Communication 2025 with lawyer Torjusen at Centrum Advokatkontor

Communication 2025 with lawyer Torjusen at Centrum Advokatkontor

John Bjarne Grover

On 2 october 2025 I received an email with a letter attached (which I also later got by post) from lawyer Torjus Torjusen at Centrum Advokatkontor in Fredrikstad, Norway. It concerned a scheduled advance inheritance from the official mother and he asked for my bank account details for the transference. My reply email of 3 october 2025 told that it would be unwise of me to agree to accept such a 'gift' and I did not communicate to him my bank account details. On 11 february 2026 it was nevertheless registered on my norwegian bank account that the sum (1690354,50 NOK) had gone into my account, something which I discovered on 20 february 2026 - and on 21 february 2026 I was informed by the bank that the money had been sent by (or from) 'Centrum Advokatkontor' (whether that meant that it was sent from their bank account or if it only was their name in the commentary field, I dont know). Here is the email from Centrum Advokatkontor and the attachment to it with the letter:

torjus@centrumadvokatkontor.no
To: me · Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 1:11 PM

Vedlagt følger mitt brev av i dag som også er sendt per post.

Med hilsen

Centrum Advokatkontor

Torjus Torjusen
advokat
48 100 420
torjus@centrumadvokatkontor.no

The ATTACHMENT:
Click here for the letter (email) of 2 october 2025 from lawyer Torjusen at Centrum Advokatkontor in Fredrikstad

And here is my reply email of the following day, which I wrote soon after having found the email (there is a translation by translate.google.com of this into english in this former version of the present document):

Re: Arveforskudd
To: torjus@centrumadvokatkontor.no · Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 1:25 PM

Deres ref. 25-094

Til Centrum Advokatkontor

Jeg takker for brev.

På bakgrunn av johnbjarnegrover.com/occipitaldetail.jpg dette magnet-scan-bildet av mitt hode (2012), som viser at en del av synslappen er klippet bort mens skallen er intakt, som betyr at det må ha skjedd mens jeg var i mine første måneder i 1957, samt johnbjarnegrover.com/evidence.htm disse dataene som viser at det sannsynligvis dreier seg om noe politikk, samt johnbjarnegrover.com/replacedfatherstory.htm denne historien som betyr at Ragna Grøver var med på å bytte ut den første faren med en ny som aldri fortalte sin identitet men brukte den forrige farens navn (jeg ble ikke informert på forhånd), samt hennes såkalte bilulykke i 1981 omkring attentatet på paven som i prinsippet kan ha vært et person-bytte (jeg besøkte henne på sykehuset etter ulykken - hun hadde et rent og åpent skalpell-snitt tvers over pannen - man kunne putte fingertuppen inn - som var gjort av lege, ikke av bil, samt at hun kanskje var litt rundere rundt hoftene etterpå), er det kanskje ikke usannsynlig at hun ikke har autentisk identitet og derfor strengt tatt ikke er den juridiske eier av eiendommen. Det er på bakgrunn av hele historien at det ikke er fornuftig å motta en slik presang fra 'Ragna Grøver'. Jeg har gjettet (men har ikke fått noen opplysninger) at begge foreldrene kan ha arbeidet for statens etterretningstjeneste med meg som 'prosjekt' for å skape makt for staten. Jeg hadde noen konsultasjoner med terapeut Per Mentzen (i Oslo) i 1982 (eller 1983) og han fortalte at 'begge foreldrene var avhengige' (var agenter?) og at jeg 'ikke hadde fått nok kjærlighet som barn' (var utsatt for grov barnemishandling?) og det var ikke så mye å gjøre med det. Foreldrene har innrømmet at jeg nesten døde av et allergisk anfall i 1958 eller 1959 (sannsynligvis ca. 18 måneders alder) men de hevder at jeg hadde gjort det selv - puttet en nøtt i munnen. (Jeg selv vil kunne tro - har spekulert på bakgrunn av lite empiri men noen personlige erfaringer - at det kanskje kan ha vært den aller groveste form for tortur - for å skape makt for staten). Mentzen døde 3-4 år senere - 'innhentet av en farlig sykdom', som det sto i nekrologen i Aftenposten.

