My diary novel 1994-95, Manhattan 2001, Gaza 2008, pope 1981

John Bjarne Grover

Some words on overtime about a novel I wrote in 1994-95 and which could have been stolen from my computer in 1999 and been a part of the attack on USA 11 September 2001 - and even a possible part of the background for the attack on Gaza 2008-2009. Plus a discussion of the periodical 'Modern Language Review' which seems to constitute a national british responsibility claim on terror throughout a century - it has existed since Visthouse was built. There is also a discussion of the titles from this periodical July 1918 as the likely contents of the attempt on Lenin in August 1918 - and the basis for the construction of the apparent Ehamgasse project in Vienna. There is also a very interesting analysis of the case of Gandhi 1948 and the Kennedy assassination 1963 - leading up to the power of the present day - and the Lockerbie bombing 1988 which seems to allow for some conclusions on the nature of the periodical which I analyze and the role of british administration in those stories. Often when one considers cases of terrorism it seems to be impossible to come to any definite conclusions as to who organized it - since a part of the strategy often can be to dump the blame on somebody else by way of 'apparent responsibility' - but this article brings evidence from the periodical which for example can be taken to be conclusive as to a british responsibility claim on e.g. the Lockerbie bombing. If so, one can conclude with some certainty that british state terrorism exists. It seems - from an analysis of MLR April 1970 - to have included the murders of Sachs and Celan. The article ends with a discussion of the possible reasons for this phenomenon of british state terrorism - in a historic development going back to the renaissance and the middle ages. The article also seems to make it possible to end up with something close to certain proof that the holocaust was organized from London: The MLR seems to have presented responsibility claims (discussed towards the end of the article) to the main death camps responsible for at least half of the 6 million jewish death during WWII. The article in its present 'drafty' form is more 300 ordinary book pages. There is a conclusion of a few lines in larger types at the end.

Clinton was to an official visit to Norway in the autumn 1999. There is the story with the forced hospitalization of me on 1963 JFK assassination day 22 November 1999. I was taken to the hospital by three police (in fact I associated these somewhat with three of the employees at 'NMI of the state', including Oppeböen and Hansen) who came on my door along with a psychiatrist with name Johan F.Krohn who denied me to lock the door with my security key, and so it was possible to enter while I was away. I had not changed the cylinder in the normal lock, as far as I remember - it was not necessary when I had a security lock (the one I had was of ASSA type). When I returned briefly the next day for getting some things, there was a menu left for me on the computer screen - I had not seen it before and it disappeared when I touched the mouse. It looked home-made. Which sort of told me that the hard drive had been emptied while I was locked away in the hospital over the night. Some days later, The Times (at least the one I bought in Bergen) brought a full-page report from Clinton's Camp David dinner menu, surrounded by a lot of small johngrover-stores over the page. As if somebody had 'touched the mouse' ('bedside' story?) and there went the dinner out the other way. In the police car I had asked the names of the three police and at least one of the names was very unlikely - it appeared to be three names which told of a date in my diary novel 1994-95, including the type of reference one could find in JFK jr's last issue of his magazine 'George' when one can read a sort of 'granny Smith' out of it - a governor 'Smith' in some 'granny' sort of place or something like that. The three names, which I wrote in my notebook, were Smith, Sönnesy and Lyssand. The second of these could hardly pass as a norwegian name, at least it sounds strange to me ('Sönstebö' is a usual name, though, but he did not say that, as far as I could determine), but one recognizes the three names from the following passage in the novel (see also discussion towards the end of this article):

2.3.95: Dream last night: I am in an auditorium. Granny Smith is lecturing on the self and the soul. She is speaking about the other, aand tries to show that the other is oneself.
        Grand applause. Wet eyes. People are moved into the inner of their souls. She rises from the chair and goes to the back of the room. Then she comes back with a white fur, in particular a longhaired collar on the hood of it. Applause again. People are moved and touched. She smiles faintly in her white skin and leaves the auditorium.
        Later, I am near the road to Kringsjå student town, where I once lived. It is winter, but in order to refrain from going into the house I am living in, I decided to sleep outdoors. I lie down in the roadside. There is a little heap of snow and ice to the left, to separate me from the road. A lamppost above my head, white light shines over me. I lie on a bed of white sand.

I can add the story that one of the police, when the door had been opened and they presented their errand and I argued that I was not ill, one of the police lifted his hands behind his neck - as on the photo of Per Böthun in Aftenposten (at least the one I bought in Bergen) behind his desk after the bombing of the Chinese embassy. I remember I thought that the police tried to signal that they may have been mistaken but that they had to follow order. I think this was the same person as in the back room of the police car who also told me the three names.

The story with my diary novel manuscript goes via a few dates and a calendarial telescope factor which is not so far from the hypothetical '567' factor of Vibeke Gröver Aukrust:

1) Hitler's postcard was written on 7 January 1924 and poststamped the day after. It seems to have been a responsibility claim on the death of Lenin some days later.
2) Charles de Gaulle died on 7 November 1970.
3) Bjarne Eidsvig was born officially on 6 July 1899 - apparently the reference in the Dreyfus case - and George Walker Bush shares birthday with him 47 years later.
4) Celan seems to have visited me in Odda on 3 September 1960.
5) An injection of 'Mengele' chemicals in Hammerfest could have been on 20 January 1959.

One adds to this 47 year of Bush the Air Egypt crash at 0047 in the night when summer time changes to winter time and when Clinton was going to Norway early next morning. The airplane allegedly described an 'N' in the air before it crashed at either 0147 or 0047.

There are 562 months from Hitler's postcard to the death of de Gaulle, and there are 562 days (plus a day, cp. 7-8 January) from the birthday of Bush and Eidsvig on 6 July 1959 - the summer when Celan and his friends met in Sils Maria and Celan wrote his 'Gespräch im Gebirg' - to the day of the inauguration of John F.Kennedy on 20 January 1961, which was 2 years after 20 January 1959 which was in the mid point of Eisenhower's period. Which means that the mid point of this period could be associated for me with the concept of Dr.Verboten via the phenomenon of my 11th birthday being the mid point in the governmental period of Per Borten 1965-1971. But in 1959 I could have been the victim of the chemicals personally, and in 1968 I was rather the victim of the other interpretation of the name of Per Borten in the sense of 'Pair Abortin' - the death of the two parents in 1970 after the introduction of the postcodes in Sweden on 12 May 1970.

Now the reason why 562 could be an interesting number is the car number T-262 on Gröver/'Mengele's car which was acquired in Odda, probably in the summer 1960. It means a turn-around of the 5 into 2, as in the T. If one counts 562 days backwards from 3 September 1960 when Celan was in Odda, one comes to the day 50 January (which means 19 February), which with a turn-around of the 5 gives the day of the hypothetical injection of the chemicals. The phenomenon seems to be also in the Oslo Report where there is mention of 'April 40' - meaning April 1940 but it looks like May 10. The day 3 September 1960 would also have been the 666th day of my life if I were born on 7 November 1958, 12 years before the death of de Gaulle. These 12 years recur in a number of decisive intervals:

1) From the handshake of the german emperor and the russian tsar in Björkö 1904 to the official birth of Gröver/'Mengele'. Is that an important event? I notice the name of Johannes Hahn in Austria as an example of how it could be of some importance.

2) From the death of PAS to the twin bombing of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania which could be a representation of the circular 'dancing' motion of the laser on my forehead for making a third eye 'kenya' - and representing also 'My pet goat', the book read by the schoolchildren in Sarasota on 11 September 1960. It is from this forehead 'vagina' that the mythological birth or rebirth of PAS could be thought to take place - as a son-of-man. I later went in some therapy at Per Mentzen, as if there had been some haemorrhage due to lasering.

3) From the death of the pope in 1958 to the afternoon walk with Gröver/'Mengele' passing yellow roses in Colbjörnsensgate in 1970 - it is likely that even this was 12 years. At least it was in October since I made mention of the yellow roses, as probably was the point with the walk, and Gröver/'Mengele' added: "'Gule roser i oktober' sounds like the title of a crime book" (italian 'giallo'). 'Rule goser' could be about 'Gosnia-Herzebovina' on the other side of the Adriatic sea relative to Rome.

Now this means that the birthday complex makes sense relative to the date of Celan's visit only on the assumption that 5 = 2, and that is the key to the categorization issue in the 'keys to heaven'. Could be the reason why my fantasy friend Gori was called just so? Not really the reason, although this could have been reconstructed later as the reason due to the death of de Gaulle: The real reason would have been in the impossibility of uniting the roles of Celan and Gröver/'Mengele' for which reason only a 'categorial interface' could have been referred to. That is also why I remember the meeting in terms of the 'rathunt' behind the house - as if I remember the police description made of the hypothetical pederast who even had left his name and address in the lodging of his short stay in Odda. 'Gori brun jakke og bukse' = 'Jackenhos'. Could be Ragna Gröver had seen us through the window and later reported to the police that the alien could have been a pederast - for example, "the child was very changed afterwards" or something like that. All this would be summed up in the formula 5 = 2, and that could have been the real reason for an assassination of de Gaulle on this day: It would have turned my fantasy friend Gori into a responsibility claim on the death of de Gaulle as 'the golden light over the water'. This would be about me as being born on 7 November 1958 - as being my own fantasy. One could therefore consider Gori to have been born on this date - and hence it was my idea. The GAS-PAS-GAS could be about PAS as Gori. It is only via 5 = 2 that one can reach this logic and that is why T-262 = 562 - months and days.

One adds to this the idea that if the combination of a rape on Christmas Eve 1957 by Adolf Hitler and Mengele chemicals in Hammerfest on e.g. 20 January 1959 is what makes for a very bad combination, the role of Bush could be take some of the effect out of this by taking the place of Hitler's 'birthday' (of son-of-man, that could mean) in the construction. But I don't know much about what this combination means - if it is worse than the events considered in isolation. But it could well be that the presence of Bush in the White House would have been felt as a relief for me for such reasons. But clearly then it could also have been about a swap of Bjarne and Aron Eidsvig's birthdays (if, this is, there were such mistreatment and if Aron Eidsvig was Adolf Hitler).

Hitler's postcard is therefore of essential importance for understanding this complex. Now the essential point to be observed relative to the manuscript to my diary novel 1994-95 is that it contains just these elements on the date 11 September 1994. The diary novel is much about the mystic language of car numbers which the author tries to decipher, and indeed he comes so far that he succeeds in predicting a few of them in advance. Here are the excerpts from 11/9-1994:

This lends a certain significance to the digit 8 adjacent to the 666-series. I mention this today only because I went downtown today to go to a café on Aker brygge. In the intersection of Olav V's street and Haakon VII's street (the previous king of Norway and his father, the king before that), there was a car with number KE 66680. Although I didn't notice anything particular with it, I still took it down just in case. It now looks interesting in light of the other two numbers yesterday.
Today's street names may be significant: The two former kings of Norway is of course reminiscent of the King-like signification of schizophrenia, which traditionally is called the King's disease. Crocus street, where I met the number DD 77766, is of course a flower name, just as Rosenkrantz street referred to roses yesterday.
Half an hour later: I grew a little restless (in fact, I felt that I should not have written the previous paragraphs), and went out for a walk. To have something to do, I went down to the kiosk at Tåsen to buy some peanuts. This is around one kilometer, or slightly less. Apart from the approx. two hundred well-known meters in the beginning of this walk, the rest of it is through pedestrian roads and over lawns and a little bridge, and there are no car registration numbers to be seen anywhere, except for the 50 meters from where I come out from the grove and down to the petrol station (the kiosk turned out to be closed). Having bought my peanuts, I went back up the same road again, and the first car I met had registration number KE 66673. This is extremely close to KE 66680, which I observed earlier today (in particular in light of the fact that these cars have been registered in some town far away from Oslo).

Hence 66680 and the king's disease - but that is the address on the postcard from 1924: "Rue de la Folie Regnaux 66/68". As far as I remember, 'Crocus Street' is close to 'Kongle-veien' ('Cone Street') which also can be deciphered 'kong-lev-eien' = 'the king's disease', sort of. One can notice that 'kone' is norwegian for 'wife'.

11 September 2001 seems to have been about just 'birthday' = 'Bush-dag': The Lambertsville crash was into a former diamond mine which combines with the one on Pentagon for the idea of injection of verboten 'crystalline' chemicals. Adding these 'balloons' to the 'funhattans' of the Manhattan, there is the birthday party. (I notice in parenthesis that Gro Harlem Brundtland - who was chief of WHO at the time of the attack - was born on Hitler's 50th birthday).

After the abduction of Betancourt, I got this 'balloon' feeling in the lefthand side of my body. I have wondered if this could be due to childhood memories - or if it could have been a result also of a 'third eye' mutilation which could have created a lateralization by the need for turning the front-back orientation into left-right for handling certain tasks cognitively.

Now the reason for this mention in my writings of 1994 is only that I did make these observations on that day, and it is not my fault that the car was parked just there on that day. However, after 11/9-2001, and after this day had been much in the news and after Bill Clinton ('bil nummer' = 'car number'), it would have looked like I had written this in 1994 because I knew of this date in advance. That of course is not the case, but it may well be the case that the date 11/9-2001 could have been chosen because of my manuscript from 1994.

The reality is not likely to be any of these: I suppose the date 11/9 could have been determined long before 1994, but that only tells what my book is about - it is an attempt to revitalize the genre of fiction. Genre not over. It is re-attached to reality (and is, for example, not the product of the hand that held the laser). It is a piece of fiction written in true time.

However, as seen from a political point of view, if the manuscript was stolen from my computer and was the contents of the 'Romanov' reference in the last airflight of JFK jr. 81 year earlier like the interval at the end of the Celan's 'Der Meridian', it could have been for precisely the purpose of this double reference to Bush and Clinton and the 'signature' function therein. It is this issue which could have been the centre of attention after I in november 2008 made the discovery of the same parallel hebrew text from the Erubin in this diary novel as in the last fourth of my The Endmorgan Quartet. A close study of this hebrew text relative to the manuscript from 1994-95 takes it to the point where 1) there is the discussion of the morph HAM and 2) there is the mention of that scene and time interval of 2 seconds which is the key to the relation between the music of Midori and my poetry in the last book "I tell you, Estunates". Therefore, if somebody should be worried about the potential and value in this discovery of november 2008 relative to this manuscript 1994-95, this would be the point where a hijack attempt likely would have been put if one were to arrange an attempted hijacking of my discovery. And if that should have been of any concern, one would likely search for a reason to it in the possible role of 11 September 2001.

This is what I had to consider with the news of the israeli attack on Gaza (cp. GAS-PAS-GAS) allegedly due to 'Hamas' (cp. HAM). I don't know the reasons for the bombing of the place and one certainly has to take into consideration the obvious possibility that this is a matter of coincidence and that the real reason was not related to my discovery at all. The question is whether my computer could have been tapped or not. If it were tapped, then the attack on Gaza could in theory have had such reasons, otherwise not.

I certainly do hope that the bombing of Gaza was not a 'publication' of my book manuscript, with a 'laser signature', so to speak.

But would Israel have been interested in hijacking my discovery? Probably not, but if England were out for taking the effect out of my discovery, and if the attack on Gaza were for such reasons, then one has to conclude that the attack was on behalf of another state.

The whole story is contained in the absence of an answer from the israeli embassy in Berlin in 2004. If they had answered with a letter saying "thanks for your interest in supporting the people of Israel" or something like that, I would not have moved away from Berlin (unless I would have been pressed down to Vienna in any case for the purpose of Ehamgasse) and I would not have considered the attempt to get an antenna through a hole in the wall into my flat as a potential 'answer' and things would perhaps have looked very different today. It is today not possible for me to find out of this vital question and that is why I have to wonder if the attack on Gaza could have been made on behalf of e.g. England. It is enough to take a look at the five election pledges of New Labour in 1997 to understand why it is a very possible interpretation that England wants to hijack my discovery by way of the state of Israel. In particular pledge #5 seems to say "NO zavat halav udewash" = 'NO land of milk and honey'.

Here are the five fundamental New Labour election pledges in England from The Times on internet in the spring 1997 soon after I had come to London in February 1997. Readers could, as far as I remember this Times excerpt from the web, respond to them by telephoning to the newspaper - or maybe it was to the party:

1. Cut class sizes to 30 or under for 5, 6 and 7 year- olds by using money from the assisted places scheme.
2. Fast-track punishment for persistent young offenders by halving the time from arrest to sentencing.
3. Cut NHS waiting lists by treating an extra 100,000 patients as a first step by releasing 100 million saved from NHS red tape.
4. Get 250,000 under-25 year-olds off benefit and into work by using money from a windfall levy on the privatised utilities.
5. No rise in income tax rates, cut VAT on heating to 5 per cent and inflation and interest rates as low as possible.

One can spot 30666 of Cole in #1 and the 'revelation' of Madonna Kursk in #2 - and the idea of 'fast-track punishment of young offenders' could be telling of just the background with me in the gap between the custody and genetic parents. And one can even spot the 567 of a hypothetical telescope factor for Vibeke Gröver Aukrust. In a letter from a lawyer dated 20 January 1993, the day of Clinton's inauguration for the White House, I was (just like my two official sisters) offered 100.000 norwegian money as a pre-inheritance. It is the day of the possible injection of 1959. One could even spot a Petter Andre Syversen = PAS in the fourth point. He lived in 'Frydenlund street' at the time of his death, if I got it right, cp. the death of Knut Frydenlund. For point 5, see Num.14,8 on 'zavat halav udewash' = 'flowing with milk and honey'. Hence #5 seems to say 'no land of milk and honey'.

It was perhaps a year or two after I had been to the embassy with the material which suggested that Gröver could have been Mengele that I found the book in a bookshop in Vienna with photos from the Auschwitz ramp wherein it looked as if it was Gröver/'Mengele' who was standing there sorting Jews. But the book was dated before I had been to the embassy. If the book had been antedated and this was the answer from the embassy - and I also found another photo book from Auschwitz with some strange photos which looked rather edited - one could perhaps believe that this was the 'answer' from the embassy.

This is the problem I have met a lot in recent years - that people act instead of using words if I inquire about something.

It was a bad feeling in 2004 but it was perhaps even worse in 2008 after I had given a copy of this "I tell you, Estunates" to the jewish museum in Athens. They said when they received it: "We will send you a letter of thanks". No letter arrived but there was paintworks arranged in the entrance room to the house where I lived etc. and I finally moved out before the end of June 2008 since I had the impression that that was the deadline for my security. The same had happened in the jewish library Prague in 2007 but I had not put much emphasis on it then. Now I wondered in Athens if this was a coordinated action, in particular after the bombing of Lebanon in 2006 after I had given two letters to the reception in the entrance room of the jewish community house in Vienna. The riots which broke out in Athens in late 2008 was after a policeman had shot a 15-year old in his stomach - cp. "confirmation of receipt of the buk" ('buk' = 'stomach').

It is likely that the british strategy is grandiose swindle on culturally defining historic documents, such as Rosetta stone, Dead Sea scrolls, Behistun wall, Beowulf, possibly even Diplomatarium and much else, through which they can re-define the historic origins and get historic truth under administrative control - while at the same time run a global crusade against swindle and hypocricy, which means blaming others for swindle. "If it is british, then it is swindle, and consequently if it is swindle, then it is british" - and thereby they can have dreamt of attaining authority and authorship to other people's intellectual property by way of their own historic swindle. An attack on Gaza along such lines could be thinkable.

And then it would be about that manuscript which also could have been seen as a key to 11/9-2001 in USA, leaving the signatures of Bush and Clinton on the attack.

I anyhow feel a little exhausted and tired after my discovery. I have also made several and repeated attempts to get hold of the piece of information whether I should deliver tax return to Athens or not. The tax office in Kupseli does not answer and nobody else does either - about the criteria for such when I had spent a total of LESS THAN 144 days in Greece in 2008. My official moveout from Austria to Greece was on 3 April and if they had had a residential address register I would have been there in the morning 20 June and said that I was moving out of the country. In fact it was felt as a little vital for me to tell clearly that I would be out of the country within June - in order not to fall victim of the book I felt that I had pressed onto the library in the jewish museum. That would have taken it to two and a half month, but they don't have a residential address register in Greece and by counting days on greek soil etc there are various ways to count. I need to have it confirmed that I shall not deliver tax return there if I do to Italy. But since one of the reasons why I moved out of the flat in Paxon street was that it seemed to have been the theme of the US film 'American Beauty' which had a not so happy ending, it could have been planned long ago that I would have to interface with the tax office in Kupseli (with that very significant address) and of course there could have been agents employed there years in advance of my arrival if the film had been made on basis of this address, in particular if the film was a quasi-plagiarism of the first book 'Hammerfest' in my 16-book work The Endmorgan Quartet, the last book in which was the one I gave to the jewish library. I hope that is not the reason why I get no answer from the tax office. It could, though, be the same sort of problem.

I sent my book "I tell you, Estunates" to legal deposit in England but there has been NO ANSWER. Normally there is a receipt.

Modern Language Review

The 'dritte Reich' probably is about the 'britte Reich', the 'people of britain'. For example, 'The modern language review' (published four times annually) is a good example of the aspirations which have been assigned to the alleged zionist involvements in the planning of the holocaust. I once passed an old german in Berlin who said 'Jude!' when I passed him. It is not likely that England can get around this problem in peaceful ways. When Blair took over in Labour, it was after the sudden death of John Smith - as if that should have been a solution to their problems. It has probably gone all too far for any such solutions, which also could be the reason why 11 September 2001 did not lead to anything, and one may wonder if the attitudes of modern England - which in poetry like Keats or [...] and poets generally before 1550 is totally absent - is a part of such aspirations as to become 'the new Jews'. This "Modern language review" seems to be a very typical example of modern british scholarship in the humanities: "Henrik Ibsen and Andre Gide never met in real life nor did they exchange any correspondence. However, so influential were the ideas manifest in the former's plays that a generation of French writers responded to them and often incorporated them into their aesthetic. In several ways, Gide's discovery of Ibsen in the early 1890's sheds a particularly interesting light on the impact which the Norwegian playwright exercised on this segment of French intellectual society" (Pollard, Modern language review, Jan.2008: 46). Is this the story of the little infant beast of Christmas 1957 who so brutally raped the 'shid' of Adolf Hitler as a 'national guru' of britten? One wonders if 'The modern language review' is this style and nothing else than this. It is published in England. There is no purpose in discussing with them: This is about Gide and not shit or cannabis. Forget the discussion. Could be that is what Blair's takeover meant: It doesn't help at all. Nor is this anything new. I leafed in some issues from the early eighties and picked out 1983 to see if there was any mention of the hypothetical 1982 laser beam 'third eye' in connection with my circumcision under GAS narcosis: There was an article about "The Judaism of Rodrigues Lobo" in April 1983, which could be that laser story hidden behind the story of the TV licence (also in 1985-86). Was there a 'third eye' mutilation of my prefrontal cortex by laser beam for the purpose of mutilating my ability to read because I had started studying literature? 'It doesn't matter unless you switch it on', could be the theme of the TV and the licence. I can read but it is true that it tends to 'butte imot' after some pages ('bena sir butto' = 'han/ho butta stega'?) for whatever reason. But that could perhaps even be a psychological phenomenon - the first word I learnt to read from Gröver/'Mengele' was 'pancake', accompanied with his laughter. The full front page contents of that issue April 1983 is worth mention:

1. 'Sir Gawain and the green knight' and the Vulgate 'Lancelot'. By Marjory Rigby
2. Gawain's defence of Lancelot in Malory's 'Death of Arthur'. By C. David Benson
3. Sense and sensibility: The child and the man in 'The rape of the lock'. By Charles Martindale
4. Rhetoric and Psychology in Thomas' 'Tristan'. By Roger Pensom
5. Women on top: Antifeminism in the Fablieux? By Lesley Johnson
6. Camus and the aphorism: 'L'exile et le royaume'. By Rosemarie Jones
7. Pero Vermúez and the politics of the cid's exile. By Dian Fox
8. The judaism of Francisco Rodrigues Lobo. By Selma Pousao-Smith
9. Occasional poetry in the eighteenth century in Germany. By Joseph Leighton
10. Alpine adventures: Some thoughts on Max Frisch's 'Antwort aus der Stille'. By Mary E.Stewart
11. Beneath a closed visor: Dimitry Panin and the two faces of Solgodin in Solzhenitsyn's 'The first circle'. By Richard Hallett

'Pannen and sol-she-nytt-syn' = 'the forehead and sun-spoon-new-vision' - beneath a closed visor. The list of titles seems to refer to a making of a 'third eye' by laser beam (rather than oldfashioned 'lance'). Women on top etc. The case against Arne Treholt (codename 'Foxtrot') started on 17 May 1983 with ransacking of his home. See discussion below for a possible reference to a future Ehamgasse in Vienna. There are some traces of the Visthouse camera in Ehamgasse on Hörbiger in the MLR 2007 issues. The camera spied - as one had to believe - on the housedoor where people turned the key around in the keyhole. For example, April 2007 has the following titles on the front page:

1) The secret life of the Della Cruscan sonnet: William Gifford's Baviad and Maeviad. By Marianne van Remoortel
2) Carlyle through Nietzsche: Reading Sartor Resartus. By Jeremy Tambling
3) 'Laughing at the laugh': Unhappy consciousness in Nathanael West's The dream life of Balso Snell. By Doug Haynes
4) Synonymity and semantic variability in medieval french and middle english. By W.Rothwell
5) Unpicking female exemplarity; or, the usefulness of body stories: Reassessing female communal identity in two early modern french texts. By Cathy Hampton
6) Ariosto the Traveller. By Ita Mac Carthy
7) Paradigms of peripheral modernity in Lorca and Yeats. By Stephen Hart
8) In the bard's shadow: Shakespearean affinities as an obstacle to the reception of Schiller's plays in Britain 1945-2005. by Bettina Göbels
9) 'Bloß aus Lemberg gebürtig': Detlev Spinell, the austrian jewish aesthete in Thomas Mann's Tristan. By Andrew Barker
10) Russian Orthodoxy: A User's Manual. Church advice literature as a reflection of present-day reality. By Bettina S.Weichert

Do you believe that there is another and purely literary or scholarly reason for the article on Lorca and Yeats than the keyturning in Locka and Yale's or even guests? There is no purpose in discussing such things. There was an opening to an underearth garage to the right of the house entrance on which the camera was probably just spying. One gets this nervous associations that there could have been 'eucharists' dropped in a hole in the basement and this should have been inspiring for the (monkey business) ideas in the 'third eye', wherein ideas are entering like a key turning in the lock. There is still some way to go before we reach enlightenment.

This is what modern british scholarship looks like. And here indeed it looks like the camera attention to the housedoor where I was living in 2007. It lends some suppot to the idea that the Hörbiger camera on Ehamgasse could have been assigned the role of Visthouse for a new persecution program for the 21st century. I don't know if "Continuity and Discontinuity in Karl Kraus's satire" in the July 2007 issue would be about the death of Kurt Köck (Church?) in late 2007 after some months of cancer (and tiredness, of course). This was the issue of July 2007? Could it in fact have been a british responsibility claim on his death? The kitchen tap? It is my impression that this is what modern british scholarship in the humanities is about nowadays. But my goodness, say the britons, 'Karl Kraus' is not the same as 'Kurt Köck'? Just forget the discussion.

One predicts that if the assassination of Benazir Bhutto had anything to do with this Ehamgasse Hörbiger Visthouse camera, it should be there on the front page of this british magazine. Indeed it seems to be on the front page of october 2007:

1) Chaucer's Wife of Bath and Fowles's Quaker Maid.
2) Machiavelli at the Court of James VI.
3) Vernon Lee's 'A Wicked Voice'.
4) Bernardin de Saint-Pierre and Girodet.
5) Notions of Evil in Baudelaire.
6) Messy Ethics in Camus's La Peste.
7) Sciascia and the Majorana Case.
8) Laura Restrepo's La novia oscura.
9) Ana Clavel's Los deseos y su sombra.
10) Hauptmann's Kollege Crampton and Michael Kramer.
11) Rilke's 'left-handed lyre'.
12) 'Pastoral Space' in Nineteenth-Century Russian Prose.

I wrote on the website under the article 'Visthouse' the following: "I notice that the phonological feature-conversion of 'Hoerbiger' takes it to something close to 'Troypaka'. Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan was apparently assassinated in Christmas 2007. If she, as reasoned from this assassination, should have represented something like 'pak-troika', one can notice that her name in Norwegian ('bena sir butto') means something like 'the legs say butto[k]'. If this is the other side of 'Hoerbiger', one can speculate that 'Hoerbiger' = 'hear bigger' could mean something like 'the feet say [...]', for example the feet can say 'klatschen'. There is the apparent tradition of considering Adolf Hitler an 'Ø-streicher' in the sense of 'Fleisch-klatschen'". For example, there is an article on 'Sciascia and the Majorana Case', which could be the 'klatschen' of the 'gide-case', the 'feet'. There are other interpretations of the name, such as 'the bones say in the hut', etc. One notices also the 'perestroika' flavour of a 'paktroika' concept.

If 'Troypaka' is the feature-converted form of 'Hörbiger' where the camera was, one notices the obvious 'Iliad' and Troyan war reference in the 'package'. I refer to Iliad song I line 84 which can be translated "Akhilleus answered the answering footsoles", as if the quick-running Akhilleus were a sort of 'ad-old feetler' from Simmering, a piece of foot-klatschen of the type signified with the formula 'benazir bhutto'. Which means that the assassination could have been about installing this concept into the Ehamgasse package of concepts - including the turning of the keys of A-key-lefs - for a british engineering of a new Ad-old Feetler from Austria, Vienna, Simmering. Then if the project is british, a british assassination of Bhutto could have had its responsibility claim in e.g. this Modern Language Review for october 2007. "Fowles' Quaker Maid" and so forth.

It was not only I who could not take it any longer in early 2008 after the death of Köck in late 2007. Another three of the neighbours moved away along with me.

Do you think it is only the titles on the front page which have this quality? Only the editor 'knows about it'? It seems to be the whole article, at least sometimes, and could be it is in these british publications particularly. The article on Gide and Ibsen mentioned above continues: "...French intellectual society. At the outset of his literary career Gide, like many of his contemporaries in France and England, was drawn towards the world of northern Europe. He read a number of the works of Ibsen, Strindberg and Björnson which were available in French translation. 'Les litteratures du Nord sont effrayantes', he wrote to his mother on 22 September 1894". One could guess that even the author of the article is well informed about the crumbs of 'gide' at the outskirts of my puberty behind, the brink around the anus which harboured occasional hardwalked remains which could be lifted over to the bedside sheet-edge - like a letter for his custody mother to read. Indeed, the british Rover car factory was closed down closer to the millenium shift. This seems to be the world of british scholarship in the humanities. 'Röver was close down', studying the scriptures of the textiles. It is not only the title on the front page: It is the entire article packed with such language and 'aura of associations'. Just forget it, is the theme. Who would waste their time and life with exterminating britons? People have better things to do than that.

When comes the book about the Oxford movement [source Ihlebaek]? New Christian conceptualizations? Why did the anglicans break with the rest of Europe?

We must hope the story does not end in a wave of antis-britism.

Nazism seems to be pederasty, cannibalism and genocide.

'Das dritte Reich' could be for example to hand over some information of more or less private character about me to serve as the theme of a magazine or an article. Could be it is not even 'for example', such as New Labour's five election pledges could indicate.

The recent issue October 2008 of this magazine contains an article by a John C.Hirsch on an alleged middle english poem called 'Judas'. I suppose the poem exists, although I would not believe anything about its authenticity. If it is a piece of swindle it could of course have been 'diagonally' replaced with an intellectual professing the importance of truth. Such diagonal replacement could be for the strategy of 'moral uprightness'. Could it have been about Jörg Haider who died in a car accident in the night to 11 October 2008 - after the british defence ministry a day or two before had reported that they had 'lost control with a hard drive'? Bhutto in 2007, Haider in 2008? One per issue? There are four issues per year. The article tells that the manuscript to the 'Judas' poem (a #17, not in Ehamgasse, I suppose) existed - in one single handwritten copy only - in Trinity College Library, but disappeared between 1863 and 1896 with a little 'fellow' who moved away. There seems to exist a transcript by a Sir Frederick Madden from 1843, the year when John Grover wrote his pamphlet. There is also another John Grover 1823 in British Library, same size, same length, self-published in Brighton, the telegraph house, in the valley - although electricity hardly was invented at that time and telegraphy must have been semaphoric and then it was not in the valley. Could be the dating is doubtful, then, and hence one could speculate that John Grover 1843 really is from after the publication of Grassmann 1844. Hirsch makes mention of the observation that the poem seems to be about Judas being in bed with his sister (the poem is from middle english times and then the question whether electricity was invented is not relevant). He makes a reference to an article by Peter Dronke (not P-dirt ronke, nor 'Arthur Omre'): "Peter Dronke has ably defended the text we now have, arguing that it is 'one if the most 'modern' of medieval poems: with its swiftly changing tableaux, its tense, explosive use of dialogue, its sharp moments of tension and climax, one could well call it the first masterpiece of expressionism" (Hirsch, MLR 103: 931-39). This seems to be what the brittens believe in. Is it 'Rögtön' who 'Vökjö'? 'Jövök' means 'I come' and can apply also to ejaculation by masturbation ('ronke') and not only by sexual intercourse. 'Dass' is norwegian for 'toilet [bowl]', formerly the outdoor 'loo'. There is an urgent need for a serious study of the history and character of the war against the intellectuals, and certainly there is a need for analyzing and listing the sort of publication which this is an example of. It is fully legitimate to observe and discuss the presence of rich associations to toilets, masturbation, excrements and all sorts of existing substances in modern british scholarship and elsewhere. Since the 1850's, technology has advanced rapidly and the humanities deteriorated accordingly. That is alarming indeed. Nowadays they send people to the moon. But a magazine like this 'Modern language review' should not be classified under serious scholarship if its more or less main purpose is the harassment persecution of a few individuals - which England could take as its reference for role-turning. A national british strategy via 'swindle' should in fact be stopped by the international community. If Hirsch' article is a more or less a direct participation in a harassment campaign against individuals, it is not the thing which a university should accept from an employee. There was a case of a professor in Bergen in Norway who had touched some female students during some educational instruction and he was fired from his job due to the alleged sexual harassment. This could even have been the background of another article in the same 'Modern language review', as it is called: "Family comes first: I-identity and we-identity in Pierre Bergounioux", by Jean H.Duffy. One could even think of this as a 'turn-around' strategy. The article starts: "Like the work of two of his literary heroes - William Faulkner and Claude Simon - Pierre Bergounioux's autofictional texts return repeatedly to the same characters, locations, and situations". But this 'auto-fiction' clearly is not about Bergen at all, it is about Bergounioux and just forget the discussion. It doesn't help at all. Russia expelled one British Council office some time ago. Could be there were reasons for it.

I am not 'stuffed'. Nor am I a Judas. If somebody is stuffed of judasing, it is not me.

I don't know if that is what modern journals and magazines of british and other scholarship is about - diagonal replacement of intellectuals and politicians with corresponding articles. I have not enough knowledge of the field to determine if the article about the Judas poem could have been about Haider after the registration in the residential address register, but it is my general impression that science and scholarship isn't what it used to be. Is it likely that science and scholarship 'changes their minds'? That could be precisely the 'challenge'. There is also an appendix with roman pagination about "Venice's european diaspora: The case of John Leoni (1685-1746)" by a 'John Woodhouse'.

In short, it is theoretically fully possible that Haider was assassinated and Israel bombed Gaza in an attempt from England or New Labour to hijack my poetry book "I tell you, Estunates" as part of my TEQ. But if that were the case, then Israel is rather far from the policy they claim to be on. Then it would look more like a representative of the 'britte Reich'.

Haider could even have been tentatively attached to Ehamgasse or the 'virtual variant' of it when my address registration in Venice was accepted on 10 October. I recently got the annual pensions overview which showed that I had got 191.684 NOK in 2008, and I think the monthly payment was adjusted around the mid of the year. The sum for June was 15443 but I think there was some afterpayment in July for a couple of months, which means that it likely went up to (probably to 16239 per months) in perhaps May or April. The monthly rent in Ehamgasse was 338,93 euro in the first half of 2008 - I paid untill June. I left the place around a week into April. The sum of 191684 NOK is 23960 euros if 1 euro = 8 NOK, as it was since I got the pension in 2002. But in the course of 2008 it sank to somewhere between 9 and 10 NOK. It seems that the Ehamgasse houserent of 338,93 euros would have been my factual loss if the value fell from about 8,0 to 9,64 NOK per euro. It has been around there in parts of 2008. When USA finally had to rescue the financial institutions in crisis - and many of them had names resembling aspects of my life and work, such as Morgan Stanley etc - with a massive bailout of 800 billion dollars, one could fancy that this was the enormous sum of money which I could have deserved in economic compensation after all the US monkey business throughout the decades. And now they were given to my 'virtual being' in terms of those US financial companies in economic crisis (and even I really was a little low in resources in the autumn 2008) which indexed aspects of my life and work. So things should have been restored and everything be fine after the bailout. That is the 'virtual' part of it. And it could even be that USA or UK and allieds have planned a gradual 'discharge' of this being from my own personal being - symbolizing the gradual hijacking of the jewish-genetic diaspora's culture which has been the program since 1850. But of course the US authorities probably did not have much choice in 2008 and the bailout was the only rescue. However, it may be that a part of the effect of it was a general rise in euros relative to other currencies, including NOK. This 'virtual being' could be a part of the program on Ehamgasse, including the virtual being (Abr-Eham?) in the camera and the general program of 'surveillance of masturbation' in the private home - and then one must believe that 'masturbation' is another term for what is called 'swindle' in british english - quite simply 'intellectualism' - and their program could be to hunt down freethinkers and rebels who do not conform to the authority of the crown.

The story suggests why it must be considered a ridiculous idea for me to submit a manuscript to a british publisher. I suppose Modern Language Review is reasonably representative of british publishing.

My guess is that the plan is to make an Abr-Eham who is identical with Gröver/'Mengele' and that the identity simply means Dr.Verboten - the ruler of the minds of people. This 'Abr-Eham' would then be the program of international secret service (who also could have arranged the attack on 11 September 2001 with a 'verboten' symbolism). It could have been this Abr-Eham who injected his chemicals in my body in 1959 and thereby contributed to the formation of my psyche and physical constitution, in addition to the 'cosmic' effects of the calendarial telescopes of Rilke and the genetics = microcosmic effect on my constitution from Celan. These seem to be the three accents referred to by Celan in his Der Meridian: Gravis (cp. 'GRAV'-is way), Circumflex and Acute. The nazi program would be to lend priority to the 'political' factor which means Verboten with conventional custody relation beyond the genetic constitution. And that is when 'Abr-Eham' would be considered the eldest patriarch in their construction.

It was probably while I lived at Rekustad in Fredrikstad, which was around 1977-78, that somebody had opened the kitchen tap when I was away - I don't think it was me who had done it while I was in there and the water was frozen - and I returned to a kitchen floor full of frozen water. It is the fact that this story seems to be found in the undertext of the Eisenhower doctrine #3 which tells me that it probably cannot have been me who opened the tap, and it was easy to sneak in through an unsecured window. It is from about the same times that I remember a person from cafe 'Krabba' and 'Björnen' whom I was acquainted with only very marginally (could be we exchanged a few words on some occasion, could be not) and whom I thought I recognized in the politician Johannes Hahn when I came to Vienna. He is similar but of course I don't know if it is the same man. Neither do I remember the name of the one from Fredrikstad, so I cannot tell if it is the same. Hahn battled 'Krebs' in his youth, according to his website. Now his name points not only to this notorious kitchen tap but also to the circumstances around the death of Gröver/'Mengele' in 1990 - in the mirror point around the death of the Shah to his daughter the persian princess Leila. 'Jo han e Shahn' = 'yes, he is the shah', while 'jo han e tsaren' = 'yes he is the tsar', as could have been the conclusion of the german emperor in 1904 (cp. the other name in Ehamgasse). Which then suggests 'jo han et saren', which means 'yes he eats the Sar', but with masculine ending in the Sar = Saren instead of the conventional Sara which is feminine - and the wife of 'Abr-Eham'. But this rewrite formula would also rewrite 'Gordon Brown on TV' = 'Gordon Brown på TV' = 'Gordon Promp åt Eve' = 'Gordon Fart ate Eve', as a correlate to the eating metaphor in Hahn's own name. (Cp. also the murder of 'Pim Forteyn' some years ago when he was coming out from a TV studio, I think it was). Now if the austrians are afraid of being victims of a british verboten black sea loop, this unwilled ridiculing of Brown as british PM could happen to be popular among the voters in Austria, in particular if 'hard on fraud' (cp. 'hardon fraud') is the key to the loop and its principle of motion. (Gröver/'Mengele' told me - could be it was in the seventies - about a 'village fool' in his childhood who had a clock and who always said 'ti po to' = 'ten to two' when people asked him what time it was. Once he asked Gröver/'Mengele': "Harry sett den nye brambilen du?" "Nei". "Virrusean?" "Vel..." (= 'Have you seen the new fire engine?' 'No'. 'Wannaseeit?' 'Well...') And then he pressed the alarm button). The story could, though, be obtained relative to me with the role of mine as Dr.Verboten from 1968 and the 11th birthday - and hence even in 1959 the other way round. But this means that Hahn's career - if these matters are of any importance - could relate to not only me but also to the presence of Brown in Downing Street - and even if his policy may be the opposite of Verboten, his role could be resting on such Verboten-indexical factors. To this comes the famous paragraph in the Staatsvertrag from 1955 which tells that the austrians are obliged to 'liquidate the leftovers after nazism' if they want to remain independent. In practical politics, this probably means that if the austrian authorities do not follow the 'allied' or simply british interests, they are quite simply liquidated under the label of 'nazismus'. When I moved to Vienna in 2004, president Klestil fell into a coma the day when I registered my address and died the next day, and when I registered my address in Venice in 2008 after having moved out of Austria, Jörg Haider (who was a sort of winner of the election to parliament a few days earlier - a sort of 'virtual president' or 'virtual PM') died in the following night. Although Haider was very popular in Austria, he used to keep a low profile and preferred to stay in his home Klagenfurt rather than ruling in Vienna, for whatever reason. But this means probably only that austrian politics is not very independent - and not much is needed to get it down by such 'Staatsvertrag' means. This could be precisely the factor which makes it possible for Hahn to make a career of this indexical type - including such innocent word-games which, if interpreted far enough, could be taken to mean that the britons are nazis - since it sort of 'gives in' to british pressure while at the same time the britons would feel fine about the presence of such 'verboten' indexation which eventually could come to make the 'loop' run if it starts.

In fact there are traces of a symbolism in Modern Language Review for April 2005, which was around the time when I last saw the neighbour with the child (I may have seen the child later, though) in Ehamgasse: "The perversion of fairy tale: Primo Levi's 'La bella addormentata nel frigo'" (by Lucie Benchouiha) followed by "Jose Saramago: 'O Evangelho segundo Jesus Christo: Outlines of a Newer Testament'" (by David G.Frier) could perhaps be telling of a certain associative potential in the names of e.g. Hahn and Brown. The article in Modern Language Review for April 2005 is called "No time for the doves? Intrusion and redrafting in the English translation of 'La placa del Diamant'" (by Dominic Keown). One notices how the phrase 'anti-redrafts' to something close to 'eham-placa'.

Modern Language Review is a british journal.

There must exist rules for when a person who has been in both Greece and Italy shall deliver tax return to one of them and when he shall not. I would much like to have a copy of one such page - so I can see for myself what are the criteria and do not have to face a 50% taxation due to postal failure - which is nothing compared with 11/9-2001, Oklahoma bombing, Gaza bombing and hypothetical Haider assassination and much else - but believe that it can be difficult. I hope the plan is not to 'knekk Eham mökk o nomisk' = 'bray kim mech o' nomically' = 'break him economically'.

Conclusion: Due to the theft of my manuscript and such things as the article in The Times there is a rather clear signature from the two US presidents Clinton and Bush on the attack on 11 September 2001. Which of course does not have to mean that these presidents were behind the attack - but it could mean that my manuscript was used for the purpose of leaving that impression. Could it be that it was the 'virtual being' who was behind the attack? Abr-Eham? In fact there was an election to the norwegian parliament in the evening 10 September 2001 - the votes were still counted when the twin towers fell. This parliament is called 'Storting' since about 1814 - and one may be allowed to wonder if the reason for that name is the 'Stonehenge' in England. "United and loyal untill Dovre/Dover falls", something like that. The union with Sweden 1814-1905 could even have been for the reasons of just that unity. The attack on 11 September was therefore clearly correlated with a reference to England in terms of that parliament election to the Storting. It could be about that 1-2-3 ladder for the construction of the 'britte Reich'.

Finally: It must be noticed that if the attack on Gaza should have been for the british purpose of hijacking my authorship, it would have been on basis of secret surveillance of my computer - which only means that they would quite simply steal the material out of my computer, the food out of my mouth, like a 'Romanov' lifting of the manuscript in 1999 - and then one can easily conjecture that they would apply weird law for telling themselves that I have no authority to the authorship - and therefore they would feel entitled to spread the material around to research networks, authors, business, politics, advertisment, british-journals etc. That could even have been included in the 11 September 2001 attack on USA. Then if I come around with my things, they would say that this is second or third or fourth place - there have been lots of these presented before you - and they come up with a medical diagnosis from the turn of the millenium on paranoid schizophrenia which is due to a laser-produced third eye - from which the medical authorities could be invoked for claiming that "this person is totally unable to have written anything like this". But all this would of course be nothing but thieves who have arranged this theft from a private person. There cannot be any sort of legitimacy for it. Could be there already exist laws in many countries which allow institutions - such as research and arts councils - access to surveillance data, or the secret services feel entitled to forward the ideas lifted from secret surveillance, and make these ideas available to public institutions and networks. I once spoke with a person in the norwegian research council and pointed out the danger that they could steal ideas from an application, to which he answered that ideas are not copyrighted and they are entitled to take an idea from one application and present it to other potential applicants who make their own applications on basis of them - and of course they are free to support the application they want. Which means that secret surveillance of this type is equivalent with organized public theft of intellectual property, in particular when it is forwarded to persons or institutions outside the surveillance unit. If Israel were used for such purposes in their attack on Gaza, there can be no doubt that such a hijacking would have to be the plan. And then the path is short to conclude that the plan could be to arrange for british swindle.

Where are the intellectuals who could protest against all this development? Are the only intellectuals left those who receive their ideas from the secret services and write out a manuscript on basis of them? The war against the intellectuals has been tough and the plan is probably to replace the intellectuals with puppets from the international secret service. And then the 'scholarly journals' will look like this british example.

As far as I know, the Schengen agreement allows for extensive access, in the sense that any member country can secretly survey me in any other member country. Probably the level of integrity in administration is not mature for such possibilities, and there should exist a law which says that if administration can survey private persons, then private persons have the right to be informed about the surveillance. For example, there should be a law which tells that if data have been lifted from an outdoor surveillance camera, it must be possible for the public to check out if the information in the camera has been accessed or not, and if it has, who accessed it. And if there is surveillance of a private person, the services should have the obligation to inform the person about it. I cannot work on my computer if the only result is that my work is stolen.

It is, though, likely that since England is not a member of the Schengen area, the plan is to use this agreement and membership therein as a national consent to inclusion in the area which could be targeted by verboten methods as a political strategy. Which could mean that the strategy is in terms of 'british hypocricy'.

'Enkens skjerv' ('the widow's offering') vs. 'skjenkens ærv'. A 'skjenk' is a 'sideboard': The rich mother dies (the father died decades ago) but leaves only a humble sideboard (skjenken) for you. Arv = inheritance. We must hope that the allusion is not to a humble 'cyanide': Das dritte vs. britte Reich. There is an article in 'Modern language review' january 2008 on 'collective suicide: updating of Cervantes [etc]' as well as 'mothers and nomadic subjects' (cp. nomadic / cidemon = sideboard). The updated will left after the mother only means that a good portion of the inheritance (of the intellectual property) is planned to go to the state of England.

England seems to have some influence in Austria due to the Staatsvertrag. My guess is that they wedged the same into Germany and Italy by way of Baader-Meinhof and Brigate Rosse. For example, it would not have been the policy of Aldo Moro but his name meaning the age of Sachs when a biopsy could have been taken from her and the idea that she would have been my great grandmother (olde-mora) married to Abr-Eham (Gröver/'Mengele'). And then my mother could have been e.g. Laila on the mounds between my home and Apenes who was murdered three days before Moro (Apenes was). That is for british interests and has nothing to do with any sort of leftwing policy.

A schoolchild was shot outside the entrance to a school in Norway some time ago, as told a news headline (I did not read the article), and now what could have been a sort of 'responsibility claim' to that shooting (if it is not coincidentally something else) seems to have been sprayed on a neighbouring wall. It seems possibly to have been in the night after I put out on the internet the first part of the above on 14 February 2009.

Have you ever stood with one of those scholarly journals of that type (one sees it immediately from the jargon) in the hand and offered it a thought what sort of world this is? It is likely that it is those longhaired young folks in the park who are right when they give up the career simply because they believe that they cannot understand this sort of thing. One really shouldn't either. It is, from the data I have discussed here, a possible conclusion that the real activity of the socalled 'scholarly' journal could be to present an indexation of an intellectual or person otherwise of integrity relative to the concept of truth in advance of the murder of the person who thereby is 'diagonally replaced' with a set or subset of persons of comparably low moral integrity to the extent that they write articles on topics related to an indexation of the circumstances of the murder. In this way, the british program could be a gradual takeover of the recognition of 'moral integrity' and after some decades of this there are not many intellectuals left elsewhere and England presents itself as the only morally upright society - and can launch its crusade against swindle and hypocricy - after all that 'diagonal replacement'. I don't know if this really is the hardboiled profile of the magazine, but the few cases I have discussed and tested against the data in the magazine do in fact support such a hypothesis, although I have of course studied only some selected samples. But of course it is futile to make any claims - the article in Gide and Ibsen seems to be an exercise in associations around 'smearing of substance', as if scholarly brains nowadays should be recognized as the 'abdominal brain' - the theory served as a serious hypothesis (one would expect it to be british, but I don't know who made it) that there is more nerve tissue around the colon than in the ordinary brain in the skull - or do they quite simply mean in the colon? Neither is there any need for discussing the assumption of collaboration of the editor(s) and writers in the planning and profiling of murders - of course this is a typical british scholarly magazine - it is even published in Cambridge by the Modern Humanities Research Association which was founded "in 1918 and has become an international organization with members in all parts of the world". I don't know if that is supposed to mean that they are in contact with 'international secret service'.

Here is an exaggerated account of modern scholar education which hopefully is not entirely correct: The education of modern academic scholars in the humanities is typically via a doctorate education program which consists in a course in scientific method (not so advanced, typically on the form 1. collect data, 2. read it, 3. make a conclusion) and talks with the supervisor who tests the student for loyalties to the new system and jargon. If the student is willing to accept the jargon, then 50 pages of written talk about a theme can be accepted as PhD dissertation by the supervisor and then it is accepted by the committee. (My PhD dissertation was not accepted because it was not in the jargon - and maybe it would have been rejected in any case due to such things as this Ehamgasse and all the other politics). Then one must read a little but it is about learning this sort of scolarly journal style which means being able to understand what the article 'really says'. The mythology, that could mean. Mythology for government, it could be. Then one is integrated into scholarly networks and it can take some two to five years or something like that to reach professor status. A lifetime in nonsense is completely possible in that business. It is fully possible that the main competence required by the average scholar today is the willingness to accept the conditions for participation in the 'great project', which means the world of postwar nazism. I suppose that means that the editor of a journal can contact a scholar with suitable name and interests (these are normally listed for example on their internet page and of course there exist directories of names and fields) and ask for an article on a certain topic. I don't know how much swindle there is in such an article, but one could guess that there could be some of it. Some scholars are perhaps more hardboiled and welleducated on swindle than others.

The conclusion on that magazine is likely to be that it participates in the construction of Ehamgasse for the Abr-Eham mythology as a part of a british project. One can therefore also make the assumption that president Klestil was murdered by british secret service when I came to register my address in Vienna in 2004 - in extension from the car number studies and 11 September 2001 - in order to secure collaboration on the Ehamgasse project on basis of the address registration phenomenon. Haider could have been for the same purposes. One guesses that the plan could be to construct a 'virtual being' (Abr-Eham etc) who is supposed to have the status of a mythological or quasi-divine being as the subject of a new religion for the masses (the 'mob'), possibly including weird quasi-christian elements (after I had signed the contract for the flat right before Christmas 2004, a feeling of intense nausea and disgust developed during Christmas along with this idea that a 'person princess' had been thrown in a rathole and only Gröver/'Mengele's dead body was dumped down to her to eat from - untill the Banda Aceh earthquake released the accumulated 'tension' - although I had of course no reason for this idea at all - perhaps it was my interpretation of the TV programs for the Christmas - I did see a fragment of a film that Christmas which seemed to contain remnants of the idea and I concluded that such media could have been the source of the idea, although the brief TV watch was after the bad feeling after the contract-signing, but of course such programs reside in the cultural space), while the nazis are supposed to rule the masses from above by knowledge of the secret details in this construction. That is probably the aim of the 'nazi revolution' which started around 1850. There is every good reason to stop it as soon as possible - if it is that political project which it seems to be. The international community should of course stop that Ehamgasse project. It could be very important. I think all details in the project - participants, plans etc - should be published so that the public can get the chance to understand what it was and what it was planned to be. Visthouse seems to have been the basis for WWI, the Klipra connection, Verdun, Auschwitz and much else. We don't need a repeat of that tragic story.

I add that the logo to 'ÖVW', the housing company who owns Ehamgasse 23, resembles (or resembled, if it changed) the traditional VW logo, but with two dots above - like hands holding the steering wheel of the T-262 (or even the green one which he bought in the early seventies - and which he said was 'a monday car'). (Could be even this could have been part of my ideas after the signing of the contract).

It is amazing to read that Modern Language Review, the issues immediately preceding major acts of terror. Look at that 'Leif Stene Johansen' in the Kennedy assassination of the October 1963 issue, for example, even in Marmorveien on Falchaasen in Fredrikstad, not to speak of Hitler's Beer Hall Putsch in the October 1923 issue - a british putsch indeed, this issue tells! Here are the articles for April 1981, some days before the attempt on the pope in Rome:

1. George Eliot and Positivism: A reassessment. By T.R.Wright.
2. Yeat's second 'vision': Berkeley, Coleridge, and the correspondence with Sturge Moore. 3. By Grosvenor E.Powell
4. Berryman's last poems: Plain style and Christian style. By Roger Pooley
5. The comic role of the 'Raisonneur' in Molière's theatre. By N.A.Peacock
6. The source and development of the idea of the renaissance in early nineteenth-century french criticism. By Barrie Bullen
7. Colour symbolism in 'Le rouge et le noir'. By Patrick Pollard
8. The 'carpe diem' sonnets of Garcilaso de la Vega and Gongora. By R.P.Calcraft
9. Characterization and dialogue in Cervantes's 'Comedias en prosa'. By Anthony Close
10. Why read Kafka? By Martin Swales
11. History and political literature: The interpretation of the 'day of german unity' in the literature of east and west. By Peter Hutchinson
12. Peter Weiss's 'Marat/Sade': A portrait of the artist in bourgeois society. By Ladislaus Löb
13. Heirs of eternity: An essay on the poetry of Keats and Mandel'shtam. By Leon Burnett.

This list of articles seems to tell that the gunman shot at the pope's genitals and that could have been the entire purpose with it - to wound the 'papa' - with a british responsibility claim in advance telling that even the Vatican knows that the terror is published in advance in this magazine but they do not tell it to the public. Therefore he was put in a dialysis machine for a while.

Why read Kafka = Karol Wojtyla
George Eliot and Positivism - problems with urinating afterwards
Coleridge and correspondence with the 'Sturge' - correspondence with the surgeon afterwards for getting the material from the fridge?
Berryman and Roger 'Puly' - british moralism of 'anglican' type, cp. the fridge
Marat in the bath
Keats and Mandel'shtam = kitchen tap from 'Rekustad'
The 'day of german unity' in the literature of east and west = could even be the very reason for the whole story - the 'german-language urination' in the literature of the iron curtain region
de la Vega and Gongora. By R.P.Calcraft - could be telling of just this Vienna hypothesis

The October 1939 issue contained these articles:

1. Chaucer's shipman in real life, by Margaret Galway
2. Notes upon the text and the interpretation of 'Beowulf', by W.S.Mackie
3. Wilkie Collins and 'A tale of two cities', by Henry J.W.Milley
4. The origin of Scott's 'Nigel', by W.M.Parker

These seem to be about the sinking of the Royal Oak in the Scapa Flow on the Orkneys, followed shortly thereafter with the deliverance of the Oslo Report to the british naval attachee. This navel is seemingly the same as in Hitler's beer hall putsch and the 'fatal curiosity' in the Feldherrnhalle: It is the same putsch.

But it is likely that this October 1939 is only an over-obvious reference to serve as the background of October 1938. Here is the list of titles from October 1938, which was ONE YEAR BEFORE the sinking of the Royal Oak in 1939. This corresponds to the one hour time lag between Vilnius and London in 2001: On 8 June, the day after the general election, there was a car accident outside my home in Vilnius in the evening, and 2 of the 3 young people in the car which had been pressed off the street died. ONE HOUR precisely later, which was the time lag and hence the local time was the same, Tony Blair announced the name of the new foreign minister which was Jack Straw. This was at the end of a calendarial telescope with foot-and-mouth, Nepali 'royal oak' massacre (see April 2001 issue for what looks like a detailed account in advance), UK general election, this ONE HOUR time lag and perhaps even with a one minute's delay with microphone-fumbling on stage and a one second of pronounciation of Straw's name. But that only means that it could be about this ONE YEAR lag to 1938 - for the east-wards literary orientation. October 1939 was some days before the sinking (not knirking) of the british Royal Oak which lay in the Scapa Flow on the Orkneys. The sinking seems to have served as a british responsibility claim on the holocaust. It was a mystery how the 'germans' had managed to get two torpedos into the flow without being discovered. The answer to the mystery could be that the explosives quite simply had been put out there in advance - cp. the comparable role of 'Modern Language Review' which puts out articles and various forms of manuscripts. Here are the titles for the articles in that 'October 1938':

1. The Hull Noah Play, by Anna J. Mill
2. Sir Philip Sidney and the matchmakers, by Denver Ewing Baughan
3. The murder of Nicholas Turberville. Two Elizabethan ballads. Norma H.Hodgson
4. Is Manon Lescaut a Jansenist novel? By F.C.Green
5. Paravicino, the gongorist poet. By Eunice Joiner Gates
6. The uses of the term 'baroque'. By James Mark.

Joke Gensen in the cupboard: Is it 'hardon fraud'?
Blue kedd/ködd = kek kedd/ködd (cp. 'royal oak') = blue tuesday (hungarian 'kek kedd'). 12 May was Ragna Gröver's birthday and Sachs' death day and Celan's day of burial and it was a tuesday in 1981. Ezra POUND lived in Rapallo.
Every bloody issue they use! Every bloody day they use it! Every towel bloody. Every bloody day delayed = daily cycle period, one hour time lag. Everybody delayed.
Anna Jensen Meyer = the Berlin wall? = british responsibility claim

The hull co-up-lay: The 'torpedos' were installed at the ship's side when it let the anchor down. The explosives were british and possibly even prepositioned. Which means that the explosives would have been even DATED before the date of deliverance of the Royal Oak. 'For-seilingen', it could be called, cp. 'Nød lærer naken kvinne å spinne'. 'Ködd [Ma non Les caut] lærer naken kvinne å spinne' = 'blue kedd'. One notices the function of the pope as the 'head of flock' = 'flockhead'. This seems to have been a frequent idea in some british poetry, it seemed to me, the struggle of mankind, with getting hold of the spinning wheel, things like that, getting it into the mouth - cp. the Coleridge and the correspondence with the 'sturge' of 1981.

Hence even the attempt on the pope in May 1981 could have been for the purpose of this Royal Oak 1938, and it is only when reading the Modern Language Review that one discovers that he probably was shot in his genitals (a pity they did not say that right out but gave people the chance to doubt the words of the pope or at least his staff - many people probably believed that the pope had been participating in the theatre, for telling people something, when the story was about a bullet which stopped right before his heart): We must hope that 1981 attempt in Rome was not for the purpose of lending force to the activities of 'Literar Mechana' in Vienna - for sinking the 'royal oak' manuscripts of Austria. 'Litt rar med Kanaan' ('a bit strange with Kanaan') = Celan-Meridian 'Literarhistorisch' Gravis - I was not acquainted with Gröver/'Mengele's colon but maybe there is some story there - Mengele was allegedly wounded in the 'war' - which perhaps means only that he had a 'cigar' installed, for example during the war - a 'torpedo', sort of. Cp. the illustrations to the Oslo Report and the GRAV-is factor in what could be a new turn of a political connection program including Ehamgasse = Abr-Eham. This 'Literarhistorisch' could have been a little much in the Meridian lecture. He must of course have got those details from french secret service.

The present article was written when I believed that I had received only one of the two receipts I expected for the two manuscripts I deposited in Vienna on 26 January - and therefore I made the present analysis including some considerations on this matter. Now it turned out on 26 February that I had got both of them nevertheless - in one and the same envelope. I really looked through the contents of the envelope - one page and a card - in search of the other paper but could not find it, but I later found it nevertheless: The second paper was attached on the back side of the first and must have slipped my attention when I looked through the contents of the envelope. I am very sorry for the mistake and there seems to be no reason to suspect Literar-Mechana of any sort of mistake or fraud in this story.

However, even if Literar-Mechana is not involved in such intrigues, they do administer the author rights in Austria and are thereby inevitably vulnerable to political intrigue since 'author rights' apparently is precisely the interest of the nazi politics on 'remote control' of the author's pen. One can therefore add the story with the tigers that died in 'Nandan Kanaan Zoo' in India after I had sent an email to the pope in 2000. I had to associate with 'London Poetry Society' (see also below). Even a deer died along with several of the black-and-white tigers. I followed the story as it progressed in the Hindustan Times on internet - an interesting newspaper. I had sent a letter to the american TC whom I had been acquainted with in Hungary in the spring of 1991 and she sent me an email in return on midsummer day. One black-and-white tiger died that day. When I sent an email to the pope some time later, I think an afternoon or evening, another dozen of the black-and-white tigers died in the course of the following night. Could have been another 12. Cp. the 'Judas' article in MLR of October 2008 at the time of the death of Jörg Haider. I could add also a strange phenomenon from the perioical Poetry Review published by London Poetry Society: It was while I studied some correlations between my own poetry and photos I took that I discovered that at least two of the photos had strangely relevant 'parallels' on the front page of the Poetry Review. I had to believe that these were cases of 'poetic telepathy' - otherwise I would have been forced to believe that my computer was tapped and the material sent to the society in London. That would have meant a swindle society - and at least in those days of Ehamgasse in Vienna I would never have thought of them like that. But after the recent discovery of the character of the Modern Language Review, I have now got the chance to revise my view on britons generally. When I later sent TC a copy of the first part of my Endmorgan Quartet, there occurred some days later in The Hindustan Times a notice that the Indian secret services had received a copy of Osama bin Laden's collected writings.

Conclusion on the attempt on the pope in 1981: It could have been for installing with british responsibility claim the Black Sea Loop from Turkey over Vienna towards Paris where it meets with the US french connection since 1969 - with a british responsibility claim which lifts it over the canal in the last step. That last step of lifting could perhaps have been contained in the 1981 story. This 'black sea loop' is probably the same as 'black see lobe' = the 'third eye' of the GAS-PAS-GAS. See July 1986 for the passing-away of Petter Andre Syversen.

The magazine can be read as a responsibility-claim publication series and can serve to bring to the end the long period of gastalk about politics and terror. Here it is possible to come to the point - as perhaps also was the theme of the attempt in 1981. If that is the story, it could be that the austrian authors who use the manuscript storage and registration system are invited to understand what it is - and the 1981 attempt could be taken to mean that they have expressed a tacit consent by registering a manuscript there. It would mean that the austrians have agreed to the Black Sea Loop. Of course they have not and the authors have not either. The terror is published in advance but the authors do not tell it to the public?

Chaucer's shipman in real life, by Margaret Galway = "tosser's shipman of Royal Oak in real life: Margaret Wrongway": Hence not only have they agreed to this terrorism on basis of their manuscripts, but they are even doing it themselves! Drafts to books by austrian authors can of course be used for selecting victims of verboten torture, and then we already now can hear the distant future echos of oxford-english summary of the horrendous culture in Austria in those days. The britons simply had to stop the madness.

I add the 'Modern Language Review' account-in-advance of the flooding on Rekustad where I lived in 1977-1978 - it is in the October 1977 issue. It was in the cold winter 1977-78 that the kitchen tap had been opened while I was away and when I returned the ice had thawed and it had leaked over the floor, and frozen again. I could not find an explanation. I spent the time in the home of my then chief at the library department where I worked. I worked there from the autumn 1977 to the end of 1978. To have a relation to one of the employees in the department - and she was even 19 years older than me - was probably not appropriate - I was even only 20 years old, and it may be that it was not really my decision that I should spend some weeks in her home. Free choice, of course, as usual. It was cold and frozen up there in the old farmhouse next to Simon Walther Hauge's farm (whose presence seems to have been installed with the July 1975 issue from the 'cucumber season', cp. the possible gurkha in Nepal - a 'slange-menneske'?). I was recurring up there a few times but when I came the last time (could it have been in February?) there was this frozen flooding on the floor. The place is called Rekustad - 'reke-staa' = 'shrimp-stand' and it can mean a 'small erection' in norwegian - and seems to have been on the schedule of the magazine since July 1975 when I (if I remember right and it was not earlier) was first acquainted with Simon Walther Hauge. The question is who opened the tap. I only borrowed the house since it otherwise would have been left empty and vulnerable, and there was hardly an unbroken window there when I moved in. I repaired most of them. I could of course not pay for such a water leak if there were expensive repairs of the old house, but I must assume that the owner had insurance of it. Also, I believed that I had not really opened the tap - but how could it be explained then? At that time, I could not find any other explanation than my own hand. I threw the ice out and believed that the damage would not be too bad. Could be I mentioned it briefly for the owner when I gave back the keys in the spring 1978. However, from the October 1977 issue, it seems that all this was planned in advance - which also means that it could have been a part of the Eisenhower doctrine #3, according to my analysis - and there one can even spot the name of the library department chief in whose flat I lived in that cold winter. (It is one of the 8 names plus 1973 test intro which can be spotted in the Eisenhower doctrine):

1. A new Reynold - Milnes letter: Were there two meetings between Keats and Coleridge? By Donald Lange
2. 'A season of awakening': An analysis of chapter five of Mill's 'autobiography'. By James McDonnell
3. Language and gesture in 'Great expectations'. By Ian Ousby
4. Jean-Baptiste Chassignet's debt to Diego de Estella. By Catherine Grisé
5. Polyeucte's martyrdom - 'Une autre explication'. By William S.Brooks
6. Saint-John Perse and Joseph Conrad: Some notes and an uncollected letter. By Roger Little.
7. The creator's game: Some reflections on Robbe-Grillet's 'Le Voyeur'. By Valerie Minogue
8. Biblical borrowings in Goethe's 'Faust': A historical survey of their interpretation. By O.Durrani
9. 'The forest's revenge': Subconscious motivation in 'The wild duck'. By Joan Carr.
10. Pushkin's 'Boris Godunov': The first modern russian historical drama. By Ervin C.Brody

'Reynold - Milnes' sounds like 'Raino Malnes' who was a schoolmate of mine from Frydenberg high school. He later became a professor in social sciences in Oslo. But I would doubt that he had been in there to turn the tap. But maybe somebody else did. Were there two meetings between 'Kitchen Tap'? Kitsch and Tap? Well it was a tap but it was very cold and the water had frozen in the sink and ran over the edge, the ridge of the sink. The brink of the rink. Kitsch and Tap? How many meetings were there really?

'A season of awakening' could of course have explained the mystery how my keys could have gone astray if somebody else had gone in there while I was in the home of the library colleague. The keys could perhaps even have been copied while I slept (more or less heavily) or was in the bath? Depends on who was there, of course. (I think there was some other construction with mention of 'slippers'). Which means that the question is whether the colleague would have done that job for somebody.

Then followed the flooding and I don't know if there was any need for paying for any damages. I suppose insurance could have been involved. If there had been a 'voyeur' there, peeping in through the window, they could have reported that the floor was just overfilled with water and hence my talk of 'only very little and probably frozen all of it' would perhaps not really do if there had been 'voyeurs' there.

In the 9th article ('The forest's revenge'), there is the step where I am supposed to find a goodenough pretext for having opened the tap subconsciously: I had been raped in my childhood (a 'child wuck', cp. the 'sherwood anderson' of 1963, although I do not suspect him) and that was the reason why my hand could have opened the tap without my knowledge.

Bussens 'Hvor skal du nå?' Somebody on the bus. I moved down to Voldgaten 1. See the January 1978 issue for the concept of 'the turning of the tap' - it is ONE YEAR LATER. Which means Vienna, Austria? It seems that all titles in this issue have titles which imitate a hand's turning of the kitchen tap.

Of course April 1970 contains the story of the end of Sachs and Celan.

1. The spanish source of Edmund Tilney's 'Flower of Friendshippe'. By Ernest J. Moncada
2. Ovid, Juvenal, and 'the silent woman': A reconsideration. By John Ferns
3. The paradox of reason: Argument in Rochester's 'Satyr against mankind'. By Charles A.Knight
4. A rhetorical topic in 'Tristram Shandy'. By Graham Petrie
5. Beauty is truth - once more. By Marco Minkoff
6. The making of 'Sylvia's lovers'. By John McVeagh
7. An unpublished letter by Mérimée. By A.W.Raitt
8. The sources of André Gide's 'Thésée'. By Patrick Pollard
9. Society as mediator in Simone Weil's 'Venise Sauvée'. By J.P.Little
10. The function of letters in Fontane's 'Unwiederbringlich'. By Frances M. Subiotto
11. Brecht's 'Puntila': A marxist comedy. By E.Speidel
12. The strange history of Dr.F and the dismantling of Courtavenel. By Patrick Waddington

It seems that one can read Celan = Ancel, as 1-2-3-4 = 3-4-2-1 or 3-4-1-2. Spanish = kneecaps etc. 20 April 1970 was a Monday, and it was Adolf Hitler's birthday (there is a M.Tissier mentioned on p.342 i #12) 'In Freundschaft verboten'? It was NAL-e-vuj and the endless man-ow. Doctors, Kore Filling, spanish source. Venise Sauvée = Tarjei Vesaas? If one 'functions' the letters in 'Unwiederbringlich', it can come out as 'John Bjarne Gröver'. 'Puntlær' = a kind of strong leather, sometimes jocularly used for the virginal membrane. Could be there is Celan in the first half (1-6) and Sachs in the second (7-12). One notices also the peculiar encoding of the name of Jean Bollack in the sense of 'an-je' = 'Ancel' in the first half and 'lack-ob' = 'lokk-opp' = 'open up' in the second. Was even Bollack encoded in that issue of April 1970? The last title, #12, is a story about a person who shares some elements with Dr.Gröver/'Mengele. There is even in the last endnote a sort of map or scheme showing a house on a property - with an arrow showing where the sought-for element can be found. (One notices the train accident at the platform of Paddington in London - as 'ved trikk Paddington'). Sachs' death certificate after her death on 12 May 1970 was signed by Dr.P.Lindell, with the cause 'ca.coli' = 'cancer coli'. Title #12 could perhaps read Dr. F.Dindel = dismantling of colon w/anal = ca.coli. Cp. also Andre Gide in #8. There is a sketch of a map at the end of the article #12 which shows the district of 'Brie' - and if Celan were abducted to a desolate place in the evening 19 April 1970 or early 20 April, one could speculate if this sketch of a map is telling of the place. He was found on 1 May not far from Boulogne-Billancourt with its 4 September road. The place on the map is called Courtavenel at the Bois de Blandureau and Jouy.

Strangely, one can spot traces of his name even in the issue before the disappearance of Peter Szondi on 18 October 1971. He was found in Berliner Halensee on 9 November. Bollack gave a speech in the funeral and was entrusted the care of his manuscripts after his death. Here is the front page of MLR for July 1971:

1. Rabelais and 'The water-babies' [cp. the bubbles and the water-szondi]
2. An episode in 'Jourdain de Blaivies' [cp. an apy Szondi 'shiner de blåveis']
3. Manzoni and french literature [cp. P.Szondi and 'french literature'?]
4. The personages of the 'Poema de mio cid' [P Szondi etc]
5. The sermons of Eckhart and Tauler
6. Schiller and 'Die Kinder des Hauses' [P-eater and the son of yours = Peter Szondi]

Blåveis = the blue anemone, but it can also mean 'black eye' or 'shiner'.

Eckhart and Tauler = e drar t an Dtauler = 'Drotninghaug' [the farm in Sykkylven, alleged origin of John Jensen's mother Inga Olsen, hence 'inngir olsen'] = 'shiner de blåveis' Black Sea. I recall Gröver/'Mengele' telling me while we (or rather I) were painting (or rather staining) some wooden material (I think a grid for flowers [roses, probably, cp. 'inngi rosen'] to climb on) in Molde that a part weakly covered was called 'helligdag' = 'holyday' - "you have a holiday there" he said and pointed to a pale surface I had not covered well enough. Could be it could mean 'shiner de blåveis'. 'Bollack' rewrites to 'Black O' = 'Black Sea', hence the 'Jean Bollack' can be taken to mean the 'Black Sea Loop'.

It should then be noticed that the strategy of british administration seems to be to hijack the enthusiasm from those who have achieved major progress for the society - such as Lenin's revolution for which he was credited with the apparent murder of 1924. 'Rosen' can mean both the rose flower and the good reception of a work. Could be Szondi had made some good work and was credited with verboten torture before he was dumped in the water. If so, then it would be wise to take care to prevent that the austrian authors are treated and credited similarly with 'da spritze Reich'. If e.g. british secret service can scan the deposited manuscripts for talents, that could also be the targets for a verboten strategy.

When this seems to be a magazine of british responsibility claims, and it has a tradition of a century, there can be no doubt that this seems to be a matter of national british responsibility claims. Which means that the attempt on the pope in 1981 even could be considered an assault from the anglican church? When this 'moralist' story has been going for many decades, the problem is that there is not much sense in sitting down to discuss these things with the britons. Which means that the rest of the world must start making conclusions on what this story is about. It is fully legitimate to have opinions on the correspondence between the magazine and real-world events following after the publications of it, however much the britons may argue that these are coincidences. GAS-PAS-GAS 'third eye' is there, the alleged death of PAS in Botswana 7 August 1986 (the July issue, or was it April), the US embassy bombings 12 years later, on 7 August 1998 etc. The references are very obvious. Palme, Aldo Moro, etc etc. I think even president Harding 1923. It seems that all major cases of terrorism are represented in advance in that BRITISH magazine. The rest of the world is completely free to mean what they want about this. It is very urgently important that the rest of the world stops this Black Sea Loop and Ehamgasse Visthouse project before it comes into being. If it starts, then it can come to be too late.

Modern Language Review has existed since Visthouse was built in Vistdal and could well be exactly the same project. If people get to know about this 'Visthouse' (or even 'Vistdal' = 'Wiesenthal'?) paper from England, the problem of politics could boil down to how to delimit England.

The receipt has not yet arrived (18 February). The other one arrived on Monday 9 Feb. "It will be sent in the post". It has not arrived, and I should suppose that it does not arrive at all. I cannot find out where the problem is - if it is in Austria or in the italian post. With the death of Klestil and Haider, one could assume that there could have been a coup there.

The school dentist in Molde was called Ziegler. She was a 'sealer' when she was sealing the holes in the teeth. She was so good to stand on skis that it was told that she had skied down not only 'dame-fallet' (cp. 'Fal-chaasen'?) but even the steep wall behind Varden called 'Hell' ('Helvete', not 'Helvetia'). Could have been a variant of the old Faust legend among the schoolchildren. She used to go dressed in a grey coat - military style sort of, or even Bogart. Many of the schoolchildren were probably acquainted with her calming 'tate' but perhaps not with her 'lyle'. The film 'Moulin Rouge' contains the character 'Zidler'. 'Paveattentatet' = 'the attempt on the pope'. 'På-vatten-tate' tells that the 'tate' is on the 'tampon' in the mouth, as if it should have been an egg. There were discussions (among the prepuberty children) on how many hairs she had in her nostrils. There was even a story of 'children cruelty' when the children in the class in Molde appointed to bring pegs for putting on the nose of one of the girls with a telling name (the story was on my website 2004-2007) - I brought a peg but did not put it on, but today I understand why this happened. I notice the death of Jörg Haider. In 1999 I changed the spelling of my name from Grøver to Grover, without thereby insinuating that e.g. Gordon Brown should do the same.

Ziegler as a political phenomenon (cp. also 'My pet goat' of 11/9-2001) could have been based on fragments of children's dialogue tapped by adults: There was talk of the hair in her nose, about her breast, her coat, the skiing. She was german and that naturally invoked some rumour talk. It may be that she was not even involved. The coat is something I observed a few times in the winter but is not likely to have been the topic of a dialogue in those days. The pegs could perhaps have been an intrigue from adult side - could it even have been from as far as Washington? Discussions on 'her contract' - 'do you think she has a 'contract' or not'? - is not likely to be children's talk, it is more in the world of CIA and similars to think that way. The story of her skiing down 'Hell' would also necessarily have had some source - I suppose it was not she who told it to the schoolchildren. (By the way, I noticed that a person of relevance seemed to have moved to Hell in Vistdal around the time when I was in contact with the person whom I later met briefly in Mariahilferstrasse at the end of 2005).

If 'Ziegler' or a microphone in her office is the theme of politics, it could have been about the Tintoretto "The temptation of San Antonio" in the San Trovaso church in Venice, close to the 1444 Michele Giambono of 'San Crysogono a cavallo'. (Source of reproduction from San Trovaso is in the publication 'Chiesa di San Trovaso' by Marcianum Press, 'il prato' casa editrice and the Giambono is from the postcard sold in the church, by Associazione sant'Apollonia). On the Tintoretto, the 'tit' is offered above while the assistence with loosening the textiles - possibly of Ole Devold? - around the genitals is offered below. They combine for a 'done' and a 'patt-er-sånn', and there are even an 'Arild' and an 'L-i-no-hår' there - above the breast, not under. I notice that the hair even resembles the one of Celan's alleged friend Bollack, Jean - the photos in Celan/Szondi 'Briefwechsel'. 'Patt-er-sånn' does not mean 'patr-i-arch'. ('The Beatles' seems to be a source of this secret history perhaps almost as 'reliable' as 'Modern Language Review', and 'Elinor Rigby' could be this 'patt-er-sånn' figure - and would Lennon's 'Steel and glass' be about 'Gil and strass', Gil being Lenin's driver?). One can recognize aspects of the Fredrikstad environments, and the angelic being in the air above San Antonio could perhaps be recognized in the leafage canopy under which we were driving into the dust road at Aure-Osen in the late sixties. Ziegler as a political phenomenon could be about swapping these two elements up and down. When Bush arrested a spy called 'Hansen' after he had been taken in the act of picking up diamonds (which would mean that it was 'Handsen' who was the victim of 'laser beam treatment'? - but there is another Tintoretto and a copy of one in the same church, and these are closer to the Black Sea Loop and Dead Sea Scroll symbolisms), if I remember right, it could have been about this Tintoretto. And the 'brolly hand-le' could be the reason why Gudrun Harlan's brolly handle has attracted some interest? The face of the rider in the 'Giambono' is so similar to Ragna Gröver (in some 'essential' way) that it could be the entire story - possibly including even the 'tribunes' of Sadat, Kadyrov etc. Even the Falklands war and the school shooting in the Johann Gutenberg high school in Germany? The chin of San Crysogono is more like mine, though, and the story seems to be that this quasi-proves the 'genetic' relation to Ragna Gröver. The VAS with cross above on the shield of San Crysogono could be recognized in the 'Keith Vaz' name in the british government (and I think there was a Kees Vaes in 'John Benjamins' - 'nursk i kesen' or not - when my 'submorphemic' book was rejected in 1995 at the time of the Oklahoma bombing - and one notices that this suggests that the russians probably were not involved in the 'submarinic sinking' in 2000), and it could even have been recognized as inherent in the 'BA38' symbolism. The diagonal line going from the 'John Jensen' in the lower righthand side of the Tintoretto painting up to the 'devil' in the lefthand side could be the Gröver/'Mengele' aspect of the story.

On 23 January, a woman was shot outside the school 'Slettaelva' in Norway. 'Schoolgirl', 'skulker'. 'Sletta-elva' means 'deleted the eleven' or 'deleted the river', cp. the idea of 'authorship' to files written on a computer if there is remote access to it which could delete text or files. (I personally could interpret the case also as being about my insertion on 11 January 2009 - before I considered the book 'The Dreamer' completed - of a file I had stored away since 1994 on another directory - there is even mention there of 'Vinmonopolet' - not 'Wien-monopolet' - which means that if the murder at Slettaelva was political, it could even have been about an attempt to hijack my book in advance on the assumption that the computer could have been tapped - in which case of course the relevance of this for the story of Gaza looks potentially urgently important). There was a file on my computer in 1998 or 1999 with 'ellipsis' at the Granny Smith part of the manuscript to 'The Dreamer' (it looked as follows, and the nonsense symbols take the place of 1573 word = 8733 keystrokes of text which had been deleted but which I could restore later: " a highly non-random distribution: It is be" """"""""""" """"""""""""""""""" "!"""#"$"%"&"'"(")"*"+"," "."/"0"1"2"3"4"5"6"7"8"9":""<"=">"?"@"A"B"C"D"E"F"G"H"I"J"K"L"M"N"O"P"Q"R"S"T"U"V"W"X"Y"Z"["\"]"~"_"`"a"b"c"d"e"f"g"h"i"j"k"l"m"n"o"p"q"r"s"t"u"v"w"x"y"z"{"|"}"~" "."Figure 1"""""""""""" with were named Smith. This is all the more peculiar since Smith is a rather seldom name in Norway") and I concluded that somebody would have been on the computer for doing it if it were not a result of some virus, but I never had this computer on the internet. Clinton was later out on town with Roberta Flack (not Bogart frock, nor Judenfleck), told the news. I notice the schoolgirl with the story of the pegs in Molde. If my computer is tapped, then one would have known in advance around 23 January that I would have to try and deposit the manuscript somewhere (which I did on 26 January). Gjemmes på'n, jeg må spå'n. This was before the registration, not after such as Susanne Osthoff would have been.

I was in a Cannaregio street and a girl who ran after the birds bent down towards a bird under a table apparently to attack it where it was hiding underneath. In the passing, I put a hand on her righthand shoulder as if she were the bird and I the girl. I wrote about it a little later on my computer. Some time after that again, the local library closed from 16 February to 29 March due to repairs to prevent 'bad smells'. I don't know if the scene in the street could have been surveyed by a bird's eye from satellite - or if it could have been tapped from my computer. If it was from the computer, then clearly even the november 2008 stuff could have been.

But if my computer is tapped (are the new SATA hard drives more vulnerable to tapping than the former ones?), and if the project should be a turnaround of Ziegler's role with mine, then registration by "Ziegler's deposit" in sealed envelope could be enough for the tappers to 'open the envelope'. 'Plomber' is the norwegian name of the 'fillings', cp. 'Kore Filling' and 'promperen', 'brannbilen'. And then the attempt on the pope, including massive attention and intention all over the world, could be the channel in the historic consciousness for spreading the political effect. One does not even have to interpret hypothetical genetic relations.

My work is not for business purposes - it is serious work for bringing literature and poetic logic forwards. And it is definitely wrong to abuse my work for spreading propaganda material. I think that even I should be allowed to sell some copies of my work.

The world is clearly crazy when it knows about this Modern Language Review and tells not loudly about it but lets it continue like a Visthouse publication for a hundred years. "Doesn't matter, just go on", the world seems to say - and that could even have been contained in the attempt on the pope - an inherent blame - holy wrath! - because the Vatican permits for such state terrorism which even has been heralded in advance! The assassinations of Lenin, Kennedy, Sachs, Celan, Moro, John Paul II, Palme, Rabin, Haider and many others can typically be traced to the titles of articles in a preceding issue! The death of Gisele Celan-Lestrange could be traced to January 1991 ('Sheridan Le Fanu's symptomatic gothic') when I got my residence permit double-stamped in the passport in Hungary. 'Bleich seen through Balzac' = the double stamp in the passport, including 'ervenytelen' = 'invalid'. And the death of Gröver/'Mengele' on 27 November 1990 could perhaps be traced to the October 1916 issue (yes, it seems to be about that 'Shah' with the princess on the other side). And the 'old issue' of Paris 1830. The reason why I got a stipend also in Bergen was according to Kirsti Koch Christensen that I had included a pilot study in the application - and the collapse of Versailles Banquet hall in Bethlehem street in Talpiot, Jerusalem, in May 2000 can likewise be found on a front page. It is that January 1924 which I could look up for testing my hypothesis that it was my official grandmother Laura Helene Devold (later married Eidsvig) who shot Lenin in the company of Vidkun Quisling in Gorki on 21 January 1924 - the day before the MacDonald government was started in London - and indeed the list of titles of that issue confirms the hypothesis very well. There is even a 'Titia' which perhaps could be part of a political project on Ziegler if that is the story.

