Matthew 15 and the political matrix since 1912

Matthew 15 and the political matrix since 1912

John Bjarne Grover

Modern political power since 1912 is much concerned with the role of names and other indexes. It is the matrix of Biagio Marin from Grado near Duino registering at the Faculty of Philosophy in Vienna when Rilke heard the voice of the angel from over the sea at Duino - not far from Grado - and Robert Falcon Scott (Robert 'Vollkornbrot') reached the South Pole - on 18 january 1912. Rilke sent his very fresh first elegy to the princess of Thurn und Taxis-Hohenlohe on 21 january 1912. It is probably common to put these three elements together in one single interconnected unit - and add Roald Amundsen on the South Pole some weeks earlier - when 'Roi La i mundsen' = 'the Lord put the bread in you mouth'. This is the complex with the two lapis philosophorums (the two poets) and the slice of Vollkornbrot - and the world of political and intelligence power has probably been concerned and thrilled with the idea that this explains how the Lord put the words from the voice of the angel into the mouth of Rilke for his first Duino elegy. Would that mean that the power of the Lord could get into the hands and control of the secret intelligences?

The story is from the University (or Universe) of Vienna and the Faculty of Reasoning Intelligently in Philosophy there. The story of the 20th century since 1912 seems to have been about combining this with the socalled Burgenland power phenomenon - which has been a mystery apparently making it possible to engineer much power across that border - combining Austria and Hungary. (This mystery of power was nothing new, of course, but has probably been a central european power riddle for centuries). In the article The hungarian evidence I have shown what this is about - and it is now possible to understand how the role of anglophony could be mixed up with the voice of the angel in the story of the philosophical matrix.

This furthermore inevitably links it to the role of the anglican church as a protestant church since the days of Henry VIII. What primarily makes this anglican church of London differ from the catholicism of Rome is, as far as I know, the issue of transubstantiation: The catholic church emphases and will not give up the view that the holy host, the eucharist, the consecrated biscuit (which, as suggest the elements of the story of the matrix, somehow is put onto the tongue by the Lord himself) is turned into the body of Christ in the moment when it glides down the gullet. The anglican protestants disagree with this and claim that it only means the body of Christ - it remains a trivial biscuit but it is consecrated and has the meaning of the body of Christ as such. But meaning is not the same as the flesh itself, they probably say.

It seems that there could have been some 'mock' - just like the anglophonic element in the Burgenland power phenomenon seems to exhibit - in the interpretations of the differences between the two versions of the christian creed - the anglican and the catholic. When the anglicans reject the transubstantiation, they could in 'mocking' manner defend this stance with claiming that the body of Christ - since Christ was both human and divine - means quite simply the flesh of the human body and that could contain hairs and sweat and normal human body dirt. They did not want to swallow such 'dirty body elements' - could have been a 'mock' version of the theological disagreement.

Christ could have commented on this himself - in Matthew 15 - when he tells that it is not what goes into the mouth that makes a human dirty, it is what goes out of it.

However that be, the 'mock' stance that could have enhanced the Burgenland power resource for the 'intelligences' and other political interests could have been simply the slogan that 'Rome is dirty'. This could have been installed into a political intrigue by way of a strategy on the socalled 'roma' people - by creating rumours that these were 'dirty' or otherwise morally insufficient the intrigue could have managed to increase the reputation and confidence of people to the 'secret intelligences' to the same extent that the reputation and confidence of people to the 'roma' people could have gone down.

In Norway, the correlate to the 'roma's (or maybe it even were the same group?) were called 'tatere' - and it is easy to see how intrigue by way of 'Tats' of various sorts from the 'secret intelligences' could have served to even increase the normal people's confidence in these 'secret intelligence services' - the more dirty the 'Tats' the more confidence and admiration these 'services' could have harvested from normal people.

Formerly women worked in the groceries and apothecaries, but now it seems that some of these DAUGHT-ers of the people are pressed out of their normal workspaces and males take their places. The TATers of the people!

Clearly this mechanism arises from the inavailability of the 'lapis philosophorum' for the average people's knowledge. It is not impossible that the current flooding of male employees in many traditional female workspaces has a comparable effect which even could have a taint of blasphemy about it - by the correlation of Christ and the idea of 'fellatio' in '69' etc - the effect of which perhaps could be compared with sexual abuse of children - it is likely that children often do not experience the damage to their life before many years or decades have elapsed. If people cannot defend themselves against it because they do not have access to the knowledge of the 'lapis philosophorum' which could have been defining for the matrix of 1912, then they could even come to feel that they have to exit from the christian church in order to avoid blasphemy as the alternative.

If students in schools and universities were informed about the 'lapis philosophorum', there is no danger that this should weaken their christian faith - on the contrary, it probably could be a strong reinforcement of the faith and the moral strength therein.

Added on 30 august 2018:

It is of course possible that the new rumanian-hungarian border (from Trianon-Versailles 1920) which landet Transylvania in Rumania was made in order to have Cluj shifted over to the rumanian side of the border in the 'transubstantiation' of Transylvania - for making the ROMA people be the motor in the engineering of the Burgenland power phenomenon. Baia Mare likewise landet on the rumanian side of the new border - could have been about Biagno Marin. Oradea = the words from the angel, etc. The Tatra region of Slovakia likewise was a part of Hungary before 1920.

Matthew 15 contains the mystery of a paradox (concerning what goes out of the mouth) which not easily is understood in translation but which contains a greek puzzle in verse 5 in the form 'ophelethes' = ωφεληθησ which has a iota subscriptum on the last eta. ('Opheleo' = 'to provide service', 'to benefit'). It can, as far as I can find, be part of probably three forms:

1) aorist passive subjunctive 2nd person singular - the proper form
2) future passive 2nd person singular = less certain, it has an extra η = eta
3) aorist passive participle ωφεληθεισ which, though, probably should be in the class of root aorists and probably could come out with such a form - but only in the masculine gender, not in the neuter

δωρον = neuter for 'gift', 'handbreadth' (hebr. 'tefach' = handbreadth)
δωρων = masculine for 'always promising a gift' (in the future, that is)

Hence a ('Gramatneusiedel'?) shift from verb to noun could have taken place beyond the horizon ('aoristos') of the sensible world ('the visible world') - which even could be part of the geography of political power? ('Providing service' in 'the invisible world'?) Jesus extended his palm when he gave food to 5000 hungry people - after he had given thanks to his Father in Heaven - crediting the source with words out of the mouth.

An interesting question is whether the treaty of Grand Trianon in 1920 could have been about the 'adamantoid' structure of 48 equal triangles, a property of diamond crystal. That is 'the diamond of Raimund' of Capua when he tells of the ring which St.Catherine of Siena got in her mystical marriage when Jesus himself extended his hand and put the ring on her finger.

I add the aspect of norwegian language - if 'the TATers of the people' changes into 'the people of the taters' - like 'likestilling mellom kjønna' ('equivalence among the genders') alternates with 'kjønna mellom likestilling' = 'the genders between the equivalences'.

Jungmayr, Jörg: Die Legenda Maior (Vita Catharinae Senensis) des Raimund von Capua. (Text, translation, comments). Weidler, Berlin 2004.