Fru Grøver var også formelt ansvarlig for tvangsinnleggelsen av meg på sinnsykehus i 1999-2000 - det var gjort på grunnlag av hennes signatur - men jeg hadde ikke hatt noen kontakt med henne siden 1988 - unntatt to korte telefonsamtaler i 1993, og det var derfor ikke tilstrekkelig kontakt til at man kunne bruke hennes signatur som grunnlag for tvangsinnleggelse. I de to telefonsamtalene i 1993 dreide det seg om et forskudd på arv (100.000 kroner) etter 'John Grøver' som offisielt døde i 1990 - når jeg forsøkte å heve sjekken hun sendte var det ikke dekning på kontoen så jeg lot det være. Jeg mottok allikevel pengene som uformell erstatning (de hadde da vokst til 125.000) etter at jeg slapp ut fra sinnsykehuset og måtte rømme fra landet og derfor måtte gi bort mine eiendeler som sikkert kostet like mye. Advokaten den gangen (som hjalp meg ut av sinnsykehuset) fortalte at det ikke var noen vits i å overprøve tvangsbehandlingen i retten. Jeg skulle hatt min doktorgrad godkjent i 1998 men ble tvangsinnlagt i 1999 ('i stedet') mens Gro Harlem Brundtland ble sjef for WHO (i 1998). Det var ingen grunn til å tro at jeg var farlig for meg selv eller andre.

Jeg har ikke nok grunnlag for å spekulere på om de to søstrene også kunne være kopier. Hvis det skulle ha vært tilfelle, kunne det tilmed tenkes at jeg (teoretisk) kunne betraktes som den eneste egentlige eieren av boligen - og i så fall kunne historien ha vært en politisk ide om 'auto-fellatio' - noe som kan ha vært konseptet for utbyttingen av den første faren mens vi ventet i bil på Vikebukt fergeleie i 1969 (ikke langt fra Måndalen - nå kalt 'Voll' - ved Åndalsnes) - 'fella til ho...' - faren sa 'e må pisse' og gikk bak et skur og en annen mann kom tilbake. Dette kan ha vært konseptet for 'Jimmy Carter' (James Earl Carter) og Walter Mondale i 1976. Mondale fortalte i norske medier at hans familie kom fra Måndalen. Utskiftingen av faren skjedde antagelig omkring tiden for den første månelandingen - men selv i dag er det vel vanskelig å sende noen til månen og tilbake igjen.

De verste teoriene sier at den andre faren kan ha vært Adolf Hitler, moren kan ha vært Heinrich Himmler, den eldste søsteren kunne være von Ribbentrop og den yngste John F.Kennedy (hence Carter/Mondale), men det sier seg selv at det ikke er noen vits i å påstå noen realitet i slike teorier uten å vite noe.

Det ville derfor ikke være fornuftig å ta imot en presang fra fru Grøver. Det er vel fornuftigere å vente på en billighetserstatning fra staten. Jeg har ikke noen mening om hvorvidt det kan være realistisk eller ikke.

John Bjarne Grover
Pf.15
1152 Wien
Austria

Lawyer Torjusen (Centrum Advokatkontor) thereafter (25 days later) returned the following email to which I did not answer, since I had communicated my stance:

torjus@centrumadvokatkontor.no
To: me · Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 1:29 PM

Hei, og takk for din e-post av 3. oktober 2025.

Du skriver at det ikke vil være fornuftig å ta imot en presang fra fru Grøver.

Som nevnt skal arveforskudd utdeles med lik del til hver livsarving, jf. arveloven § 24. Jeg tillater meg å be deg revurdere ditt standpunkt, og opplyse ditt kontonummer slik at arveforskuddet kan utbetales deg.

Med hilsen

Centrum Advokatkontor
Torjus Torjusen
advokat
48 100 420
torjus@centrumadvokatkontor.no

*****************************

I agree that the evidence in the MRT scan johnbjarnegrover.com/occipitaldetail.jpg may be weak or even nothing if the effect is due to an uneven curling inwards of the lower part of the occipital lobe.