And so the turnaround inherent in the attempt on the pope - as if it were about blaming the Vatican for allowing the britons to continue that terrorist program heralded in advance, as if everybody should agree to the aspirations of the british throne to become the crown of the world, with unrestricted licence to do what they want - and indeed nobody protests against it! - that is when the world is crazy - is dumped on me when the story is all and only about finding a teeny weeny little trace of a social factor which lets somebody else find the publisher for me. The british 'Visthouse publication' seems to affiliate the terror with me, at least there are traces of it, and to allow for such identification of it with me would mean suggesting the 'containment of the beast' in the sense of me instead of 'containment of England' which should have been the appropriate conclusion to such terrorist politics. If my manuscripts are lifted more or less immediately into british secret service for conducting new terror ia agents around the world, that is because nobody helps me with finding a publisher. In Vienna, it seems - that was at least my impression when I studied some of them - that more or less every huge outdoor commercial poster - and there are not many square centimetres left in the air of Vienna which is not turned into such a poster - was using aspects of me and my authorship for advancing the british-terrorist policy of dr.Verboten, and where can I expect to find any help there? If the social factor never surfaces, and I am still writing this website in complete solitude and have to dump my ideas here instead of having the chance to work them out into better shape, and people do not answer, then the souls in Vienna can come to look like commercial advertisement for Verboten in the belief that it is the opposite. They sit down to write - and the story or letter articulates itself in the soul. What an enormous propaganda mill that Vienna advertisement world is. (It is, comparably, a paradise here in Italy when there is no or almost no commercial outdoor advertisement). And then it could be easy, so extremely easy, to run the Black Sea Loop over Vienna conducted from London.

Power-orientation is when one struggles with turning it this way or that way: Am I the british terror-propaganda channel or is it the other way round? If one arranges an exhibition or opens a new shop with some item in the righthand side of the street, then it will turn this way, and if one launches a new attack on the policy of some remote group, ethnic or whatever. it will turn the other way. A shop selling socks in a street with a telling name. And so goes the life of 'culture'. That is power struggle and that is what they make the mythology for. With turning it around, one can make people believe e.g. that it was the jewish-genetic diaspora who arranged the holocaust. And then everybody will vote the other way and history is on their side and it is easy to run the black sea loop. And so the opponents of this trick will invest all their efforts into finding an even smarter turnaround trick back again. If only a small piece of new knowledge is produced by a person who has just a little creativity left, the power-orientation hops on it for turning it this and that way in a struggle of power.

Truth-orientation is to tell right out what is the mythological basis for these power-games, and one tells it for bringing an end to the otherwise endless back-and-forth-turning of the construction and for making it possible to allow for more interesting work which can bring the global society forwards. Power-struggle believes that such truth-telling is an enemy of the state and our culture and traditions: "There's nothing left of all we have built". Intellectuals should not believe that the power-orientation can bring the world forwards. Are there any intellectuals left at all?

Power-struggle should not be a legitimate parametre for building a society. It should not be permitted in politics at all. It was the crisis of the proletariat which seemed to justify it and which lent some flavour of 'being right' to the communists and leftists of those days, but to agree to the 'power-struggle' of e.g. a british terrorist administration is not the same! The britons and Hitler couped the revolution from Lenin and now people believe that the nazis are justified in the power-orientation! And that philology and scholarship is what you find in Modern Language Review!

It is totally incredible. All this seems to be about me - 'fra din mors Iliads Leonie' seems to be the reason why only Laura Devold could derail the revolution by shooting Lenin, and that is why Lenin discovered this in 1918 and arranged the attempt on himself in advance by way of Fanny Kaplan, in order for Laura Devold's attack to be only a pale copy. One must believe that the original Laura could have been smuggled in as Quisling's young wife 'Asha', and that could even have been the purpose with that first marriage. Quisling could have held a profile as a friend of the revolution - and even his mentor Nansen was a devout believer in the bolshevik revolution untill Lenin was dead after which he turned 180 degrees around - for which reason Quisling and his wife could be let in. Here is an excerpt from my 'Whited sepulchres' which I gave to the israeli embassy in early 2004: "Quisling had been in Kharkov in Ukraina as Nansen's close collaborator. He first seems to have married a 17 year old girl - Alexandra who worked in his office and he brought her back to Norway. There are indications that they had no sexual relationship but appeared as married. The first wife, who used to be much made-up with red lipstick, went to Crime and he then married his next wife, Maria, in Kharkov allegedly before the first marriage was dissolved. Even she worked at his office. Hans Fredrik Dahl in his biography of Quisling says that no formal evidence of the marriages exist. It was a slightly delicate matter and it looked like 'bigamy' and at least a triangle. The three people used to be together, it seems". This suggests a long-term strategy which could have been for smuggling Laura Devold in. Would they have been arrested and executed after shooting Lenin, or was this plot already in 1918 so strong that it was the reason for the rise of Stalin? Quisling was from 'Fyresdal'. Lenin died 1970 days after Kaplan's alleged attempt. If Laura is conceived of as having been arrested and executed after shooting Lenin, the successful british-nazi hijacking of Lenin's revolution means that the original Laura could be presented as a 'hero of the revolution' if she had sacrificed herself for the sake of the revolutionary britons. And the new Laura - who could have been 'Asha' after the two exchanged passports in Paris - was too weak in her hand and trigger-finger to open even a kitchen tap! The name 'Lenin' was likely to be because of Leonie Sachs - Lenin is likely to have taken the name in solidarity with the jewish-genetic diaspora in contrast to the plans of the nazis to prove that administrative logic is stronger than the poetic logic of the human mind, and Lenin of course favoured the poetic logic of the free spirit in a stateless community rather than the tyrannic and totalitarian administrative logic which has been developed from England since Boole 1850 and MacDonald 1924. Which means that the whole story in fact is about my person - and nobody says a word! And I have to struggle with my small means and am intrigued around from place to place and cannot afford a new place and have to use Vienna because the fee is only 10 euros there. I tell the jewish museum "please send me that receipt of book which you promised so that I do not have to believe that the ambiguities about 'painting' in the house is the answer from you" - and there is no response at all. And I don't even know if the post functions - maybe they sent a letter but it never arrived. And so the bombing of Gaza is likely to be taken to be the 'publication' of my book - which could be on behalf of those who also arrange 'submarinic signification' in Russia and 'diary novel' attack on USA. Clearly it could be urgent ('det ha[r]sta') for me to have the book deposited and registered when on 26 January I went to 'Literar Mechana', in particular if the attack on Gaza had been on the background of tapping of my computer. And nobody says "we can make a garage publication for you - we make an adhoc publishing house for this special book and print a hundred copies and store them in the garage and sell them to people who order them by post or pay cash or in the bookshop over there". That would be the social factor which could rescue the world and bring an end to the misunderstanding everywhere that the current nazi revolution - with the war against the intellectuals - is Lenin's revolution of the proletariat. But the only thing which people can say is apparently "why don't you do that yourself". That is when the world agrees to the british monarchy (or rather those who use it for gaining the power) and its 'MacDonald government' with its licence to do anything. And no sooner has one agreed to this for an hour or two, the ability to think is sinking into a dark abyss of commercial nazi propaganda and people cannot think any longer and are giving in to the administrative logic of the nazi revolution of the british Hitler.

And so political instinct who reads this jumps up and thinks: "This is too bad! I must throw a bomb somewhere!" How incredible can it be? PEOPLE MUST USE WORDS AND NOT ACTS and one must be very explicit and outspoken on these matters. "But what about a strike? On Selfdo Square?" Power is not the right approach anyhow. Truth is about making the words unambiguous on these matters.

"When this 'moralist' story has been going for many decades, the problem is that there is not much sense in sitting down to discuss these things with the 'drittsekk'. Which means that the rest of the world must start making conclusions on what this story is about... The rest of the world is completely free to mean what they want about this. It is very urgently important that the rest of the world stops this 'third eye lobe' and Ehamgasse Visthouse project..." Which of course would be dirty UK/US smear campaign for turning it around in just that power-game sense of it. In short, if there has been terror going on, I am not involved.

I can add that I got a letter in 1996 from 'Gard' Nyquist (married to a dutch and they were once living in a house close to the Gröver/'Mengele's in Kongensgate 8), Gröver/'Mengele's assistant doctor and later chief doctor in the psychiatric hospital Veum, after he had spoken with Ragna Gröver.

In 2006 or maybe 2007, I called Jean Bollack in the belief that he had been a friend of Celan, as told the biographies, but he gave the receiver to his wife as soon as he heard my name.

I am not crazy, and it was not me who knocked down the twin towers on Manhattan in 2001.

There are, in short, reasons to believe, on basis of the evidence in the story with my diary novel, that it could have been Clinton who was behind for example the Oklahoma bombing and USA 11 September 2001 (see discussion of indexing of the attack in MLR at the end of this article), and one adds the MLR before the US embassy bombings in Africa, and the purpose could have been to leave the role of terrorist onto me. (I do not know who was behind it, of course, and this is on basis of the data discussed here).

The story with the registration of my manuscript in the deposit in Vienna seems to have suffered a fate possibly related to the stories with death of Klestil and Haider at the time of the registration of my address. There are reasons to believe that this could be due to british interests with a 'diagonal replacement strategy': That is the strategy which replaces good with evil and vice versa.

If today there is a 'gust of evil' around due to various factors, could be there is a gust from that periodical, one notices that the slogan for Blair's government was 'the purest of the pure'. It is the story with Laura and Bjarne and Aron Eidsvig which seems to be the basis for this 'diagonal replacement' when people believe that it is Lenin's poetic communist revolution England is running - and then it is nothing but Hitler's nazi revolution! People are still cheated because of that Klipra connection, and that is likely to be the reason why the receipt for my manuscript still has not arrived but may be abused by the (interests of) british government. Lenin tried to tell this with Kaplan in 1918, but Josef Stalin = VI-Stdalen = Vistdalen with Visthouse made it instead (cp. also 'Wiesenthal'). Lenin called himself Lenin because of Leonie Sachs, while Stalin called himself Stalin because of Laura Devold in Visthouse. Which suggests that Stalin was an agent for England. That is likely to be the reason why Fyre-Sdalen could just walk out after the young Devold had shot Lenin, as seems from MLR to have been the case.

This also means that Israel's attack on Gaza could have been made on background of surveillance of my computer and that it could have been in support of just England and a clintonean Oklahoma and 11 September program. It looks the opposite, and so forth. The attack on Gaza could have been made for creating the impression that it is I - and not England - who have attacked jewish interests with my work. The military operation in Gaza was called 'Cast lead', cp. my own title 'Lead lusions in a bowl' and the concept of 'castrate': There was a lot of 'scrot-um' = 'mess-around' (a 'holy mess' it was) in my home studio in Bergen in the house of Berstad (not Ludendorf!) when somebody would have been on the computer on 22 November 1999. I was waiting for the message that I had got economic support to continue my work, but it turned the wrong way with the wrong message on the door and now the 'military operation' was called 'Cast lead'.

And if so, the big question is why the US republicans do not publish the facts of the terrorism. They cannot outlaw the US democrat party? Well there would have been a coup in the democrat party if this is the story (such policy is not in their program) and the party and the rest of the world must be informed about it! For every day which passes under such conditions, the republican party is likely to become more and more of an opposition party untill it is too late to tell the truth. Do they fear that the dignity and authority and respect for the president in the White House can be endangered if the news leak out? I would say it could be very much the other way round! Of course even a president can be struck with madness - and then it is urgently important to protect the president and not his madness!

Similarly, every administrator who knows the facts and do not tell me that I was raped by Hitler and tortured by Mengele in my infancy - on the assumption that this was the story - are in fact announcing to the world that they protect Hitler and Mengele and their policy: They protect the madness instead of the president.

It is possible that the delay of the receipt for my manuscript deposit in Vienna could be due to political attempts to make my person and work identical with national programs - in England or Norway or both. Research networks, success authors, hollywood... And possibly Israel as the third step - could be by the attack on Gaza. It is very important that people understand that this could be a sort of rape of my work and there is no legitimacy for it at all and I certainly most would explicitly protest against it. The reason why such abuse is extremely dangerous for the world is in that british Lenin-hijacking with me as the key element for the conversion.

It could be a tragedy for my work if people believe that it is a british project or that it is representing british values. One should notice very well also that Modern Language Review made a british-national responsibility claim on the murders of Sachs and Celan in their April 1970 issue - that certainly adds much to this situation.

I am saying it again that this athens jewish-museum story was felt as one of the worst events I can remember. Could be one can consider it again in 20 years time to see how it could have been the reason why it went wrong. I certainly should not have given the book to the museum, as was my conclusion when it was too late, but maybe I will have to downgrade my view on judaism to a sort of self-contained religious group which has lost some of its interest. One cannot be friendly with people if one risks being attacked for it. Could be many people feel it like that. Could be there are agents in many key positions of the diaspora, and if the present ideas about Israel have a rooting in reality, it may be that israeli security is running propaganda warnings against the 'monster' - in addition to the mutilation of my social interface which the attacks on Lebanon and Gaza could have represented. The story seems to mean that the jews are listening to those british nazis who hijacked Lenin's jewish-genetic poetic revolution ('Josef-Stalin' is likely to be the same 'Vistdalen' as 'Wiesenthal') and it may well be that they take instruction from those incredible 'philosophers' who could be inclined to murder Klestil and Haider for the sake of the 'registration of address' in the chomskyan push-down/phrase-structure construction of a third eye 'cognitive politics' - or here 'registration of information in a database'. The diaspora listens to Israel - that could be what it means.

The memory of 3 September 1960

On 3 September 1960, Paul Celan seems to have visited me outside the house in Odda. This certainly would have been the great thing in my childhood, but it would have been impossible to store the memory of it consciously without getting into serious conflict with the environments who certainly would have demolished as much as they could if they had got hold of what happened and what was said. If I had remembered something precious, they would have detected it and ridiculed it and demolished it with formal disrespect, is the feeling I had. That is also why I could not write any interesting poetry as long as I was in contact with the background family. From Odda I remember only the 'rathunt' - as a sort of categorial interface between the two fathers - the genetic and the custody father - on a format which could have been acceptible for the custody parents. The memory includes me hitting the rat (a sort of 'm[o]use') with a broom on its paw ('Pau') among the stones of 'the basement' = 'kjellarn' = 'Celarn' and so forth - in a format which Gröver/'Mengele' could appreciate. He could probably not decide from my memory - if I told it or at least I remembered it myself - that it was unlikely since one cannot hit a rat on its paw with a broom.

But the real memory had to be stored somewhere, otherwise it could have been forgotten. The theory is that Midori is the memory stored in the historic consciousness - and since Celan could not tell it after 1970, there would have been the need for a resurrection of my genetic parents in terms of this memory. I would have been the wonderchild relative to Celan. The meeting is represented on the front page of my TEQ - with a 'knocking' version of it on the poster to Baz Luhrmann's new film 'Australia'. "Thanks for your knocking answer - / save the music in my ears" I wrote in my TEQ book 'Winter Princess' on 8 September 2000. (Poetic language grasps in a few seconds what it can take years to articulate in the slow world of down-to-earth prose). One notices that the main character in the film seems to be Mr.Drover, cp. Ziegler and Zidler. (Isn't there mention of 'Billabong' in the film? Akhmad Kadyrov? One notices that 'in-grid' Betancourt perhaps could be taken to be about 'Bologne-Billancourt').

This could also have been the background for political interests in Midori. The nazis certainly would conclude that violin would have been the right instrument for her in the role of 'historic memory' since she [does not] play[s] on a 'rebuilt cigar box' a la Gröver/'Mengele' but on a real musical instrument, but that is rather telling of the background of the story - with the need for a categorial interface which the nazis could accept. Ah, say the nazis, you mean cat's guts? Probably not cat-guts on a cigar box, but rather strings - not really in a cantorial diagonal sense of it, such as the nazis can accept, but strings nevertheless. Like the names Tructory Atgill and Duncan Blue - it is not the peak of lyricism in those paper flat names, but strings they are.

And so Midori quickly became world famous after the death of the two poets in 1970, and the world would not forget it. This is clearly a much better explanation to the story than this 'Mengele chemical' version.

But now it is about getting the real story up so that she will not have to let herself be cheated by the nazis such as I had to allow for in my childhood. It would be wrong to put the role of Odda wonderchild on her.

She was born in Osaka, Japan. That means that the reason (norwegian 'osaka' or 'årsaken') why Celan was in Odda, as he probably also told me, was that it was the french president who had told him that he had a son in Odda who was me. And he probably was right. That is me as the 'golden light over the water' = 'Charles de Gaulle' who was the source of the information and the logic behind it.

Modern Language Review has 'Ovid, Juvenal, and 'the silent woman': A reconsideration. By John Fern' on the front page of April 1970. Although that can be read 'it was nale-vuj and the endless man-ow etc', there is also the inherent story of Celan calling by telephone before the meeting (which he probably did not, but the idea could be there nevertheless - for example in the sense of an 'inner telephone') - asking for permission from 'the silent woman' with the 're-consideration' to meet the child outside. Or simply calling to me via the 'inner telephone' to say that I should go out. One may have concluded that there was a look in through the window and later Ragna Gröver looked out the same window and saw us. This could have been interpreted as a 'ring'. Could be that is the reason why the woman is 'silent'? The 're-consideration' would have been from 'in-glan': The January 1961 issue contains the morph PAN which is the title of Hamsun's book about lieutenant 'Glahn' = 'Celan'. The word 'glan' means a gaze, a look, like this 'in-glan' through the window. Hence the 'call for a ring' could be about 'England'.

It may be important to stop any theatre which assigns political roles to Midori as the wonderchild outside the house in Odda and things like that. But I cannot tell her so, if the world is investing all its efforts into convincing her of the opposite and assigning to me the role of Celan instead of myself - and I really want to be myself: I am not trying to 'take her place'.

It is important to understand the history and the current situation, but to dress up in roles is not the thing. Cp. the 'Richard Role of Hampole' (MLR) as the 'Beer Hall Putsch'. And that 'beer hall' was perhaps Laura Devold and the putsch was Aron Eidsvig (Adolf Hitler in disguise) relative to her husband Bjarne Eidsvig. I don't know if Laura was in bed with Aron - or was it about his 'fatal curiosity' along with Erich Ludendorf in the 'Feldherrnhalle' when 'låra was in bad with Iron[y]' = 'på jarne[t]' = 'on the fork' = 'Italian influence on the english court masque' on MLR Oct 1923? This is old and tiresome nazi logic, of course, exactly the thing which it is important to get out of. I feel very uncomfortable in that mythological framework. The construction is, though, probably still politically active and I suppose Midori is not particularly happy about being putsched relative to my book by 'Adolf Hitler' who thereby could combine with Gröver/'Mengele' for the Hitler-Mengele combination which seems to be the background of the 'birthday factor'. But this is likely to be the background of the present situation - and it could have been precisely the reason for the attack on Gaza if that was for british interests - after I had found the secret hebrew key in the relation between TEQ (the part which also applies to Midori's recording) and my book The Dreamer from 1994-95 in november 2008. I did get a pensions payment slip from surprise 'Harstad' in January (after an inquiry of mine was left unanswered) and a woman was murdered outside the Slettaelva school in northern Norway on 23 January, which was before I went to register/deposit my book on 26 January, and I certainly had not let out any information about the work. So it could have been tapped. But then it looks as if Israel thinks of itself as Adolf Hitler - or perhaps simply 'e hu doll married?' Zipping back and forth between Aron and Bjarne is perhaps a political interpretation of the diplomatic solution inherent in Midori's role. But one can hardly think of this Gaza story as anything but agency for England if that was the background for the attack.

Conclusion on Gaza: If 'Cast lead' means 'castrate' in the sense of 'scrot-um' = 'mess-around' (I suppose folk imagination normally thinks the scrotum on, but then again there is an L/R mix so maybe it is not), and when the discovery of mine in november 2008 is about that parallel hebrew text which also applies to book 16 in TEQ with another parallel in Midori's music, the purpose with the attack on Gaza could even have been to make for the formula "don't mess around with my girl" - as articulated in many places due to this injustice against the palestinians. Then people speak the language of those who made this construction.

Bertolucci's film of 2003 was called 'The Dreamers'. The opening scenes could be recognized in the opening lines of my book. One could believe that the film is about me and the two Kennedy children (Caroline and John), in which case 'my girl' could mean a conventionally genetic relation. Eva Green thereafter played in a James Bond film. His '1900' was made some 10 years before Petter Andre Syversen allegedly died on 7 August 1986 in the mid point of the GAS-PAS-GAS construction. If my book manuscript from 1994-95 was used for 11 September 2001 and possibly other cases of terrorism, there may have been buffering strategies on it in case I should try to publish it.

This "don't mess around with my girl" would be in the role of 'Adolf Hitler' who says this to 'Bjarne' - and then it could be about constructing an 'ad-old feetler' for example for the 'Abr-Eham' role on basis of the 800 billion dollars. And nearly everybody agreed that this attack on Gaza looked horrendously unfair and wrong. La Repubblica wrote the morning after the election that the state of Israel was without a government. I notice that there were some traces of the 'granny Smith' mysticism in JFK jr's last issue of his magazine 'George'. However, one notices also that Clinton's presidency in the White House probably is an or the important or only reason for his wife Clinton as secretary of state today. Bollack had just given the receiver ('röret', as it is called in norwegian) to his wife when my voice talked in there in the receiver.

But if this is the story, then there is very little more needed for the definite conclusion that Israel attacked Gaza on behalf of the UK/US nazi interests: Some fingersnapping in London, and out goes the israeli army for attacking the poor neighbouring palestinians - in order to make it look unjust and unfair and on the brink of closing of the state of Israel and for promoting the interests of Adolf Hitler. Then the last thing the diaspora should do was to listen to the state of Israel. The situation in the library in Athens seemed to be about Laura Devold eating - as if they sent their letter of thanks to somebody else (to Adolf Hitler, that would mean). That would be the most incredible sort of misunderstanding: They invest their future in Adolf Hitler - he was a powerful man and they could perhaps find more 'security' there than elsewhere. But it was not so smart the last time they tried that solution. But of course the museum in Athens could be run by agents. The story may well end in renewed antisemitism - such as this attack on Gaza is likely to create.

My attempts to get in contact with Jews have generally failed.

Isn't there anybody who sees the horrendously crazy dimensions in this story - the biggest states in the world are involved in a ridiculous theatre around my person - and nobody helps me with explaining for the people of the world what this really is - and I have to explain it myself in order for people to understand it - but who would listen to me under such circumstances? Could be somebody does help me but I am not informed about it. Such gigantic smear campaigns as this latest one with Gaza seems to be is of course very unfortunate for my social interface, if it can be repaired at all, after 15 years of work with the matter. These things must be pronounced clearly - one cannot leave it to me to tidy up after the political intrigue-makers. If the attack on Lebanon in 2006 was because I tried to get in some contact with some Jews in Vienna, somebody else must tell it to them! This even seems to include the 'intrigue' on USA of 11 September 2001. Perhaps somebody could assist in fuelling the sending of the receipt?

In a healthy society, people are credited when they bring something valuable to the society. If the only response to valuable work is an attempt to hijack it and put the creator of the work on a second place, there will not be much more of the same kind. The work of mine which seems to have been attacked by way of Israel's military in Gaza is something I have been working with for at least 15 years - in fact for the sake of the jewish interests. But maybe it is not really about jewish but rather poetic interests.

My view is that one should not permit the attack on USA of 11 September 2001 'even if' (!) it should have been Bill Clinton who organized it. The US democrat party does not have to be outlawed even if a part of the party should be. Could be that is why the republicans are waiting for the democrats to tidy up - in order to avoid a condition of 'civil war' with the currently biggest US party outlawed. But for every day which passes it becomes more and more difficult to come around with such an explanation later. And the attack on Gaza could have been for precisely the purpose of stating the view that this civil war would not be considered a local US matter but could spread to the rest of the world. But that is only because nobody says anything and people are left as helpless victims of political intrigues brimming over with ambiguities in their search for some solid ground to base their opinions on. Most people probably take the silence from the republican party as evidence that the democrat party was not involved - and that is when the blame eventually can come to land on themselves.

In the worst case for me, the plan could be to turn the roles of the 'madness' by turning the roles of the authorship: "Don't mess around with my girl" could then mean that Clinton or Kennedys or other democrats consider this 'girl' (the manuscript and discovery of november 2008) for their own and not mine in terms of the Eidsvig myths. And then the role-turning could be about who's the madman. If Clinton was involved in the attack on USA 11 September 2001, that could qualify for such a diagnosis - but I was not involved and I do not want to exchange roles with him.

The 'Beer Hall Putsch' in Modern Language Review

The October 1923 contents of articles in Modern Language Review:

1. The middle english prose psalter of Richard Rolle of Hampole, III. By Dorothy Everett.
2. Italian influence on the english court masque. By Enid Welsford.
3. John Donne and Sir Thomas Overbury's characters. By Evelyn M.Simpson.
4. Andrew Marvell: Further biographical points. By Pierre Legouis.
5. Les deux demoiselles Maitteland. By Ruth Clark.
6. The adventure of 'Le cerf au pied blanc' in spanish and elsewhere. By William J.Entwistle.
7. Karl Philipp Moritz' 'Blunt' and Lillo's 'Fatal curiosity'. By Francis E.Sandbach.
8. The genesis of Wagner's drama 'Tannhäuser'. By J.G.Robertson.

The putsch was conducted by Adolf Hitler and Erich Ludendorff starting in the Münchener Feldherrnhalle, which is title #1:

Münchener Feldherrnhalle
Middlenglish prose psalter

of Rolle Richard
a dol fitler

'Dorothy Everett' = 'Laura Devold'?
'middle english prose psalter' = 'knee-salter' = 'knis[e]alder', a very young girl/woman
er i knisalderen = erich ludendorff
'Enid Welsford' = erich elsewhere = Erich Ludendorff?
'John Donne' = 'John Gorvin' (from Moscow January 1923) = 'London' John Grover
'Sir Thomas Overbury' = Edward Frick = ed w eard frisk, together with Gorvin and Nansen
'Andrew Marvell' = 'Fridtjof Nansen': Nansen and Gorvin and Frick were in Moscow one year exactly before the death of Lenin for talks with Kalinin and Trotskij
'Les deux demoiselles' = Asha and Laura?
'Maitteland. By Ruth Clark' = 'Quisling. By two mart[yrs]'? Probably a trick - taken over into the 'kitchen tap' program - for pretending that Stalin did not know about this in advance, which could mean that Stalin was an agent for England all the time
'Le cerf au pied blanc' in spanish = a deer white-feetler with spanish hopping
William J.Entwistle = william 'gents' no playground = Erich Ludendorf, er ich Tintore-tto = the copy of the Tintoretto in San Trovaso, of Jesus washing the feet = the ad-ol 'feetler'.

Article 7 can mean Moritz Hartmann: 'Adam und Eva', but here in the sense that they 'shot themselves': Adam was blunted and Eva had made a fatal error with the 'lillo' - if it is not about the famous taxman story from that idyll of Hartmann. By Francis E. Sandbach = some french connection which recommended that the bodies of the two alleged assassins (left behind while the two fled) were returned to Paris. Although this story could be unlikely, it could still protect Stalin.

Richard Rolle of Hampole = ride kettle of Eham-pole = beer hall putsch
III = 'en tredelt skau', Ehamgasse divided in 3, 3 Skau Jabobsen brothers: Ole, Petter, Lars
Hence Eham = Abr-Eham = ad-old feetler
Han ga röret til sin kone = he gave the receiver/tube to his wife
Han Gard öret ils ink one = he Gard the-ear ils ink one
Ehamgasse Re: Hils Tintoretto = Erich Ludendorf etc Beer Hall Putsch

This could explain the Kran and the phenomenon of the two a hundred years ago. And simply the January 2009 issue of Modern Language Review? Greetings to Tintoretto? I hope it is not me who is targeted on the front page this time. I happened to come across an old newspiece from 12-12-2001 (Hindustan Times) that a US bomber of type B-1 had crashed into the Indian Ocean a few kilometres north of 'Diego Garcia', which could be simply 'die-Gog[h]-Gard-a' = 'a Gard öret til sin kone'. Cp. also 'Gard-ö-mo[r]en' airport at Oslo, about the distance north of Oslo as the aircrash was north of Diego Garcia. And "Jean-Baptiste Chassignet's debt to Diego de Estella. By Catherine Grisé" on MLR for October 1977, apparently about Rekustad and the kitchen tap there. Looks like John Bjarne Grover's debt to Gardermoen, Oslo, or something like that - or even 'the one who gave his tube to his wife'. Would that be Clinton? Such an old coincidental newspiece a this from 2001 which could be about me or things connected with me could be telling of the 'Abr-Eham' monster. The date probably means that the last digit or letter is supposed to be moved forwards to the front - which even could be about my diary novel from 1994-95. Here is the beginning lines of the excerpt from the novel written on 11 September 1994:

11.9.94: I am constantly planning to round off these notes, and then there is some coincidence which I just cannot help recording. I noticed that some of the 666-occurrences yesterday had been adjacent to 3-digits, and then the series stopped. The car in the University street had number DE 18666, and the one in Rosenkrantz street had number DD 86661, as if the first digit had been transposed onto the last position. This suddenly makes me recall that the friend I met in Ruseløkka street and talked with, mentioned something very similar. He is an artist, and has been living as a freelance artist for some time, but now he told me that he was hired as a teacher in drawing at the Architect highschool. He made a point out of the salary, which was unusually large compared to what he was used to as an artist, and he made a joke in the following form: "The salary per hour is zero more than ordinary payment - and then the zero is on the right side of the number", and then he laughed. The point being that, say, if 70 is an ordinary salary, then he would get 700 (and not 070). As he said it, he made a movement with his index finger as to describe the transposition of the zero in the air, from the beginning to the end of the number, to have it on the right side of the number. This is, I now suddenly realize, exactly as these two numbers.

This tells that it is very likely that the book has been - and maybe still is - heavily abused for the 11 September 2001 terror program, which seems to have indexed just that 'birthday' with balloons and funhattans. I think I got the first pension payment exactly one year after this aircrash in the Indian Ocean, and then the idea of a 'salary joke' could perhaps be not so funny. I notice the underscored line in the book found on Celan's desk after his disappearance. This newspiece I found totally coincidenally when I searched for something else and it is probably not so special. Could be news is very much about this 'monster' already and that 800 billion dollars is about the sum which would be reasonable for an economic compensation. But that only means that if it be about a debt of "Jean-Baptiste Chassignet" to "Diego de Estella. By Catherine Grisé" (October 1977), then the roles are turned around - even on a scale of 800 billion dollars! Bill 800-dollars! This 'salary joke' - almost as funny as the one about he who 'ate Eve' - could of course also be about the phenomenon of my pension never coming close to anything like the cost of that airplane. But this suggests that it could be about Clinton being in the role of the 'virtual being' of Ehamgasse. It could apparently be a part of this story that he gave the tube/receiver to his wife. But if this means that Clinton[s] were behind the attack on 11 September 2001, then it should be up to the US democratic party to tidy up in it.

A non-11/9-2001 pretext for having arranged an aircrash in the Indian Ocean could of course have been Dorothy Everett = Laura Devold on Lenin's 'datcha'. I hope that is not MLR for Jan 2009 for the concept of 'after-fart'.

Eham-jule[t] could be the periodical Modern Language Review. There was this idea arising in my mind when I lived in Ehamgasse that the political plans for a future 'black sea loop' is to print in advance in the newspapers the names and addresses of those who are to be taken by Dr.Verboten and the neighbours will only stand there watching when they are dragged out and driven off in the ambulance. Click here for an ad campaign in Vienna in 2007, I think it was, on the background of the pattern which used to be on my JVC computer screen in blue, not in red. I hope the plan is not to tap my computer and interpret my writings there as a way of indexing targets of the attacks from Verboten and announce the names in advance - 'Modern Language Review' style - in entertainment and various media. Talkshow with names in the undertext and things like that. The keyboard-typing could then have been made by the 'monster' called 'Abr-Eham' - a virtual being whose political role and power is getting more and impressive. An alien from a distant galaxy! Do you believe in 'the invisible world'? This enormously tragic misunderstanding is what the name of the chinese leader could be telling about: HU = WHO is precisely the issue if e.g. Midori's playing is telling of what happened in the meeting in 1960, but not in the nazi sense of it. Impact on the physiognomy and the movements of the body is the theme since nazism started and british logic started to claim that administrative logic is the new form of 'poetic logic' and that administration can make a weak chin where the genetics does not - that is the 'hakekors' = 'chin-cross' = 'swastika'. That would also be the purpose with Abr-Eham as an administrative being. WHO as the centre of Dr.Verboten is the grandiose misunderstanding of 'das britte Reich' = 'da spritze Reich' (the reason for the outlines of the borders of Austria after WWI). The media tell that Dr.Verboten is the near-nude female doctor who undertakes a medical examination of the body and investigates the strange swelling down there and tries to assist in getting it down again. Many people could vote for such politicies. But that is not what Dr.Verboten is about: It is so very to the contrary as it can be - it is about the worst form of torture - with 'balloon' chemicals ('endless psalter'?) in the blood, if modern science has not taken it much further - for the aim of squeezing the spirit out of people and over onto those who arrange the torture, for lending 'galla' sprudelwasser feel to the performance. But of course it really is for scaring the substances out of people - the proletariat, as Marx would have called it - so that they do not protest against the power abuse and exploitation of the masses who are not informed about the details in the construction of the mythology. If even socalled 'socialists' and 'democrats' seem to endorse such verboten methods as a part of the 'class struggle', that is when the british diagonal-replacement farce has gone too far. Is this the dream of british administration? If 'Modern Language Review' is taken to be the archetypal 'wheel of history', then there is an urgent need for a better wheel. I do not experience the Moulin Rouge wheel in Luhrmann's film in that way, as a black sea loop wheel, but maybe I am still too young and inexperienced and naive. I still have this naive belief that if there is beauty in something, it cannot really be evil (but then of course beauty can be defined in various ways). It is not that there is a wheel in a film - a pretty wheel it is with its slow rotation and squaking sounds - it is about which way the development goes - the wheel is of course an age-old symbol and certainly not for any Dr.Verboten. It was in probably July 1981 that I had been with Anne Abercrombie to visit her father Keith Abercrombie in Lariano outside Rome and we drove back in the car (a sort of Topolino or the Fiat-level above) of Hiliry Harvey whom I had met in the Trastevere restaurant where she was singing. I was driving and she may have felt that I had not complete control with the car - there was a series of curves in the downhill road - perhaps not as bad as the boustrophedon in a 'sonnet algorithm' for example as an interpretation of the ceiling in San Pantalon, but some 'boustrophedon' it may have been - and should I use the brake or the clutch [not the 'dutch']? 'Ba slurmann' could have been a shorthand formula for the situation if it is Anne Abercrombie talking. Could be Baz Luhrmann is an artist name or these are just the normal coincidences. But of course it could be that Luhrmann shares such interests even because of his name. 'Han ga röret til sin kone' can perhaps also mean 'fylleröre'. Fjellheim put a hand on Grue's arm on 'Club 7' in 1982 (cp. Grue-Cleb7 = Gruppe Elg = Magne Rudjord, Petter Brönn, Morten Juvet = 'Manchmal wird dieser genius dunkel und versinkt in den bitteren Brunnen seines Herzens', the underscored line left on the desk after Celan - as if the group should have been formed as a link between this line in the book of 1970 and this comment of 1982) and said: "Ligg unna kameraten min" = 'stay away from my comrade'. There was some 'fylleröre' with a tape recording in Fjellheim's home in probably the same year, with some talk about 'cattle' or 'kettle'.

But, on the other hand, the name of a film-maker can be highly to the point of my memories without being related to me. It think it was on Arnardo's circus in my childhood that I saw a performance with a man throwing knives and axes towards a lightly dressed female target standing in front of a wall - the ironware was slamming into the wall between arms and legs and trunk of her body and swishing around her ears. He even put a scarf around his eyes and continued the game. I didn't like it. But clearly this is not about the art of Mario Luzi.

There is little post in my postbox. Could be this is due to a tragic nazi project on me - for the idea that only letters which are about money = 'Gori' reach me, hence 'Gori', my childhood fantasy friend probably after the meeting with Celan in 1960, would be conceived of as the Ehamgasse monster. There exists, as far a I know, a german preacher with much public appeal called 'Reinhard Bonke' (or was it 'Bonnke') or something like that. 'Beinhard ronke' = 'bone-hard masturbation', while the corresponding spoon (by 'swapping letters') on 'Reinhard Heydrich' (the reference in 'Aktion Reinhard', the biggest extermination program against Jews during the holocaust, including Sobibor, Treblinka, Belzec, and with apparent reference to 'Eidsvig Ragna' - the program was led by Odilo Globocnik from the area not far from Duino) leaves a 'Heine-heart read-r-ich' = 'Heine-heart read-I-not'. Cp. also Oslo Report #6 'Rechlin' and 'Duino' at the 'Adriatersee' = 'Mueritzsee' and 'redr-lin' = 'redr-Lund' = 'redr-Grove', which means that if I = 'Grover' send a letter = 'brev', there is the 'brev-bonke' = 'heap of letters' which means a grammatical plural of the singular. Could be it means 'categorial' and could be it even refers to the connection between Sachs and me. From 'Modern Language Review' for April 1970, it appears that Sachs had sent a letter to me - which did not reach me - unless of course it was there in the home of Gröver/'Mengele' all the time but not for me to touch. (There was also this letter from the man in northern Norway who asked for permission to change his name). Ragna Gröver would probably relate categorially to me relative to Sachs as far as the concept of 'mother' is concerned - and if 'Aktion Reinhard' really indexed her, there are some potential vibrations there. If there are reasons for an associative link of whatever kind (I would doubt that it could be the same man) between e.g. dr.Hage in the curve at the lower end of Labråten and this 'Reinhard Heydrich', then one could also spot a link between the name of his son 'Bernt Hage' = 'bent chin/garden', which could be about my 'swastika chin' - there are traces of the curve of Sachs' chin in mine, and one notices the 'Kommode' = 'chest of drawers' ('chest-i-kassen') at the end of 'Der Meridian', which could be about the 'inner telephone' when Celan arrived to the house in Odda, the level of inner signals transmitted between humans - and the letters from Ragna Gröver which were such unpleasant discoveries in the mailbox. 'La braaten' could mean 'let the fire take it'. For which reason one could wonder what feelings arrive in the other end if I send a letter. For example in order to make some Jews aware of the story and the importance of knowing about it. 'But if that doesn't lead to anything, why don't you try to contact them in the street, for example'? I cannot take up contact with people if they start getting aggressive due to the feelings which these political intrigues on my person could invoke. I cannot be more hero for the jews and they are not able to understand those mechanisms. Which means that somebody else must make them aware of these URLs of mine, for example.

I hope my book is not subjected to such 'verboten' interpretation while I am waiting for having the 'receipt' in the post. I hope 'he' did not give the receipt[er] to his wife. But if that is the logic, it could be of the same kind as that 'Bill 800-dollar' joke for turning the roles around. 'Anton Weiss' was chief of the austrian post, at least formerly. I don't know who is there now, but if the chief is the same as before, there is the element of 'an come wife' ('he came wife') for the idea 'he gave the receiver to his wife'. But then it is about the wife of Clinton. And then the reason is likely to be that precisely this manuscript has been badly abused - apparently by the same Clintons. Then one would have to wonder if there is a sort of link between the humourous 'kitchen tap' and this 'chief of the post'. If it does not arrive, then one must probably quite simply conclude that it has been stolen, and then there must be some interests behind such a case of theft. I did get the receipt for my 16th book of TEQ which I delivered to the register at the same time as 'The Dreamer', which means that if this should be about 'swapping letters', it could possibly entail an inherent reference to the zipping between Aron and Bjarne Eidsvig. If 'kneecaps' and 'knisealder' is the reference, it could even be about the balkan cancan connection between Serbia and Greece, which means Macedonia. And 'bone-hard' it could be if it be about a sort of wooden leg, the cup for it. 'Lår-halsen' is the upper part of the femur thigh-bone where the ball-joint to the hip is, the other side of that c[o]up, cp. 'Dorothy Everett' vs. 'Laura Devold'. There could be a certain link to the bombing of Lebanon 2006 and the aircrash of 12-12-2001. Could be 'lapping sweaters' could be about those 'icelander' sweaters of Ole Devold's factory: Iceland went bankrupt some time ago, during that 800 billion dollar bailout period of crisis. There is a certain similarity of name with Israel.

Ted Hughes published the collection 'By heart' in 1997. It is a collection of british poetry which the readers were encouraged to learn by heart. A 'Rein-heart Bonke' = a 'pure-heart stack' of poetry.

Conclusion: There are reasons - discussed above - to believe that it was Clinton who organized the attack on USA 11 September 2001 on basis of the manuscript stolen from my computer - and this would also likely be the same reasons why his wife (not to be mixed up with my concept of 'the american girl', cp. also 'klump-i-[lår]-halsen' statue-of-liberty and the King Kong myth / Ehamgasse) currently is US secretary of state - and that is thereby also likely to be the reason for the delay of the receipt to me for the deposit of the same manuscript now in 2009.

The british magazine called 'Modern Language Review' seems to be a horrendous scandal - which even has been running for 100 years. It has very much value as historic evidence, though, and it seems that one can take e.g. its April 1970 as a national british responsibility claim on the death of Sachs and Celan. It spans the time from one Visthouse to the next. One should, on basis of the evidence there, probably conclude that the Nürnberg sentences against the german government under Hitler also should apply equally to the british government, although I am no expert in law and cannot have much opinion on that.

23 February: The receipt has not yet arrived and I think USA should find another secretary of state. The Columbia Pictures logo resembles Clinton with graffiti spray in the sky - like the Challenger disaster ('he gave it to his wife'? - or who gave it to his wife?) - which could be for the concept of Columbia University where Eisenhower was president before he made his doctrine. The Columbia Pictures logo shows a 'Heinrich Himmler' posture. But that is only via me and my mythological role as 'San Pantalon' - and that could well be the reason for this story with the missing receipt. (Keith Abercrombie, who seems to be the background name of the Eisenhower doctrine, is the alternative name over the door in San Pantalon, with the alternative interpretation 'Heinrich Himmler'). Then the current US secretary of state appears like a walking ad for a new holocaust - with 'balloons' and 'funhattans'. One notices also the Columbia space shuttle disaster on 1.2.3 - shipwrecking on its way down where the Challenger exploded on its way up, with same number of crew. The way up and the way down could have been planned ever since the 3-2-1 of 1980-81, ending with the attempt on the pope in 1981. The two space shuttle disasters make for a 'walking ad[d]' form which can be recognized as 'da spritze Reich' of Austria after WWI, flanked by Slovakia and Slovenia and with the former 'double-monarchic' Hungary inbetween. Then one wonders what it was that he gave to 'his' (his own? the other person's?) wife - when it is about a 'tube'. Could it be about a 'spritze Reich' - as a variant of the old 'onr-ovr' theme? If Hilary Clinton is that 'walking ad', it would confirm the impression that the US democrats - at least on a top level of the party albeit not necessarily on a lower - serves as an extension of the 'britte Reich' of England as taken over from Hitler. It is not the right sort of policy, quite simply. Is it the trick that the 'walking ad' tries to tell the world what the true nature of the Eisenhower doctrine is? And therefore it is a 'Challenger'? Could be, but then the methods for showing this do not invoke confidence. Many pitied those astronauts in the capsule when it disappeared into the universe. And neither is 11 September 2001 - another case of 'da spritze Reich' with balloons and funhattans - the right way of protesting against the 'world trade' which bases its profits on a future exploitation program of a 'verboten' kind.

The graffiti and the university was also present in the story of the graffiti on the campus in Oslo in 1987 on places where I and somebody else had either met or parted. The central graffiti drawing was in the middle of the campus and showed the outlines of a person, of the type one can see in crime series on TV where the body has been on the ground and there is drawn an outline around it, with the word 'ENEMY' under it - cp. 'NMI of the state' which was led by Jostein Simble and who were my connection to the Musikus project led by Ole-Johan Dahl and Arvid Vollsnes - when the graffiti appeared on the campus I was just in the process of being attached to the project. This means 'graffiti' and 'univers[ity]' and 'all over'. Cp. also the Kampusch case in Austria, she was held 'all under' the surface of the earth for many years.

I am particularly concerned with telling that my book - which still is only a manuscript which has reached the depot while I am waiting for the receipt - is not a part of that quasi-protest program kind: When the text under 11.9.94 seems to encode e.g. the aircrash of 12-12-2001 and probably much else, that is because the aircrash modelled my book and not the other way round.

I must have the receipt for the book "The Dreamer" which I registered on 26 January and the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' I paid to ÖVW in 2004 - otherwise the Abr-Eham monster continues its existence. I have spoken with the housing law advice office called 'AK' in Vienna and they confirm that I have the right to get it back - but I don't have the money or chance to take it to court.

One nearly sinks in the earth when one discovers the nazi logic: "He gave the receiver/tube to his wife" can have two meanings in norwegian: "Han ga röret til sin kone" = he gave it to his own wife = 'klump['Columbia']-i-halsen' = Adam's apple = the application, or "han ga röret til hans kone" = he gave it to another's wife (a 'Challenger'?). He gave it to "han sko[e]ne" = to the man with the shoes.

Pants, shoes, he came 'wife'? 'Sko fida' = 'Kommode', 'disappoints-you'? Ole jo Hahn dal? 'The end of love'? Ole Johan Dahl worked with Kristen Nygaard with developing Simula, for which they were credited with the Turing prize and then both of them died after only a few weeks, with 43-44 days interval. 'Jo han er Jean'? 'Anton Weiss' could even be taken to mean a sort of 'shiner' in that Molde painting sense of it. That is when I find it relevant to observe that Jean Bollack gave the receiver to his wife when I called him in the belief that he had been a friend of Celan - no sooner had he understood who he talked with he gave it to his wife. 'Ole jo Handle' could even be that 800-dollar joke.

In short, there are reasons - discussed in this article - to believe that the current US government or at least the current US secretary of state could be planning a new holocaust policy on a basis of 'balloons' and 'funhattans' = 'Verboten' of 11 September 2001. But this would not have been the policy presented to the voters in their program and it is not likely to be the policy the voters have voted for.

Similarly, the fact that the UK publication 'Modern Language Review' is still endorsed by the government seems to be a complete 100-year scandal which means that the british government may be on a similar political line and probably has been for the same period of time.

In short, there are some reasons to believe that a new period of persecutional nazism may be contained in the current UK/US government. It may be important that the people of these countries do what they can to stop it before it starts getting out of democratic control. The fact that the attack on 11 September 2001 seems to have been heralded in advance in 'Modern Language Review' suggests that the day may be a signal for a policy of 'da spritze Reich' which even the british government endorses.

It may be urgently important that all these matters be thoroughly analyzed and discussed and understood by the broad public since the strategy seems to be to gain people's confidence before serving the 'shiner'. That is the concept of 'diagonal replacement' - replacing good with evil and vice versa. This could have been the british strategy since Grassmann 1844 and John Grover 1843 and Boole and Ole Devold 1852. That is when it may be so urgently important to understand today the basis for confidence or not. England seems to have organized the massive protests from the Jews against this strategy via the agent Adolf Hitler as the leader of the 'jewish revolution' 1933-45.

The evidence in Modern Language Review of british involvement in the attack on USA 11/9-2001:

The main articles in the July 2001 issue of Modern Language Review are the following:

1. Falstaff: Subjectivity between the carnival and the aesthetic. By Hugh Grady
2. The 'all-atoning name': The word Patriot in seventeenth-century England. By Ronald Knowles
3. Dead many times: Cathleen ni Houlihan, Yeats, Two old women, and a Vampire. By Henry Merritt
4. 'Speak again': The politics of rewriting in A thousand acres. By David Brauner
5. Divorce and political scandal in Edouard Rod's Michel Teissier Novels. By Nicholas White
6. Autodidactism and criminality in Jean-Paul Sartre's La Nausée and Edith Thomas's L'Homme criminel. By Angelaw Kershaw
7. Alimentary metaphors in Dante's Paradiso. By David Gibbons
8. Quintilla usage in Antonio Enriquez Gómez: More evidence against his authorship of the second part of La Hija del Aire. By John B. Wooldridge
9. The city of words: Eduoard Mendoza's 'La ciudad de los prodigios'. By Caragh Wells
10. The sincerest form of flattery: A note in Bruce Chatwin's 'The estate of Maximilian Tod' as an imitation of Borges. By Iain A.D.Stewart
11. Politics and the Playwright: J.M.R.Lenz and 'Die Soldaten'. By James Gibbons
12. Tieck's Juvenilia: Ossianic Attributions. By Howard Gaskill
13. Marina Tsvetaeva: The concrete and the metaphoric discourse of exile. By Ute Stock

I here discuss the most important associations I can make to these titles for the time being:

1. Falstaff: Subjectivity between the carnival and the aesthetic - suggests that autopilots ('fal[se]-staff) could have been baked into ('Bakhtin') the airplane system. Which means that the authors to the attack were the ones who programmed the autopilots. The article is written by a 'Hugh Grady' which could mean a 'doctorate degree' - which I did not get in 1998. Cp. the below on the hand that held the laser. If the 'Hugh Grady' is the biggest doctorate, it means WHO. Gro Harlem Brundtland was chief of WHO at that time.

2. The 'all-atoning name': The word 'Patriot' in seventeenth-century England - could be about the name of Tony Blair. The world really should think better, can be the conclusion, when nobody so far has told me what could be the reason for this word 'Patriot' here if it is about me. Is it about 'Mengele's remote control'? I am not informed about these medical myths or rumours or facts and do not come out with my details before I have a reason for it. I was born on 29 June 1957 and was in hospital in 1975 - probably both before and after my 18th birthday, but the operation with GAS anaesthesia was probably in the autumn. There was some operation without GAS, though, probably before (in a private basement with a doctor in Oslo who tried in vain to open an abscess in my throat and it took some time before he had to realize that he had to give it up).

3. Dead many times: Cathleen ni Houlihan, Yeats, Two old women, and a Vampire. By Henry Merritt - the alarm has gone so many times that people do not care to take it seriously this time = 'ulv ulv' = 'vulva'. 'Naa er det jul igjen' - 'og jula varer helt til paaske [crucifixion]' - the norwegian election to Storting = Stonehenge in the evening 10 September 2001. Christmas was typically 'Bayonne ham' in Labråten and it probably mean 'John B.Gröver' - here it could be about Ehamgasse and the 'crucifixion' in terms of my book 'Hammerfest'. "Yeats, Two old women, and a Vampire" could be the four elements in the attack: Lambertsville, Manhattan and Pentagon - or swapped Pentagon = Yeats taking the pan, Vampire = Lambertsville, hence phonological and not semantic, which means an FFT butterfly. Merritt-liste? It was the danish politician Ritt Bjerregaard who suggested that one would have to come to a point where one had to consider the need one had for older people - something like that, I don't remember the details. Hence the lists of targets of persecution by Verboten. Would those lists be based on the hands that wrote the authorship? For dumping the blame on me and taking the political profit of the terror?

4. 'Speak again': The politics of rewriting in A thousand acres. By David Brauner - if this should mean the chief of the norwegian documentation project Christian Emil Ore, then it could mean 'Chr.Emil ore' = Chervil-ordet = 'dr.Evil' = 'dr.Verboten'. Balloons and Funhattans. Also, 'auto-U-send-cars' = the philosophical 'auto pilot' who guides cars around town and therefore sends a 666 or 777 to where I was when writing my diary 1994-95. The norwegian research council used to be in Sandakerveien 99 (I think it was) before they moved to St.Hanshaugen - which means that Sandakerveien could mean 'Nilserudkleiva' in my book. There was the mention on the date 11/9-94 of a car number DD 77766 in a nearby street, cp. the date 22/11-99 when I was brought to the psychiatric hospital. Spikeren = the spike, the nail, the speaker - the inner voice which dictates from the nazi headquarter like an auto pilot guiding the pen of the poet - in short, Hörbiger. - 'Speak again', I cannot hear you. - Then 'Hör bigger'.

5. Divorce and political scandal in Edouard Rod's Michel Teissier Novels. By Nicholas White - the paper 'Brauner' writes on could then be 'fru Ore' = 'furore'. Would that mean that 'han ga röret til sin kone?' But if this is divorce and other-way-round, and if Michel = Giambono, then it could even be about the opposite of 'Frau [g]Röver'. 'Nicholas' = 'Nidrolas' = 'Nidaros-domen' - suggesting Dommesgasse ('Nicholas Weisse') intersecting with Ehamgasse at the house where I lived i Vienna.

6. Autodidactism and criminality in Jean-Paul Sartre's La Nausée and Edith Thomas's L'Homme criminel. By Angelaw Kershaw - the use of my manuscript with car numbers (angel of car-show, as if the cars had been directed around by a secret liga) stolen on 22/11-99. Jean Paul Sartre = John Bjarne Grover, the norseman, with Ronk Röver = autodidactism and criminality = british origin, hence 'criminality' as another word for 'intellectualism'. Edit Thomas is who? An edited version? Or the editor of The Times? Could be this entry is meant to indicate the date 11/9-2001. Could be that even was the purpose with the burglary on 22/11-99.

7. Alimentary metaphors in Dante's Paradiso. By David Gibbons = the banana, the king's diss-is and 66680 mentioned in my diary novel of 11 September 1994. Nel mezzo del cammin di nostra vita. The love that moves the 'son' and all the stars.

8. Quintilla usage in Antonio Enriquez Gómez: More evidence against his authorship of the second part of La Hija del Aire. By John B. Wooldridge - Could be about the chinchillas of Bjarne Eidsvig, the 'swastika chin' which the nazis had planned to constitute a claim that I was not in total control of my own authorship. 'Quinn Robert Martinez' was an important name in my application to IRCAM in 2002, but I had written about this case of Martinez on my computer and in 'papers' before 2001. I had to speculate, on basis of the high level of precision in the name and the fact that the news had taken any sort of interest in the story, whether there could have been an element of planning in it, but I suppose there was not. Could be there could be plans of editing the manuscript as well. There was this deleted part of the manuscript around the first mention of 'Granny Smith'. 'La Hija del Aire' could even be about the mid point of the flight from London to Bergen when I went to deliver my PhD dissertation to the university and the pilot said unmotivatedly over the loudspeakers: "Take a seat, Carrington". Most likely, though, 'La Hija del Aire' could be the grand Izmit earthquake of Turkey one month exactly after the last takeoff of JFK jr. 'John B.Wooldridge' could be about the earplugs which symbolize the cork in the behind. What is 'Antonio Enriquez Gómez' about in this story? Anton Weiss? Or 'Togtidende' author 'Aslak Skabbigamma' - with the 'holy mess'?

9. The city of words: Eduoardo Mendoza's 'La ciudad de los prodigios'. By Caragh Wells - could be 'Osaka, Japan' for the concept of 'don't mess around with my girl' possibly lifted over to the Club 7 = Caragh Wells environments of Oslo = Mendoza. Hence it could mean 'change of gender'. Frau Röver etc?

10. The sincerest form of flattery: A note in Bruce Chatwin's 'The estate of Maximilian Tod' as an imitation of Borges. By Iain A.D.Stewart - or are there plans for an imitation of my book? Bruce Chatwin = Bill Clinton who had office in one of the twin towers on Manhattan in 2001. His name resembles 'Bil Nummer' = 'Car Number' which could be considered an 'imitation' of my book. I think it was Jens Stoltenberg (cp. 'Iain A.D.Stewart') who was 'in office' in Norway in 2001 - but this was the day of the election there. 'Flattery' could perhaps be about 'punga' = 'tyre deflated' as well as 'paid' = 'punga ut'. 'Pung' can also mean 'scrotum' = 'mess-around'. I notice the 100.000 NOK offered on Clinton's inauguration day in 1993.

11. Politics and the Playwright: J.M.R.Lenz and 'Die Soldaten'. By James Gibbons - this is the second 'Gibbons' in this issue. Was it AP = Labour who won the election? If this is about the National Theatre, there is the story with Stig Johansson who came three times on the same place when I stepped out of the underground station there. It is called 'Tordenskiolds soldater', the same few people popping up around in all sorts of positions. I think Tordenskiold let his few soldiers walk in a ring which was exposed in only a small part (Lenz?) and hence the enemy army believed that there were thousands of them. (This was the same place where I had earlier met Henning Lönn with redhair). There are some allusions to Stig Johanson in my diary novel from 1994. If this is 'The National Theatre', it could even be about the idea of a coup. Tordenskiold = 'thunder-shield', cp. the shield of Giambono. There is or was a Keith Vaz in the british government, one Kees Vaes in John Benjamins when my 'Submorphemic signification' was rejected, and maybe there is a third of these Tordenskiold's soldiers around somewhere. Frau g-Röver?

12. Tieck's Juvenilia: Ossianic Attributions. By Howard Gaskill - "You ved Nilen, ja" - I wrote my first poem in Rome in 1981, that is right, and I had written prose since about 1973. But to attribute my writings to 'Ossian' is not right. There has been a series of 'Ocean' films from Hollywood - about a successful coup, I think it was, I think I saw one 'Ocean 11' or something like that, since something told me that it was important to see it. A 'sheriff' is a sort of police. Wasn't there a sheriff or vice sheriff who went amok at 09:52 Vienna time in late 2007 and shot a pizza party with young folks which seemed to represent my home environments in Vienna? My first poem on the verandah in Rome was about the swan and the word of God - but I don't have the original. Could be somebody else has it. Or is it about 'Howard Gaskill' = 'The road to Swann' = 'Du côté de chez Swann' = the first part of Proust's long work, corresponding to my 'Hammerfest' which seems to have been abused by US film-making ('American Beauty'), for example, and it can be recognized also in the environments of my home in Ehamgasse 23 2005-2008 - that is the environments which seemed to be indexed also in the massacre on the youths in USA in late 2007. Hence 'Howard Gaskill' could mean 'Hammerfest' and the US abuse of this first poetry book of mine - corresponding to the first poem I wrote in 1981. (There were also the two letters to local newspaper I wrote along with two friends in 1973 or thereabout - one from 'Egvar Ruge' and one from 'Staale Sponhaug' = pseudonymic). 'Tid er sju Venezia' = 'Petter Andre Syversen' = PAS in the Tiepolo in Chiesa SS.XXI Apostoli.

13. Marina Tsvetaeva: The concrete and the metaphoric discourse of exile. By Ute Stock - Ut Stock / Auto Pilot. 1 = plural, 13 = plural. I was in Sandviken Psychiatric Hospital in 1999-2000, at the time when Aung San Suu Kyi underwent an operation in her abdomen, according to the newspapers. The similarity of her name with the name of the hospital could be a possible reference. I wrote something about it somewhere - an email or maybe only an email to myself. 'Marina Tsvetaeva' could mean 'henge seg opp i detaljer' = 'to be over-concerned with details', 'to pull oneself up in those pulleys': She could not have done that herself. Similarly, I could not have made a 'third eye' with laser on myself - I suppose the tool will get out of control as soon as one starts, or it is not possible to do that on oneself. Which means that if the nazis plan to claim that the poetry was written by the 'author' of the 'third eye', the one who held the laser, it could not have been me. Would it have been the plan of the nazis that the hand who held the laser also programmed the auto-pilots? Was the secret reason for the hospitalization (I never got the reason and inquired much about it) that I had a 'third eye' mutilation in my cortex - and therefore would likely have developed schizophrenia, according to the article which could be a case of british scholarship? I don't know, but that is of course possible. Hence it could be the plan of the nazis to claim that I could not have done this work myself, since they can refer to a diagnosis and perhaps even medical observations by medical authorities in the hospital. Which of course would be false allegations: Of course it is I myself who have written this work alone and it can even be proven. 'Geirr Tveitt' without 'cortex' = without 'Kurt Köck'? Rein-hard bonke? If the author name means 'ute-rus', it is a singular relative to the plural of 'ute-stock', in which case there is both a reference to the plural of doctorates in WHO in 1) as well as a norwegian form 'vis entall' = 'show the singular', hence 'Simon Wiesenthal' or simply 'Josef Stalin'.

The conclusion to all this is that it seems to be Clinton in extension from the national british responsibility claim in Modern Language Review who arranged the attack on USA on 11 September 2001 for the purposes of a verboten program, and it even seems that an essential part of it is my novel 'The Dreamer' from 1994-95 which had been partly edited (around the mention of 'Granny Smith') by some intruder, partly it could have been stolen on 22/11-99. A part of the plan could perhaps even be to claim that I had not written this work (or The Endmorgan Quartet) myself. When I have not yet received the receipt, that certainly could relate to these plans.

I think the 'Modern Language Review' constitutes a body of evidence which suffices for a revised view on England and english policy (I do certainly not want to have my work published in such a country of terror and fraud) and their relations with the US democrat party or rather a part of it. Which means that if there has been a coup in the democrat party, the party must tidy up in this. The series of terror and crimes which this fraction of the party could be involved in seems possibly to be very extensive.

Are there traces of a role of Norway in the story? That could be in terms of a 'Stonehenge' function on 10 September and as the second step in the 1-2-3 ladder to Israel - which could have been the background of the attack on Gaza 2008-2009 (although there could of course have been other reasons - the timing with my discovery of the connections between the two works of mine could not have been predicted in advance - but the absence of the receipt from the registration office in Vienna is alarming). One notices also that Gro Harlem Brundtland (prime minister of Norway 1986-96) was chief of WHO 1998-2003. It also seems from this MLR that Ehamgasse 2005-2008 - for the construction of the financial monster called 'Abr-Eham' - could have been contained as an inherent part of this attack of 2001 - which suggests that it even could be the contents of the US film "American Beauty" and the intrigues which drove me around from place to place untill I had moved in there.

Here is a tentative summary of the 13 titles in MLR July 2001 - I suppose one can take it further but it could give an impression of what it could be about:

1. GHB = chief of WHO = female
2. Tony Blair = chief of England = male
3. Ehamgasse 21, intersecting with Grillgasse
4. Hörbiger factory surveying the street between 3 and 5, producing hydraulic lifts and 'Einspritzen'-products (cp. 'da spritze Reich')
5. Ehamgasse 23, intersecting with Dommesgasse
6. The reason, the cause, årsaka
7. The date 11/9-01
8. Mid way = 1/2, one month, nel mezzo del cammin di nostra vita
9. Change of gender = turning of 1 and 2
10. 100.000 NOK when Bill Clinton took office, paid cash - chemicals?
11. Frau g-Röver, keys vas x 3 = genetic space = surveillance camera monitor
12. Pseudonymic, GAS-PAS-GAS = PASsing from GASse to GASse
13. Aktion Rein-hard, Josef Stalin, Simon Wiesenthal

One observes the mirror symmetry around the date 11/9. There are traces of 'en tredelt skau' = 'a 3-divided forest' in this 3-divided Ehamgasse perhaps corresponding to the three Skau Jakobsen brothers: Ole, Petter Enok (Eisenhower doctrine #7?) and Lars.

The question is whether the plan could be to make an 'ad-old feetler' walk this little street of Ehamgasse every day when growing up (then somebody should tell him in time and warn him against the plans), and later being helped to the position of Führer ruling Europe - without knowing that his ideas and decisions are remote-controlled from the hard and small core of nazis on basis of the surveillance data in Ehamgasse. There could e.g. be abnormal ideas of genetic conditioning of thought etc. - for the general project of replacing genetic conditioning with administrative. The whole life of this Feetler could perhaps be planned to be projected from the walks in this little street. And so forth. Could be it is my few walks in that part which are supposed to form the administrative bridge to the Führer? If the Hörbiger camera is not taken down, one could of course put up information material around in the district from time to time, to make sure that people know about it.

I suggest that the whole project be ended and that I get my Finanzierungsbeitrag and one stops the farce. All this tragic nazi politics has cost me and the world all too much money and time.

Since it appears that the manuscript to my book has been stolen from my computer and been abused for modelling the attack on USA 11 September 2001, it would be no surprise to discover that somebody has registered it for copyright. If England is basing its policy on terror and fraud, and if e.g. 'Tony Blair' is the name in title #2 above, it would perhaps be no surprise to discover that some 'security bureau' or comparable, an agent for politics, could have registered the manuscript for personal copyright in order for the political interesters to be 'personally responsible' for the attack. I hope one can tidy up in such false registrations if they exist.

The murder of Mahatma Gandhi as evidence of Hörbiger, Ehamgasse

Modern Language Review for January 1948 - the murder of Mahatma Gandhi was at the end of that month - has the following titles of articles:

1. 'Piers Plowman': Problems and methods of editing the B-text. By George Kane.
2. The periphrastic auxiliary verb 'do' and its use in the plays of Ben Jonson. By A.C.Partridge.
3. Thomas Percy's great schemes. By E.K.A.Mackenzie
4. Glossarial and textual notes on Gaimar's 'Estoire des Engleis'. By Alexander Bell
5. 'Tartuffe' and the comic principle in Molière. By W.G.Moore
6. Paul-Louis Courier among the cannibals. By Alexander H.Krappe
7. Some new correspondence of Petrarch and Barbato da Sulmona. By R.Weiss
8. Sumarokov's 'Hamlet'. A misjudged russian tragedy of the eighteenth century. By D.M.Lang


1. Could it be as simple as that 'manhattan' of 'editing' the 'B' and the problems therewith? The Kane = Gandhi/Kennedy - that is an easy one. 'Piers Plowman' was launched in the January 1947 issue for heralding in advance the finding of the Dead Sea Scrolls and clearly relates to the namechange of Adolf Hitler by the Ernst Röhm putsch. Hence it seems to be about my name. Jan.1947 contains e.g. articles by J.H.G.Grattan and Elmer Edgar Stoll, the Dead Sea Scrolls in the grotto.

2. Ben Jonson = John Jensen. By a 'Patriot'.

6. Alexander H.Krappe = John Gröver by the October 1916 issue. This 1948 was not so long after his alleged name-change.

8. Sumarokov's 'Hamlet'. A misjudged russian tragedy = Nathuram Godse in russian spelling, or vice versa. Gatlet = Godse etc. Cy-narokov = Cy-Naturam.

An interesting hypothesis can be launched on the parallel with the letter of nomination from Christian Oftedal. One can read parallel word by word through and find something interesting. The parallel is rough but probably enough to be something. If the verb 'do' in #2 and its use is the 'nomination' of Oftedal, then Ben Jonson = Christian Oftedal = John Jensen, which means that it was John Jensen = Nathuram Godse who 'shot' him. This also means that it was Alexander Some New H.Krappe = John Bjarne Gröver who claimed responsibility via british secret service or rather this periodical. Strangely, this suggests that I am John Jensen, which I am not, but it can be part of the hijacking plans of England. The identity-change would correspond to the one of Adolf Hitler. One notices also that the nomination letter was written 11 years before the assumed 'Mengele-chemical' disaster on 20 January 1959 in Hammerfest. The following is a parallel reading of the letter of nomination from Christian Oftedal and the 8 titles in Modern Language Review for January 1948:

20 januar 1948                 (= inauguration day USA, Hammerfest 11 years later?)
Piers plowman                 (= Adolf Hitler namechange, Ernst Röhm, Dead Sea Scrolls)

Hr. direktör Aug.Schou,
Pr.&methods of editing

No belinstituttet, Drammensv., Oslo
the b-text.       By George       Kane.The         (= By John F.Kennedy, Gandhi)

Kjære       direktør Schou
periphrastic auxiliary verb

Disse   linjer    tør jeg be        Dem oppfatte
'Do' and its use in the plays of Ben Jonson

som et forslag
by A.C.Partridge        (= Tintoretto in San Trovaso, with San Antonio)

om å gi Nobelprisen for 1948
Thomas Percy's great schemes

til Mahatma Gandhi,
By E.K.A.Mackenzie

dersom ikke forslaget kommer
Glossarial and textual notes

fra     noe     annet     hold.
on Gaimar's 'Estoire des Engleis'.

Jeg    regner    det
By Alexander Bell

som en selvfølge at forslaget i år kommer fra mange kanter
'Tartuffe'    and the comic          principle    in Molière.

men det er av og til at
By W.G.Moore.

selvfølgeligheter slår klikk.
Paul-Louis Courier

Derfor dette for        (= therefore this for/fodder - cp. the 'for'-slag above)
among the cannibals.

sikkerhets             skyld.                                         (= security's reason)
By Alexander H.Krappe. Some new                         (= the responsibility claim is by 'Gröver, John [Bjarne]')

Begrunnelsen kan komme senere         om                 nødvendig.
correspondence of Petrarch and Barbato da Sulmona. By R.Weiss

Med de beste ønsker for det gode virke i dette året.
Sumarokov's 'Hamlet'. A misjudged russian tragedy

Min kone hilser Deres frue.
of the eighteenth century.

Deres Christian Oftedal
By     D.M.         Lang

selvfølgeligheter = selv-fölge-ligheter = ho-drab-sdreulige = hochabscheulige
slår klikk = slark likk = Klatschmühle
which means that 'Hörbiger', the producer of highlifting hydraulic steel bars running in and out of tight-fitting tubes can be called a 'high-lifting sloppy mill' if the tube does not fit so tightly around as it should. 'Hör bigger' could mean that it is not the fault of the 'fold' but rather of the steel bar or 'pole'. Ma hat, ma Gandhi.

This makes for 'Paul-Louis Courier' = 'Pierre Curie' who died on 19 April 1906 when Modern Language Review was started. 'Bjerkerie[t]' could be that birch tree under which the king and crown prince of Norway stood in April 1940 - at 'Glomstuen' close to where I lived in 1962-63 when I also learnt to read at Stuevollen. 'Gloom-stuen'. 'Paul-Louis Courier' can also be interpreted as 'Bollack Jean', and hence the interpretation of the name of 'Bollack Jean' as 'Black Sea Loop' makes for the link to this murder of 1948 via Hörbiger in Ehamgasse. And when the construction via John Jensen etc dumps the responsibility for the murder on me, that means that my name - via Adolf Hitler's namechange by Ernst Röhm 1934 on my birthday 1957, which here means 'Piers Plowman' - is identified as the source of evil in a Black Sea Loop. Could be that is why the Ehamgasse project seems to be essentially related to me or rather my name - and hence to 11 September 2001.

This has cost me a lot. If the world does not want this Black Sea Loop, it should help me get my losses covered.

I handed in my 'Aufkündigung' to 'frau Poppe' (the one in charge of such) in ÖVW on 31 March 2008.

For 'hoch-ab-scheulig' and 'Klatschmühle' see also the 'hochachtungsvoll' and signature '8ell4' (looks like 'Nelly X') of Hitler's postcard. When 'lig' - the word means also 'body', 'corpse' - correlates with 'svoll' = 'swollen' ('S-tue-vollen'?), there is the reference to the bodies of Celan and Szondi found in the water of the Seine and Halensee. That leaves Hitler's signature on the murders, as also makes sense relative to the disappearance of Celan on Hitler's birthday 1970. Cp. also 'Ilana Shmueli' - Celan's childhood friend from Czernowitz (more real than my 'Gori', probably) whom he had been in contact with in the last two years of his life - relative to the word 'Klatschmühle'. Her name in Molde dialect means 'I landed in smooth water'.

The "Grammaire Hébraique abrégée" by J.Touzard is published by Editions Gabalda et Cie in 18 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris. Cp. "Gaimar's 'Estoire des Engleis'. By Alexander Bell" in title #4. This Bell also seems to be the only source credited in the Oslo Report, under point 3. It means that english is identified as a sort of 'hebrew' fra noe annet hold = from another angle/hold.

One can probably conclude from the January 1948 issue of Modern Language Review that England was behind the murder of Gandhi. Another case of horrendous terror policy that would mean.

Conclusion: There seems to be the possibility for a political abuse of my person via the role of Jean Bollack in the story. It is likely that the data does not have to mean that it was Bollack who murdered Celan and Szondi, but it seems that his name was heralded in advance via the 'subtext' which could be read out of the article titles in Modern Language Review and thereby - to the extent that one can have made for a systematic link to me and my role - one could have intended to create the impression that it was my mythological being who murdered them. And who was behind the attempt on the pope of 1981, it seems. This 'responsibility claim' assigned to me could be lifted over onto political interesters in UK/US for example via the Ehamgasse monster phenomenon and the apparent 'monkey business' in terms of abuse of my work and surveillance data on me. The purpose of this could have been to create the idea that it is the jewish-genetic diaspora who is the source of the evil and the political strategy in the subtext contained in the Modern Language Review. If these news are presented by 'walking ads' and similar phenomena, it can perhaps eventually lead to a certain suspicion against the jewish-genetic diaspora.

What lands in my postbox is normally about money in some way or other (from the bank, typically), and when the influx of money is small, the amount of post is as well. If this means that there is a filtering of post somewhere which is not about 'money' = hebrew 'Gori', I hope that such abuse of my person will be stopped. It could be for making an identity with this Ehamgasse monster. Cp. also the financial crisis of 2008-2009. I suppose the international secret service controls some bottlenecks where the addresses of post can be scanned automatically.

MLR January 1947 and the Dead Sea Scrolls

The scrolls were found in early (probably February) 1947 in a cave in 'Qumran' which in russian spelling comes out as Hitler, Gitler, Kitlap. The 'hair-dryer' could be a sort of 'lap-kit'. The hypothesis here is that the Dead Sea Scrolls were british scholarship swindle as nazi propaganda for the opening of the state of Israel, for the change of hijack from Jensen-Lenin to Gröver-Gandhi and one notices the role of Gudmund Harlem in the later career of Gröver/'Mengele'. The scrolls were found around the time when Gudmund Harlem was a 'Rockefeller Fellow', according to his later CV. The scrolls had allegedly (Microsoft Encarta) been produced by an order of jewish mystics concerned with the judgement of God - which in nazi philosophy could be about the effects of verboten chemicals.

1. The text of 'Piers Plowman': A newly discovered manuscript and its affinities. By J.H.G.Grattan
2. Symbolism in Shakespeare. By Elmer Edgar Stoll
3. Ben Johnson's debt to renaissance scholarship in 'Sejanus' and 'Catiline'. By Ellen M.T.Duffy
4. The reflection of Wordsworth's personality in his choice of french writers. By Herbert G.Wright.
5. Some early critical work of Emile Zola: 'Livres d'aujourd'hui et de demain' (1866). By L.W.Tancock.
6. The psychology of the 'picaro' in 'El Buscón'. By A.A.Parker
7. Some considerations relating to Georg Büchner's opinions on history and the drama and to his play 'Danton's Tod'. By A.H.J.Knight.
8. German literary and linguistic publications during the war years 1939-44. By Clair Baier.

1. 'Piers Plowman' clearly is about Adolf Hitler's namechange with elemental conversion from the water in the sea to the soil thrown up by the plow and the Ernst Röhm putsch of 1934, which hence means me. The article even discusses some pagination issues (of the recently discovered renaissance manuscript, cp. the 'Dead Sea Scrolls', of T-262 type). 'Grattan' would be 'in the grotto' where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in early 1947.

2. Symbolism in Shakespear could of course be about the Hamlet who sees the ghost, and here about the hamlet where the scrolls were found.

3. Ben Johnson's debt to renaissance scholarship in 'Sejanus' and 'Catiline'. By Ellen M.T.Duffy = John Jensen is 'Dead' (suggesting Mengele), 'Sej anus' = 'Sea', 'Catiline' = 'Scrolls'. If Jensen is dead and Mengele is his resurrection has taken his place (Ben Johnson's debt to renaissance scholarship = John Jensen's dead, Josef Mengele is doctor), he could be 'Stuffy'. According to his CV, Jensen changed identity to Gröver in 1946. This article is from January 1947. Which means that it could be a very precious piece of evidence that Gröver really was Mengele and not Jensen - a point which seems to be of utmost importance for understanding the history of the coup of Lenin: Indeed it would also be the reason for the murder of Gandhi. Which of course is no 'reason' - it only makes it doubly or even triply bad. The conclusion is likely to be that Jensen and Mengele swapped identities (in Innsbruck?) - could be they even were twins.

4. The later use of the association of Wordsworth with Bachmann in July 1973 before the death of Bachmann could be a part of the origin of the idea that should could have been an agent when she was with Celan in January 1948. However, more likely it is that 'the reflection of Wordsworth's personality' means 'William Foxwell Albright' or even 'in his' = 'William Brownlee' and that 'choice of french writers' = 'John C.Trevor', two persons of much importance for the earliest stage of the discovery in 1947.

5. The 'early critical work' is likely to be just these early scholars who could testify the likely authenticity. 'Eliezer Sukenik' is another early person and could perhaps be recognized as 'Emile Zola'?

6. The psychology of the 'picaro' in 'El Buscón': Could be about the 'bedouin' who according to legend threw a stone into a cave up in the rock in the belief that one of his goats had escaped in there - and the sound of pottery smashed by his stone made him climb up to see - and that is how he found the scrolls. This could perhaps even be about the role of 'Ziegler' - the 'toothpicker'. She was dentist at Sellanrå (= 'sell him raw') school.

7. Georg Büchner's opinions on history and the drama could be about the role of 'Gudmund Harlem'

8. 'Clair Baier' could be about 'Konrad Bayer' and his death in 1964

Bachmann and Bayer-Mayer

'Literar-Mechana', as tells their history on their web page, have administered author's rights in Austria since the fifties. One could, as far as the 'american' factor is concerned, tell the story of the austrian author 'Jean Amery' who was born 'Hans Mayer'. He died (allegedly suicided, I think it was) on 17 October 1978, exactly on the day 5 years after Ingeborg Bachmann and only a few days after the death of John Paul I, some 2,5 years before the attempt on John Paul II, and in rather immediate context of the pope shifts of 1978. Now his original name 'Hans Mayer' is in an immediate name-relation with the austrian author 'Konrad Bayer' (cp. 'Clair Baier' of 1947) who died on 10/10-1964 - he allegedly suicided by gas after having presented some of his work for 'Group 47' (including Bachmann and Celan), according to Wikipedia on the web. He was known as an 'avant-garde' author - I don't know if that lends some 'bias' to his name or story - but maybe he was vulnerable to such interpretations - the web page tells that police sometimes was needed to tidy up in his literary salon meetings. Now if the name-rewrite of 'Mayer' into 'Amery' applies to 'Bayer Konrad' it gives 'abery okradn' or simply something close to 'Abercrombie': If that is taken to be the form 'Keith Abercrombie' over the door in San Pantalon, by the genetic homunculus, the 'Heinrich-Himmler' lifted hand figure and the 'C-round-B' pulley (Konrad Bully? - I think he is considered a serious avantgarde author, though, and that such epithets would perhaps not be fair to his role - in particular if 'Konrad Bullet' is the interpretation of the attempt on the pope) in the corner, there is the 'american' indexation of 'Heinrich Himmler' inherent in the death of Jean Amery - via the mythological role assigned to me. This 'american' reference is perhaps contained in the 'Columbia Pictures' logo, and one can assume that the death of Amery in 1978 not long after the death of John Paul I could include an attempt to make use of the names Bachmann and Bayer relative to the contents of MLR Jan 1947 - with Wordsworth and Baier. And then even 'Emile Zola' seems relevant to 'Amery Jean'. Bachmann was allegedly badly burnt in a bathtub where she (her clothes) seems to have taken on fire in September 1973 and she was taken to hospital and died from the wounds on 17 October. Her friends called it murder and reported it to the police. (I had left the state church of Norway on 17 September, according to the registers, and I know that the date must be roughly right and it probably is). It seems from 'Modern Language Review' July 1973 that even Bachmann's death could have been arranged from England. Here are the titles of the articles:

1. Juvenal and restoration modes of translation. By R.Selden
2. 'King Lear' in the eighteenth century. By Philip Hobsbaum
3. Some Wordsworthian Transparencies. By A.H.Gomme
4. The lament of Edward II. By T.M.Smallwood
5. Machiavellism in Etienne Pasquier's 'Pourparler du Prince'. By John Parkin
6. 'La revue des deux mondes' in transition: From the death of naturalism to the early debate on literary cosmopolitanism. By Catherine A. Barry
7. Proust's novel in a novel: 'Un amour de Swann'. By Eléonore M.Zimmermann
8. Cervantes's 'El Licendiado Vidriera': Meaning and structure. By Gwynne Edwards
9. Salomon Gessner's idylls as prose poems. By J.L.Hibberd
10. From the 'Neue Gedichte' to the 'Duineser Elegien': Rilke's Chandos crisis. By Richard Sheppard
11. Beginnings and endings in the icelandic family sagas. By Kathryn Hume
12. The rag with ambition: The problem of self-will in Dostoyevsky's 'Bednyye lyudi' and 'Dvoynik'. By W.J.Leatherbarrow

(Front page title of the last tells of "Dostoyevsky's early novels", cp. 'Malina' as Bachmann's late novel).

1. How did Bachmann get into that tub? 'Juvenal and restoration modes of translation' = 'nale-vuj and reise-natt-skjorte som får av skjeen snart' = 'needle-vuj and travel-night-shirt which get the spoon off quickly' suggests in fact drugs. But that is only when one reads it in norwegian with the 'Jean Bollack' = 'anje lack-ob' mode of reading.

2. King Lear' in the eighteenth century. By Philip Hobsbaum: 'King Lear Hobsbaum' sounds like 'Ingeborg Bachmann'. The 18th birthday is the day of own authority - but for the cases of church matters this is the 16th birthday in Norway, and that is the story of me leaving the church on 17 September after 'filling' my 16th birthday ('fylle 16 år') on 29 June. I had talked about it through the summer. Hilde Löveid was in fact born the day before I left the church, but of course I did not know about that. Cp. 'Philip Hobsbaum'.

3. Some Wordsworthian Transparencies = med oss var det en straa-venn sies rapp-snart = with us was there a straw-friend says quickly/hurry-up. Bachmann had no other choice, of course, than to contact the caretaker of the house, who was a friend of her, and ask her to bring some medicine and contact doctor.

4. The lament of Edward II. By T.M.Smallwood - the mental for d avteII, or mental foward...

Etc. One notices the bathtub with the swan and the icelandic family sagas (hot baths) and the parallelism to her own novel 'Malina' in terms of Dostoyevsky and the 'self-will' therein. The caretaker could not find any other identification paper for her to take with in the ambulance than a copy of her own book 'Malina', according to Höller's biography. One must therefore conclude that there exists such a 'structure' in this July 1973 issue which in 1978 with the death of John Paul I and Jean Amery points back to Konrad Bayer 1964 which provides a link to Abercrombie and hence the Himmler figure in San Pantalon - via my role and the Eisenhower doctrine and hence the 'walking ad' phenomenon of 'space shuttles'.

'Literar-Mechana' was established in the fifties - I don't know if Bayer had any unpublished works deposited in a sealed envelope there - cp. the concept of of 'black seal up'. According to their web page, they were reorganized on 1 January 2007. I was in there on 22 January 2007 and deposited in a sealed envelope my work 'The Endmorgan Quartet', the first 15 (or 16, depending on how one counts) books in what I then thought was the final version, before the 16th (or 17th) book was added to the work in the summer 2008.

