of 'skrev[t] dikt [på] assen' = 'wrote poems [on] the behind' while "The Dynasty II" from 2017 - at least according to the intro logo - could have been more about 'no drea bakn' = 'now screwed she the behind'. I know little about this, but if the matters should be of this character, the conclusion to this could be that I cannot take up a loan in a bank without risking my health. But shouldn't that mean that I am handicapped in this sense of it under the current socio-economic system and should have the right to an economic reparation which could make it possible for me to acquire my own home?