I have to correct an inaccuracy: I wrote that I "had no contact with her since 1988 - except for two short telephone conversations in 1993". That is not entirely correct: I was in the alleged father's funeral in 1990 and it may be that his wife was also present but I kept a distance and had no contact with her there. In the autumn 1994 she was also on my door and I was foolish enough to open it to give her a chance to confess but she had no confession to present - only a brief choice she presented - whether I wanted "plums from the garden or father's anorak". I closed the door again and should not have opened it. A last time in the spring 1995 she tried to block for my progress in the street but I ran past her and mumbled 'go to hell' into the roadside (I did not communicate that to her - and if that should be her trump card today it would be only for claiming that I had taken up contact with her, which is not true). She also sent numerous letters (all in all at least a dozen, maybe two dozen) to 'John Bj.Grøver' ('Arne Treholt' = 'Arne Grove[r]' had in 1985 been sentenced for espionage and high treason) which I returned unopened to sender all of them before I understood (in probably the second half of the 1990's) that it could have meant a sort of 'contact' for her (as if I 'handed over information to her') and I therefore had to start demolishing them unopened and unread. I have never read any communcation from her since 1988 (except for the letters from lawyer). Clearly this is not sufficient for a forced hospitalization to psychiatric treatment: The norwegian law (at least in those days) said, as far as I remember, that 'regular contact' ('jevnlig kontakt') was a requirement for such a signature from a next-of-kin to be a valid basis for a forced psychiatric hospitalization and in 1999 that could not be said to apply.

I add that the official father 'John Grøver' was born 'John Jensen' on 27 october 1916.

There are three peculiar linguistic points in the letter from the lawyer of 2 october 2025:

1) 'UndertegeNde' should be 'undertegNede' (= 'signed') - an outright typing error.
2) 'Som følge av det er inngått avtale' should normally be 'Som følge av AT det er inngått avtale'
3) 'Ragna Augusta Devold Grøver ønsker å gi lik del arveforskudd til hver av sine 3 livsarvinger' would normally have been expected to be 'Ragna Augusta Devold Grøver ønsker å gi lik del AV arveforskudd(ET) til hver av sine 3 livsarvinger' - but it may be that not all norwegians would insist on that.

The money was sent to my bank account registered as arrived there on 11 february 2026. They will be returned to the sender.

The norwegian letters can probably be reasonably well translated with translate.google.com.

There was a school shooting in a student library in Tumbler Ridge in Canada on 10 february 2026 by a 'Jesse Van Rootselaar'. There could have been a possible background in an event in (most probably) 1977 when I worked in a library where 'Jette Råboe Larsen' (cp. similarity of name) was leader of the department - we two were present when the official mother Ragna Grøver knocked on the door before opening time and I went to open the door and she came in (I cannot remember what the communication was).

22/2-2026:

Further comments

In light of the typing error 'undertegende', I could ask myself: What is a 'tege'? To me that means the theme of my high school biology teacher Tore Lauvstad for his master degree in biology, according to what he told the class. 'Tege' is a sort of small beetles or bugs. Lauvstad has (or had) his house on a hill up from the house of Ragna Grøver - which hence is sort of 'under-tege-nde' in the sense of being 'under' the theme of his MA thesis. It is because the 'small bugs' in the letter from the lawyer could happen to be significant that I could mention this. What could the small 'bugs' tell? Well, if N-AT-(av) are the three most prominent, there could be the sense 'NATT AV...' = 'night of...'. A night of something? Should this be 'crystal clear'? (I cannot take this as evidence that Ragna Grøver should have been involved in Heinrich Himmler's 'Kristallnacht'). I had a dream in the night to 14 february 2026 - which was after the money had gone into my bank account but before I had discovered them - which perhaps could be telling: The dream was from a two-storey house - or at least a house with two floors somehow - I was looking from the upper floor over a balustrade down onto the ground floor where there were a lot of crocodiles - all of them green except for one that was red. ['Redd' is norwegian for 'afraid' while 'felles' - cp. 'fearless' - is 'common']. On my way out of the house I met my official uncle Bjørn, the brother of my official mother. It happened once in Oslo (probably in the first half of the 1980's) that I was in need of finding a place to live and looked over the houseletting ads in 'Aftenposten' and telephoned (from a telephone box near the National Theatre, I think it was) on one of them - it happened to be my official uncle Bjørn who took the phone - as far as I remember he said he was letting out his house in the outskirts of Oslo called 'Rød' (= 'red') or something like that - at least I think that was the name or a part of the name. He said (maybe on some later occasion - a funeral or something) that he had built the house himself - I recall also the family visiting him while he built his own house on 'Bogneset' near or in Ålesund. (But that was while it was still in the beginning - didnt we visit him on a later occasion as well - when the house was nearly finished? I think so, but dont remember this well - maybe that was in Oslo - I recall he had just published a book which probably was this one and if that were in 1971 it was probably in Oslo). Now I cannot find 'Rød' (means 'red') on the map but I find 'Rødbergveien' in this part of Oslo (source) - it is intersected by 'Selvbyggerveien' = 'Self-builder-road', 'Ragna Nielsens vei' and other streets. The district seems to be called 'Kolås' which to all norwegians probably sounds like 'Kolsås' - that is outside Oslo and the main NATO representation or presence in Norway, I think it is. That would mean that an 'S' has dropped out. I recall this 'S' from the story from 1987 - it is told in my diary novel "The Dreamer" on page 129: "It was a huge S with three dots after and a circle around all of it: S..." Have the norwegians been planning this story as an intrigue since many decades ago? I recall the story of then PM Gro Harlem Brundtland whose son Jørgen Brundtland allegedly committed suicide when she was in Brussels and her husband was at a NATO meeting at 'Kolsås', if I remember right: A spoon on this NATO-Brussel makes for 'Nabo-Trussel' = 'threat from the neighbour'. If an 'S' drops out of the name of Jens Stoltenberg (who later was chief of NATO), there is the form 'jent oltenberg' left: 'Jente' = 'girl': A girl I knew in Oslo had planned to move to Majorstua but after some deliberation (I hope it were not that I did not feel comfortable there since there could be certain people there?) she moved to (if I remember right) Linderudsletta ('Linde-rus-letta' could mean 'relief from the intoxication of Lind') close to 'Rødbergveien' instead. There was later this 'Orderud Paust' case where 'Grønnerød' was one of the four convicted persons: He lived at Majorstua, I think the news told. 'Grønne-rød' means 'Green-red' - cp. my dream. The story was that Anne Orderud Paust and her husband Per Paust ('Anne and Per' were also the names of two people I knew in Oslo) came back from USA and he had acquired cancer and eventually died on 6 may 1999. Anne Orderud Paust had been personal secretary to the norwegian defence ministers since 1985, I think it was (that was anyhow after I had moved back to Oslo after Austmarka), and she was in 1999 still the personal secretary to the defence minister - and this 6 may 1999 was in the middle of NATO's Kosovo bombing campaign. On the following day 7 may 1999 there was Per Bøthun - a norwegian highlevel military commander - who was on duty as leader of this bombing campaign when NATO dropped a bomb on the chinese embassy in Belgrade. Of course normal human logic put 2 and 2 together for the idea that this could have been an intrigue from the personal secretary of the norwegian defence minister - as 'revenge' onto the 'other side' for the death of her husband the day before - this logic was later reinvoked with the news that she herself (along with her two parents) were shot dead 15 days later - on 22 may 1999 when she was visiting her parents at Orderud farm - it was an intruder who shot them. Of course human logic once again put 2+2 together for the idea that the bombing of the chinese embassy (when Per Bøthun was commander of the campaign) was such a scandal and if it could be traced to her, it could have been norwegian security who shot her (including her parents who happened to be present), but this never came up in the news which all focused on her brother who lived not so far away. He and his wife were sentenced along with Grønnerød and his girlfriend - a 'quartet'. I think Per Bøthun was pensioned off not so long thereafter. All this big complex could of course find a theoretic anchorpoint (at least as far as my person is concerned) in the name of Lars Grønnerød on background of my telephone for this houseletting - who turned out by surprise to be my uncle Bjørn Eidsvig. (I did not rent his house). As far as I remember, the ad told that the price for the renting of the house was 'ikke urimelig' = 'not unreasonable', while 'u-rimelig' could also refer to a refridgerator that cannot be defrosted - hence it could mean that 'the refridgerator is not undefrostable'. The official father used to defrost the refridgerator (that is, melting off the ice that had accumulated around the icebox) regularly.