The conclusion seems to be that there is the possibility for an inherent responsibility claim on the attempt on the pope in 1981 in terms of this british periodical to the extent that it makes for a reference to the american phenomenon of the 'Columbia' and 'Challenger'. The attempt on the pope was at the end of a 3-2-1 countdown (Gandhi, Lennon, Reagan and the pope correlated with the 'holy hijacker') and it had a counterpoint in the 'Columbia' space shuttle disaster on 1-2-3 (1 February 2003) - hence the up and down of a 'walking ad's boards in front and back, connected with ropes or straps ('Strebs') over the shoulders. If, in addition, there is the concept of 'klump-i-lår-halsen', as for Loristrasse parallel with Ehamgasse, there is a further reference to the 'walking' and what could be 'added' to it. Hence the AD = AT = Austria and the slightly strange gait which could be the result of 'litt rar me[d] Kana' = 'a bit strange with Kana'. I don't know if Gröver/'Mengele' had a 'cigar' in his colon, to be opened (bank account number, codeword for identification in the secret service etc) only after his departure in 1990 if he really was Mengele, but that could have made him equally 'strange' on the other side. I don't know the details but can report that he seemed to be in control of his ring-muscle in the sense of being able to emit gases (and sounds thereby) in a controlled and willed fashion in a home sofa environment. (Cp. the Columbia Pictures logo). He sometimes demonstrated this capacity of his. I have no reason to believe that the gases were of 'cigar' smoke type - and it may be that not so many people have the chance to report on those details. They are, for example, not detectable by way of microphone. If the detail is essential for a political interpretation of the Columbia Pictures logo, it could reinforce the mythological role of my person. Wasn't there a US film called 'Profession reporter' or something like that? If there is a connection between 'Havana' and 'Gruecleb[7]' = 'Gruppe Elg', this could be a further reference to a (Havana) 'cigar' metaphor. One notices also the inherent turn-around of only one half of the phonological form, as for the 1-2-3-4 = 3-4-2-1 of 'Bollack' = 'lack-ob' (for the possible reference to a mutilated Sachs) and the 'Jean' = 'Anje[l]' even of 'Jean Amery'.

I notice the corresponding rewrites of the names 'Jörg Haider' = 'rgöj ahderi' = 'ah, det er i Norge' = 'ah, it's in Norway', and hence 'is fun ah-it's in' = 'sex is fun' perhaps in a verboten blood-vein sense of it (cp. also title 1. above), and 'Thomas Klestil' = 'masoth lketils' = 'my shuttle ketils'. My neighbour at the student town in Oslo in 1987-88 was called 'Ketil Egge'. It happened once that I was in the bathroom and the door to my room had been opened by somebody when I was out. I don't think I left it like that but I don't know who was shuttling in while I was out of the 'space'. The incidence made the hair rise on my head for some reason or other - could be it was the name of the neighbour. I remember I developed some slight panic with the idea that somebody could have left something among my clothes in the cupboard in the shared and open corridor. It is only now that I can see a reflex of this in 'thomas klestil' = 'doubtful clothes-style'. I never found any reason for this idea at that time.

There was a strange feeling of 'gloom' which developed in the course of 2007 in Vienna. Could be it was not only I who experienced it. I believed that it meant that there was 'verboten' going on. I sometimes fancied that the ambulances I saw were driving people off to more or less verboten treatment. I don't know the reason for this feeling. Could have been this Ehamgasse phenomenon if the Abr-Eham virtual being is developed as a political thing.

Could be the Modern Language Review should be enough for the conclusion that England should be excluded from EU, NATO, the Security Council and the Commonwealth and its nuclear arms dismantled. The evidence in the periodical could suffice for the conclusion that it is a terrorist state based on fraud. 'Confidence' is a phenomenon which resembles the deposit of a manuscript in a sealed envelope, in the goodddd faith that it will remain closed. We must hope that the Columbia Pictures logo is not about the fizz when a seal is opened - be that a skull or an envelope or whatever. The austrian Staatsvertrag of 1955 can perhaps be called a 'Statute of Liberty', like the statue in New York showing the stand-up figure holding the torch's high up in the air.

The death of Luigi Nono

The following is written without knowledge of the details of Nono's death - I have so far not received any response from the Nono archives - but is presented here as a tentative hypothesis.

Luigi Nono was born on 29/1-1924 and died on 8/5-1990. He was born and died in the house where his [probably] grandfather the painter Luigi Nono lived since 1888. It is on Zattere in Venice, the topographic correlate to Voldgaten 1 in the Old Town of Fredrikstad in Norway (where I lived at the end of the seventies) and Bergsundsstrand 23 on Söder in Stockholm (Nelly Sachs' home). His date of death could be related to the time when I got a stipend for studying in Hungary, where people say 'rögtön' and 'jövök' and things like that. Nono was married to Schönberg's daughter Nuria, which is what makes 8 May relevant as the liberation day of Norway in 1945 after the german wartime occupation. Nono died 45 years after this. Which means 8 May 1900 as the mirror image. But the date May 8 is also the 'Mayotte' of the 'Magiotto' in the Chiesa dei SS.XII Apostoli - opposite to the Tiepolo - and hence it represents something like Mayotte and Jean Bollack and the russian invasion ('liberation day'?) of Czechoslovakia ('check that old Apostoli church') 1968 in the mirror point around my 11th birthday 29 June 1968 (I was born in 1957) - which was in the exact mid point of the norwegian government of Per Borten (from 12 October 1965 to 17 March 1971) which hence means dr.Verboten as a political label on me as a representative of the jewish-genetic diaspora. It could also have meant 'pair aborted' about my two genetic parents. Which means that Nono's death could have been a murder if the purpose was to engineer this '1900' (cp. also Bertolucci's film from 1975) on the clockdial of Tiepolo in the Apostoli church for the concept of GAS-PAS-GAS element PAS = 'Petter Andre Syversen' (the second turn of Mr.Seven'o'clock). Gisele Celan died in the year 1991 when my residence permit in Hungary expired - there had even been problems with stamping it in my passport in January for which reason there were two stamps and the first was overstamped 'ervenytelen' = 'invalid'. It was also the year after my three humble leaflets on music notation rules for automated editors were published at the institute of informatics in Oslo (at the end of 1989, could be closer to 1990) - a minor event indeed but it was a publication via others and therefore something remarkable in my life. That publication - an offer for knowledge - could also have been taken to be about the exposure of the naked breast - the temptation of the 'diavolo' or 'diaspora' - in the Tintoretto painting of the temptation of San Antonio in the church of San Trovaso - and indeed Nono lived in just that 'parochia', only a stone's throw or two from the church. There is a reflex of the rest of that Tintoretto painting of the temptation of San Antonio in other parts of the Old Town in Fredrikstad, such as 'Glacis-gata' (cp. 'the glacier') or on 'Vaterland'. That could have left the role of 'Terje Westfoss' to Nono - and hence he would have been correlated with Paul Celan if that was the associative 'role' of Westfoss, who has some similarities with Celan. Westfoss, Celan and Nono were in fact somewhat similar. (Around 1979-1980, Westfoss moved 'Movig-gården' from another location to Vaterland close to the Old Town along with Jarle Bruvig whom I have compared - on somewhat subjective associative basis - with the salvadorian poet Roque Dalton - perhaps that could be due to the myth of Dalton escaping from prison when an earthquake knocked a hole in his cell, which can be taken to mean 'Jalre Burvig'). They were also somewhat similar.

I don't know where Nono's flat was, but the memorial signs on the house is outside the flat on the first floor, corresponding to the one of Svein Otto Hofplass when I lived in Voldgaten 1. 'Svei Nono Hofmlass' etc., which via 'nazi' logic can be seen as comparable to the name of Nono. 'Svei Hof m/lass', ergo 'Lui gay'. Kalle Solgaard took over the flat after Hofplass. With the transform via Nono's flat on Zattere, it corresponds 'topographically' to the flat of Sachs on Söder. Now there is a 'Dr.Rina Nono' living there, allegedly a sister. It was I think in the seventies that Ragna Gröver told me about 'Ole Rinnan' and his terrible gang - the most hated and cruel gangleader of the norwegian nazis during the second world war. His was famed for being very ugly - a real 'beast' it was - according to the story told by Ragna Gröver. There exists a photo of me from Hammerfest where my swollen eyes (from allergics or chemical mistreatment, I don't know) could make me comparable to Rinnan on the famous photo of him. (I think Ragna Gröver even added the psychological observation that Rinnan probably suffered from an 'inferiority complex' - and if so, it could have brought an even closer association with my early childhood). It was in probably 1978 or 1979 that Terje Westfoss (who resembles Luigi Nono somewhat remarkably) came walking up the stairs to my flat in the Old Town in circumstances which perhaps could resemble the one of me coming into the house on Stuevollen in probably 1963 and met Gröver/'Mengele' with a blank look in his eyes. I think this was when Westfoss invited me for a meal of 'quails' in his home along with Bruvig and others (if that were not another time, but I think it was then and it was at least an invitation, as far as I remember). One notices 'Dan Quayle'. Of course Westfoss would perhaps not have known these circumstances although he could of course have reported 'blank look' on the young fellow up there. A second's whirl warl. Which means that if the plan or interest of british administration could have been to associate me with Gröver/'Mengele' more than with Celan, they could in principle have organized a murder of Nono on this background - for swapping the role of me at home and Nono-looking Westfoss coming up in the late seventies with me running into the house where Gröver/'Mengele' was standing in probably 1963. I found a 'biography' (or rather discussion of some works) of Nono published on Palermo 'EPOS': Ramazzotti's book does not contain mention of the circumstances of Nono's death but there are some peculiar photos there. The lack of a diagonal in the EPOS relative to the singer EROS could perhaps be indicative of such 'Mengele'-hre ideas.

The deaths of Sachs and Celan in May and April 1970 seem to be indexed in the April 1970 issue of the periodical - with one half of the titles for each of them. I must add that another neighbour in Voldgaten 1 in the old town in Fredrikstad in 1978-80 was called 'Per Magnus Halvorsen', which could be taken to be an indexation of just this two-halves-phenomenon in the april 1970 issue. (There exists also a wellknown linguist with name Per Kristian Halvorsen). Per Magnus Halvorsen's name also finds a reflex in Celan quoting Büchner in his 'Der Meridian' ("Als ich gestern neben am Tal hinaufging..."). On my website I earlier speculated if there could have been any links between Halvorsen and Andreas Baader, but that was only on basis of the notable similarity of the form 'Badr-Mein-Hof' with the name 'Bachmann Ingeborg' and the presence of Hofplass in the house: If I am the son of Celan, as seems to be the story, then the source has likely gone via Bachmann in February 1948 - which can be taken to be the theme of the film "The third man". I don't think Halvorsen was Baader but there could be some administrative links between them nevertheless - for such reasons as this Bachmann. But then it seems, from my discussion of the material on my website, that the real issue is Jean Bollack - the alleged friend of Celan since the late fifties ('in Freundschaft verbunden', as he phrases it is some book).

If Celan visited me in Odda when I was three years old, it would have been on 3 September 1960. Could be that is the reason why the news of the abduction of Ingrid Betancourt in 2002 left such a strong impact on me - my lefthand side was completely numbed for several days and I had problems with walking and typing. It started soon after I had read the newspiece on internet and spread from my lefthand index finger to the rest of the body. It is only recently that I have observed that there is a 4 September Road at Bologne-Billancourt outside Paris, not so far from where Celan was found in the Seine in 1970. I had a similar sort of 'crisis' in 1989 after I had shared office with a person 'sittin next to' me - whose name was 'Dag Diesen'. '3 september 1960' in norwegian is 'tredje september nitten seksti'.

The Modern Language Review for July 1991 tells with undertext encoding of the finding of the glacier mummy 'Ötzi' and the death of Celan's wife Gisele Celan-Lestrange on 9 December 1991, after she had discovered her cancer in October. The real story in the titles of that July 1991 issue seems, though, to have been Gröver/'Mengele' picking out a 'cigar' from his colon - a small metal container with counterhooks and the secret identity code inside which could have been put in there when he started his service 50 years earlier if he were an agent. That 'cigar' could have been the 'Gisele' (hence 'Mengele' = 'Ngemele' = 'hemmeli' = 'secret') and the 'gletscherous' cigar would have been that 'Ötzi' who was born from the glacier. The secret code in the cigar would have been his 'ouioui nono' - either identity or not. 'Ötzi' was found on 19/9-1991 and this could have been a prediction of 11/9-2001 ten years ahead - in which case the date is not necessarily motivated by my novel. The mummy had allegedly been in the glacier for 5000 years but that is likely to be a suggestive concept for subjective time if he had been subjected to Mengele methods. Likely to be another case of british fraud - in particular if he is indexed in advance there in MLR.

The skin of the 'glacier mummy' was brown - like the name of Nono's teacher and contemporary Bruno Maderna. Cp. 'modern music'. Maderna was born in Venice in 1920 and died a few days after Ingeborg Bachmann in 1973. There are 401 months from Nono's birthday to mine, and his death was 99 days into 1990, same year as Gröver/'Mengele' 'died'. 401 + 99 = 500, cp. the likely number of NOKs in 1980 and the 5000 years of 'Ötzi'. 'Öt' is hungarian for '5', hence 'fifsy' for '50' - or even 'five see'.

One can add the function of two names for 'Ötzi', both of them from Gressvik in 'Onsöy' county which is united to Fredrikstad with the bridge at 'Seut' only a few hundred metres from Labråten, cp. 'Ötzi' and 'coming soon' (in particular if coming in a car towards Labråten - then one is soon there) = 'in-kom Onsöy': 'Freddy Fjellheim' = 'Freddy Mountainhome' (= glacie) and 'Kalle Solgård': 'Kalle' = 'kalde' = 'cold' and 'skare' is the phenomenon of new snow which has melted on top in the sunshine and frozen in the cold of the night. 'Underscore' (such as for the hypothetical 'Rögtön Jövök') could then mean 'under the hard surface of the snow' or simply cold under the hard surface which emerges when the sun goes down = 'Kalle Solgård'. Gröver/'Mengele' used to take me for walks in the district called 'Skaret' in Molde. There was also one story from my time as teacher in Haugsvik in the spring 1977 when the school had a ski-day and I fell on such 'skare' and ploughed with my nose through it. The nose was bleeding a little and I returned to the rest of the school folks in a little lower mood. Had I even broken a ski? Not the most typical noseman. There is mention of this 'multiple' broken nose in the decription of 'Ötzi'. Gröver/'Mengele' also had a slanting nose which must have been broken at some time. There is a third Gressvik person in the mythological pantheon - that is 'Morten Sörlie'.

With this 'ut-se' = 'se-ut' one can reconstruct the meaning of 'Rögtön Jövök' on the form 'Kjönrök Fuck-you'. 'Kjönrök' is translated as 'lampblack', a pigment made from 'carbon' (cp. Carbon 14) from lamps. I recall Gröver/'Mengele' explaining what it was - a stuff similar to tar somehow. (Was it even while we were painting the flower grid in Molde?) 'Kjönn' is norwegian for 'gender', and 'rök' can mean that it burst, snapped, was torn in two. One can think of this pigment as what has been smeared on the dead body called 'Ötzi', for giving it the yellow-brown taint. This 'kjönrök' (I thought it also could be written 'tjönrök' but maybe K-initial is normal) is likely to be the god the nazis had planned to make out of e.g. my mythological figure - a future legend who probably never existed but about whom there are lots of stories. Something like that. US films seem to be full of it in their mythological narrative substructure. His blessing could have been the characteristic 'fuck you'. He was the god of Abr-Eham etc. Could be the nazis have planned to rewrite the whole Old Testament for making a new judaism - with this 'Kjönrök' as the main divinity or only god. One notices the israeli 'Cast lead' in Gaza.

According to this hypothesis, if Nono were murdered for this political 'project', one should find his name and address in Modern Language Review for April 1990. One certainly does, and the impression is that the purpose was to dump the blame on his wife Nuria:

1. Marriage comedy after the 1688 revolution: Southern to Vanbrugh. By Michael Cordner
2. Text, 'Text', and Swift's A tale of a tub. By Marcus Walsh
3. D.H.Lawrence's Mr.Noon as a postmodern text. By Earl G.Ingersoll
4. Poetry of exclusion: A feminist reading of some troubadour lyrics. By Simon Gaunt
5. The unity of Flaubert's Tentation de saint Antoine (1874). By R.B.Leal
6. Louis Landin: Mauriac's Mounsieur Ouine? By J.E.Flower
7. The italian futurist theatre: A reappraisal. By R.S.Gordon
8. Mirror and self in symbolist and post-symbolist poetry. By Margaret Stoljar
9. 'Und es ist kein gott ausser Adolf Hitler': The biblical motifs in Brecht's Arturo Ui and related works as political counter-propaganda. By Robert Atkins
10. Some slavonic translations of Sienkiewicz's Janko Muzykant: The translator as naturalist. By Kevin Windle


1. Southern to Vanbrugh: 'Sören til vannbruk' - a blaming on the form 'shit, such wateruse' = "why so much water used" = dumping the blame on somebody else for the excessive use of water - which could suggest that Nono had done it himself and his wife was blamed for the death. It was in 1988 that I shared office with somebody and there seemed to be a 'turnaround' of some kind

2. Text, 'Text', and Swift's A tale of a tub = Ingeborg Bachmann and her 'Malina'. (Male kontoret?)

3. Mr.Noon = Mr.Nono

5. Tentation de saint Antoine = San Trovaso nearby with Tintoretto's painting

6. Mounsieur Ouine = Mr. Ouioui Nono

7. italian reappraisal: French Oui = Ouioui (Luigi), italian Noon = Nono

8. Mirror and self in symbolist and post-symbolist poetry - does this mean that Nono was transported away from his home for verboten misteatment ('Flower') while an identical copy was left behind

9. Arturo Ui = the author Ouioui = Luigi

10. Janko Muzykant = (Janko antenna?) of musician = Nono to verboten?

The death of Luigi Nono on 8 May 1990 was on Norway's (Nuria's) Liberation day 1945 which suggests the 'Statute of Liberty', which means that the whole program around this Columbia Pictures and the space shuttles could be thought of as applying to 'Nuria' = 'Norway'. Would it be about 'Nutritia' for the exposed breast on the Tintoretto of San Antonio's temptation in San Trovaso?

What could be important to observe is the topographic relevance of Voldgaten 1 in Old Town in Fredrikstad relative to Nono's home on Zattere - and to Sachs' home in Bergsundsstrand on Söder ('Zatter-e'). There is even a certain relevance of Vaterland as well as the Ötzi character who is interpreted by Glacisgata across the river. If these structures again index the concept of 'fluttering sloughs', it could even be about Ziegler's Bogart frock on mythological skis down 'Hell' behind Varden.

It seems that one can add Nono to the list of victims of the british war against intellectuals. It is a miracle if one continues to consider britons a part of the normal intellectual world if this is the story.

Nazi logic which could be behind this: 'Du fiser om natta' ('you fart at night') for 'du fiser av Zattere' ('you fart from this Zattere [story]'). A theory could therefore be: If people fart in sleep they cannot be married. But how can they learn to stop farting under the bedcover? One will have to do some exercises at day in order to stop it - and then picking the nose is a natural strategy 'on the other side'. Which means that if one starts farting at night because of this story from Zattere with the dumping of the blame on the wife, then one will also start picking one's nose in order to rescue the marriage. But since this is on the other side, it is not about 'nes[e] pille' but about 'pese nille' = 'Pernille', the mate of PAS. Hence GAS-PAS-GAS. 'Ne-spille' = 'to play down'.

Ramazzotti's book mentions his notice of Ulrike Meinhof's death on 9 or 8 May 1976 as a case of suicide as part of a heroic political struggle, but a closer study of the story could be suggestive of the point that the official date of her death could have been a pretelling of the schedule for his own death 14 years later, in which case it would have been an official project. But the story with Westfoss was after 1976. The essential data would have been the intervals 1900-1945-1990 for the liberation day 8 May and 21 January 1900-1924-1948 for the death of Lenin and the 'third man' / 'third mother' relation of Bachmann to Celan in Vienna. The death of Lenin got its apparent responsibility claim in the book of Henri Guilbeaux of 1923 (January, I think), and the name of Jan-Henrik Ihlebaek as Eisenhower doctrine #5. One notices the friendship of Bachmann with Hans Werner Henze since 1953. The purpose with the murder of Bachmann and Nono could have been to create the impression that she was an agent for british secret service and hence even for the Baader-Meinhof project, and by dumping the blame on Nuria Schönberg this intrigue would have been reinforced.

It is incredible how easy the british game seems to be, according to their MLR: They use terror for dumping the blame on me indexed as 'dirty beast in the revelation' and european intellectuals believe England is the right place and that I represent Adolf Hitler. It is the Norway connection which could be dirty business, not the Nuria connection. It is possible that Nono could have been naive about these Meinhof matters and that could have been an important part of the reason for his death. Cp. Badrmein-Hof = Ingeborg Bachmann.

My own birth in 1957, officially on 29 June 1957

Finally, if all this is about me as a central character in a crazy british-mythological theatre, one naturally looks up April 1957 to see if my birth is heralded in advance. It is, and here is even this particular theory up and going:

1. The application of textual theory to Hamlet's dying words. By Winifred M.T.Nowottny.
2. Ben Jonson's 'To Sir William Sidney, on his birthday'. By Lisle C.John
3. Further notes on Flaubert's realism. By Marjorie Shaw
4. Zola's 'Le Rêve' as an experimental novel. By J.H.Matthews
5. Numbers in Otfried's 'Evangelienbuch'. By Hilda Swinburne
6. 'Vicissitudes' in Gotfried's 'Tristan'. By H.B.Willson
7. The place of 'Martin Salander' in Gottfried Keller's evolution as a prose writer. By J.M.Ritchie


1. The marriage of contextual theory to Eham-gasse. Win[d]ifred = fis-i-fred ('fart-in-peace')? Backwards it gives 'ynHoward'-[sth]-Aderfitler'.

2. John Jensen's 'To John Bjarne Gröver on his birthday'. By Lisle C.John = Paul Celan (ul = l isle?). The last words Jensen said before he died = the theory of Ehamgasse? But that means 'The third man' and the words Celan in Bachmann's home? That means that Celan is the father, but recognized as John Jensen who seems to have been murdered by Mengele who took his place and changed name to Gröver.

3. This Gröver = Flaubert and his realism. By 'force majeure'. Such force majeure can be what drives the wind out of the body and it can be the counterattack from 'antispiritists' = those who do not like such 'britons'. Winifred M.T.Nowattny. This means that the program on me is likely to be that I am a 'fart' and hence 'anti-spiritism' in the sense of 'anti-britism' is likely to be turned against myself.

4. Zola's 'Le Rêve' as an experimental novel = Zattere's 'Le Ræv' ('The Arse') as an experimental navel = british metaphysics giving reason for the murder. This tells the whole story. This is the mid point in the series 1-7. By Swinburne Hilda = By Swin Pernille = by picking the nose = theoretic strategy against the main problem of the night, the fart. Evangelienbuch = Lien Evange-Buch = Lönne Christiansen. For J.H.Matthews, read also backwards 'sue them oldies' - cp. the name 'Sönnesy' = 'sew the son'. If all the three police names mentioned in the beginning of this article can be read not only from my diary novel of 2.3.95 but also from this MLR April 1957, the choice of these police for the transportation job could have had a motivation in e.g. a wish for showing the origin of my text in this contents of the periodical in 1957. Zattere could also mean the Tiepolo with the indexation of Afghanistan and Iraq.

5,6,7. Otfried, Gotfried, Gottfried = letters scissored off one by one on reverse = by Leonie Sachs. That means that the Hamlet = Klipra connection.

5. Numbers = calculated = Regna. Evangelienbuch = Augusta Devold?

6. 'Vicissitudes' in Gotfried's 'Tristan' = V-scissor-tit/etude JohnB-jarneG-röver. Sissel Sotude = Sissel So-LI-tude = Eidsvig Ronka = Ragna Eidsvig. The 'Li' derives from the 'V-Scissors' = 'Li' Sachs. 'Eidsvig' backwards = 'Givsdie' = 'given to nurse' = 'V-scissor-tit'. Sissel Otterlei = Sissel Octogon is a possible variant. By H.B.Willson = Leonie Sachs: If the scissoring of the letters is 'age' and 'B', then it is as with foggy eyes = 'Le Onie', or 'Naily'. Well, could be. 'Baedgy B' = 'Leonie'? 'Willson' is the decisive tool, the scissors, the 'SAKS'.

The application of textual theory = the place of 'Martin Salander'
To Hamlet's dying words = in Gottfried Keller's evolution as a prose writer
By Winifred M.T.Nowottny = by J.M.Ritchie.
J.M.Ritchie backwards gives something close to 'Eidsvig Aron', for which reason the identity means that Adolf Hitler = Aron Eidsvig.

The whole construction displays a mirror-symmetry around the mid point as a bottom with two buttocks and a hole turned-around (novel, navel) in the middle - which perhaps could be taken to mean 'Jean Buttocks' = 'John Gröver'.

There are traces of the 'program' of the Scriblerus Club's "Memoirs of Martinus Scriblerus" (from 1741 or thereabout). There are traces in this book of interests in a fraudulent program. While Martinus was still in the womb, his father set apart annual sums for "the recovery of Manuscripts, the effossion of Coins, the procuring of Mummies". "It happen'd on a time, the said Gaspar made a visit to Scriverius at Haerlem; taking with him a comely Lady of his acquaintance who was skilgul in the Greek Tongue; of whom the learned Scriverius became so enamour'd, as to inebriate his friend, and be familiar with his Mistress: I am not ignorant of what Columesius affirms, that the learned Barthius was so overtaken...". See the story of Harlem and Gröver/'Mengele'. The Dead Sea Scrolls were 'found' while Harlem was abroad, before he returned to Norway. Chapter 2 of the Martinus biography is about "The speech of Cornelius over his Son, at the Hour of his Birth" (see 2 above). Chapter 6 is about "Of the Gymnastics, in what exercises Martin was educated; something concerning Musick, and what a sort of a Man his Uncle was". The identity of my granduncle Aron Eidsvig and Adolf Hitler seems to be the 'fart' which is 'top secret'. That is likely to be the reason why even I seem to be 'top secret' in the sense of political resistance to e.g. publication of my authorship. And that is likely to be why I am taken to be a 'walking ad' (with straps over 'Zola') for the historic fact that Hitler was Eidsvig and secret agent for England - and there goes the democrat party apparently with Hilary Clinton in the role of a 'walking ad' for a new holocaust! As if this web page, wherein I try to come to grips with the facts of history, were an ad for a new holocaust! Then it is about couping my role - such as even Gaza 2008 could be about. If the Eisenhower doctrine is of the positive and not the negative kind in the last analysis (I still have not found a publisher, though, and although the Oklahoma bombing may be a democrat and not a republican project, it is certainly not mine! - I am not Hiliary Clinton), then it could be about just this phenomenon - since the progress of the 'monarchic' Hitler-nazism is likely to be founded on just that top secret. England and the US democrat party as the nazis, the US republican party as the non-nazis - that is a possible and likely analysis. And if the wars of Afghanistan and Iraq was on the backgroundof the symbolism represented also by the Tiepolo on Zattere in the sense of an 'arse' emitting 'fart', then we have got the spirituality of the nazis. The 'fart' is me as indexed by this MLR April 1957, and it clearly is the little infant in the hand of one of the saints on Tiepolo's painting. 'Howard' is the name of the actor who plays the police investigator in 'The third man', and when 'Paul Hörbiger' - cp. Hörbiger in Ehamgasse - as the porter who could have lifted the biological material of Celan from Bachmann's room in January 1948, the slight similarity of his with Leif Stene Johansen is a little interesting. (Where did I get the joke from that every mid player - I don't know what it is called, the player in the middle - or even 'striker' in the english football liga is supposed to be called 'Trevor Howard', running backwards after having missed the goal again?) However one twists and turns it, this construction of MLR April 1957 seems to mean that Mengele 'murdered' Jensen (or rather swapped identity with him) and took his place and changed name to Gröver and is the custody father, while Paul Celan is my genetic father and Adolf Hitler is the one who provided the genetic material backwards in a rape in probably Christmas 1957. And if Mengele murdered Jensen for taking his place, as in this MLR April 1957, that could mean that Mengele chemical mistreatment of Hammerfest for taking the place of the 'gensen' - which by this scheme is Hitler. This Jensen-Mengele furthermore changed identity to Gröver in 1946 - and that would mean the role-swap of Gröver/'Mengele' with Celan. The effect of this series of identity-interdependencies would mean that Hitler would take the place of the genetic parents of me representing the jewish-genetic diaspora - which means that when (or if, but maybe one can soon start skipping that 'if') Hitler was an agent for England, it is about England taking the cultural place of the jewish diaspora. The construction with 'Le Reve' on 'Zattere' will then have the function of turning the roles around for creating the impression that I am Hitler raping the Jews.

'Helen Fielding' is a name resembling 'Henry Fielding' from the early days of the novel - when the diary novel still was an experimental novel. I have not read 'Bridget Jones diary' - I have only leafed in it in a bookshop - and I have no reason to claim that it is written by a security bureau or the national british secret service, but if it should be, then it clearly could be about this 'experimental novel' of mine which could have been stolen from my computer in 1995 - and a part of the reason for the success of the 'Bridget Jones diary' could have been that it seems to present - as if it were a 'walking ad' - a top secret of very high value and extreme importance for the future of the world: It is a 'fart' (if it is) and this 'fart' encodes the innermost secret that Hitler = Eidsvig. That of course is another sort of novel than I have written and the similarity with mine seems very superficial. (For example, I list car numbers but she lists alcohol and cigarettes etc., but that again is a theme of her novel, not mine). But this is the sort of thing I do not want to touch and somebody else would have to tidy up in it if it should be a case of fraud. If it should be a case of fraud, it could have been for the idea of a 'fart' on the form 'walking ad' in which case it would be political.

MLR April 1967

There is a ten year interval from April 1957 to the MLR April 1967 issue. Here are the titles:

1. Dunbar and Villon - a comparison and a contrast. By A.M.Kinghorn
2. 'Othello' v.ii.347: 'The base indian' yet again. By Rodney Poisson.
3. Homeric parody at the gates of Milton's hell. By John E.Seaman
4. Two pieces newly ascribed to Christopher Smart. By Arthur Sherbo
5. Keats and Baldwin's 'Pantheon'. By Alan Osler
6. Jean Goulou and his 'life' of Saint Francois de Sales. By Elisabeth Stopp
7. Cruelty in Marivaux's theatre. By Haydn I.Mason
8. Albert Camus: Metaphysical revolt and historical action. By B.G.Garnham
9. Petrarch and Petrarchism in Torquato Tasso's lyric poetry. By C.P.Brand
10. Herder and Francis Bacon. By H.B.Nisbet
11. The 'Ahnfrau' controvery. By I.V.Morris
12. Otway's 'Venice preserved' and Hofmannsthal's 'Das gerettete Venedig'. By H.R.Klieneberger

The issue contains an introductory photo of 'distinguished scholar' Charles Jasper Sisson with two crossing fingers under his chin ('kebir') and 'knörva' handkerchief. John's diapora sister? 'Fart og spenning' ('speed and suspense/voltage') is the ridiculous reason why people go into the secret services - 'James Bond' etc. 'Sisten' = 'to play tag'. 'Sohn E.Jeaman' of 3 and 'hurter and francis bacon' in 10. One notices the 'Oddveig/Ostway' of Laila Oddveig Krötöe and her husband Ole Krötöe's firm 'Kabel TV' in 'da skredde TV'en dig', which could suggest the 'nursk i kesen' of Kursk nose and Cole Rudder 2000, hence Kursk-and-Cole which indexes me, if that is the reference of 'John's diapora sister'. John's Giambono is there? That is in San Trovaso (and the school dentist mutilation of me was at Trosvik School in 1970-71). Is that a predictable look under certain early secret-service circumstances? I don't know if such conditioning is possible, but one could speculate on a 1444 'potato print' for the continued hijacking of Lenin's revolution via the courteous 1444 San Crysogono, and Sisson's expression could be telling of 'JAR leber U-vik' and hence also the Tiepolo painting of Lucia in the Apostoli church. Could be for a JAR connection? Ragnar Thoursie, a swedish poet born 1919, brought in 1947, the year when the Dead Sea Scrolls were found, the first copy of Sachs' "In den Wohnungen des Todes" to Sweden after he had been to east Berlin with 'press permission'. He was (later?) central executive in the central labour market administration. 'Skitur Norge' = 'birke-beiner' = 'kebir knörva' (see 'Thoursie' and the gear handle - there was also a story from the summer 1981 which I think must have been later) = the photo of Sisson in MLR April 1967. One notices the similarity with the wellknown painting of Alexander Pope - where the 'knörva' handkerchief of Sisson is Pope's sleeve while the hands are both under the chins. This 'sleeve' could be the 'Skau' of the 'Kjak-opp-sen' = 'up to the chin' (his hand, that is) in the form 'Skau Jakobsen' as Eisenhower #7 - and I have pondered the puzzling similarity of Skau Jakobsen in Jaktveien on Kraakeröy with Goebbels, but I suppose Skau Jakobsen would not have been old enough to be the wartime criminal. If 'Petter Enok Skau Jakobsen' (cp. title #9) is Eisenhower #7, one could speculate even on a semantic link between the names of 'Thoursie' and 'Petter E[r]nok' = 'petter is-enough' = 'abba-stanza' = 'stopping the pope', cp. the 1981 attempt (and the apparently opposite form 'jäddrande hålligång', if my swedish spelling is right - cp. 'fjertende holocaust' as if I as a 'fart' should have been a driving force). But one notices that this whole construction would be completely uninteresting were it not for the photo of Sisson in MLR April 1967 (as far as I overview the material). That could either mean that the construction is uninteresting, or it could mean that it even could serve to lift the status of Modern Language Review to the main interest of the whole story. Would even the Dead Sea Scrolls have been made for that simple interest? One notices that if 'Charles Jasper Sisson' is supposed to mean also 'John's Giambono is there', one observes the possible reference to the Dead Sea Scrolls in the other Tintoretto (born 1519) of San Trovaso, in the little chapel ('La capella del Santissimo Sacramento' - I notice that HiHa was from Sacramento) which was consecrated in 1556 = 'MDLVI' on one of the pillars (Skau Jakobsen's third son is called Lars). The chapel is really a little too small for such a big painting and one sees it aslant from outside. The other Tintoretto on the other side of the same chapel (Jesus washing the feet - click here for a detail from the leaflet about the church) is an early copy, probably by some other artist, and it could be about the correlate to a concept of a 'Black Sea Loop'. San Trovaso is at Zattere but a little backdrawn from the water, behind a gondola workshop (two photos - photo #1 with a Zattere bridge to the left wherefrom was taken photo #2 with the bridge to the right where #1 was taken - the water and Giudecca on the other side is seen in the far distance in #1). With a russian T for the M and the 'Jean Goulou and life' = 'John Gröver and wife', once gets close to 'Thoursie'. MLR April 1967 with the photo of Sisson contains also the article title "'Othello' v.ii.347: 'The base indian' yet again. By Rodney Poisson". If M = T, then 'MLR' = 'tell-her' = 'o tell o'. The Tintoretto is a last supper with much 'dynamism', as some source wrote, including the strange bending down and looking up in the direction of the behind of one of them, as if two of the disciples were studying the details of the behind of a third of them. Click here for an excerpt. Gröver/'Mengele's personal doctor Rygvold before he left in 1990 was a specialist in intestine inspection. Gröver/'Mengele' had a horse-size gebisso (Giambono's horse?) installed a couple of years before he left - the church of San Trovaso is also called 'the church of San Gervasio and San Protasio'. The turning and bottom-inspection on the Tintoretto could have been interpreted as a british 'ronk röver'. Sisson's expression on the photo in MLR April 1967 could in norwegian be associated with the concept 'sur-po[m]pen' = 'the sour bottom'. Petter Enok Skau Jakobsen ran a graphics firm called 'Bonton'. (His current firm is called 'Storm' - 'stor M' = 'big M'). 'Feis' is norwegian for 'farted', not for 'face'.

Is 'Rodney Poisson' telling of the concept of 'bollekinn' = 'wall of China' = twin towers 2001? 'Varför samordnad?' = 'why coordinated'? I called Lenke Rothmann, Jean Bollack and Ragnar Thoursie - three friends or acquaintances of Sachs/Celan - and Bollack/Thoursie gave the receiver to their wives when they understood who it was. Rothmann was just on her way out to a waiting car and had to hurry. Why [apparently] coordinated? 'Sjaför va mordnad' = 'the driver was murdered'. Well I am not guilty of the Kennedy assassination and certainly not of a murder of Sachs or Celan - but if one has a murder of de Gaulle in mind (as a 'Kennedy assassination') one could perhaps say that there was a role for me in the back seat of the car at Aure-Osen. But then one has to spoon the word onsets. Could it have been Ragnar Thoursie who drove the car - as a friendly gesture offered to her - from Stockholm to Molde and back again - and they tried to hide behind long hair curtains when they passed the camera at the border at Kongsvinger = Herder and Francis Bacon = border of Hansfraconis? Car number v.ii.347 with pomeric harrody at the gates of Hilton smell? They could have driven all the long way and slept in the car, without a chance for a shower, and maybe they were passport controlled on the way back (there is that base indian yet again). It would not have been about 'ronker i dusjen' and 'the lonie's sex', but something like that nevertheless. Not a shower but a car. If this is the story told by the passport control or at least the camera which observed the car number, I could have met not only Sachs but even Thoursie in my childhood. Wam & Venneröd - cp. 'sjaför Wam rodnad' = 'Wam & Venneröd' = 'Rodney Poisson'? - are two leading (and at least once upon a time longhaired) norwegian film-makers who have been running a film company together and made a series of films since the seventies or at least eighties. Beats and Moldeveien's 'Cantheon'. By Alan Oslo-er. If they had driven so long for seeing her child briefly on his way to school or kindergarden, could be she would have told the driver about the peculiar conditions of her motherhood - could be she was happy for being a mother in particular since nature could not have allowed for it by any other way. The Elisabeth Stopp? Chappaquiddick?

New teacher purely ascribed to smith-stopper's car[t] by author Sharebo (or 'car by author Thoursie'?): I think it was in the 6th grade in Molde that the main teacher Berge, who had been the 'mother' of the class and perhaps could be seen to have resembled Sachs a little (she had also been a christian missionary to Madagascar for several years), was replaced with a new main teacher. If only I could remember her name. Kvilekvaal was the name of Vibeke Gröver's teacher, but maybe she was my main teacher as well in the 6th grade - which would have been in the school year 1969-70. We lived in 'Moldeliveien' from the summer 1965, for one or probably two years - very close to the school Sellanraa. It is from that garden - we had eaten tomato soup or something like that - I recall Gröver/'Mengele' showing a 'panoramic' gesture with his hand while referring to de Gaulle's concept of 'gloire'.

Ragnar Söderlind laughed in the mid eighties about the possible source of norwegian/swedish misunderstanding in the word 'anledning': In norwegian 'to have anledning to talk with you' can mean to have the 'opportunity/possibility/chance' to talk with you (the word can also mean 'leilighet' = a 'flat'), while in swedish the same would mean that one has unfortunately not any 'reason' to talk with you. To answer an invitation with the formula 'ikke anledning' is polite in norwegian ('no possibility/chance' to come - which could mean that one has not the time = 'norge skit-ur' for the time being but hopefully some other time) while in swedish it is more like an insult ('no reason' to come, and the reason won't be there at another time either). Thoursie could not talk with me in the telephone but invited me to send him a letter and his wife gave me an address in 'Saltsjöbaden'. 'Vann-ledning' = 'waterway', 'canal', cp. '[C]anal Grande'. Ibsen's 'Vildanden' = 'the Wild Duck', cp. 'child Wuck' and 'JFK'. 'Ild-vanden' = 'fire-water' = 'alcohol'. (Is 'alcohol' a standard key word for 'secret service'? I am not a secret agent). I notice also the above form 'Petter is-enough' for the idea of a 'fish finger' in the anus of a small child for the concept of government via 'third eye' mutilation as a variant of nazi pederasty: It once occurred to me in a consultation by Per Mentzen that he was quite simply drunk (and nearly fell off the chair, it seemed) and I pointed it out and he said that he 'hadn't touched anything', a story which I told on to Vibeke Gröver.

1556 was the year of the most disastrous earthquake in known history, in Shansi in China, with some 7-800.000 dead, same number as in Treblinka ('jump-jarnegg-grover'), Verdun (Visthouse, Vistdalen, Stalin, Wiesenthal) and Rwanda. One guesses that the murdering in Rwanda in 1994 continued untill one had reached just this number. The two years 1444 and 1556 are symmetric around 1500 with the 'papal bulletin' of the Treaty of Tordesillas which divided the world in two hemispheres (Spanish and Portuguese) and for which the division line ran close to or over the Falkland Islands - hence the british war there. I notice the name 'Tordis' of the former wife of 'Ragnar Söderlind' with whom I had some lessons in harmony in 1977 after his name was mentioned by Ragna Gröver.

Is there a british intrigue on Thoursie's role or name relative to my book? I saw an ad for 'Handle with care' recently - cp. 'handle with car'. I do not want my book to become a handle-template for british 'culling' in verboten style.

A murder of 'Nono' on 'Zattere' in the 'parochia di San Trovaso' in 1990 would likewise have the function of indexing the rape of my authorship by Michael Noonan in his rejection of my 'Submorphemic signification' in 1995 - timed with the Oklahoma bombing - in such a way that it appears to turn the roles around for the impression that it is I who rape the authorship of somebody else. Which of course would have to mean that the role of Noonan is secondary - except for the fact that I had started the MA studies in january 1990 and then one could conjecture that I would come to write a book on some linguistic issue and then Noonan could be used as referee. That perhaps could be a reason for taking another look at this 'Bridget Jones diary' - for example one could believe that it could have been written with assistance from british secret service (whose general program seems to be swindle of historic documents - Tut-an-Kamin, Beowulf, Rosetta stone, Behistun, Dead Sea Scrolls etc). Then the Oklahoma bombing and the 'submarinic sinking' of Kursk could have served to reinforce this impression - for the general program of a british hijacking of the culture of the jewish-genetic diaspora. A murder of Nono could have been for precisely such reasons. Did the TV series 'Three witches' start after the Oklahoma bombing? Then it could have been about interests likewise related to a murder of Nono and the role of the Zattere Tiepolo.

In short, there is no doubt that there seems to be a very clear indexing of my birth, and a close connection between the death - if he were that lucky, I don't know how he died - of Luigi Nono and me. Unfortunately, this reference to Nono seems to recur for the recent January 2009 issue. Noise and Nostalgia. What are the ugly plans? I hope it is not about abducting somebody going there in the dark. From the 'Nono' house one can see over to the 'Fortuny' on Giudecca etc. 'Rudjord Kipling' etc. Rudjord in a boat? Billa[ncourt]-bo[lo]ng? That means that the issue could index the Modern Language Review stored in the library of the english institute on Zattere, between the house of Nono and the Tiepolo some metres further down, and a window was smashed recently (during the peak of the carnival, that is true - but the glass is thick and the damage was made with a pointed tool and some force must have been used if only a coincidental passerby should have added some weight to the window) in the copy centre close to the university which is the administrative centre for just that institute. One could believe that it could be the same representatives of british secret service - in which case it could be about just the same interests of hijack of my authorship. If MLR January 2009 indexes this institute with the MLR, and the window was smashed by a representative of the british secret service, it could have been for precisely the reason of the structure of my work as a 'novel-theoretic novel' the character which could have been discovered (if they are that advanced, which perhaps is not the case) after I worked out the parallel to the talmudic hebrew in november 2008: That would in fact mean that the smashing of the window (which is not so advanced) could have served to represent a british responsibility claim via Modern Language Review on the attack on Gaza in Christmas 2008. That would be because of this April 1957 issue - and it would serve to turn the roles around, just like a murder of Nono could have been about. It would serve to leave the impression that it was I who attacked Gaza, which only means that it would have served to be a hijacking of my discovery - a discovery which also could come to weaken the basis for the attack on Manhattan 2001 and other things which this complex may be about.

I sent 6 copies of my book "I tell you, Estunates" from Athens to London in 2008 but have got no receipt. I got an email from British Library telling that they considered it a donation and not legal deposit. One must hope the January 2009 of MLR is not about legal deposit issues.

In short, 'Modern Language Review' for January 2009 could have served to represent a british responsibility claim for the attack on Gaza 2008-2009. The issue would then have had to be planned since about mid or late november 2008 - in parallel with the planning of the attack on Gaza. 'Ariosto the lunar traveller' - could have been about me passing a 'camera' (= 'Pamela'?) for the general idea that this person is diagnosed with schizophrenia after 'third eye' treatment and hence the novel is written by some representative of british secret service. 'The long life' = 'the long Leif'? The issue of fatherhood on Zattere?

It is of course high time to close down the Modern Language Review and take the whole story up in full light. It should be more than enough material there for an international Nürnberg trial - a continuation of it after the discovery that Hitler and his government in fact worked on behalf of the british government. Which means that the british government must be taken to a continued Nürnberg process for war crimes and crimes against humanity. How many countries have got their intellectuals and politicians murdered by this at least 100-year old british project? That could be more countries than suffered from Hitler's brutal violence. A Nürnberg style process against England and the british government is certainly the right thing. That is a conclusion which can be reached on basis of the evidence in this periodical.

And that could be why they try to turn the roles with me via Noonan's rejection and a murder of Nono and Tiepolo on Zattere and much else.

Midori 1971

The nazis would perhaps claim that there is evidence in Modern Language Review even of a 'Mengele-chemical' basis for the talent of the wonderchild Midori: She was born on 25 October 1971 and the October 1971 issue of MLR contains elements which could point to her talent relative to mine. I had got a 'cigar box' violin (the 20 euro type) allegedly inherited from John Jensen in the late sixties, but in the early seventies I had lessons with 'Aage Wallin' (sounds like 'expensive violin') who should find a better violin for me and handpicked a socalled 'Anfinsen' violin: It was made by a violin builder called 'Anfinsen' in Inner Östfold and was of a 'rebuilt' type - and it had the peculiar property that the more I practiced on it, the worse it sounded. Pedagogically backwards, so to speak. '[h]An fiser' means 'he farts' and it could of course be that this could have been inherent in his choice of instrument - for example on basis of the role assigned to me in MLR. I got it in the course of the school year 1970-71.

Now the nazis may perhaps claim that they made the wonderchild Midori by way of 'Mengele methods' - as if they destroyed other talents by way of 'Mengele mistreatment' and pumped their talents over to her by way of nazi administration and administrative logic. The October 1971 can be used for supporting such a hypothesis that her talent is 'pumped over' from or by me, as would be the idea. Here are the titles:

1. Theme and structure in Middleton's 'A game of chess'. By Roussel Sargent
2. Problems of the middle style: La Fontaine in eighteenth-century England. By Rosamund G.Eland
3. Scott and 'Marmion': The discovery of identity. By John Pikoulis
4. Turgenev and George Eliot: A literary friendship. By Patrick Waddington
5. Two modes of possessing - conquest and appreciation: 'The princess Casamassima' and 'L'education sentimentale'. By P.R.Grover
6. Porpaillart in the 'Cycle de Guillaume d'Orange'. By M.J.Barnett
7. Towards an interpretation of the 'Conte de Graal'. By Helen C.R.Laurie
8. The function of Zola's Souvarine. By David Baguley
9. Symbols of motion and immobility in Gide's twin 'Récits'. By Elaine D.Cancalon
10. René Char, poet of contradiction. By Robert W.Greene
11. The underrated lyrics of Hartmann von Aue. By Paul Salmon
12. Notes on a preacher's repertory: Ambrosius Taurer's 'Bussruffer' (1596). By P.V.Brady
13. A questionable politician: A discussion of the ending to Goethe's 'Egmont'. By M.W.Swales

My guess is that this series of titles could be a detailed description of a 'letter' from the young 'brink-man', a letter on the bedside sheets to 'frau g-Röver'. Notes on a preacher's repertory etc. This is also what in theory later could have been the source for example for the choice of Bill Clinton as new presidential candidate. There must have been a reason for the closure of the car factor Rover in Warwick at the end of the nineties: 'Rover was closed down'. One can speculate that the young poet's literary works on the bedside could have been the source of much politics - and that could expectedly have been high-level international politics. That sort of story. It is likely that one has used the 'communication' on the textiles - for example for making a 'questionable' politician. I suppose one can find a highlevel politician if one searches the titles. What could 'M.W.Swales' mean? Simon Flem Devold was allegedly famed for his 'svelekaker', as Ragna Gröver told me, cakes of 'svele'. I have earlier speculated on these 'svele' relative to Venezuela. I see Microsoft Encarta tells that Hugo Chavez Frias (without me insinuating that he is 'questionable') entered the army in 1971 - and indeed one could, if one wants, read for example his name into some of these titles, which only means that if politics uses Midori for political intrigue, it is well possible that they really talk about Chavez or some other politician it could be - on basis for example of this MLR 1971. (I have earlier noticed the apparent indexation of 'Midori' by my stay in the psychiatric hospital in 1999-2000). But of course this is only one of the many hundred issues there have been of this Modern Language Review.

But there is no doubt that the titles in the issue for october 1971 also contains a certain reference to violin playing: Middlethon and Sargent ('sarg' is the curved side of the violin). The middle style of my playing as the 'Fontaine'. Scott and 'my harmony' in identity by the 'handpicker'. A 'game of cheese' on 'sargen'. Grover's article on the 'sentimental education' and the 'princess Casamassima', as if it were about me 'sawing' on the Anfinsen 'kasse' = 'box'. Robert W.Greene: The name 'Midori' means 'green', and 'Robert W' could perhaps mean 'Goto'. 'Salmon' means 'laks' and hence 'Paul Laks' = 'Bollacks'. The 'Bussruffer': There is a children's song in norwegian about 'Dummenikken on the tram' where (he was eating oranges) which this could be about: 'Saa kom konduktören, kasta'n ut av dören' = 'then came the conductor, threw him out the door'.

For which reason the nazis can point to Midori and say: "Ah, this is our product - she was made with the art of Mengele and administrative logic". But where is 'Osaka'? It must be here if that is the story. Could be 'Scott and' = 'Osaka'? Could be. But there is a reason why I still believe that this is the other way round - and why I think Midori is the memory in the historic consciousness of the meeting of mine with Celan on 3 September 1960: Celan is likely to have told me that he had the information from the french president Charles de Gaulle and that there was evidence also in this british periodical. Could be the french president had used it to support his information - and he could have added some other crucial examples from the same periodical, such as Hitler and the Dead Sea Scrolls which should suffice for proving that these were not jokes. He would not have let out such a high secret to the private person? Could be he would, on the background of the story. That is why the historic consciousness made wonderchild Midori as a memory of this meeting from 1960 - at the time when I was playing on that 'Anfinsen' instrument in 1971.

The evidence of this in on the front and back page of the 16th book in my TEQ - two photos which I took on 17 February 2008 in Athens. These two photos could not have been produced by the nazi logic of british administration. They correspond very closely to the two titles from October 1971, front and back:

Porpaillart in the 'Cycle de Guillaume d'Orange'. By M.J.Barnett
Towards an interpretation of the 'Conte de Graal'. By Helen C.R.Laurie

In addition, there is the "Symbols of motion and immobility" in that diary novel fragment which could have been the hypothetical reason for the israeli attack on Gaza - in my diary novel fragment this represents the concept of 'beauty' and even the timing interval in book 16! If Israel did attack Gaza on behalf of English interests, it would have been for precisely the reason of the idea of me as shown in 'Modern Language Review' that it be about GAS.

The reason why England could be worried about my book is that 'The discovery of identity' between my poetry and Midori's music is not based on administration but on the poetic logic in the whole work of 16 books in TEQ. There is no role for administrative logic in that 'discovery of identity'.

Crisis in science

There is one more thing which should be mentioned in this context, and that I have to mention myself since apparently nobody else would do it. Science in the humanities is in a state of complete crisis which probably is the same as the war against the intellectuals. There are probably thousands and thousands, or at least many hundred, articles of the type which one finds in Modern Language Review published every month, and most, if not all, serve such administrative purposes as this british terrorist program - a program which even could have used precisely this painting of Tiepolo - a painting of extraordinary beauty - for the purpose of representing administrative violence. An article such as mine with the comments on the 'etymological' poetic form in Tiepolo's painting in Chiesa SS.XII Apostoli would never have a chance in any of those journals - probably not in any existing journal at all, at least none which I know about. That is partly because it is not in the empty jargon which defines much paradigmatic science, partly because it contains something intellectually new (to put it unsuccessfully) which serves no administrative purposes and which thereby could endanger the piece of mind of administration. In a truly communist society, this sort of article could be written every day, but in the nazi world of the present day it is not printable at all. It contains hardly any conspiry-signalling form or jargon at all. In the form it has, it is likely to elicit aggression from nazis who want to claim that the last symbolism - the one about the ancient graffiti of BLAK SPAN - suppresses a hole in the bottom through which a flux of 'spiritual matter' comes through the 'ENDE', quite simply a 'fart' for which the origin can be traced to Modern Language Review April 1957. The problem is that such nazi analysis does not understand that it means precisely the opposite and that the art is to let the aggressive attack be - and then one can understand that it is not about any bottom at all. The interesting observation is that this 'coincidence' of old graffiti happens to meet precisely the etymological form which carries the poem of Celan and which even has a reflex in Mandelstam. The solution is not to attack the idea and it is not to start research network programs with graffiti. This is a singular event which has nothing to do with administrative logic. If Midori even serves to represent in the historic consciousness this meeting with Celan in 1960, nazi logic would say that 'Osaka, Japan' means 'the french president' who had told it to Celan, the very reason = 'osaka' for the travel, and then they would say that this is precisely what they themselves could have figured out and planned by 'administrative logic'. However, from a poetic point of view, this 'Osaka Japan' is more likely to mean just this 'blak[ende]s pan' = 'osaka [ja]pan' - the only thing of interest in the etymological study because it does not constitute a category.

Some conclusions

England has been running this war against the intellectuals for a hundred years or so - at least since 1945 - and it seems to be the strategy to replace or provide for the replacement of truth-oriented intellectuals with power-oriented british agents who write that sort of articles which one can find in MLR. I agree that the periodical is interesting - but that is as a historic document which can be used for proving this historic role of England.

The story is likely to be that britons have an unrealistic loyalty to their monarchy with its unilaterality - and try to construct the 'Kingdom' wherein people do not think but carry out acts the impulse to which which are radiated from the Throne.

Clearly England would have known since they started this program that the world would come to hate them for it - and then they constructed this 'funny' idea of a coming 'anti-s-britism' = 'anti-spiritism' = people's dislike of farts. Ah, there will come to be antispiritism in the world, like there has been antisemitism. Therefore they made me as born with the flag of a british-conceptual 'spiritual' being in the sense of a 'fart', for the britons to join the movement against the 'farty spirits'. This could also be the character of the union of England and (at least parts of) the US democrat party: The program against the 'farts', such as contained in the logo of Columbia Pictures. It is called 'anti-spiritism' and consists in the british war against the intellectuals, as if the intellectuals were 'farters' and the britons are part of the program against them.

It may be very late to stop this british program, and it may be that the world has suffered very serious damage from it. The attack on Gaza 2008-2009 could be another example of just this. I don't know why Gaza has got such a role in the story since 1948. Did England by Lord Rotschild give a land to the Jews for the purpose of making this parallel to the 'antispiritism' and for 'turning it around'? And would this be a part of or even the whole reason why the palestinians in Gaza are suppressed and the conflict kept going without a solution? If there is resistance anywhere against the british terrorist program - the israelis attack Gaza because of the problems of antispiritism? The official reason for the attack on Gaza was the role of Hamas.

Clearly if Israel or at least the role of Gaza is based on such a history relative to this Modern Language Review, one can only imagine the degree of unconstitutional power which can have been gained from building other political careers and structures by way of this periodical. Clearly there could be a basis of a new Nürnberg process there - possibly even relative to such things as this attack on Gaza 2008, at least to the extent that one can show a systematic role for this sort of unconstitutional power.

Is this concept of antispiritism and Gaza british concepts for the 'interface between mind and matter'? The 'fart' is 'mind'? It is not really about 'flatus' or 'wind' or things like that - gases emitted from the anus: It is rather about something metaphysical and mysterious which they call 'fart', as if it were a spiritual thing and not another form of 'matter'. Could be it is about the metaphysics of evil and the apparently deep mystery which takes place when evil is committed and people do not have a bad conscience and even think of doing it again. Could be that puerile mystery is not so deep but rather a matter of sociology. Why hasn't anybody stopped them? Could be that is the reason why nobody says anything.

It must be emphasized that the above discussion was based on a mistake as far as the receipt from Literar-Mechana is concerned: When I got the letter after two weeks I did search through the envelope but could find only one of them. Where was the other one? It would come in a separate envelope a few days later, I thought. It was as late as 26 February that I discovered that I had indeed got both receipts in the same envelope after only 2 weeks, while I had believed that I had got only one, and the 'holy wrath' I had developed in the mean time certainly had other reasons - the ones I have described in this article which I wrote after having got the envelope which appeared to contain only one receipt. Could be it was the abduction of Susanne Osthoff in 2005 (as if there should have been two of them and not only one such as I believed) for the concept of 'Susanne Quisling' or the death of Jörg Haider while MLR presented the 'Judas' article which made me analyse the elements of the story. One could believe that there were british interests behind the abduction of Osthoff and the death of Haider. Clearly there seems to be a very heavy load on the concept of austrian authors (Group 47, Bayer, Amery etc) which leads back to the essential Dead Sea Scrolls of 1947 - the authenticity of which probably can be taken to be proven false by way of Modern Language Review - relative not the least to current US politics. I suppose these are the real matters and Literar-Mechana would not be a part of the story. The abduction of Osthoff and a murder of Haider could anyhow have served to activate a very big political mill including the attempt on the pope, the space shuttle disasters and much else.

In fact there was an ad for a 'fastweb' service pasted up around in the neighbourhood in the evening when it is likely that the window was smashed in the copy centre close to the university - and the window looked like a 'web' which had been made 'fast'. If this means that it could be about a web or organized network which is activated very quickly after I have written something on my computer and the computer is tapped secretly and the material spread in the network, it could mean simply 'black seal up'. That could also mean that there could be secret tapping of the electronic equipment in the copy centre. It is likely that one must come to ascribe this symbolism to british secret service and their interests in Gaza. If 'Modern Language Review' January 2009 is about a camera surveying me, it could even have the function - possibly also in combination with the 'fastweb' idea - of claiming that camera surveillance can prove that I walked by that window in the evening and if in addition it is my authorship which is tapped and spread in the 'fastweb' the ad for which came up the same evening, the purpose could be to make it possible to prove that it was I who attacked Gaza after I had made the discovery of the hebrew parallel and wrote about it on my computer and this was spread in the 'fastweb' and that was reason for the attack. 'Henry Fielding' could then mean the fingertips on the keyboard - tapped by british secret service and forwarded to networks as 'intelligence data', in contrast to e.g. 'Helen Fielding' of the 'Bridget Jones diary'. The a 'black sea loop' mistreatment with 'Mengele chemicals' can turn the henry feeling into a 'hellen' feeling and thereby turn the authorships around. The novel by Helen Fielding is apparently of a rather simple-minded sort, as far as I could see from a quick look in a bookshop (not in a surveillance camera!), but of course that is not enough for an evaluation of it. It did not look 'lobotomized', though.

The military operation in Gaza was called 'Cast lead'. 'Castrate' would be about the 'scrotum' which is about a 'walking add'. Could it be that a new holocaust is planned to start from a program of 'fucking AT [= 'Austrai']'?

The conclusion to the discussion in this long article is that the 'Modern Language Review' (1906-) provides very substantial evidence for the theory that England - more or less in collaboration with (at least parts of) the US democrat party - are the main proponents of terror and fraud and the war against the intellectuals. It is a very big difference between this assumption as a vague hypothesis on basis of 'impressions' and the evidence which this british-national periodical provides.

The 'black seal up' is also apparently the contents of MLR July 1991: It seems to encode Gröver/'Mengele' giving birth to his gletscherous ouioui-nono colon 'cigar' = 'Gisele' after decades. The contents was 'Ngemele' = 'hemmeli[g]' = 'secret'. The 'glacier mummy' Ötzi was found in the alps on 19/9-1991, clearly an image of the cigar born from the gletscherous colon and hence probably another case of british swindle. 'Felix holt' on the front page is probably that 'glacier foot'. The MLR issue seems to constitute in its undertext coding a responsibility claim on Josef Mengele in the form of John Gröver - which suggests that he was an agent for England.

Or, simply, this means that England arranged the holocaust. I have not searched details on MLR's encoding of Hitler's activities in advance, but I would suppose that one can find crucial evidence of Hitler's agency in that periodical.

However, one can guess that if Josef Mengele after the 'death' of Gröver/'Mengele' in 1990 arrived at the secret service centre in London according to appointment (they have perhaps a specially equipped room there were the old agents can come and pick out the 'cigars' with much pushup and pushdown), he could have been met with a paper sign on the door: "Coming soon" - hungarian "rögtön jövök". The britons...

'Rögtön' can also be hungarian 'mindjart' - which would mean 'every Jar-T', every [= mind] person subsumed under a JAR connection.

From the 2007 version of this website: "Some analysis of the early morning meeting with Laura Devold Eidsvig in Fjellgata 72 in the sixties - it was cold and she rubbed her flatheld fingers against each other when she saw me - in the same way as Gröver/'Mengele' did after the Christmas dinner in the eighties when he told about the (probably fantasy) rumour of 'John Otto Haug' massaging a woman's breast for half an hour ('halt ime', cp. Russian 'ima' = 'name') - can suggest that she may perhaps have been up in Gorkij in 1924 after all. On behalf of the 'League of Nations', that could mean. 'Legg i ovnen, Asians'. It could theoretically mean that she shot Lenin, which could be one of the big orientation points for understanding this history if it is a fact. Hitler's postcard would then have been a responsibility claim from what could have been her later brother-in-law". Added here: Gröver/'Mengele's story was told very immediately after the Christmas eve dinner was over - people were about to leave the table and I think he was sitting with his back to the table when he told it. I am not sure if I remember right, but it was anyhow after the Christmas dinner - cp. Hitler on Christmas Eve 1957. I later speculated if the story was meant to contain remnants of the name 'Ehud Olmert'. Curiously, in MLR for October 1981, which could have been the relevant time, there are traces of the story in the title "'Effi Briest' and 'Die historische Stunde des Takts'". By Michael Minden. - This Minden could of course be the 'Mindjart' of the 'Rögtön' - could be even for a 'Jar connection' - told after the 'midrael'. There are other interesting titles in that issue as well, such as the 'upside down' of 'le chevalier de la charrete' which upside down to me looks something like 'I am hey babarooba' - isn't that 'Elvis' which upside down looks like 'Suez'? "'Phebi claro' by starlight. By A.D.Moody" etc.

One notices the obvious similarity of 'John Otto Haug' with 'Nowottny' above (under MLR April 1957 titles) and with 'Svein Otto Hofplass': 'John Otto Haug' backwards = 'guahottohnoj' = 'qua hat on hat' = 'qua Manhattan', while 'Svein Otto Hofplass' gives 'salpfohot on ievs' = 'saltpeter on jews'? The Oklahoma bombing was allegedly with a sort of 'saltpeter' solution - cp. the 'walking ad' phenomenon and 'klump-i-laar-halsen' for the 'halt' = 'limp' - and the 'corresponding' article in 'Language' (assuming that the bombing was related to the rejection of my book 'Submorphemic signification') credited 'Matthew Dryer' for good ideas. This could apply to the Mengele-Jensen relation. Finally, the MLR April 1970 suggests a 'Jean Bollack' reading on the form 'anje lock-ob': 'Lokk-up' = 'open up', as when one finds a sign 'back soon' = 'rögtön jövök' on the door. This again rewrites in a similar form to 'tönkör vököj' = 'tanker vök-öy' = 'thoughts fuck-eye' = the 'third eye' by laser beam on prefrontal cortex = 'Zola' in the MLR April 1957 issue. This gives a representation of all the three 'levels' of MLR April 1957 and it suggests that if my role has been to be a 'walking ad' for the nazis and Hitler and holocaust, then one can assume that rape in 1957 and chemical mistreatment of e.g. 1959 and third eye mutilation of 1975/1982 could have been the case. (I add that there was an occasion of a potential PASs in the Voldgaten atrium of possibly late 1978 - apparently a visiting relative of a neighbour, not Hofplass, though - which could have been a candidate for the mid point). The 'walking ad' structure would have been obtained by way of the rewrite of Bollack's name onto the April 1970 issue - which seems to indicate a tragic end to Celan's life. One notices the concept of 'force majeure' as 'Marjorie Shaw'. Manhattan 2001 could even have been about this 'John Otto Haug' backwards (he was chief doctor on the department of psychiatry in Fredrikstad when Gröver/'Mengele' was of the social medicine department). Another colleague of those, called Rygvold, was a specialist in intestine diseases and had an 'optic-fibre telescope', reading backwards, so to speak, and he was Gröver/'Mengele' personal doctor.

In short, one can find a 'walking ad' (cp. Challenger/Columbia space shuttles) in terms of mutilation of me for the idea of 'rögtön jövök' (for example Ingrid Betancourt) = 'mindjart jövök' which could be about a 'JAR connection'. I do of course not support any such policy. Clearly it could be important with an economic compensation to me for the mutilation if this is the story - in particular for getting my person detached from any such political program of a potentially persecutional character. But if that economic compensation were the 800 billion dollars given to US financial institutions - possibly those who have some significational affiliation with me - in the autumn 2008, this could even have been a part of the construction of a hypothetical 'Abr-Eham' phenomenon. Could be it would have been an 'Abr-Eham link-oln'. Could be 'walking ad' in the sense of 'fucking Austria' could be about plans for making a european 'third eye' out of the country.

Clearly my diary novel "The Dreamer" can be seen to have a background in this 'walking ad' role apparently assigned to me - and that could of course have been a part of the reason why I wrote the book - but then it would of course have been for making a better version of the 'walking ad' phenomenon: My book is not a 'walking ad' for nazism or holocaust but very much the opposite.

As far as the story about the attack on Gaza 2008-2009 is concerned, if it should have been an attack on behalf of England in order to hijack the results I had obtained in my work with the novel, it could have been very much the same sort of story as with Lenin's revolution which was hijacked by England - and many people in the west today believe that they are in the middle of the communist revolution while they looked with horror at Russia. Which means that if I present my material to Jews and they reject it as 'propaganda' or anti-jewish stuff, it could well be that such a rejection would be for precisely the reason that my thing has been hijacked by the israeli attack by which Israel thereafter can present itself under the banner of my work while I am thrown out of the story. In this framework, it may be permitted to observe that the 'jean bollack' rewrite of the name 'Ehud Olmert' gives 'ud-he mert-ol' which comes close to 'Jude-Mörder', and when 'e hu doll married' comes close to both 'Adolf Hitler' and 'Jean Bollack' (cp. also MLR October 1981 with 'rögtön/mindjart jövök' and Christmas 1957), and if the international secret service program on me is the identity of Bollack's role with mine - in addition to the 'walking ad' phenomenon which likewise tends to swap Hitler's role with me, then one can wonder whether Olmert's role could be about swapping with me - for leaving the stamp of 'Adolf Hitler' and 'Jean Bollack' and 'Jude-Mörder' on me. There is of course also the possibility that the function of Olmert is to have a name, and his name suggests that there is a link between Adolf Hitler and the use of the name 'Jean Bollack'. This could of course be taken to be of positive value for jewish interests if it e.g. should be the case that 'Jean Bollack' = 'Jude-Mörder' (the rewrite principle of 'Ehud Olmert' into 'Jude-Mörder' is the rewrite principle which derives from the use of the name 'Jean Bollack' = 'anje lack-ob' = 'Ancel-Sachs' = 'anglo-saxon', with british responsibility claim for their deaths in MLR April 1970) and this is consolidated everywhere as a secret principle of security and government, the name of Olmert could have the function of presenting such a newspiece along with the name of Adolf Hitler (a wellknown 'Jude-Mörder') without the state of Israel having leaked a secret at all, since Olmert has only been elected by normal democratic ways. And so the attack on e.g. Gaza could mean that this newspiece attacks the identity of me with the concept of 'GAS' = 'fart' = Hitler's agency for England for a tentative detachment of my identity from the real identity of Hitler as agent for England. The attack would - if this is the story - say that there is no such identity between me and Hitler's agency and that could serve the interest of the jewish-genetic diaspora, and so every Jew would be pleased with it. But that is precisely when I wonder why the embassy in Berlin did not answer my letter - or why my book is still without a publisher - since being unambiguous on the matter is exactly what counts most here. If the net result of the story should be that the attack is a way for England of hijacking my interests, then the eventual result for the diaspora could come out as precisely the opposite. If the political effect of the name of 'Ehud Olmert' is that it represents a split-off of the identity of Adolf Hitler with that other part it is glued to by way of MLR April 1957, then it could even be that the other part - which seems to be identified as me in that MLR April 1957 - comes to be recognized as 'Jude-Mörder' in the sense of MLR April 1970. And that is when the eventual interpretation could come to be that every Jew would be happy about the conclusion that there is one and only 'Jude-Mörder' - cruelly murdering the jewish-genetic diaspora - left on the earth and that is me. Why didn't the embassy answer my letter in 2004? When there was not answer (but there was an action for getting an antenna in, and I could not find out if that was the 'answer') I was driven out of my home and eventually out of Berlin and landed in Vienna and Ehamgasse. If the attack on Gaza could look right because it serves to split my (the jewish-genetic diaspora's) identity off from the historic mixmax, then it is of course of vital importance that the eventual result does not come to be that the identity comes to be recognized as that 'Jude-Mörder' which Israel attacked in Christmas 2008 - after I had made my discovery in november 2008. On such a background, one would expect to find that the israeli interests would try and make the diaspora aware of this situation and give them at least a hint about the importance of reading this website and it would be natural to find that an israeli or jewish-genetic-diaspora publisher - or even only a 'garage publisher' - would be interested in helping me publishing my work. But can I really expect to find that?

According to a swedish website which I cannot find again, the AIDSHIV epidemic was set in circulation with test vaccinations against Hepatitis-B in New York (november 1978) and Los Angeles and San Francisco (1980) on volunteering homosexuals. It has been claimed by Ingemar Kwame Ljungqvist - see, if that is still up on the web - that the virus originally was developed in a laboratory for biological warfare: "Blaming monkeys and chimpanzees for AIDS also conveniently obscures the possible link between the gay hepatitis B vaccine experiments (1978-1981) and the outbreak of AIDS in gay men shortly after the experiment began". The article, which said that all the early documented cases could be traced back to volunteering participants in those test vaccines - claimed that the firm which made the virus was 'Gallo & Essex' (hence representing a butterfly over the canal) and these also created the name AIDS/HIV of the epidemic. (This does not mean that Gallo & Essex made the virus, but it seems that the name could have been used by administration for indexing the phenomenon of the canal - and of course they could in principle have made it). Which means that it should be documented in MLR October 1978 if it were a case of british terror - supposedly for EIDSVIG. It seems to be:

1. The polarization of erotic love in 'Othello'. By Arthur Kirsch.
2. The identity of William Carlos William's 'Solitary disciple'. By Suzy B.Michel.
3. Tropes and blocks. By John Bayley.
4. Pascal's three orders. By Janet Morgan.
5. Reading Mériméé's 'La double méprise'. By Robert Lethbridge and Michael Tilby
6. Sacred and profane in L'Éducation Sentimentale'. By D.A.Williams
7. 'Literature' and the book trade in golden-age Spain. By D.W.Cruickshank
8. Hölderlin's Pindar: The language of translation. By David Constantine
9. The real mystery in Droste-Hülshoff's 'Die Judenbuche'. By Jane K.Brown
10. Toller and the Luddites: Fact and symbol in 'Die Maschinenstürmer'. By N.A.Furness
11. Vsevolod Meyerhold and the commedia dell'arte'. By C.Moody

Which means that if the first tells Aron Eidsvig and 'Gallo & Essex' ('girllove in othex' by author KSh = author X = 'Nelly X' = '8ell4'), the second could tell of the 'walking ad', the third the mirror-symmetry of blokes and drops. Did Celan take a taxi (drosje) to the hospital in 1960 for visiting the 'Judenbursche'? Or did he hop off the taxi about the dairy shop and went over the little hill down to the hospital? 'Droste-Hülshoff' could perhaps be a reference even to 'drops and blokes'? (One notices also the 'mystery' talked of in the last article of MLR April 1970 - the large Courtavenel in the Brie district which was levelled with the earth and not a stone remained of it - if it ever existed, but the article presents a map of the district and an arrow pointing to a room in the house). I never found out if there was anything strange about the meal in the early summer 1975, but must assume that it was normal meat in the brown 'sauce' (jenka?). 'La double méprise' = Hepatitis-B? The exposed breast on the Tintoretto in San Trovaso can be called a 'tilby' in norwegian. 'Toller' = 'customs' where Celan likewise could have been recognized. A moody C could output 'rommet de hadde lagt i / laget til' ('the room they had preparee / laid in / lakt in'). Paul Delan? If so, it could even be about a 'polarization' with my own 'bedsheet writings' in the early seventies. 'AIDSHIV' = 'I've shid', hence 'hveden' = 'klinten'. Ende-veden etc. Hence about 'couping his authorship' in a nazi sense of it. Cruickshank is the new name of my former official aunt Marte Eidsvig, which could be telling of Celan's aunt Bertha - a word which is sometimes used for the honk of a car (the taxi driver?) and for a woman who e.g. works in the secret service. One could guess that the historic origin of the AIDSHIV genocide would be in the visit of Celan to me in 1960 and that the few pieces of information one could collect thereafter (from interviews with the taxis, the guesthouse host, somebody who had left the hospital at just that time etc) can have been used for constructing the basis for the epidemic. If even the San Trovaso church in Venice is a background, would that mean that even the Baader-Meinhof (= 'Bachmann Ingeborg') group would have been formed on basis of those few pieces of information? Which means that if this group really worked for british secret service, it could constitute a british responsibility claim on the epidemic. The parametres could have been genocide, cannibalism (?) and pederasty - which could mean that if I would have been served a piece of human flesh at some time or other (just anybody that could have been), the epidemic could have served to leave the stamp of 'pederast' on Celan. This means that the 'genocidal' epidemic could be about swapping my role with Hitler's, and it could provide the butterfly which lifts the 'black-sealed' soul matter which has come from USA and Europe to meet in Paris over the canal to London. (My first piano lesson with Madsen was at Trara school but he did not show up, and the next time we met he asked me: 'Why didn't you come to the appointed lesson?' He also once came to Labråten in a taxi). Much efforts and research have been invested in WHO to find out where the epidemic came from. One theory (Microsoft Encarta) tells that it was found in a blood test from Leopoldville/Kinshasa in 1959, and I am sure they found it there in the blood test, in particular if it were by a piece of 'british scholarship', but I am not certain if the 'kneecaps' ('hasa' is the back of the knees in norwegian) of MLR April 1970 is a part of the story. Could it be about 'San Gervasio' = 'Sanger av Bjarne Eidsvig' (often with local patriot lyrics by Aron Eidsvig)? For HIV-2, a theory is that it came from 'makake' apes in Guinea Bisseau (San Protasio + San Gervasio = San Trovaso, cp. Arthur Kirsch - Arthur Nedregaard was a singer who also sang Bjarne Eidsvig's songs, and Gröver/'Mengele' told about 'the point of no return' after he had got the horse-size gebisso installed, as if it were about a parody on Shelley a la 'cigar') - not to be confused with the name of the once mate of PAS in the GAS-PAS-GAS construction ('Mörkhagen'). If so, it could be that WHO could be inclined to assign a responsibility claim to the GAS-PAS-GAS and thereby possibly the brief passing in the atrium of Voldgaten 1 in probably late 1978 or 1979. If this 'was Vienna', then it could be near-identical with a 'virtual being' of the Ehamgasse project. One could guess that it could serve to hijack on behalf of UK/US adminstration the authorship of 'Bjarne' and similars. Or is the story so incredible that Celan came to Odda and had to telephone to the custody parents for permission to talk with the 3-year old outside the house alone - and they certainly granted him that permission, but at the cost of this epidemic and perhaps the Baader-Meinhof group and much else? That would be the true character of british administration if the story is as crazy as this. Could be it is in any case even if he had not telephoned but found me alone outside the house.

Was the israeli incursion into Lebanon early 12 May 1970 a way of leaking the secret that Nelly Sachs must have been murdered about the same hour as Israel crossed the border, or was it quite simply a responsibility claim for the murder?

People never found out of Stalin - if he were a true communist or an agent for England. His name was probably 'Vistdalen' and hence Laura Devold (the opposite of 'Leonie Sachs' = 'Lenin') just like 'Wiesenthal' whose name likewise suggests that he could have been an agent for England who organized the holocaust, in which case Wiesenthal could have been an agent for the holocaust when he collected evidence against the nazis and stored it safely in his archive. He hunted some nazi fishes, but not the big ones if Hitler and Mengele went around in Klipra. Could be my november 2008 work was only in a maximally unfortunate timing with the israeli plans, but it is also possible that Gaza 2008 very simply was for hijacking it. It is not my point to prove any hijack - the point is to make people understand it as it is. If the main bulk of Jews today believe that Laura Devold represented jewish interests, then there are not so many chances left for the Jews on earth. This could also be why the visit to the jewish museum library in Athens left such a feeling of having made a mistake by going in there (after I had been into the reception in front of a surveillance camera the day before and they told me to come back the day after): There was this woman who stood there eating who resembled Laura Devold and I was told, as far as I remember, that she 'was' the library. I gave them my book and they promised me a letter of thanks but it never arrived. After I had left I had a feeling that I could be happy or even lucky to get out of the building. Which is when I wonder if Laura Devold - the very 'Klipra connection' and hence the name of the british interest who rescued the Jews from the death camps of Adolf Hitler - is the high star of jewish interests.

The name of 'Fanny Jefimovna Kaplan' - who allegedly shot Lenin in August 1918 - could have meant quite simply 'Modern Language Review'. It could have been what derailed the russian revolution - and still does. Then 'Laura Helene Devold's role in 1924 could have been to take over that indexation of the periodical - if it were not coordinated already in 1918. It seems that she was born in the year when the periodical started (October 1905 is the first issue), or the year before. The british periodical says about itself that it has been 'international' since 1918, whatever that means. The issue of Modern Language Review July 1918 contained the following articles:

1. The date of 'Love's Labour Lost'. I. By H.B.Charlton. (= LLL = L-aura He-L-ene Devo-L-d)
2. Spenser's 'Blatant Beast'. By Merrit Y.Hughes (= the host's 'beat and blast', by the 'why married twice')
3. Dryden's 'MacFlecknoe'. A vindication. By G.Thorndrury (= MacDonald's government)
4. A visit to the friends of Ibsen. By Edmund Gosse (= Nansen visiting Kalinin and Trotskij in Moscow in January 1923 along with Eduard Frick and John Gorvin)
5. De superbia carminum. By W.P.Ker (= Lenin's driver 'Gil'? the poisoned soup?)
6. Mallett's 'Histoire de Dannemarc' as a source of 'Han d'Islande'. By Beatrice C. Seth-Smith (= Hitler's postcard sent from hanseatic Hamburg in January 1924 when Hitler was in Landsberg prison)
7. Anglo-Norman poems in a Dublin Manuscript. By M.Esposito (= the wife Alexandra of bigamist Quisling as an agent for England - for the double role with Laura Devold in 1)

Even this is mirror-symmetric: 1-7 = the young female shooter Kaplan or Devold and 'copy' the passport of whom was likely to be the way Devold was smuggled in. The 'charleston' = 'knees-alter' dance of the twenties was introduced in New York in 1922, according to Microsoft Encarta. 'Knisalder' is the age of young women around the mid teens who cannot help laughing when there is something they find funny or teasing. Laura Devold would probably still be in her teens when Lenin died. 2-6 = the hand that held the gun = the report from the attempt in 1918 telling that somebody saw the gun in a hand but not the person herself. 3-5 = the one at the wheel (cp. also 'ÖVW', hands-on-wheel of Volkswagen), represented by the factor of the car and driver in the reports of 1918. 4 = the essential reponsibility claim of 'Nansen' = the 'kaudervelsk' of Hitler's postcard one year later for Nansen's close collaborator Quisling. Hence the MLR of July 1918 seemed to be an outright british responsibility claim on a murder of Lenin - and that could have meant, after the events of 1923-1924, that it was a british responsibility claim on Stalin = Vistdalen. But it is amazing, in light of the alarm of Lenin by the arranged Kaplan attempt pointing to this issue of MLR, that he had no chance at all in 1924 even if he must have got the news about the plans for a MacDonald government in 1924. Could it have been that simple soup story after all?

One must realize that the scheme of MLR July 1918 perhaps even could have been the background of an Ehamgasse project, including ÖVW = 3, Köck = 2 and so forth. Responsibility claim for ÖVW could have been in Gröver/'Mengele' taking me for a car drive to Veum psychiatric hospital in Fredrikstad with the apparent patient outside directing the traffic right and left - not so far from the place corresponding to the place where I would have met Celan in 1960. One even observes the financial crisis of autumn 2008 when Iceland went bankrupt and the 800 billion dollar bailout could have been a part of the construction of the 'Abr-Eham' 'monster' or 'blatant beast'. This beast seems to be on the form of a 'virtual being' - and hence a sort of 'married twice'. I had spent my Finanzierungsbeitrag and am still waiting for getting it sent to my bank account. See also the 'Thorndrury' for the intersecting 'Dommesgasse' - and maybe that explains why the garage door so often started to close apparently unmotivatedly when I went out the house, passing the 'camera', towards Dommesgasse. Even the dried-up stain of alleged 'beet-root' (cp. the 'betrothed') on the wallpaper in the 'Abstellraum' is present in Dryden's 'MacFlecknoe' - as an inside wallpaper phenomenon as a parallel to the outside surveillaince camera. Hence the 'Banda Aceh' (= 'Black Sea'?) quake after I had signed the contract: It is about the derailing of Lenin's revolution. Could be this MLR July 1918 suffices for proving the reality of the 'Ehamgasse' project - and one could guess that it has been planned for starting the Black Sea Loop in Europe - by way of 'walking ad' = 'fucking Austria'. I think some political efforts should be put into getting my Finanzierugsbeitrag sent from ÖVW to my bank account. That could prevent the outbreak of this Black Sea Loop - which could come to be a horrendous disaster on the scale of the holocaust 1933-45. I think the Jews should not invest all their confidence and future into trusting the israeli government. Could be the three letters that were not sent - from the Berlin embassy and the libraries of Athens and Prague - are not enough for concluding with certainty that the israeli government works on behalf of the british interests (including 'Vistdalen-Wiesenthal'), but the policy of ambiguity is always alarming and cannot be understood in any other ways than concealing intentions.

One notice also the 'Ehamgasse' relative to 'Giambono' = 'jambon-o' and the 'San Antonio' = 'jamdoni-o' for 'an dre-as B a D-er'. The turning San Antonio is next to the 'Giambono' and it seems that if San Antonio had lived in a flat surveyed by modern surveillance equipment, he could have been caught in the act of alleged masturbation or something similar. Politics is easy nowadays, and statesmanship can be acquired for a small sum. Giambono, San Antonio. The tenants in the house masturbate like San Antonio and the houseletter follows it on camera like Giambono.

Ehamgasse could thereby be an extended version of AIDSHIV as a way of couping the jewish-genetic authorship by way of a 'virtual being' which is lifted over from Paris to London.

The point with this Ehamgasse Black-Sea-Loop could be to imitate the situation of the lonely Lenin who could not prevent the murder even if he knew about it as early as 1918. Look at him on that photo with Stalin in 1922 - he could not be sitting there like that if he knew in 1918 that Stalin was an agent for England and (consequently?) planned to murder him. But this is precisely what the 1918 attempt could have been about - a way of telling that this could have been the contents of that MLR July 1918 and he could not tell it in any other way than by the arranged attempt since he could not know it with certainty and the intelligence he could have received - that Stalin was an agent for England and the responsibility claim for it was printed in MLR July 1918 - was bad news but could still have been an anti-soviet intrigue from England. He asked in the process against Kaplan that her life be saved and I think she was even released from prison some time later. Most analysts after 1924 would, though, probably be inclined to conclude that he was not murdered at all - on the contrary many analysts are probably inclined to believe that he was an agent for England and stated the responsibility claim for the british hijacking of the revolution by way of Kaplan and MLR and pulked to London in January 1924 - or at least he pulked for preserving the ideal of a revolutionary communist for a resurrection in the future and let Stalin run the failed revolution to its end in the mean time - and a copy was placed in the mausoleum. Which is when Stalin's hijack could have been successful indeed. On the background of this, it could have been the planned basis for an Ehamgasse project as the basis for a 'black sea loop' of verboten kind that the lonely being who is driven off to Dr.Verboten cannot understand anything of it before the moment when he slips out over the threshold to eternity - and understands the whole story when it is too late to tell the others about it.

The phenomenon of 'black seal up' would be the purpose of such a verboten persecution - the single individual who indeed is the loneliest person on earth when the 'seal' of the soul is broken up and the contents spread in the collective consciousness and pumped over to London. That could have been the purpose with a 'Kanaan' signification as part of the program of 'fucking Austria' since one cannot find out of it with modern computer surveillance technology. Even the attempt on the pope in 1981 could have been a part of this 'walking ad' program. And then it is apparently the indexation of my birth in MLR April 1970 which is the background for the 'walking ad'. This could even have been a backgound for the death of president Klestil in Austria when I went to register my address there in early July 2004 - and Haider in 2008 as the other side of the 'walking ad'.

I think the britons should start realizing that they have no right to behave like they have done through many decades. When the story is 100 years old, it is not likely that the britons can tidy up in this themselves, but they could of course try. 'Röntgen Fuckyou' instead of the social depth in Tiepolo's painting on Zattere or the high metaphysics in the Apostoli church - that is what the britons can offer, it seems. It is very long since Shakespeare was up and going.

The incredible thing is that people do not say anything. It seems that one can come to establish as a historic fact that Adolf Hitler was a secret agent for England and therefore that England organized the holocaust - they were 'the ultimate organizers of the holocaust' - and this is something which the state leaders of the world must know very well and nobody says anything. The state of Israel was probably lost after 10 minutes when they had not yet told this fact to the world: It is not about 'security reasons' and things like that - this is something which the world has a right to know at any cost. And therefore, when nobody says anything, it means that the 'heads of state' of 'this cold world' accept the conditions and agree with british policy and there is not a single state left around where the leadership is not in interest-conflict with their own people (cp. the people of 'ice-real'). This leads to a 'total corruption' (in the body of Ötzi, as this seems to be about) and the formation of a 'new corrupt upper class' (a new head? or was the old one torn off when they tried to pull him out of the ice?) which inevitably comes to consolidate its own power at the cost of truth by way of international secret service. Which means that the corruption rather is in the international secret service or its headquarter - 5000 years is quite a lot of time - not necessarily in the central committees of the smaller political parties. The idea corresponds to the model of a british crown under which there are globally loyal state chiefs whose heads are authentic or not, and the fact that the truth of the postwar Adolf Hitler is not told thereby tells of the overall loyalty to the british administration. A 'brev-andrer' could also be an inherent reference to a letter sent to me from Sachs if she visited me in Volda in the first half of September 1964 while she officially was in the meeting with Group 47 in 'Sigtuna' near Stockholm - about the same distance as from Ålesund to Volda. 'Sig Tuna' = 'say Tone' is a possible interpretation on the background of the birth of Tone Gröver 9 months after Sachs and Celan met in Zürich in 1960, while the secret service interpretation would have been 'sigt unna' = 'direct your gun elsewhere' (and could have been the background of e.g. the alleged shooting of John Lennon, for which reason one would guess that it was a pulk only, after his 'comeback', I think with 'steel and glass' etc). She could have taken a morning airplane from Arlanda to Vigra (if there were any such) and with a taxi she could have been in Volda in the course of less than 3 hours from Stockholm and met me on my way home from school and been back in Stockholm in the evening or next day. (I would have started school a few days earlier, in late august 1964 - it was called 'Øvings-skulen' = 'training school' for teachers - it was a school for training pedagogues who were sitting in the back of the class with notebooks and followed the teaching, and sometimes the students practiced as standins. Cp. 'Ø-vings-kulen' = 'the Ø-wing bullet' for the 'gun directed elsewhere' - one notices also the name of 'Maria Owings Shriver' and the 'Sigt-una' theme). Which means that if she had to buy the ticket in advance, or maybe even in any case, they would have known it and if the teacher of the class was in contact with the secret services, which perhaps is likely on the background of this story, she could have talked about the meeting before I left school. 'Bell' is likely to have been the codeword - hence the story of the princess of 'Belgium' ('bell-gå-hjem' = 'bell-go-home') and the revelation in Vilnius. (Alexander Graham Bell - cp. 'Gray Eham' - is credited with having invented the telephone, but it seems that Elisha Gray invented it first but Bell was the first to register a patent for the invention - I don't know if that means that Bell simply stole the invention or if the patents office was corrupt and delayed the registration while Bell got a copy of it and registered his own patent first or what was the story, but it could add to the cluster of meanings around the Ehamgasse complex. I notice the story with the manuscript apparently stolen from my computer in 1995/1999 - and the only source credited in the Oslo Report was the Bell journal). From Vigra to Ålesund there is a ferry and a taxi from Ålesund would have had to include the harbour environments - for which reason one can conjecture that if she went to Volda for meeting me on my way home from school, it is likely that she would have passed Aron Eidsvig on the way from the boat to the taxi. Gröver/'Mengele' told me that Nils Devold was a genius of languages (I think it was him he talked of, not 'Abr-Eham' with his hebrew) and 'sveiva seg i hjel på brygga' ('cranked himself to death on the pier/quay' - cp. the 'Cruickshank' and 'Piers Plowman') when he tried to start a car. Nils Devold was probably the brother or uncle of Laura Devold. Could be Gröver/'Mengele' meant Laura's brother-in-law (or could be Adolf Hitler was her real uncle?), and in any case this 'nil sted-vold' = 'no place-violence' could have meant the 'Sigt-una' theme. Clearly this meeting on the harbour would have been virtually inevitable if Sachs would go to Volda, and therefore this joke about 'Sigt-una' = 'Sig Tuna'. This story could even have been the background of the AIDSHIV epidemic - if that is assigned a significational locus in the 1444 'Giambono' with facial similarity with Ragna Gröver, including the apparent 'car crash' of 1981. Hence the VAS. Cp. the venetian 'Vaporetto'.

But if both Sachs and Celan went to meet me, it would have been with a 4 years interval (early september 1960, early september 1964). The new postal codes were introduced on 12 May 1968 and Sachs died and Celan was buried (after having disappeared on Hitler's birthday 20 April) on 12 May 1970.

This means that 'Ehamgasse' could be about the jewish-genetic culture running together from east and west in Paris and from there be lifted as a 'virtual' Abr-Eham by AIDSHIV butterfly over to London, where it turns out that the old patriarch was Adolf Hitler! The Visthouse butterfly was in terms of the names Guy Freemantle and William Lawson which butterfly to Guy Lawson = 'the key in the lock' and William Freemantle = 'the opening door'.

Esso and Galaxe? "En nisse skulle pisse men så hoppan over gjerdet åsså pissan på en pære" is a traditional norwegian children's rhyme from at least the sixties in Ålesund, or maybe it is invented for this story. Reinhold Messner, the famous climber who according to Microsoft Encarta has been on all 8000-metres (his climbing career seems to have started probably not long before Celan 'threatened' - 'truet', cp. the 'truite' - his wife with a knife on 24 Nov 1965), was one of the first to inspect the glacier mummy 'Ötzi' and later allegedly hurt his foot badly when he tried to climb over a fence in his home garden. "En brite skulle drite..." See the Giambono painting with the horse which is no female ('hoppan') - it is a male horse indeed - and it is a mistake to take its sensitive facial expression for a female - that could rather be about taking the male Crysogono for a female 'frau Röver'. The vikings were an example of a people who hardly gave up their terror and had to be put under danish administration for 400 years before they were liberated by the renewed 'spirit of independence' in 1814 with their anti-semitic constitution. If the Dead Sea Scrolls and Beowulf and much else is british fraud - the Diplomatarium, for example - what can one say about the icelandic sagas and the documentation of the vikings? Did they exist at all? Or were they invented by 'scribleruses' ('Snorri Sturluson' could even suggest the 'feather' with the 'thread' = 'snor' of the Tiepolo Madonna on Zattere, who then looks a little 'dirty', in contrast to e.g. the source 'Flateyjarbók' - source Microsoft Encarta) in the 18th century for the british program with 'Stonehenge'? 'Ganesha' = 'han Edda' - not me, I hope? Could be that is what Lenin should have told in 1917-1918 - if the icelandic sagas really are penned by britons in the 18th century - and then the revolution could have continued. Iceland was, according to these legends, once relating to Norway like Norway later related to England, cp. the later 1-2-3 to Israel. And Ireland next to England - not to speak of northern Ireland! One must believe that if the source material to the sagas had been produced in England in the 18th century (for example for making the 'dritte Reich' of Israel), this would be testable with Carbon-14 and should have leaked out in any case, although Beowulf seems to be taken seriously. "En brite skulle drite..." could be about 'Laxdöla saga' if it continues "men så hoppan over fjæra ['the feather'] åsså dreitan på en döle/jöde". In which case it could be about another case of the name of 'Jean Bollack's.

Such ideas could be tragic for Iceland, of course, if they have a rooting in reality. It would probably have been for a longtime project on claiming the traditional jewish Torah for swindle and for presenting a better 'british' alternative. The newspiece that the icelandic golden era as a peak of world literature in the late middle ages could have been swindle could be enough to make a substantial portion of icelandic self-esteem crumble - and if that is the other side of Israel in a 1-2-3 ladder, it is likely that much could have been obtained relative to the diaspora by way of politics which addressed essential aspects of the swindle. This could even have been a part of the formation of militant zionism in the late 19th century - if the feeling, although not the fact, is that Moses could have been swindle. And it would be somewhat tragic even for Norway if the glorious past reduces to a potato culture and a few national costumes - the 'battle of Stiklestad' or 'Magnus Lagaböter' as a preparation for the Ö-streicher Adolf Hitler? - - but I suppose Olaf the Holy is well doocumented in the Vatican. When Iceland went bankrupt recently around the time of the bailout of the 800 billion dollars, it could also have been about modelling the end of the golden era and the story of Elisha Gray and his telephone invention. Could be the plan is to declare all the old icelandic saga stuff for british iceland nonsense (Fridtjof Nansen's - was even this explorer an old briton?). In which case one could look up Celan's letter to his wife of 14 September 1964 from Kassel - he had stepped out on the railway station and had just put his suitcase into the luggage store when he met Hilde de la ['döla'] Motte, and they have a 'truite au bleu', he writes. Could be this 'truite' = 'örret' or 'aure' was the background of the 'Aure-Osen' story for the french connection from the late sixties. The timeline in the published correspondence of Celan with his wife tells under 5-6 September 1964 that Celan on this day wrote a poem called 'Le Périgord' dedicated to Mayotte and Jean Bollack for his 'Atemwende' but took it out again. (Bollack seems to be the source of the information that the poem was dated 5-6 August and takes it as an error). The Bollacks and Szondi had, according to Celan/Szondi correspondence, visited the Celans in their summer house at the end of August 1964 wherefrom they went for a trip to Baneuil and stayed probably for a few days in the summerhouse in Le Périgord belonging to Mayotte's parents. It seems that Bollack could be the source of this unedited Celan poem which he seems to have written some days later - the timeline and Wiedemann's edition of his poems refers to "Jean Bollack, Pierre de coeur, s.l., Pierre Fanlac, 1991, and GN, p.96 and 393-396", but Wiedemann adds that a copy of the poem was found in an envelope for 'Die Niemandsrose'. 'Löper i går' = 'runs yesterday' or even 'walks running-quickly' - but, as this suggests, walks today but ran yesterday, which could suggest 'stöl' = 'stiff in the body'. Hence 'Lac-stöla' saga? San Bernardino (not 'bell-narr-dino'!) is a centre of spacecraft industry - I don't know who was credited with the shuttle disasters. See MLR October 2007 above ('Bernardin de Saint-Pierre and Girodet') for 'Benazir Bhutto', although the legs are perhaps not as quick as before if they are 'stöl'.

One naturally constructs the idea that when Celan nearly attacked his wife with a knife on 24 November 1965 (37 years before the death of 'LSJ'), that could have had a background in the unfortunate placename of late August 1964 if Sachs went to Volda to meet me on my way home from school, and 'Le Périgord' could have suggested that I should hurry quickly past the schoolway person, for example since it could have been a 'copy' or something like that, a 'challenge'. (I remember a dinner in Volda with Gröver/'Mengele' opening a meatball made by a hired house-maid and exclaiming: "Look at this! It is full of fat!" - as if it were a piece of evidential tissue - and I think the house-maid - not made in Hong Kong - was fired - I don't remember when this was). But I don't think I attacked Celan's genitals in 1960 either, even if that seems to be another constructed idea. Clearly the categorial interface to the Gröver family would have been difficult. However, this link between 1964 and 1965 can be constructed, and perhaps one could insert an idea of 'Esso and Galaxy' for a sort of interrupted 'SOS' if one did not have the time to hurry quickly to a toilet but 'did it in the pants/furs' = 'gjorde i pelle' ('en brite skulle drite') even before the SOS was over. These are of course strange ideas which have nothing to do with reality but one could perhaps recognize a certain taint of political intrigue. The poem 'Le Périgord' starts with the line: "Wohin, mit Wacholdersporen" wherein 'Wacholdersporen' perhaps could be identified as 'Einar Berhardsen' - and 'Einar Gerhardsen' was norwegian PM at that time. Celan seems to have developed some psychiatric problems in the course of 1965 and when he threatened his wife with a knife, it could have meant that he could not know with certainty if it was her or a 'copy'. One notices the name of 'John Paul II' relative to 'Jean Bollack' and the attempt in 1981 - as if I should have attacked Celan's genitals in 1960 and run past Sachs in 1964. 'Ali Acqa' resembles 'alias, ka?'.

When my book submission in 1994-1995 to John Benjamin's was rejected in concert with the Oklahoma bombing, that was of course for the purpose of 'preventing a fart' from leaking out: That 'fart' is the newspiece that Hitler was an agent for England, and everybody agree that one must prevent this newspiece from leaking out? Then the conclusion could be tempting that there is not any decent honest political party left on the earth (Nono was in the central committee of the italian communist party - which does not mean that he pulked in 1990 even if John Lennon could have pulked ten years earlier), and when the US democrats and/or security bureaus borrow my role (for example by the 'submarinic sinking' or illegal borrowing of my manuscripts) it looks right to many people because it looks as if they are pressing on for getting the essential newspiece out while in actual fact they only dress up as walking ads for a new holocaust. A politician must sometimes choose between the alternatives of 1000 dead or 2000 dead and then naturally opts for 1000 dead. This policy could in fact be quite comparable to the one of Olmert by his name. And while this situation continues year after year, the 'holding of the fart' makes it look more and more as if I am the fart and not Hitler. It looks more and more like every administration on earth heartily welcome the british program of Hitler and holocaust. That is also why Olmert attacking Gaza could look right to Jews while in actual fact it could come to be a catastrophe in the sense of being an attack on the jewish-genetic diaspora organized from England and endorsed by the state of Israel, even with a rather massive support from not only the government but even the people of Israel. That disastrous attack could mean just that attack of administration on a single lonely defense-less individual facing the terror of Dr.Verboten. Even Lenin as the leader of the russian revolution could not escape.

The conclusion seems to be that the discovery of this role of Modern Language Review constitutes major progress in the sense of being what resembles decisive evidence for the role of England in the history of nazism and it could be what allows people to stop talking gas. The Nürnberg processes must be taken up again and the british government must be accused for the organization of the holocaust 1933-45. If not, there are very substantial dangers that they could plan to do the same once again. My own personal history could be telling: I could not leave the Gröver/'Mengele' family without a goodenough reason - I believed that I was a most normal person from a most normal family and the social convention is that the family is a basis for a wellfunctioning society and one cannot just leave the family behind only because one 'does not like' the folks there. Why should I have left the family? They looked like ordinary people and I could not point to any serious mistreatment of me in any way - childhood mistreatment I could not remember consciously and school dentistry had 'medical reasons' and I cannot remember what happened under GAS narcosis and bacillae are around everywhere and if the agents are secret you don't know who they represent and certainly if the dimensions were as they could have been somebody would have told me if the family did not tell me - and so forth - and so if my contacts with the family did not really lead to much progress for myself it had to be my own fault. One needs a better reason than just 'not liking people' for leaving the family - and that 'liking or not' is a question which one does not pose in a family environment. People don't ask themselves if they like the family or not. If I had got such a goodenough reason at an early stage, I would have been out of the family decades ago and the work with this website would have been completed long ago and I would not have wasted so much time with trying to get the story by the tedious and time-consuming method of putting two and two 'coincidences' together. It was in the late seventies that I was told that 'randsydde' shoes were more lasting and hence economic than other shoes (such as e.g. 'pumps'). There are many small memories and trivialities and trifles in a life which could aspire to the status of telling coincidence and where could one start? The 2007 version of this website contained some 3-4000 book pages of collected coincidences and I could not know where to start because nobody said anything. It was only with the turn of the millenium when there was no chance to avoid the conclusion that I had to start making the conclusions myself, and now it is closer to 2010 and I have eventually, after a lot of work, come as far as this MLR which is something indeed. I can read a contents overview of such an issue and spot the reason why it is telling of a political intrigue - which could qualify the british government for a Nürnberg trial - because I have done all that work of sorting 'coincidences' - but it is a scandal indeed that nobody else has done this before me. It has cost me a decade of wrong interests. Somebody should have told me these things many years ago. I suppose that is the conclusion which the jewish-genetic diaspora can come to reach also: Why didn't the state of Israel tell them? It is unfortunately possible that this question could come to resemble the one I had to pose through all those years: Why didn't the Gröver family tell me if it really were as bad as this? This question of course looks ridiculous today, and it may well be that the same question about the Israeli administration can look just as ridiculous in some decades' time. That is why I tell it now. They tell it confined in their own closed circles of secrecy? Well that is of course the most efficient means of intrigue and conspiracy one can find.

The administrations apparently become more and more violent and consider it more and more natural and everyday to murder by the calendar and name in order to install their activities. That would be the british-nazi solution after WWII. And people believe that it is the other way round. Which means that the sense of humanity become blunted and if there is no call for a role for the conscience after all that murdering, it is because nobody told the story about Hitler and Eidsvig and the essential fact that Hitler was an agent for England. There was an enormous relief and joy all over the world in the summer 1945 when the news came that Hitler was defeated. People could not know that WWII was only the beginning. Murder is today apparently a very widespread administrative tool and the AIDSHIV epidemic has probably claimed more lives that the two world wars in total. That is because nazism tells that murder = power and that is apparently the british way: Power before truth, swindle before facts. Only the future can guess what can be found of old english treasures in the basements and caves of England - after all the ancient sagas and Plato and Aristotle and all that has been discarded as 'swindle'.

Jean Bollack edited (translated, commented on) Empdocles in the sixies.

The revelation in Vilnius is telling of this story from Volda 1964. There was another revelation in Vilnius: It seems to show the face of Lenin in a stone wall. Why is he weeping? Because the communist-poetic revolution was hijacked because it could not be carried through in only a part of the world - since that could lead to a constant infiltration by british agents who would turn it into a nightmare of suspicion and conspiracies which never could get beyond the proletariat's dictatorship. For which reason the communist revolution would have to wait while it was couped in UK/US where there was talk of the 'commies' and McCarthyism pronounced a doom on what they tried to hijack. Today the political program nearly everywhere seems to be the big thought that one has to let terrorist politics understand and get tired of itself: For example, if England has murdered for the sake of power before truth for a hundred years, there is not much self-esteem left in the country and the culture will look accordingly, and sooner or late they will have to get tired of themselves and cannot take more terror against other people. Therefore the grandiose project seems to be to let the terror and fraud try and stop itself. Could be that is the only way forwards to revitalize the revolution which was interrupted by the impossibility of running it in the west. But then it could be that Lenin's tear is about the tragedy of what happened with poetic cognition in the mean time: The tear looks like a sausage which means that Midori was born in Osaka, Japan, because she represents the memory of Celan in Odda - or even Sachs in Volda - and the country looks like a sausage on the map and hence like a 'french president'. The muse likes sausages and therefore the poetic communication? That is british-nazi 'poetic logic', and that could be the same 'logic' as was behind the attempt on the pope in 1981 when 'Jean Paul' passed in a second on the schoolway, and then there is not much left of the real poetic purpose with the revolution. The problem will be if this sort of thinking develops into a new form of logic which comes to be consolidated before the poetic revolution can continue. See the study of etymological form and Sachs' first poem from her 'Glühende Rätsel' for a better interpretation of this Osaka, Japan - and a better understanding of the poetic logic in the relation between muse and poet.

One notices also the structural similarity between the Bollacks relative to Celan with the Holmqvists relative to Sachs. By a closer look, one finds that even the name Bengt Holmqvist is present in the rewrites of MLR April 1970: Bengt Holocaust and Venk/Meng Tolocaust etc: Mérimée/Vérivée vs. 'Venise Sauvée' = Vérivée + Sisson. Mek Nonocost, MacDonald etc.

I hope I am not the 'chegue-ware' of today. I do in any case not carry 'cigar', and if Chomsky's mind/matter issue relates to the vibrating colon-anus for me in MLR April 1957, one observes that 1) gas emitted from the anus is matter and not mind, and 2) it doesn't make it more spiritual to have an identity code for the 'address' stored in a hermetic 'cigar' container there.

If there is resistence to for example the publication of my work, or to the presence of my person, that is likely to be traced to the MLR April 1957 which indexes me as that 'fart' which escapes an anus with vibrations and which consists in the newspiece that Hitler was an agent for England: When England invites other countries to participate in the blocking of the 'fart', for preventing it from leaking out, that is to invite them to participate in the spread of the british nazism. The strategy is likely to be that one is told that my authorship is a fart called 'nazism' and one must prevent it from leaking out. The rest of the story is told here: The fart is - as can be read from MLR - the british organization of the holocaust via their secret agent Hitler and they don't want that newspiece to leak out. The fart can be blocked also with a little piece of broom - a sort of 'wooden sausage' shape - 'sossiss' as it can be called - for example for zwischenlanding in london on a maiden voyage: 'Made in Hong Kong'. The last issue of MLR has some mention of the 'venetian diaspora'. 'Legal deposit'. A brief of Poon?

One notices also the 'hyle ridiculous' (for 'Hilary Clinton') for 'form ridiculous' (could somebody please give me that little piece of information which I have called for repeatedly?) which could resemble in meaning the form 'jean bollack', and then one can notice also the 'foam' of 'fuktig med skum' (cp. also the neighbour 'Forsberg' vs. 'Skundberg' in Labråten) - which also could be the pier or quay environment when the 'u' is high enough: 'Skummel med fukt', which also could be about 'rönken fökyö'. And if 'Bill Clinton' should be the 'reason', then I may add that it is not I who is going to pay for Manhattan 11 September 2001: That must be paid by those who stole the manuscript and used it for modelling the attack on 'YSA' - if that is what happened. And that seems from the data discussed here to be a likely explanation. The obvious visit on my computer on 22/11-99 need, on this background, not have been the first and it may well be that the manuscript was stolen already in 1995. It could even have been registered for copyright by some 'security bureau'.

It was probably in the autumn 1973 or perhaps early 1974 - probably not 1972 - that I was in contact with Olav Skundberg in Rislökka in Fredrikstad. I recall a 'third man' there, a friend of Skundberg whom I sort of associated with USA, for whatever reason, who in Skundberg's rebuilt car port structure used the expression "en fuktig en med skum" ('a humid one with foam') with very fronted high rounded U-sounds. He laughed surprisingly about it and also presented a violent story which scared me a little - a story about some rural districts where fist-fights included protruding long finger joint for hitting with lasting effects - thereby alluding to 'finger in the celestial eye' - he even told it with a sort of suggestive gesture which I did not like - so there was an element of something unknown to me - political interests or whatever. It could be a joke on the name of the host 'Olav Skundberg', but he seemed to be unconcerned about it.

Vibeke Gröver once - seventies or eighties - told about how John Jensen's parents Sigurd Jensen and Inga Olsen met: Jensen was on his way from Lofoten to Bergen for selling fish - typically skrei and hysa (skrei is the [holo]-cod caught at the coast far up in the north close to where the finnish border is 'sewn' to the norwegian, while 'hysan' is not to be confused with 'Lyssand' etc) - and zwischenlanded in Ålesund where Olsen stood on the pier. The next day he went down to Bergen and sold his fish and on the way up again he once again zwischenlanded in Ålesund and there stood Olsen pregnant on the pier. Could it have been about GAS-PAS-GAS? I notice the 'passport' of Pawel Biedgo in Vilnius - and the phonological similarity of 'Bill/William Dilton' with 'Pawel Biedgo' as well as 'bilde inten'. It is the only passport in the documents related to Anton Weiss in WWII Vilnius.

Clearly if the Clinton[s] were involved in the attack on USA in 2001, it must be classified as a sort of abnormal behaviour. The above data suggest that it could have been a case of 'auto' pilots (although some of the arab passengers who had been into the airplanes were blamed for the hijack). Romanticist reasons a la Bonnie and Clyde or Baader-Meinhof (hopefully not the despair by seeing the power get out of hand) wouldn't make it better.

'Fred i olesen' = 'peace in the oldie' one can get by plugging it with a little broomy 'sausage', and that prevents 'vred i olesen' - 'wrathful in the oldie' = 'sue them oldies' - from slipping out. One notices 'Alan Osler' in the list of article titles for MLR April 1967 where one also finds the photo of Sisson, cp. the photo of Biedgo. The impeachment of Clinton was allegedly for some kissing and fumbling ('fumbles' = 'fo[a]mles') with Lewinsky - called 'klining' in norwegian, past (or even PASsed!) tense 'klinten' - not for a later attack on Manhattan. HR is norwegian abbreviation for 'the high court'. One cannot consider the impeachment of Clinton with acquittal a process in advance - for example with 'mirror symmetry' a la the 'walking ad' - for the attack on Manhattan 2001. Neither is it related to any sort of 8ell4 'octogon' as far as I am concerned. One notices the 'Ostway' of MLR April 1967 which even could have been originally about the way to the 'skrei' in the far north.

If agents are harassment-telephoning from near my home, it is not me but agents who call. I am not crazy and I do not do things which I don't know about - nor do I think it smart to knock down houses on Manhattan. I remember Ole Skau Jakobsen's stories in the mid seventies (could have been as early as 1973) about 'gobligobligob' ('Goebbels'?) and 'Austin Morris' and other things. Is there a 'sikasekk' here? 'Hooker-rumper ready at the mate of Clinton's hello by sikasekk' = 100.000 NOK? Cp. the two angelic beings behind the Christ of Tintoretto's last supper with the 'hooker-rumper' bottom. Clearly a knockdown of Manhattan must be considered a too mentally disturbed act to credited with political power.

Which means that if MLR April 1967 is about John's diaspora sister, and if the plan is to claim that my authorship really belongs to somebody else, there is no basis for putting me in a chemical bath or anything like that by recourse to the acquittal of Clinton in the impeachment process. One notices the fate of Ariel Sharon.

And with that fate of state chief Ariel Sharon, it looks as if Israel represents my interests indeed, and that should be enough to calm the nerves of the diaspora if they are worried about the role of Israel - if they are for or against them. But if so, then the question is precisely what is Israel's relations to me: If they indeed represent my interests while I am 'thrown out' (= Paelma ut), then it is only a matter of a hijacking of my interests and my person. That could be precisely the story of Gaza. It means that if my role is to represent the diaspora, the diaspora may be calmed by Israel behaving in my interests and take renewed confidence in Israel for such reasons, while the long-term effect of a rejection of me by Israel would be precisely the rejection of the diaspora - a rejection supported even by the diaspora themselves if they take confidence in Israel when they represent my interests. That is what this israeli embassy in 2004 was about. Which means that if Israel attacked Gaza on behalf of England, it would have been in extension of the interests of England since they started the project possibly as early as the beginning of the 18th century: Could be Alexander Pope (not to be confused with 'Halldor Laxness') and the rest of the scribleruses wrote some pages every morning and after some years there were a bunch of sagas about Skallagrimsson and Skaalaglams and all those grotesque-joke ancient heros and 'eddic' poetry (the word 'eddic' is norwegian for 'vinegar' - I suppose even the anglicans have the story of Jesus on the cross) - and the political effect of british rattling with this story for Iceland or even Norway could have about the effect of the jewish diaspora discovering that Moses perhaps never existed! And hence zionism at the end of the 19th century. And now England, after some 200 years of fraud, can see the beginning of the end of the diaspora?

The link between Aure-Osen and the Kennedy car accident at 'Chappaquiddick' is in the two letters which Nelly Sachs sent to Elisabeth Borchers (cp. 'bor der'). Soon after Sigtuna, she wrote on 14.9.64: "Bis zuletzt habe ich gedacht, Du kommst, aber es wurde nichts" which correlates with the end of each line in her poem "So steigt der Berg" - except for the two lines which end with 'ihr Land' and 'auswärts'. 'Nicht für die Sonne' = 'recht für die Sore' = 'eros' and hence Aure-Osen 1968 or 1969 when we drove into the dust road under the leafage canopy and Gröver/'Mengele' used the word 'kaudervelsk'. Backwards (by 'sore' = 'eros') this line produces various things about China and Chomsky etc, leaving the form 'chiezsib' which along with other cues ('ski paa taket' etc) seems to give 'Chappaquiddick' in the sense of me touching my genital region - and it looks as if that could have been a 'political' interpretetation - that Sachs met me in probably Molde and I touched my genital region somehow and that is why this element can be traced in these writings since it is taken to be her way of indexing the meeting in a way which only I can understand. (Gröver/'Mengele' later asked me what 'touch' means in orchestral jargon, and it may be that I looked out the window and that could be 'se-ut-vinduet' = 'Ötzi Wien-dove'). The other letter is the one of 31.5.63: "Schicke keine Bücher nur Erik ich muss ins Krankenhaus Wieder das Gleiche als Anlass. Post wird nachgeschickt". This nachschicken backwards is the reading of the other line backwards, and the word 'Krankenhaus' looks in her handwriting like 'kaudervelsk'. The first words look in handwriting in fact somewhat like 'Ulrike Mein-' and to this one could have added the 'Hof' of Bachmann. Hence 'Ulrike Meinhof' could in principle have been coordinated with Kennedy and Gröver/'Mengele'. If Ragnar Thoursie drove the car from Stockholm to Molde and back again, then he could have observed what Nelly Sachs observed of me. Cp. the wellknown photo of her I think from the late sixties with hand on her chest. The 'Chappaquiddick' could come from other similar readings of the 'kid-dick' in the situation which one has reconstructed in Molde when Sachs probably met me there - cp. 'ski paa taket' and 'Ragnar Tur-ski', 'bil-tur med ski paa taket'. Mary Jo Kopechne in the back seat of Kennedy's car at 'Chap-pa-quid-dick' would be about me in the back seat at Aure-Osen. The 'kaudervelsk' ('kau-derv-elsk') of Aure-Osen is Hitler's postcard, including basically the 'icelandic family sagas' of 'Horn, Britt, Buffals' = 'fridge of nonsense' etc. Hence the T-262 of de Gaulle's death date 562 weeks after the postcard was written - for making it look as if it was in the meeting between Sachs and me that that I suggested that we could attack the 'french president' - and that should have been the reason for his death on 7 November 1970. Then it looks as if this was appointed between Sachs and me after the 'Kennedy assassination' in 1963 - heralded well in advance in the undertext of MLR. That is why one can find some reason for calling the death of de Gaulle in 1970 for 'the Kennedy assassination', although the real quasi-reason could have been that Sachs had visited me in Molde.

I generally have problems with getting answers to my letters, but don't know the reason. I hope it is not about a 'coordinated' filter of post of 'Gori' = hebrew 'money' type on the background of 'Mary Jo Kopechne' in the sense of 'money tok paa pengene' = 'money touched the money', hence 'translator' = 'nuts lay Adam' or simply 'Quisling'. (I have not seen the film 'Lost in translation' but notice the mention of 'Gerhard Staufenbiel' in Sachs' letter to Ekelöf of 6.5.64). 'Man-y touched the money'. It was in 2002 that a 'Brunerie Maxime' (as was the name in the newspapers) shot after Chirac in Paris. He had a gun hidden in a guitar box.

All those things about Aure-Osen and Chappakiddick and things like that must be told explicitly so that people get a chance to understand what 'politics' is about.

The story of the foreskin from the time of the Kennedy assassination could have been about just that phenomenon - it would have been about her poem 'So steigt der Berg' (in the letter to Celan of 22.12.61 it is called 'Es steigt der Berg'): '...versetzt mein Herz in den Glanz deines Staubes'.

And then again the question is what this incursion into 'Lebanon' was in 1970 around the hour when Sachs died, some months before the death of de Gaulle: Was it Israel who 'touched the banana' and in that way 'protested' against the murder of her - and was that to represent my role or was it to hijack it? The military operation 'Cast lead' in 2008-2009 could be an indication of an interest in hijacking - in particular since this was shortly after my discovery in november 2008, and nazi politics tends to believe that some people write their authorships - adding chapter to chapter - with their penises (chap-pa-kid-dick). It was Mossad who was credited with the murder of Akhmed Bouchiki on Lillehammer. There was some January 2009 issue of MLR. (I was asked in December to read the 'contadini' four times a year, after I had asked for a fixed sum to pay four times a year while reading the 'contadini' once - the response resembled in this respect the one on my inquiry about foreign currency payment of pension).

If one reads out of the lines from Sachs around this time, one can reconstruct traces of an event with me leading my hand towards the genital region, as if that were the gesture I could recognize the meeting with. That could also be the background for a 'Kjönrök Fökjö' = 'rögtön jövök' intrigue. As if I were the monster who planned the murder of de Gaulle etc. ('Red cloth' as for bullfighting is 'röd klut' while 'rök lut' could be this 'rök' plus 'lut' = 'lye' - 'a bunch of lyes'?).

The discovery of a british authorship of the icelandic literature is potentially of extremely large value for finding a solution to the problem of nazism. One can guess that the Scriblerus Club wrote the old norse literature - including Jonathan Swift whose 'Gullivers Travels' then reads 'gul-liver-strap-els' = the 'Hepatitis-B' of the AIDSHIV test vaccine (MLR October 1978) and the 'straps' of the 'Serbs' down to Macedonia/Greece/Kosovo. The scribleruses met - with sanction from state leadership - regularly through many years and one can guess that they jointly chiselled out a golden-era scenario on Iceland and Norway with intrigues and stories of all kinds and then individually wrote various sagas and stories into this world of fiction planted into accepted history - for which reason a secret liaison between two persons of that saga world would leave different imprints on the various sagas but only the scribleruses and the state leadership they worked for would hold the real keys to the mystery. These notes from the meetings of the Scriblerus Club could therefore in theory be the well-hidden key to modern political power - it could be the secret which is held unconstitutionally by only a very small number of people, a small club of 'Bonnie-and-Clyde' world-coup format, and to rattle those keys is to rattle with holocaust. It could, to a jewish mind, mean that even the biblical existence of Moses could be doubted if such political intrigues be accepted as valid historic documents, and that could have been the reason for zionism. Certainly british intrigue could not have created Moses, but it could have created icelandic feelings.

Carbon-14 cannot solve the problem if the documents are written on old medieval parchment and paper from the royal archives of 18th century England. The first recognition of the value of the 13-14th century icelandic material seems to have been in England in the 17th century - but clearly the historic documentation of this recognition could have been produced later. Secret administrative services have been established around the world for producing reliable information for the government. Such intrigues on that secret level is a definite danger to the historic validity of the world. Who had access to the archives of the Vatican? The Scriblerus Club seems to have worked from 1713 to about 1740, and Alexander Pope is arguable somewhat similar to Hitler's propaganda minister (Paul) Joseph Goebbels - could be that is no coincidence. In fact the lefthand side of San Pantalon shows a figure who can represent both the 'doubles' of Goebbels' clubfoot and al-ex-ander P up. The righthand side shows a Run-at-hand Swift as the template of Hermann Göring. The front part shows a John Gay - including JFK and Hitler and Churchill - and the back part a 'John are butt not' = 'Heinrich Himmler'. But this painting in the ceiling was completed in 1704 and the Scriblerus Club was started in 1713. Which suggests that it is likely that the soffitto was completed first and then fictive british names were constructed to fit it - including Jonathan Swift and Alexander Pope, two of the great names of british literature - then conjecturally as a governmental project. It means that the biographies of Pope and Swift could have been artificial constructions - like the work they did. What a pitiful change of direction of british literature all this story could have been. And Gro Harlem Brundtland's global war in WHO against smoking ('Fumiani') would have collected much support because it seemed to take the evil - the Scriblerus Club - by the root while in actual fact the campaign probably only served to collect support for a global campaign against me = the jewish-genetic diaspora. In particular the jewish-genetic diaspora could have been happy about this. The 'Clinton phenomenon' could be about the same.

One of the three doctors in the psychiatric hospital where I was held over the millenium shift was called 'Liv Sagatun', something which even could have found an interpretation in the scope of the Ehamgasse camera. (The story has been told me by HE that I think 'Njaals Saga' - a story of some 400 pages - contains only one adjective - in the expression 'fager er lia' - I have read the saga but cannot remember the line - and I notice the name-relation of 'Vilhelm Evang' with 'Elias Mevang'). When Celan let himself be convinced of the need for psychiatric treatment in early May 1965, he left an envelope for his wife with a letter and the poem 'Ein Dröhnen', which was the name of the second doctor, the chief doctor called 'Tore Drönen'. The third had a name meaning 'eye'. Could be the names were telling somehow of the background of my stay there. In any case the three names can be seen to have some representation in the short poem 'Ein Dröhnen' in Celan's 'Atemwende'.

Is it considered political madness to touch the validity of the sagas? Or is it considered political madness to suggest that a certain percentage of newborn children are mutilated with 'third eye' laser beam in the hospitals - for relegation to a new political proletariat subjected to enhanced computerized political control via administrative logic in later life? My novel 'The Dreamer' (not 'Ein Dröhnen'!) is certainly written by me - it was left behind on my computer when I was driven to the hospital in 1999 - and although there are reasons to believe that it could have been stolen in that afternoon of 22/11-99, it could of course have been stolen much earlier and the theft of 1999 could even have served to index this poem of Celan. The poem indexes the three doctor names rather precisely: "Ein Dröhnen: es ist / die Wahrheit selbst [= Tore Drönen] / untern den Menschen / getreten, [= Liv Sagatun] / mitten ins Metapherngestöber. [= Heidi Öyen Larsen]". (The next poem starts "Irrennäpfe, vergammelte / Tiefen" - as if the school dentist mutilation now is too long ago. Cp. also the 'kneecaps' of MLR April 1970).

It could be of urgent importance to lend public attention to all these intrigues for preventing a world coup of the power which entails a blunt negation of the value of cultural and spiritual life. While the communist utopia suggests a unilaterality of goodness-orientation from the subject to the community in a goodness-driven economy, the hijacking of the russian revolution entails a corresponding unilaterality but the other way round - for the concept of monarchic power. It is only outspokenness which can rescue the world - not action. One cannot wait so long with publishing the facts of history that the intrigue has arrived at the point of a total doubt in people's confidence in facts: If, after some 100-200 years of 'politeness' towards the british 'bella figura', it finally is pronounced that Hitler was an agent for England and hence it was England who organized the holocaust, it may be too late since people have lost the faith in historic documentation. And then it may be too late to claim that a new upper class mutilates the newborn lower class simply because the truth doesn't count any longer. I saw an ad for SPÖ in Vienna with a photo of a 'happy' person - could be she was a candidate for inheriting the earth.

Could be the 'Scribleruses' nearly destroyed the culture of the whole world. If the story of the modern world is 300 years of british fraud and terror, it is not likely that the britons can turn around in a few years. 'Handle with care' could mean 'rotten eggs' but then the roles could also be turned around if british power be allowed to continue in the same way. I was 'handled with care' in 1999-2000. Outspokenness means that one must not talk of 'written bogs' if the point is that britons must be handled like rotten eggs. But then one must explain why 'rotten eggs' could be a suitable term - and then the discussion must be neutral and without contempt and for the sake of understanding the history - otherwise it could be to go in a british trap. They could well have made the concept themselves - for turning the roles and for claiming that the bad smell is not from a 'fart' of John Bjarne Grover but on the contrary it comes from rotten british eggs! - just like foot-and-mouth in 2001 was a massive british 'culling' - the word 'k[j]öling' is danish-norwegian for 'cooling', as for 'fridge of nonsense' in the sense of icelandic sagas. And if the royal massacre in Nepal was arranged by England, it was a british royal massacre. This seems to be the style - and then only explicit outspokenness can do.

John Arbuthnot was one of the founders of the 'Scriblerus Club'. 'John arvet not' = 'John inherited not' = 'skjenkens ærv' (for 'enkens skjerv') = the Schengen agreement which allows for extensive surveillance of privacy. If the index on my person at the turn of the millenium 1999-2000 was this poem 'Ein Dröhnen' by Celan, the idea with the Schengen agreement could have been this 'John arvet not' in the sense of not having inherited Celan's poetic talent - except perhaps his ability to drink alcohol = 'skjenken', if Celan did any of that (a little perhaps, now and then) - for which reason the intrigue could have been that I had not written the novel or other stuff left behind on the computer when I was taken away in the police car on 22/11-99. The doctor in the reception told me that I had been a bright pupil in school but my performance had deteriorated dramatically in the years since I dropped out of high school (as if I had spent the years with drinking alcohol - cp. 'vild-anden'/'ild-vanden' and Fielding's listings). Also, to inherit a sideboard is not to inherit nothing, although it is perhaps not so much, for which reason a 'arvet not' could mean not the material things but rather the poetic talent (unless a 'knot' could be considered a sort of 'sideboard' - and there is the expression 'en poet uten sidestykke'). It is also a fact that I did not inherit material values from neither Celan not Sachs - and that could mean that 'John arvet [k]not' entails a priority to the conventional and not the genetic parenthood. Celan's will certainly must have been authentic and within the knowledge of his wife, but Sachs' could perhaps in theory have been edited after her death - as seems to have been the theme of Bengt Holmqvist's communication to Celan about 'postkakanisch Vidimierung' mentioned in Celan's letter of 13 January 1967 - there is even the use of the word 'abschweifend' which could be lifted into the environments of 'John at hand swift'. But then the real interest behind this would be the political power potential in the intrigues from the Scriblerus Club. Vibeke Gröver worked for a year at the Rudolf Steiner institution called 'Camphill' at Aberdeen in the mid 70's - it seems to be less than 30 kilometres from Arbuthnott in Scotland. I got a bottle of 'Glenfiddich' whisky from her when she returned (could of course have been what the boat could offer in the tax-free shop). She later married 'Knut Aukrust' - the name could even be taken to resemble a rewrite of 'John Arbuthnott'. This story means that the detention of me in the hospital ('Sandviken Psykiatriske Sykehus' - cp. 'Aung San Suu Kyi') in Bergen in 1999-2000 lends to the Schengen agreement the value of a propaganda service for the power of the 'Scriblerus Club' from the early 18th century. The club was only semi-official - it had its meetings in the home of one of them and although Arbuthnot was the doctor of the queen and the government seemed to endorse their activities, it is likely that the official government would pretend to be ignorant about what the club was doing in their meetings. For which reason it may be that they still will pretend that they know nothing about this unconstitutional intrigue which by now could be at the point of a complete power take-over, including the mutilation of Manhattan in 2001 which seems to have been left in a semi-accepted form so far. The republicans did not publish the theory of a democrat attack on USA - they used the intermediate time to take the puppet regimes of Afghanistan and Iraq before they could return to a closer study of the history of 2001 - if that is the true version of the history. If one concludes that it is not the true version, then history may feel more inclined to believe that it was an unfair attack on the two countries with Manhattan as 'pretext'. It is well possible that the theory of the US democrat attack on the US constitutional system would not have been taken seriously if they had not first taken down the political effects of the 'puppet regimes' in these two countries (I don't know if they were puppet regimes for the democrats and britons - could be they were). A hypothetical continuation or variant of the 'Klipra connection' could be based on that story of the Scribleruses and the governments could pretend that they understand nothing of this story.

I think the Dead Sea Scrolls found in February 1947 but announced in undertext style in the british periodical MLR January 1947 is proof enough that one has to allow for extensive speculations on a british origin of the icelandic and old norse literature. And that could be the very essential story behind nazism. I think the announcement in the british periodcal of this finding in advance of the Dead Sea finding should be enough reason to start assessing the hypothesis seriously that britons wrote the old norse literary material. And one should add the Beowulf epic - which could serve as a responsibility claim on just the icelandic material. It would be a massive relief for norwegian and icelandic culture if it is shown that their glorious past of those daring explorers were a bad joke from England - a joke so bad that it even can make the culture hop like a jumping jack with only a slight pulling of the historic strings - and indeed it could be that the whole 1-2-3 ladder would collapse if that evil be taken at the root. There have been enormous investments into philological studies in old norse, anglo-saxon poetry, cuneiform and similar fields of study. The barbarisms of scriblerus-'kitchener' exploration into the 'terra inkognita' - the first history -writing of home-made old norse could have been easy matter and made immeasurable damage. Certainly to find that much of this saga stuff turns out to be fraud could be an enormous relief for not only norwegian and icelandic culture - but most importantly also for british culture. People cannot take themselves seriously under such conditions and they are easy prey for agents. Was even Asbjörnsen and Moe a couple of british writers who collected fairy tales in their home office and wrote them out for print? They 'travelled around' = 'ronk röver'? Could be one day it will be possible to start talking outright truth even in England - and writing outright poetry without a tacit sanction from an inherent propaganda function. British poets should have been furious about a british old norse fraud of the 'eddic poetry' if that is the story. For the time being, a revolution in England is probably a hilarious idea - there is hardly square metre of the country which is not surveyed by a centrally connected camera.

J.R.R.Tolkien was professor of icelandic, gothic and old english languages and wrote the 'Hobbit' and 'The lord of the rings'. Is this really, as claims Microsoft Encarta, the world's most read book after the Bible? Or is that only a way of saying that Tolkien incorporates the story of the old norse literature for a general tacit accept of the project? I am very certain that one cannot take the sales numbers of Tolkien as a tacit accept of a scriblerus fraud of old norse literature.

As far as Israel and my role as zwischenpapier is concerned, it must be noted that the attacks on Lebanon and Gaza could have served just the political purposes of a 'Schengen agreement' in the sense of 'John arvet not' - they support the artwork and the ideas therein - including the support for the interests of the jewish-genetic diaspora - but could be they would doubt my authorship to the novel. That is why the israeli embassy in Berlin could have sent me a friendly letter of thanks.

If 'Alexander P-ope' and 'Run-at-hand Swift' are Goebbels and Göring, and if this 'papal bullet-in' (in the left-right dimension of the church, in parallel with the IBAN-and-BIC AFFE) was the background for the attempt on the pope in 1981, one can draw the conclusion that the whole story is about the anglican church - including perhaps the Oxford movement and strange ideas about what is consumed during the holy communion in church. If the anglicans do not accept the historic revelation of the church, could be they do not trust the transsubstantian of the host during communion enough to believe that the institutionalized biscuit is real flesh, and therefore they nourish other ideas about the status of 'cannibalism' as an interpretation of the last supper. The use of IBAN and BIC AFFE in international bank transactions (and in the names of the chiefs of UN since the fifties!) tells of progress for the interests behind the 1981 attempt on the pope.

If so, and if the anglican church is the real background for nazism and the holocaust, one will probably have to conclude that the national anglican state church must be considered a dangerous sect which mixes earthen and heavenly interests and sees the jewish origin of the old testament a threat to their world view. The character of state church leads to a mixture of the interests of the state and the church and the holocaust would thereby have been a result of this mixture of interests of the state of England.

The international community could perhaps to a considerable extent come to grips with the problem of nazism by 1) dismantling as much as possible of british fraud, and 2) request a detachment of state and church in England. The question from a scholarly viewpoint must then not be 'are there any reasons to believe that this icelandic saga is fraud?' but rather 'can one prove conclusively that this icelandic saga cannot be british fraud?' The threshold between these two questions is long-since overstepped and one can take MLR January 1947 as enough proof for the relevance of the second and not the first question. Thirdly, if the purpose with Modern Language Review is to reach a level where one simply writes in a publication in advance the name of the person to be picked out for verboten mistreatment, then one should except a massive international pressure on England for having the publication closed down. Not Rover but MLR. The aim of the british program is likely to be to turn all literary, artistic, scholarly expressions onto a format a la Modern Language Review - heralding terror and fraud and administrative plans in advance, for a naivissimo idea of 'turning time around' for breaking through the informational barrier of the speed of light.

The first issue of the periodical, October 1905, seems to be about the finding of the 'hittite' tablets in Boghazköy:

1. Some notes on the comparative study of literature. By G.Gregory Smith
2. English translations of Dante in the eighteenth century. By Paget Toynbee
3. Notes on passages in Shelley. By A.C.Bradley
4. The authorship of the songs in Lyly's plays. By W.W.Greg
5. A german version of the thief-legend. By Jessie Crosland

It is likely that these five articles encode the mystery of the hittite language that was dug up in Boghazköy around these times - notably by professor Winckler in 1906. For example, one guesses that 1 = the Greg-extended = the horizontal wedge, that article 2 tells of a permutation algorithm on terza rima form and hence either slash or vertical. There is a GAS-PAS-GAS in article 3, could be as a principle of mirror symmetry in cuneiform transposed onto the hittite material, and if it is a broadly C then it is likely to be the big 'crescent' wedge. 4 = Greg is not as long as in 1, could be a slash. 5 = ronk röver, could be the remaining of the standard 5 graphemes. The articles could tell of the 'semantics' to the decipherment which was made in 1915 - a 'hitlerite' language spoken by the people who lived in Palestine BEFORE the israelites came there. Which means that Hitler could have believed that he was the one who had the legitimate right to be there - and the Jews had not. A land of milk and honey - cp. the 'Ø-streicher' phenomenon when the 'milk-and-honey' is 'landed' on the belly - and Alexander Graham Bell etc. Elisha 'Greg' Gray, Graham 'Gregory' Bell. One can guess that the tablets had been made in England and dug down in Turkey around 1850 or a little later, and then the sensational finding was made in 1906 when the periodical started. If the story is really bad, then one could postulate that the evidence in the tablets for Saussure's laryngeal theory was made even before his proto-indo-european theory of about 1870 - which could mean that Saussure in theory could have made his theory in accordance with the tablets. But it need not be that bad - the ancient tablets could of course have been younger than his theory. Why should Saussure have been swiss if he worked for England? That could have had to be for the idea of 'time backwards' in the naive british chess-board-style conceptualization.

Article 1 starts - the first line in the history of the periodical - as follows: "The late M.Gaston Paris..." - which suppresses a 'm-ONSIEUR' - and one can guess that this is the oyster farm of Bjarne Eidsvig. "In Shelley" in the mid #3. The oyster is moister. Austria is Maustria. Onsöy is the district, including Gressvik, on the other side of the Seut bridge some hundred metres down from Labråten 58. This could mean that some heavyweight importance could have been assigned to the 'Ötzi' character. (In Scriblerus-member Thomas Parnell's "Homer's 'Battle of the frogs and mice'" from 1717 there is a frog named 'Seutlæus', and there is a short way from 'Parnell' - or even 'Pernille' - to the piliplu/prikopil 'panier' of Dickens' olive twig - see below - as if the 'panier' should have contained frogs and mice which had to be 'battled' down - Gröver/'Mengele' often served 'paniert' fish fingers). I think Gröver/'Mengele' had a colleague called 'Söyland' - a name which also associates with 'the columns'. 'Söyler' = 'columns' is turkish for 'words', such as Hamlet is reading.

If Chomsky/me and the hittite tablets are the beginning of MLR and the holocaust 1933-45, the role of Sisson tells of a possible extension of the same principles in terms of the Dead Sea Scrolls. One adds to this the Rosetta stone, the Behistun wall, Beowulf and the icelandic sagas and much else which could have been produced for cheating people in their foundations of the necessary human faith in the honesty of their fellow beings for the development of common knowledge. Hittite tablets tell of king Suppiluliuma and Hattusili II and Muwattalli and other interesting things - although these are mentioned already in Encyclopedia Britannica for 1910 - well before the tablets were 'deciphered' in 1915. There is a certain ring of 'Manhattan' in this complex of names.

John G.Robertson was editor of the first issue. 'John Crappertson' could be the son of John Gröver - hence me. He was later accompanied by G.C.Moore Smith and Edmund G.Gardner, who edited the periodical untill the end of 1927 when Smith was replaced with Charles Jasper Sisson in January 1928 - when the first issue had only two articles: 1) The revisions of 'Piers Plowman', by Mabel Day, and 2) 'Johann Elias Schlegel in Denmark', by J.W.Eaton. This 1928 was the year when Chomsky was launched at the time of his birth in December - with the articles in October 1928:

1. More's history of Richard III. By R.W.Chambers
2. Giacopo Castelvetro. By Sheila E.Dimsey
3. The 'Cantar de Gesta' of Bernardo del Carpio, III, IV. By William J.Entwistle
4. Notes on a middle high german 'Marien Himmelfahrt'. By F.Norman

More's sister if her itch earthry? This is likely to be the More Smith who was replaced with Sisson. Are you Chambers? No I'm Dimsey. (Disney?) This is the variant of 'Are you Chimsky?' 'No, I'm Chomsky'. It is the copy of the castle of glass in the high air ('a sort of 'blankenborg'?) in 2 which is the dream of british hijacking of culture and ideas. William Entwistle also figured in MLR 1923 for Erich Ludendorff. Could that 'public convenience' - or rather its NEG = 'er ich' = 'is not' - be a sort of 'chomsky'? I suppose it is more about the opposite - a 'John Gröver' - a norman. 'Cantar de Gesta' = 'Song de Gesta' = 'John of the sister' Bjarne del Gröver. This means the whole scenario with Chomsky and me and the holocaust - which consequently was a british program, as proves this periodical. Chomsky published his first book launching the concept of 'phrase structure grammar' at the time of my birth and it may be that a part of the political interests in his success can be found in a Mengele-'pumping' mechanism from my early childhood as a source of progress for a construction over the nazi death camps. At least MLR Oct 1928 seems to suggest that this could have been the plan - in which case it could have been about creating a big propaganda mill for the concept of the Black Sea Loop. The copy of the castle of glass is probably thereby supposed to be what is lifted from the eastern hemisphere of e.g. Lenin's revolution representing Leonie Sachs towards the western world with Chomsky. The 'fart' of my role is in 'Marien Himmelfahrt' - a probably Mengele-chemical 'fart' in the high air transmitted via the genetic space (and modelled in the Challenger space shuttle disaster). This is a typical and british misunderstanding of what the 'Fahrt ins Staublose' means - it is what poetry is about and that is not british farts. The scheme in MLR seems to be Mengele's 'fart' on my childhood body. Is cannibalism another theme?

Noam Avram Chomsky - with 'Avram' for 'Bjarne': That could be the Abr-Eham monster which hence means MLR. Since Chomsky is indexed before his birth, it is not necessarily the case that he has been an agent.

This scheme is represented by the change of editor in January 1928: From Smith to Sisson. But that means that the change of british labour party chief in 1997 from Smith to Blair is likely to have been about the same.

One understands why the periodical is called 'modern language review'.

Rotten eggs, cannibals, swindlers, murderers, terrorists: Will the britons succeed in turning the roles around? I think Lenin should have told whatever he knew about these plans instead of respecting other people's 'political' programs when they are of that type - then perhaps his own revolution would not have been hijacked by the 'role-turners'. But these plans were made in England some 2-300 years ago and they are still not told to the public. That is why there is such a terrible crisis in culture and science and arts. What are the britons thinking of today? New methods for turning 'farting cannibals' around - or have they started more advanced thinking on the island? Chemicals and gases for turning people's thoughts around to their opposite? I think those administrations who know what is circulating in british minds nowadays should tell it to the public so that we don't have to face the failure of the poetic revolution once again.

Comment on the attempt on the pope 1981

The following background is theoretically possible: Nelly Sachs is my genetic mother and I was in school or kindergarden in Volda or probably Molde some time around 1965. Ragnar Thoursie - as goes the hypothesis here - offered Nelly Sachs a ride with his car from Stockholm to where I lived, for giving her a chance to meet me, and back again. This could have been the reason for the meeting of Gruppe 47 in Sigtuna in September 1964. On the way back, perhaps before Oslo, there could have been a 'genetic' event with Thoursie. It is 'documented' in Modern Language Review April 1967 and in the car accident at Chappaquiddick with Ted Kennedy 1969 - and the newspiece, as a basis for e.g. this Chappaquiddick, could have been in the 'Hilton smell' of the passport controller at the border of Kongsvinger. There had to be reasons for it, and so forth. However, it need not have been an event of practical reality - it could be that this idea is only a way of conceptualizing the ride with his car and the meeting with her own genetics and back again. Which could mean that the meeting with 'her own genetics' would have been a meeting with Thoursie's genetics - and hence he would have 'taken her place'. Hence 'Varför samordnad' etc. MLR April 1967 has a title about an 'Ahnfrau'.

Aud Blankenborg was the union leader of the norwegian nurses for some years (seventies or eighties) - cp. 'norge skitur'. Friedrich von Blanckenburg is an early theorist of the novel with his 'Versuch über den Roman' from 1774. On p.18 there is the line: "Wie könnte der Muselmann sich bey der christlichen Epopee gefallen?" (I stopped by this line due to a comment from a person in 2002). If one inserts a 'K' in the 'Mus-K-elmann', one could think of the hypothesized event in Norway as being about an indication that Thoursie was a 'musclemann' who perhaps even could have taken somebody else's place - Nelly Sachs' place that would mean, or even that he were a double: If there have been rumours about Sachs being replaced with a copy in the late sixties, it could have had its origin in such an idea. The line would give a reason for the event: If Thoursie was a 'copy', that could have been the reason since, by nazi logic, it would have given Sachs the choice beween 'Mus-ell-Man' ('mouse or man') = '8ell4', the signature of Hitler which looks like 'Nelly X'. 'Mus-kell-mann' would mean that the man was in a rathole in the basement. The attempt on the pope was by a turkish person - hence conjecturally a Muselmann - and when his name was 'Ali Acqa' suggesting 'he has it in the jacket', there is the explanation why the 'K' is missing from the word: He has it in his jacket. Biceps, bis-kops, biscuits etc.

The effect of this would have been that it addressed the crossover dimension in the ceiling of San Pantalon - from Pope/Goebbels to Swift/Goering - for the 'papal bullet-in' in the combination of Alexander Pope and 'Run-at-hand Swift'. That is the Scriblerus Club which seems to be the historic origin in some way or other of nearly all political evil in the last 300 years. Since these two famous author names are correlated with the painting of Fumiani in the ceiling of San Pantalon, completed before the club was started, it could suggest that even these two authors were 'copies' of other people - and that Pope and Swift were fictive identities created by the government and the project for gigantic fraud on icelandic sagas were carried out in a private club without the government's knowledge. One can see this as the background of pope John Paul I-II.

The attempt on the pope in 1981 could have been an attempt to turn the roles around by way of this line from Blanckenburg 1774 when applied to Sachs and Thoursie and the 'bullet-in' which came from the K in the jacket. It could likely have been a british 'anglican' project - for the Black Sea Loop over Vienna. Loristrasse is the parallel street to Ehamgasse in Vienna - and there is the mention on Blanckenburg p.5 of 'Roman de la Rose' which was begun by 'Guillaume de Lorris' and completed by 'Jean de Meun' = 'Möens gen' = 'Möens Klint' = 'Clinton's Mö' = 'Clinton's wife/girl'. A MÖ is really a cow or simply a KU: Hence Clinton's KU. By the take-over of the author role. (I was also asked in Vienna if I had seen a missing key). 'Gå, mann! Det øla kosen', which means Bergen dialect (and norses really should sink in the earth by such semantics in 'international politics' - it tells of an alarming gap between historic fiction and historic reality in the norwegian world - and it really is time to understand that this alarming gap is likely to be a british anglican invention: Haha, the battle of Stiklestad and Magnus Lagaböter is only for making the world take faith in Hitler hopping in his gym room!). Cp. also the vague similarity of 'Guillaume de Lorris' with 'Ragnar Thoursie' and 'Jean de Meun' with 'Jean Bollack' ('bowl-like').

One notices Thursday-Birthday, Torah Borah, Thoursie-Bushy. TB day in WHO. 11 September 2001 could have been a way of dumping the blame on Bush. Tolkien-BALCANy of the Rwanda genocide could have been a part of the story - and that is when one spots the 'MDLVI' on the pillar to the little 1556 chapel in San Trovaso, next to the 1444 Giambono - with the 'papal bulletin' on Tordesillas 1500 in the mid point.

As far as the 'Roman de la Rose' is concerned, I notice the following: There are 12 years from the death of pope Pius XII in 1958 to an afternoon walk with Gröver/'Mengele' in 1970, not long after we had moved to Fredrikstad and the dentist had probably already started the drilling (cp. the caves of Tora Bora etc). It was in October 1980, and I take the liberty to conjecture that it was on 9 October 1970. We went from the house in Kongensgate 8 ('Kings Street 8', an old white wooden house later demolished) where we had moved in a few months earlier, down Colbjørnsensgate to the intersection to Nygata where there was a 'traffic island' with yellow roses. As we walked past the roses, Gröver/'Mengele' said: "Hm, yellow roses in October...", in Norwegian "gule roser i Oktober", and he added that it sounds like the title of a detective story book (an article in a bookshop, that could be, or even a kiosk). I have later understood that these roses could have been prearranged, could be even planted out for the particular occasion, and that is why he took me for that walk. The incident got a comment years later with the Medjugorje apparitions of Madonna in 'Bosnia Herzegovina' cp. 'Gosnia Herzebovina' as for 'Rule Goser' - starting shortly after the attempt on the pope in Rome - the 'Versuch über den Roman' - on St.Peter's Square in 1981, the place most similar to the tragic 'Rampe' where Mengele stood - St.Peter style - every day and sorted the arrivers to Auschwitz to life or to death. After I had lived in Vienna a couple of years, in the parallel street to Loristrasse, 'Gusenbauer' was elected prime minister, and when I moved away from Austria, he slipped out of politics, or at least out of the leadership. Clearly if the Rosenroman is the key to the whole story, the real interest could be in the Rosetta-stone which probably is a piece of british swindle. It was found 100 year almost on the day before the birth of Bjarne Eidsvig,the brother of Aron Eidsvig. Egyptian hieroglyphs are probably not deciphered at all, is my guess. I have so far, by 12 March 2009, not yet received the Finanzierungsbeitrag which I paid to ÖVW in late 2004.

This means that if Blanckenburg's 'Versuch über den Roman' has been the framework of political propaganda based on the attempt on the pope and Rwanda and much else, it could have done a lot of damage also to the genre of the novel at least in the interpretation which I have given it.

One finds Blanckenburg's book from 1774 for reading some original and authentic theories of the novel but hasn't read many pages before one runs into an intrigue from the nazis. Already in the preface p.V there is a 'Ziegler' quoted. They seem to have peed on nearly every interesting cultural lamppost there is in the history of the western world. There is a lot of work to be done with cleaning the areas before one can continue.

The solution to all this is of course for the rest of the world to request a full account of all secret agencies run by primarily England and secondarily affiliates in USA: A publishable catalogue of all agents and their tasks and what they have done and an end to all these intrigues. That could be the theme of a continued 'Nürnberg' trial. One guesses that England and affiliates could have used terror in e.g. Germany and Italy for spreading fear on certain indexed points of the administration where they have tried to get their agents in. It is a dangerous and fanatic sect which works in that manner.

The Lockerbie bombing

An example of more advanced 'responsibility claim' can be found in the issue of MLR right before the Lockerbie bombing on 21 December 1988. A closer study of the details in the preparations to this bombing and the process against the bombers shows that it served to represent the walk up the stairs in Labråten 58 - the referential locus of a majority of the death camps in the holocaust - and the pullup of the keys next to the broom and the opening of the door - which thereby comes to represent 'Visthouse' by Freemantle and Lawson. It was a PAN AM 103A which was bombed - and I have earlier launched the hypothesis that the original background for the bombing was the situation in front of the garage when a beagle called 'Pan' attempted sexual intercourse with one of my legs. It is this scheme which is represented in MLR Oct 1988 - and that means that the average reader has not the slightest chance to recognize what this periodical is if this is the explanation. Here are the titles to October 1988:

1. Robert Harley to Daniel Defoe: A new letter. By Paula R.Backschneider
2. The lover-poet and love as the most pleasing 'matere' in medieval french love poetry. By Nicolette Zeeman
3. Time and instability in Nerval's Sylvie. By A.W.Raitt
4. Apollinarie's 'Le Livre' and the visual imperative. By Willard Bohn
5. The contribution of Badiot Dolomitic to european literature. By D.B.Gregor
6. 'Invitación al aire': The imagery of ascent in Alberti's Sobre los ángeles. By Derek Gagen
7. 'Neglecting the weight of the elephant...': German prose fiction and european realism. By Martin Swales
8. Green thoughts of the dialectician: Bertolt Brecht's poem 'Das Gewächshaus'. By G.L.Jones
9. Leskov's Soboryane: A tale of good and evil in the russian provinces. By Faith Wigzell
10. Muslim oral epic and medieval epic. By John S.Miletich

I delimit the discussion to the titles which seem to have an interpretation with some degree of certainty. The simplest one is of course #6, which seems to tell of the way up from the garage through the garden ('hagen') to the stairs which lead up to the door.

#9 is also easy and a good proof of the validity of the analysis: Leskov's Soboryane: A tale of good and evil in the russian provinces. By Faith Wigzell - could be about the beagle dog (russian 'sobaka') called PAN who attempted intercourse with one of my legs, wagging its tail, in front of the garage: Maybe he had a 'garage' on me. (Gröver/'Mengele' allegedly died from 'pancreas cancer' in 1990). The faith is about the god backwards: 'Leskov' backwards is 'Wigzell', hence not a 'god' but a 'dog'. Abdel Basset Ali Megrahi was one of the two accused of the bombing. Charles Darwin travelled with the ship Beagle to Galapagos. Pan Am 103A went from Frankfurt to New York over London.

There seems to be a 'fi-los-o-fi' = 'fi-lock-and-fi' in the structure. That means 'Lock-er-bie'. It was in probably 1987 or 1988 that Ole-Johan Dahl in his office told me the 'if' of lefthand parenthesis with the 'fi' of righthand parenthesis in programming language. There is also the concept of the 'aunt' (Tantolunden etc) = 'parent-sister' = 'parenthesis'. Chomskyan grammar is based on the concept of infinite nesting loops which means that one first prints out all the infinite number of lefthand parentheses (contexts) before one starts printing out the righthand ones - which then must have been stored in 'memory' somewhere. But this memory must be in eternity if the printout is infinite. Hence title #7. 'Neglecting the weight of the elephant...' - ignoring the massive pileup due to the incredible memory (not only weight) of the elephant. The interesting aspect of this title is that it seems to tell the date 21 December 1988 of the Lockerbie bombing, which was 9 months minus 1 day after the (official) death of Gudmund Harlem on 22 March 1988: 'German prose fiction' = 'Gudmund Harlem pregnancy' while 'european realism' can be seen to mean 'minus 1 day'. By Martin Swales = by my art in the whales = the program of 'whaling' terrorism on Gandhi, Kennedy etc. Harlem achieved his doctorate degree in the 1976 when I started studying after high school and he got a professorship in Trondheim in the spring 1977 after I had jumped off even the studies at the university. Chomsky is a professor of not only linguistics but even philosophy. For 'aunt' = 'parent-sister' = 'parenthesis', Celan's aunt was called Bertha Antschel. Bertrand Badiou is an editor-scholar of Celan's poetry at Suhrkamp - and it seems that Suhrkamp acquired Jüdischer Verlag around the time of the Lockerbie bombing. I don't know when Badiou started his work with the source material after Celan. 'D.B.Gregor' resembles 'J.B.Grover'. Articles #1 and 2 could perhaps relate to the concept of 'lokkerdue' (including a new letter 'd' for 'b') = 'decoy' (cp. 'BIC o IBAN' and the beagle PAN) for a 'lover-poet' (#2) story from the early eighties possibly with decoy involved for 'going in the trap', in which case 'Nicolette Zeeman' perhaps could be about 'nicotin Celan'. Was there somebody with a cigar - installed by a 'Backschneider'? Lamen Khalifa Fhima was the other person accused of the bombing. If 'Che Guevara' = 'cigar-Eva' had been the neighbour in Labråten, the name of his wife 'Aleida' would have expanded by 'K' into 'Al Qaida'. I suppose the neighbour was an ordinary person - the name was 'Blom', cp. the 'broom' between the staircase in Labråten 58 and the window in the neighbour house, and title #8 could also be telling of the book by Robert Havemann called 'Dialectics without dogmas' which I got for I think my 16th birthday, 8 days before the death of Max Horkheimer. One notices that the flight was called 103A which suggests 1234 - if there is a 'Schneider' on the 'O'. The bombing was at 19:02:50. Celan was born 23/11-1920.

'To go in the trap' = 'to go in the staircase': I had once (early eighties, probably, or late seventies) asked Gröver/'Mengele' if he had considered another name than Gröver when he changed from Jensen in 1946 and he said, while putting the righthand foot on the first step up to the floor above, that he had considered 'Erving' but given it up and chose 'Gröver' instead. This was the inside staircase in the house while 'Lockerbie' seems to have been about the outside staircase. (There is a window between these two staircases, just like there is in the neighbouring house on the other side of the broom). 'Time and instability' could perhaps tell of the the name-change from Jensen to Gröver and the moment when he put his righthand foot 'in step-ility' of the staircase: This would, though, mean that it is about the NAME, and that brings another interpretation to the form "in Nerval's Sylvie" which can take on the form 'i knörva kebir' = 'i birke-beiner' = 'in Ragnar Thoursie', according to the above analysis. (I remember one evening in Bregneveien in Oslo when the doorbell rang and a sunnmörian told that he came with 'fiskebilen fra Möre' - if I wanted to buy a cod?) Would that suggest that Thoursie had 'cigar' when he and Sachs drove to Molde and back again? If so, that could explain the story if there were a story on that way: One cigar and an Eve-cigar. "How come a mus-K-ulman could feel at home in the christian 'Epopee'?", asks Blanckenburg. That is the theme of article #10 and then it could be about 'John's smiletouch' or 'John's Biltur'. John's neighbour on the other side of the street was called Ingvoldstad - one notices the story with Paris mayor Bertrand Delanoe and 'Assedine Berkane' who during a Paris salon night 'innvoll-stakk' him - vs. 'Ingvol[d]sta[d]' with mute d's - I did receive some unemployment support in Paris and certainly that was a great help. (The case could have resembled the one of Anna Lindh 2003). But of course the pope had no cigar - but Gröver/'Mengele' could have had one. Celan's comment in his 'Der Meridian' about the 'Literarhistorisch' Gravis accent could be an allusion to the phenomenon. If John Paul II had had a cigar in his colon, they would of course have found it in 1981. Thoursie was 'byrå-chief' in the swedish administration, while Gröver/'Mengele' was a representative in the municipal council = 'byrå-det'. While the instep was in the lower part of the stairs, he asked me on top of the stairs, at the kitchen table, what orchestral 'touch' means.

Abdel Basset Ali Megrahi and Lamen Khalifa Fhima were accused of the bombing. That seems to be the names behind title #4: 'Apoll inaries' = 'Abdul Basset' in particular when the basset really is a beagle, while 'Leli Vreand' = 'Ali Megrahi' and 'the visual imperative' = 'Lamen Khalifa Fhima'. But why then by 'Willard Bohn' = 'Bond-devil'? That could have been about the role of the 'JBG' = '7136' of my name as the possible origin of the character 'James Bond'. I notice that Jostein Simble of 'NMI of the state' had a new heart valve = 'klaff' (cp. 'flap' of venetian dialect) installed in the early eighties, but he said it was put in wrong way - one heard the unpleasant sound - and it had to be done over again.

In short, there is no doubt that Modern Language Review October 1988 indexes in advance the bombing of Pan Am 103A over Lockerbie. That is called terrorism. It seems that one can come to the conclusion that the investigation can be considered ended and the thesis proven that the MLR indexes terror in advance and it must be considered british state terrorism. One does not have to waste time on testing the hypothesis that the state of England quite simply were not aware of this phenomenon: A thunderbolt from the blue sky it cannot be, after 100 years with Chomsky and Hitler and everything. And the periodical is still up and running - then it means british state terrorism.

If you get a letter from me, don't answer with public arrangements or exposure of something related in the media. Answer my letter first and then you can do what you want in the public media thereafter (but then maybe it is not so interesting any longer?). Anything else is british nazi propaganda. If you have been in contact with me in any way, there may pop up an idea in your mind that you are not safe any longer. That is because the name of the british game is that nobody could guess that the britons are like this and they prefer to murder those people who would never ever have thought like that about the britons. Typically, an intellectual who reads british newspapers and periodicals and watch BBC. The safest thing to do if you feel uncomfortable about some contact with me is therefore to throw some dirt on the britons - they are still running this MLR, for example: Find some dirt in the story and throw it back on them. That is where it belongs and one must stop taking any dangerous confidence in their 'face value'. Then there is nothing to gain for the britons in doing you any harm. They are waiting for somebody to stop them - like the Jews wait for Messiah and the Catholics for Christ. A 'Christ-mobber' called 'Competition'? (I recall Ribu had a record with a 'constipation blues'). Don't take that 'crimestopper' job, of course, unless you are a policeman, but tell them who they are. If it is the state church of England which is the cause of all the evil, then there is not any briton who is a member of the church who is not a representative of their national program. If you are a publisher, don't publish a new series modelled on my letter - that only makes you less safe: Publish a book on the dubious origin of e.g. Laxdöla saga instead and include some observations on the rich resources of ancient and medieval parchments and papers and ink in the british archives of the 18th century. Or a study of the cues to Hitler in the old norse history: Is there is a connection between the old norse/icelandic 'kau-pang' (the local business centres in those days) and the 'kau-derv-elsk' (= 'fridge of nonsense') on Hitler's 1924 postcard which at least up to 2003 must have been well known in at least the Eidsvig family? ('Gå, mann!' Bergen is the friendship town to the lithuanian Kaunas, though). That is the sort of story which the britons can make much politics out of, and if it is found to be the dirt it looks like, one can - and should - throw it back where it belongs. Otherwise the publisher could start feeling uncomfortable and nervous and could try to find helpless solutions with copying my letter or submitted material in other publications in order to 'please' the britons and hope the best.

Cannibalism, pederasty, terrorism: Those who run those nazi programs probably believe that "this is proven since long and we know what we are doing: We know that cannibalism enhances intersubjective telepathy". That is probably only a tragic misunderstanding of what the collective historic consciousness is: If this common consciousness wants some telepathy to take place, of course it does it without problems. But that is not because of the human flesh - it is rather because people must learn to be mature and independent before the global community can continue its development of the new information technology - the new knowledge. "Cannibalist telepathy, is that what you think is the key to the new information transmission? - Ah, that's no problem - that we can easily make - that we can easily prove for you", says the collective consciousness (called 'CC' in my novel - giving me some really nice car numbers) untill we can leave the puerile uncertainties behind and can continue with the real matter.

The meetings with Celan and Sachs reflected in the MLR. The Kennedy assassination

It seems that Celan visited me in Odda on 3 September 1960 and this was reflected in MLR Jan 1961. Similarly, it seems that July 1963 tells of a visit from Sachs and one can guess that it would have been in the late spring 1963, for example when I was on my way to or from kindergarden in April or May - I suppose I had started kindergarden at that time since I was there for quite a long time and we moved away I think in early 1964 or thereabout. So it is likely that I had started kindergarden in the spring of 1963. The Kennedy assassination could have been a result of this 'tragic flaw', as MLR calls it. MLR January 1961:

1. The authorship of 'Meditations on the six days of creation' and the 'Meditations and devotions on the life of Christ'. by Catherine A. Owen
2. The significance of the Pan legend in Rabelais's thought. By A.J.Krailsheimer
3. Jules Romain Pasticheur. By A.E.A.Naughton
4. Geography of fact and fiction in Wolfram von Eschenbach's 'Parzival'. By Marianne Wynn
5. Death by water: or, the childhood of Wilhelm Meister. By H.M.Waidson
6. The reception of Fritz Reuter in victorian England. By John S.Andrews


1. invokes the title of John William Grover (1878): "Conversation with little geologists on the six days of Creation, illustrated with a Geological Chart" in the british library. It is a near syllable-by-syllable parallel to the title in MLR Jan 1961 - which means that the real authorship (fathership?) belongs to John Grover. Owen's article starts: "Since Miss Wade, in her edition of the poems of Thomas Traherne, attributed these two works to him, it has been necessary for those who wish to write about Traherne to decide with what degree of confidence that ascription can be accepted". 'Thomas Traherne' could be a variant of 'Paul Celan' or 'Paul Antschel'.

2. The Pan legend in Rabelais' thought could partly be about Celan looking in through the window, and then somebody must have seen him outside there, or it simply emerges from his Meridian lecture, and the reflex of this in-looking comes with Gröver/'Mengele's out-looking more than a year later, partly it can be about a deep psychological analysis of my 'rabbel' - childhood drawings on paper - after the visit. The analysts may have landed on the conclusion of PAN. Cp. also PAN AM of 1988. Most notably, Sachs was introduced by Enzensberger to the Holmqvists in March 1961: Some sources claim that Bengt Holmqvist had been in personal contact with Sachs since 1950, others ('Briefe der Nelly Sachs') that he had lived in Sweden since 1950 but had personal contact with Sachs only since March 1961. Pan is the greek god who is the son of Hermes - hence he is a Hermes-qvist = Holmqvist. Which means that if Pan really represents Gröver/'Mengele' and Celan with out-and-in-looking of window, then the introduction of Sachs to the Holmqvists could be put in relation to Celan's visit to Odda - in the sense of Gröver/'Mengele'. See below on the Kennedy assassination - and the importance of the relation to the Holmqvists in the later postcodes and Tanto-lunden construction. 'Holmqvist' can be seen to be a vague reference to the outdoor loo, a 'twig' on which people can sit, hence to 'John Gröver' - and to the 'holmoak' on which the Madonna revealed herself in Fatima in 1917. See also 4).

3. 'Pasticheur' = 'pass deg sjöl': If somebody says 'watch out', 'take care', 'get away' or variants of these, the reply could be 'pass deg sjöl' in the sense of 'take care yourself', 'get away yourself'. 'Skyld paa meg' = blame me'. 'Skylder du meg pass deg sjöl' = 'do you owe me a take care yourself'? This Owen could be in #1 - with the mirror of the window glass in the Pan of #2. Hence it can be seen to be a mirror image of #1.

4. The window could have been where somebody looked out and saw Celan talking with me in squatting posture: 'Bæsjer-vel' = 'he is probably pooing', children's language. Eschenbach behind, that means. The 'geo' could once again be the title in #1.

5. The mirror as in #2: MLR seems to communicate that death by water is the theme - as in 1970. Alternatively, a childhood by teacher. Waits on: That is probably Celan waiting outside for me to come out - and indeed I seem to have come out in spite of my young age. That seems to have irritated Gröver/'Mengele' and one could speculate on a post-1970 teaching of me by Celan held prisoner in a nearby house. I don't think there is any reason to believe that this could be the case, but the idea could have arisen from this MLR 1961. Death by water in 1970 seems to have been the story. If 'remote teaching' should have been the case, then the idea could have been that since Celan was so incredibly good at calling me out by remote telepathy ('His Master waits on'), he could sit in a nearby house and teach me his arts after 1970. That would have been the counterpoint to #2 with the PAN window - and that idea could have been contained in the Lockerbie bombing - which left me somewhat disabled and had me stuck to the ground, sort of. Throughout the spring 1989 I got more and more problems. It took me 4 hours to walk around the little Sognsvann lake, a walk of normally half an hour - I simply could not get off the ground. I don't know if ideas in this MLR Jan 1961 could have been a background for that. As far as 'H.M.Waidson' is concerned, I recall an aprils fool situation in Odda (1960-62) when Ragna Gröver told us children that we had to come and see: The king was waiting in the armchair there (with the back towards us). Could be they were reading this periodical at work?

6. I don't know what Fritt Sleuter could mean. I recall Bjarne Eidsvig's 'Sangrova-dalen' from the sixties and Gröver/'Mengele' singing it in Volda. The main teacher Bernt Weberg in the years 1971-73 read Slaughter for the class in the 'class hour' of Fridays. 'Friday slaughter'? 'Free peeing' - as a mirror of 'fri bæsjing' in #4? It is noteworthy that Sachs was acquainted with the Holmqvists in March 1961, and already in June she gets a letter from the Holmqvists in Venice - they write together with Luigi Nono who, they tell, are interested in her things. She had written to Johannes Edfeldt in 1959 that she was surprised about Pergament's music to her drama 'Eli' and that she had expected something more like Nono's recital of text with background music more than outright singing of her dialogues and texts. This is a little strange since Pergament's opera is a valuable work indeed. When I heard it a few years ago, I was very impressed by it and was convinced that Sachs was as well - but when it comes to articulating this appreciation, one somehow lands on the idea that 'this is exactly how a good cultural life should be and one could dream that it would be the average sort of work'. That is an idea which somehow is contained in Pergament's own musical style - not because he himself worked as a critic of music but because he strove towards a non-sensational and purely musical expression. Could be that is what Sachs communicated to Edfeldt - when she also mentions Nono as an alternative. But only a few weeks after the Holmqvists had met Sachs, they were already seated with Nono in Venice - only a stone's throw from Chiesa di San Trovaso - and send her a letter about it. She wrote to Enzensberger about it on 18 June 1961 - and adds that she certainly believes that this is due to 'Fred' ('Alfred Andersch' in Tessin - whom Celan calls a 'Schurke'). One must believe that 'victorian England' is not about 'victorian in-glahn' = 'in-peep', Tessin, cp. Andersch/Andrews, as if there should have been a spy telescope on 'Giudecca' on the other side of the 'lagune' [cp. also the MLR Jan 2009 issue] - the house of Nono in Venice is in topographic isomorphy with Sachs' on Söder (with Reimersholme corresponding to Giudecca) and perhaps even Isegran in the river Glomma at Vaterland in Fredrikstad. And with Voldgaten 1 where I lived in 1978-1980 (and had my work-space where there now is a 'Billa' shop on Zattere - and one can notice that the death of Nono could be in line with british interests in Europe signalled in MLR). Cp. also 3) Jules Romain Pasticheur. By A.E.A.Naughton = skyldes ('is due to') Moses Pergament. By A.E.A.Nono-ton. I recall from Molde in the second half of the sixties that I found a shoebox with a bunch of letters written on metre-long loopaper and asked Gröver/'Mengele' what it was. He told me that it was letters written by psychiatric patients at 'Opdöl' psychiatric hospital. I asked why they were there in the shoebox, and he said that such madness was stopped by the hospital and he took the letters instead of letting them be sent to the addressees. Could be that is where my idea comes from that Sachs had sent me a letter? The story anyhow sent a chill down my spine. The letters were apparently written in despair in the enclosure of the toilet on toilet paper scrolls (Dead Sea Scrolls?) and the writers could have tried to have them smuggled out by the help of Dr.Gröver/'Mengele' whom perhaps they trusted. He worked there for a while in the mid sixties, I think it was.

Anyhow, the interests behind MLR seem to have found themself sufficiently authoritative to decide on life and death, as it seems - which could have been on the basis of some 'irritation' from the Father inside the house that an alien talked with his Son outside the house. Death by water! Otherwise the serious character of the story would have called for some other theories on the fatherhood.

One must take it that these ideas in MLR Jan 1961 are of british state administration type.

MLR July 1963:

1. The tragic flaw: is it a tragic error? By Isabel Hyde
2. The mind's construction: Characters at cross purposes. By W.Witte
3. Davenant exonerated. By J.P.Feil
4. Charles Perrault and 'précieux' prose. By M.J.O'Regan
5. The literary theatre in France. By Laurence W.Cor
6. For the death of Cecchino Bracci. By A.J.Smith
7. Dialectic, 'Passio' and 'Compassio' in the 'Kudrun'. By H.B.Willson
8. Klopstock's correspondence with Albrecht von Haller. By H.T.Betteridge

These articles seem to tell of a visit of Sachs in Molde, and MLR seems to think of it as a 'tragic flaw' - corresponding to the ancient greek 'hamartia' = 'sin' (#1). 'Have Marte' could mean 'Marilyn Monroe' in some sense of it or other, in which case it means Nelly Sachs. I recall Gröver/'Mengele' talked of the concept of 'hamartia' and gave the impression that he had studied greek one summer when it was raining much. He told that there have been many theories on the meaning of this ancient word, but most of them circle around the biblical concept of 'sin'. The first article (Hyde) starts:

"Aristotle, as writer of the Poetics, has had many a lusty infant, begot by some other critic, left howling upon his doorstep; and of all these (which include the bastards Unity-of-Time and Unity-of-Place) not one is more trouble to those who go to take it up than the foundling 'Tragic Flaw'".

Which seems to be precisely the theme of Jan 1961 - that I should have been the child of the Gröver/'Mengele's and there come the troublesome Celan and Sachs and make problems for them by talking to the child. The judgement is harsh. Here it seems to be about 'the death of Cecchino Bracci'. The article (Hyde) ends: "We may at any rate conclude that whatever theory we adopt to account for the precipitation of the tragic catastrophe, it is time that the ghost and the heresy of the 'tragic flaw' be laid finally to rest".