There was also a puzzling story from Bergen 1995 - I had come there to start university stipend work and needed a place to live - I called for an ad on houses for rent and a man with a northern dialect took the phone and described the place as 'meget luksuriøst' (very luxurious). Could it have been an offer (or rather 'hint') for becoming an agent? I did not take it to mean so in those days (and I have never been an agent) - and I did not take that housing either. Helge Dyvik, who was then scheduled to be my scientific supervisor, had a somewhat similar voice and dialect - I dont know if it could have been him. The name of 'Jørgen Brundtland' spoons to 'Bergen Jr. undtland' - 'under han' = 'under him', while 'uten land' = 'without country' (without citizenship?). As far as I remember, Jørgen Sejersted had office next to me in Allégaten 34 in Bergen - I think I remember that a phone calling in there (when he was not present) had a quite impressive effect on me - and once it felt like falling into a tomb with a strong smell of excrements (= 'bruntland'?). ('Jeg er sørgenstedt' could mean 'I am buried' - but there would be no smell of excrements inherent in that rewrite). Gro Harlem Brundtland experienced a setback in her career with the death of her son, told the news, which perhaps could be called that it 'fellet hon' (with swedish taint in the 'hon') = 'feleton', as a possible spoon on 'telephone'. I knew Sejersted's father from the 'TMV centre' in Oslo - it is that complex around TEAR-MEAR-UEAR close to the story of the 'cursor jump' at 25.9.94 in my diary novel from 1994-95 which in theory could have been behind the 'XP' label of the Windows version that came a few years later - and from there to the giant stockmarket bubble of Microsoft these days (which now has gone beyond 4 trillion dollars). My personal theory is that it is my theoretic work of 1992-93 (at Sejersted's 'TMV centre') which later gave the theoretic basis for my theories of (see e.g. this article on the topic).

But maybe the house in Oslo was not in Rødbergeien - could be it was on 'Rødtvet', is that possible? (I now find this information page which suggests that it could have been there). That is not so far away - it is a station on Grorudbanen. If so, it is possible that neighbouring streets could have served to invoke associations to the socalled octogon - I knew a ceramist who lived at Kalbakken, another element in my diary novel 'The Dreamer'. Tulla Elieson was a ceramist = 'potter' - cp. 'Pottemakerveien' at Rødtvet. I think Torleif Grue lived around Tonsenhagen or thereabout - cp. Tonsenhagen skole near 'Rødbergveien' (source).

In short, if this should be about a highlevel national intrigue trying to swap roles with me, it could have been about blaming me for the 'Octogon' qua 'treason against the state' - for being a dumpingplace for national problems. What sort of problem? Well, if Norway gave political asylum to Hitler and his government after the war, that could have been a scandal (which could be compared to moon landings?) But this is sheer speculation, of course: I dont know if they got asylum anywhere. And, as is seen, all of it would be contained in personal associations which normal administration cannot assign much value etc. How many 'bugs' are there in the letter from the lawyer?

I can add that the lawyer's signature reminds me of the signature of 'Trygve Tveterås' who along with Knut Stene Johansen and me made the highschool pamphlet 'Togtidende' (cp. 'Undertegende') - at the time, by the way, when Lauvstad was among the teachers. My own signature was of a different type - as far as I remember it said something like 'JOHИ GRØVEЯ 16½ ÅR' - suggesting perhaps that I was not responsible for all of it.