And this periodical is still up and running. Sachs would probably have been 'Hyding' and waiting for me on my way to the kindergarden. 'Tragic Flaw' = 'Nelly Sachs'. And the 'tragi cflaw' of 'nely sachs' rewrites 'isabe lhyde' into 'itla ydelf'. Adolf Hitler!

29 June 1963 was my 6th birthday. If my meeting with Sachs was the background of this MLR, it would have been in perhaps April-May. I remember well that I went alone to the kindergarden in those days, often or normally accompanied by my neighbour friend Jan-Egil Nygaard. Once I pretended to be sick and stayed home and Jan-Egil came back from kindergarden and told they had seen puppet theatre, so I skipped the next day as well and he came back and told they had seen film, both of which were rare occasions of entertainment. It was in the warm part of the year and likely to be around summer, so it could have been after April-May 1963. To go from the home on Stuevollen to the catholic kindergarden there was really only one possible way - at least for the last stretch - and that was through Parkveien, and there would have been some hundred metres or less where one had to walk Parkveien before taking down to the kindergarden. Hyde Park, Witte/Black = Park. Traffic Park. 'Feil' is norwegian for 'error': Tragic Flaw = Nelly Sachs, Tragic Error = Skitur Norge. Davenant was exonerated. By J.P.Feil: In fact 'Davenant' rewrites somewhat to 'Ingvoldstad', in particular since the same rewrite of 'eksonerated' leaves 'M-onsieur a Ted Ke.' (I remember 'Tobben' from Molde 1963, he was smoking in early age, and Ingvoldstad had his house as high as Labråten 58 and could look right in through the windows) and the J/P error applies to the next: Charles Perrault and 'précieux' prose. By M.J.O'Regan = 'parles jerrault and jerécieux jerose by MP Oregon' = 'Parkveien and Jerusalem [a]Dieu by Oregon Pine'. Cp. 'the Lithuanian threatre in Belgium'. Gröver/'Mengele' sometimes talked of 'oregon pine' - a peculiar interest of his in Molde. 'Pine' = 'furu', hence 'furu ore-gon', or 'fluor' and 'furore'. 'Reknes-haugen' was a little hill with a park between the home and Parkveien and I think I went that way now and then - one would come down from Rekneshaugen into Parkveien, if I remember right, but one would in any case have to walk the last metres in Parkveien before taking down to the St.Sunniva kindergarden. Sachs' "Ausgewählte Gedichte" was published in 1963.

I remember in the late sixties I bought a Donald Duck magazine in the shop in Parkveien right where one takes down to the kindergarden - we lived then in the parallel Björnstjerne Björnsons vei on the other side of the kindergarden. It was the front page text "Den som ler sist ler hest" (who laughs last laughs horse/hoarsely) which I found so interesting - a variant of "Den som ler sist ler best" (who laughs last laughs best) - and it could have been about reading 'Paul Celan' in a version resembling 'Donald Duck', secret writing, so to speak. The reading as 'horse' is with a short 'e' in 'hest', while the 'hoarsely' is with a long 'e' - but it looks the same in writing. In which case it could have been about me recognizing Sachs from the photo which Celan showed me in 1960, if this is the story - and if the photo was the one in her 'Sternverdunkelung'. I brought the magazine down to Bj.Björsonsvei 7 and the people there may have sensed what it was about - although it normally would have been impossible for me to leak anything valuable without seeing it hijacked and turned into political power for the opposite interests. The valuable thing would have been that I recognized her from the photo, and this is something which neither anybody close to her or the folks in Bj.Björsonsvei 7 could have known. I have speculated if that could have been a background of Clinton - cp. also 'Donald Tusk' in Poland. See also the front and inside photos of Sachs in Fritsch-Vivié's biography - if the front page photo was taken after a visit to Molde, it could have been about this recognition which she could have sensed (and she could even have got the story under four eyes from Celan in Stockholm - cp. the letter to his wife about her sign of the ring with her fingers and the mention of the 'light' - although a story under four eyes would not have been necessary for her to recognize it anyhow), and one notices a certain vague similarity of Gro Harlem Brundtland in the photo on the first inside photo in the biography taken probably at the same time as the one in 'Sternverdunkelung'. This could have lent Brundtland some affinities with both Sachs and Celan from the moments when I could have met them (1960 and 1963). Today one would typically have used a 'plastic bag' = 'plastikk-pose' for hiding the book which he could have showed me in Odda, cp. 'the Paust case'.

7. Dialectic, 'Passio' and 'Compassio' in the 'Kudrun'. By H.B.Willson - could perhaps have been about 'Gudrun Harlan' and hence Gudmund Harlem. However, I vividly recall the event in the bathroom when I was soaping the sink and Ragna Gröver asked from the kitchen what I was doing and I answered: 'Jeg vasker vasken' = 'I wash the wash [= sin-k]'. I was[h] the sin[k], cp. the 'hamartia'. For Passio and Compassio. There is also the story of Harlan walking Sachs home the first time they met (1929) and returning the next day for getting her forgotten umbrella.

8. If Klopstock = Stockholm, then 'Klopstock's correspondence with Albrecht von Haller' = Stockholm-åndens perrong/xerox/xylox with skroll on Verlag = Dead Sea Scrolls, cp. Thoursie back from east Berlin 1947. Which means Molde = East Berlin. There are two letters from Sachs to Thoursie in her 'Briefe der Nelly Sachs': One of 25.6.47 and one of 25.9.47. The first is soon after his return from Berlin with a copy of her fresh book, the second is after there had been a little too much stone-throwing from Söder boys on the windows in the house, perhaps as if pebbles were raining towards the clouds above. A sort of 'schulklopfen' with Albrecht von Haller?

If this MLR of July 1963 is about the meeting with my mother in Parkveien in April or May, there is a peculiar correspondence in the January 1963 issue with an event I vividly recall and have written about on this website earlier. I had been out playing with neighbour girl Anne-Lise on the lawn outside and came running in and there stood Gröver/'Mengele' with a strange look in his eyes - as if he had seen us through the window glass - and I found it best to run out again since it occurred to me that it was not timely to come in right then. It was the look in his eyes which was the memory. The MLR January 1963 issue contains in fact some traces of this short story:

1. Chaucer: Motive and mask in the 'General Prologue'. By Ruth Nevo
2. The sources of 'L'Ecoles des Femmes'. By W.D.Howarth
3. Le Comique du personnage de Dom Juan de Moliere. By Roger Laufer
4. 'La Pythie' and its place in Valery's work. By A.R.Chisholm
5. An early poem by Klopstock. By H.T.Betteridge
6. Shadows, reflections, mirror-images and virtual 'objects' in 'Die Künstler' and their relation to Schiller's concept of 'Schein'. By Marie-Luise Waldeck
7. In memorian: Josef Körner († 9 May 1950). By Robert L.Kahn

One could guess that Gröver/'Mengele' had practiced remote control from the window: "Teach the boy some tricks" he would have mental-thought toward the girl, and so she did, and then "now run into the house" to me, and there I came. I recall the slightly glassy (or even enamel?) look in his eyes before I ran out again. Which means that Gröver/'Mengele' could have practiced 'remote telepathy' towards Stockholm (Klopstock) - thinking shadows and virtual objects and things like that. Or when he ran out, I ran in and vice versa.

In MLR July 1963, there is the idea that Nelly Sachs has committed a grave error, a tragic flaw, and although 'Davenant' would not be blamed for it, the article concludes that it is time to end the story definitely. It means that if - or rather when - Sachs was murdered in 1970, there is the idea that it was because she had been in Molde to meet me.

But if that was the REASON, it could be that MLR Jan 1963 tells that the reason could be found in Gröver/'Mengele's telepathy on Stuevollen. If this story was the REASON, it was also 'an-ledningen'. Or 'vann-ledning' = 'the water channel'. Anne-Lise, v-ann-ledningen. Could be Gröver/'Mengele's telepathy was by moving the gear right and left and so did the child[ren] move out there.

MLR April 1963 contains 7 articles: 1. 'The Dynasts' reconsidered. By Roy Morrell 2. Cain and Abel in the 'Mystere d'Adam'. By William C. Calin 3. Gide and Hellenism. By Helen Watson-Williams 4. The poetry of Pierre Reverdy. By Martin Daniel 5. Towards the understanding of spanish romanticism. By D.K.Shaw 6. Folk ritual and the Minnesang. By A.T.Hatto 7. 'Lapis Orphanus' in the imperial crown. By Estelle Morgan We lived on Stuevollan between Glomstua and Bekkevollen from I think the summer 962 to the early spring or summer 1964. There was one early morning when it was a rather light night that I was woken up and had to come and see something strange. I was taken to the other side of the flat, to the kitchen window which faced towards the parking lot and garbage containers, and a peacock stood there in the early morning. I cannot remember the time with any precision but recall the feeling of a light spring morning - which suggests that it could have been in April-May. If the arrival of Sachs was known or even planned by 'politics' in advance, this peacock - which normally belonged to the park or 'Romsdalsmuseet' at Rekneshaugen, if I remember right - could in principle have been put out there for me to see in the early morning. It would then have represented Gröver/'Mengele's peacock or 'joystick government' in 1962 - to take the place of Sachs. It seems that MLR April 1963 could have been all and only about this peacock in the early morning - for a responsibility claim on Sachs' arrival - possibly even in advance. The first title could have its interpretation years later in the TV series 'The Dynasty' apparently about the Gröver/'Mengele's. The seventh and last article could insinuate that I were the pearl in the crown jewels of the british empire: That means the jewish-genetic diaspora and their philosophical traditions which the british nazis tried to coup. The fourth and mid article suggests partly a 'reveille' in the early morning, 'spjaera' out of the bedcover = 'dyna', partly a 'reverche' of 'Pierre' which then means 'a rape'. 'La Piss Orrhanus' = 'La Piss or Anus', as seems to be the poetic logic in the magazine. It would have been the mystery of sexuality - but lifted from me to Adolf Hitler in the sense of the rape of me in 1957 when Adolf Hitler could have raped the 'crown jewels' - and it has its interpretation in the name 'Isabel Hyde' in the next issue, of July 1963. But there is also the interpretation of this in the chronology of Sachs in psychiatric custody: After she and Celan had met in Zürich and Paris, she went back to Stockholm and had a visit by Gudrun Harlan and collapsed and was taken to psychiatric hospital where she remained untill January 1961. In March 1961, which is 2 months later, she is presented to the Holmqvists and soon thereafter taken to hospital again and remained in psychiatric custody untill September 1961. Now she had a few months outdoors, in her home, and then in 1962 she was once again in psychiatric custody from February to December. In 1963, she was free from custody from January to May - and on 31 may 1963 she wrote to Elisabeth Borchers that she must once again in hospital. It seems that she would have been in Molde to meet me in April or May, probably may, and then back in psychiatric hospital again. This could be part of the 'rape' of MLR April 1963, unless it be extended to the Kennedy assassination and later her own death. She wrote the second half of Glühende Rätsel II in these months - and it may be that the poem "Jeder Schritt näher zu dir" is about meeting me (der Meridian) in Molde. She remained in hospital untill August 1963 when she was released and out of hospital for some years. This means that - except for the period from September 1961 to February 1962, when I lived in Odda - there were not any chances for her to meet me since she met Celan in Zürich (and he went to Odda in September 1960) before this period January-May 1963.

Then follows MLR July 1963 which tells of the home-made MLR 'declaration of end' on 'Tragic Flaw', and then October 1963 announces the Kennedy assassination in advance: That means that JFK = Nelly Sachs and the REASON for the assassination was in Gröver/'Mengele' masturbation while watching me and Anne-Lise through the window. The fourth = the mid out of the seven articles in October 1963 is "Water in 'Sylvie'. By R.Chambers": It is the innermost secret about the Kennedy assassination - which is traced to this moment of masturbation on Stuevollen in Molde in probably the summer or autumn 1962 (I do of course not remember the time for this event with any certainty but guess on 1962). 'R.Chambers' is the one who has the control by masturbation, 'Hard Rambers' = 'Johng Röver': It is his water in Sylvie and it means that he is the one who has the authorship = fathership (conventional, but the masturbation story is 'genetic') to the crown jewels of the jewish-genetic diaspora and that is the REASON for the Kennedy assassination. That could be also why the nazis are so persistent with claiming that Gröver/'Mengele' or even Hitler is my genetic father, see MLR April 1957 (with Hitler as the one who apparently comes with the genetics in 'a rape'). See Sachs' letter to Enzensberger of 21 January 1963 - the swiss composer Heinz Holliger (a student and friend of Pierre Boulez, she writes) wanted to write music to her play 'Der magische Tänzer'.

All this story seems to be british intrigue. Sachs in and out of psychiatric hospital, murders and fraud and violence. If they plan to repeat the success with me, for couping the crown jewels of the jewish-genetic diaspora, please throw that dirt back on the britons. Tell loudly what are the plans. Please tell the whole story since these years of the sixties loudly and do not respect that sort of politics. Sachs was perhaps all too patient with the political intrigue-makers. She seems to have destroyed some manuscripts and letters in January 1963, according to the timeline in 'Briefe der Nelly Sachs'.

Gröver/'Mengele' as the Great Masturbator (or is it called 'masterminder'? Cp. article "The mind's construction: Characters at cross purposes" above) who can remote-control people's thoughts and behaviour to an extent of an assassination of the american president. It was Gudmund Harlem who was norwegian defense minister at that time and controlled the guns, and there are cues to the norwegian administration in the socalled assassination. Which means that it was under the control of Gudmund Harlem. But that means Gudrun Harlan in the summer 1960, in this mythology. That gives the reason for the article #7 in MLR July 1963: "Dialectic, 'Passio' and 'Compassio' in the 'Kudrun'. By H.B.Willson". If 'Klopstock' = 'Stockholm' = 'Nelly Sachs' and her correspondence included the letter to Enzensberger about Hollinger and 'Der magische Tänzer', it could be that there were some things going on in the literary theatre of France - in Paris with Celan, for example, such as the accusations from Claire Goll on his alleged plagiarism of Ywan Goll's works, in those days. The death of 'Cecchino Bracci' by 'Granny Smith' is likely to be about the 'Kennedy assassination'.

The conclusion is that the Kennedy assassination seems to have been a pretext theatre for giving 'reason' to coup the crown jewels of the jewish-genetic diaspora, as though with a goodenough conscience. Ridiculous that is - as if the conscience were not aware of the intrigues and home-made character of the theatre in another part of the same self.

Gröver/'Mengele' masturbating, looking out through the window in Molde 1962 after Celan had looked in through the window in Odda, and it was the 'Great Masturbator' who was the REASON for the Kennedy assassination. When his 'water' also was considered the REASON for Nelly Sachs visiting me in Molde, she and Celan were probably murdered in 1970 for lending their genetic authorship to me - and that means that the Great Masturbator Gröver/'Mengele' was credited with the author-/father-ship to me as the crown jewels of the philosophical traditions of the jewish-genetic diaspora. In fact all the apparent murders of intellectuals around 1970 could perhaps be traced to this 'Kennedy assassination' of 1963 on that background: It would be the claims that the WATER belonged to Gröver/'Mengele' and that was my genetics and therefore Sachs/Celan and the others were blamed for it - to the effect that the blame for the murders of the intellectuals around 1970 would be dumped on me - which means that the jewish-diaspora's genetics of 1970 would have small chances to feel welcome in the public world. Which again means that if Gröver/'Mengele' were a secret agent for England, and/or Hitler was, it is meant to land the 'crown jewels' on british hands. The 'Tragic Flaw' = 'Tragic Flow'. See her poem "Immer noch um die Stirn geschlungen" with the "O-A-O-A / ein wiegendes Meer der Vokale" ('Horizont der Krankheit' etc) from Glühende Rätsel II, written probably in the spring 1963 or earlier: It could have been this poem which was used for modelling the idea of 'Tragic Flaw' vs. 'Tragic Flow' as if she worked on behalf of the british intrigue-makers and wrote this poem for the MLR project. It is likely that the announcement of Sachs' alleged secret agency for the nazis is planned to reach the public only after a long time - and then one can pull up this poem as a proof of her involvement in the Kennedy assassination. Some secret agents could have been into her home and borrowed the poem without her permission. I hope that is not what they are doing with my authorship for the time being, or in general. I have this funny feeling of having a pirate leg these days. I am not involved in intrigues on the balkans. Or maybe Sachs sensed the O-A in Molde - as for 'Malte', Rilke's only novel. I think the Lockerbie bomb was going via Malta, or at least there was some cargo stories there.

5. The literary theatre in France. By Laurence W.Cor - likely to be an early responsibility claim on the death of Charles de Gaulle = Laurence W.Cor leaking the story of the literary theatre in France. Kennedy's 'car accident' in 1969 would thereby signify Gröver/'Mengele's masturbation in 1962 as the REASON - which in 1969 could mean the reason for the deaths of Adorno, Celan, Sachs, de Gaulle, Szondi, Horkheimer etc. - in short, the war against the intellectuals. Hence it need not mean a 'car accident' of Thoursie. The trip by car to Aure-Osen with me in the back seat would be about that idea of me contained in the 'car' of Gröver/'Mengele'.

My official uncle Per Eidsvig married 'Marte' in probably 1963. Whether she was Marilyn Monroe or not, and of course she need not have been, it could have been about this 'hamartia' in the article by Hyde in MLR.

There was also the colleague doctor Nygaard (father of my kindergarden friend) in the neighbouring house in Molde - he was a gun enthusiast and I remember him shooting out through the window on a tree outside. Could have been the hidden part of the story. Notice also the 'J.P.Feil' of MLR July 1963 relative to the apparent name of 'Leif Stene Johansen' in October 1963: 'Feil sten er på Hansen' = 'feilen er på Hansteen' = 'Viggo Hansteen', the first norwegian shot during WWII. Hence 'we go' = 'an error'. I think Gröver/'Mengele' mentioned Hansteen as early as in Odda, which means before the summer 1962, if it were not later. I recall a 'Viggo Hansteen's gate' and my inquiry about who that was. Could be it was later.

With such traditions, there are good reasons to close down the MLR - the very 'crown jewels' of british scholarship. Read for example that article by Isabel Hyde of 'Englefield Green' (the lawn with me and Anne-Lise and the m-Engele-feel through the window?) on the 'tragic flaw' in July 1963: "To begin with Aristotle's pattern play, the Oedipus Tyrannus, it is evident that the 'hamartia' of Oedipus is, as Bywater had indicated, an 'error' which consisted of Oedipus' ignorance of his true parentage". Etc. Referring to Butcher and Bradley (see MLR #1), she cannot find the 'flaw' but finds the word 'tragic' used: " ... the fundamental tragic trait". That is how the 'scholarly' article goes by way of double talk with hidden threats of murder and fraud - and apparently insinuations about my involvement in tragic politics but not in the authorship. It seems to be the political terrorism and fraudulent attitudes which constitute the marrow of the article. That sort of dirt belongs in England and not with me.

It is called INTRIGUE and not politics. But this sort of intrigue seems to be totally constituting for english and american reality. Then it is not permitted to keep these things secret. Lenin's revolution may have failed and Hitler's british nazism won instead because people respected the secrecy of that sort of intrigue. That cannot be permitted. One cannot let the whole world's culture go down only because a few persons in UK/US have put a stamp of secrecy on the documents or elements of the intrigue. They are trying by illegitimate means to take somebody else's place by way of an intrigue which is supposed to pretend that they have the right to it - and that they try to obtain by way of keeping the dirty intrigues secret. Somebody else has something valuable and they want it - that is the whole story. Without paying for it - ins't it that simple? There is no reason to respect this any more than one respects a thief who on somebody's behalf has stolen the purse of an old woman in the street. If one sees or knows about this, one tells of course to the police who stole the purse or who paid for the theft if one knows about it.

There are reasons to believe that british and some US administrations can be planning a new holocaust. It is not permitted to allow for such politics.

The analysis of the Kennedy assassination via Celan in Odda, Gröver/'Mengele' masturbating in the window 1962 and Sachs in Molde 1963, is supported by the edition 'Ausgewählte Gedichte' which Enzenberger made of her poems in 1963. This collection contains the poem "So steigt der Berg" which is published in only this collection. It is Enzensberger's postscript which tells of the background with Gröver/'Mengele's 'hardon' as the origin - in concert with Sachs - for the socalled Kennedy assassination. Enzensberger writes about her poetry as 'gross und geheimnisvoll', and 'Grösse ist von älterer Herkunft, sie kann auf Taubenfüssen gehen'. I had this book with me when I lived for some weeks in the 'hobby' room in Labråten 58 in 1986 - and it is likely that it was then that Gröver/'Mengele' asked me - in that room - what the format was called which was used for some latin editions (he had read 50 pages of that format of doctor latin for his medical exam, he said). I later found that he talked about 'Teubner' pages, and he seemed to handle something in his pocket. "So sehr aber Grösse an der Person haftet, nicht nur am Werk, so wenig ist sie exklusiv; sondern im Gegenteil nicht zu denken ohne ein Moment der Stellvertretung. Sie tritt ein für die andern und deren Sache; aus ihrem Mund spricht mehr als sie selbst. Jene Sache ist aber namenlos, nicht ausgemacht. Damit hat das Geheimnis diese Werkes zu tun. [...] Von solcher Art sind die Gedichte der Nelly Sachs: hart, aber durchsichtig". Could be the 'Grösse' behind the 'Geheimnis' is Gröver/'Mengele' masturbating with his 'joystick' in the window. I would not say that her poems are 'hard', though. Enzensberger quotes one of her poems: "Da schrieb der Schreiber des Sohar / und öffnete der Worte Adernetz / und führte Blut von den Gestirnen ein". To take this quote as a declaration of adherence to a verboten Dr.Mengele-chemical program would be very mistaken. There are reasons to believe that the plan for the future is to declare Nelly Sachs for having been a secret agent for Hitler - and that it was Hitler who wrote the poetry and she only put her name under. If the Lockerbie bomb went via Malta, it could even have been for this 'O-A-O-A' in her poem written around the time of a visit to Molde.

This role assigned to Gröver/'Mengele's 'up' in 1962 for international politics could have been a part of the background for the death of Jörg Haider on 10-11 October 2008 if that were made for adding to the election campaign of Obama. Condoleezza Rice could have been the reason for the presence of Anne-Lise in the neighbourhood of mine in 1963. Cp. 'v-an-ledningen' etc. (In 1988-89 I lived in Bregneveien in Oslo). Then the apparent british national responsibility claim announced in terms of 'lost control with a hard drive' a day or two before the death of Haider could have been a case of british state terrorism as part of a program of 'fucking Austria' for 'walking ad'. The 'walking ad' - with board in front and behind and with straps over the shoulders - could even have the function of the 'feature-conversion' in the encoding of Ragna Gröver in MLR April 1929. Could be even for the IBAN & BIC AFFE in San Pantalon.

It was Enzensberger who introduced Sachs to the Holmqvists in March 1961, after which she quickly was put into renewed psychiatric custody. Did she have any friends who were not in some sort of political-affiliated relations? The Celans were certainly not representing anybody else, and one would believe that some of her poet friends in Sweden were not either. But it is likely that her interface to society was about as controlled as my has been. Whether I got a 'third [or even fourth!] eye' or not in 1982, the telephone terror 1986-88 would not really have stimulated my social performance much. Sachs collapsed after having visited the Celans in 1960, for whatever reason, when Gudrun Harlan was in Stockholm.

The birth of Ragna Eidsvig

This birth on 12 May 1929 should be in the MLR April 1929. It certainly is. Here are the article titles:

1. 'Young Mr.Cartwright'. By Eleanore Boswell
2. The interpretation and probable derivation of the musical notation in the 'Aucassin et Nicolette' MS. By Clifton Joseph Furness
3. Pierre de Peckham and his 'Lumiere as Lais'. II. By M.Dominica Legge
4. 'The battle of Maldon': Some danish affinities. By B.S.Phillpotts
5. The middle high german 'Adam und Eva' by Lutwin and the latin 'Vita Adae et Evae'. By A.C.Dunstan

The first issue of MLR in 1905 started with the title "Some notes on the comparative study of literature. By G.Gregory Smith" and started with the line "The late M.Gaston Paris...", which includes the M-'oyster farm' of Eidsvig. This issue of 1929 starts with the title "Young Mr.Cartwright" which is a correlate to this first line and then continues with the first line "Betterton and Nell Gwynn excepted[, we seem to know remarkably little about the actors and actresses of the Restoration stage]" which hence correspond to the first title of 1905 "comparative study of literature". Young and late, Mr. and Monsieur, Gaston and Cartwright. Similarly, Comparison and Betterton, study and Nell, literature and Gwynn. The opposite of 'Young Mr.Cartwright' = 'old Miss Eid-svig' = 'miss Ragna Eidsvig'. For 3) 'Pierre de Peche-ham' (cp. also the 'Ehamgasse') = 'Fjell-gat[t]a' while '72' = 'settante-deux' = 'sett-an-te-dö' = 'seen/put-him-to-death' which is the opposite of 'Lumiere as Lais'. Since 'Ålesund' = 'eel-strait', the strait where the eel passes in and out, hence the strait = straight of Adam in and out of Eve, hence the 'middle high german' of Adam and Eve, if you understand what I mean, with the 'sund' = 'strait' between England and France in terms of the bilingualism. Then one guesses that 4) = 'the Klipra connection' when 'klipra' means 'cliffs-off', 'scissors-off', or even 'kli' = 'bran' hence 'battle' plus 'pra' = 'Mal'-done. The 'bran' will even have affiliations with 'malt', could be for the fill-pots. Could 'Eleanore Boswell' be the same reference as 'Elinor Rigby' of the Tintoretto in San Trovaso?

Only the second title I cannot easily get down here. If she took her father's title as her name, it means that Ragna Eidsvig's real name should be 'disponent' or 'oyster farmer' or some opposite-valued form. Bjarne Eidsvig was a passionate inventor - a Klipra-local 'Edison' - and spent a lifetime in trying to invent the 'music-sheet-turner' (cp. 'Some notes on [the]' and 'musical notation') = 'noteblad-venderen' = 'snu-bla' = 'stumbled'. Stam-bred? (Crimes-topper?) Her 10 year younger sister Marit is alarmingly similar to her - it sometimes occurred to me that they could have been monozygotic twins - had it not been for that time interval. 'Mareritt' = 'nightmare', cp. the semantic feature-conversion in the definition in MLR. Ole Devold founded his textile factory = 'tekstil-fabrikk' in 1852. 'Stamen' is defined (Oxford dictionary) as 'the warp of a textile fabric' or 'the thread spun by the fates at a person's birth' or 'the supposed germinal principle or impulse in which the future characteristics of any nascent existence are implicit', which hence could be about a misunderstood interpretation of the Tiepolo Madonna on Zattere (photographed by me from the postcard sold in the church) not far from San Trovaso - could be even for a Snorri Sturluson of the icelandic saga world! There is an incredible social depth in that painting - if one looks at the thread in the hands of the virgin Mary and then at the space between the two saints, it shows a living space which was what european jewishness was about before the quasi-'christian' attack in terms of nazism flattened it and left the world as a binary-symbolic-logic flatscreen TV reality. Tiepolo is very much about just that jewishness as a basis for christianity, such as I see it - and if the name-function of Ragna Eidsvig Gröver has been in that 'thread' of social depth, it would have been just in the name of 'Snorri Sturluson' who is credited with a good bulk of the icelandic literature of the middle ages. Snorri was murdered by Håkon IV, according to the mythological history which perhaps has its origin on the desk of Alexander Pope and his contemporaries - his name Håkon is about that chin which was Hitler's swastika ('hake-kors') and which could have been a reference to me, in particular if one adds the 'IV', something which would be about the role assigned to me via Modern Language Review April 1957 as the son of Hitler who flattens out the lives of Jews. In short, the meaning of the name of Ragna Eidsvig, interpreted as a potential principle of power in that 'british' interpretation, is telling of british power-making at the cost of jewish culture and social life, quite simply. The Royal Oak? The gap of 'princess' (see title #5 under MLR October 1971 above)? If 'Clifton' means 'klipra', I notice the alleged childhood title of Ragna Eidsvig as 'Klipras solstråle' = 'the sunray of Klipra' - cp. 'crimestopper'/'Christ-mobber'. For 'Aucassin et Nicolette' MS. By Clifton Joseph Furness, one notices also the idea of Rothmann's king size for the 'fumes' or even 'Fumiani' - that is not a cigar type for the 'chain', as far as I know. Since Ragna Eidsvig had two mid names - Ragna Augusta Devold Eidsvig was the name she got at the time of her birth - the 'gust of devil' could be contained in title #5. This warship ('warp-is[h]'?) Royal Oak was sunk some 10 years later, apparently - in combination with the Oslo Report - as a british responsibility claim on the holocaust. Hence it seems that the reading of these article titles is the following: 1) The name, 2) the 'title' or 'purpose' somehow, 3) Fjellgata 72 = the street address, 4) Klipra = the local region, 5) Ålesund = the town in Norway. The 'title' in 2) could perhaps be about the concept of 'Christ-mobber' or 'crimestopper', perhaps as some anglican peculiarity which is not shared by the Vatican.

In short, not much doubt what this MLR is about.

Nelly Sachs met Gudrun Harlan in 1929. I don't know if it was before or after the birth of Ragna Eidsvig. 'Gud-tru[e]n[e] har-lan[da]' = 'the naive one [the one in good faith] has landed'. Good run, hard landing etc. The story tells that she walked Sachs home and forgot the umbrella and had to come back the next day to get it. 'Regen Schirm Handgriff' could perhaps be taken to be significant of 'Ragna a-gust-of-devil Eidsvig' - but only if Harlan were an agent. I don't know if she was. Clearly if she would have been an agent, that could have been a part of the breakdown of Sachs after her return to Stockholm after the visit to the Celans in Paris - and Harlen visited her in Stockholm for a longer time at her return.

Is 'Gudrun Harlan [Dähnert]' the meaning of the first names of the authors? Clearly 'gut-tron hard-lang' is about the same theme but with the opposite value as in the 'eidsvig' name with its 'bismak' of untrue marital relations etc. Eleonora clifton joseph M dominica B S A C - could be one could see something like that in those names.

The London Poetry Society moved to Betterton street I think in 1997 or 1998 (the year when I was there). I think it was while Paul Muldoon was its president or leader or what it is called (could have been the reason, of course). Which could suggest that they are considered a 'Comparison' society (also by this 'feature-converted' reading) = 'George Harrison' society = 'Hare Krishna' = 'Ha-Rekustad'/'hard recursioner' (cp. Harlan returning to get the umbrella) = 'Ha-Martia' = the article in MLR after Nelly Sachs was going to Molde to meet me in 1963 as basis for the Kennedy assassination - but then one has to ask whether they are for or against, so to speak. It was Per Eidsvig who married Marte. Or maybe one simply must conclude that it is a british society which thereby inherently replaces Sachs with Eidsvig and that's it (it is time-consuming this strategy of assumption on basis of a no-answer attitude). I anyhow did not get an answer from them when I sent my emails to them in 2000 and maybe that is their point. It could mean that they are supposed to integrate into my authorship but do not answer my letters. Scriptures of London Poetry Society vs. black-and-white tigers of Nandan Kanaan Zoo? But then it could be about that 'title' of #2.

The names of the authors of the articles in MLR April 1929 are likewise telling of this 'conversion' mechanism: 'Ragna Augusta' could convert to 'birth march' (taking 'ragna-rok' to be the end of the world, the existence) = 'Bismark' (her father?) or simply 'Boswell': Snorri Sturluson = Eleanore Boswell. 'Devold' converts to some sort of divinity, which perhaps 'Furness Legge' = 'furne/fume-slegge/sledge' etc could be about. 'Eidsvig' = 'eit svik' = 'one treason/betrayal' which converts to 't[r]o-fast' = 'true' (in a marital sense of it), or 'two-faith' for 'to-fis' = 'toe-fart' (may be on the right tracks here?) = 'dunst-a-n' = 'gust/smell of it'. Hence the opposite of the name form comes out as a gust of betrayal in the marital relations, the very opposite of Tiepolo's painting of the virgin Mary on Zattere - and thereby the very opposite of that social depth in the constitution of the human reality which jewishness was about as it expanded in european-continental society in the 18th-19th century before the attack from british interests in the holocaust. With 'Snorri Sturluson' as the essence of that converted form of the name, and with the necessary understanding that it was all a bunch of lies if the icelandic saga world was made in London in the 18th century, even before Tiepolo in Venice, the converted form of the name tells of a war against the social unity of jewish communities and faith. Then it makes sense as a political strategy against the jewish-genetic diaspora when England pulled out of Palestine just in time for the new state of Israel to be forced to declare its independence at a time which put this birth of Ragna Eidsvig in the mirror image around Kristallnacht: That temporal strategy would declare the state of Israel as an enemy of the jewish-genetic diaspora's social life and faith and would seal this strategy with the two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki = Bjarne Eidsvig and (the 'salon-fähig') Adolf Eichmann. Is that the Bis-marck? He was born on 1 April 1815 (the year after the liberation of Norway 1814) and died in July 1898 (the year before the birth of Bjarne Eidsvig) and was the founder of the german Reich.

Such strategy of flattening out the social jewish world - or even the poetic depth in the social space - for pumping opposite-valued political power out of it can be seen in the phenomenon of the hypothetical relevance of Gro Harlem Brundtland and Bill Clinton in the 'Parkveien' element - if that is about something, however small, that was shared between only Celan and Sachs and me and which nobody else could guess, not even a person standing next to her, even though they could have guessed that Celan had showed me a photo of Sachs. Then there would have been a little left and that is what the world of politics would have tried to pump more power out of. Gro Harlem Brundtland was chief of WHO while I was in the psychiatric hospital 1999-2000.

I sent my poem "The flooding" from "I tell you, Estunates" to London Poetry Society in I think 2006, before it was published, on a postcard with my own photo of the border tower at Hegyheshalom - and the british defense ministry (I think it was - same as the one with the lost hard drive before the death of Haider) released, possibly even before the postcard had reached the society, a video showing harsh methods for training 'royal marines' - the trainer knocking down one of them. At that time the britons could not have guessed what sort of context the poem was meant to be in - and if the video can be taken to be telling of an attack on the meaning of the poem, it is telling of what could be a fundamental and spontaneous reaction of a british-minded type after all these years of systematic 'holocaust philosophy' on the island. In particular if this even was the background for the death of Haider. The hebrew parallel text tells the story. But this is something which could not have been guessed in 2006 - it would have had to be 'sensed'. 'What arises in their minds' - but then it could be about a certain paradoxicality. They could not have guessed this parallel hebrew in 2006 - but if they attack with that sort of intuitive spontaneity, it could perhaps have been the same sort of mechanisms involved in the background of the attack on Gaza 2008. The hebrew has an interpretation also in my novel 'The Dreamer' - in a 5-page date entry telling over about 2 pages the story of Anne-Lise in 1963 and ending with the words: "I had a feeling that I had solved the mystery". But this could not in any way have been present to the british minds in 2006.

This series of titles in MLR April 1929 anyhow seems to be a proof of the character of the periodical. It could be the core of what the britons believe in. A dangerous and fanatic sect, that could mean.

It is very mistaken to believe that the story of the earthquake in Greece.

The bombings of Moscow in September 1999

It was in the autumn 1998 that norwegian prime minister Bondevik felt that he needed some psychiatric treatment and was hospitalized at Modum Bad Sanatorium - with some obvious echo in Modern Language Review. I don't remember exactly when this was but found a reference dated 1 September which suggests that it was some days or at most a few weeks before the MLR October 1998 was issued. Then in September 1999, a year later, there were the bombings of apartment blocks (buildings) in Russia, most of them in Moscow, leaving hundreds of dead. Shortly after the last of them, deputy prime minister Anne Enger Lahnstein resigned and said she would not return to politics again (she hoped to find something else to do), and Blair took Peter Mandelson back into the government again after he had resigned with 'scandal' in the Christmas after I had sent a manuscript to legal deposit in England (the receipts were delayed while Mandelson resigned and arrived in the new year with a notice of excuse for the delay), and Jimmy Carter came on a quick trip to Norway and told that he had expected to get the Nobel Peace Prize after Camp David but his hopes had failed. He mentioned in talks the situation in Sudan, China, Irak and Burma before he travelled on to Holland and Mali.

There are various possible interpretations of this. I don't remember when Lahnstein was prime minister, but it must have been during the sick leave of Bondevik. She was normally minister of culture and education, I think it was, but was for a period also minister of oil - and when suddenly Bondevik fell ill she had to take even this office and controlled a good portion of the government for a few weeks. Then her sudden leave from politics in late september 1999 was a surprise - in the middle of such a successful career - and people may have wondered if it could have been related to the bombings of Moscow, which would have been a not so well thought through political move if that were her ideas. The most likely interpretation of this is that the political performance would have been about the british control with Norway in the 1-2-3 construction. And Carter's talk and MLR October 1998 are suggestive of the view that it was my name that was indexed in the bombings. Nobody would probably suspect Lahnstein of having organized the bombings as a 'smart trick', but it did look like, sort of. My guess is that Mandelson back in government after his 'sick leave' since my legal deposit would be telling of british interests in the bombings. Since it has been shown somewhat convincingly that british state terrorism exists, one could jump to the conclusion that the Moscow apartment bombings of 1999 was british state terrorism, quite simply, and that is what Lahnstein's resignation meant. 'An angel land-sign/stone' or 'an english landmark' tells of 'british state'. Buckingham?

But why? The October 1998 MLR tells what could have been the reason - and may well have been. It seems to be my Endmorgan Quartet which I had completed in a 3-volume edition in the summer 1998, and I then thought that it was finished. I wrote in my Pilot Study: "I then thought that I would collect the three-four books in one volume and made this in the summer 1998 - with copies to the legal deposit libraries and to Poetry Library in London". This was the Pilot Study I completed in the autumn 1998 and sent to legal deposit in England. Ted Hughes died on 28 October 1998 and Peter Mandelson resigned from his post as Secretary of Trade and Industry in December 1998. I got a delayed receipt from Smail's agency I think in the new year 1999.

It is MLR October 1998 which tells that the plan could have been to coup my Endmorgan Quartet from the summer 1998. It was then a 3-volume edition - and today it is finally completed in the 16-volume edition. Here are the titles of the articles MLR October 1998:

1. Non-Petrarchan Kitsch in Romeo and Juliet. By Robin Headlam Wells
2. Stage devilry in two king's men plays of 1606. By John D.Cox
3. From taboo to totem: Black man, white woman, in Caroline Auguste Fischer and Sophie Doin. By Roger Little
4. Long-lost manuscript: The true antecedents of professor Lidenbrock, his nephew Axel, and their glorious adventure underground. By William Butcher
5. On writing, reflection, and authenticity in Sartre's Carnets de la drôle de guerre. By Andrew Leak
6. Leopardi's philosophy of consolation in La ginestra. By Pamela Williams
7. Documenting the history of spanish theatre: Fuentes para la historia del teatro en España. By John J.Allen
8. Rafael Alberti, Maruja Mallo, and Giménez Caballero: Materialist imagery in Sermones y moradas and the issue of surrealism. By Robert Havard
9. Heroic variation: Cervantes, Guillén, and 'Noche del Caballero'. By Elizabeth Matthews
10. The unknown soldier and the return of the fallen: The political dimension of mourning in german texts from the first world war to the present. By Malcolm Humble
11. 'Unbeschreiblich köstlich wie die Liebe selber': Food and sex in the work of Irmtraud Morgner. By Beth Linklater
12. The poetry of Rudyard Kipling in Soviet Russia. By Katharine Hodgson

There are clear traces of my The Endmorgan Quartet in titles 10 and 11, and the mirror images of 2 and 3 tell of 'Ragna Augusta Eidsvig' as 'Caroline Auguste Fischer' (and Sophie Doin = John Gröver?) plus the missing Devold in #2. (There is a 'Sophies street' in my diary novel from 1994-95). Article #4 is about Jules Verne's "Voyage au centre de la terre" - could be as a pendant to Celine's "Voyage au bout de la nuit". Celine/Celan. The author claims to have found a new intro to the manuscript in Heritage Book Shop and refers to some material of Nantes 1981. The newly found manuscript folio presents, according to the author, in the opening lines interesting data on 'Königstrasse' after deletion of 'Firlanderstrasse', cp. Gröver/'Mengele's 1970-71 address 'Kongensgate 8' vs. 4-land-strasse and hence '8ell4', as if there were Hitler's signature under the newly found manuscript - which one otherwise can trace somehow to my 'newly found manuscript', presumably 'Cat-Rufus' earth', which was completed with the little pamphlet called "The Endmorgan Quartet" in June 1998 - after which Erdogan in Turkey seems to have been launched for his career up to president. This '8ell4' seems to mean that the plan of the british nazis can either be to launch the idea at a later stage that my work was written by or for Adolf Hitler and/or lend to me the role of the 'Octooon' - one notices also the school built in the late sixties or early seventies called 'Octogon', Hauge, Vesteröy, Hvaler (cp. 'oct-ell-vir' zipping with 'bonket röy' - cp. 'Reinhard Bonke'?). Title #2 seems also to contain a reference to the Great Fire of London in 1666 - as if there should be a great fire of me with the disappearance of he curl on top of the mid o: 1666 vs. 16o6. John Dick Ox. This top curl could perhaps be compared with the handle of Harlan's umbrella - and hence ideas about 'cast lead' etc. 'John J.Allen' could be telling of such ideas - as if it be about a 'Dreyfus'. Would non-Petrarchan mean me as Eisenhower #6 vs. #7? Sartre's 'Carnets de la drôle de guerre' could even be about Zattere's old horse (end-morgan) of the 'Droll Guerrer'.

The following places in mainly Moscow were bombed in 1999, with hundreds of dead:

- 31 August: Manezh Square shopping centtre near the Kremlin. A note was found allegedly from "Union of Revolutionary Writers" who seemed (but not really, according to their leader who said they were not involved) to claim responsibility, with the message (according to CNN): "A dead consumer's unfinished hamburger is a revolutionary hamburger. Consumers: We don't like your way of life and it's unsafe for you". Manezh Square = squaring of the circle = Kremlin-stopper? Shopper/Stopper? Crimes-[s]topper = birth of Ragna Eidsvig of MLR 1929

- 9 September: Guryanova Street no.19. ''Guryanova' is similar to 'John Grover' and to my childhod fantasy friend 'Gori'. 'Guryanova ulitsa djevjatnatsat' = 'John Grövers ulykke det var natt-satt' and hence it could have been about the peacock at night on Stuevollen in Molde 1963 = Gröver/'Mengele of MLR April 1963. It would not have been the same window (rather on the other side of the house) but the same house.

- 13 September: The house at the interseection Kashinskoye Shosse (no.6) and Varshavskoye Shosse. 'Kashka' = Norw. 'kløver' (clover), and 'kasha' = Norw. 'grøt' (porridge), together 'grøver' as the former spelling of my name, and the porridge alludes to 'ronk'. 'Var-' is a morph which clearly represents 'ronk' = 'masturbation', including 'beer', 'mitten', 'variation', 'milk boiled in oven' etc. However, in the context of the peacock of #2 it may well represent 'Parkveien Donald Duck' = Bill Clinton, Gro Harlem Brundtland, psychiatric hospital 1999 = 'tri-natt-satt' = the beginning of the 3rd millenium. 'Kashinskoya Shosse shest' = John Gröver's c-hest with Varshavskoye Shosse = Parkveien - there were lots of chestnut trees at the entrance to the road down to the kindergarden. Then it is about the 'laugh last laugh best/hest' = Shosse Shest etc.

- 16 September: A truck bomb in Volgodonnsk, outside a block of flats. Could be about 'John Grover', 'Vaagstranda', 'Valgnatten' = death of Jan P. Syse on the election night 1999 - hence probably in September 1999?

- 4 September: This case - which I here for categorization reasons list as #5 even if it really is #2 in the series - was in Buinaksk in Dagestan = Boy-Naked Dagger-Jan = John [B]jarn-egg Røver = John Bjarne Groever, etc. Also, 'bøynakke' is 'bent neck'. There could be some traces of title #4 from MLR Oct 1998 in the story of DD who sat bent over his LISP books next to me - for the date 3 September 1960. The street 4 September - day of the bombing - runs out along Boulogne-Billancourt in Paris.

It is Jimmy Carter's talk about Sudan, China, Irak and Burma which could allow for the conclusion that it be about 'self-sucking', an advanced exercise which could be telling of british interests and which requires some 'bent neck'. 'Kjempe-syse' could be 'kjempe-suge' = 'giant suck' for Sudan and China. When Irak and Burma is the theme, one could think of the Moscow bombings as representing the bottom or 'Burma' and Manhattan 11 September 2001, few hours after the election in Norway, as 'Iraq' - for a 'giant suck'. Then it would be about sitting on the bottom of Russia and sucking the twin towers of Manhattan in an attempt to get the 'money' from USA to England - which perhaps was obtained with the Abr-Eham monster money transfers of the autumn 2008. Cp. also the royal massacre of Nepal as 'british state terrorism' with me 'stuck to the ground' after Lockerbie - with 'british logic' as if I should have 'satt fast i bakken/baken' = 'stuck to the ground/bottom' like a cork. When the 'blocks of flats' were bombed and hence 'opened', it would be like taking out the cork from the behind which thereby would release the Fart = me in an MLR sense of it trying to get out for a liberation of the poetry etc. Publication. The blocks of flats would be the corks and the bombs would be the Fart. This british logic could be a way of saying that The Endmorgan Quartet should be published 'on the other side'.

It is interesting to compare these five bombings of 1999 with the five election pledges of New Labour from 1997 (see above): Clearly if one takes into account the swapping function of 'Augusta Devold' in MLR April 1929, one could say that bombings 1 and 2 correspond to pledges 2 and 1, for the 'dirty beast in the revelation'. Since pledge #5 seems to be about 'no land of milk and honey', and since Carter talked about Sudan, China, Iraq and Burma before he travelled on to Holland and Mali, one could take the latter two to be about 'no land of milk and honey' which thereby would be bombing #5 if the scheme corresponds to the 5 election pledges. I don't have enough data to get bombings #3 and 4 into the same scheme but maybe that is a likely hypothesis. It would anyhow mean NEW LABOUR of Blair - and Mandelson who was back into the government the Monday after Lahnstein resigned on a Friday in Norway.

The sum total of this would be about a giant 'turn-of-the-millenium' terrorist program for hijacking my authorship - including Moscow 1999 and Manhattan 2001 - for a giant selfsucking Abr-Eham monster who lifts the money and resources from USA to England. It's not me. It looks quite simply like british state terrorism.

If it is, then one should find traces of this scheme with the targets of the bombings in MLR July 1999. That seems to be the case:

1. Ethics and revolution: Lukács's responses to Dostoyevsky. By Galin Tihanov
2. Boundlessness beyond boundlessness: The sea, drink, and form in Malcolm Lowry's fiction. By Greg Bond
3. Bunting's Briggflatts: A quaker masterpiece. By Stefan Hawlin
4. Sugar and spice and all things nice: From oriental bazar to english cloister in anglo-french. By William Rothwell
5. Proustian metamorphosis: The art of distortion in A la recherce du temps perdu. By Edward J.Hughes
6. From riches to rags: Tournier and the world outside the text: A review article. By David Platten
7. Music and memory in Natalia Ginzburg's Lessico famigliare. By Nicoletta Simborowski
8. Heros, survivors and history: Edgardo Rodríguez Julia and Puerto Rico's 1898. By John D.Perivolaris
9. Was Garcia Lorca Dyslexic (like W.B.Yeats)? By Andrew A. Anderson
10. From taboos to transgressions: Textual strategies in woman-authored spanish erotic fiction. By Jean Gilkinson
11. Internalization and death: A reinterpretation of Rilke's Duineser Elegien. By Torsten Petterson
12. Images of alterity: Second-generation turks in the federal republic. By By Rob Burns
13. Stanislaw Lem: Socio-political sci-fi. By Carl Tighe

There is some mirror symmetry: Tihanov = Tighe, Greg Bond = Rob Burns etc. Lem / Revolution = Ronk Röver = british. It looks as if there is Ronk in the second half and Röver in the first.

1 and 13: the Crimes-[s]topper paradox of squaring the circle: Ethics = square while revolution = round. Lukacs = Crimes and Dostoyevsky = the Stopper. Tihanov = Mr. Silence, but Galin = Wrong. Not silence = bombing. The paradox of crime-stopping = socio-political sci-fi. Stanislaw Lem = stand is slaw-lem = Man is [s]quare.

2 and 12: Images of alterity = sea, drink, and form = Gröver/'Mengele' masturbating in the window. Second-generation turks in the federal republic = a gust of septic-ember = the törk generated in a second behind in the federal republic. 'A-oristos' can be the proper interpretation of the 'boundlessness' and the 'Malcolm Lowry'.

3 and 11: Kashinskoye Shosse = masterpiece quaker, Varshavskoye Shosse = Bunting's Briggflatts = Parkveien. Kassen-sköye = funeral in a coffin = internalization and death. Vars-hav-skue shosse = Rilke and the angel of Duino. 'Brigg' is an non-alcoholic norwegian beer.

4, 5, 9, 10: Could be a butterfly mix a la 1 and 2, for the concept of 'no land of milk and honey'. Jan P.Syse = kjempe syse = det var J huge = Edward J.Hughes. Recherce du temps perdu = shestnatsaty'? Volga[donsk] = Proustian [metamorphosis]. 'G-arsia lock-a' as a 'dys-licky' with 'butler' eyes in the home = Buinaksk in Dagestan. Sugar and spice and all things nice etc. Or does that mean a 'Trut-Hahn' (click here for a excerpt of the 2007 government in Austria - from a public presentation ad) = doctor Winckler's dinner in film the 'The third man' = professor Winckler's finding of the hittite cuneiform = 'Hitlerite' language spoken even before hebrew in Israel - hence 'Hitlerite' as the language of 'Paradise'? This Winckler finding seems to be the first issue of MLR - which could be about the semantics of the angles. (By the way, there is a 90 degrees angle going from Tiepolo on Zattere via San Pantalon to Tiepolo in Chiesa SS.XII Apostoli - but the angle is a little out from the San Pantalon church, closer to Campo Santa Margherita).

One notices also the 'Duinaksk Bagestan' = 'Duineser, pack your luggage' = 'Pakistan'. Then indeed 'Bena sier Bhutto': A heavy way to go that is, to the endless nightmare of verboten. Boundlessness beyond boundlessness: The sea, brink, and foam of Duino - in a british poetic fantasy.

If bombing #5 in the above list - bombing #2 in the temporal series - in Buinaksk in Dagestan served the purpose of representing the concept of categorization, one notices the inherent reference to Boulogne-Billancourt not so far from where Celan was found in 1970, ten years after he had visited me in Odda - after which I talked about my friend 'Gori'. One notices also Al Gore as Clinton's vice president, and if the idea is a concept of verboten mistreatment of Celan before his death, as a general subject of categorization, this categorization of 1999 would share reference with 11 September 2001 in that sense of it. It would mean a link from Moscow to Washington via London - cp. the typing errors on Hitler's 1924 postcard: M/L, D/C, B/R. Article #5 is about 'the art of distortion' and the mirror image - article 9 - is about dyslexia. Those typing errors would of course have been done on purpose - by Adolf Hitler presumably for the british Labour government of MacDonald.

6 and 8: If Labråten neighbour Ingvoldstad (not 'Winkelstad') on the other side of the street is referentially recognized as Thoursie (not 'turkey') in some sense of it or other, and if there was a surveillance camera on my childhood window there, one can recognize 'Tournier and the world outside the text' as this surveillance camera idea and perhaps an 'Edgardo' of a 'John D.Perivolaris' in some late evening. There seems to be some reference in the two titles to the conventional and genetic mothers of mine: To 'patten' and to John Dippery Volaris = Sachs' 'Sternverdunkelung' published in Vienna. There is the idea of 'the vole of my enda' in #8, cp. 'the mole of Vienna' - and Treholt had reached the same administrative level of 'byrå-sjef' as Ragnar Thoursie reached when he was arrested for espionage with Vienna proof. 'Heros, survivors and history' = 'byrå-sjef i Varshavkoye Shosse'? The two names of 1898 tell of the 'bis-mark' of death and funeral = the intersection to Varshavskoye Shosse - which means Kashinskoye Shosse. Puerto Rico = Ruerto Pico = whipped self-picked whortleberries = Edgardo Rodríguez Julia = red gardo odriguez jule, ja = red whortleberries etc. for whipped whortleberries = Vibeke Gröver peeping in the window in Labråten 58 when she found the door locked on her return home in the late evening = 'Lockerbie'. Gröver/'Mengele' told this 'funny story' at the dinner table in Fjellgata 72 in the late sixties - about the man who whipped an enormous lot of self-picked whortleberries with an outboard motor in a barrel but it was shaking so much that he had to place it in the bed and the barrel disintegrated and the dangerous monster was spinning red berries and white down and feathers all over and he finally had to shoot the dangerous and fanatic mo[ns]tor. It could be an allusion to the making of a 'third eye' (in older days they probably drilled a thin hole and whipped a little) or the effect of Mengele chemicals in the blood - the plans told at the table and 'everybody laughed'. One meets this idea now and then that it was about his plans for Celan and that is what the peep-in of Vibeke Gröver was about. She asked me to open the door please and I said no, of course I could not let in just any stranger, if she had a passport or something? After a while with this bargaining, I finally went and opened the door. But this idea could also have been a late secret-service interpretation (en 'rass kloppe'?) of the ideas of my late-evening 'Adam-dressed' walk (age 14-15 or so) out the window and up to the side of the house at the door with the lock and back again - a 'John D.Perivolaris' whom the 'service' peeping from a possible surveillance camera could have interpreted as a 'walk in search of the genetic parents'. It could be the same story as 'vindusviskeren' for 'Findusfiskeren' Sigurd Jensen. That is the art of 'conducting' (cp. 'Herbert von Karajan') - you just hop out the window and take a brief walk and back again and then you have a fair overview of what they are doing for the next fifty years. Could that be 'Lockerbie' - based on secret surveillance data for example from a hidden camera? 'Ka shin-skoye [shosse] var show-skoye [shosse]' (= 'what shin-fun was show-fun')? I don't know what sort of 'show' she could have been out to in the evening or if there was a locked door in that film or whatever it was.

Gröver/'Mengele' was member of 'byrå[d]et[t]' in Fredrikstad for a few years. Arne Treholt and Ragnar Thoursie were 'byrå-sjef' in norwegian and swedish ministries. 'Rags Riches' = 'Rag-naG-röver', cp. the 100.000 kroner ('hun-dret-U-senk-roner') offered me from Ragna Gröver on Clinton's inauguration day in 1993, the newspiece of it presented by Tone Gröver who added the comment 'så nå er du rik' - and the later sinking of the Kursk near Murmansk. One should have believed that the 'running' of Clinton was over by his inauguration, though. 'Arne Treholt' could be a name about 'Shelley' and 'Byron' (not 'byrån') in Geneva with the 'Spylgoreih' backwards as a 'spy of Gori'. After Treholt's release he reportedly sold condoms ('selle dongr') on the street in Russia, a sort of 'Dongr Under', perhaps, wellingtons at Zattere, sort of, or rather Shelley's = 'The revolt of islam' = 'Tiepolo of Iceland', as if it were about exporting british interests to USA. I suppose the reason why he travelled on to Kypros was not that 'Sorpuke' is not so very unsimilar to 'Zattere'. Sartre was not an agent, I suppose, even if he visited Baader in Stammheim and his main work is called something like 'L'etre et le neant', 'to be an L and Grover John', but maybe Shelley or rather 'Byron' would have been a little 'sore' after his adventures with the two young girls. But for making something out of the name of 'Arne Treholt' in such a context, one would have to move the anus to the front if the grip should be of any interest. 'Tri-natt-satt' could have been about this 'Zattere' phenomenon. In which case the 'Union of revolutionary writes' (the 90 degrees angle of the 'L' - the 'Third man' Winckler - from Apostoli to Zattere goes in a curve which includes San Pantalon) could be about just this story. But this means that when the hieroglyphs are british interests, the interests in the story seem to be british - and those seem to have been exported to USA. But if british interests also were exported to Russia by the bombings, there is the Moscow 1999 and Manhattan 2001 bridge inherent - and, strangely enough, it seems related to the complex around Treholt. Since Cyprus is with initial 's' in english, one could spot also certain british interests in bombing Stephansplatz in Vienna - and that could be another aspect of the bombings in Russia. It is the third stanza of Shelley Canto I, about the wellingtons on Zattere: "See! the lightnings yawn / deluging Heaven with fire, and the lashed deeps / glitter and boil beneath".

7: Then what is title #7? My guess is that it could be about my PhD dissertation, the fifth and last part of it called 'A waist of time' on speech signal analysis (the stream of time tended to run in mirror symmetries) - for a model of music and memory mistaken as a 'christmas present' to the university for the normal rejection and the nicotine of symbolism, something like that. The model tells of how linguistic symbols can be recognized in speech signals. It would mean 'doctorate' - and could be the hospital in november 1999 and the corresponding WHO of Brundtland. The dissertation was rejected in the end of July 1998 after which followed the twin bombing of the US embassies in Africa 12 years after the alleged death of PAS. The twin US structures provide for a further link - via this mid point - to the twin towers of 2001.

In fact I passed a group of three britons in Venice in March 2009 and one of them said to the other two when they passed me: "It is a waste of time" and another of them replied: "Absolutely!" Is that the plan - a 'cast lead' of 16o6 and things like that? Man is [s]quare = Manezh Square near the Kremlin? I suppose it was a coincidence. If it were not simply a way of saying 'no state of Israel' or 'no jewishness'. 'Cast lead' 2008-2009. The british dream is likely to give shape to body of living and dead under an administrative control of life lenght.

If Parkveien is where I met Sachs in 1963 and that is the 'Varshavskoye Shosse', then the hospital of the 'doctorate' could be representing my meeting with Celan outside the hospital in Odda in 1960.

Conclusion: It seems that the bombings of Moscow in 1999 were quite simply another case of british state terrorism. And the name of it may have been Modern Language Review. And then the plan is to take that 'british' state which conducts such terrorism? Is that 'Cast lead'? Well then I am in the zwischenpapier role again. The terror in Moscow looks british, not jewish, and can hardly be a goodenough reason for taking up persecution of the Jews. The bombings of Moscow seem from the present data to be correlated with Manhattan 2001 in which case it could have been about making a british Kingdom of the Universe which spans from Turkey in the east to Manhattan in the west and for which the pump is constructed by Mengele - with underground information flux running together in Paris from where it is lifted by AIDSHIV lift over the channel to London. Little England could of course not behave like that if they were totally alone: It is the interests of international secret service - basically UK and US democrat party, it seems, plus nazi power interests elsewhere - who try to construct such a kingdom of pure power. Russia responded to the bombings with blocking for the Loop passage around the Black Sea.

It seems that my authorship is used for constructing such a terrorist program. I must repeat this over and over again: I do not work for terrorist politics and I am not an agent and my authorship is not for such political purposes at all.

There was my legal deposit with receipt delay in late 1998, Mandelson's resignation, the bombing of Moscow and the return of Mandelson. In 2008 there was the absence of receipt and Gusenbauer's resignation in Austria. What happens next? Are there plans for giant terrorism after which follows Gusenbauer's return to power? If the britons really constitute a dangerous and fanatic sect, such as these Moscow bombings and other data could indicate, one must hope that they do not plan weird things on basis of my "Estunates" - which I really should not have sent on this background but it was unknown to me in 2008. I completed the book (the three first parts of it) in Athens in April 2008, after having worked with the correspondence with the music in March, and wrote in the opening line of the postscript: "This is a book about beauty". At the end of April, in the greek easter, I was completing it and was planning to send off the first copies - when I came across this ad in an Athens street on 25 April: It seems to say 'competition about beauty by 'Fam[ily] Labråten' - it is sponsored by Pfizer (!) and, whose logo seems to resemble a torn anus ring, and 'Cheltenham Festivals' (Bayonne? Christmas Eve?). Adolf Hitler! 8ell4! There were other signs in the advertisement around the same time (an ad for a club singer - I had to ask what it was for and was told that it was a club singer - with only one ratio of two integers as telling text - it was telling for my book) which told me that my work on my computer could have been tapped and the data circulated in at least advertisement and perhaps business. With the present data available, one can conclude right away that the chance that British Council has made use of secret surveillance data from my computer for arrangements on basis of swindle definitely is present: It would have been for presenting the idea that the book is created by the family in Labråten 58 in Fredrikstad - and hence the holocaust death camp machine which seems to be the driving motor in postwar british reality. Maybe they plan to claim that they were first and I had seen this ad and therefore I wrote this line? Or maybe they quite simply are so crazy - dangerous and fanatic - they they had copied my manuscript by way of secret surveillance and given it to some 'competitor' in England for claiming that s/he wrote it first? That would be SWINDLE and one can probably jump to the conclusion that such activities are within the scope of what can be expected from the state of England. Dead Sea Scrolls etc. They probably want to create the impression that my work is written by Adolf Hitler's penis. It would mean the end of any chances to work on a computer. (All the poetry in 'The Endmorgan Quartet' was written by hand, though, and for the last book the handwritten notes were typed into my computer in December 2007 and March 2008 - and finally the very last part of it in the late summer 2008 - only the postscript was authored on the computer keyboard). Russia expelled one British Council from the country around the same time in the spring 2008, I think it was.

My book was finished in late April and I sent some copies by post in early May 2008. For example, I sent a copy for registration in the copyright office of Library of Congress on 2 May. I don't remember exactly when I sent the 6 copies to british legal deposit but it was likely to have been in May or at the latest it was before I left Greece on 20-21 June. It seems that the beginning of the end for Gusenbauer as chancellor of Austria started in the end of June, after I had sent my book to legal deposit in England. I have still not got receipts for the books from A.T.Smail's agency. British library responded that they considered the books donations and not legal deposit.

'Recep Tayyip Erdogan', current prime minister of Turkey who started his political career in the summer of 1998, if I have got it right, which means soon after the three first parts of TEQ were completed, is a name which rewrites from Sachs' poem 'Die Stunde zu Endor' from the time when I must have been conceived from her egg: 'Die Stunde' handwritten upside down looks like 'Ayyip Retsep' and 'zu Endor' rewrites to 'Erdo-ga-n'. This could in theory have been a background for the bombing of [g-]Rafic Hariri. But the symbolism of the egg is a work-internal semiotic principle which can be seen to apply to the first 15 books of my TEQ: For example, the distributional semantics of TEQ #14 is a function of the distribution in the first 15 books, which took 8 years to write, but I have not studied it relative to the inclusion of the 16th book which took another 3 years to write. The first 15 books make for a big 'globe' or 'Erdball', a universal 'egg', to which the 16th book provides the function of the poet-muse relation. But this is not the 'Stonehenge' function of a burst anus-ring which the British Council symbolism could have presented even before my book was finished, as if I were the 'bjarn-egg röver' and they were some 'Adolf Hitler' - a political interpretation which perhaps could be derived from the name of Erdogan in Turkey relative to the work of Sachs from the fifties. (The video on royal marines training from the british ministry in 'response' to my postcard to the Poetry Society tells of very serious problems in british administration: They get an idea which pops up in their heads and apparently start attacking this idea with administration long before they know what it is - that is when this 'war against the intellectuals' turns dangerous and fanatic and a ridiculous farce of 'competition' on the type 'we were there first' in the sense of having attacked it immediately). This question of poetry vs. politics can be seen to be inherent in the bombings of Russia in August-September 1999. It was on 17 October 1995 that I got an address in Tallinn on telephone from Bergen and some days later sent a letter to this address and included some lines from the beginning of my novel "The Dreamer". The semiotic principles in my TEQ are anyhow self-contained and are not a function of political manipulation, and political or international-secret-service administration has no rights to my authorship. Political manipulation based on my TEQ must be considered an attempted hijacking of my authorship. It is getting more and more difficult to work with computer-written manuscripts if even a draft to a book is tapped by secret surveillance and subjected to political manipulation and installed into administrative structure as if the intellectual property were the property of the political administration. Then a lot of time must be spent afterwards with searching for dirt and throwing it back to where it comes from. It is somewhat of a tragedy for my authorship with all the time spent with writing this web page after all the 'involvement' into my poetic authorship as it has progressed since 1997. Neither is it possible to write such a work through many years without a continuous publication of its parts. Has one seen a bigger dirt than these bombings of Russia? It seems to be urgently important to dig up as much british dirt as one can find and throw it back to the island outside the continent. I have done my part of that work - and have been forced to write some 3-4000 book pages of dirt on the internet since 2004. That is a lot of wasted time when seen from the viewpoint of my authorship. British administration is a problem. Clearly much damage may have been done by my good faith in the official version of world history that the britons were 'anti nazis' who rescued the world from the tyranny of Adolf Hitler. It is extremely important for the future of the world that this demagogic myth of the britons as 'anti nazi' be taken down and the true version be told. There would probably never have been two world wars and never a holocaust had it not been for british administration.

One wonders naturally how much of the upper part of the administrations along the Black Sea Loop could be under british control - they still enjoy a lot of false confidence due to all that historic propaganda and many people support british policy because they believe in the opposite of what England with its war against the intellectuals and war against poetry represents. If all of the black-sea-loop areas are under british (international-secret-service) control, then it is hardly possibly to prevent the outbreak - since people evidently do not have the slightest idea of what this is about. Where is the outspokenness?

Wherefrom did I get this idea of 'Sir Adolf Hitler' into my mind? It recurs now and then with some convincingly suggestive force. Could be that is all they have left in England after all these years. I never got an explanation to why the Gröver/'Mengele' family went (by airplane) to London in 1972, I think it was, but there was one day in London when Gröver/'Mengele' was absent for other and somewhat mystic errands and the rest of the family was in the Museum of natural history.

There were news on 17 March 2009 that there had been a coup on Madagascar, the island outside the continent. If this represents madness in England, I can report that I do not feel mad due to gases or a 'gas coup' and the madness does not apply to me. I am not 'talking gas' and I am not british administration.

The bombings of cotton mill dormitories in Hebei, China, and the murder of Laurent Kabila

Sachs was operated in her abdomen in 1953 and in 1969 - the last time it was about removing a part of her intestine. My 1970-71 teacher (shortly after her death) was called 'Jan-Roger Ulfeng', cp. 'var en roger rulleseng' = 'ja-an fager rulleseng', cp. 'fager er Lia' = 'Njaals saga' (?) and possibly even for 'Elias Mevang' as 'a Li a smed-vang' = the sideboard-Smith (the Schengen inheritance Smith) which seems to have been indexed in the Hebei bombings in China on 16 March 2001, with a possible source in my novel of 10 September 1994 (immediately before the 11 September excerpt). There is a 2 month interval between Kursk and Cole 2000 when these converge on the concept of 'dirty beast in the revelation' by way of indexing the official dates of birth of my official custody parents. These 2 months are the same interval as can be seen as installed in the following year by the murder of Laurent Kabila (16 January 2000) - possibly for 'lå og ronka bila' as in my diary novel text - and the bombing of the cotton mill dormitories (cp. also 'Beowulf' rescued from the library of Josef Cotton) in Schijiazhuang in Hebei in China (16 March 2000) - the latter word HEBEI is central in a fragment of the date 10 September 2001 in my novel but possibly also representing 'H-bay' for Ragna Gröver's birth-name 'Eids-vig' ('bay' = 'vig') for the AIDS-HIV lift over the channel. The relevant excerpt from 10 September 1994 in my diary novel is the following (the date entry for 10 September 1994 is 11 pages in the book and this is only a short excerpt which perhaps can not be properly understood without its framework) - it is the first and main mention of the 'Hebe trailer' in the book:

10.9.94: [...a few pages...] Now I certainly had come into the 'featural mood', and I went to wash my clothes in a launderette. Having put in the clothes, there would be some twenty minutes to wait, so I went for a stroll outside the launderette. As I slowly went around the block of houses, a beautiful young woman comes against me just before I take to the left. Having gone a little a down the street, I notice that she is following me, and as I once again turn to the left into a closed street, she still follows me and comes up beside me. Having just passed me, she goes into a house. I cannot help feel attracted to her beauty and charm, and as I slowly continue along the street, and once again turn to the left, I stop in front of a car with a small trailer attached to it, of the open sort to transport small things on. I notice first the name of trailer written on a sign on its sideboard: It says 'Hebe släp'. The last word is Swedish and means 'something trailing' (the root of the verb 'to drag'), the former is a name only. I then see how this name has been formed: It is an acronym for Hertzberg (that is, HErtzBErg), as it is written with smaller letters on the sign: 'Hertzberg's smidesprodukter', which again is Swedish and means 'Smith products of Hertzberg'. I am completely baffled by the coincidence with the earlier occurrences not only of Smith and Hertzberg, which are not frequent names in Norway, as well as the Swedish language which I associate with SJ. As I stand there, the woman passes me: She has come out of the house again. I understand: Just as the Persian woman had been associated with Hertzberg's street four days ago, so this woman now is associated with the same name, which means 'heart mountain', here. As she turns around the corner, I notice the telephone number (to Hertzberg smidesprodukter) written on the trailer ( it is 1267677, in Sweden), as well as the name of the steret we are in: It is Wessel street. This was a Norwegian comedy writer living in Copenhagen a couple of centuries ago. However, the name is pronounced exactly as the English word 'vessel', which, in this context, well may be seen as referring to the little open trailer, being a vehicle for transportation.
     I then follow slowly after her, to approach my launderette in the Ullevål street. She is in a kiosk to buy something. I pass it, and remain outside the launderette to observe the machine still running. As she comes out of the kiosk, a former neighbour of mine, the neighbour of the dentist, passes in his car with registration number BC 72121. I have seen this car so often before: It was, usually, the first thing I saw whenever I left the lodging at the dentist's house, and I often associated it with seven plus two times three times seven (7-21-21). I wave my hand to him, and the woman turns around and walks down Ullevål street. I remain outside the launderette. A car with number DF 97773 passes, and then, half a minute later, another car with number BN 66617. Then my wash is finished, and I go in to get it.
     As I go down Ullevål street, she stands at a corner, waiting for a bus. As I approach the metro station, a car passes with number FS 41677. Again, as so often before, my featural intuition tells me that this is the sequence 777 with the first digit decomposed into 16, and it says: 'The session is over. You can go home'.
     There are some interesting patternings in the numbers associated with BC on this downtown trip: There are BC 74666, BC 77766, and BC 72121 (the dentist's neighbour's car). This strongly suggests that 666 and 777 are involved jointly in this downtown trip, as also occurs from these numbers occurring outside the launderette after I had met the woman. In fact, even the telephone number on the vehicle contains these, in an intermixed form, in the sequence 1267677, wherein we can see a 6 intruded into the 777-sequence, or the middle 6 transformed into a 7 in a 666-occurrence. The peak of significance was evidently reached by this trailer named HEBE, which I cannot help associating with hebe-phrenia, in paradigmatic opposition to schizo-phrenia. However, the associations to an interpretation I made of a report by von Domarus (1925) is by now so massively strong that I must put it in here instead of postponing it to a separate chapter outside this diary. It was written a couple of weeks ago, and I reproduce it here exactly as it was written then.

The fragment continues with other relevant and 'trailing' things. The hebrew parallel to this (see the article on my authorship for the principle) is contained in a fragment which can be translated something like "from whose shining star of changing in the 'Hebe trailer'" (or 'trailer Hebu'), which could be about the thread of the Tiepolo's virgin Mary on Zattere, or, by the Mesorah translation, the hebrew fragment can also read "For there was a certain porch at the home of Bar Chavu". Again, this is not something which the bombers in China could have guessed - if the bombing is related to theft of my book it is because it is immediately preceding the 11 September 1994 excerpt and contains reference to such a 'hebe' with 'sideboard' for which the 'Schengen agreement' of surveillance in EU provides for a rewrite into 'enkens skjerv' = 'skjenken arv'. Plus perhaps an 'Elias Mevang' (not 'Vilhelm Evang' of pre-Schengen times - and I notice that, if I remember right, Heinrich Fehlis - cp. the 'svelis' of 'Venezuela' with 'Chavez' etc - allegedly was found dead in 'the bed' = in 'Sengen') for whom the offspring perhaps could be traced to the Eisenhower doctrine #4. That is the world of 'politics'. The real reason is in the mystery I had discovered while I was waiting for the wash to be finished - the 'Hebe trailer' which later turned out to have a precise mention in this ancient hebrew text. And there is the perennial 'smith' there. It is the trailing parts to the quote here which is more precisely about 'hebe-phrenia', but the fragment applies to the quote as well. (My fascination with the trailer would certainly also be about the poem 'So steigt der Berg' of Sachs from 1963).

Whatever the interpretation, there is a HEBE in my text, and in fact even one in the hebrew, and this seems to be the reason for the HEBEi target in China in March 2001 - although only the one in my text would have been available for MLR Jan 2001. It is likely that those who organized the terror would have felt a certain 'enthusiasm' about this HEBE, an enthusiasm which they could have tapped from me - apparently by way of abuse, as seems to be the standard strategy, such as the abuse of this text for these acts of terror - without understanding what it was, as also seems to be a standard phenomenon: A strange sort of 'naivity' which is kept going only by way of terror and which perhaps lends them some sort of artificial 'innocence' which they probably are out for. But that is very expensive and damaging for the rest of the world and one cannot continue to consider that a valid sort of 'politics'. The 'innocence' is due to the nazi parametre 'pederasty' which consists in abuse of the defenseless for lifting its innocence over to the barbarians from the island and dumping the label of 'dirty beast' on the defenseless. There is a british dogma which claims that a person who has been abused by a pederast in childhood will tend to become a pederast himself when he grows up: That means, since the pederast takes over the 'personal innocence', that the pederasty tends to be self-preserving for the pederast and an 'empire of evil' can be built over it for a general concept of self-reinforcing 'principle of power'. The scientific status of the dogma - which can be looked up in e.g. 'Encyclopedia Britannica' - is certainly of a 'third eye' kind.

If Pim Forteyn represented the parametre of 'british cannibalism', did Anna Lindh represent 'british pederasty'?

When my 'TEQ' would be installed by the bombing in Russia 1999 and 'The Dreamer' in China 16 March 2001 and Manhattan 11 September 2001, the effect of the 'communism' could be the intended 'shared ownership' to the authorship, as seen from a british viewpoint, including the mention of the 'hebephrenia' of WHO and the 'tri-natt-satt' of the psychiatric hospital 1999-2000. The plan is probably british genocide by verboten methods in Russia and China. The link from 1999 to Kursk and Cole 2000 to Hebei March 2001 would have served to give a unique indexation of me as the Great Terrorist. What a low standard of politics that is. People really should request new governments and the responsibles impeached. Of course that is how these things should be treated. I think I have shown rather convincingly that it is likely that Bill Clinton was involved in the Kursk-and-Cole and that means the rest of the story as well.

This sort of 'politics' is clearly fumbling in the dark and it hopes in its solitude to be attacked by alien ideas from outside which they can battle in return - in 'the war against the intellectuals'. The whole phenomenon of terrorism is such a tragic and helpless story that one should not try and understand it as 'political'. It is likely to be about the desparate end of the great british illusion since the renaissance.

The british illusion is the one of the type of a sect which apparently even tries to make for the impression that I share their views or work for their tragic programs. I certainly do not.

MLR January 2001 should contain traces of 'Laurent Kabila' and the 'Hebei bombings'. Here are the titles of the articles:

1. Truth so difficult: George Eliot and Georg Büchner, a shared theme. By Sheila Stern
2. The crux in A cure for a cuckold: A cryptic message, a doubtful intention, and two dearest friends. By David Carnegie and MacD. P.Jackson
3. 'Autobiographiction': Problems with autobiographical fictions and fictional autobiographies. Mark Rutherford's Autobiography and Deliverance and others. By Charles Swann
4. Les Faux Miroirs: The good woman / bad woman dichotomy in Racine's tragedies. By Véronique Desnain
5. Imagination and ideology: Ethical tensions in twentieth-century french writing. By Kirsteen H.R.Anderson
6. Vittoria Colonna and the virgin Mary. By Abigail Brundin
7. Poetic discourse patterning in the Cantar de mio cid. By Juan Carlos Bayo
8. The double coding of desire: Language conflict, nation building, and identity crashing in Juan Marsé's El amante bilingue. By Joan Ramon Resina
9. Genius beyond gender: Novalis, women and the art of shapeshifting. By James Hodkinson
10. Time travel in the forbidden realm: J.J.Slauerhoff's Het verboden rijk viewed as a modernist novel. By Jane Fenhoulhet
11. Szymborska's two monkeys: The stammering poet and the chain of signs. By John Blazina

1) George Eliot and Georg Büchner, a shared theme means 'Schijiazhuang': 'Eliotgeorge' = 'a Lit-george' = 'a Schijiazh', and 'BüchnerGeorg' = 'bü-jiazhuang'. And 'Sheila Stern' is a precise repesentation of 'Schijiazhuang'. 11) Jin Ruchao, a nearly deaf man, was accused of and executed for the bombings. Could have been about Jin Rudjao = the Rudyard (Kipling) of some other issues of MLR. Here it seems to be about the deaf man = the stammering poet. Two monkeys could mean that it was a copy of Ruchao who had carried out the bombings - and somebody could have tipped the police about the original after the bombings. Witnesses etc.

2) 'Lå og ronka bila' = 'lay and masturbated the cars' - a 'cure for a cuckold' etc? 10) Slougher-hoff = the masturbation of the 'verboten', and the 'modernist novel'.

3) 'Autobiografiction' = the theme of my diary novel. 9) 'Domarus' = 'Novalis', the women = the ones described in the fragment and the one in Domarus' text. I hope the 'politicians' have not made fools of themselves with mixing fiction and the real world.

4) I recall Gröver/'Mengele' in the sixties talking about 'Vera' as the symbolic name of 'the pure woman' in the sense of 'the woman without a thick intestine'. I think he laughed and may 'Vera Lachmann' was the target. 8) 'Laurent-Desire Kabila' is very easy to recognize in this title #8.

5) About 'dormitories'? 7) 'Cantar de mio cid' = 'cotton mills'?

6) Seems to be about Tiepolo's virgin Mary on Zattere - and hence Ragna Eidsvig (Gröver) vs. Nelly Sachs as my mother. 'Eids-vig' = 'H-bay' = 'Hebei'. Sachs had a part of her intestine removed in 1969 - and in fact Ragna Gröver was to a hospital for some days in 1970 or 1971. A bit of the 'gail' brown had fallen down from the wall onto the floor on Tiepolo's painting - and could here perhaps represent that piece of the intestine.

Is there encoding of the dates? There is perhaps in 4) and 8) a concept of 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 16 Racine (January) and Marse: Folds/false mirror good/bad dichotomy, and "double (2) coding of desire: Laurent Desire conflict / Kabila and identity crashing (1-1) in Juan (2-and) Marsé's". 'Vera Lachmann' spoons to 'Lera Vachmann' = 'laughs at the guard' and I think the first news about the murder of Kabila was that one of his security guards - a bad guard, that would have been - had shot him and the other guard - a good guard, probably - thereafter quickly shot the first and 'bad' guard. Cp. also 'Faux Miroirs'. For the theory that a 'copy' of Jin Ruchao had done it for dumping the blame on the deaf man, there is the 'identity crashing' and 'double coding' in 8). For the name of 'Jin Ruchao' there is also the 'Genius beyond gender' in 9). According to a website, Jin had used taxi between the bombing targets. There is also a semantic/phonological affinity between 'Jin Ruchao' and 'John Gröver', which means that if a 'copy' of Ruchao carried out the bombings, it was a sort of 'John Gröver' who did it.

One quickly guesses what is the theme - it is likely to be that I am a terrorist and Adolf Hitler wrote my works. I am not a terrorist: It seems from these MLR's to be a rather safe guess that the british government are the terrorists. In 2001 it was Tony Blair who was PM. But there was no influence from the british administration on my authorship.

In fact there are traces of the same complex in the MLR issue one year earlier - in Jan 2000, the first issue in the new millenium. I think I recognize the name of e.g. Bodil Stenseth, who was once married to Rudjord, and whom I met for the first time in a flower-bed (roses?) at Frydenberg high school when I think that I was 16. There are some apparent references in MLR Jan 2000 which suggest dates 15-16 January/February/March (cp. the british MI5/MI6) and which could correspond to the phenomenon of 10/11 September 1994/2001 in my novel. And hence MLR 2000/2001. The encodings could serve to converge the complex onto 11 September 2001. 'Bodil Stenseth' could be recognized from MLR Jan 2000 title #4. "Bodily peril: Sexuality and the subversion of order in Jean de Meun's Roman de la rose. By Sylvia Huot". "What? - Grover?" (see section 6). I think I was 16, though, not 15 - and so there is a certain 15-16 there. The mirror article #10 is 'By Xon de Ros'. Title #1 = "Sea voyages into time and space: Postmodern topographies in Umberto Eco's L'isola del giorno prima and Christoph Ransmayr's Die Schrecken des Eises und der Finsternis. By Beate Müller". This seems to be by a 'cot on miller', and the two works are partly about echoic memory (TEQ) and partly on place - and maybe one can spot traces of a former neighbour name. My TEQ was even then very explicitly about 'the form of time' and 'The Dreamer' was trivially about the places where I lived, and these are also very standard and fundamental categories.

Bound into the front of the collected issues for 2000, but I don't know if it could have been in the end of a later issue in 2000, there is also an addition with roman-numerical pagination: "Russian poetry: The lives or the lines? By G.S.Smith" - the presidential address of the Modern Humanities Research Association [who publish MLR] read at University College London, on 17 March 2000. It starts as follows: "I neeed hardly say this, but will nevertheless ask for your indulgence while I do so, that to be elected Preisdent of the MHRA is a great honour for me personally".

These are things which cannot be ignored by the public. One cannot just publish in advance plans about murder of the president in Kongo and bombing of houses in China and things like that and pretend that it doesn't matter. The MLR is still published every third month. That means, to the extent that the periodical announces the terror in advance, or to the extent that it can be taken as a responsibility claim afterwards, that it is the british government who is to be blamed for the terror.

The dangerous and fanatic sect

has its origins in the 16th century with the formation of the anglican church when it liberated from the catholic church by breaking with the dogma of transubstantiation. (Aukrust once mentioned transubstantiation). Catholic dogma tells that - possibly due to the status of the church as a historic revelation - the biscuit and the wine transubstantiates to Christ's flesh and blood in the mouth, before you have got the time to swallow it, but the anglicans rejected this dogma and refuses to take it for anything but plain biscuits and drinks. But then of course they are thrown into existential despair by losing the contact with the divine. For solving these problems, they introduced the principle of reliance on the word - the 'trust me' principle - which emphatically asserts that this is a piece of human or rather divine flesh. How on earth can you believe anything like that if it isn't really? One cannot go to church on Sunday morning and swallow anything as disgusting as that if it is a piece of flesh from the pathologic institute. So there must be another solution. Pederasty is another transformed version on the concept of 'eating the bread of Christ' communionized in the metaphorical sense of recursive 'upbringing', which is the phenomenon with the trick of conventional custody relation (assigned priority above the genetic parenthood relations) which has given rise to the modern phenomenon of international secret service, which means that the act of pederasty represents the childhood baptism - the introduction into the community of a consecrated place, and the 'mune' or 'mouth' is in the wrong end of the child and it is the pederast who is 'introduced', then double negation means that it is the child who is introduced into the community with this humid ceremony. But then one needs a better understanding of what the ejaculated sperm of the pederast represents when it really is the 'flesh and blood' of the body of genetic parenthood relations - such ejaculation as in pederasty cannot give offspring. When it is NOT genetic parenthood but pederasty via the 'celestial orifice' (not to be confused with the consecrated 'ecclesiastical office'), then it is the standard myth of 'genocide': If the communion of the 'eucharist' is about (a portion of) the body of Christ and this is supposed to bring a solution to mankind's striving towards cosmic harmony with nature, then it follows that the body of Christ must be the cosmos or at least the territories within the reach of the british empire (as seen from the viewpoint of the anglican church - is this the reason why one apparently has experimented with moving the colon from the behind to the vaginal opening of a body?). And then 'genocide' means the sacrifice of a portion of the body - representing the 'genetic' sperm of pederasty. It goes into the 'earth' and never gives fruit except in the sense of 'upbringing'. It is this 'ejaculated part of the body' from which the christian faith can interpret the 'transubstantiation' of the normal biscuit and the available beverages (when it cannot take the traditional version of a mystic transformation in the mouth): It is transubstantiated via genocide. Therefore the 'holocaust' thought of as a part of the religious ceremonial feelings of the anglicans. Could be they cannot do without it? Existential despair in an empty and cold universe? Then it is a dangerous and fanatic sect. They tried to hide the remains under the clots of german dust by way of a secret agent, but to no avail: It has been discovered who dropped it there and history must not forget the reason. The 'anglican' solution for avoiding genocide could then be real cannibalism (is that the Oxford movement, a sort of british 'peace movement'?), which perhaps doesn't make it much better. It is when these problems are taken into the construction of a state church that it gets really dangerous and that is when one can understand how such a periodical as Modern Language Review can come about: It is 'justified' by the british feelings that even they have a right to a meaningful life, and it is the state of England who sets this through in the 'space of potential genocides', which means a global scope.

This really cannot continue much longer. Cannibalism was allegedly formerly a solution probably for preserving a peaceful society on Borneo and other areas but even there they seem to have seen the need for restraint when gradually becoming assimilated into the international community. (Or were the rumours about Borneo due only to british missionaries who had been on the island with the telling name?) It is the problem of international secret service and terrorism which cannot be permitted due to religious feelings in a small sect. Dr.Verboten is a sort of 'metaphysical cannibalism' which is perhaps even worse and it is high time to understand that the despair of cosmic chill could in fact be due to some peculiarities in the traditional - in fact monarchic - constitution of the british society. That sort of 'cosmic unity' has nothing to do with traditional poetic universal harmony - it is on the contrary a problem which arises from excessive epistemological loyalty to the crown under which there is only one world for everybody and those who do not fit in there are thrown into cosmic existential despair. That problem can be solved by finding a better organization of the british society - one need not solve it by murdering others. And the 'solution' with massive 'pederastic' abuse of e.g. me is not much better: The problem can be solved by finding a better organization of the society. My novel 'The Dreamer' is about finding a solution to the problem of existential despair, and there is no solution in abusing the book. There cannot be any other reason for abuse of the authorship than plans for a new genocide. But there is not 'sperm' there? There is the nazi 'sperm' of verboten pulley money by IBAN and BIC AFFE. Which of course makes it only much worse if this is supposed to be a new economic system for the whole world, completely driven by genocide. But if there is no real pederasty, only abuse, then there is no genocide either? Then there is only the fundamental principle of competition- and badness-driven economy - in the principle of exploitation. That is the method of dr.Verboten who pumps the spiritual resources of one person over onto another. The political trick is then to say that 'this is not based on genetics' - it is based on conventional custody relations. It is a primitive system anyhow, based on unhealthy relations to a supreme royal crown. The solution is of course not there but in the development of a new poetic logic.

The trick for the whole construction seems to be found in the role of the icelandic sagas and eddic poetry. These are 'on the other side' - just like the mechanisms of a new 'metaphysical' genocide. Anglicanist symbolic cannibalism via genocide is based on the symbolic interpretation of the sperm, while the 'metaphysical' variant of this is the new nazism which is based on the symbolic value of the 'idea' in the mind, not the sperm in the body. The ideas circulate in the historic consciousness of the people and the nazi politicians dream of getting them under control - and then 'anglicanism' in this sense of it can be used for the 'cosmic harmony' when all the consciousness and conscience and ideas of a single person is blown out with verboten chemicals in the blood. The ideas contained in a single mind is a subset of the global historic consciousness and it corresponds to the erasure of a subset of the genetic pool of humans by ordinary genocide. Then it corresponds to the relation between the jewish-genetic diaspora and the world of icelandic saga and its mythological reality. If these 'old norse' literary works - a good bulk or all of it - were written by the Scriblerus Club - for 'refining' and extending the philosophical basis for such abusive politics by way of the 'anglican' basis - there is the chance that Pope and Swift are fictive poetic characters created by the government for getting just the 'poetic solution' - the alternative to brute political power - under governmental control. Quite simply for rescueing the british crown and imperial power by way of the nazi-philosophical solution and preventing the poetic solution. But can we be certain that Antonio Fumiani in Venice in the years 1680-1704 did not work on behalf of the british government and added the Pope and Swift characters to the painting in the last moments before it was finished in 1704, while the Scriblerus Club was still in the planning untill it was started in 1713? Pope was allegedly born in 1688 and it was in 1704 that William Wycherley (1640-1716) introduced him into his literary circle in London. The painting in the ceiling of San Pantalon shows the ascent to heaven, 'going home', sort of: 'William Churcheley'. Swift was allegedly born not long after the great fire of London, in 1667, and was 13 when the painting in the church was started. His first literary work seems to have been published at the end of the century. There exists a proof which tells that Fumiani was not an agent and consequently that Pope and Swift therefore possibly were characters invented on basis of his painting. It is in the phenomenon of Thomas Traherne.

Thomas Traherne (1634/1637-1674/1704?) seems to be a fictive character created by british secret service or administration for imitating the Fumiani paintings (completed in 1704) in San Pantalon, or more specifically the brown figure with the pulley in the corner. 'Hörna' is swedish for 'corner', norwegian 'hjörne', while 'dra' is the pulling. There is also the 'trekker-ne' = 'flushes-down' of Arthur Nedregaard whom I have associated with Arvid Storsveen. Traherne published little or nothing in his lifetime (seems to have been something before his death in 1674) but was 'discovered' with the publication in 1903 after more than 200 years in the darkness, by the finding of a manuscript in 1896 by a Mr.Brooke in the bookeshoppe of Bertram Dobell, who even could have been the origin of the story of Sachs and Thoursie in a car (a smelley 'do-bil') from Molde to Stockholm, later represented with 'Gruppe 47' in Sigtuna 1964 after the article on Traherne in MLR Jan 1961 soon after Celan had been in Odda, and just before the birth of Tone Helene Gröver.

Traherne's father was a welsh shoemaker, a wealthy poorman, sort of, who worked in a nearby village - not in Hereford but in Afford. Neu it wasn't in Big Afford, it was rather in 'Iban' Lugwardine. Thomas had a brother called Philip, consequently for the Adolf Hitler figure at the altar wall with the cup and the horse-hoof as a 'cuneiform'-diagonal from the circular horse-shoes of Brown and Blair in the corner. Philip = the cup-drinker, and hence Thomas Traherne = the dubious pulley. He went to Brasenose College and was appointed to the benefice of Credenhill where he met Susanna Hopton, according to Fumiani it would be a sort of horse later modelled in the man with or without the two nibble rear on the one side and the man with the gebisso on the other. Hopton was born Harvey, hence Susanne Harvey = the USA-Norway = Klipra connection. The 'USA-nob-ton' could perhaps be recognized in Skau Jakobsen's 'Bonton' firm (and in an Aukrust/Gröver connection?). The USA-bottom = the 'nazi cunt'. Is that why it is called USA - since it in some respects is an imitation of England specially and imitation generally as an 'abe-user' and that is where they get their innocence and good conscience from? Marilyn Monroe seems possibly to have been that missing link between such a 'nazi cunt' role and the 'abe-bos[om]-er'.

A part of the poems was kept by Thomas Traherne, the other part by Philip Traherne. The part by Philip starts with the poems "An infant-ey", "The return" and "News", which seem to model the diagonal from the homunculus over the door (by the Himmler figure) to the same posture of the Swift/Goebbels man seated with the bulletin in his hand - a diagonal which is a sort of near parallel to the one from the 'pulley' circles to the 'horse-shoe' Hitler circles.

Hence Traherne seems possibly to be a secret-service 'freemason' sort of piece of fraud which could serve to incorporate the 90 degrees angle of professor Winckler who found the british Hitlerite tablets in Boghazköy - here the right angle combines the two Tiepolos of Apostoli and Zattere. Which means that the secret political organization called international secret service - the main organizer of terror - could have created Traherne for installing the concepts over Fumiani in San Pantalon on basis of the british cuneiform of Hitlerite which opened the series of MLR in October 1905 when professor Winckler some months or weeks later made his sensational discovery in Boghazköy. That was only some months after the publication of the sensational findings of Traherne's poems from the bookeshoppe. The main purpose is probably to extend the powers of the international freemason secret service on basis of the methods of dr.Verboten. That is dr.Winckler in the film 'The third man'. From the viewpoint of these british interests, the methods of 'verboten' in extension from Traherne is perhaps what can be conceived of as a rescue for their church, but that is only because these pieces of knowledge are kept secret and therefore their dubious character of shadows of the real matter is still to be published and certainly it is not a rescue for the targets of such british terrorism. The name likely reads 'Thomas Traherne' = 'dubious tran-substantiation' = 'dubious tra-heme' = 'dubious tra-blood' = 'to mass troubled' or 'to troubled mass', as for lifting the 'masses' by way of the pulley, or as in the early days of the anglican church when everybody had to go to mass on Sunday for escaping heavy fines - a sort of spiritual economy. But this time it could be about other sorts of troubles and the 'lifting' is not only in terms of 'beer' but possibly even the flesh that holds the cup. Not Eva Braun, that probably means.

I have not studied Traherne's poems in detail, but there are good chances that the character is fictive and written by a ghostwriter. What for? It would have been for proving that these ideas which can be found on Fumiani's painting were represented in british poetry well before the painting was finished, and hence certainly could have been presented to him before he started. But that only means that the international secret service had a problem there and tried to find a solution to it - and that problem was the fictive character and identities of Pope and Swift. That is a massive scandal. Even Beowulf seems to be from the same 'laboratory'.

Assume, therefore, that Pope and Swift and Traherne are fictive characters produced by the british government for running this nazi program for getting out of the 'existential despair', sort of, then we face the horrifying question which immediately sails up in the horizon: What about all the other name-poets in the tradition of british poetry after Pope? Are they also fictive identities? The project would have been to model a fantasy world on Iceland and Norway of the middle ages, with vikings and 'lei vei-riksen' and all that, for the project of getting a grip on the jewish-genetic diaspora. If so, then the leap to the next generation is small: Then Samuel Taylor Cole[f]ridge is the name of this 'ice-landic' diaspora-genetic project when he taylorly zips with his friend and contemporary William Wordsworth, the man of words and sagas and their symbolic meanings. It is the colefridge of Nansen! A veritable orgy of cannibalism, that could be, for getting out of the despair. Das dritte Reich in the deserts of ice and snow, the very castle of glass in the 'pre-chomskyan' project. If Pope and Swift were government-tailored for the project, so could Coleridge and Wordsworth have been as well, for making the identity between the glorious past of the hebrew people with the glorious past of the icelandic people - once the global peak of literary achievement - and now it suddenly all seems to crumble under the newspiece that it was a bunch of lies from a club of poets in London. Then there is not so much left of british poetry. But these are well-considered and arguably not bad poets? These two poets are indeed considered two of the most dröhnend canons in the tradition.

In the Penguin Classics Complete Poems edition of Coleridge, the first poem is called 'Easter Holidays' and it starts with the characteristic "Hail!" as for 'Heil Hitler'. But this poem was published as late as in 1912 - 'a newly discovered poem by Coleridge' - after it was found in a letter sent to Duke Coleridge of 12 May 1787 - the later birthday of Ragna Eidsvig in 1929, i.e. 142 years later, not 147. Coleridge was then a student at Christ's Hospital - which could mean simply a sort of 'Christ-mobber'. This phenomenon is unfortunately how british poetry looks. A Fridtjof Nansen! One sometimes gets this feeling that british philology is about the art of producing fraud, not of uncovering them.

And if this is 'Easter Holidays' (skiing across Greenland?), then one wonders what 'John Keats' is about. Easter junk? But he is a good poet! I think he is, or at least untill recently I had classified Keats as a sort of hope and a good poet in the british tongue for those centuries of british poetry, but maybe one cannot entirely exclude the possibility that even he had a governmental contract (without cigar, though) for getting the chance to write and publish poetry. It would have meant a ghost-writer for a fictive biography - but clearly they would have found a good talent. It is probably not as bad as this, and the Heil Hitler poem ascribed to Coleridge is of course likely to be fraud. "Hail! festal Easter, that dost bring" - written when he was only 14 = 'vierzehn' = '8ell4' - could be a way of getting Keats under the same mat. To get him under the same tongs of San Pantalon.

The scandal is probably so total and complete and all-embracing that today it is hard to blame England for example for the fraud of the Dead Sea Scrolls: One discovers the scandal and slams the facts in the table but it doesn't help! Why not? Because it is only the tip of a giant iceberg! It doesn't move at all by such teeny-weeny 'scandals'. The world has to get an outright confession from the british government on the whole story - and that includes all those sagas and poets and documents and all the fraud. Then there could be nothing left of the public image of England. When does that confession come?

But these are perhaps no exceptions at all. The Brownings clearly incorporate the parametre of pederasty: Robert Browning as the pederast, and Elizabeth Barret Browning as the small child. Sonnets from the Portuguese...: " a mystic Shape did move / behind me and drew me backwards by the hair..." (from Sonnet no.I). It seems to be a very conscious occupation with the 'parametre'. It is supposed to look like a woman's love poetry to a man, but one really can read it as being about how an abused child is cheated by the pederast into learning the 'mysteries of love'.

Alfred Lord Tennyson = Alfred Lord Genocide.... Arven Lord Genocide: The Schengen agreement and the sideboard inheritance means thereby simply 'genocide'.

In short, the 'bordereau paper' of Dreyfus (or the 'Orderud case' in Norway) as the chess-board square way of british logic: You make a bitmap here and study the variations there and then you have it in the three parametres of nazism. That is Matthew Arnold? Matthew Warner?

Percy Bysshe Shelley = the persian Behistun cuneiform or even Rosetta stone. He wrote after the Rosetta stone was 'found' but before Behistun was deciphered. He represents in biography and poetry the Tiepolo painting on Zattere in Venice - the virgin Mary with the thread or chain in her hands and the three saints and the Jesus child. The modern version of Shelley is the TV series 'Three witches'. He was the son of Timothy Shelley = time of this 'Helly' = '8ell4', a child of his time, which means that this 'helley' = 'stone tablet' with runic/cuneiform/hieroglyphs = british myth of genetic factor. Percy Bysshe Shelley = per CB she's helley = per CBA = backwards: Shelley married or at least mated the young Harriet Westbrook = hairy & ewes-brook = hairy & use-bruk (english/norwegian sunnmörian) in 1811. The hairy beardy face on the wall of Zattere. Bruk & kast = the war against 'poetry': It is the brown fragment of either concrete or simply a book of poetry that has fallen to the ground before the two saints. Hairy & Ewes-brook = Gimsöy, the home of Sigurd Jensen, for the sheep of Jacob. Shelley also ran off with Mary Godwin (the virgin with the thread or chain in her hands), the daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft (Behistun?) and William Godwin (Rosetta = rosary?) in 1814, the year of norwegian constitution - he ran off with her and her 'step-sister' Jane Clairmont = genetic Clairmont, hence the two 'tits' of 'Harriet Westbrook' = the two saints. Or really his own when escapading with Byron in Geneva? There is the name of 'Arne Treholt' = 'amme treholt' = the Jesus child on the painting. Shelley wrote his 'The revolt of islam' = 'Tiepolo of Iceland' = this painting on Zattere after Harriet had gone 'pregnant' = the 'incised' tablet that had fallen to the ground like a divine revelation. Shelley's student friend 'Thomas Jefferson Hogg' = 'Thomas, Jesus and Fock' = the finger in the hole, the chisel of Rawlinson and those who authored the Rosetta stone. His friend the chisel, himself the poet.

Which means that the Behistun wall and Rosetta stone well could have been produced by british artists: Behistun Flaw = 'Be histuri flaw' and the 'row-seatt stone' = 'stoneing backwards' = 'regner to sky' = described in Sachs' letter to 'Ragnar Thoursie' of 25 September 1947, which means reading the 'hieroglyphs' backwards = 'sphylgoreih' = 'sweilgory' = 'svelg-gor-i' = the laryngeal theory = 'guttural' = the two young breasts of Harriet/Percy (two nibble rear), Mary and step-sister Jane, the two saints on Tiepolo. The 'Spüle' goes backwards: 'Arne Treholt' could be simply this 'spy-le' of 'Gori', for a smear campaign with a british aftertaste against my authorship. The hieroglyphs backwards. There is a right angle from this Zattere Tiepolo to the one in 'Apostoli' via San Pantalon which encode Pope and Swift. This right angle moves in a curve which touches the entrance to Campo Santa Margherita at San Pantalon.

Clearly Shelley's biography could have been made after this painting. That means that Shelley could have been a secret agent with code name (not 'Foxtrot', though - that was allegedly the code name of Treholt and it could be taken to mean the 'foxtrap' = 'reve-saksen' of MLR April 1957) - or how should one understand it? There could of course have been a ghost-writer and one made the fictive biography after the needs. His 'Prometheus unbound' is likely to be about such 'promises' and his 'Cenci' tragedy in five acts would likely be about the incisions on the wall of Behistun with a 'chisel' = 'Hellas' - that is where the story began. 'Oedipus Tyrannus' clearly is about the dipping of the nib in the ink and the subsequent running of it, but here it is transformed into the running of a tyrannic chisel into the hard rock. One guesses that his poems encode the secrets of the british code of cuneiform. One must hope that not all cuneiform was written in London before it was dug up from the earth of Mesopotamia. Iraq and Afghanistan of recent times seem to have been about this Tiepolo on Zattere. 'F-ranken-stein' is likely to be this 'divine revelation stone' in a british format: It was Mary who had 'masturbated'. Which means that it was Shelley who wrote it? 'Det er hellig' means that the anglican cannibalism and the mystic fraud therein should not be touched... King Kong.

One consequently goes on to guess boldly that Shelley never existed but some ghostwriter must have been around, with a very clear program laid out by the government in advance. The years of writing would likely have been the years of making of the Behistun wall - and possibly other cuneiform documents - after which they were 'discovered' by Rawlinson. 'The revolt of islam' as 'Tiepolo of Iceland' means that MLR April 1929 tells of an important role for Ragna Eidsvig as 'zwischenpapier' between Pope-Swift and Shelley.

But Shelley is nothing special in this story. Lord Baron = the paradoxical binary logic of Lord Byron - and George Boole = George Gordon Byron. (Church Gordon Brown?) His masterpiece is 'Don Juan' = 'The One Two and'. That is likely to be the cuneiform sign 'LAL' = 'Heil Hitler' - one vertical wedge and another horizontal attached in right angle to the 'shoulder' of the vertical. If one comes running from Apostoli towards Zattere over Rialto, one passes San Pantalon - but one has to by-run it a little (the one two church and then a little) for standing on the exact right angle spot. The cross of vertical and horizontal means (if I remember right - I don't have the books here) 'it is holy' = 'det er hellig' = 'Shelley' and it is probably essential for understanding the painting in San Pantalon - hence the one part of the right angle. The other part goes further on to Apostoli - for the LAL = Heil Hitler sign = the one two and = Don Juan with the extremity. Why did Lord Byron go to Trinity College? For the 1-2-3? His scandalous story and early exit call for explanations. When he met Teresa Guiccioli in 1818, that could mean that there was a fissure in his anus - a 'sprengt fis-ring' = 'Stonehenge' = 'brurf Storting' = 'Storting focker'. The terror was the 'guichely' of '18-18'. With Shelley? He went to Harrow school = a row column = the colon of the row-seat - for which reason he could have shared interest with Shelley not the least in 'Geneva'. Byron's Don Juan starts with the idea of being drunk in the ceiling, like the fragment fallen on Zattere, and then goes on to dedication to Robert Southey (1774-1843), poet laurete who could represent this southern part of it on Zattere along with Walter Savage Landor (1775-1864), likewise a name about this landed piece of concret or a book of poetry. But the names also means the blade of the axe in Apostoli, hypothetically for Lucia's neck. George Crabbe (1754-1832) is another land-crab whose landing on the neck or on Zattere and whose extremely 'crabbing'-obsessed poems tell of a wellorganized and tyrannic british poetry of those days. 'Crabbins' of the film 'The third man' is likely to be about him. Crabbe's poems seem to be rewrites of this essential moment suggested by his name - the moment of detachment and relief. Samuel Rogers (1763-1855) could be the lips of Lucia and Leigh Hunt (1784-1859) likewise this Apostoli as the fantasy of the virgin Mary on the other side of the Canal Grande. Thomas Hood (1799-1845) was born in the year when the Rosetta stone was 'found' in Egypt and can be recognized on the hood in the hands of the executioner. The name of 'Ebenezer Elliott' (1781-1849) can be recognized in the 'Brasenose College' of Traherne.

A tragic story, this british poetry seems to be. It seems that the whole series of poets from those years had been constructed by 'secret service' as an outgrowth from a sort of philosophical freemasonry - and as if that is what is still going on.

John Keats (1795-1821) tells in his name of the host towards the mouth of Lucia in Apostoli. She eats junk, as if she eats a piece of flesh of dubious character. Or the 'J on kids' = the fallen piece on Zattere. The Easter junk of cannibalism should, though, be taken to be british fantasies only: There is no cannibalism in Tiepolo's painting, unless one speaks british-'metaphorically' about the male 'bread' as a piece of human flesh served in communion. But that is a misunderstanding which gives rise to the british interpretetion of pederasty as related to transubstantiation. The painting is about the role of the factor of 'oral poetry' as against the 'oral theory' on Zattere. Tiepolo in Apostoli is phonological while Tiepolo on Zattere is semantic and there is a linguistic-semiotic link between these two in the node of San Pantalon. But the 'anglican' understanding of this is a misunderstanding. I have shown in my Endmorgan Quartet book 14 that the real relation between these two 'churches' or rather the artworks therein is in the universals of linguistic distribution along with the other poetic parametres of poetic language, and the british misunderstanding is to take the phenomenon in Venice for a 'secret service' project. Mystic knowledge... Keats is arguably a wellsounding poet, whoever wrote his poetry, but it may well be that this is due to the phenomenon of Tiepolo in Apostoli as representing the oral cavity. (Funny, though, Yeats has somewhat of the same oral well-sounding character). Keats studied medicine and chemistry for an apothecary - what today often is called 'junk'.

The story boils in tragic 'british' logic down to the parametres of pederasty, cannibalism and genocide - which are likely to be the three parametres of the code on Rosetta and Behistun. 2 x 2 x 2 = the one two and of binary logic = Don Juan of Lord Byron. And later George Boole, if even he ever existed. But these are strange 'overseas' misunderstandings of universal aspects of language, not of culture. Nature and culture seem to swap across that canal.

If the story is as bad as this, then one must assume that the british parnassus has been engineered by the government, filling in the one parametre after the other, and searching among the schoolchildren for poetic talents who could be given a pseudonym and fictive biography and a job to fill as poets. It is a little hard to believe, though, not the least since the poetry isn't bad (it is well versed), but it is probably not impossible. But that means that the poetry could have been written years ahead of the official dates of their writing, and the young and stormy 'poetic' life was a little organized in advance, if it ever existed.

It is depressing indeed. One looks up George Crabbe's collected works, just in the hope of finding something else than what the name suggests, but one searches in vain for a poem in the 3-volume collection which is not essentially about just that. In existential despair, one pulls out John Clare from the bookshelf - just to have the crazy idea clared away in a hurry - and there is nothing but a chomsky'an castle of glass in the high air, even unilateral! A real knotch the other way! The stalinist parnassus would have been nothing compared to this. Thomas Hardy's poetry is of the sort which he could have liked to give to nice ladies. Could be the britons are like that. How to get a name in poetry.

All this would probably have been standard jokes about british poetry which nobody could have taken seriously - untill Pope and Swift are found up there under the ceiling in San Pantalon and one discovers that the Dead Sea Scrolls could mean that even the icelandic old norse is of the same type. That is the force of Thomas Traherne - that the whole 'anglican' tradition trembles.

But it cannot be as crazy as this. One must believe that britons are a little special in this sense of it, that they tend to write the poetry which the name suggests, and that there is space for only a few of them up there in the parnassus. But then the british society is somewhat of a horrible terror machine with a one-track mind fixed on one and only one thing and that is genocide - for finding a solution to the despair. It would mean that the poetic solution has not really been found. Or, rather, that if there should be the chance of any poetic solution to the anglican problem at all, it would have to start from the 'scratch' of these parametres. And that is why these names have written these authorships. But a massive pressure it must be if this is the explanation. I really cannot look totally apart from the possibility that Elisabeth Barret Browning's sonnets are not intentionally designed to look like just that 'mistake'. Rather, it looks as if they are written with this very speficially in mind. Did she ever exist?

If there are any authentic hieroglyphs or cuneiform tablets available today, one really should start the decipherment totally from scratch. Not from the scratch of Rawlinson or his precursors but from the beginning. Could be Rawlinson was only a decent decipherer of what the british explorers had done before him.

Hence the whole story is the anti-Pope, the 'british' revolt against catholic christianity, for which reason they tried to take it at the root which means at the jewish diaspora. A grandiose attempt to resemble reality by replacing it with something else. When my poetry in TEQ shows that the phenomenon of the right angle in Venice is a linguistic universal, that is when it is jewish-genetic poetry, and that is when the anglican construction, which seems to be the basis for the entire tradition of british poetry perhaps even since Shakespeare, loses its meaning. Could be that is the reason why they felt the need for attacking the Jews.

If Reinhard Heydrich changed his name after the war or his dis-ap-pear-ance, it would likely have been to something resembling 'Hage' = 'Garden' (which does not mean that Hage = Heydrich, but the name could have been the same), it could have been for 'William's Hage's-pear': The male Eve's hage's pear - the male Eve's garden pear. An anglican variant of the catholic translation of the story. One really feels like coming into quicksand when one starts studying these name- and biography-phenomena of british poetry, and one does right in speculating whether all biographies are the purest swindle for governmental propaganda purposes. Now even Shakespeare? A dangerous and fanatic sect which apparently cannot find other ways to solve the problems. Moving the colon from the behind over to the vagina: Is that the 'british' interpretation of 'William Shakespeare' = 'the male Eve's garden pear' = the secret of Hitler's swastika - this 'hake-s-pear'? Eva Braun-pear? The Lockerbie air-drama of 'Lamen Kalifa Fhima' and 'a gentle brush of laughter' (sounds like a pop song - wasn't there one called 'a whider shade of pale' or something like that?) could mean an air-drama of an abnormal kind. 'Abdel Basset Ali Megrahi' = the ape-part dog other-with-pregnant = [h]agdel beagle surrogate mother = swastika surrogate mother = the birth of an ad-old feetler = the cigar in the back-front feetler = the 'son of man' = the anti-Pope. The solution for the anglican church?

This would make for a connection from Gröver masturbating in the window in Molde 1962 to the Kennedy assassination in 1963 up to an ad-old feetler on Simmering = the Abr-Eham gasse. The cigar in the colon-turned-vagina would be the name of 'Reinhard Heydrich' = 'William Shakespeare' as the father of Ad-Old Feetler = Abr-Eham Gasse.

The story starts with the anglican church in the mid 16th century and seems to include the bulk of major poetry from Shakespeare to the present day. A most peculiar overseas sect... One would believe that the tradition has partly converged by itself, partly has it been helped in a certain direction, untill it focussed on the 'anglican' reading of the cuneiform of Rawlinson and Hitlerite. The interesting question is not whether this phenomenon should be offered attention at all - it certainly does call for an explanation - but the question is whether the biographies of the poets have been designed by administration or have taken shape naturally within the british culture-space. As long as british philology continues to take this british tradition of poetry seriously there is the danger of new genocides.

My TEQ shows that this anglican winckel-freemasonry is not the only possible solution. There are poetic solutions which are linguistic-semiotic and not cannibalist. This means that the solution I have found is likely to be along the lines of or in the extension of the jewish-hebrew basis - which the 'anglican' solution tried to take at the root.

An 'ad-old feetler' mysticism of the british kind tries apparently to turn the linguistic-semiotic into the cannibalist by way of 'euch-A-rist' = 'you Christ' (cp. Reinhard Heydrich') on basis of the greek aspectual category of 'A-or-rist-us', which here means either the 'A' or the 'shaking of us' (the shakers, the quakers, the shakers of the pears). But this 'rist' is the grid of the Dreyfus-'bordereau' paper of british logic. 'Fe-risten' (not 'tre-risten' of 'Treholt') is the grid of iron metal bars on a road - the 'fe-holt' - over which the fleshy cattle will not pass, at least not without wellingtons, and this adds the 'ferries' to the 'wellingtons' of high-water Venice = 'fe-stivale'. It is these wellingtons that are added to the feet for the 'ad-old feetler', a variant of 'Dongr Over'. ('Dongr Under', sort of - Arne Treholt went to Russia after his release and, according to a newspaper, was selling condoms in the street - a 'hawker' as in the exclamation of Ragna Gröver). Leiv Eirikson may have gone for just a short trip in his T-fur down to the kaupang on Sunnmöre with half a she-pig and a sack of very fine handpicked sheep-dung for changing it into some barrels of mead when he came adrift and was led by sudden unexpected winds to a new continent - as if he had eaten human flesh on the way and could not understand the 'nightingales' in the right way. Some may feel that they have seen the bottom of the mystery when they recognize these wellingtons as the same as the 'Stonehenge', for example for explaining why old norse saga world seems to have heralded Adolf Hitler centuries in advance, much more in advance than e.g. MLR tends to be, but that must count as a sort of 'british' logic which assigns mystic qualities to the name. That is why Alfred Lord Tennyson wrote the poetry as he did - he was not contacted by the governmental ministry for an Alven Lord Genocide job but History and Mystery contacted him for the job because of his name. That is because of 'you Christ' in a cannibalist sense of it. 'Kniba' is the tongs of San Pantalon.

Eucharistos = thankyou. William Makepeace Thackeray (1811-1863) was indeed born in Calcutta, cp. that half she pig of Eiriksson whose parents could have been merchants from Sunnmöre. He broke off his studies at Oxford and went for a trip to Paris for studying handpicked 'arts' and smoking his peacepipe. His wife went half crazy and he published 'Comic tales and sketches', 'Notes of a journey from Cornhill to Grand Cairo' etc. Why? It is the history-mystery of the name. The details do not matter - the britons think it funny to write the funny biographies anyhow. His contemporary and 'competitor' was Charles Dickens, whose career could have been fuelled by just those viking Vinland stories about the man who was on his way down to the kaupang for some buckets of beer when he was led astray by unexpected gales. Then the question is whether it is called Reykjavik because of that peacepipe (in which case Thackeray could have served the interests of the US democrat party on behalf of the british labour) or if it be a matter of scholastic philosophy (= 'Charles Dickens'). A 'jarle bruvig' is it not, and a disken-springer it should not be either, unless one concludes that Adolf Hitler was made by the britons for ridiculing scholastic philosophy. Which indeed may be the story, since scholasticism is at the heart of the religious implementation of naive cannibalism - but provides a sensible philosophical explanation to the phenomena which does not include weird misinterpretations of the communion. Scholasticism does, though, provide for a 'motivated' understanding of linguistic phenomena such as names, and that could be the reason why britons could have liked to abuse scholasticism for giving a false pretext to the name-role relation of british poetry. The philosophy of language of the socalled 'modistae' was based on the inherent properties of the real-world referents of linguistic signification, from which they derived more abstract word classes. The modistae represented a development from the former referent-based syntax and the later nominalist grammars. The key concept was the various forms of modus of being, which gave rise to syntactic structure. This syntactic structure thereby arose from an emanation of referential essence, and these modi essendi were essentially language-independent. That is how language came to be motivated by nature in modistic theory.

Modistic scholastics is thereby a sort of historic precondition for a naive cannibalist religion, while the internationalization of it into nominalist grammar - just before the anglican break with Rome - comes to correspond to the role of Chomsky for a 'verboten' program of nazi politics which includes an elaboration of the naive cannibalism. This seems to be the background for chomskyan theory as a theoretic foundation of new nazism - and one can speculatae that the role of these theories were somewhat prepared for since his birth. But it is normally difficult to take Chomsky on these terms - since progress in linguistic theory, at least at the time of the second half of the 20th century, necessarily had to entail a certain element of 'internalization'. Which, of course, also makes these theoretical foundations of new nazism difficult to battle. It was the same sort of internationalization in terms of renaissance nominalism which could have been the basis for anglicanism and protestantism generally.

Hence, while Coleridge and Wordsworth make for a 'modistic' basis for nazi philosophy in England, Thackeray ('[jeg] takkerei' = '[I] thankyou') and Dickens make for an extension of it astray into US democrat politics, as a remote extension of british holocaust philosophy. It is the funny behaviour of the names in these stories which tell of a 'motivated signification' as the basis for implementation of 'anglican' cannibalism - and hence the genocidal factor as the outcome of it. The new nazism is not necessarily out for primitive genocide but rather more advance spiritual genocide: The complete extermination of spiritual and intellectual 'organization' in terms of ins and outs of ideas which interface with the historic consciousness. The old realist-nominalist dichotomy continues as before - now it is about what an 'idea' is: Texts as strings of black-and-white symbols are copyrighted in new 'nominalist' nazi conceptualization, but the ideas therein are not.

'Anglican' culture seems to have created poets by the motivation in their names - and possibly even constructed a good portion of them artificially for refining the system. That corresponds to the modus intelligendi passivus vs. activus of modistic philosophy, but transposed onto the administrative level of society. It could be this which carries the fictional world of administration to an extent which lends to it the feeling of reality: If administration represents the modus intelligendi activus when it creates a fictive poet biography or a Dead Sea scroll for 'adjusting' history, then it lifts the medieval mode of signification from the subjective to the administrative level - and this could be precisely the trick of nazism. It corresponds to the development of a weird form of 'new historicity' in social cognition. It is the phenomenon of emanation of referential essence in modistic grammar which transposes this onto the interpretation of cannibalism via genocide in nazi philosophy on the role of administration. That is the reason for the strange function of names: It lends to administration a feeling of 'motivatedness' by cosmic harmony with nature, however bizarre that may appear, and however much the cosmic harmony presupposes a little mass murder before one can relax and go to sleep. This philosophy seems inclined to search for universal satisfaction by erasure of 'thoughts' (that is, human individuals under the administrative system, cp. also the idea of 'the abdominal brain') which are at odds with the categorization at stake. That is 'verboten'. Freethinking verboten.

This is called 'mixing levels' (cp. 'Monica Lewinsky'?). The root of the problem is in the human communion with the divine. Catholicism allows for an institutional consecration of the biscuit by way of the dogma of the historic revelation of the church - to an extent which can allow for the individual human to intercourse with the divine in the communion in church. It is when this symbolic mystery of conversion in the mouth is extended to the social realm that the problems arise: Then there is no reason for 'cannibalism' any longer. Pure violence, that means.

The solution? That is in revelational poetry which can allow for divine revelation within the framework of poetic revelation. Then it is oral theory and oral poetry (as in the two Tiepolos): The poetry transubstantiates to theory in the mouth or rather vice versa - it is the Talmud which provides for the social circumstances needed for the transformation, the oral theory, but it is the Torah which is the transformed poetry in the mouth. This is the jewish solution which was attacked by nazism. My 'The Dreamer' is the theory and 'The Endmorgan Quartet' is the poetry. The administrative panic with the global terrorism on these two works of mine tells of the nature of british administration and its traditions. The theory in The Dreamer is oral since it is talmudic and literary, and the poetry in The Endmorgan Quartet is oral since it is not on the paper but in the interplay of the 16 poetic functions - which makes the poetry float on a sort of magnetic pillow without falling down on the flat paper. Hence both theory and poetry are 'oral' or simply revelational. In stoic philosophy, there is the concept of lekton which allows for a coexistence of mutually divergent truth values in one and the same poetic reality, and this is what those parts of Christianity which later developed into protestantism and anglicanism came to interpret as the 'dirty beast in the revelation'. It existed in stoicism up to about the time when jewish oral theory came to be written down in the Talmud - and Augustine defined his schizophreniform concept of time. This cultural hebephrenia is likely to be the origin of the mixing of levels as mixing of subjective and social cognition. In fact the problem can be traced to Dante's theory of language as oral poetic language (as subjective) vs. theory of language (as written and 'administrative'). By this, he differs from the contemporary modistae and their tripartite conceptualization of language as 'mental structure', 'theory', both of which are of universal kind, and 'grammar of a particular language'. See Lo Piparo (1986) for a discussion. What is interesting about Dante is that he obviously re-considers the modistic matters for reasons of poetic revelation - and he does so by a dichotomy in theory (grammar) = written language vs. poetry = oral language - plus that hallmark of Dantean structure which can be identified as the permutational matrix. That corresponds to the modistic 'mental structure', or simply the basis for a cognitive grammar on a neural basis. This 'neural basis' is also the essential question about Chomskyan grammar. If 'grammar' for the medieval mind was synonymous with 'latin', 'vulgar' meant 'italian' - and Dante seems to come close to an idea of italian (vulgar) as representing nature as against latin (grammar) representing culture. The modistae would not have made such differences since they considered linguistic variation a surface phenomenon on top of the essential universals of language. Dante's use of italian was therefore a sort of 'oral poetry' which necessarily intersected with 'oral theory' to the extent that it was written - which it was, not the least in terms of his permutational matrix as the underlying poetic form. But the modistic-scholastic ideas of 'nature' as emanating from the referential objects is by Dante moved onto the level of oral language, which is what removes the 'cannibalist' factor from the theory and shifts it into poetic form. The tragic nazi misinterpretation of this is when administrative adjustments of reality, such as british traditions seem to be brimming over with, corresponds to the cognitive permutational matrix of Dante's poetic form. That is, for example, when the bomb in Buinaksk in Dagestan on 4 September 1999 was #2 in the series but must be interpreted as #5 in the administrative conception of language in MLR July 1999. The function of this administrative terror is the phenomenon of strange names in british poetry - when the poet seems to write his own name over and over again, volume after volume. However, this could also be an expression of 'existential despair' of the poet and his only framework of poetic freedom within a totalitarian and tyrannic cannibalist system which replies with doing the same and adjusting it to its own needs.

On this background, Charles Dickens seems to encode simply the scholastic philosophy, while the US democrat link to british origins via Thackeray would correspond to a sort of dantean solution. Dickens' 'Oliver Twist' seems to represent the olive twig or leaf which the dove of Noah (after it had been let out from 'the ring of his finger' in search for something substantial in the humid landscape) brought back to the ark, as a symbol of Dante's permutational matrix of terza rima and the sonnet: It is in that sonnet algorithm that lines 15 and 16 are suppressed or 'secret' and hence MI5 and MI6 in England. Hence Dickens was likely to have been a secret service project, sort of. His titles tell of the same occupation with the story of Noah and scholasticism, and one can think of Dickens as a way of exporting or 'springing' the british program to USA via Thackeray as 'the new land' after the flooding was over. His 'Great expectations' = emanated from modus essendi of the modistae, and 'Dombey and Son' = 'colombo and son'. This occupation with the dove of Noah could also be recognized in Dickens' 'Our Mutual Friend' in the form of the norwegian children's books author Per Kvist ('peer twig') as a pseudonym for 'Wexel Wexelsen' who seems to have been a concept for indexing the Red Brigades in Italy: Kvist wrote the book 'Den røde hånds liga' = 'the red hand's liga' = 'de røde gribader' = 'Gribate Rosse', for 'Brigate Rosse', which thereby can be thought of as postwar british secret service for exporting the british program also to Italy. The 'olive leaf' of Genesis 8:11 is called 'aleh-zayit' in hebrew - or perhaps simply 'Allah is great'. In hebrew, read from left to right, the word looks a little like greek-inspired 'pil[i]plu' or simply his 'Barnaby Rudge' (1841). Cp. also the 'Natascha case' in Vienna with 'Prikopil' as a sort of US democrat 'olive twig' - and even 'P.Lindell' who wrote Sachs' death certificate of 'ca.coli' (not 'cigar.coli'). Could be that is Dickens' art in scholarly 'chuzzlewit'. In short, it seems to have been mainly this single hebrew word and perhaps not so much more which was the underlying theme of Dickens' authorship, for which reason 'Per Kvist' would be about his peer 'Thackeray' - which means the bridge to USA.

Now all this means that since Dickens and Thackeray seem to be two inseparable parts of the same solution, the real trick which today is sold in USA as the US democrat party is in the word-game on the 'eucharistos' (including the 'fe-rist') which seems to have been engineered for providing a 'natural' reason for the strange name-role relations in british poetry. Why is the name and biography and poetry of Shelley such a strange correlate to these empirical things in Venice and the 'secret-service' implementation of them? Is it because he was a secret agent writing on behalf of the british government or is it because he was inspired by loftier poetic reasons? The trick with Thackeray and Dickens seems to be the idea that it is the mystery of the 'eucharistos' and the 'submorphemic signification' therein which explains the mystic correlations. This is not my version of the phenomenon of 'submorphemic signification'! Rather my view is that etymological form is poetic logic but certainly not in that 'snu-bla' or 'eucharistos-kniba' sense of it. But this difference in views on the status of submorphemic signification could be the reason for the apparently violent response from the US democrat party with Clinton to my book in 1995 - for example in the sinking of the russian submarine Kursk in 2000.

Shelley was not a secret agent, one could conjecture, but the international secret service - although they would probably never dream of making any such claims publically, since that takes the force out of the logic - can certainly make a secret proof which tells that he was. Look here: There is hardly a detail in 'The revolt of islam' which is not about Tiepolo's painting of the virgin on Zattere: That is because the administration wanted the right angle from Zattere via San Pantalon to Apostoli and ordered a poem from Shelley (whose real name could have been something else but they made this name for him while they were preparing the discovery of Behistun in Persia). And so he wrote a long poem for that purpose. This is the administrative logic which explains the mystery. But there is another and bigger mystery which is much more interesting, says I, and that is the idea that just as Tiepolo in Apostoli is about the universals of oral poetry, so the Tiepolo on Zattere is about universals in oral theory or 'revelational' semantics. See the study of the etymological form.

Now assume that Zattere is Shelley's 'Revolt of islam' and Apostoli is Keats' 'Endymion', for example. Then one puts in a Don Juan of Lord Byron in San Pantalon and one has the 'rainbow' over there - but in the british literary landscape this is not a rainbow spanning a work of poetry - it is rather a freemason 'L' spanning the cultural space instead! Clearly one could make a sort of 'bow' by moving the right angle between Apostoli and Zattere over the map, but that is not the same. It means that Shelley = pederasty, Keats = cannibalism and Byron = genocide. What a tragic interpretation of the universal poetic rainbow which should exist in the interface between the subjective individual mind and the collective consciousness but in the british reality is divided up into roles for individuals - as if the british culture-space represented one single mind. I read some half way through Shelley's 'Revolt of islam' and struggled thereafter with detaching me from the grip of the form - untill a certain uneasiness made me burst into an unpleasant mockery-laughter by the thought of the concept of 'papa'. Why? It could be that a cultural association of this symbol of ascension with the deplorable concept of pederasty is so unfortunate that it ridicules the very concept of the genetic father. That could even have been the purpose with the attempt on the pope in 1981. The angle is not entirely right at San Pantalon - it is rather a little more than 90 degrees and that can be called 'stumpen' - with reference to either the front or the back (of a child). If Celan represented Apostoli and Sachs the virgin Mary on Zattere (in which case one could turn the gender by way of pederasty and cannibalism), the name John Paul could be about just this axis from San Pantalon to Apostoli (cp. also 'Jean Paul Sartre' - and his mate 'Simone de Beauvoir', as if that genetic bow were the alternative to his 'L' - I suppose these two were not british secret service agents but rather found each other in a universal semiotic truth - although I recall Aarseth, I think it was, in 1982 talking of Sartre as philosopher #1 and Beauvoir as #2 at the philosophical institute in Paris, and Vibeke Gröver quoted a classmate 'Erling' - not 'Pär Lindell' - whose dream was to read Sartre in his mother tongue french). Similarly, the Tiepolo in Apostoli as being about the spiritual communion interpreted as an act of cannibalism is a potential ridiculing or mocking of the genetic mother - such as for the idea that mammals are cannibals because they eat the milk from the mother's breasts. But this means that the combination of a british interpretation of Tiepolo on Zattere and Apostoli could contain an element of mockery against the genetic parents - leaving the unifying node of San Pantalon as a semiotic mystery for disrupting the genetic link of the jewish-genetic diaspora and the culture-space inherent in that link. That would be the reason for Hitler's government modelled from the paintings in this church. And that would mean that the third classic nazi factor - the genocide - serves precisely to mock the concept of genetic relatedness in general. But that is precisely when transubstantian in terms of genocide in the global space instead of on the tongue of the believer is a catastrophe. The individual metabolism is transformed into a 'metabolism' in terms of genocide - even as an attack on the genetic bonds between humans. And that world of nazism is when the society turns monarchic in an unhealthy sense of it: The whole world is one single mind and one single body and there is a crown on top of it and the aspirations of the british government is then to have the whole world react in accordance with the thoughts and wishes under the british crown. Hence the world wars for installing this global theatre and the mythological machinery needed for setting it agoing.

The root of this tragic story is likely to be found in just a misinterpretation of scholastic philosophy with its motivated signification which britons have interpreted as a case of motivated naming of things as equivalent with motivated naming of persons, and that is why Shelley wrote Zattere and Keats Apostoli and Byron San Pantalon. And bad it is that these pantheonic figures have been assigned the roles of taboos.

The question remains whether e.g. Shelley could have been a poet engineered for political purposes or whether he was an independent eruptive talent. There is no doubt that the poems are written by a wellskilled talent, so to speak, but certainly they had such in England as well and one of those could in principle have written it under a pseudonym for adminstrative purposes. If there is an element of mockery in e.g. 'The revolt of islam', that could have been the result of the phenomenon that the work imitates a painting (if that is the story) without being authentically a work about ascension in the sense of revelational semantics - in which case it could have led to an inherent mockery of the genetic father as a 'pederast'. (Is all Shelley's poetry based on this single painting by Tiepolo? See e.g. his "The masque of anarchy" from 1819, and many others). It does not make it a poetic work about ascension even if it imitates elements in a painting which represents ascension: That would rather have the opposite effect. Then it would not be about an ascension to heaven - but maybe a departure to some other place. Put differently: If british administration decided that Tiepolo was perhaps the biggest painter ever and therefore they planned to install his works into their administration without crediting the source, that could have been the reason for the tragic holocaust and all that. If this is the story, then I think they should come out with it before it has all gone to that other place.

There are reasons to believe that there could exist such an axis from San Pantalon to Apostoli representing the main vertical stroke of a normal alphabetic letter. For example, taking it on to Zattere makes it an 'L'. There would be a corresponding point of the upper righthand angle of symbols such as the 'K' in the basilica di San Marco - and the tower there which fell at 09:52 on 14 July 1902 seems to have been the model for the falldown of one of the twin towers on Manhattan at about the same time point on 11 September 2001 (it was probably intended to fall at 09:52 but they missed with some minutes). 'L-and-K' are 'held' together in such a structure in the concept of 'alcohol' if that symbolizes secret service mysticism. The particular role for the church of San Trovaso (with Giambono etc) relative to Zattere creates a correlate in the church of Santa Maria Formosa about which Rilke writes in one of his elegies of a strange uplifting effect. I did go there and looked for it - and, indeed, there is a point inside that church which has a strange sort of magic lift in it - a mystic force of ascension which is very strong and notable. I recall the feeling from the childhood game of somebody holding your arms close to your body while you with all force try to lift them out and up - and after a minute or two with such struggling a sudden release of the arms will make them fly up by themselves as if they were angel wings. It is the same sort of feeling in that church - but for the whole body and not only the arms. It is not about a sudden release of the 'anus' - but that of course could have been the meaning of the falldown of the second tower on Manhattan in 2001. See the systematic and original meaning of 'anathema' which was the key word for the early disputes on the transubstantiation - the anglican stance was something like that in the council of Trient, if I got the point right from the book I about 'Catholics in England 1559-1829 - a social history" by M.D.R.Leys (1961). This point in Santa Maria Formosa - Rilke's mention of it in Duine Elegy #1 means that it is not only my personal interpretation of Sachs' 'Fahrt ins Staublose' with the 'MDLVI' chapel on the other side, but clearly this reference could be contained in Manhattan 2001 - could be the reason why San Trovaso has been assigned a special role in the mysticism. The falldown instead of ascension of the second tower on Manhattan in 2001 could have been an attempt to turn the movement for San Trovaso - if it were about down it would be turn up and vice versa. Or, rather, there is a smaller Chiesa di San Giovanni Novo (a sort of 'John Bjarne Grover'?) - corresponding to San Trovaso - and then the correlate to Santa Maria Formosa will be Ognisanti - the church for the hospital Giustinian - could be a correlate to WHO. Hence a butterfly of Formosa/Trovaso by MDLVI such as in 'Madeleine Allbright' is the alternative to Formosa/Ognisanti such as in 'Condoleezza Rice'. Chiesa di San Giovanni Novo (not Nono!) resembles San Pantalon but is smaller and seems to contain no artworks. Also, it seems that San Giovanni Novo is closed permanently. Is that why my books are not published? Is the church assigned the role of a 'cigar' - a la 'Shelley'? San Pantalon's facade looks the same - only it is bigger - but has a number of holes which were modelled in the drilling of holes in the facade (for insulation purposes - there were holes all over the outer walls of the wooden house and the holes were corked and the corks overpainted) of Kongensgate 8 in Fredrikstad in 1970 when the school dentist was drilling holes in my teeth. 'Drilled holes' = 'borra hull' = 'bo Raoul' = 'Raoul Wallenberg'. If the school dentist injected a mashed or 'moursie' foetus into my jaw for the 'cannibalist' parametre, that would make the three parametres present in San Pantalon. (Also, the idea seems to be around in the complex with the israeli incursion into Lebanon around the hour of the death of Sachs that there could have been sexual mutilation even against her dead body - or even only a 'Lug was dine'? - in which case it could have been about 'ronker moursie' which would mean 'masturbates his [own] mother', something which would have meant that it was I who did it - for example verified in the night-time peacock I saw through the window and which seems to have been represented in MLR April 1963 - cp. also the possibility that Ragnar Thoursie was with Sachs for visiting me in Molde in 1963). 'Giovanni Novo' could be a sort of octogonal or around-moving 'Casanova' - while it was the wooden structure with the holes in the walls which was 'nova' in 1970. Hence a swap-function of mine with Gröver/'Mengele' - and indeed John Jensen's sister 'Anna Jensen' could by name be representing the concept of 'Anna Thema', in which case 'Kore Filling' could be the filling in the holes of Pantalon/Kongensgate. (Cp. also the name of 'Lamen Kalifa Fhima' relative to the name of 'Jens Erik Fenstad' - and 'Abdel Basset Ali Megrahi' relative to 'Jens Erland Braarvig', the second member of the committee rejecting my doctorate thesis. The third member was 'Anders Holmberg' - who perhaps could have been the background of the ellipsis from my diary novel starting on 12 August 1994). The structure among the churches could be telling of a symbolism installed in the city for representing such 'nazi' alphabetic letters along this axis - and this could have been the basis for Rawlinson's decipherment of cuneiform. The 'counterhooks' - not 'sans S[h]erif', nor 'Pervez Musharraf' - of Formosa/Trovaso could also be a hidden meaning in the mysticisms around the concept of 'cigars' in the 'city', such as 'Che Guevara' etc. 'Eva Braun' could have been Hitler's postwar cigar - his postwar 'postcard', so to speak. There is a scene with a lift even in e.g. the Monroe film "Niagara Falls" from 1953 at 'responsibility claim' time point 42.666% through the film. After I sent my book "I tell you, Estunates" to China in the spring 2008 there was a tragic earthquake 12 May 2008 which claimed some 70-80 thousands of lives or even more. The time for the 7.8 quake was first given as 06:27:59 and then updated to 06:28:00. Looking up the time 06:28 in the last movement (the one which starts with the poem called 'Boghazköy') gives the second of these two lines which were written on 14 and 15 July 2007: "threng of thing / and Uranium pace-lift". The Form-osa issue. The colon-cigar is a 'Shelley' construction in a Godwin/'dog-wind' = venetian canal-grande structure. There was also a terrible cyclone that attacked Burma around the same time. I recall from the sixties - well before my school dentistry - the two norwegian comedians Rolv Wesenlund ('the role of the essence of Grover') and Harald Heide Steen ('has all the hello-ye/meadow/plain/moor stone') with their 'dentist' scene on TV and the dentist asking the assistant for '20 amalgam and 40 marsipan' (rather than 'moursie'-pan). Another of their TV jokes which I recall was about 'doble frustrasje-opphengs-forkoblinger', which in theory could be among these four churches of Venice. Wesenlund was later popular with a TV series about 'lagerchief Fleksnes' - which could have been about the 'Formosa' - and his old mother played by Aud Schönemann, if I remember right - cp. 'Oklahoma-man/mam'. The 'british' solution seems to be to approximate reality so much that people can start taking faith in it.

The britons know it well, all this means. And they should not continue with the violence and the 'drilling of the holes'. They gave themselves some liberties in the years when there was competition in Europe on control with new territories but the british reason may have been another than for the other powers of Europe. It may be that british imperialism was not much more than a way of making others carry out the genocides for them, such as in Rwanda. The british pop group Rolling Stones, who well may be 'secret service', made the song 'I can't get no satisfaction' which could be telling of how it feels if the britons have to stop these man-eating traditions or e.g. close down Modern Language Review. So they know it well and should not continue the madness.

So how should one relate to the traditions of british poetry? Is it cannibalist 'caca' all of it? Now even by 'electronic telepathy'? The story tells that what counts as the british parnassus seems to have been constructed for the very specific purpose of representing a war against that solution which I have arrived at in my TEQ - such as the jewish-genetic sort of poetic solution to these strange 'right-angle' phenomena which seem to be at the heart of the mysteries. This means that the most important thing in british poetry is to dismantle the whole machinery of secret mysteries and describe the factual relations between names and biographies and state-church religious-political programs installed into the poetry. Only when all that is peeled off can one start considering it from a poetic viewpoint. In short, one must first remove the FRAUD before one can consider the substance which there could be in the poetry. This role of FRAUD has apparently gone essential to british culture and it is an interesting question indeed if the britons can manage to get out of these problems on their own.

The conclusion to such studies of name-biographic poetry is likely to be that a good portion of them could be fraud and a good portion could be a deliberate play with the phenomenon from the poet's side. Quite simply, a poet may turn towards certain topics and interests because british culture is 'modistic' and feels that a happy life is to follow the suggestions inherent in the name one got at birth. The fact that Arne Treholt on this background in principle could have been a british agent or the story constructed on a british basis (he could even well have been a norwegian secret service agent working for the state of Norway, for example for the interests of the norwegian Labour party in the role of the 'Spüle-Gori', even a norwegian pendant to the 'byråsjef' in Sweden) tells that the legend of the secret organization who creates all the british poets from the scratch of the administrative desk is an active political myth which it is very difficult to decompose quite simply because it well could be true, as a closer study of the history of british poetry indeed seems to show. If Treholt has a function relative to my person, it is likely to be because of just that phenomenon. In Berlin in the early spring 2004 I got a flat and could move in right away: I would find the signed contract in my postbox a couple of days later and I could just return it and everything was fine. The contract did not arrive, but after about a week or less there was the message for me that there would come a new 'Spüle' to be installed in the kitchen (which had been totally empty when I looked at the flat) - it would not have been installed if I had not taken the flat. I said fine but the contract first, please. It did not arrive and I had to give up. It cost me, as usual, some money and time, and I had to move out to Rhinstrasse as an emergency solution. One immediately could believe that it was administration (from some country) who wanted to get an 'Arne Treholt' profile installed with a 'secret contract' of mine and they could in theory have appointed with the housing company and thereby made things more difficult for me. 'Gori' was my fantasy friend in Odda after Celan had been there in September 1960 (according to probable theories). It is even well possible that the function of the case against Treholt, whether he was a real agent or not, could have been to prepare for the administrative conclusion that I had to be a secret agent. Frankly, I do not really believe that Shelley was a secret agent working on behalf of the government, or at least I would like to postpone that conclusion, but I do admit that it seems possible to prove today that he was. That does not mean that he was a secret agent, though - it only means that it is possible to prove it with modern home-made administrative logic. The same obtains for Sachs and Celan: They certainly were not secret agents but I do believe that it could be the plan to prove in a future that they were. "Here is the contract with Hitler signed by Sachs: She would publish his poetry under her own name while the world was waiting for his name to become salonfähig again". The same sort of logic could apply to Shelley and be used to convince young and talented poets that this is how poetry is. Just sign here please... And then the government has the poetry under administrative control. Treholt allegedly had the codename 'Foxtrot': 'The foxtrap' = 'reve-saksen' = the walking ad of MLR April 1957 indexing me. The codename could have served to 'prove' by 'administrative logic' that I was a secret agent. 'Reke-saksen' or even 'reke-sausen' (the shrimp sauce) could refer to 'Rekustad' where I lived in 1977-78 (where there was a flooding after somebody had opened the kitchen tap = the Hahn) and 'Rekawinkel' is a place just west of Vienna close to 'Purkersdorf'. That 'Winckel' reinforces the links to MLR April 1957. It is the same Winckel as goes from Zattere to San Pantalon to Apostoli in Venice. Clearly this right angle is no proof that I am an agent but maybe the plan has been to use it for lending force to a constructed proof which can be built on basis of other data which they well could have made themselves. In MLR April 1983, which seems to tell of the making of 'third eye' on me in the summer 1982 just before the case against Treholt was started with a ransacking of his home flat on 17 May 1983 (while there was a graffiti telling 'SVIN' - cp. Wien and the Rekawinkel/Purkersdorf and even the 'Hahn' - drawn on the asphalt outside my home in the early morning the same national day), there is an article "Pero Vermúez and the politics of the cid's exile. By Dian Fox". It was my lack of money which would force me to take the flat with lifelong contract and cheap houserent in Ehamgasse in Vienna - when I sought my 'exile' there in 2005. And that is when Hahn was in the 'politics' of Austria. In 1983, it was still an impossible dream for me to get out of Norway for a longer time than some weeks or at best months, and it was as late as 1997 that it was a surprise to me that I could get a residence permit in England. At least up to the nineties, a norwegian needed 'special skills' or other good reasons such as being invited to a job for special reasons (one could not just seek employment abroad in competition with citizens in another country) for getting a residence permit outside Norway and that was generally impossible for me. And who would have married an 'Octogon' - something which otherwise could have been a possible escape route? Even only a brief attempt to get into marriagable relations would have produced comments in the passing in the street or for example graffiti intrigues outside the home and I could not have produced a goodenough explanation to the stories. It is called sexual and social mutilation. (See also the story with Gröver/'Mengele' telling of the young girl on the bicycle - could be for the conclusion that 'you could not find out of it' - but I think that dinner table scene was years ahead of the attempt on the pope in 1981). It was in fact impossible for me to get out of Norway before the turn of the millenium, while an outer exile could have rescued my social abilities. MLR April 1983 (above) tells of this complex with the Treholt case.

Shelley married the 'hairy vesper-rook', a 'pelley bysshe-shercy', a piece of hairy biscuit, and later ran off with the breasts = Luke. Godwin was the name, like Venice on the map is a 'dogwind'. He so to speak married the breasts after the host had been swallowed - which means after the transubstantiation of it. Which means that the transubstantiation was in terms of his own gender - a male at least untill he had eaten the hairy biscuit, after which he ran off with the breasts.

When Keats, Shelley and Byron constitute a unit, that corresponds probably to the idea of Luke as an intermediator between the Torah and the Talmud. One could guess that if Keats is swindle, then it is a series of uncredited borrowings from the Torah and then Byron is likely to be borrowings (byronings!) from the Talmud.

But the rainbow exists as a bow including the Winckel running where the angle remains right between Apostoli and Zattere. Which means that the three british poets around 1815-1820 constitute a basic model for these aspects of natural language - and in fact even for a solution to the british 'anglican' problem. Could be Shelley's funny biography could serve to be about just these aspects of his poetry.

This is the solution which was smuggled over to USA via Reykjavik, disguised as a literary twig of Thackeray - for an expansion of the double-bottomed program there. The dove found a little piece of substance there on the brink of the dry land and brought it back to Noah on his 'sheep-Thack' - that was what gave rise to the professorial chomskyan program later. It is that little twig of neural addressing which tells of 'a new american land' (cp. also the later theories on 'the abdominal brain').

That is why the british poets tacitly could have been labelled secret agents - otherwise the US democrat disguise would not have functioned. And the disguise functions only when the democrats emphatically denies that the british poets were agents. Then it is not possible to take them or their abuse without claiming that the british poets really were agents - and that is precisely when the democrats do it best. A real cork that is. The solution is what I have found in my Endmorgan Quartet. That is also likely to be the reason for the attacks on my authorship from the US democrat party. If it is the strategy and hope of the US republican party to use the concept of british agency poets, that may be not so smart when it is the precondition for a US democrat program - and it would be particularly unfortunate relative to my solution. Does my solution make the biscuit superfluous? I don't think it has to - but I think it may make religious wars less interesting. Although the bombings of Kursk, Moscow, Hebei etc in fact looks like an administrative war against my authorship.

The 'british' case is the case of administrative logic which applies to the social space as if it were an individual cognitive space of poetic cognition. But that means that the administrative reality resembles the poetic like a person with a cigar. That explains the war against the intellectuals.

The US democrat party seems to serve the function of lending a 'legitimate' rationale to the strange british phenomena - and thereby facilitate just this take-over of the role of poetry. This is the problem of terrorism and genocide - it includes even a war against poetry and the intellectuals generally. It has the function of producing wellfeeling for the culture on the island outside the european continent - and this wellfeeling is what gets poetry under administrative control. I am afraid there cannot be much doubt about this - as the periodical Modern Language review provides strong evidence for. It is the administration's attempt to get poetry under control. It apparently does not even matter who makes the genocide as long as there is some genociding going on. Could be that is why one has created the strange phenomenon of 'responsibility claims' in terrorism - in order to hide the poo which this conclusion on the purpose with the terrorism entails - that it is not really much more than the principle of evil itself in the need for it in the religious system. Islam has not those problems, as far as I know. The periodical Modern Language Review seems to serve such a function of 'british responsibility claim' in an attempt to lend adequate and legitimate justification to violence in general. Then they really should close down the periodical and find a better way than violence. Spanish bullfighting in modern form seems to have been invented in the early 18th century, could be as a spanish joke on british 'Oxford' traditions (cp. the later 'Oxford movement'). The poets Henry Taylor (1800-1886) and Richard Henry Horne (1803-1884) and others could be british 'responsibility claims' on the spanish traditions of bullfighting 'genocide' - simply british responsibility claims on genocide elsewhere - could be even for turning the spanish joke into a british tool for continued Iceland/Israel/Ireland confusions on the world of the saga. One guesses (although I have no knowledge of this) that the AIDSHIV epidemic could not have been put into circulation in 1978/1980 if one had not already a vaccine or drug against it - since otherwise it could have gotten out of hand and the administrators themselves could have fallen victim of it and there would not have been a real responsibility claim on each and every death, while the epidemic seems (according to a website I read some years ago, and according to the MLR October 1978) to have been put into circulation by way of a test vaccine against 'hepatitis-B', cp. 'hypothetical B' = 'oral theory and poetry'. Could be a sort of 'bullfighting'. Even if the problem with finding treatment against AIDSHIV should come to be solved within reasonable time, one would nevertheless have to conclude that it affected the security of the sex life of a generation. Would it be about 'IBAN & BIC AFFE'? A generation aside?

'Snor i stor-lusen' = 'thread in the big louse' could be about a disease such as AIDSHIV.

This means that the britons for some reason or other seem to feel doomed. I think they should start there and try and cheer up their self-esteem with other means than violence and destruction elsewhere.

Poetic logic is not the mystic transformation of a biscuit on the tongue into human flesh, but maybe one can say that there is some meaning in considering it a transformation of human semantics into the semantics of a corpus of divine knowledge - and that transformation takes place in the relation between oral poetry and oral theory. The Word and so forth. All these ideas of cannibalism is a terrible misunderstanding which really has absolutely nothing to do with the poetry or poetic logic.

This story of terrorism is really the story of a war against art and intellectualism. Thomas Traherne seems to be an attempt to create (by fraud, one guesses) the illusion that Fumiani made his painting on the order and instructions from the british government for their 'old norse' program - which again could serve the purpose of creating the illusion that even Tiepolo made his paintings on the instructions from the british government. That is when it gets too pathetic. Is this all and only a story of despair and envy and so forth by seeing great art? The Devold himself? Tiepolo's characters have a human reality and freshness which is precisely what modern bigbrother nazism is flattening out. My poetry and its form is not because of the secret service project - it is rather the other way round that my poetry has its form from the structure of poetic language, as can easily be proven, and this is also what Tiepolo had painted and then some briton who was in Venice for studying San Pantalon went the roads from Apostoli to Zattere and discovered the phenomenon near San Pantalon - a remarkable phenomenon indeed. They ascribed it to Tiepolo as a 'Devold' and did not understand that it is inherent in the poetic logic of natural language. The misunderstanding was veiled in secrecy for preventing the discovery of the real facts and this tragic story is what has given rise to nazism in Germany and the holocaust and a rather devastated world at the beginning of the third millenium. And today the world of politics seems totally lamed by the burden of secrecies and threats to prevent the discovery of the real facts behind the vain illusions. It seems to come down to the inert unwillingness to realize that genocide cannot continue to be a driving motor for a society - in particular if it wants to move forwards not only in technology. A solution with verboten Mengele methods is telling of the barbarisms in the unwillingness. There is one and only one solution to these problems and that is outspokenness on the secrets. If a vaccine against AIDSHIV has existed since it was started, it took anyhow some 30 years at least for it to be found by others, which tells of the political control with science and research - a control which claims via WHO research that AIDSHIV (not to be confused with some 'juvenilia' poems of mine) comes from makake monkeys.

It is probably important to understand that british poetry is not like other poetry. It is a question whether british poetry exists at all. Could be that is what Brodskij had in mind when he said that the biggest of all british poets was Wystan Hugh Auden. He is not a bad poet, that is right, and Brodskij seems to have thought (I recall this only from some interview in a magazine, I think it was) he was the biggest british poet ever. Auden was the leading figure of a group of central century british poets of the twenties consisting also of (Microsoft Encarta is my source here, although I must admit that I have read poetry of all of them in my quest for interesting british poetry) Stephen Spender ('pederasty'), Christopher Isherwood ('cannibalism'), Cecil Day Lewis & Louis MacNeice ('genocide'). If only Brodskij had been a little more outspoken on what exactly he had in mind (could it have been about a giant piece of rumour?), maybe he would not have died so prematurely and at such a telling time. It is likely that one will have to conclude that a good bulk of british poetry since Shakespeare can be considered propaganda poetry controlled by the 'british government'. In the early years of anglicanism, everybody had to go to church to avoid heavy fines. Then it is something very different from what one normally thinks of as poetry. In the works of e.g. Trakl, Thomas, Sachs, Yeats, Seferis, Luzi, Celan, Mandelstam, to mention but a few, there is not a trace of anything of that propanda function. The nazi politics probably aims at redefining these poets to propaganda poets with agency contracts - that would be just a variant of the same war against poetry.

In short, if there are plans, and there seem possibly to be, for a Black Sea Loop, the purpose of it could be quite simply to create exploitation and suffering elsewhere for the purpose of british wellbeing and 'existential satisfaction' in a ceremonial sense of it on the island.

As to the essential question how many of the canonical british poets since Shakespeare are authentic poets and how many are serving administrative interests, it is definitely an important question which calls for a closer scrutiny of the available data. My guess is that there could have been some intermediate interests and some pseudonyms with brushed-up biographies plus a tradition which could have developed on poets interpreting their names. The group around Auden is telling indeed of this. I think some of them reportedly participated in the spanish civil war - if by that they did not only mean bullfighting philosophy. Clearly many british poets could have arrived in a strange name-relation to reality via the particular role of the british state church. The apparent political interest in Spenser's "The Faerie Queene" could be telling of a need for finding solid ground under the feet in these matters - or would that simply have been where it started? The story of these matters in England definitely calls for a detailed description. If Shelley is a fictive character - for example all and only based on this painting by Tiepolo on Zattere - it could be a tip of a giant iceberg. Clearly such icebergs must be declared as belonging to the past.

Since Manhattan 11 September 2001 seems to be modelled on my diary novel for 11 September 1994, and since Hebei seems to be 10 September 1994, one naturally guesses that the Moscow bombings could have been modelled on the entry 9 September 1994 in the book. There is no such entry but the preceding one is 6 September 1994. That seems to be the basis. It is 9 September inverted. It starts:

6.9.94: It is now more than three weeks since the last notice was made. In the meantime, I have lost interest in observing such coincidences, mostly because I felt somewhat tired of the whole thing, and also because I have noticed that observations of featural reality seems to generate (or at least be associated with) social difficulties, a point which is elaborated on below. I may, though, mention one day, perhaps one and a half week ago, when I was walking from the National theater to the university library, a walk of a few hundred meters (perhaps as much as one kilometer) and took the tram back again afterwards. In the course of this little trip, I met three cars with registration numbers containing the sequence 666, and three carwith the sequence 777. I could, though, not figure out any notable patterning in these occurrences, and left it uninteresting.

The first line "It is now more than three weeks sine the last notice was made": The first bomb in Moscow was on 31 August and the last on 16 September. Inverted that is 19 September, in total 20 days, and since this is inverted it reads "it is now less than three weeks..." which means one day less than 21 days. That could be the meaning of the 16 of September. Then some lines down there is mention of 'perhaps one and a half week ago' - which can be recognized in the date 9 September 1999 of the other bombing. The comment on "observations of featural reality seems to generate (or at least be associated with) social difficulties, a point which is elaborated on below" could apply to Buinaksk in Dagestan, but then one should expect to find that the bent neck is looking down on a 'stand' which in actual fact is 'featural', which is not so normal. It would not be my 'stand', but maybe it could have referred to somebody else's, in which case nazi philosophy could make claims about somebody else's 'authorship' (if one writes with the penis, I don't know if that is normal). 'A few hundred meters' could be about 'a few dog-red-measurements' which perhaps more could resemble a 'boghazköy', hence 13 September. 'Hun[d]-dret' = 'she/dog crapped' = '13 September'. The remaining 666 and 777 could perhaps make for the concept of 16 September. Hence the dates can in fact be read from the first few lines. There are four pages of text to this 6 September 1994, so this is only a small part of it. It is not impossible that one can derive the Moscow bombings from these four pages, but I do not have the russian details and do not make it more specific than I have done here.

In theory, though, it is not impossible that the british government uses my book as a template for terror around the world - day after day throughout the book. It was I think in the autumn 1998 that I made a 791 page printout of the manuscript - which I then called 'The Dream' - and amateur-bound it myself and stored it in my bookshelf - and burglars could have found this draft to a book in that form and of course also on my computer hard drive, where it was stored under a separate directory. I had directories 'Book 1', 'Book 2' etc for the various manuscripts I could have published if only the US/UK administrations had not felt so much unwillingness about it, and this manuscript was under the directory 'Book 9'.

An agent is a person without own authority. The authority is sold to the 'employer'. If immature administration thinks of me as being 'without own authority' because I had been hospitalized in psychiatric hospital in 1999-2000, they could perhaps feel entitled to believe that they are in the possession of my authority. If so, this could also inspire them to believe that I could be conceived of as an agent. Is this why I hardly get any post at all? The letters go to 'immature administration'? If the program is to try and pretend that Shelley and Sachs and Celan were agents for british administration, they could perhaps be in need of a 'proof' that I am an agent for them - and such confiscation of post could perhaps have been explained that way - since it could lend to them some 'responsibility claim' on the bombings if the bombings are associated with my authorship of this book.

These considerations are what could have been a background for the israeli attack on Gaza if my computer were tapped and if they were out for representing the same values as England. But on the one hand I don't know if it is tapped, on the other there could be other reasons for such a spontaneous non-agency reaction - for example if my discovery in november 2008 led to the conclusion in the global consciousness of "oh what a pity this text has become so badly mutilated by international terrorism". The book had been badly bombed, and so Israel bombed back - possibly even without being aware of my discovery. If the terror on the text goes day by day, so to speak, it would have been about an intuitive and spontaneous interpretation from british side of the real phenomenon which was the hebrew text day by day through the work - and this phenomenon of british 'intuition' could perhaps call for an interpretation in terms of 'anathema' or comparable. A sort of 'intuitive evil'? Then the deep intuition would have been a sort of 'pure antisemitism'. But then it is important to notice that the pure antisemitism is british and not mine. It is I who wrote the book but it was not I who made the bombings.

It may be difficult, though, to prove that Arthur Honegger did not attack the children, I wrote here. However, in order to avoid Brodskij's error, I should rather tell the true story: It must have been in 1995 after I had read James Joyce ('Finnegan's Wake', not all of it, though) that I saw in an inner vision a man who looked like Ehud Olmert (I had not heard about him at that time but recognized him later) seated in a Madonna's Rue-de-Bac armchair (could be it was later that I understood that it was that chair): He lifted an arm and waved a greeting over to me. He did not lift an arm but only signalled a greeting? I think he did lift an arm - at least I thought so untill I had written this. And no sooner have I written this, I think that he was leaning a little forwards and turned in the chair and looked leftwards towards me. Well, at least there was a man in a chair - a chairman? - and he was moving. That is what remains for the written theory. The problem is that writing the story changes the oral theory - but telling a joke about Honegger costs nothing and it remains invariant. This complex seems to be the poetic object of my poem "For example, I could show" with parallel text Luke 23:55: "the sepulchre" ('to mnemeion') in my 'Hammerfest'. [Added the day after: I should not have added this last comment as long as the page is read mainly by political interesters].

The Oklahoma bombing took place while Clinton was president in the american government. 'O klö homa' = 'to scratch the bottom'.

English is well established as a 'lingua franca' but where can one publish a book like mine in english in Italy, Germany, Russia, China? It is very important that a 'koine' culture be established which does not depend on the beatlemania of the British Council and things like that.


There is the 'L' and the 'K' and the 'hold' of the 'L-K-hol' on the map of 'dipsomaniac' Venice, with the four 'serif' churches Ognisanti, San Trovaso, San Giovanni Novo and Santa Maria Formosa. It has been said (Kwame Ljungqvist) that the AIDSHIV epidemic was set in circulation by test vaccines against hepatitis-B on volunteering homosexuals in New York (November 1978) and Los Angeles and San Francisco (1980). The claims that the virus laboratory Gallo & Essex made the virus - for the idea of a political 'lift' from french-connection Paris to London - could derive from MLR October 1978. The four 'serif' churches make for four diagonals with four mid points which land on a rectangular gingersnap form (not a 'circumflex' of Rilke, although he mentions a sort of Formosa 'lift' in his elegy) under the shadow of the slanting tower of San Stefano, invoking ideas of San Marco 1902 and Manhattan 2001 - here a photo of it taken from Campo San Angelo:

The four gingersnap points correspond to the four mid point groups ('Hitler', 'Goebbels', 'Himmler', 'Göring') of San Pantalon and are the following: 1) Campo San Angelo, 2) behind Teatro La Fenice at the canal, 3) at Sottoportego di Malvasia Vecchia (= the 'malattia venerica' of AIDSHIV!) where it runs into Campiello Marinoni o de la Fenice, and at 4) Sottoportego Soranzo.


It seems that the whole gingersnap area can be summed up in the name Malvasia Vecchia which thereby represents the 'malattia venerica' of AIDSHIV. The Sottoportego di Malvasia Vecchia leads from Campo San Angelo into Campiello Marinoni o de la Fenice, which perhaps is an alternative to one of the mid points. It is very possible that the AIDSHIV epidemic is developed for the sole reason of this Sottoportego de la 'Malvasia Vecchia', for lending global force by way of a 'malattia venerica' to the intrigue of the 'lift' from Paris to London if Paris is the meeting-point of a Black Sea Loop from the east and the western branch with possible origin in Kennedy's Chappaquiddick car accident, and this could also have been the reason for the death of Nono (not 'Novo') on Norway's liberation day 8 May - his wife was called 'Nuria'. Cp. also the wife of Bollack - which sort of makes for a sort of association of Nono and Bollack. The liberation of Nuria? - that would be if it be about 'Campiello Marinono o de la Felice'. The niberation of Luria! Two-nibble lear! That seems to be the logic of administration which has been developed from the british program. How many have died from the epidemic so far - is it 100 million people, for the anglican wellness? Africa is sinking under the burden of it.

The slanting tower of San Stefano is leaning right over the gingersnap (one gets a little nervous right under there, even if one has reinforced the foundations a little, as can be seen at the foot), and 11 September 2001 included the aircrash in 'Lambertsville' which could be about 'landertsvive' = 'landr [paa] Swift' = 'lands [on] Swift' - the 'Göring' corner of the gingersnap under the ceiling of San Pantalon. That would be the 'Pentagon' which lands. It could correspond to the homunculus figure with isomorphic legs over the door - a sort of 17th century conceptualization of genetics - and maybe there could be some aspects of my school dentistry 1970-71 if a mashed foetus were injected. Thomas Traherne seems to interpret this diagonal in the beginning of the part of his poems found by his brother Philip - it starts with the poems "An infant-ey", "The return" and "News" (see above).

The regime of Burma could perhaps have its origin in the name of 'Aung San Suu Kyi', and I myself had to spend some weeks in 'Sandviken Psychiatric Hospital' = 'Lafenice Sanangelo Malvasia' around the turn of the millenium 1999-2000. Aung San was murdered in Burma on 19 July 1947, after the finding of the Dead Sea Scrolls in February, and the murder is easy to read from MLR April 1947, such as the three first (out of the eight) titles:

1. Constantine and the barbarians. A note on the old english 'Elene'. By Pamela Gradon
2. The chamberlain's men and the 'poetaster'. By Henry David Gray
3. Ben Johnson's 'Haddington Masque': the story and the fable. By D.J.Gordon
4. 'The eternal fitness of things': an aspect of eighteenth-century thought. By A.R.Humphreys
5. Ovid's contribution to the conception of love known as 'l'amour courtois'. By Jessie Crosland
6. The first theory of the 'vers libre'. By P.Mansell Jones
7. Poetry and patriotism in Leopardi. By J.H.Whitfield
8. Carlyle's translations from german. By C.T.Carr

The 'SAN'd runs constantly through an hourglass of 1), and Burma = Pamela, hence Gradon = grodan, swedish for the toad or frog. Gray and Gordon in 2 and 3 tells of this 'Burma' from 'Pamela'. Aung San was murdered on the other side of the war relative to Chamberlain in München. Hence a british responsibility claim on the murder already in April 1947 - and the 'Parnell' frog ('grodan') could be about the article by Barthes in Combat. Would 'Roland Barthes' and his first theoretic article in Combat be the contents of 'vers libre' and 'Leopardi' = 'Loei Pard' in 7 and 8, including the 'poetry' and 'patriotism'? 'J.H.Whitfield' = 'Combat/rombat' - 'rhombus'-shaped gingersnap? That could mean that even the coup in Combat against Camus could have been by british interests who planned the murder of Aung San - for the specific purpose of representing the 'rhombus' in Venice. With this 'Barthes', it calls forth associations to 'Haerlem' in the 'Memoirs of Martinus Scriblerus' - close to the mention of 'Barthius' (see above) - and hence 'Ben Johnson' = 'John Jensen' as in MLR April 1957, ten years later. Cp. 1947-1957-1967. San Aung U = San Angelo, 'Malvasia' is not 'Malaysia', but it is not so far away. 'Lafenice' = articles 4) and 5), perhaps including the 'eternal wellness' of England by 'malattia vecchia' in 4). 'Jessie Crosland' would be about this cross of Turkey-Vienna-Paris with Vilnius-Vienna-Venice and the christian link to Rome. 'Stefano' echoes the concept of 'step-father', as in 8). In short, it seems that this 'gingersnap' outline could have been the background of the murder of Aung San in 1947. In short, a british responsibility claim on the murder of Aung San which puts it in systematic connection with the article by Barthes after the coup in 'Combat' (by 'Henri Smadja', cp. the car crash of Diana in 1997) and with the gingersnap area in Venice - under the slanting tower of San Stefano. (Cp. also 'Hilary Clinton' with 'veneric maltia' for 'Venezia' = 'heleizon').

One notices the spoonerisms of 'John Sovanni Novo' and 'Tran Sovaso' with a similar butterfly of 'John Bjarne [h]Omovo' and 'Tran-Sov-As[h]o' for the 'tran-sub-stantiation' of the 'Novo'. The death of Nono looks like a political murder - it was certainly not his wife who murdered him but maybe it was the intrigue to make it look like it.

Whose 'stantiation' is the 'novo'? Is it the 'trans' of Adolf Hitler 1957? Clearly it would be no solution to these fictive threats to think of the world as a better place without my extremities. (Click here for the signs of Parochia de S.Luca and Parochia de S.Stefano as seen from the gingersnap angle on San Angelo - S.Luca is not S.Lucia and please keep political 'turnaround' ideas of penis-serving-sperm like serving verboten chemicals or a nuclear bomb off me). The name of 'Pervez Musharraf' could be taken to be about these 'serif'-crossings - for which reason 'Benazir Bhutto' could have been telling of such Lucia/Luca and possibly even Burma. According to the 'AK' office in Vienna, I have the right to have my 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' returned from ÖVW. That is about money and not turned-around sperm or chemicals. If 11 September 2001 - including Lambertsville - means this slanting tower of San Stefano which hangs threatening over the gingersnap of Venice, then it really could mean the Stephanskirche in Vienna and the political threat of a nuclear bomb over this austrian landmark in the place which was credited with the mythological origin of nazism by Hitler's origin in Austria. Which means that 11 September 2001 could mean that the tower falls which then means that Dr.Verboten spreads out from Vienna in Europe, which could mean the Black Sea Loop ending in Paris wherefrom it is lifted with AIDSHIV 'lift' over to London. The gingersnap is the 'bordereau' paper which also is found under the ceiling of San Pantalon. This way of thinking seems to be the background of the 'green' political movement in Europe - as they are installing their politics in the maps of the cities.

As far as the data on the test vaccine in November 1978 is concerned, I must add that this is approximately the temporal mid point between the narcosis on me in the summers of 1975 and 1982. But the second of these was my own initiative (I did not know that narcosis was necessary, though) and it is doubtful whether it could have been planned in advance. But the 'Gallo & Essex' seems to be present in the undertext of MLR October 1978.