The question is whether all this complex could have been built up around the house I bought in Szolnok (including an 'annexe' and other outhouses) in 2015. The Oslo terror (2011) indexes the address with high precision and was on the front pages of international news on the same day as the news of the death of Amy Winehouse whose name in hungarian (for 'vinous') would be 'Amy Boros'. The Grøver family was for a holiday to 'Borås' (there was a zoological garden there) in Sweden in probably the late 1960's - the house in Szolnok was allegedly built in 1970 - we were otherwise hardly out of the country except for London in 1972 and maybe a short trip to the border to Sweden or just across it. Were we as far out as Gothenberg? I vaguely recall that. There was also a name 'Boros' associated with a neighbourhood in Szolnok. When I searched for a house in Szolnok there came also up an offer for a cheap house just on the other side of the railway station - something which resembled the location of 'Anne' when I came to know her. Could be there are many such 'vague associative links' - and it is far from certain that it makes sense to draw up connections between them - but my personal world necessarily have to see them. A few days before the new year 2025-2026 there were some firecrackers in the neighbourhood and then there was the fire in Crans-Montana during the new year celebrations at 01:30 on 1 january 2026 - would that count as 'NATO-Brussel' spooned to 'NABO-Trussel' = 'threat from the neighbour'? There is also the news these days about the anti-corruption organization NABU in Ukraine - which, if they find traces of corruption in Zelensky's administration, could come to overthrow the government there. I am not corrupt - but it could be that if the plan were that I should accept this offer for 1,7 million NOK, it could have been classified as a case of corruption? (See also my brief comments under 7 february 2026). Neither do I feel that there are any associative links of Zelensky to me - except perhaps for that 'selen' = 'the car belt' that seemed to have snapped on impact at the alleged frontal collision of Ragna Grøver in 1981, causing a 'blue mark' = 'blå-merke' on the back of her left shoulder. The neighbours - 'under' the 'tege'-masterdegree teacher - to the house in Fredrikstad (allegedly on sale, as told the lawyer's letter) were in those days called 'Blom' - and would that suggest 'Blom erke-' = 'Blom arch-'? 'Arch' what? There could even be inherent associations to names of Buckingham therein. There was also the story with Grue's then wife 'Herdis Eggen' who claimed that blue marks on her arm were because I had grabbed her there and shown her to the door when she refused to leave - but the marks were not where I had grabbed her so it was a sort of trick, it seemed. Are there associative links to Saul Bellow - such as his 'Bellarosa connection' - in this story (sheer speculation, this)? Etc etc. There have been 'news on the inner radio' of a 'billighetserstatning' of 5 million NOK from the state - but would that be the sales sum for the house in Fredrikstad? Etc etc.

In short, on background of my dream of 14 february 2026: I am not Hitler. (And my body height of 187-188 cm is probably more than Hitler). I am myself and have never been rebuilt. I remember back to the corridor in Brinken 2 on Kampen in 1958 and have verified the memory against the location. If anybody should have a false identity, that is not me.

Is all this fancy only - totally unrelated details from a personal life? The three former Labour PMs Gro Harlem Brundtland (NATO-Brussel), Jens Stoltenberg (NATO) and Torbjørn Jagland (suspected of corruption, tells the news) plus the Orderud Paust case are not only personal associations - but of course it is not at all certain that they are linked to me in any interesting way as far as this complex is concerned. Would Labour have been interested in partaking in a stockmarket bubble which can lead to a global crash - as in 1929 - untill Hitler took over in 1933? Then it could be that it is not only about personal associations. If Microsoft 'XP' were related to my diary novel of 1994-95, then it is even possible that the Kosovo bombing campaign could have been for pumping me up in preparation for the launch of Windows XP on background of e.g. 'The Dynasty' 1981 - something which again could be assigned some explanatory value on background of these considerations - whereby the COVID pandemic came to be a very exact repeat of the spanish flue 100 years earlier. If so, would a stockmarket crash be planned for 2029? Anne Karen Orderud married Per Olav Paust in 1992, tells this page.

It takes a lot of time, all this story. How much time have I now spent on writing out all these details? It is high time that the story be tidied up in. Were there ever anybody on the moon?