Conclusion end of March 2009 to the story with the letter: The letter of 25 November 2008 contained an inquiry but there has been no answer - instead the payment was moved from 'Langkaia' to another office - first 'Harstad' and thereafter 'Etterstad'. The last and 16th book in my TEQ is in two out of four parts a parallel to Midori's recording of Bach and Bartok sonatas and the last movement starts in my book with a poem called 'Boghazköy', which can be seen to represent also 'Langkaia'. The detachment of mine from the idea of 'ronker moursie' would of course be within the range of concerns for my book, while the change to another pensions office could serve to detach me from my own artwork in this sense of it and one could perhaps spot hostile british interests therein. I had in 2008 sent a copy of my book (not by bottle mail) to Holmqvist and one could see the story as representative of my relations to 'frau gRöver' - leaving the impression that I am nothing worth, sort of. The paper comes the odd way in the bank and the library closes for more than a month due to bad smells after I had registered as loaner there. My communications with the world is a critical point and in this case my inquiry about how payment in foreign currency is calculated - so that I could evaluate myself whether this would be a good idea or not - was not answered but I was detached from 'Langkaia' and the communications lines were in fact broken - my attempts to get through in december with email and telephone failed. The emails came back some hours after I had sent them - apparently stopped in some filter somewhere. The story resembles the institutional 'hijacking' of my relations with the 'muse' in terms of the psychiatric hospital in Bergen in 1999: Instead of an answer I was locked into the institution for a few weeks and my authority ignored. One notices also a certain similarity of 'Boghazköy' with 'Kashinskoye' and 'Varshavskoye' Shosse) in the bombings of Moscow in September 1999, a few weeks before the hospitalization of me, and these bombings seem even to have been a part of a british administrative strategy against my poetic authorship after I had sent my TEQ to legal deposit in England. I should not have sent the last book there in 2008. Arne Treholt was sentenced as 'Spü'-le, and after his release from prison he sold condoms (not type 'Gori', I hope) in Moscow, according to some news, something which perhaps could associate with british and US democrat interests in 'Thackeray' which extends via 'Dickens' to hypothetical british terrorist interests in Italy, while administrative interests in Celan's manuscripts perhaps would be inclined towards conceiving them as signalling the idea of an agency relation which recommended a rejection of me 'at the first attempt' = 'på første forsøk', cp. the 'påfugl' (peacock) of 1963 apparently represented even in the article titles of Modern Language Review April 1963. The difference between these 'på første forsøk' and 'påfugl' leaves 'steforsøk' or simply 'Stephansøk' as if a laser-guided bomb were on its way towards Stephansplatz in Vienna (= 'A-moll-konserten'?). Wasn't it even there that one had photographed Treholt along with Gennadij Titov - the name suggests 'get your hands off [my] tits' which perhaps sometimes could have had some diplomatic effect. (One notices also the apparently edited document of Martin Weiss - and although I have no reason to believe that austrian post chief Anton Weiss 'edits' the documents that go through the austrian post, I did feel the effect of the media attention to some postal matters after I had been involved with the post - such as the ad campaign for 'Post24' a day or two after I had ordered a book from 'Buch24' on the internet - not 'Boghazköy', though - and there were some such cases which made me feel unwell - and I did wonder if there were arrangements generally and elsewhere for constructing an 'Abr-Eham' monster out of me). But it is perhaps ambiguous as to whose hands are referred to - even for Arne 'Treholt/Feholt', cp. the name of 'Arne Kr.Sollid' and the king's escape from Molde 1940? - and one could spot even a comment to the photo of Sachs apparently after she had been in Molde in 1963 - the photo seems to contain a possible chance for me to recognize her from the meeting in adult age, as could be the administrative interpretation. That could even be thought of as a possible background for the Treholt case - and one could see this as the background for the sudden death of president Klestil in Austria at my first (or rather second) attempt to register my address in Vienna in 2004 - and repeated in the death of Jörg Haider when I registered my address in Venice in October 2008 - as if I were a laser-guided bomb on my way to Stephansplatz and public concerns should have required that I be guarded off even before I reach the goal. I hope this is not how my postal communications are considered, and I hope I am not considered a 'laser beam poet' writing with a 'third eye' inspiration. My inquiry to the pensions office in the letter of 25 November 2008 was not an outright 'application' = 'søk-nad' (the word can perhaps also mean a 'searching' as if after a certain place), but it was a normal inquiry which perhaps contains a slight element of 'application' for an answer. Now I do not believe (even if I have not read everything they wrote) that neither Sachs nor Celan would recommend a rejection of me 'at the first attempt', on the contrary I think they were much concerned with not rejecting me and that they certainly were not agents, but clearly if the administrative investments in wedging into the cultural space of the jewish-genetic diaspora also could have included even the Treholt case, that could also have been the background of this imitative repeat of the story from 1999. I have not yet (end of March 2009) got my 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' back from ÖVW in Vienna, cp. the idea of 'fi-nazi-runk-spy-trag' or even 'fiancee-runk-spy-trag'. Was there somebody in the late eighties who had had his colon lifted from behind over to a sort of 'vagina' (cp. the 'Varshinskoe' shosse in Moscow, vs. the colon-associative 'Kashinskoye' shosse) in front? That could in fact - as seen from a general viewpoint - have facilitated an 'arne tre-holt', however mistunderstood that could be (it would have had to mean the origin of a 'Son-of-Man', including a firm grip on the buttocks in the moment of origin - cp. also the attempt on the pope in 1981 and the idea of sexual mutilation after the death of Sachs - contained perhaps in the bombing of the intersection Kashinskoye/Varshavskoye Shosse in Moscow 1999, even for 'Boghazköy'). And could that have been a factor which could lend to me in the current situation a taint of 'monkey business', if not 'bonky misnis'? We must hope that there will be no 'bonky misnis' on a european city. There were some wellingtons - I think on a wooden or metal grid - in the stairway outside the entrance door to a flat ten years earlier. Since one notices a certain possible role in the recent story for my book TEQ #16, that shares parallel text with 'The Dreamer' and hence the political complex around that. As far as Celan's and possibly also Sachs' unpublished manuscripts are concerned, a 'change of genitals' (cp. Delanoe, Lindh) should not have to mean a change in the manuscripts, but maybe there could be an administrative interest in moving the relations of Treholt to Sachs (with the 'grip' of the hand on the photo) over onto the relations with Celan. Hence if administration has guessed that the photo of Sachs from the late sixties could have been a cue for me to recognize her from the first view of the meeting in 1963 (assuming that I did meet her on a certain occasion in Molde in the spring 1963), the same administration could perhaps be interested in moving a possible administrative-engineered 'rejection at the first attempt' from Sachs to Celan in order to wedge inbetween these short meetings which represented my rescue from the apparently rejective program affiliated with the Gröver/'Mengele' background. One could believe that there were british interests also in the norwegian constitution of 17 May 1814. See the article on the revelation in Vilnius on the documents of 17 and 18 (not 11?) May 1944 which seem to indicate that Weiss (Martin, not Anton) had knowledge of the plans for the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki already in 1944. Venice-Vienna-Vilnius could be the axis which turns the name of 'Vibeke Gröver' = 'vi-both g-bottom' into the symbolism on me in MLR April 1957 as a 'fart' which hence could be the 'verboten' spreading out from Vienna - imitated in the reverse function of 11 September 2001 in USA. "The boys of skrima" is perhaps not the same as "the louse of skrima", in particular since Weiss had recommended 'de-lousing' before the prisoners were presented to him. But that could have been precisely the story, since it would leave the 'proof' of Weiss' pre-knowledge of the bombs (and hence that he was an agent for England) as relevant to Nagasaki only and not to Hiroshima. One notices also the 'snor-i stor-lusen' = 'thread in the big louse'. Snorri Stormuson? PESJ's graphics firm 'Storm'? Lockerbie? A louse is perhaps not a hero, though, and not a mouse. Mouse-Louse = MLR, the norwegian abbreviation for a marxist-leninist. Weiss had recommended that the louse be removed before the presentation. (I do not consider myself a 'louse' nor do I want to be 'removed' before my book be published). This is in any case not relevant to my situation. The louse is not a mouse which is not a muse etc. Martin of Dacia is one of the central modistae. Speech act theory attracted some interest some years ago. We must hope that the story with this letter of 25 November 2008 and the following arrangements does not mean that there could be plans for a 'bonky misnis' in the sense of some nuclear bomb on a 'european city' - since that, by the gingersnaps, really means that verbotens spreads out from Vienna. In particular, if the bombs on Moscow 1999 and Hebei in China 2001 were a part of a bridge to Manhattan 2001 for creating the impression that I am the Great Terrorist, I can tell already now that I am not the one who could be behind a nuclear bomb on a european city. If there are such plans for a nuke as a 'bonky misnis' on a 'european city', which then really could mean plans for starting the Black Sea Loop with 'verboten' from Vienna (and one notices that the name of post chief 'Anton Weiss' is precisely this structure relative to Martin Weiss in Vilnius), it could have been planned for the sake of dumping the blame on the jewish-genetic diaspora - for example for a false pretext for continued persecution program of genocidal character. That is also why one could find some reason to speculate if the US democrats could have been involved in the attack on Manhattan 2001 - for making a link to such a catastrophe in Europe. If the US democrats were involved, I think one should publish these facts now instead of waiting for a bomb (or rather a verboten program, spreading like a 'reverse bomb' out from Vienna instead of hitting the 'Stephanskirche') which makes it too late. The Kursk of 2000 could be telling of the nuclear factor. Why is this MLR still published? It really looks like a british responsibility claim to terror through a century and it seems to me to be published by an organization which is sufficiently public to allow for the conclusion that it is a responsibility claim on behalf of the state not only because the state has not yet stopped the publication but even is publishing it themselves (I don't know the details in the organization, though). 'Nuclear bomb on a you're up i en city' could be this strange idea of Son-of-Man conceived through a colon-turned-vagina and the uterus above. See the MLR April 1983 references above to 'Gawain' - cp. 'vagina' - and 'Vulgate'. Reinhard Heydrich. Strange ideas. Strange trans-substance-i-ation. Fiancee-runk-spy-drag. Fi-nacee-runk-spy-drag. Pannekake / ma[e]kake? Round-cac Röver = Stonehenge? Which reduces it all to a phonological = linguistic-semiotic level when the cac is still as round as before but the two letters inside have exchanged order? All this would, though, if one were to drop a nuclear bomb on a european city for weird philosophical reasons, not be much more than the old theme of mass murders elsewhere for the feelings in England - perhaps via Dongr Över (= Övw?) in USA. If 'fi-nazi-runk-spy-drag' even could be about the name of 'Reinhard Heydrich' and that should associate with Shakespeare = 'hage' = 'garden', on can notice that there is an atrium in 'Ehamgasse 21/23'. There was a brief passing in Voldgaten 1 in possibly 1978 which in theory at hindsight could have been interpreted as a mid point in the GAS-PAS-GAS construction. If even these include the three churches in Venice, there is the further notice of just PASsing San Pantalon, some metres on towards Campo Santa Margherita, for finding the right angle point. The San Pantalon itself could then be a sort of 'Rekawinkel' which does not reach entirely out to the right angle - and of course the San Stefano churchtower is a not entirely right Winckel.

11 September 2001 represented, as this analysis has shown, the concept of the AIDSHIV lift in the sense of the area Malvasia Vecchia in Venice, over which the tower of San Stefano hangs. But the attack in 2001 clearly also represented the concept of 'birthday'. If, therefore, the slanting tower represents a slanting penisjust about to leave its biological material in the 'mouth' of a female, as in Tiepolo in Apostoli, there is the characteristic 9 month interval to the birthday. These are the 9 months from the death of Gudmund ('god-mouth') Harlem ('hard-limb') to the Lockerbie bombing, minus one day. Clearly 'Gudmund Harlem' represents just this Tiepolo in Apostoli, John Keats sort of. And then the birthday is in the Tiepolo on Zattere - you can see how the child looks new born and there is a slit in the frock of the lefthand saint - which means that the 9 months are from Apostoli to Zattere - the L of Venice. 'Gudmund Harlem' is also likely to be the 'Gaspar / Haerlem' of 'Martinus Scriblerus' - which seems to be the origin of a Great Falsification Program. One should believe that there are close ties between Harlem and England somehow. Gudmund Harlem was in UK/US when the Dead Sea Scrolls were 'found' and came [back] to Norway thereafter.

There is an L and a K and the 'L-K-hold' of Kristendom (Jean Paul etc) vs. Listendom = Martin Weiss' name lists in Vilnius. Thomas Parnell = Dommes Pernelle = Dommesgasse intersecting with Ehamgasse at #23, which hence means GAS-PAS-GAS.

Club Scriblerus = c-LAK-SCRIBL-MUS = LAKMUS paper with SCRIBT inside = the contents of the 'cigar'. (See also the story from the park). LAB-MUS = Lab-rotten. It must count as a coincidence that Eisenhower has a sort of 'lab' look on some photos. The 58 of Labråten could be about this L and Harlem. The lakmus (or 'litmus') function is the one of Aloysas/Aboysas of Weiss in Vilnius and could be the contents of the Lockerbie bombings. Lockerbie = L-K-by = L-K-city = Venice. Which means that it falls down on Malvasia Vecchia and hence the PAN AM 103A = San Stefano tower.


Ehamgasse intersects at #23 at the corner with Dommesgasse = Thomas Parnell with his mice-frog fish fingers of the Homer (not 'corner') = Ötzi. A sort of 'panzer-Ham'. The 5000 year old character from the glacier could consequently look like a person from Ehamgasse - but the 5000 years would then be a matter of subjective and not objective time, and the body has a look which could be telling of a fate like that. It must have been a real human being. See A.R.Humphreys of MLR April 1947.

Hence Ehamgasse 23 = San Stefano churchtower with a very essential mythological role for the terrorist wellness program from England. But this means that one can model the ups and downs of the pumps from Ehamgasse 23 to Stephanskirche rather than by going via Venice. It means that the nine months are modelled in the road from Simmering to Stephansplatz - Simmeringer Hauptstrasse and that way, tram 71, I think, or underground line U3 from Ottakring to Simmering. (I recall in the first half of the eighties Fjellheim telling about a new music group called 'U2' which were Christians - a new concept - isn't there even a sort of 'giam-Bono' there, one of the 'serifs', sort of?). Hoerbiger produces hydraulic lifts, and the camera there pointing to the entrance door of Ehamgasse could be about such 'modelling' of the ups and downs of the pumping. Or 'monitoring', as is the word in the Scriblerus biography.

But this means that Ehamgasse 23 was not a coincidence and one can probably conclude that I was intrigued around Europe from December 2002 untill I landed in Vienna in July 2004. That tour cost me a lot of time and money and stress relative to the societies I tried to live in. It is not that easy to squeeze a person out of a country without leaving proofs of the squeeze-out - clearly they had to make me believe that I travelled on for my own reasons - which means that it must be done on the level of fundamental confidence where one finally has to conclude that 'in this country one cannot live' and then one travels on to another country. When I came to Berlin in the autumn 2003 I was already rather pessimistic about finding a flat where I could stay, for which reason an antenna drilled into the flat rather than an answer from the israeli embassy was a catastrophe - and a Spü-le instead of a contract was enough reason to search for another place - and when the german foreign minister announced a visit to a school some days later, the terror in Khobar - I think at the time of his visit - convinced me of the deliberate correlation with the announcement in advance and hence a german responsibility claim for getting me out of the country. Today this looks more like a british intrigue for their 'wellness program', which means the terrorist program, although of course I cannot find out of how far into the european administrations the terror intrigue reaches. I have not really been able to use the telephone after some housing disasters in Vilnius and Paris - in Vilnius I tried, for the first time since 1988, to have a telephone attached but the murder of Stephen Saunders (not 'fits and dollars' - nor 'fitts and dancers') in Athens probably in the moment when I lifted the receiver and heard a few words in an alien language - could it have been the greek tongue (cp. Haerlem of Scriblerus)? - in the telephone. I contacted the british embassy about it and the heavy vibrations which trembled therefrom in the telephone told me that the murder had been an attack on their administration - a ridiculous idea indeed - today it means of course only that it was the british administration who had made this terrorist intrigue on my chances to have telephone communications with the outside world. I did find reasons to believe that the massive advertisements all over Vienna did index me and my authorship - and, if so, one could find reason to believe that there are british interests pasted up on the walls all over Vienna. A murder of Haider would then not likely have been for the reason that he was a spy - one could believe rather that it could have been because he was not, sort of. The murder of 'Benazir Bhutto', which seems to have been heralded in advance in MLR, seems to mean simply the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' which it seems to have been the plan that I would not get back when I quite simply would have to move away from the house - but doesn't that quite simply mean that it is a matter of british 'wellness' authority in Vienna? To me it seems that the squeeze-out campaign would already have been going for some time - for example on outdoor advertisements etc, and the 09:52 massacre on the pizza-partying youngsters in Crandon on 8 October allegedly by a 'sheriff' (the town was 'sans sheriff' afterwards, and 'sang sheriff' while it took place) was some days before the death of Kurt Köck - and I did not have any chances to remain in the house - and that was probably because of campaigns which were running in at least the city but maybe on a country level. This suggests that ÖVW should repay me my losses - unless the people of Austria want to subscribe to the same role as they did in the 1930's - when they were simply the 'loopaper' of the british terrorist program and were held in custody after the war untill 1955. The word 'subscribe [to]' is very british and not normally in my vocabulary: It means, according to Penguin, 1) to pay regularly for a periodical, such as for example MLR, 2) to be favourably disposed, 3) to give a written pledge. My english is normally more 'koine', if you see what I mean.

Anna Politowskaja

Anna Stepanowna Politowskaja was murdered by a gunman in the housedoor to her home house on 7 October 2006, at 16:03. She was found by the porter in the lift about an hour later, according to the report on the internet (wikipedia) which also tells that there was a camera surveying the area and the murderer would therefore have been observed there. The place of the doorway corresponds to the door opening in Ehamgasse 23 which was surveyed by the camera at Hoerbiger - the angle of the camera probably just reached the door. Her mid name Stepanowna clearly relates to San Stefano (and 'stepfather') in Venice and Stephanskirche in Vienna, and the Manhattan and Maria Formosa links to 'anathema' could be a part of the reason. The article titles in MLR July 2006 are the following:

1. Anglo-Scandinavian trade or paganism? OE hæðen in the first Cleopatra glossary. By Sara M. Pons-Sanz
2. Resisting 'the spirit of innovation': The other historical novel and Jane Porter. By Fiona Price
3. 'A new and exceedingly brilliant star': L.M.Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables, and Mary Miles Minter. By Faye Hammill
4. Sick humour, healthy laughter: The use of medicine in Rabelais's jokes. By Alison Williams
5. A marriage made in heaven? 'Racine' and 'Love'. By Campbell, John
6. The Orateur in seventeenth-century french theatre companies. By Gossip, C.J.
7. Poetic improvisation in the nineteenth century: Giuseppe Regaldi and Giannina Milli. By Michael Caesar
8. Rivers, roads, and technical considerations: The travel books of Julio Llamazares. By David Henn
9. Colonial tropes and postcolonial tricks: Rewriting the tropics in the novela de la selva. By Lesley Wylie
10. The boundaries of Mitleidsdramaturgie: Some clarifications concerning Lessing's concept of 'Mitleid'. By Thomas Martinec
11. 'Der Schein ist gegen Sie': Physiognomy and honour in Schiller's Der Verbrecher aus verlorener Ehre. By Andrew Cusack
12. The answer Job did not give: Dostoevsky's Brati'a Karamazovy and Camus' La Peste. By Andrea Thomas-Lesic
13. Ossianism in the bohemian lands. By Hlobil, Tomas
14. Heine's ambiguous barbarism: Translation and the rejuvenation of french culture. By Paul Rowe


Article 1 seems to index first this murder of Anna Stepowna Politowskaja = Anglo-Scandinavian Page-trade-ism, then it is put into connection to the end of my Endmorgan Quartet. It was nearly finished in the summer 2005 with book 15 the parallel text to which was ending some 200 fragments before the end of the first chapter of Talmud Erubin - which means that one could guess in 2006 that I would complete the work with a last book going this chapter to the end. The 'Beatrice' concept of Midori was from my poem in the first book 'Hammerfest' (which, by the way, seems to have been installed into Ehamgasse 23 and could have been the background of the death of Köck in 2007) and it could have been predicted that she would return towards the end. The last fragment tells 'HDRN hYLG MBRI' which can be transcribed 'Hederund healg Mibori' - or simply 'Hedelund heard Midori': 'Hedelund' is the signature on the last poem in 'A deep ratch' and it corresponds to the divine donation of the poetry or stone tablets to Moses. The article discusses the historic origin of the word in old norse, the language of the saga and 'eddic' poetry. The word hirðen would rather mean something like the security around the Führer, or Hitler-jugend troops and folks like that. (I notice that Vilhelm Mohnke, the chief of the security of the Führer, was somewhat similar to Fjellheim's father Olsen and to Tveteraas, a constellation which - not the least in the framework of M-L-R - could invoke the idea of 'vil helr ronke' = 'prefers to masturbate' = 'onanism/ossianism'). In my book it is about the donation of the inspiration to the poetry which is parametre 16 in TEQ. The word 'Hede[lund]' - here from the last fragment of the first chapter in Talmud Erubin - is the one discussed in the first article as being "in the first Cleopatra glossary". Hebrew goes from right to left and hence the last is the 'first glossary' = 'cleopatra' backwards = 'art of pulk', as if Politowskaja pulked (cp. the reported finding of her in the lift). I am sure she did not - decent people do not pulk - and there is no chance to see her again in the form of 'Anna Jensen' = 'anna see-him-again'. I don't know if this fragment also could have been the reason for the cartoon 'The Hulk', a green monster I think it is, but one could in any case construct such an origin in 2006. 'Hulk mi bori' = 'sobs at the bier', even these sobs in Rilke's first elegy. Which means that the murder likely would have been a british attempt to gain control with the end of my work - which they had tried to install into Moscow with the bombings in 1999. I don't know how Politowskaja related to England, but clearly if she had good ideas about the country that could have put her in danger, and if she for example as a journalist had investigated the Moscow bombings from the viewpoint of british responsibility, her life would likely have been rescued. "There is nothing a briton hates more than hypocrites", could be the natural slogan after all these years of terror and fraud under the facade of the opposite - for which reason it can be dangerous to not understand the nature of the british state. Therefore also is it very wrong of the public administrations to keep the historic facts secret since it puts innocent people in the danger of nourishing false beliefs about britons. 'Han ha[r] tema' = 'he has a theme', which would be the hebrew parallel and the beginning of the 'arbitrary signification' in 'Hammerfest', which means that my poetic work TEQ would scan the same 'theme' from beginning to end as the 'L' which goes from Zattere to Apostoli in Venice, but from a very different point of view compared with the british terrorist program. 'Anne of Green Gables' could then be a reference to the 'theme' which I had ('Midori' means 'green' and here it would be about goto the door) when I completed the 16th book - which in british philosophy would be comparable to 'anathema' - apparently felt as a threat against the security of their state.

For article 4, I can notice that I wrote the preface to ' be an emperor...' in Sandviken Psychiatric Hospital and dated it 29 January 2000, and added in this preface that the last part of the book was written under the influence of the drug 'olanzapin', which is used against (not for?) schizophrenia, which I was forced to take in the hospital. In fact I started taking the drug around Christmas and on 4 January 2000 there was the train crash disaster at 13:13 at Åstad, a name which means partly the 'Å place' and partly 'the place of the crime' and it can be seen as modelled in the 'Racine' and 'Love' in title 5. This 'Å place' typically means the anus and hence the revelation and hence the 'thirteen bis-nis in the revelation'. It was 'Åsmund Ueland' who was chief of the norwegian railways and he took the full responsibility (and remained in the job). I don't remember exactly when I wrote this line about the 'olanzapin' in the preface but of course it could have been on 24-25 January - but if the britons should have access to such details, they could have needed online access to my computer - or at least tapped it at a later stage, if they could have reconstructed the date of writing. 'Rable' means to 'scrible', and hence this 'medicine in Rabelais's jokes' could be about 'Ulan sa pin': 'Pork og pin de som er'. That would be a part (under the entry written on 24 January 1995 - it appears from the circumstances which could have been detected by surveillance and 'diagonalizations' among data that this 'pork og pin' could relate to 'ulan' (pronounced like 'Ueland'), which then would mean that it was written under the influence of a drug) of my novel "The Dreamer" which seems to have been the target of the bombings in Moscow 1999. 'Sick humour, healthy laughter' - 'criminal smoking' = 'criminal smuggling'? The britons are struggling with their project of remote control of the authorship which does not run as smoothly as it could have been planned, and it could be that they planned this murder of Politowskaja after I had completed book 14 and they could have found alarming redundancies which made them feel that they had to extend the responsibility claims on my work. Also, since book #1 'Hammerfest' seems to have been installed into Ehamgasse 23 (by the two neighbours), the other end of the work would have been at this 'Hedelund' at the end of the chapter. And if I never arrived to the end of that chapter, british administration could have felt that they 'controlled' the virtual end of it.

Article 10 contains the concept of 'Mitleidsdramaturgie' which could invoke associations to Claire Goll's 'Mitwelt' which I wrote about on this website in 2004. It exists in the university library in Graz under the title Claire Studer: Mitwelt. Verlag die Aktion. Berlin-Wilmersdorf 1918. It was 'halvspretta', not 'hals-bretta' which rather would be about the legs folded up to the throat. Graz = Thackeray, vs. Dickens.

On 9 October 2006 I wrote on the internet: "As I was writing on my computer which is not and has never been on the internet, the screen suddenly blacked and the image returned after a few seconds - but upside down. The computer clock - which is fairly precise, so it is likely that the clock was in real local time - must have been rather exactly 18:20 when it happened. I notice that the date is 9/10-2006, which suggests 2 x 9 = 18 and 2 x 10 = 20"". The 2 x 10 = 20 could be about 1947-1957-1968 April issues of MLR. One notices the 'haddington masque' = 'masked person with tons of gunpower 'ink''(?), also in the school shooting in Gutenberg Gymnasium in Erfurt. But in 1947 it was apparently 'hadd iknon maske' = 'had no mask'. If the surveillance camera to Politowskaja's house was not enough to identify the murderer, it could have been because he had changed with 'silicon' his look before he did it and changed it back again afterwards - for example he could have changed it to look like another person, which could have been the strategy in Hebei with Jin Ruchao. I left for a travel to Stockholm and Vilnius several weeks before the election to parliament in Austria in the autumn 2006 (but after July), and Natascha Kampusch was released from her imprisonment (the door to her cave was left open and she could tiptoe out) around the time of my departure. On my return late 5 October 2006, I went for the post early 6 October and found the postbox empty and the post for several weeks returned to senders. There had been no warning before I left, and so it was strictly speaking not according to the rules of austrian post. Then the day after, on 7 October 2006, Politowskaja was shot and on 9 October the upside-down screen in the evening could be about this 6-9 - and the sad mysticism with 'End-Morgen' for Kampusch and Politowskaja on both sides of my travel (see title 8). 'Kvartet' can mean 'stolen' in norwegian, hence the stolen post - which then could have been intended to mean that I had stolen the 'travel book'. Which means that the murder of Politowskaja probably was british as a part of their inability to write their own poetry and they have to try and hijack it from others (there cannot be any other explanation to this phenomenon). I was shown in a computer shop that there exists a key combination which can be used under Windows for turning the screen upside-down, or maybe it must be done in two steps, but I don't think I had happened to hit upon that combination. But in the entry of 25.9.94 in my novel, I wrote about another strange phenomenon when the cursor suddenly hopped one page up and intruded into the word 'explanation' leaving the form 'BC 7466lanation 6', and the '-xp-' was gone. Which means that if there had been interactive access to my computer, the pirates could perhaps have tried to tell themselves that they 'controlled' my writing and hence were part of the authorship - and the murder of Politowskaja would have been put in connection with the bombings of 1999. In addition to this, there are the 9 months from 25/1 to 25/9 in the diary novel.

Brati'a Karamazovy: The person who hit me in my back in Bratislava on 31 January 2006 was somewhat similar to Fjellheim. Could in theory have been his brother. If he were out on a 'job' the situation was that I had just photographed something when he came over towards me with a lifted fingers and articulating a question when I saw that it meant trouble and pretended that I did not see him and walked away, after which he hit me in the back so that I fell on the ground. If I had had my computer in the little rucksack (school size) it would have been crushed ('knörva' if it were e.g. paper). I don't know what he was about to ask but it was not I who was out for a job. However, I later used the photo with an old poem of mine annotated to it. I also took a photo of the nearby street 'Grösslingova' where there were the surveillance cameras on the wall for nearly every second metre. Politowskaja was perhaps as similar to a former girlfriend of mine (whose name graphically resembled 'Charles Dickens' somewhat) as this person was to Fjellheim, and the former girlfriend was one of the first I met after having shaved my beard off in Oslo in the first half of the nineties. She happened to walk the same street as me. (She did not notice the change of my look, or what was it?) That should not make me a 'Verbrecher aus verlorener Haire' - or simply 'kebir knörva'. 'Forloren hare' is a wellknown norwegian dish - stewed meat or something like that. See the 'barbarianism' of title 14 with the 'rejuvenation of french culture'. 'Julio Llamazares' could be about 'jommen sa jeg s-MÖR' (for example from a travel diary of some christmas) - but 'forloren hare' is not the sort of meat which is 'mör'.

Article 8 with "Rivers, roads, and technical considerations" could be related to the authorship of John William Grover in British Library which includes the 1866 title "Estimates and diagrams of Railway Bridges for Turnpike, Public and Occupation Roads, in the embankments of double or single lines, and cuttings of double lines, etc.". The turnpike and public occupation could also be about the post which was returned to sender when the postbox was emptied probably shortly before the election to parliament. Milli in 7 vs. Willi in 8 suggests a 'very wild/mild winter' in 3 - could be a fragment of a conversation, or could be the cover of my TEQ #15 'Gentlemen'. That cover has a black-and-white cover = schwarz-weiss umschlag = polit ovskaja. One notices also the tigers in Nandan Kanaan Zoo. If my computer is tapped, there would in 2006 still have been no traces of book #16 - it was all and only in a well locked-down handwritten manuscript and I typed it into my small computer in December 2007. A reference to the end of the work would be about the end of the first chapter of Erubin. (What is at the end of the chap-tear?) And then it reads Cleopatra backwards for 'art of pulk' and could be 'art of weiss' and even forwards = the other way. The 'Anna' and the one stepping over the other. But that also suggests Anton Weiss in Vienna - chief of the post.

In short, the MLR July 2006 contains evidence that it was british administration who murdered Anna Stepowna Politowskaja for the purpose of extending the terror implementation of my authorship into russian culture, probably quite simply for a general campaign against me. This seems possibly to have been coordinated with the activities of Austrian Post where Anton Weiss is or at least then was chief, although there is no mention of the post in MLR except for title 9 with the 'postcolonial tricks' - and of course they could not know in July that I would go for a travel in August-September. Weiss' name is the opposite of 'my art in black' = 'my art of pulk' when the computer screen turned around. If that turning computer screen means that somebody had been in there while I was away, it could even have been the explanation to why I could not find the receipt to the payment of the PO Box. I came back from Vilnius where I had in fact just found the data on Martin Weiss. Hence the story with the post could have been added due to my activities in Vilnius. What is noteworthy is that the sad story of the murder of Politowskaja seems to have been british while the story with the post was austrian.

Clearly this british terrorism cannot continue without other administrations assigning due responsiblity to the british administration, and one has to start a tribunal which can sentence the state of England in absentia if they do not agree to it. The international tribunal has to publish the necessary data. One cannot leave it to me to battle the british empire of evil while everybody else let themselves be cheated by their strategies to believe in cheap tricks of inner emotions of satan when they have anything to do with me. The feeling of satan is the british terrorism, not me, and one must bring to the daylight this british program of launching themselves with terror on my authorship.

It is likely that the britons must feel that they have got a sort of 'carte blanche' for their orgy of murders from other states, otherwise it is difficult to understand it. Could be 'politics' is inclined to understand such a logic on basis of the long traditions since Scriblerus Club and all that. But this is something which any state administration cannot allow England to continue with: If they should have allowed for it, it would have had to be based on a referendum: For or against mass murder. While waiting for state administrations to wake up, independent organizations could start preparing for the continuation of the Nürnberg trials.

Some comments on the first article in MLR July 2006

This is about the article by Pons-Sanz which seems to be about the end of the first chapter of the Talmud Erubin.

It was in 2007 that I gave a copy of my TEQ 1-15 to the library in Literaturhaus in Vienna. Some days later, I got a letter from I think 'Autoren/Autorinnen', the authors' interest organization in Austria who also have their offices on the same floor of the Literaturhaus, informing me that a recent initiative from I think Germany had suggested that copyright to texts should apply only to texts with proper orthography and not to misspelt texts. This immediately struck me as strange since it clearly had to be a british and not a german initiative. It seemed to suggest that since there were some words with a strange spelling in my book, I did not have the copyright to it. It had to be an intrigue from probably London and it was not so nice to get the letter, although I had to speculate that could have been sent with the nice intention of telling me what factually was going on in the european cultural landscape nowadays.

It is only today in 2009 that I find what could be a possible background for this story - in the article by Sara M.Pons-Sanz in MLR July 2006 - the issue which seems to encode Anna Stepowna Politowskaja - on the word 'hæðen' in the socalled 'first Cleopatra Glossary' - the glossary apparently being another document rescued from the flames of Robert Cotton's library in 1731, along with Beowulf and possibly other uniques. The article starts as follows:

"In his book on Norse-derived terms in Middle English, Erik Björkmann suggests that 'if a word in English has a form which cannot be explained by means of internal English sound-laws, but which is easily accounted for by assuming a Scandinavian origin, we are, for the most part, entitled to consider the word in question a Scandinavian loan-word'. This statement remains undisputed and scolars still consider that the phonological form of a term is the most reliable evidence of its Norse origin. One of the phonological features we can rely on when attempting to identify a Norse loanword in English is the different evolution in West and North Germanic of PIE */dh/ and the voiced fricative resulting from the operation of Verner's Law on PGmc */?/ < PIE */t/. While the consonant is always occluded in West Germanic, it tends to remain as a fricative in North Germanic unless it appears in initial position, after a nasal or liquid consonant, or when it is geminated".

This text seems to exhibit a british occupation with 'fricatives' of scandinavian origin, veiled in scholarly jargon. If the articulation is a 'fricative', then it is likely to have come from a scandinavian, otherwise it could be british. The style could be telling of british scholarship if the pretext is more important than the text - which could be about the origin of the ideas of copyright or authorship to 'misspelt words', such as I got from Literaturhaus in Vienna. The article seems to attempt to prove that the authorship of the 'fricative' (MLR April 1957) is norwegian and the real text is british. Werner Larsen is an electrics and electonics seller in central Fredrikstad, at the end of Nygårdsgata, with the library (not to be confused with any sort of 'cigar'-shaped archive) in the other end. Verner's Law - also on notable friction in the end of certain articulations - is essential to studies in old 'germanic' philology. The scholarly article goes, on p.628, also on the issue of 'strange spoiling':

"Thus, the pair heden-hæðen could provide us with yet another example of the attestation of a native term and a loanword borrowed from the Norse cognate. [SCHOLARLY FOOTNOTE: Cf. two terms referring to the act of spoiling, as well as the actual spoils, of the slain: walreaf < ON valr + OE reaf in LawWal I vs wælreaf < OE wæl + OE reaf in Fates 95, ClGl I (Stryker) 3923 and ClGl 3 (Quinn) 629. On the different reflexes of PGmc */a/ in Old Norse and Old English as exemplified by the determinants of the two compounds, see Noreen, p.68; and Hogg, pp.80-84 respectively]. However, despite the supporting arguments presented above, neither gloss from the First Cleopatra Glossary has necessarily to be interpreted as an Old Norse loanword and, indeed, the extant evidence seems to support a native rather than a Norse origin for these terms. The possible attestation of OE scinn will be tackled first beause it seems to be the least complex. / An explanation of ClGl 1 (Stryker) 3388 should start by looking at a gloss in London, British Library MS Additional 32246, one of the manuscripts of the so-called Antwerp Glossary. In AntGl 4 (Kindschi) 1031 cin renders both L mentum 'chin', its common lemma (cf. ClGl 1 (Stryker) 2260, ÆGl 298.7), and imes. Meritt finds this combination of lemmata very puzzling and, indeed, it is hard to see any relationship between a term meaning 'chin' and another which is interpreted as meaning 'membrane'."

It should be noticed that the word 'chin' in norwegian means 'cheek', the membrane hanging loosely at the side (vang) of the oral cavity, while in english it means the 'chin' which in norwegian is 'hake', the rooting of Hitler's 'swastika' = 'hake-kors'. It is a word which typically can be misconceived in english by a norseman, in which case it is easy to see the relation between 'chin' and 'membrane'. In short, one can easily hide a cigar in a colon but not in a vagina (without risking the discovery of it in coitus, unless it is of the intra-uterine 'coilin' type which generally is not available to males) unless the vagina is a colon-turned-vagina, cp. the socalled 'Gawain' (MLR April 1983), but then the anus must be closed and cannot remain open for ordinary frication behind. Such vaginas can be installed also on males. If I once should have noticed a certain facial similarity of HOG (Hans Ove Granath) with Walraff, that is not because I had read this article, but it may be that the idea could have originated there nevertheless. I have no reason to believe that HOG = Walraff. Nor that Politowskaja pulked and left a similar person behind.

Clearly, if a cigar should be found inside the body of a person, it is likely to be about a false identity and hence the authorship to the text is not certain. It is then likely to be about 'loan-words', and, as the article shows, these are more likely to have a british origin than an origin in a scandinavian male with colon-vagina in front (strange spelling!) and claims about authorship to poetry.

The article discusses West and North Germanic but does not make more explicit the discussion of the 'initial position, after a nasal or liquid consonant, or when it is geminated' as quoted above. Why should that attract interest?

These things are important for me to tell because my poetic project would also recognize 'heden' as an interesting object of etymological study from the poetic viewpoint, but for very different reasons. The word 'Hedelund' in my poem at the end of TEQ book #10 derives from the probably old norwegian word 'hede' which means a wide highland low-vegetation plain of typically moorland, grass and heather. 'Lund' means a 'grove', and hence 'Hedelund' means a little grove on or at the end of the vast plain. It is a humble symbol of divinity. 'Å vandre heden' = 'to walk the plain' is a norwegian wording for 'to die'. 'Hede Lund' or rather 'hete Lund' can also mean 'to have the name Grove[r]'. Or, in an older form, 'to have the name called Grove[r]' = a 'Grover'. In the article on Visthouse, I discuss the phenomenon of 'naming of the place' in Sachs' letter on her return to Stockholm in 1960:

"On her return from Paris where she had visited the Celans (and got the letter from Paul Celan with the information he had acquired - the letter which apparently disappeared some time later) to Stockholm on 18 June 1960, she very quickly sent a letter to them: "Ihr meine geliebten Drei, nach dem Abschied und dann durch die Luft gezogen und dann aussteigen, abgerissen - aber Ihr wart vorausgeeilt, auf schwedischem Boden das Gras einen Augenblick goldgrün wie nur in Kinderträumen". A closer study of the Greek etymologies in 'Akhilleus' allows for recognition of it in just this line from Sachs: 'The yellow-green (or golden green) grass of childhood dreams', which means that Iliad I.54 apparently can be translated as follows: 'The yellow-green grass of childhood dreams calls the people the naming of the place'."

Which means that the naming of place is what the people is called by the 'rainbow' which is constituted by 'the golden yellow grass of dreams of childhood' = 'red orange yellow green blue indigo violet', which is what Sachs refers to in terms of her travel through the air. This rainbow is - according to my own etymological studies - what the ancient Greeks called 'Akhilleus' and what modern politics-gone-astray recognizes in reduced form as the 'L-K-hold' of 'dipsomaniac' Venice. It really means the poetic reality - which here calls the people for the naming of the place which is 'called Grove[r]' as the grove on or at the end of the vast plain in my interpretation. It consequently means, in particular in the framework of the hebrew fragment at the end of the first chapter of the Erubin, the people of Israel or the jewish-genetic diaspora being called - by the poetic reality - the naming of the place - and for the case of 'Hedelund' that means 'to be called Grove[r]' - the grove of the plain. These are the essentials of the form 'Hedelund' in my work, but clearly these aspects of it are totally absent from Pons-Sanz' discussion of 'heden'. Neither does she discuss 'East Germanic'. This meaning of 'hede' as a plain is, at least to my intuition of norwegian language, more fundamental than the associations around 'huden' which means 'the skin'. But Pons-Sanz seems to have missed the point when she focusses all and only on the skin and hide associations to the form and hide away any senses of a 'plain' ('heath' - which is the proper 'fricative' form). The impression from the article is that it - in the context of the murder of Politowskaja, and why not add Haider two years later - serves to prove that 'Hede' is a form which means 'dirty beast' (hairy, furry), more or less in the revelation ('Lund'), could be where the fricatives (MLR April 1957) are, and that is when it rather explicitly points to Hedelund and to the end of Erubin chapter 1. The discussion centres on the concept of a 'hairy monster' which also is a pagan who denies God. She refers to Isidore's ideas about those wearing such skins that they are transformed into 'beasts', which she associates with the icelandic 'berserkirs' who in that time were thought of as being transformed into ferocious animals in the fury of their battles and, as is a normal idea but not mentioned by Pons-Sanz, under the effect of drugs - not olanzapin but natural mushrooms (although one must believe that these ideas about berserkirs are about as old as the Scriblerus Club). "However, it is highly debatable whether an Anglo-Saxon reader would have had the same reaction" (p.632) - it is a scandinavian who goes berserk with fricatives, that means. The rest of the article, more than another 5 pages, is almost totally devoted to this idea of 'heden' as a godless 'hairy beast', and completely ignores any associations to the highland plains of my concept. Towards the end the conclusion goes - on the phenomenon of the fricative vs. closure in the middle of the form 'he-in' (cp. also the brown quadrant in the corner of San Pantalon, diagonally opposite to the m-armor group): "However, I hope to have shown that we do not need to rely on ON heðinn to understand the gloss under consideration. It can (and most probably should) be interpreted as a mistake for , a mistake which could have arisen simply from the formal similarity between and and from this similarity in conjunction with the context of the rendered lemma". This 'rendered lemma' could in fact be not totally unrelated to the foreskin removed from my penis in 1982, under the narcosis of GAS (could be as one leg of the GAS-PAS-GAS structure), and the curtain of the temple was 'rent in twain'. This is the 'skin' ('hide', cp. 'Jörg Haider') which was removed in 1982 and which thereby provided for a formal similarity with 'the people of Israel' who speak hebrew. I do not believe that they could have changed the head of the penis (a coup d'etat, cp. 'art of pulk' with 'unbuttoning of shirt' = 'kle a patra') in the same operation in 1982, though, even if that should or could have been theoretically possible if there were a convenient corpse with such a 'head' available, and even if the initial name 'Erik Björkmann' can be taken to mean 'is not on jerkmann'. I suppose they just sewed - not sawed! - the skin around the border and the resulting form did not later appear to be unfamiliar to me and urination was possible very quickly after I had woken up, without any particular sensations in the tube inside. I also believe that I was not unconscious for a longer time - some hours it was, perhaps even over the night, but not more, I think. (I think I woke up in the afternoon the same day - but I think I recall that it was painful for some days or even more thereafter if it started to expand by going up - I naturally assigned that to the sewn border and I suppose that was the explanation). Although I do not write my poetry with my penis, some people may perhaps think that the 'writing-head' of the penis is what gives the copyright to poetry. I do not share those views. But clearly such claims of a 'new head' with a concomitant 'strange spelling' (to get a new penis-head installed is not the same as having the colon reshaped into a vagina) could be an idea set in circulation e.g. by research networks producing all sorts of weird british ideas (for example, who could have eaten that original head if it had been removed?). I can add that although I do not believe that somebody swapped my penis-head with somebody else's in 1982, there could of course have been two agents who interchanged cigars in the 'he-in', but I don't know anything about that. Pons-Sanz refers to Eric L.Fitch for ideas of 'linking views' when it comes to worshipping of horned figures. I suppose I would have sensed it later if somebody had put in a cigar in my colon in 1982. It was hard for the author to see any connection between a chin and a membrane in the beginning of the article, but maybe not towards the end. The article of Pons-Sanz ends with a surprise twist, as if the 'jerkmann' had got a new head, sort of: "From a wider perspective, this study should be taken as a caveat against a possible trap set up by Björkmann's comment. The phonological form of a term is rightly interpreted as our most reliable evidence for its etymological study. However, the apparent possibility of associating an English term with a Norse word may lead us to adopt what seems to be the easiest option without looking for other solutions which, albeit harder to identify, might be more appropriate". This looks a little like a changed head of construction in the end, as if the end of the article should be 'sans point-Schwanz'. Roton-duropean, diagonally across the room or not. "...our most reliable evidence for its etymological study" sounds as if the reader and the writer have exchanged seats, and consequently as if the 'missing point' about the 'plain' is an omission which the reader - or even I - would be blamed for and not the real author of this article (Pons-Sanz). 'Foreskin' is similar to norwegian 'forskning' which means 'research'.

In short, this first article in MLR July 2006 seems to have been correlated with the murder of Politowskaja for the specific purpose of hijacking my 'Hedelund' concept from the end of TEQ book #10. It seems to be quasi science somewhat missing the or at least a point and being driven or at least be accompanied by terror it seems to try and 'take the place' ('plassen-ta'). The article in fact seems to be a sort of a scholarly-looking discussion of a few handpicked words from some possibly dubious sources. The effect of this redundancy seems to be to provide the terror in Moscow with quasi-philological mysticism for creating the mythology which can be used for further terror-driven programs.

A brief summary of Pons-Sanz' article could suggest that the first half is about 'Heden' and the second part is about 'dirty beast'. If, then, this 'dirty beast' is associated with me as 'Grover' = 'Lund' (cp. Kursk-and-Cole 2000), then the article sort of says 'Hedelund' and adds some comments on the pagan godlessness of it - which perhaps means Satan. A 'Richard Dance' (not 'Fitts and Dancer' or 'Stephen Saunders') is credited with some comments and suggestions. Is there anything interesting as far as etymological observations are concerned in the article? I cannot determine if it adds anything to old english/germanic philology since I am no expert in that particular field.

One could guess that the article serves to display the concept of me as a 'dirty beast' representing the jewish-genetic diaspora and it omits those aspects of my concept of 'Hedelund' which are interesting from a poetic viewpoint - and the purpose of the article, not the least via the murder of Politowskaja, could then be to turn the roles around for hijacking this concept. For whom? The interests in fricatives in the middle of the form 'he-in' could point to the brown quadrant at the 'pulley' in the corner of San Pantalon - with the IBAN and BIC AFFE axis across the room.

Pons-Sanz, who allegedly was at Nottingham university in 2006, seems to have been published on John Benjamins, the publishers I had sent my manuscript to when it was rejected in concert with the Oklahoma bombing in 1995. The strategy could look a little similar: The MLR article is a sort of 'negative imprint' of my 'Hedelund' concept. References to the MLR article on the 'haeden' form can be found in a series of entries on internet. Nord-Ost Germanic is not discussed in the article. Neither is Gottfried, Gotfried or Otfried from MLR April 1957. Pons-Sanz credits 'Judith Jesch' - not any 'jewish cheese' like a Brie of MLR April 1970 - for inspirational scepticism. There is also a credit to 'Emma Petty' for comments on Aldheim - I notice that some anonymous donor now and then has been putting 2000 NOK = 250 euros in cash into my bank account. I don't remember if that happened around those times of July 2006.

I have no reason to believe that the 'Nord-Ost' theatre performance in Moscow was based on secret intelligence data on mistreatment of Celan in some desolate building in the outskirts of Paris between 20 April and 1 May 1970, such as by reduction of his body to a 'cheese'-like substance a la 'Ötzi'. But perhaps british anglican secret service could have given the chechen 'Nord-Ost' theatre host[age]-takers such data for telling them that the russians had made this successful theatre on basis of such cruel data, perhaps even for telling them that the war is because of 'chew-gen' reasons. 'Jöde-ost' = 'jew-cheese' (cp. 'chew-Jes[us]), which suggests by 'nöde-ost' (forcing it down the gullet, like the 'battle of frogs and mice' of 'Ötzi') an N/J alternation which could mean 'England' = 'ejglajd', cp. 'Cleopatra'. Then 'England' rewrites to 'Clanpentra' or 'Celan-Paul [Pessach]' (cp. the skin-feign 'cap' called 'pessar' in norwegian). 'Carpenter' was the profession of the person who shared some similarities with Politowskaja. 5 October 1994 was the day of great success in my diary novel when I had managed to predict a car number in advance: I walked with a feverish excitement for a kilometre or so for coming to the spot when I had conjectured that a 666 should occur and there it came right up the street. The entry for this day ends as follows: "So, maybe the Smith period is over? Then what comes next? Maybe the CARP ENTER? My book was rejected by LEA, after four months, last week. Their telephone number is 6664110, Hillsdale, New Jersey". Hils til en jöde-ost? Hils til Nord-Ost? As if my diary novel should have pronounced a support to the bombings of Moscow 1999 because of the 'chew-Jes[us]' symbolism so strikingly in contrast with the british inclinations in the spiritual domains. With that 'Hils til jöde-/Nord-Ost', the telephone number next to it could be the background of presence of a semi-veiled reference to 'Stephen Saunders'.

It may be even worse than this: While the british government in public may be struggling to reach peace in northern Ireland, they conduct heavy terror around the world for the sake of their religious wellness and for preventing dryness of the british sunday souls. But since this british death cult is not permitted they made me as a mythological figure they could keep under secret surveillance and use data from in order to conduct terror while publically pretending the opposite. But that is possible only as long as the facts of the british involvement are kept secret. The MLR is enough proof.

What remains totally incomprehensible is that the politicians of the world seem to accept the british death cult as a valid form of religion - including the element of british persecution of the Jews - and leave it to little me to spend my best years with digging in this dirt on basis of my very limited knowledge - I just happened to come across an issue of MLR by coincidence and that is how I could find out of it - while it must be obvious that political administration knows that England is abusing me in this way for carrying out systematic 'religious' crimes and mass murders. Why do the politicians with access to the data respect those criminals? That MLR is still publised? It was as late as 2003 that I personally travelled to England with the idea in mind of possibly settling there! - quite simply because there are no chances available in the public space for understanding the close links between terror (in particular on my authorship!) and England. What was the british involvement in Chechnya before the war began? The britons are not likely to turn around by themselves and find a better religion - 100 years of that periodical is enough proof. "Disgusting chew-Jes[us]" is their hypocritical 'find-a-better-religion!' reason for choosing the way of terror instead of standing there masticating biscuits - there is repeated mention in Pons-Sanz article of the latin word 'mastruca' and even Isidore's idea of it as 'monstrous' and perhaps more or less 'hairy', cp. 'Harriet Westbrook'. The northern Ireland conflict is so very easy to understand on this background of the anglican death cult - but what remains totally incomprehensible is that the normal anglicans are not given the chance to understand it themselves since they are not presented with the data of terror but the great bulk of them must probably believe that their religion is a normal decent one which is not involved in terror. On the contrary they feel disgusted by the hairy biscuit. Such terror! Their church is not involved in terror? It definitely is! - says the northern Ireland conflict, and true that is indeed. It is enough to present the facts and they talk for themselves. And indeed people have the most explicit right to have those facts - it is NOT PERMITTED to keep the facts secret. If an initiative be taken to start a people's independent investigation to give a description of the extent of the spread of the british nazi terror-and-fraud program over the world, one should include a detailed study of this MLR, also from the viewpoint of finding out to what extent the authors to the articles are fictive or if they really exist. The name of Pons-Sanz seems to be somewhat exposed in the context of this article on the internet. Are the bulk of the articles in the periodical pure nonsense motivated by the terror more than philological considerations? Then a detailed study of the periodical should probably make it possible to present it as a ground-solid proof of the british state terrorism.

It is the obvious relevance of this issue of MLR July 2006 for the murder of Politowskaja in Moscow which justifies this discussion. It is well possible that this article represents what can be called 'the peak of british scholarship'. Their 'crown jewels'. I am not in the position to determine for the time being whether the article by 'Sara M.Pons-Sanz' could be something like 'Pure Nonsense', in which case 'Solidtowskaja' could have been the association, and hence possibly even 'Anne Kr. Sollid-owskaja', a solid christian host etc. which the russians had to swallow. Tram 71 in Vienna goes from 'Schwarzenbergplatz' via Rennweg and Simmeringer Hauptstrasse and Etrichstrasse to Kaiserebersdorferstrasse and back again. Which means that it goes from Stephanskirche to Ehamgasse and passes Klaus Demus on the way - and 'close the he-mus' is approximately the theme of the article about the 'he-in' with mid articulation, stop or fricative. Funny, if you sit in a train and a group of britons come in, they soon start talking your thoughts as if they did not have any themselves. Could be they have a bad conscience they don't know about.

Bloody Sunday

If the british program on me was to make a secret switchboard of reference for terror for making the british sunday souls less dry, the socalled Bloody Sunday in [London]Derry in Northern Ireland on 30 January 1972 could have been the start not only of what is called 'The Troubles' in Ireland (one notices also the 'ho-drab-sdreulige' of Gandhi 1948 and 'hochab-' of Hitler's postcard and a certain 'Traplös'/'Drablös' event in 1979) but also the adult career of me as this 'dirty beast', sort of, for the program of the british death cult. The massacre seems to have been announced in the October 1971 issue of MLR - see above. (For the January 1972 issue see below). The possible reference to Hugo Frias Chavez in Venezuela (although inprinciple this could have been a name added to the interpretation only years later and the MLR Jan 1972 story could be primary) could mean that the Bloody Sunday could have been correlated with me growing into the puberty of the teens. The two first titles seem to suffice for indexing the day 30 january 1972 and the place Londonderry:

1. Theme and structure in Middlethon's 'A game of chess'. By Roussel Sargent
2. Problems of the middle style: La Fontaine in eighteenth-century England. By Rosamund G.Eland

A game of dress = a game of Derry. Cp. also the 'cheese'. Also the middle tones of the word 'Middlethon' is about the two letters L and D and hence it gives Lon-Don-Thon and the game of it is 'London-derry'. Roussel Sargent = Bloody Sunday. Middlethon's = Michelson = Fanny Kaplan's attempt on Lenin on 30 August 1918 at the Michelson factory, after which Lenin was turned into a 'host' for the Klipra connection in 1924, which could be the theme and the structure: The theme is the host and the structure is the shooting. The date 30 January 1972 of Bloody Sunday is then represented in the date 30 August 1918. The role of the 'Dogside' part of Londonderry would then have been about the role of the doctorate in the story of the british hijacking of Lenin's revolution via the Klipra connection. Lenin-Gandhi-Bloodysunday = 24+24 years, cp. Gandhi-Lennon-Reagan-pope of 1980-81. The british authorities had (Microsoft Encarta) announced the possibilities for custody without formal charges and thereby provoked the demonstration as a sort of 'revolution' against the suppressors. It was the Derry Civil Rights Association who arranged the demonstration. January = Anjuary = August, while 1918 = 1981 = 1972 due to the final y as initial j - this is emphasized by the second title: Middle style = Michelson, 18th sent-you-re = 1918 turns to 1981 = 1972. Middle style = Michelson means that La Fontaine = L of one [s]end = 1981 turns into 1972. L = 7 upside down, like the n/u. Eland = Ireland. Rosamund = bloody. G = 6 = Sunday if one adds a 1 for the 7. 'L'education sentimentale'. By P.R.Grover = Labråten 58 etc. The 'Derry Peace' = 'Döri bis' = 'dörnökl' = 'door-key'. British 'Bloody Sunday' = gaelic 'Domhnach la Fola': The tenant in the flat in Ehamgasse before me was called Dornhackl, which also sounds like 'dörnökl' = 'door-key', which indeed seemed to be the theme there with the camera angle probably just catching the keyhold where people turned their keys around. 'Domhnach la Fola' = 'Problems of the middle style: La Fontaine'. This also means that since the MLR October 1971 has these independent motivations, the co-reference to the birth of Midori - with 'Middlethon' etc - is something which has been discovered later (which means that the prodigy was not a chemical product made be Mengele's verboten methods) - and clearly this could have been a part of the background for the use of the 'Hedelund' from the end of Erubin chapter 1 for the murder of Politowskaja.

The third title from October 1971 is "Scott and 'Marmion': The discovery of identity. By John Pikoulis" which suggests 'shots and my army-on'. It was the british army which was called out to guard the demonstration which ended in the massacre as a remedy against the dryness of the british sunday souls. The fourth title seems to be telling of these 'shots on the arms', in the sense of 'drugs': "Turgenev and George Eliot" reads backwards (as for 'John Pikoulis' instead of 'John Pils-oulis') 'toilet rökten e Phenergan' ('toilet he smoked a Phenergan'): I was given the drug 'Phenergan' against allergics in my childhood. If there is a 'quack' in the fourth title, it is not me. Could it be Gröver/'Mengele' was a quack? And if somebody smoked a cigar in the toilet, it was not me. Somebody lost the cigar = 'The princess Casamassima' in the toilet? But if this were in 'L'education sentimentale' = 'Labråten 58', the 'pop-art' of title 6 could rather have been about the contents of this cigar. Etc. This sort of reading is the same as for MLR January 1948 for Gandhi relative to the nomination letter of Oftedahl.

In short, would it have been my ejaculation - my genetics - which was the british bullets? As for the case of Stephen Saunders when I lifted 'röret' = 'the receiver'? 'Stephens Håndklær' = 'Stephen Stövel'. The people of Iceland, the people of Ireland, the people of Israel? If so, one would believe that the britons are not developed like other people. It is not permitted for other countries to consider such a national abuse of my person a legitimate political project and respect the british death cult as a justified part of the political world. Clearly the british strategy could be to let e.g. Jews (and other people) recognize in me the bad sides of british policy and vice versa. Iceland, Ireland, Isrl-and and finally Ingl-and makes for the butterflied equation s=g and r=n, which means that both forms are a little 'short' ('stutt') in the handwriting: This could have been the nazi Arbeits-Erziehungs-Lager = 'AEL' camp 'Stutthof' (for the 'Isr-AEL') which was opened on 2 September 1939 as a 'Civil Prisoner Camp' ('Zivilgefangenenlager', Schwarz p.227) which can be recognized in the 'Civil Rights Association' of Londonderry 1972. In 1941 it was reorganized to an SS Sonderlager = S-N-D-R-lager which by the 'SS' makes for identity and by the 'd' introduces the russian handwriting 'g' = 's-n-g-r' and in 1942 it was turned into a KZ = Konzentrationslager which could mean closing the gaps in the handwriting. (Bjarne Eidsvig was a 'song-composer' = 'songer-lager', not the least with texts by Aron Eidsvig). This means that the british provokation against civil rights in Londonderry could well have been for the explicit reason of making for this chain of misunderstandings, including hopes for a jewish misunderstanding of me as Satan and identification of England as their best friends. Then a british program on making 'cheese' a la 'Ötzi' out of the Jews by way of verboten chemicals does not really make sense - clearly it must be about some mixmax of roles. But then it is not permitted by the israeli authorities to accept such strategies: Of course they have to tell the jewish people what this story is. 'Khan Yunis' does not mean that the britons can hurry up and shoot themselves - it rather means 'Bloody Sunday' at my first attempt to get in some very faint contact with Jews in Vienna. Nor was the bombing of Lebanon in 2006 stimulating for my relations with the Jews. To keep it on ambiguities is only a way to help the british death cult program continue - as it has done since the days of Adolf Hitler.

Articles in MLR January 1972:

1. Some second thoughts on central themes. By Richard Levin
2. Boswell at work: The 'animadversions' of Mrs Piozzi. By Irma S.Lustig
3. Scott, pictures, and painters. By J.D.W.Murdoch
4. Special pleading and art in 'Middlemarch': The relations between the sexes. By Lloyd Fernando
5. The love theme in Chrétien de Troyes's 'Chevalier de la Charrette'. By Fanni Bogdanov
6. Mérimée and pictorial inspiration: The sources of 'Les ames du purgatoire'. By C.W.Thompson
7. 'La donna del lago': The first italian translations of Scott. By Mary E.Ambrose
8. 'Casa con dos puertas': Towards a definition of Calderón's view of comedy. By J.E.Varey
9. Brentano's 'O Stern und Blume': Its poetic and emblematic context. By Elisabeth Stopp
10. Variations on the theme of war: Notes on a group of poems by Ehrenstein. By Alfred D.White
11. Paul Celan's modes of silence: Some observations on 'Sprachgitter'. By Corbet Stewart
12. 'Iconoclasm' as a structural device in three of Gorky's stories. By C.J.G.Turner

Title 1 links this to the October 1971 issue - here it is a second thought on the themes. The theme seems from the redundancies to be a camera view to me climbing naked in through the ground floor window of Labråten 58, probably in the late summer or early autumn 1971. The first article starts: "Certainly the most popular method of analysing an Elisabethan play today is in terms of a 'central theme' which it or its author is said to be 'exploring' or 'making a statement about'. This thematic approach has now become so widespread and so well established that it has practically attained the status of a new critical orthodoxy". It is likely to be about a zoom and slow motion studies of the behind with the writhing anus - for the similarity with the 'brown' figure with the pulley in the corner of San Pantalon. The mirror article 12 tells of possible camera recording and it can also be read: "Gikk hun i klasse med en söster av..." Of Thorvald Stoltenberg? Of a red one? Corky stories could be about the 'Royal Oak' or other genetics.

The concerns with such a camera view could be recognized also in the details of Tintoretto's 'Last supper' in San Trovaso, such as the turner with the J/G see etc., the zooming in on the 'bread' etc. This finds it correlate in title 7) for Ibsen's 'Fruen fra havet' ('The woman/wife from the sea') as a spooned rewrite of 'Bread and wine' into 'wed and/in brine' for my 'Bjarne' name inserted into the mid writhing point of the traditional 'Ronk Röver'. Title 3 tells of the 'shot' in 'm-army-on' of title 3 of MLR October 1971 and hence this last supper picture and the painter 'Tintoretto' = 'the ink right onto/into' = 'Haddington'. The mirror image to this seems to be the poem which Sachs included in the 1963 selection of her poetry (a group of poems) by Enzensberger and which seemed to be about her meeting with me in Molde. It is a hypothesis that this could have been along with Ragnar Thoursie who then could have been taken to represent the MDLVI inscription in the pillar to the chapel with that Tintoretto. The mirror symmetry could carry over to the second and second-to-last titles - about Paul Celan and 'Boswell at Work' which then could be interpreted - on the background of MLR April 1970 - as 'Jean Bollack' or 'Bollack at Paul'. Title #11 is allegedly written by the name 'Corbet Stewart' (London) which perhaps could rewrite into 'står på et ku-vort[e]' ('stands on a cow-wart') = me balancing on a 'cow-wart' when trying to get in the window (the sill was about breast level compared with my own body height) with my bottom writhing towards the camera = by 4) a "Special pleading and art in 'Middlemarch': The relations between the sexes. By Lloyd Fernando", could be for the suggestion 'foyd llernando' = 'få Hitler n Ando' = 'let me have Adolf Hitler', as the camera viewers could have interpreted the writhing anus - the very 'Sprachgitter' ('sprechen Sie deutsch' or 'Foltern-Ende'?) - to herald. This 'relation of the sexes' could then be about 'John Pikoulis' (Oct 1971) and the turning of the gender for a 'bil klinten' interpretation. What was (by 7) the first italian translations of 'shot'? The very 'ambrose'? Here it could be about making an identity of my genetics with the chemicals in the syringe of Dr.Verboten, the very 'Ronk Brine Röver' of 1968.

The spooned author names comes out (suggestions on weak basis) like 1) lick-hard bottom, 2) looks like my sister (my genetics), 3) mighty Verger-doc (dr.Gröver verboten), 4) fo Hitler Adolf, 5) bunny fucked of Nov[o]?, 6) Noam Chomskon?, 7) Airy E.Mambrose, 8) wejarey(?) = returning, 9) still is a bit hop, 10) was a friday?, 11) stands on a cow-wart, 12) blue master (Fumiani?) or teacher went humour. Looks like a hit-list? Or rather it could be a summary of a quick hop out the window, up to the bush at the corner of the house, which could mean outside the reach of the camera, and back again, and to get in the window there it is a bit of a hop since it is a little high, a grip on the window frame, etc. (Do these authors really exist?)

The mirror symmetry adds to these 'spoon' symbolisms, which means that there is the 'fox-trap' walking ad of the 'fart' of MLR April 1957. In short, the Bloody Sunday of 30 January 1972 seems via MLR Oct 1971 and Jan 1972 to have been prepared and provoked by the british administration for installing the identity of my genetics developing in Norway with british bullets in Ireland and for dumping the blame for this 'genetic fart' on me, for example as if my genetics were verboten chemicals.

Article 11 starts as follows, apparently the background of Celan's symbolism in 'Der Meridian' (shortly after his return from Odda, as seems to have been the case) of me as the Gedicht and Gröver/'Mengele' as 'die Kunst': "In Der Meridian, the speech delivered when he was awarded the Georg Büchner Preis, Paul Celan presented his audience with a view of the modern poem as an entity tenuously suspended at the edge of silence. He observes in an often quoted passaged: 'Gewiß, das Gedicht - das Gedicht heute - zeigt ... eine starke Neigung zum Verstummen. / Es behauptet sich ... am Rande seiner selbst; es ruft und holt sich, um bestehen zu können, unausgesetzt aus seinem Schon-nicht-mehr in sein Immer-noch zurück'. Poetic language, in this view, has become a rescueing device, a mode of speech barely audible and yet of sufficient intensity to wrench the poem back from the verge of its self-abolition in the realm of silence".

There seems to be some interests in this story of assigning to me an ejaculation of sperm at the end or corner of the house whereto I had walked 'stark naked', as suggests this quote, plus some emission of 'barely audible' gases in the behind in the process of climbing in. The 'deutsch' quote from Celan could even be a brief summary of the spooned forms of the author name in this issue of MLR. Should this 'deutsch' quote with its cruel attacks on 'Dr.Verboten' be telling of why Celan was murdered in 1970?

The question is whether the articles are pure scholarly-looking nonsense and whether the authors really exist and so forth. It makes serious science difficult if such writings has been going on for 100 years of pure nonsense presented as the peak of british scholarship. Could be some of the authors exist, though, I don't know. Could be the periodical boils down to nothing but pure terror propaganda. I recall some political talk in Norway a couple of decades ago or so of the 'archetypal politician' being called 'Svadabö' - that could perhaps even have been a hint about this periodical. It could be that sort of publication which could classify as 'verboten'. It could, nevertheless, have been a basis for Clinton in USA 1993-2001, in extension from the Bloody Sunday in Ireland in 1972, which seems to have been arranged by England in the direct extension from Hitler's 'Stutthof' camp for making a graphic identity between the names of Israel and England via Iceland and Ireland. The Dead Sea Scrolls from 1947 seems from MLR to have been british fraud and then it is likely to be about the status of hebrew/israeli scholarship compared with the icelandic sagas.

MLR July 1939: Stutthof concentration camp as a british project

1. The Munich 'Brut' and the 'Estoire des Bretuns'. By Alexander Bell
2. 'Gorbuduc' and the theory of tyrannicide. By Sara Ruth Watson
3. Ben Johnson and the devil tavern. By Percy Simpson
4. The influence of Byron on Emily Bronte. By Helen Brown
5. Corneille's 'Horace' and the interpretation of french classical drama. By W.Moore
6. Some upublished letters from the correspondence of Johann Elias Schlegel. By Elizabeth M. Wilkinson

The reference to the opening of Stutthof concentration camp on 2 September 1939 is quite impressive, not the least in terms of the one and only literary source in the Oslo Report from late 1939 to 'Bell'. The idea should likely be the erection into own mouth, which requires some lenght, but which, if successfully carried through, leaves suicide as the option for the britons if they want to imitate it with bullets. Then the own mouth is the bride. In order to avoid this, the britons may have ordered the establishment of the Stutthof concentration camp, for the meaning 'stutt' = 'short' and 'hof' for the genital. Title 2 must mean that the theory goes in the cloth and not in the mouth, in title 3 that it is 'John Jensen' (or his bone) who is in the devil's tavern, not his son (me!), in title 4 the emily grunter is a by-runner, in 5 there seems to be a traditional coitus and in 6 one gives up the project of the 'Schlegel' as a futile game. In short, a series of failed attempts to ejaculate into own mouth - which in sum means 'Stutthof' in the sense of inability to reach the mouth with own erection and thereby the british suicide could be avoided. This means that MLR July 1939 is a british responsibility claim on the opening of Stutthof concentration camp which seems to have been the purpose with the 'Bloody Sunday' in 1972. This means that me as the representative of the jewish-genetic diaspora was a project which was started at least in 1939. One should guess that it was started with the periodical in 1905-1906 or even earlier.

It could be that a study with serious analyses of the 100 years of MLR from the viewpoint of considering it a potential support to and responsibility claim for british state terrorism could be an important contribution to the revitalizing of science and scholarhip after the nazi period. Modern academic science and scholarship are in a pitiful and critical state indeed and one should not let it collapse entirely under the burden of this deplorable british national death cult. It is particularly deplorable if modern science networks are constructed (from research councils etc) as support media for terrorism and responsibility claims for it in order to construct an impenetrable wall between research and knowledge on the one hand and the secrets of power on the other. What can I expect after 14 years of work which substantially should have brought the world forwards? Clearly if power is threatened by knowledge it will try and construct a wall (Nelly Sachs' father is known for having constructed the 'bullworker' training apparatus) against it, such as the MLR periodical could be a tough example of.

The cases of MLR which I have studied here suggest that the strategy is the one of being reliable and exact and precise on future events, typically terrorism planned in advance, and uncertain on events in the past: For example, one probably cannot take MLR as certain evidence that the head of my penis was replaced in 1982 or that somebody exchanged 'cigar' with somebody else or that Mengele murdered Jensen if these are events of the past relative to the publication of the journal. But one can apparently take the journal as historically certain about events in the future. This could be telling of a british 'bordereau' logic for 'turning the time'. (How ridiculous can it get?). This turn could furthermore be related to the swap of bread and wine which could be the anglican self-understanding: The 'bread' is the penis which the child is 'drinking' in the 'upbringing', while the 'wine' is the death of a part of the genetic species which makes for the cannibalist parametre when the irreversability of death which means the past amounts to the irreversability of the metabolism - and hence the swap of bread and wine is the typical logic that you cannot clearly see the difference between bread and wine as soon as they have entered the intestines where the metabolism is going on: There bread is rather fluid and wine can pack to small crumbs when it mixes with e.g. hard-dry rusk ('kavring') for 'panierung', french fries etc. The swap in the sense of 'wed and/in brine' could be the background of my 'Bjarne' name and that could be a part of the background of my 'unsuccessfulness' and low profit from my work. The swap - of typical british kind - could have been planned to swap the gingersnap of Malvasia Vecchia with the ceiling of San Pantalon in Venice. One could perhaps also spot a 'swap' in MLR in the sense of being a prestigious philological periodical filled with what could be completely pure nonsense written by more or less fictive biographies, the peaceful 'read-action' serving terror in the humanities. The periodical - as some of the examples I have discussed show - could serve to represent the concept of 'fart og spenning' as the link between people in the jewish-genetic diaspora, and if this link is the 'og' = the copula 'and', it could be the AND which subtracts from Icel-AND and Irel-AND for the Isr-AEL-AND identity with England. The strong correlation with terrorism suggests that the periodical is a secret service program. 'Isr-AEL-AND' could be telling of the idea that the periodical could have been a part of the Stutthof nazi concentration camp in Poland - or rather vice versa - for the construction of an identity with the spelling of England.

If this swapping tradition also is the reason why people do not protest more loudly against the british state program with its state-controlled death cult, then it is time to realize what it is. 'Shit-irb' is the right word for the anglican 'Brie'-Tisch if they are planning to serve 'Jew-cheese'. Doesn't this really mean that british initiatives should go backwards - if their policy is that right is wrong and vice versa? The L-shape of Venice suggests that when 'stumpen' (the obtuse angle) is not right, then it is not wrong either - in fact it is right from a 'philosophical' and quasi-poetic viewpoint. But that does not mean that 'shitirb' terror policy is right because it is wrong - it only means that the britons have not understood the poetic logic. Himmler over the door of San Pantalon is not right. Nor will there be any space travel from that british way of 'turning time'.

All over the world there is surveillance data on people collected for electronic processing. That is when it is easy to model the historic consciousness as an electronic state and prevent the people from understanding these simple british mechanisms - and it may come to be too late.

I had nearly 25000 euros in December 2002 and when I came to Venice in 2008 my economic resources were very low after the move out of Ehamgasse had cost me some thousands - I could just keep it above zero for some days' time - in spite of my low consumption. I do not have a home. The money has been squeezed out of me for this disgusting british project. Somebody should repay me the money. The world should not accept such disastrous politics - and do not blame me for it.

Beslan, Jakarta bomb, Ehamgasse

MLR July 2004

1. Fanny's gaze and the construction of feminine space in Mansfield Park. By A. Despotopoulou
2. Anthropomorphism and other figures of speech in James Joyce's Ulysses. By S.Joseph
3. Cynic shamelessness in late sixteenth-century french texts. By H. Roberts
4. Bodily detours: Sarah Kofman's narratives of childhood trauma. By K.Robson
5. Decorum and indecorum in the seconda redazione of Baldassare Castiglione's Libro del Cortegiano. By A.Paternoster
6. Transition relevance places and overlapping in (Spanish-English) Conversational etiquette. By J.A.G.Ardila
7. A cinema of contradiction: Picazo's La tía Tula (1964) and the Nuevo cine Espanol. By S.Faulkner
8. Heine's Aristophanes complex and the ambivalence of Deutschland: Ein Wintermärchen. By D.Pugh
9. Rilke and the modern portrait. By H.Bridge
10. From Chudak to Mudak: Village prose and the absurdist ethics of Evgenii Popov. By J.Morris
11. Mouseion: The counter-institutional agent of the literary utopias of Ricardo Piglia and Dimitris Kalokyris. By E.Kefala

It is the Jakarta bomb on 9 September 2004 on the background of the author name J.A.G.Ardila of the mid title 6 which makes it relevant to read this as being about the Beslan school massacre of 1 September. The analysis shows that it may be about me moving into Ehamgasse 23 at the turn of the year 2004-2005, right across the street relative to 'Hörbiger' - a name which feature-converts to 'Akhilleus': This 'a kill-lefs[e]' could be a reference to the 'Veslan-s-lefs[e]' which PESJ used to serve in the eighties when we played Mah Yong in his home. Hence the school hostaging in Beslan in North Ossetia 1 September seems to have served to index this Veslan-slefse from the eighties - in which case it consequently means Ehamgasse 23. In July/September 2004 I lived in a short-term rent in Vienna waiting for a flat via Wien Wohnservice. I analyse on background of a story from Bern 2003 - I tried to rent a flat on short term (4 weeks, I think it was) but gave up after only one or two days. This theme could be telling of a british interpretation of my stay in Bern being so brief that it was only the 'head' of the period I had paid for - as if that should be telling of a replaced penis head since 1982 for the complex in MLR October 2004. This comes in addition to the name of the Bern room-letter's name 'Fanny B.' which sounds something like 'strange bread'.

The theme seems to be the poet on the run - Odysseus travelling around in Europe searching for a place to live, and finally he has come to Vienna half a year before he can move into Ehamgasse. I had appointed in probably early June a room from 1 July and moved down from Berlin. Along the Odyssey, I had been in Bern in 2003 and tried to live there for some time. I rented a room for a month from a 'Fanny' but had to give up after a day or two since there were some difficulties with permission - I had moved in and spent a night in the student town room when I found a notice under the door before noon that we had to go and apply for permission from the administration. I recall a sudden decorative gauze 'Kranz' (a 'Diels-Kranz'? There is also the source book of Proll - is that the same 'Aufbau' as Nelly Sachs' cousin was running, the jewish publisher?) in the shower which I could not remember from earlier in the day. It would not really have been suitable as 'wellington' or 'Hülse' for the 'strange bread' - such as a 'counter-institutional' agent of title 11 - but it could perhaps have been a 'funny' hint or something like that. Perhaps one could fancy a 'feminine space' by way of such a 'Kranz' of gauze? There was a man sitting on a 'bridgy' metal fence outside the window for a long time with his back towards the window - he had a skin-coloured T-shirt which could look like the rider in the 'pulley' corner of San Pantalon. I left for another city before I was turned into a 'desperate' condition, and lost the one month houserent plus the investment in a season travel card in Bern. It was a little too early to give up, though, because I had found the place by way of a paper notice hung up in a student environment and it had a 'chance-feel' about it (title 1, 10) which made it unlikely that it was made for me in advance. I had bought a ticket from Paris to Zürich and hopped off in Bern, put the luggage in a locker and went for a stroll to see if I could find a way to rent a place. I came across a university building with an information board at the canteen with some paper announcements for short-term rent, sales of items and books etc. and there was a telephone number for a one month rent at the student town. There were not many of those but some. I may have made one failed attempt to call before I got through, which could have been the story if it were not totally coincidental or even a 'just-in-case' arrangement. Of course such a 'just-in-case' arrangement could have been around in several places (other information boards, newspapers) even before I left Paris but I did find it strange that it could have been there waiting for me. I had the chance to believe that this room in Bern could not have been a 'trap' for me and when even that did not work out where could I find a place to live? I don't think the room-letter was an agent, though, but of course she could have been questioned afterwards why I moved away so quickly. Only this 'Kranz' is strange if it is the one from the shower.

Title 10 - from Dröbak to Moveback = Horten? Arthur Hugh Clough was a friend of Charles Eliot Norton from Boston. The 'clough' = 'dröbak' and the Eliot Horten - there is a ferry going across the Oslo fjord from Dröbak to Horten there and this was a 'ferie' = 'holiday' occasion - the room-letter in Bern would be off for holiday for some weeks and would let out the room for the sake of the money. 'Ferry' = 'pulley' and 'tHorten' (cp. the 'anthropomorphism' of title 2 vs. the popov of title 10) could be the entrance wall of San Pantalon. The 'counter-institutional' agent could be a J.Sauceph, an 'adult' item for insertion behind (a 'cigar', that means)?

For title 8, D.Pugh spoons to P.Dugh = Petter while title 4 has author name spooning to R.Kobson = Jakobsen. There is the story from Dröbak early 80's of me kneeling in front of the toilet of SOH when I was there for a pee and he burst in seeing me there in the bodily detour of strange position - when it was about 'a rist of phanes' in order to avoid wetting his bathroom - and not really about worshipping of the toilet bowl. 'Strange bread'... The posture in front of the toilet could have resembled the one of 'Laila' on the mounds of the Old Town in Fredrikstad (some metres from SOH's later home) when I was 16 (title 3). She was not my 'mother' (title 9), and SOH later married or at least mated 'Birgitte R.' (same title 9) in Dröbak. I recall the article after the alleged 1993 death of foreign minister Johan Jörgen Holst on the grasshopper called 'the kneeler' - it could have been this stroy from Dröbak. What is missing from the name of PESJ = Petter Enok Skau Jakobsen (Eisenhower doctrine #7) living in Dröbak is then 'Enok Skau': These could be contained in A.Paternoster = Paater Noster = Petter Enost and S.Faulkner = F.Saulkner = F.Skaulner. PESJ's father resembled or had at least some associative links to Joseph Goebbels, cp. authors 2 and 1.

The mid name J.A.G.Ardila = 'jag är Diels' (Kranz) = 'I am Diels'. 'Transition relevance places and overlapping' = the ferry from Dröbak to Horten, and 'draw-back' could be to pull the 'overlapping' foreskin back. This could even be an allusion to the room-letter's name, which invoked associations to 'Wine and Bread'.

The Beslan school hostaging started on 1 September 2004 and on 8 September I got a chance to rent a flat via Wien Wohnservice: I could go and see a flat in 'Ottakringer Strasse 16' early next morning. I was there in the afternoon to take a look at the environments and it turned out that the house was under complete refurbishment - not a single window or door or wallpaper in the house - and would be finished only after another handful of months at least. Early next morning 9 September there was the 'Jakarta bomb' outside the Australian embassy - which after the bombing looked like the house in 'Ottakringer Strasse 16' at that time. This could be the contents in title 6 by 'J.A.G.Ardila' = 'Jakarta' bomb. Looks rather convincing. The U3 line goes from 'Ottakring' to 'Simmering'. ('Lefsekling' is a concept which could be of some relevance?) 'Velstand'-s-lefsa could then suggest 'Belsan'-s-lespa/lefsa, whether that be relevant or not. There is also the leader of the norwegian labour party at the end of the nineties called 'Jagland'.

We (normally four people) used in the eighties to play Mah Yong in PESJ's home and he served rolled-up 'Vestlandslefsa'. He once made the joke 'velstandslefsa'. These 'lefsa' sometimes attracted some attention and remarks probably due to his generosity. I think there was butter and maybe sugar or was it cinnemon ('A cinema of contradiction') on the flatness. Could be the rolling of the 'lefse' is contained in title 5.

'La tía Tula' - does this mean that the Venice-Vienna-Vilnius axis as an 'FFT transform' from time to 'colours' of the Turkey-Vienna-Paris black-sea-loop means a 'balkan' (authors titles 1,11) = 'baltan' (authors titles 2,10 for the concept of 'adult') war 100 years after 1912-13? 'Northern Latvia' could then be this 'North Ossetia'.

This means that when I was about to head for Vienna in May-June 2004, it was after a series of failed attempts to find a place to live in Europe and I was driven around apparently from intrigue to intrigue. It seems that the reason why I gave up in Bern could have been the theme of this MLR July 2004 - issued also well after the terror in Khobar on 31 May 2004 which was around the time when I decided to move from Berlin down to Vienna. Soon after I had registered as resident in Vienna, a polish man was found shot in a car in Kopal-gasse not so far from Ehamgasse. This means that the July 2004 issue in principle could have been composed around the time of the terror in Khobar - and it could have served to index the flat I got in Ehamgasse 23 - perhaps with some butter (it could be that it was the Putzfrau = cleaning maid with the 'buckets' = 'bötter' who left the 'Kranz' in the shower in Bern) and sugar and cinnemon on the flatness of the rolled-up 'Vestlandslefsa'. Could have been a variant of Simon Flem Devold's 'svelekaker'? This could have been the terrible school hostaging of 'Beslan' in North Ossetia on 1 September 2004, after I had registered in Vienna. The 'rolled-up' form could have been the answer to the mystery of the apparently naked back on the horse in the corner of San Pantalon - but where do those sleeves come from if the back is copper naked? Rolled-up? I think 'Rollon' is a mountain or hill at Aalesund and theme of Aron Eidsvig's poetry.

It seems that the key word for Ehamgasse could be this 'jöde-ost' = 'jew-cheese' modelled by the figure Ötzi who seems to have died at the end of a long deep tunnel of 5000 subjective years of suffering and disappointment by the human race who treated him like that at the end of his life while the firmness of his body disintegrated into a soft cheese-like substance of pure suffering. Brie-Tisch it could mean.

This sort of periodical cannot be permitted according to human standards. And even less by divine. It could be that 'Brie-Tisch' in this sense of it quite simply will have to be called 'verboten'.

I can add that the story from Bern could have invoked some associations to the story from the jardin in Paris.

Conclusion on MLR July 2004: It seems to index the Beslan school tragedy of 1 September and the Jakarta bomb of 9 September and it seems to based on some stories from Bern 2003 and Dröbak in the eighties and rolled-up 'lefse' which also can mean a pamphlet-type book[let]. The reference is then to 'strange bread' possibly in the sense of 'strange penis'. Then (see below) the question is whether the head of the penis was changed in 1982 - here it be about the Kefala of title 11 and the 'saucy adult' of titles 2/10, which also give the CH/M including 'Chouseion' (11) and 'Chansfield Park' (1), which along with Dröbak/Brödak etc lands 'Fannys gaze' on 'Beslan'. The 'Mah Yong' could be contained in 'Mansfield Park' by 'Yong Röver'. One notices also the name of the leader of the Chechen terrorist group Shamil Basayev which rewrites to Damil Vasayev (or 'Daniel, hva sa jeg'), cp. title 1 with construction of feminine space, which probably does not mean change of penis-head. 'Head of construction' could be about such 'Shamil Basayev' vs. 'Damil Vasayev'. According to the information on the web, the school in Beslan was one of 16 schools in the city. One notices the reference in the MI5 and MI6 divisions of british secret service to the 'hidden lines' 15-16 of the sonnet algorithm. With the CH/M of title 10, there is also the CHI5 and CHI6 which could be 'cheeze' and 'dzhid' = 'jewish'. Or even 'CHIB' for 'khleb' = 'bread'? The school was 'Comintern Ulitsa SNO', cp. 'come inside accident' and the idea of sperm ejaculated inside the 'labia' at the opening to a vagina, which could be about the opening of the door 'told' in the next issue October 2004. Gogol's story of 'NOS' is about a man who found a nose inside a bread, hence 'found in bread'. 'Interncom' = 'in tenkom' = 'in changing-mind' = 'Noam Chomsky', which then could mean 'Litsaul' for Ulitsa = the Avr-'Eham Gasse'. 'Tenk om' = 'what if', 'suppose that...', 'imagine' = conditional imaginative. Could be for the source or origin of ideas? There was a whale in the Thames = 'i Thamesen' when Rugova died. Which means that if origin of ideas is associated with 'Litsaul' = 'Litauen' via Vienna to Venice = Paris with lift to Rome/London, the origin of ideas are conceived of as the head of the penis inside the vagina. That is when the britons write their poetry with the penis. Which means that if the head of the penis inside the vagina is the crux of the story, the britons may identify origin of ideas with the origin of the penis-head. But what if the penis-head has been exchanged? A person will normally discover it if the 'old nose' has been replaced - although icelandic sagas still seem to be thought of as authentic. This is the world of britons. My poetry is not related to such fancy matters.

MLR October 2004

1. The 'myth of Gentillet' reconsidered: An aspect of elizabethan machiavellianism. By N.W.Bawcutt
2. Alexander Pope and Duke upon Duke: Satiric context, aims, and means. By Pat Rogers
3. Love, honour, and duty in James Thomson's Tancred and Sigismunda (1745). By Sandro Jung
4. The power of the gift: Desire and substitution in Daurel et Beton. By Finn E. Sinclair
5. France exposed: Madame Bovary and the exposition universelle. By Anne Green
6. Aldo Palazzeschi's :Riflessi or, writing as erasure. By Enrico Cesaretti
7. Rafael Alberti's 'Muerte y juicio': Death, judgement, and the poetry of (dis)belief. By Derek Gagen
8. Demystification and sacrificial thinking: Violence in Terenci Moix's Món Mascle. By Arthur J.Hughes
9. The traveller as Landschaftsmaler: Industrial labour and landscape aesthetics in Johanna Schopenhauer's travel writing. By Alison E.Martin
10. The erection of the Berlin wall: Thomas Brussig's Helden wie wir and the end of East Germany. By Brad Prager
11. Pechorin's demons: Representations of the demonic in Lermontov's A hero of our time. By W.J.Leatherbarrow

Paginated with roman numerals: Medieval literature and historical enquiry. By Derek Pearsall

While MLR July 2004 seems to have indexed the Ehamgasse which I was about to move into, the next October 2004 seems to have been about the political project therein. It happened in probably January or February 2005, some weeks after I had moved into flat #17, that the neighbour in #16 could not get her door open, and after I had listened to the struggling sounds for a while I opened my door and asked if I could help. She could not have the key turned around probably because the door was pressed too hard in the doorframe. I helped her turn the key which really was hard but it finally turned. I don't think the door opened while I was there but the lock did. Could be (if she did not give me a sufficiently unambiguous go-ahead for the turning of the key, and I think she was a little mute about it although she gave space for me to try) this could have been designed in advance as a way of calling it a 'formal burglary' - like the one on my computer in 1999 - by the logic that I 'broke in' = 'bröd mig in' = 'bread and wine' and maybe even 'bread urine in' (or 'in-urine' as for females = 'jente' - 'mig' is old norwegian for 'urine', according to Lönn) - cp. the idea of 'eddic poetry' - as for the 'rusk' = 'kavring' containing the wine in the belly for a swap of bread and wine at the threshold to the metabolism. I was standing on the spot where I later sometimes observed a child's pram.

Title 1 clearly is a possible allusion to this swap: "The myth of 'jente'-let" could be about the 'myth' that she allowed me to turn her key, or even the room-let in Bern. "The 'cheese of mental-et' reconsidered: An aspect of elizabethan machiavellianism" - suggests an aspect of elisabethian 'Malvasia-Vecchia' = an aspect of AIDSHIV (such as a 'rape of the lock' = Alexander Pope's title, cp. title 2), for this swap of bread and wine in Venice with San Pantalon. By B.W.Nawcutt = B.W.knockout. Why should the B double-you? Topple-you - as for Saddam Hussein in Iraq = Tiepolo on Zattere? Title 11 = 'bedrarins demon' = 'the demon of untruthfulness in marriage' = the demon of AIDSHIV which makes untruthfulness dangerous. Lennon-tovs = Lenin-silent = Inez Armand? But if the neighbour had a man, why did I break her ('leathern') door open with the turning of her key? Hence 1/11 could be about the idea of me breaking illegitimately in to the neighbour, wedging inbetween her and her husband, so to speak. As for a variant of the 'pedrasty' parametre?

Titles 2 and 10 clearly point to San Pantalon: Pope ('The rape of the lock') is on the lefthand side with a 'duke' (a cloth) over his 'duke', a theme which is interpreted in 10 as the 'erection' of the San Pantalon church (the 'Berlin wall' - a cigar inserted?) with the 'East Germany' = 'Ost Jewish' = 'jew-cheese', as seems to be the Brie-Tisch concept. The 'cigar' seems, though, to be held in the hand of 'runathand swift' on the other side of the church, hence a remote relation - as if separated by the walls between flats in a house. The Berlin wall, the intestine wall - the third eye. Which means that the church room of San Pantalon would be conceived of as the 'telepathy radio' between two rooms in a block of flats. Very interesting, this idea... Looks like a 'Brie-Tisch' attempt to interpret the themes of Talmud Erubin. Hence if 1/11 would be about me turning the key in the neighbour's door, this door could in 2/10 be seen as transposed onto the open room inside a flat. Since San Pantalon seems to be associated 'politically' with genocide, it could be that 2/10 is about this factor in nazi philosophy.

3. Love, honour, and duty in James Thomson's Tancred and Sigismunda (1745). By Sandro Jung = da vond-ordan lo til han Thames Jomson's (Donau Johnson? Donald Duck?) 'Sacred and ti-girs-motor' by Sandveien (1957) = Noam Chomsky's 'Sacred and ti-girs-motor' by Sandveien (1957) or even 'Sandviken Psychiatric Hospital' which represents the gingersnap of Venice. The 'ten gear's motor and sacred' is the 'Ferrari-Ward' university chair of Chomsky, with relevant relations to this idea of a 'chair of teaching' and even the name of the neighbour in Ehamgasse. Hence 'Mouton' (cp. 'mutton') publishers of Chomsky's 'Syntactic structures' at the time of my birth in 1957. The same publisher rejected my 'Submorphemic signification' after I in 1994 (or could it have been as early as 1993?) had sent it to their responsible of reviews, allegedly called 'Handwerker'. 'Vond-ordan' ('the bad words') = 'dort-Wohnen' = 'Wiener Wohnen', the alternative to Wien Wohnservice (but available to the public only after 2 years in Vienna and 1 year on waiting list). Then title 3 could be about the duty of moving away after the honour of love has been mutilated by the 'thumbs-on' of the 'home' - the intruding key-turner should move and not the one who had suffered the mutilation of my key-turning help. And how to move on? By Wiener Wohnen. I did not move on to Wiener Wohnen (for example to some 'Sandveien' in Vienna) but moved out of the country.

9. The traveller as Landschaftsmaler: Industrial labour and landscape aesthetics in Johanna Schopenhauer's travel writing. By Alison E.Martin. The traditional 'Mannskapet / Landskapet / Dansk ape' ('the crew / the landscape / danish ape') = 'MLD' = 'Modern Language Desearch'. Randskapet = the cupboard at the brim, edge, brink = Abstellraum - where the beetroot stain was on the wallpaper in my flat in Ehamgasse 23. 'Regnskapet' = the budget, the accountancy: In the year 2005 there was a mixmax in the distribution so that I in #17 got #16's annual report from ÖVW on my door and the ones above or next to me had got mine on theirs and people had to go down the stairs to the neighbours with the report. So I had to go down to #16 with it. At that time I believed that it was the same person living there as I had helped open the door (before the apparently new one later). Nobody home and I left it there and later (or even before) read the news on internet that a person in Iraq had been shot when s/he opened the door that day. Which could mean that if she had been home, one could later put two and two together for the conclusion that the story would have been that somebody died when I was on the door. Conclusion on 9: The gingersnap in Venice which is relating to Burma and MLR April 1947-1957-1967. 'Mannskapet / Landskapet / Regnskapet' = 'Modern Language Research'. 'An[d]n-skap-et' = 'odern-anguage-esearch'. Hence the Landschaftsmaler - which could mean Hitler before he was not let in to the academy of arts in Vienna? Why was Hitler filled with such a holy wrath that he attacked the whole world? Had he eaten something? A 'berserkir'? Don't blame me for Hitler's 'chopen-hauer' food (cp. 'muttonchop' whiskers). 'Dr.Skiva-god'? 'Et-skiv' = 'AIDSHIV'? There have been these ideas around that I was served a slice of bread with excrements mashed into the liver paste on it in Odda in the early sixties, and the memory of such a 'berserkir' story could of course have filled me with 'holy wrath', but I cannot say that I remember it and so I don't know why the ideas have been around. To eat excrements is not normal 'cannibalism' but maybe related somehow. Add-old feetler/feedler.

For summary of 3/9, I recall Gröver/'Mengele' telling me (I think while we were footwalking on 'Skaret') that cannibals prefer the ball of the thumb in the palm (could be he meant 'hand-i-ball'): Hence James Thomson's. This could be about the 'cannibalist' factor in nazi philosophy.

Which means that 1-2-3 and 9-10-11 could be about these three traditional factors in nazi philosophy - within an 'anglican' framework - installed into the Ehamgasse flat in advance, before I even had signed the contract and before I even had got the offer for the flat.

4. The power of the gift: Desire and substitution in Daurel et Beton. By Finn E. Sinclair 8. Demystification and sacrificial thinking: Violence in Terenci Moix's Món Mascle. By Arthur J.Hughes. The go[w]er of the pift: Sesire and dubstitution in Borland Diten. By Sinn Fein clair. I once in Bergen ordered a Borland C++ compiler from Oslo and it arrived with 'jokes' installed - some alien programs had been copied onto the CD with file dates 1 April. It could not be used and I could not trust it. I don't remember the details in the story but I went back to the seller in Bergen who had ordered it from Oslo but the seller could not repay me my money and I still have it. I think he offered to return it for a copy but maybe I did not care about it since it appeared to have been done in Oslo probably because they knew my name and then there was no purpose in a second attempt. I had moved away from Oslo and knew in advance when I had to put my name on the order in Bergen that it probably was a futile game. Which it seems to have been. (My novel 'The Dreamer' is about my last days in Oslo - before I moved to Bergen - and my social life was somewhat delimited to car numbers - could be that would have been a sort of 'distributional principle' in the life narrative a la Dante). 'Borland Driten' could be about this unfortunate CD disk or it could be a cigar bored into excrements = Bored on 'ground'. Gor den bra inn? Wed in brine? But it could also be about the title to my novel 'The Dreamer' read in 'british' style with handwritten russian 'm' for 't' = 'The Driter'. 'The driter jeg i' = 'I don't car[e]'. This would be the book abused for the bombings in Moscow and China and the attack on USA. As mentioned above, I do not believe that the tip of my penis was exchanged with e.g. some terrorist's in 1982, but it could perhaps have been about the concept of 'DITEN' and hence 'f-Ingrid Betancourt'. (There was a hairdresser - cp. 'Hörbiger' - a little up Grillgasse parallel to Dommesgasse called something with 'Pfiff'. There is also another hairdresser rather precisely mid way from this down to Simmeringer Hauptstrasse). Violence in Terenci Moix's = Milans in Firenze's Toixs = Borlands in Firenze's Gift = V/M/B = my 'End-Morgan Quartet' by a 'Borland Gift' (an alien virus program credited with the 'dacrificial' authorship by '©-mystification') as if abused for the 'darting' of 'Verboten' - and given to legal deposit in England? I do hope they can refrain from abusing my poetic work for such ugly purposes - but would that be realistic at all? Firenze is about mid way between Milano and Roma. Could be this would be about Dante as the distributional ('d[r]iten') principle in John Gower's ballades, same principles as in his Terza Rima and the sonnets - as I have described in my book "Time and the sonnet" which I sent to copyright registration in Washington in the summer 1999 along with 'Birds to Saladin'. This Dante factor could be what is recognized as the political factor of 'Chomsky' via Dickens/Thackeray. Hearter jewish?

Summary 4/8: The 'power of the gift' could be about the power of poison ('toix'), for example if Kurt Köck were murdered in 2007, and the 'power of the lift' in AIDSHIV (such as the virus on the CD) from Paris to London or from 'Malvasia Vecchia' to 'San Pantalon' in Venice. For the lift/gift, see also title 8 'vagine's in Terenci Moix' etc. (including the arrow's of Amor = 'Amor spiler' or 'Amoll-konserten' and perhaps even the pants of 'Anne Frank Stagbok') with the Arthur J. Hughes. This would be the lift which applies after the three parametres of nazism had applied in a Black Sea Loop.

5. rance fix posed: Ba dame movary and the uxposition eniverselle. By grannen (= the neighbour). Run's fix posed = the camera in fixed position outside the house on the Hörbiger factory across the street. Rands fick sposed - surveillance camera on intimate relations = ba dame movary and the uxposition eniverselle by grannen = asked the dame (Hoerbiger) to move the camera with referenec to the universal juxtaposition of neighbour' rights = asked Hörbiger to [re]move the camera so that it would not cover the area outside the house. Asked the dame to change intimate position to an 'uxposition eniverselle'. Run Swift posed: The bulletin held in the hand of the Swift-Göring character in San Pantalon. Or even asked the dame to move.

7. Afael rAlberti's 'You are two i mutuo': Death, judgement, and the poetry of (dis)belief. By Derek Gagen. Peth, touchment and the doetry of bis-delief. By Gerek Dagen = piss, touchment and two or three of beasty life. By entrance to the garden. Pizza oudrment (cp. the massacre on the pizza-party youngsters in Crandon in USA on 8 October 2007) = Picca Willanowitch - and two or three of beasty life = and 42.666% through my Hammerfest. 42.666 = 2/3 through a 'beasty' structure of 64 elements in a 4 x 16 matrix. It represents the 'diagonal' of a 64-element structure of 'sonnet algorithm' kind - symbolizing the 'dantean' origins for the role assigned to the chomsky factor via Dickens/Thackeray. The diagonal, it means, which also is the political interpretation of Josef Mengele in a Mengenlehre framework. Here are the lines which are exactly 42.666% through my poetry book 'Hammerfest', the first book in my TEQ and apparently subjected to abuse in US film-making:

People have a better
Picca Willanowitch than that!

And having retturned,
I will print what I kjøkken deceit,
but I don't want to.

This 1997 fragment is very precise to the names of the neighbours in 2005 - but I could of course not know about these names 8 years earlier. Unless some strange 'telepathy' had told me these names 8 years in advance, one should believe that the name rather were organized after my book than the other way round. At least one of them moved into the house after I had written and registered this book.

Afaelr Alberti's 'You are two i mutuo' = 'hva feiler albertis you are chewi mutual' = 'what is the matter with Kurt Köck?' - 'what is Kurt Köck suffering from?' Köck died from some abdominal cancer in 2007, could be by the 'power of the gift'. You are two in mutton/Mouton? You are too immune?

Which means that if titles 5 and 7 are systematically and mirror-symmetrically related, it means that the 42.666% of my book installed with the two neighbours are related to the immovable camera on neighbour Hörbiger across the street. It could mean that 'hear bigger' = the poetic muse of inspiration for my poetry such as 'Hammerfest' is - by a bordereau-british trick of 'turning time around' - the same as these neighbours in the house - which have been moved in there by administration on basis of my own poetry in the same 'Hammerfest'. But that could be intended to mean that the administration is the invisible 'missing link' in the poetic articulation, the very 'tweeter' of the poetry. And which administration is that? It could be the administration who thinks of itself as the distributional principle of Dante recognized in Chomsky's role - via Dickens/Thackeray. 'Noam Avram Chomsky' could the be read 'Noam Avr-Eham Chomsky'.

Hence 5/7 = the role of administration by dante-terza-rima structure.

Clearly if two agents are to swap 'tweeting' cigars - emptying the bottom like a 'frau Lessior' - it is difficult to accomplish that with any sort of certainty unless the one who is going to have it from the other stands there watching the moment when it guiches out and grabs it with own hand in the very selfsame moment - otherwise there can be the danger of fraud by replacement. (The problem is related to that of being certain that sperm originates from a particular person). And vice versa for the other one - and then it is just to stuff it in again in the new colon after having inspected the contents of it: Are you chimpsky? No I'm chomsky - with Ferrari-Ward MIT chair = am I tit rear = am I Tony Blair = Gordon Brown's takeover = british responsibility claim to the 'pulley' corner of San Pantalon for the IBAN and BIC AFFE axis. As if Blair and Brown swapped 'cigars' by the power takeover which would correspond to two agents swapping cigars in the 'cabinet' - and hence no real change of power except in the sense of swapped cigars has taken place by this 'changing of cigar' = 'changing of the Gard' = V-um = V-2, the rocket made in Dora concentration camp. Could it be about Möser and Mohnke swapping roles = 'Vil helr Ronke' for 'Vilhelm Mohnke' = M-L-R? When IBAN or IVAN = 'm-öser' = 'bails-out' = 'vil helr ronke' and BIG AFFE = 'Vilhelm Mohnke', there is the pulley-door-axis at the door of San Pantalon contained in these two names from Hitler's administration - and I think the two men were sufficiently similar to allow even for the idea that they could have been the same man (although they probably were not). They also share similarities with the 'tweeter' role on Falchaasen and with the 'Olsen' on Gressvik, if my memory of Olsen is not too far off. But that could mean that if 'tveeter-aas' (the 'cigar' in the 'aas' telling stories by the swap) also is the 'inspiring' (?) homunculus over the door of San Pantalon, next to 'Heinrich Himmler' (and isn't there a T-shirt around for the concept of 'Abercrombie & Fitch'?), this could be about moving the 'tweeter' role - of 'poetic inspiration' - from one person to another (Olsen-Fjellheim?). But if that 'poetic inspiration' is the hidden role of the administration when it put the two neighbours into the house, it could be about an attempt from british administration to take over the role of the poetic inspiration of my poetry by playing on metaphors of an exchanged penis-head: "A gentle knight was pricking on the plaine" (Spenser first canto) for 'a gentle knight was playing on the prick' as in titles 1/11. And then an alleged swap of head of penis in 1982 (which is doubtful) could have been the theme of this change of prime minister in England - although the real theme could have been an exchange of cigars among two agents for representing the IBAN and BIC AFFE in San Pantalon.

This seems to be the project of Ehamgasse 23, according to MLR. One notices that this 'changing of the guard' by swapping cigars could be about this homunculus tweeter (the 'cigar'?) which exhibits in small form the bigger form of the Göring/Swift character in a diagonal which seems to the contents of Thomas Traherne's poetry such as it is found in two manuscripts - one belonging to himself and one left after his brother Philip. This double source could be the contents of the Traherne project - since it means that the poetry found after the two brothers were in fact all of it written by one and the same person (Thomas) and hence no real change had taken place. This adds to the theory that Traherne may be fraud. And it could suggest 'steady course' and no change in foreign terrorist policy after Blair according to MLR.

In short, titles 1-2-3 (and mirror titles) = nazi parametres for Black Sea Loop, 4/8 = AIDSHIV lift Paris-London, 5/7 = the distributional sonnet algorithm principle of dante/chomskyan kind = the US-European connection of Dickens/Thackeray, while 6 = the Mengenlehre diagonal replacement as the tweeting administrative inspiration to the poetry, a sort of 'Mengele-wolf in sheeps clothing' in the 'keys to heaven'. This would mean the british government as a diagonal for the house-space telepathy through the walls diagonally replaced with the open church-room in San Pantalon which maps onto the gingersnap of Malvasia Vecchia representing the 'L-K-hold' of the traditions of british poetry as a mystery developed from the anglican reformation as well as the talmudic basis for the Rwanda genocide. Which is when the dantean distributional principles of poetic form holds the keys to the links - and that could be Chomsky's role in the history as assigned to him in advance (Chelmno etc). All this is of course only because of a lack of understanding of poetic logic - and as soon as one has understood the relations of these programs to poetic logic, it collapses like a house of cards belonging to the previous millenium. It is not the future. 'Bleier' = 'diapers', as if one secret agent has 'tested' the cigar before the cabinet meeting and hence s/he could need diapers in the underpants, diapers showing traces not only of normal intestine matter or fluids but even blood from the couterhooks of the cigar torn off - cp. 'Tårnåsen' - while the other one is more safe and has not yet been out of the colon before the cabinet meeting and is only 'brown'. 'It is the authentic cigar, I hope? Why so bloody?' Haemorrhoids... Could this really be the contents of the Blair-Brown takeover - symbolized in this mirror structure of October 2004 and contained in title 6? It is this sort of philosophical-political logic - far from the days of Kant and Hegel - which seems to be at the heart of the european culture which got a serious blow with nazism.

Beslan was a bad story. Is it the plan to continue in the same way? Steady course?

The article paginated by roman numerals (probably at the end of the October 2004 issue) is 'Medieval literature and historical enquiry. By Derek Pearsall' and could be an allusion to the death of Kurt Köck - a criminal investigation by 'Derrick Hagen' or 'Derrick Parnell' = 'Thomas Parnell' (Dommesgasse) = 'Thomas Traherne'. 'Dinner literature and hysteric inquiry by the inspector of the pear'.

Title 10 contains a heroic 'Thomas Brussig' holding something at the end, could be a 'broad preger'.

Which seems to be the program of Ehamgasse 23, possibly a sort of Visthouse 100 years later.

If this swap of cigars is meant to be a swap of communion bread and wine, also for the 'wed-in-brine' = 'Gordon Brown', it could mean the british anglican death cult program with steady course. Which even could be the horrible concept of 'steady-course death' - the prolonged death of 'verboten'. And after heavy MLR-indexed terrorism under Blair, Ehamgasse seems to have meant a swap to Brown, apparently for a 'change' of politics, although nevertheless apparently under the banner of 'steady course'.

The 'tweeter' axis is likely to represent the 'chomskyan' distribution of Dante - for an expansion of the british death cult program to USA (cp. Manhattan 2001). If it really be about 'MLR' = 'MellR', as the new version of '8ell4' (one notices also a role of 'chiropractor' = 'Mon Mascle' and the name of Mohnke), and if Ehamgasse be about this cigar swap in the cabinet symbolized by Blair/Brown, then it suddenly appears as if this story with the mysteries of the (in advance) wellinformed MLR is simply solved and that's it: Then MLR is published by the british PM's office! Ah, I suddenly understand. That explains this AIDSHIV and Beslan and Manhattan and Moscow and Hebei and all that: It's the british government. The prime minister's office in close collaboration with (as a sort of 'cigar' for) the secret services. That adds meaning to e.g. MLR October 1923.

In sum: This is about a change of authority, modelled in change or 'chains' of PM and change/'chain' of 'cigar'. A link. Homunculus-Swift diagonal in San Pantalon. The link is contained in the 'MellR' = 'MLR' as an apparently governmental program modelling the link between me and possibly a genetic relation of origin seemingly among the people of Ireland, or simply the jewish-genetic diaspora represented by me = the people of Iceland/Israel. (It seems that 'Vilhelr Ronke' could be the link in terms of 'Vilhelm Mohnke', in which case it could be that Fjellheim is the theme). The interest could be modelled in an alleged night-walk of mine in 1971 from the window up to the corner of the house and back again, before the 'Bloody Sunday' in Ireland (cp. also the 'bloody cigar'), with the recurring theme that I should have masturbated on the corner with a clot of sperm 'been laden' on a green leaf there before I went back again. The clot would then have been in the mid point like the 'fart' of the 'walking ad' represented in MLR April 1957. 'Corbet Stewart's article in MLR January 1972 quotes Celan, as if he were an agent writing behind concealed interests: "ein grünes / Schweigen, ein Kelchblatt, es / hing ein Gedanke an Pflanzliches dran-/grün" and Stewart concludes on the 'Schweigen' which seems to be me: "Here too the silence is presented in terms of vegetative imagery". It seems that this is a widespread theme - that my authorship is contained in this clot of sperm on the corner of the house in 1971. But such a clot is unknown to me and hence in a few years time, or a few decades time, it is suddenly discovered that I had not left any clot there at all! He had left no clot, only a fart! That could be entirely true, of course, although the philosophy is not on the level of what Kant or Hegel once was. It wasn't his authorship? No that is something else. That is typical nazi style of fraud and mythology. It may be that somebody else was up there and left a clot in the early seventies, I don't know, but it is totally uninteresting for my authorship. While the Bloody Sunday issue of January 1972 seems to have focussed all it has of concentrated mythological force on this ejaculated sperm in the mid point of the series of articles - as for representing my genetics as what the british bullets represented on that Bloody Sunday. Could be the future 'discovery' is meant to imply that somebody else wrote my authorship. I can assert that it was I (and not for example Fjellheim or some agent for the british government) who wrote my works. Or the story could have been about an initial assumption that I represent the jewish-genetic diaspora by being the child of Sachs/Celan and then suddenly it is discovered that it wasn't my genetics at all - it was somebody else's - in which case the originally assumed links between me in Ehamgasse and the jewish-genetic diaspora in the Black Sea Loop district could have been disrupted and concealed as an administrative secret - for example for the identification of the jewish-genetic diaspora as 'Satan' - in an anglican framework.

The changing of 'cigars' in the cabinet (in 2006, I think it was) would in 2004 have been in the future and thereby certain knowledge for MLR and a hypothetical swap of penis-head in 1982 would have been in the past and thereby uncertain - for the borderau logic of turning of the time. If the story should have been about the contents of the penis-head = (norw.) 'kukkhue' = 'cuckoo', then it could also have been about the contents of the head in the psychiatric hospital, such as in Sandviken Psychiatric Hospital = the venetian gingersnap. My authority is mine, though, and nobody else's. If MLR July 2004 is about Bern and the short stay there, it could be that the real interest of the british government when they swapped head of government is in the theory of a swapped head of my penis in 1982. I do not believe that that is what happened, but if it should have happened, and if it were the head of a secret agent who was put in the place of mine, it could have put the british government in the position of claiming that I - which then means the head of the penis - was a secret agent for them. Could be the penis-head even has a bank account in Switzerland and spies for the british government. All this is unknown to me, though, and I do not believe that it was changed. Nor does it make any difference - I suppose the penis-head must count as mine today in any case and it is totally uninteresting for the question of authorship to my writings.

An accusation that I had been replaced by a near-identical copy would be no small matter, though: Such allegations seem to have been around in 1923 for Lenin, as for a pretext for murdering him on basis of the idea that it wasn't him but a ruthless agent who had taken his place.

There was a Ragna Eidsvig living in Bern: I met her in the sixties in Fjellgata in Klipra. She had the same name as Ragna Eidsvig Gröver but was of a smaller 'stature'. She was then going to Bern.

This seems to be a tragic and terribly uninteresting administrative logic of scrabble type for cheating people to believe something in order to make it possible to spread as much death and suffering as possible on the continent and elsewhere in the world - for the purpose of the 'anglican wellness'. The world should not accept this sort of politics. The britons can find some other religion if they cannot do it without murder. A death cult is not a religion. There cannot be any sort of justification for this type of tragic 'bordereau' administration which so much destroys the quality of human life and culture, in particular if it is supposed to be the foundations of a british EU. There is every good reason to start a thorough investigation of the story and publish all details in a 'trial' format.

Tiebriesch and EU's Rat: The britons or at least british logic seem to be a problem but how do the world solve it? If the britons are sufficiently fanatic, to bomb the island under the sea could only release british chemicals and viruses enough to erase the human species. So, could be the logic, it is better to choose the soft way and gradually subdue them by assimilation into EU. But that could be precisely their own plan - a gradual takeover of the power of EU to make it a british kingdom with colonies in USA. Could be some 104 years in isolation on the island would be better, though: Brie-Tisch verboten. If I contact former friends of Sachs or Celan by phone, they seem to get in a hurry with putting the receiver on - probably because they remember the fate of my genetic parents after they had been in contact with me. Well but that should not be about me - it should be about the britons! Hence, if you are contacted by a briton on the phone or in the street within the next 104 years, you could hurry up and put the receiver on or go around the person in the street - otherwise you never know what can come to happen to you. I am not the problem - it is the british program signified with the MLR which is the problem. Remember what happened with the schoolchildren in Beslan, for example, or the theatre visitors in Moscow. They probably still had illusions about the britons and look at that terrible fate they suffered. I am not a representative of those islanders. The people of Island.

It is very urgent with getting european culture up and going again. For the time being it seems to be not only lying on the ground but possibly even under. All this mysticism of parametres and diagonals on house-space and gingersnap and all this is only a lot of theatre illusions for a shadow theatre for pretending that there is a reason for all this: There is no other reason than the blood-thirst of the british death cult which needs quasi 'goodenough reasons' for their mass murders. That is what must be stopped. One should not accept such policy as valid policy or the death cult basis for it as valid religion.

The british-built Visthouse seems to have been the beginning of the holocaust and world wars of the 20th century. If Ehamgasse 23 is planned to be a Visthouse for the 21st century, there is every good reason to stop the british projects now.

Auschwitz - is 'Ehamgasse 23' a new 'Visthouse', 100 years after the first?

The order to establish Auschwitz was given by Heinrich Himmler in April 1940. The responsibility claim to this order is found in MLR Jan 1940:

1. The literary background of Francis Bacon's essay 'Of death'. By Marjorie Walters
2. The mouse-trap - a postscript. By W.W.Greg
3. 'Volpone' and the reputation of venetian justice. By Richard H.Perkinson
4. The evolution of Racine's 'Poetique'. By R.C.Knight
5. Archery and Chivalry: A noble prejudice. By A.T.Hatto

This very clearly indexed 'Auschwitz' as a rewrite of 'Visthouse'. The story goes that the first british owner lord Guy Freemantle, who had built the house around 1907 or even by the start of MLR in 1906, was waiting for his ethereal young wife to come over from England to see it but she died before she could reach the place. Could be the 'literary background' of the death? She switsched aus by force majeure? Quite simply a euphemism for an ejaculation? Guy Freemantle sold the house after her death to William Lawson - and the names of these two first owners butterfly to Guy Lawson = the key in the lock and William Freemantle = the opening door.

1. 'Of death' is 'to switsch aus' = the young wife, the genetics
2. Mouse-trap = ouse-mpatr = Auschwitz
3. 'Volpone' = 'William' and 'the reputation of venetian justice' = 'Freemantle'
4. 'he wa lus on fa sins söte kvinne' = 'han var lus po far sins söte kvinne' = 'he was louse on his father's sweet woman' = 'AIDSHIV' = the butterfly lift over the waterway (the canal) from Paris to London, hence 'Guy Lawson'
5. Chiv-Arch = Vich-arch = Vist-house, the opening door, the gates (keys) to heaven

In 4) one can also read backwards (= literary background), for example 'tian ic a kit eo sen ica f noisulov eh' = 'time is a Guy Lawson - is of noise you love', hence the time domain of an FFT or Fourier transform - leading by butterflies onto the 'keys to heaven'. Old news! My original intuition when I found these 'keys to heaven' was that the expression somehow could be related to the name of 'Keith Abercrombie', an intuition which thereby turns out to be a mistake: It rather seems to have its origin here in the 5-step construction.

These 5 steps could perhaps be recognized in the five elements of Ehamgasse in MLR October 2004, up to element 6.

Why haven't the other countries' administrations told the public about these british projects? It really should not be permitted to keep such things on secret administrative level. The reason could be the trivial one that neither Kant nor Hegel work in the secret services and therefore the people in the services have not the chance to understand what this really is and how much damage it does to the culture when it spreads in 'international secret service', while people go around having full confidence in their own national secret services. But that is precisely why it could be urgently important that the details of such administrative programs for the future be published. There may be people today who can still understand what the culture should have been, but it is not so certain that they exist in the future if the british war against the intellectuals be permitted to continue.

Aktion Reinhard: Treblinka, Belcez, Sobibor

The 'Aktion' included the establishing of the death camps Treblinka, Sobibor and Belzec, representing the three nazi parametres of genocide, pederasty and cannibalism. It was Reinhard Heydrich's name which seems to have been the background of the name of the three death camps, but there are reasons to believe that 'Reinhard Aktion' really means 'Ragna Eidsvig', my official custody mother born in 1929, could be even for the construction of the 'frau Röver' ('frau Lessior'?) construction from Söder. The three death camps existed only for a few months and claimed some 1,8 million lives. The british responsibility claims for them seem to have been presented in three first issues of MLR 1941.

Treblinka: The story of Auschwitz and MLR seems to be that when Himmler gave the order in April 1940 to make the camp, the responsibility claim to this was already given in MLR January 1940 - which then probably means that the order from London was given between January and March to Himmler and he subsequently forwarded the order in Hitler's administration in April. MLR January 1940 therefore serves as a british responsibility claim on Auschwitz by way of the ORDER from London to Berlin. Treblinka seems to have a comparable story. There were hundreds of concentration camps and clearly not all of these could have been in the MLR, but the main death camps would likely have been. Treblinka took some 7-800.000 of the 6 million jewish lives. It was, according to Schwarz, opened on 1 June 1942, and the plans for the construction of it seem to have been taking shape from the autumn 1941. Schwarz tells that the area was determined in the autumn 1941 and in the district there had been a 'Strafarbeitslager' in the summer 1941. The british order to make Treblinka as a death camp is therefore likely to be represented in MLR July 1941.

1. The Elizabethan translation of the 'Questioni d'Amore' in the 'Filocolo'. By Herbert Wright
2. The Caroline audience. By Clifford Leech
3. The Dunciad. By Gilbert Highet
4. Staging 'Le Jeu de la Feuillée'. By Thomas Walton
5. A coronation service 1414. By Inez Macdonald
6. On the origins of the liturgical drama of the middle ages. By R.Pascal

1 = a trouble-link of the 'blinker' (Amors arrows)
2 = a treble in car
3 = Treblinka ('The Dunciad' = Alexander Pope's title)
4 = tree-blinker - the play of reflections of light in the leaves on a tree in the forest
5 = a car on [n]asian service = trouble in car
6 = the tradition of marking a tree for being cut down by the forester's cut with his axe in the bark = jump jarnegg grover

More than enough for the assertion that Treblinka is encoded in MLR June 1941 - which is when the plans for making it was taking shape. It seems from Schwarz that the order from London could have come in the summer 1941 and the district determined in the course of a few weeks or months and the camp was ready ffor use on June 1942 which was one year exactly after MLR June 1942.

Belzec is the death camp which seems to repesent cannibalism. It which was built from 1 November 1941 to February 1942. The first gasings started in the middle of March and lasted untill the end of November 1942. The camp was only 265 x 275 metres - very small that means. In the course of these 8-9 months of 1942, 600.000 people were gased to death. That means more than 2000 new people every day into that little area, which again means that the 'camp' was only a sort of transit region for people coming in alive in the one end and were poured out dead in the other - more than 2000 every day. That is a 'death camp' - it is likely to have represented the intestines through which the 'genetic food' was processed in metabolism. When the building of the 'camp' started in November 1941, it is likely that MLR January 1941 could have been the british responsibility claim:

1. Geoffrey Chaucer, J.P. and M.P. By Margaret Galway
2. 'The Faerie Queene': Alterations and structure. By J.H.Walter
3. Some notes on Joachim du Bellay. By Janet Espiner-Scott
4. A disciple of 'Obermann': Eugène Fromentin. By A.Lytton Sells
5. The sociological approach to literature. By W.Witte

'Belzec' is polish and seems to be pronounced 'beu-zhets'. The interpretation seems to be in terms of a 'fart' from a bowed position = 'bow-jets'. Even boats have 'bows' around which the water is 'jetted' to both sides - also for the name-conversion of Hitler to Eidsvig via the 'earth-jets' of the plough. I am not well acquainted with the phenomenon but have speculated if cannibalism leads to excessive flatulence (such as Charles Darwin is said to have suffered from) and if that could be the reason for this peculiar interest which the nazis took in the phenomenon. It is not only because of the 'nas-i' term?

1 = when J is P, it turns into Pauffrey Pauser (the man in need of a place to fart?) and if the 'Park-aret' is 'Gal-way', there could be some 'bow-jets' or 'bow-shets' there
2 = this 'feerie queen' could be the posture of a person excreting = 'landing the shet'
3 = the joking 'du Bellay' could be that flatulence for 'Belzec'. If the 'jane is Thesbiner's cott', it could be about a small theatre performance which is called a 'sketch': 'Be sketch' = 'Belzec' = 'biscuits', the theme of the host. En 'ape i skapet' ('ape in the cupboard') = 'episcopy'
4 = an 'obermann' - is that a forefather, one sharing the genetics of the disciple 'undermann' who has been eaten or who eats? 'Allison Tells' could be about that sort of 'telepathy' which seems to be associated with cannibalism.
5 = such 'sociological' explanations to literature, e.g. the poetic muse as a result of cannibalist telepathy, would be the nazi interpretation of the muse - or simply 'W.Witte'

Shetlands-Larsen could be the theme. He travelled 52 times with boat from Shetland to Aalesund and thereabout transporting 'saboteurs' across the dangerous german waters. He is the highest decorated marine officer from WWII, hence a sort of 'ferry queen'.

Sobibor is represented in terms of the pederasty parametre in MLR April 1941:

1. Some lost saints' lives in old and middle English. By R.M.Wilson
2. Did Shakespeare produce his own plays? By Alfred Hart
3. The 'autobiography' of Edward, first lord Herbert of Cherbury: the original manuscript material. By R.I.Aaron
4. On linguistic explanation. By Manfred Sandmann
5. Balzac and Thackeray. By W.C.D.Pacey
6. Sixty years of Goethe, 1880-1940. By J.Bithell

Sobibor was opened on 7 May 1942 after the building of it started in March 1942. The dead bodies were first buried in the forest and after 1942 burned on a grid of railway iron rails - probably for represting the bottom of a child. and hence this April 1941 would have been one year in advance of the opening. Sobibor represents the nazi-philosophical parametre of 'pederasty', the moment when the adult penis glides in between the labia of the anus of the child - the very 'penetration' - whereby the child's small body is transformed by mystery into the adult by way of the relatively small shape of the penis.

1 = if the lost sperm of the pederast corresponds to the lost aspects of the life of the infant, the union of these 'sacrifices' are found in the in-gli[de]-sh of the old and the young. That is where the 'mystic conversion' takes place for a nazi philosopher
2 = consequently, did Shakespeare produce his 'owen' plays?
3 = hence 'ed-war-d' is writing on himself, his owen life, with herber-t and c-herber-y in name and title and place/plays
4 = the ex-planation of the 'ling-uistic', the labia - the spreading out of them
5 = Balzac = Belzec = the cannibalist parametre, the colon of the child containing the 'thanks-giving' - of 'deep acey' where the sperm of pederasty meets the excrements of the cannibal
6 = hence ate in atey = sperm in excrements, and I tin farty. And if 'J bit hell', it would have been the infant's bit on the J which was a 'hell' - and the whole holocaust would have been considered such a rape for this 'pederasty' parametre

Hence the titles seem to be a close study of the nazi mystery of the pederast interfacing with the potential cannibal.

Conclusion on the death camps - and the Rwanda genocide:

In short, there is no doubt that there is a british responsibility claim on the main nazi death camps - in particular 'Treblinka' is convincing - and there are reasons to believe that this responsibility is equivalent with an order from the british prime minister's office. Quite simply that England organized the holocaust and that Hitler's government followed order from London.

Why haven't anybody told this before?

In particular, why hasn't Israel told about it? It is not possible to believe that they didn't know about it.

It seems that the whole world (99,9 percent of the world's population is a good guess) believe that England is a country which opposes use of terror and genocide as a political tool, while it seems that the truth is that the british prime minister's office has been the heart of terror all over the world throughout the 20th century.

People believe that England is their friends and it is the very opposite. People all over the world believe that they share interests with England.

But this means that the story really is 'genocide' in that sense of it: People believe that they and England are one and the same people or species, one and the same 'nation of peace-searchers', and that is precisely what makes terror conducted from Downing Street 10 a case of genocide: It is an attack on the traditional relations of confidence such as typically are found within family relations.

Hence the british government seems to conceive of itself as the heart of a new 'religion' of a dark and satanic character with 'suicide' as the main factor. It also seems to mean that although mass murder is the preferrable source of 'meaning of life' for this religion, some cosy warmth can also be obtained from cheatings and disappointments of spiritual values. In particular destruction of valuable historic sources which cannot be repaired seems to have some value. People give birth to their children in a hospital department and when the employees make a third eye on the infant with laser tools (I don't know if this is going on), that is to perform damage on basis of the confidence because this confidence is what define people as 'one nation' or rather 'one species' and it gives some 'warmth' in London by the genocidal factor.

This means that people have been cheated when they have been in London - they would probably not have gone there if they knew these facts of MLR - and that disturbs their world view and blurs the sense of historic truth and probably leads to deterioration of the capacity to make sound judgements. One cannot both criticize Hitler for his regime and travel to London as if that were not two sides of the same coin. Gandhi was in London (I think he was) and thereafter he was shot (apparently with a responsibility claim in MLR January 1948). That could be how London keeps up the sense of 'being right'.

The phenomenon is called 'double fold' and is imitated in viennese 'butterdough' which folds in thousands of layers. Is this simply the 'double bind' which was credited with being the cause of schizophrenia? The 'double fold' really means having the [penis]-head inside the [double?] fold - and then one already knows much if the truth is what the nazi intrigue fears most. If they shot Gandhi because he had been in London, that was for 'being right' - but it is only when one peeps inside this 'fold' that one can get a glimpse of the truth. Could be this is the background for the nazi interest in the phenomenon of 'penis-in-vagina'.

It seems that one can conclude that the story of the holocaust ends up with a blood-thirsty variant of Christianity in England - based on the factor of genocide as a tragically naive interpretation of ejaculation of sperm.

Has England stopped genociding? It seems that the truth is far from anything such! There is an MLR responsibility claim even for the recent Rwanda genocide in 1994 by the following phenomenon: GAS-PAS-GAS is mirror-symmetric if one adds five days to the Halabjah gasing of 16 March 1988. These five days can be recognized in the interval between the death of hungarian PM Jozsef Antall on 12 December 1993 and the shooting of norwegian FM Johan Jörgen Holst five days later, on 17 December 1993. Antall allegedly died from 'non-Hodgkin lymphoma' in the colon, which probably makes it related to the symbolism in the Belzec complex, while Holst was shot by an intruder apparently while he was in bed with a woman. The story seems to be contained in MLR October 1993:

1. A Yorkshire background for 'Wuthering heights'. By Christopher Heywood
2. The villain of Wildfell Hall: Aspects and prospects of Arthur Huntingdon. By Marianne Thormählen
3. Voltaire's Anecdotes sur Bélisaire and the Journal chrétien. By G.Gargett
4. Violette Leduc's 'L'Asphyxie': The double face of maternity. By Alex Hughes
5. Natalia Ginzburg's 'La madre': Exposing patriarchy's erasure of the mother. By Adalgisa Giorgio
6. The lovers of Teruel: A 'romantic story'. By D.W.Cruickshank
7. The bibliography of german 'volksbücher': A review article. By John L.Flood
8. Kaspar's wooden horse: A metaphor of childhood? By Paul A.MacKenzie
9. Kraus and Shakespeare: A dramaturgical investigation. By Mike Rogers

The series seems to be based on ambiguities - Hollywood (= 'Treholt'?) genre - which perhaps even could represent the five days gap between Antall and Holst:

1 = a) the gunman hidden in the cupboard - b) the lovers meet in her bedroom (after 'julebord'?)
2 = a) they discuss if they shall have sex - b) but s/he is married and what to do?
3 = a) period not safe and she does not want - b) he forces himself towards intercourse
4 = a) he puts on condom - b) he puts a pillow over her face
5 = a) she exposes herself - b) he forces himself over her, pulls off her clothes
6 = a) lovers romantic - b) lovers of terror ('Cruickshank' = possible AIDSHIV)
7 = a) they make love and dipsomaniac 'L. Flood' - b) nazi rape of the Jews - Sobibor
8 = a) the sperm enters the uterus - b) the gunman from cupboard shoots him in the head
9 = a) pregnancy test shows 'yes' - b) criminal investigation of 'pubes' etc for proving rape

In short, the series of titles suggests that a british agent - possibly after having shared an old common friend on the forks of a 'julebord' as a smart trick - the same old friend (PAS?) as later in the evening steps out from the cupboard in the 'moment of truth' - lured Holst into her home and she had made a tape-recording in advance. She shoots him in the bed and later tells the police what happened: He had suggested sexual intercourse but she had told him that she was afraid of getting pregnant and also of getting sick, but he would not listen and forced himself to an intercourse including asphyxiating her with a pillow and she had no other choice than to desperately grab the gun in her nighttable and shoot him in his head. Her security microphones could attest the story. The police listened through the tape and were convinced - 'Mike Rogers': It is his voice and there is no doubt what happens. Even the pulling of the nighttable drawer and the metallic sound of the gun and everything is precise and no doubt. He had tried to rape her and that was the story on 17 December 1993. The responsibility claim in MLR October 1993 tells that this must have been a fictive story - there is a double bottom in nearly every title. One notices the 'duke on duke' of Goebbels/Pope.

But he allegedly survived albeit in bad condition and could have told the police his version of it if he were conscious. If he were and agreed to her version, it could have been a clever trick and he never saw the gunman stepping out of the cupboard or escaping afterwards. But if he never were conscious, he could have been put in 'verboten' condition untill they pulled the cable on 12 January. But if he were conscious enough to be questioned, the question of his authenticity could also have been present. But there is probably no agent who would let himself be shot in the head for an imitative job.

Holst was the second 'Brundtland' FM who died within a few years - Frydenlund was the former FM of Brundtland and he reportedly died on the toilet in the end of the eighties during an official dinner ('cannibalism'?). In short, one gets the impression that Antall (whose name means something very close to 'Josef Mengele') symbolized Belzec and the cannibalist parametre while Holst symbolized Sobibor and hence the pederasty parametre. When Holst survived he was transported to Sunaas hospital where he died on 12 January 1994 - the same day as the 'cable' was 'pulled' from Rwanda to the UN peacekeeping forces in New York (the office was led by Kofi Annan at that time, according to some web page) that if they did not send troops to Rwanda the genocide would go as planned. Nothing happened and some 800.000 people were slaughtered - same number as Verdun, Treblinka and Shansi. It means that the three events appear to have been coordinated on basis of the symbolism in 'Aktion Reinhard' - and then MLR October 1993 looks like a responsibility claim.

There was one of the probably 'octogon' stories - of the very formal type with a woman 19 years older than me and even my chief as fresh library (title 7) assistant - whose husband was then a brain surgeon in that hospital to which Holst was sent. She told me that they were separated but not formally divorced and he had got a new girfriend who even had moved into the house and she had fled the place and separated from him - but strictly formally speaking she was not yet divorced. But this was her version and I don't know what the facts were.

This could have been the correlate to the Boer War a hundred years later minus the five years which were the five days. 'Boer war' in norwegian means 'the struggle in the home'.

I don't know what happened with Holst - he was known as a serious scholar of political science before he was invited by Gro Harlem Brundtland to be her foreign minister - and many would perhaps have found it surprising to find him in such conditions. He did not appear to be the type who would have made a career in the party by dirty methods but would wait till he was invited to be a member of the government. If he were put in 'verboten' condition that could have been for the 'new' sort of nazi-political parametres. However one twists and turns it, there seems to have been a british responsibility claim to this story in MLR October 1993 and hence also to the Rwanda genocide - which could have been the purpose with the story.

I think many people considered the end of Frydenlund and Antall and then Holst too well timed to believe that it could have been an ordinary death and many would have guessed that it was a pulk. Jon Michelet wrote about 'the kneeler' - the grasshopper species where the female eats or at least murders the male after copulation (cp. the 'structure' in the cupboard) - as if this should have been a story linked to me kneeling in front of the toilet bowl in Dröbak in the early 80's. And then there could have been links even to Ehamgasse 2004 - and to Voldgaten 1 in the Old Town 1978-80.

Was this story of Holst the whole story of Norway 1974-1994? As if it had been drafted on a desk in London (or Washington?) decades earlier? I met Gröver/'Mengele' in a cafe near Andvord in Oslo in the late eighties and he told me with a strange look that 'det er antallet det kommer an paa' = 'it is the number which matters'. ('Det er han tallet' = 'George Walker Bush' = G-VII-B = 6713 for my JBG = 7136 representing 'James Bond' = secret agent, cp. the SNO school of Besland and the NOS of Gogol - and 'det kommer ramp og' = 'there comes ramp/bullies/mob as well'). A sexual intercourse could perhaps also be called a 'number', like 'Antall'. I don't remember if this was the same time as when the waiter poured a cup of coffee into his lap and pretended like nothing. I tried to tell the waiter that it did matter but he just shook me off - and so did Gröver/'Mengele' with another strange look. Could they have appointed the theatre in advance? But why? If that is 'kofi annan', it means 'jo han jör gen holst' - and Antall was already served in the emphasis of the importance of the number. If this means that the sexual 'number' is the important issue, it could also mean 'man in cupboard' = 'mann (i) skapet' = 'mannskapet' = 'crew', and adding to this 'landskapet /dansk ape / regnskapet' there is the 'MLR' - wherein the particular 'number' could have been given. 8ell4 from the L.Flood-ing - half of the 'octogon'? But that probably means that the names of Antall and Holst - which seem to be absent from the titles - are found indirectly through these stories from the cafe near Andvord.

When Antall died from a 'non-Hodgkin lymphoma', that sounds a little like an unconventional (non-headkill?) nymphomaniac and hence the element of 'rape' could have applied to him. The story of the allegedly swapped penis-heads could then have been the element of a five days gap. This story could perhaps resemble the one of Holst' authenticity. Clearly if I had got a new penis-head from a freezer - if that is possible, I don't know if it is - they would probably (probably in any case) have needed to 'wash it out' before it was put in its new place. 'Vask-a-ut-i-[j]UD', 'va skutt i UD/hodet', 'vaska ut i hodet'. Wash-in-g-t-on?

Sachs' letter of 31.5.63

The study has suggested that there is some basis for the hypothesis that Thoursie and Sachs could have gone for a trip by car to Molde in the spring 1963 for giving her a chance to meet me, and that we could have met when I likely would have been on my way down Parkveien to the kindergarden at St.Sunniva hospital. I would have gone down Glomstuveien and Parkveien - probably along with my same age friend Jan-Egil Nygaard who lived in the house next door. Whatever happened, most of it would likely have been observed by Thoursie who could have been standing next to her. On her return to Stockholm, she sent a letter to Elisabeth Borchers on 31.5.63 - if that were sent after such a trip to visit me in Molde in the spring of 1963. The letter is short and could in principle be seen as a brief recount of the possible essentials in the meeting such as Thoursie could have observed them and such as I could have remembered them.

Click here for the letter published in "Briefe der Nelly Sachs"

The text of the letter is the following: "elisabeth liebe Schicke keine Bücher nur [?] Erik ich muss ins Krankenhaus Wieder das Gleiche als Anlass Post wird nachgeschickt Innig Li 31.5.63". It can be read as a recount of what happened - 'ich muss in Kindergarten' etc - and could be seen as a letter from me = Sachs to her = me etc in the moment of meeting in the street. The letter to Borchers could have served to tell me things and to prevent administration from intruding into the relation. The handwriting can be misinterpreted as 'Ulrike Meine-bücher' and could have been [mis]interpreted as the background for the construction of Ulrike Meinhof if she were a secret agent for England - if she had not been the chief editor of the periodical 'konkret' from 1960-63 or thereabout. Such a secret agent for England as Meinhof could have been on basis of this letter could have collected a lot of sympathy - not the least among young intellectuals - in the role of me as the angry revolter after the nazi germans had murdered my jewish parents, but little by little this sympathy would - not the least via other british terror - have come to an end and eventually landed on the opposite view that the jewish-genetic diaspora is a bunch of terrorists. The secret agent in such a role would then have been wedged into the small chances there were for Sachs to share something with me which was not under the control of secret service. 'Schicke keine Bücher nur Erik' would have been my message to her when I met her and Thoursie if he stood next to her - could have observed just this - or rather the message would have been that since she had published or would publish her 'Selected poems' (selected by Enzensberger) in the same year, including the poem "So steigt der Berg", and since Thoursie was the one who had brought her first book with him from East Berlin to Stockholm for her first view of it in 1947, the story in her letter to Borchers would have told that it was a theme of something like this. It means that Sachs was not expelled from her meeting with me whatever political arrangements could have been launched after the meeting.

One notices the writing error between 'nur' and 'Erik' - an error which could be about a similar story, see the revelation in Vilnius with the slash or 'tear' over the 'tear'. With the following 'ich' looking like 'rik' administration could even read into it the concept of jewish circumcision which is contained in her 1963 book and in the revelation in Vilnius.

Since the recent change of power in Labour in England from Blair to Brown could have served to index the slanting 'Traherne'-diagonal line from the homunculus in San Pantalon to the Göring-Swift character, it could even have been about this slash over the vertical line in this letter.

But that is precisely where one could find the background for the story of Holst 1993 in the possible summary conclusion 'vask ut i hodet' etc. What does the mystery symbol between 'nur' and 'Erik' mean? It is clearly a writing error but that would probably make administration even more inclined to assign meaning to it, and then the meaning is likely to have been interpreted as the contents of some possibly non-verbal communication to me from her - preferrably of a kind which could not be known to others. The answer to the mystery of this interpretation could be found in just the story of Holst and the 'washing' symbolism in the sense of 'I kiss you' in russian 'ja tseluju vash' (sth like that). But that means that since the WASH also can be a reference to Washington, there are the three spelling errors on Hitler's postcard: m/l, d/c, b/r for Kre-ML, Washington-DC, BR-itain. The mystery is solved when one discovers that this administrative reading can be recognized also in the parallel between Sachs' letter to Borchers and Hitler's postcard of 1924 as a responsibility claim on the death of Lenin:

elisabeth liebe = Firma Eugene Paisseau
Schicke keine Bücher = Um unsere Geschäftsverbindung
nur Erik = die durch den Krieg unterbrochen wurde
ich muss im Krankenhaus = wieder aufzunehmen
Wieder das Gleiche als Anlass = bitte ich Sie mir schnellsten Horn Britt Buffals etc.
Post wird nachgeschickt = wie ich sie früher von Ihnen gehabt habe zu bemustern.
Innig Li = Hochachtungsvoll
31.5.63 = 8elc4

But that is of course perfect for the administrative intrigue of assigning to Sachs the role of a secret agent for Hitler - as if he wrote the poetry and she published it under her name while waiting for the great politician to become salonfähig again. It is a parallel text just like Oftedal's nomination letter of Gandhi to the titles of MLR January 1948. Clearly this background could have been a part of the reason why my own poem went in parallel with Hitler's postcard and why I thereby found it in 2003 - my poem is really in parallel with Sachs' letter (readable as to/from me etc).

And then one can study the details of the mystery symbol from a 'political' viewpoint: It seems to mean 'durch den Krieg'. That could also be durch the 'i' from Vilnius as a background for the attempt on the pope in 1981.

And if 'Ulrike Meinhof' can be read from the first line in the letter, 'Andreas Baader' could perhaps be read from the last. And even reflexes of some other names from the same group - such as Gudrun Ensslin, Jan-Carl Raspe, Holger Meins - could be spotted here and there.

In short, it is not impossible that this could have been a background for the construction of the german terrorist group - but one does not have to presuppose such historically for the assumption that british administration assigns this role to them today.

One could also observe the two following letters in "Briefe der Nelly Sachs" after 31.5.63 - to Gudrun Harlan (= 'nur') and Erik Lindegren (= 'Erik'), between which there is a short poem at the end of the letter to Harlan - a poem which otherwise is unpublished: "Hiob du befragst das Sandkorn? / warum schmerzt du? / Aber das Sandkorn schmerzt weiter / Seine Antwort ist der Schmerz -". British administration could then perhaps have been inclined to interpret this in the sense of me as the 'Sandkorn' in Molde and as structurally in the same place as the 'writing error' in the letter to Borchers. 'Mor & Erik' could even be read 'Mo[the]r & Serif' such as in the venetian interpretation - cp. also 'Aldo Moro' 1978 - or even 'mor & Stiefl'. Hopefully not about Kurt Köck from Ehamgasse. (Grand chef Bernard Loiseau allegedly shot himself - in the mouth? - on 28.2.3 at the end of the month of 1.2.3. with the Columbia space shuttle disaster). 'Hi-up' could be the nazi interpretation of the effect of verboten chemicals - a 'Sandkorn' could be enough - and then they could assign to me the role of this verboten 'Sandkorn'. The cuneiform sign which looks like this slashed vertical line does not seem to exist in the inventory of cuneiform symbols but the tilted horizontal variant does - it is sign #60 (in at least akkadian) and seems to mean 'ah, ba' etc (cp. the form 'abbastanza'). When I first looked at MLR January 2009 it seemed to me to index a look by telescope or whatever from Fortuny on Giudecca in Venice over the canal to Zattere as a horizontal line - which could have its transform in a satellite camera lens - a 'celestial eye' above. That could be the vertical line - in which case the slash could be the 'Traherne' diagonal in San Pantalon. This hypothesis on 'cuneiform semantics' is perhaps a little farfetched, though. I notice that 'Elisabeth Borchers' is a name which could sound somewhat like 'er lita tid bor der' and hence 'new address within short time'. I should credit Thoursie or rather his wife with what I interpreted as a more or less deliberate hint to this interpretation of Sachs' letter via the notice of new address within short time - perhaps even with a hint about the fate of Holst.

There have been several articles by an author 'Elisabeth Stopp' in MLR. The background in a political sense for this name could perhaps be recognized in the letter to Borchers and perhaps even in the hypothetical trip to Molde.

If this story of Frydenlund, Antall, Holst and Rwanda should have been more or less the whole matrix of norwegian public reality 1974-1994, it could even be that the whole purpose of it could have been this bizarre project of lifting Sachs' authorship from her to Hitler. In any case it seems to have been a part of the continuation from 'Aktion Reinhard' which could have meant 'Eidsvig Ragna'. Cp. also 'rak-tang röver' (from San Pantalon, the 'devold' man with the tang = tongs and 'röd V-er' behind San Pantalon) and hence 'röktön jövök' as for 'Antall' and the 'moment of truth' stepping out from the cupboard.

MLR April 1968

It was on 12 May 1968 that the new postal codes were introduced in Sweden. It was two years before 12 May 1970 with death and burial of Sachs and Celan - and the birthday of Ragna Augusta Gröver. The postal codes seem to contain the 'Aktion Reinhard' = 'Eidsvig Ragna' link from Söder (Holmqvists) to Norway. The issue is interesting because it can be seen to contain also the name of 'Gro Harlem Brundtland' in the first three titles:

1. 'King Lear' and renaissance paradoxes. By Brian Vickers
2. Narrative distance in 'Jane Eyre': The relevance of the pictures. By Jane Millgate
3. T.S.Eliot's 'Long unlovely street'. By A.A.Mendilow
4. Imitation in Ronsard: 'O de Nepenthe...' By Grahame Castor
5. The idea of 'judgement' in Montaigne. By S.John Holyoake
6. Aspects stylistique des 'Mémoires' de la Rochefoucauld. By D.E.Secretan
7. An unpublished letter from Ballanche to Lamennais. By A.J.L.Busst
8. The use of colour in 'La Naussée'. By D.J.Fletcher
9. The textual history of Tirso's 'La Venganza de Tamar'. By Alan K.G.Paterson
10. Old english 'dryht' - a new suggestion. By D.H.Green
11. Parallel attitudes to form in late Beethoven and late Goethe: Throwing aside the appearance of art. By R.T.Llewellyn
12. Halm's 'Griseldis': A landmark in nineteenth-century german drama. By Peter Skrine
13. The stage as metaphysical institution: Zuckmayer's dramas 'Schinderhannes' and 'Der Hauptmann von Köpenick'. By E.Speidel
14. History and cruelty in Peter Weiss's 'Marat/Sade'. By John J.White


The assumption is that this issue encodes the name of either one or both of Ragna Gröver (custody mother) and Gro Harlem Brundtland relative to Sachs' (genetic mother) letter of 31.5.63. The name means about the same in norwegian as in english. Brundtland = brown-land, with a taint of heat or rut[ting] = 'brunst'. 'Storting' is the term for the norwegian parliament, possibly with a reflex in 'Stonehenge' which then would find a correlate in the 'stones' under the 'grown hardlimb'. The name Gro Harlem Brundtland can be seen in the three first titles and the 'counterpoint' to this in titles 4-6 - and there is the hypothesis that this could be about Sachs after she had met me in Molde - as if she had asked e.g. Thoursie to 'measure' the length, which then could be administratively interpreted as 'Aktion Reinhard'. Titles 7-14 can be read as an imitation of the letter of Sachs of 31.5.63 to Elisabeth Borchers. The presence of Brundtland's name is not surprising in light of the birthname 'Danderyd' ('Tantolunden') of her mother - like 'Eidsvig' for 'Aktion Reinhard' of my custody mother.

1. 'Kingel' is the (gossamer) substance which an 'arachna' ('a Ragna') spider (author 13) produces - closely affiliated with the substance of semen - and 'kingel-vev' = 'spiders web' such as often are found in a 'corner' = 'krok' = 'hook' = 'GroH'. As a paradox the kingel is outside the penis-head and not inside the scrotum. Hence in the style of 'braine fickers' out/in?
2. When the hardlimb grows up, it is 'J in air'. Porn pictures? J and mill-gate. O-gust-a?
3. The toilet's long and unlovely street = the bowels for emptying = Brundtland, g-Röver.
4. The emotion of genetic relevance after meeting with child = 'offspring'
5. Measuring the length of the rod/breast/vagina = Madonna as Young Holmoak (Fatima)
6. Same aspects of hospitalization as in 1960: She had just been in contact with the genetic family
7. An unpublished letter from Nelly Sachs to the norwegian lamb. Could be the one of 31.5.63. See title 1 with aspect = outside/inside in the letter: I am her and vice versa
8. The use of calling for me ('land aa se' = 'sheep o-ho-i' = 'the lamb') in the meeting in the street = 'elisabeth liebe' (not 'diebe'!) = line 1
9. The textual book-history of Thoursie from Berlin 1947 = 'In den Wohnungen des Todes'. Could 'Allan Petterson' - the swedish composer with the very long symphonies in one movement - be a symbol of the 1947 Dead Sea Scrolls found when Thoursie found her book? = line 2
10. nur (?) Erik ich muss = line 3 ('drit' is norwegian for 'crap' = 'I must crap', cp. 'er rik' = 'is rich')
11. line 4 = parallel attitudes to form in late Sachs and leid Hitler
12. line 5 = 'Widde dask Leiche' = the schlaff and dead penis against the 'widde' = necrophilia. Holm's 'old pig' as the basis for the Young Holmoak of Madonna in Fatima
13. line 6
14. line 7 = Andreas Baader = Marat said it, me turning to look back after departure

Which means that line 8 = 'Innig Li' is read in the same 'dirty' way of 'inni gli' = 'glide inside' for the 'in-gli-sh' as the aim of the 'grow hardlimb brund[s]tland', alternating front and back reference. But when the history is 'kröllete' it tends to be about the behind and then it would be about the rape of a child = pederasty.

Hence in this reading Gro Harlem Brundtland relative to the 'postal code' month of April-May 1968 with 'Aktion Reinhard' links to Söder/Holmqvist/Sachs could represent the idea of Sachs raping me. But that would mean only that Sachs would be Hitler - as seems to be the ridiculous british program.

Even Baader/Meinhof and RAF (doesn't that means 'Royal Air Force' really - such as for this Aktion Reinhard bridge Söder-Norway?) could thereby have come serve as a propaganda fuel for Gro Harlem Brundtland in Norway from 1968 onwards - for the program that Sachs = Hitler and vice versa in the same way that I = her and she = me in her letter.

Only title 13 seems a little difficult to read for me relative to line 6 in the letter, but there is in the 'keys to heaven' the sonnet algorithm with a particular similarity in the function of lines 7 and 13, both of which contains two 7 and two 13. Hence if title 13 maps onto line 7 and not line 6, which means that lines 5-6 are conceived of as one single line, then line 6 = line 7 comes out as 'Innig Li' for Marat in the bath or simply 'Sade' = 'Sachs'. And then the signature of 'Gro Harlem Brundtland' from the alternative reading will come out as the date 31.5.63 - which by way of the date 12 May 1968 could represent the date 12 May 1970 - or simply a responsibility claim on the murder of Sachs, as one could expect in MLR. One notices the author names of 13 and 14. The beginning of the first article in the April 1968 issue is telling of this: "Why the seven stars are no more than seven" etc.

Clearly this background has not been favourable for my time in Norway in the 30 years from 1970 up to 2000.

Astrid Proll's photo book about the Baader-Meinhof group is published on Aufbau Verlag. Proll was a member of the group and drove the car when Baader was helped out of the prison. If this is the same jewish publishing house as was run by Sachs' own cousin Manfred George, one wonders whether the political project has been successful in the sense of turning affiliations around - as if e.g. Meinhof and Baader represented my voice (of revolt against the 'nazis') via this letter. Is it really that naive? Is that the reason for example for the stories from Vienna with 'Khan Yunis' and the bombing of Lebanon and so forth? And possibly even Gaza 2008? If so, it could mean that perhaps somebody else than me should articulate what this could mean when it comes to jewish identity and intuitions. It could mean that the apparent british project of turning the jewish recognition of Sachs around with Hitler has been somewhat successful. And then it is time to think the matters over. It is likely that such a program would be more or less identically the same as the one of denying (or at least ignoring!) the english origin of the holocaust. And with a 1-2-3 ladder from England over Norway to Israel, the effects can be quite impressive, not the least if it is fuelled by the genocide of Rwanda (see also the in/out of title 1 etc for Vranda/Rwanda). There is no reason to believe that England will not heartily welcome a new holocaust against what remains of the jewish-genetic diaspora in the 21st century. It is the state of Israel who should have told the jews that it was England who organized the holocaust 1933-45. Which means that the declaration of independence of the new state of Israel should have been: "....hereby declare for opened. And we can add that it was England who organized the holocaust and who established the present state of Israel in the hope of making it possible to continue the holocaust". There was no answer to me from the israeli embassy in Berlin in 2004 - and that is indeed surprising in view of the data in this article.

The nazis have not been lazy in the decades since the war and it seems that there has been a hectic 'war against the intellectuals' which also means that today it may be difficult to find a jewish cultural institution which could be able to understand the point in the present article that it was London who organized the holocaust.

It was in the late seventies that I was invited to join another three persons for an easter holiday trip to Warszaw by car. The driver reminded me - as I remember it now - a little of Proll but I don't think it was her. The reason for this association is rather in the following: 'Warszaw' can be recognized in the 'up-and-down' of the name of the publisher of Modern Language Review which is 'The Modern Humanities Research Association' - which by up-down of vowels comes out as something like 'the middle of Minotaurus arches is a Warszaw': The middle of Minotaurus is 'notau[r]' which means that the middle is the 't' which resembles the mystery symbol between 'nur' and 'Erik' in Sachs' letter of 31.5.63. At the time of the trip, I worked in the library (I think it was while I earned money - not 'Maney' - at the library, before I turned to money-work by writing out orchestral parts = 'noter') in Fredrikstad whose chief was 'Arne Kr.Sollid' which on the form 'Sollid-arne-cr.' looks like 'Solidarnosc' (established in 1980) and which in theory could have been the background of the labour movement starting in Gdansk. The story with the background for Holst in hospital in 1993 - and the flooding at Rekustad 1977-78, cp. the MLR October 1993 title "The bibliography of german 'volksbücher': A review article. By John L.Flood" - could be traced to the same library environments.

'Modern Language Review' rewrites somewhat to 'mid L. Leszek Walesa', cp. 'Lech Walesa'. Could this have been about a 'double fold'? Some surprise effect in the social interface can perhaps be obtained by moving the colon over to become a sort of vagina. What sort of 'article' would be needed for a 'review'? If 'Schicke keine Bücher' is the background of 'Ulrike Meinhof', there could be the theme of german 'Volksbücher'. In fact the one who invited me to join them on the trip had a name ('pi- something plus german hairdressing morph)which associates with the idea of hairdressing on a circle - hence 'ull er ikke me inhof'. This means that the story with Holst as the background for Rwanda 1994 could be traced via the library environments 1977-78 even to Solidarnosc 1980. Even the 'Biafra' crisis 1967-1970 could find a reflex in the name. It was, according to an article in Microsoft Encarta, in the middle of the sixties that a separatist movement started in Biafra and Odumegwu Ojukwu (!) declared the state independent in May 1967. When they had to give up in 1970, some one million people had died in the crisis. The following years made the name of 'Ulrike Meinhof' very present in the german minds, and with this background it makes the mystery symbol rather present in the current reality. In fact it looks like the polish L with a slash over it - as in the middle of 'Walesa' pronounced 'wawensa' on US TV etc. The name of 'Odumegwu Ojukwu' could have affinities with the story with Holst 1993 - a scholar at UPI (!) who would not be expected to have forced himself into the government. The name backwards even sounds a little like hairdressing the anus - which again could suggest that when it is backwards of an 'anus' name it means that the colon is forwards. This means that with the trip to Warszaw inbetween the Biafra crisis and Frydenlund-Antall-Holst-Rwanda, there is a certain weight on Solidarnosc on background of the library story. And when the letter was to 'Elisabeth Borchers, Neuwied', there is the element of 'L is a bit borders' and hence the civil war in Biafra/Nigeria could have served to create the impression that Sachs had written this symbol in order to represent her name - but if that name again was me on my way to kindergarden, 'er lita tid bor der', there would have been the political association of me with much catastrophes. Plus the element of 'new wied'. In fact Norway found its new riches of oil outside the coast I think in the late sixties. One could be inclined to wonder whether the af[f]rican 'warming' could have been with 'support' from UK or US. 'Bi-affr[[e]rik]a' could then be about two fricational 'l' symbols, the one over the other, as in San Pantalon. Politics is sometimes easy to understand: One just finds a pretext for mass murder, such as this L, and that is the story. For the present case, the catastrophes would have served to give a framework to the project of Gro Harlem Brundtland.

This means that it is likely that british administration got hold of a copy of the letter to Borchers and may have defined it as a 'Borderau' parallel to Hitler's postcard. For making something big out of the communication after her meeting with me, they could have contacted nigerian forces for starting a civil war in Biafra. One million people died from this 'idea' which somebody got in the british administration. It is difficult to understand it as anything but a minimal pretext for a maximal mass murder.

If this story has been defining for the modern Poland after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, one wonders if the purpose with it could have been to create a basis for politics on Lithuania as the 'Turkish' part of the crossover to the Black Sea Loop which goes like a vertical line with the slanting Vilnius-Vienna-Venice line (going also across Warszaw) as on this mystery symbol in her letter. The affrication of these two lines, if they be L's of either normal or polish type, is not really in the oral space but rather on the paper - where the one borders onto the other. That would be in Vienna. Which could be a minimal pretext for a maximal mass murder of 'british' type. But then the Biafra civil war could have been a template for some later conflict - such as a 'balkan war' of 2011-12 which thereby could be an impressive top on such a big cake. One notices also that the links to Poland would have had to go via ups-and-downs of the vowels in the name of the periodical and its publisher, just like the ups-and-downs of Vilnius-Vienna-Venice.

The mystery symbol                                              Hitler's signature on the 1924 postcard

If the mystery symbol is supposed to be a number, which number could it be? 8 perhaps, or even 4: 8ell4 - like Hitler's signature which looks like NellyX. 'Digital man' = 'han tallet' = 'Antall', which then could be about how my initials Grover John Bjarne GJB = 6713 relates to George Walker Bush GWB = 6-VII-B = 6713. Could be that is why I felt that I understood so many strange things about politics in the years 2001-2009. Han tallet. 8L4. With the SNO school of Beslan and NOS in the strange bread of Gogol. I think 7136 is what relates me to the Eisenhower doctrine in such a way that it encodes James Bond - the mystery man. A secret agent! But I am not an agent.

This is how administrative interest could have tilted the symbol to paste it over the map of Europe from Turkey around the Black Sea over Vienna to Switzerland. It seems to stop before it comes to France. The diagonal then goes from Vilnius over Warszaw and Vienna down across Venice and probably down towards Corsica and Sardinia.

Or is it simply Midori's violin?

The sum of the entire story is perhaps that it gets more and more difficult to write poetry. Administration soon totally controls computer writing by way of surveillance - and even hand-writing of poetry is getting difficult under such circumstances.

What is Rwanda about? For the story of Holst, if the man who steps out of the cupboard (for sending his bullet into Holst's 'egg' when Holst sends his sperm into her egg) is the counterpoint to the man hopping out from a Vranda, there are the stories of the suicide hoppers from 'Prekestolen' in Norway. More specifically, the slogan during the constitution-making on Eidsvoll in Norway in 1814 was 'united and loyal untill Dovre falls'. Dovre is the snowy mountains between Norway and Sweden and they clearly represent the white cliffs of Dover. After Norway had been declared an independent nation - free from the custody of Denmark - on 17 May 1814, they went right into a union with Sweden and were held in custody there untill the country was declared independent in 1905. This union 1814-1905 would then have been a union with England - via Dovre/Dover - and the waterway border. If the old sagas and historic stuff from the middle ages are all nonsense from the Scriblerus Club, it could even be that 1905 was the year when the kingdom of Norway was opened for the first time in history. I suppose it is not that bad - there must exist other and independent sources - but one must in any case rather far back in history for finding an independent kingdom before 1905. If this Dovre/Dover has a correlate in Rwanda/Vranda, one could guess that it could be about the state of Israel on the other side of the 1-2-3 ladder. Or, since the slogan was 'united and loyal untill Dovre falls', and this clearly referred to the waterway border to England, the fall of the border means the end of unity and loyalty. Would that have been about the situation in USA - for making a global state of 'civil' war for the final victory of british nazism with genocide as one of the fundamental parametres? We must hope that it is not that bad. For example, it could have been about a global state of war against the people of Israel - the end of unity and loyalty with England - in which case it could have been about a genocidal war against the jewish diaspora - a new holocaust. It may be urgently important that the facts be published that it was England who organized the holocaust 1933-45. It is in any case not I who am the 'secret agent' (7136 or whatever) from England who is planning to hunt down the people of Israel.


His two films Mirror (1975) and Stalker (1979) seem to be about my life/meetings with Sachs (1963) in Molde and Celan (1960) in Odda, in the zone near the house. Tarkowsky died prematurely in late 1986 from some cancer. The MLR January 2009 contains the first title "The logic of the clerk's tale". The logic of Tarkowsky's end in 1986 could have been that he had not been making films in conformity with british nazism. His father was a poet and the relation between them resembles the older and the younger Luigi Nono on Zattere - the house has been in the family apparently since the 1870's or thereabout. The Ehamgasse story - with 'orets boretts'-lag ÖVW (could that have been the reason for Hitler's 'Volkswagen'?) - includes the element of the 'Fiancee-runk-spy-trag' in terms of the 'beet-rooth'-ed stain on the wallpaper in my Abstellraum and at the lift when I moved out. 'You see the splinter in your brother's eye but not the beam in your own' (sth like that) is norwegian 'du ser splinten i din brors öye men bjelken i din egen blir du ikke var' which spoons/rewrites to 'du ser splinten i din brors öye men kjelken i din bete var du ikke blid', which means that when I am enraged due to the missing Finanzierungsbeitrag, it means that there was a stain of 'beetroot' on my wallpaper which was much worse than what I blamed others for. This 'kjelke' = 'sledge' could perhaps be about the penis conceived of as a 'sledge' (does that make sense?) if it is not about the 'Helge' (Dyvik - cp. 'kjelke tjuvi') who organized the doctorate committee for my dissertation. Which again means that if it be about this national pride of the glorious literary past of old nordic sagas, it is my 'sledge' which is blamed for the national problems. That could be the contents of the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' story including the british murder of Benazir Bhutto announced in advance in MLR. Du ser blinten i din brors söye = you see the black eye in your brother's ewe - which could be for the Black Sea Loop. This is what the national secret services work for in most of the european countries, it seems, and if democracy functioned there would probably not be many left in those services. All secrets of the totally ridiculous nazi program must be published in all details, which probably means that the storm of the Bastille this time must be a storm of the secret archives. These 'services' seem to be united in the program of launching evil under the banner that it originates in me. A letter recently had taken 2 weeks to reach me - as if it were 'driving slowly through Kent'. I hope the british administration does not plan to poison me. But where on earth can I be allowed to live in peace? It is totally permitted to do political analyses of published material. Why don't they thank me for this work instead?


was opened on 12 July 1936 Nord-Ost of Berlin. Although I am not certain that I have understood the encoding in MLR right, I bring the data and some discussion nevertheless, and the personal data must be taken as an example without much weight. The name seems to encode jointly Nelly Sachs' home, her house, and the collection of houses in Klipra in Aalesund: A 'saks' is an 'agent for klipra' = 'agent for scissors-off'. Klipra also means the 'cliffs-off' of the white cliffs of Dover. There are four titles in MLR April 1936:

1. What happens in 'Hamlet'? By W.W.Greg
2. Thomas Dekker and the 'overburian' characters. By W.J.Paylor
3. Ronsard's poetic growth, III. By Arthur Tilley
4. Coleridge as a philologist. By L.A.Willoughsby

1. Klipra is a small part of the town Aalesund, a little 'hamlet' it can be called. The World Wide Krieg of WWI was all and only about the Klipra connection, it seems.
2. The home's cover and the characters walking around over the soil = the sloughen-housen. When the double-you (the slough) is a cheap ailer, this sloughen-housen is likely to be about a sexen-housen with 'double fold'.
3. Runs hard creative growth, III = sex-en house. The author is tilling and is lifting-hausing it up. Sexen-hausing.
4. Sarxen-haüsen (flesh filled in log-space) - a Leif i Logsby = Leif (Stene?) i Plankebyen = Leif Stene Johansen in Fredrikstad?

These four categories seem to be the four 'serifs' of Venice. MLR January 1936 contains the keys:

1. Shakespeare's english and how far it can be investigated with the help of the 'New english dictionary'. By W.S.Mackie
2. The oriental origin of Chaucer's Canacee-falcon episode. By Haldeen Braddy
3. Notes on the poems of Bertran de Born, IV. By L.E.Kastner
4. The four elements in the imagery of Calderon. By E.M.Wilson
5. James Thomson: His translations of Heine. By G.A.Black

1. San Giovanni Novo

2. Formosa lift: I once asked Ihlebæk what he thought about my hypothesis that his father resembled Göring and he answered that his father had told him that he came from a cotter's farm ('husmann-s-plass') or small farm at Halden, cp. 'Halden-brakke'. A 'husmann' = 'houseman' could be the one who steps out from the cupboard ('kott') at Holst. In principle, this could be the secret of the mid point 5 of the 9-element Eisenhower doctrine. Göring was chief of the nazi air-forces - cp. 'Formosa lift'. HH in Rome 1981 told me that she had shared a flat with some people in the beginning of her time in Rome and she had lived in the closet.

3. San Trovaso - San Antonio's temptations. Lockerbie could serve to sequence #3 after #2 by the 'lifting' metaphor - and hence the bombing is what downed the lift of #2 in the fall at #3. It was 'found' on the ground after it had been 'thrown'. The 'Badiot Dolomitic' of Lockerbie by MLR October 1988 could be about a 'stalagmitic' contribution. I notice the 'very dirty bathtub' in the US film 'American Beauty'.

4. the 4 categories etc = Coleridge = sarxen-haüsen = Leif Stene Johansen = MLR October 1963. 4 = 4 and 4 x 4 = 16 when multiplied with the Coleridge og April 1936 - makes 16 of the Leif Stene Johansen complex. It should have been as a summary under #5 but is here #4 for such reasons. Cp. the lineshifts of MLR April 1968 relative to Sachs' letter. All this 4 x 4 = 16 is the secret administrative abuse of the sonnet algorithm.

5. Ognisanti = the way of all the saints/humans

Clearly if these four 'serif' churches cross at 'Malvasia Vecchia', this gingersnap in the middle is a sort of 'Sachsen-hausen'. Or simply AIDSHIV. One notices the four titles (minus #4) of January 1936 plus the four titles of April 1936 as being rather well paralleled with the 8 titles of October 1978 for the introduction of AIDSHIV (see above).

The birth of Celan, MLR October 1920

The titles of the articles are the following:

1. Vernacular books in England in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. By M.Deanesly
2. Alexander Nevile's translation of Senecas's 'Oedipus'. By Evelyn M. Spearing
3. 'The shepherd Tony' - a recapitulation. By M.St.Clare Byrne
4. Some provincial periodicals in Spain during the romantic movement. by E.Allison Peers
5. Notes on Lessing's 'Hamburgische Dramaturgie'. I. The plays of the Hamburg repertory. By J.G.Robertson

1. The key to the name is the one in the indexation of me in April 1957 - on the form 'speech acts' = 'Paul Ancel' + 'Pessach'. His fatherhood to me would have been in terms of his age 14-15 which would have been the earliest safe age for biological material.

2. But then the mother of me would already have been old - an 'Oedipus' relation. This is the crux of the story. It is the 'navel' which is the key to the mystery - if the old mother had such an 'alexander' navel since early infancy, she could still be the mother in this age. Only some 'spearing' would be needed.

3. Celan's first address was Wassilkogasse 5 in Czernowitz. 'The shepherd Tony' rewrites to 'Czernowitz' in about the same way as 'Wassilkogasse 5' rewrites to 'a recapitulation' (or 're-capi-2-lation'. 'Sengklærne' = 'the bedclothes' - could be they could offer some material. But due to the 'alexander navel' there would be no hurry although Sachsenhausen opened when Celan was still 15.

4. 'Modern Language Review' in the sense of 'Mother Father Me' (where me = John Bjarne Grover) would then be about the Galicia/Galizia district - the name is shared with the one in Portugal/Spain.

5. 'Bukowina' seems to be the origin of the camp Buchenwald which was opened on 12 July 1937 about a year after Sachsenhausen on 15 July 1936 - indexed in this 5/2 of 're-capi-2-lation'.

In short, there seems to be a unique indexation of Paul Pessach Ancel from Czernowitz in this October 1920 issue of MLR. Celan was born in November 1920. It means of course that he - and most probably Sachs - were born to the job - of being my genetic parents! It means that their parents probably were agents of some sort and hence one has to guess their own genetic parents. Both of them look a little similar to their official parents, though.


opened on 12 July 1937. The July issue of MLR 1937 contained the following titles:

1. 'The barbarous metre of Barclay'. By Fitzroy Pyle
2. 'Deor': A criticism and an interpretation. By F. Norman
3. A poet in chancery: Edward Benlowes. By Harold Jenkins
4. Ex Libris Politiani, II. By J.M.S.Cotton
5. Some unpublished french political poems of the sixteenth century. By Sylvia L.England
6. Some notes on german drama as national commentary in the seventeenth century. By W.F.Mainland
7. Notes on some unpublished papers of Reinhard Johannes Sorge: A contribution relating to the genesis of expressionism. By R.H.Thomas


1. Bar-bar-bar = 1-2-3. 'Fitzroy Pyle' sounds genetic.

2. Could be the two 'or' in the 'vulgata' reading of Exodus 20,4. Is ÖVW 'årets borettslag'? Even the name of 'Frank Tveor Nordensten' looks peculiarly relevant to this title. (In the contents overview it is "Norman, F., 'Deor': A criticism and an interpretation").

3. A poet in drancery? In transery - in the french lift? 'Benlös' is 'legless', like the feeling in Santa Maria Formosa.

4. Cotton was the owner of the library which burnt in 1731 and from which the only extant copy of 'Beowulf' was rescued from the flames. When this is II, it could mean that it was an edited version of the poem which was rescued - for example the Scriblerus Club's version.

5. tells of 'french' - but that seems to be only in the sense of the french lift to Dover: 'United and loyal untill Dover/Dovre falls' is the 'national commentary' at Eidsvoll 1814 = the AIDSHIV lift.

6. These are the notes of the mainland - hence the german part of the erste-zweite-dritte Reich.

7. The hebrew genesis of 'dritte' expressionism.

The shared format of titles 5-6-7 seem to be about the titles 1-2-3: The erste-zweite-dritte Reich. I hope the plan is not to saw up my skull for letting somebody quite simply express the excrements from above into the open hole. Then it is the menu which is in the focus of public attention. This 'edited version' could then be the theme of the 1-2-3. If the old nordic sagas and eddic poetry and literary sources of various kinds are mainly british fiction from the 18th century, the idea could be that if the literary sources of 'the people of Iceland' go bankrupt like the state of Iceland in the autumn 2008, then the 1-2-3 could be intended to secure that the same obtains for the hebrew traditions. Could be there is not so much left of the historic sources of the ancient world after british nazism has destroyed as much as they could - while running a war against the intellectuals. It may be urgent with a renovation of the status and role of England.

I came to Vienna in 2003 and stayed for a few days to see if I could find a place to live. I responded to an ad in a newspaper, first a few calls which were not answered, before in the afternoon somebody answered and I got an appointment. It was a flat over the kenyan consulate and the houseletter reminded me too much about Marit Lobben. I eventually did not take the flat but travelled on before I returned in 2004. 'Over the kenyan consulate' is probably 'uterus' - like the sperm in the myth of Holst when the 'common friend' steps out of the cupboard. When I left Athens for Venice, I had to store my computer and books in Athens and later went down to get them. It turned out that the computer did not function when I got it here - the 'motherboard' was out of order. 'Com-p-uter' = 'came on uter-us' could have meant that the beginning here was like in Vienna if the computer had been sabotaged in Athens, in which case it could have been about 'Jörg Haider'. I believe that the storage in Athens should have been safe, though, in spite of some 'signals' (the owner came and 'looked over' the computer screens to the employees when I stood there - probably a coincidence). In the mean time, I had sent an email (and received in return on an internet cafe an automatic opening of 'Adobe Acrobat' when I tried to log on to email, I think it was, but I don't know who returned it) to 'Frank Tveor Nordensten' (schoolmate from Frydenberg) whose name resembles 'Anne Frank Stagbok' = 'Anne Frank Sdiary' = 'anne frank history' = 'arme fran kisteri' (arver han kisten?) = brystfolderen vs. brystnåleren = frankert ve onor-dunsten (cp. 'Kirsten Dunst') = stamped by the honor-odour. There was a 'shoe bomber' in an airplane some time ago who had hidden some emergency 'pulver' in his shoes and was stopped when he folded down to release it. 'Shoob om ber' = 'forlatelse' = 'fold double' = A4 paper in the stamped envelope. Nordensten once (late seventies) was in my ground-floor work-space room in the 'topographic' Voldgaten 1 with a ('typographic') partwriting job - Egil Hovland from Glemmen church had also been there - and used the word 'kotyme' (in a natural context, though). It could be that place which is indexed in MLR January 2009. ('Egg i lovland' could be about my TEQ 1-15: Certainly if there is anybody in the world who has NO RIGHTS to my book, it is british institutions: They are not even legal in the european community, and it would not make them more legal to represent themselves in 'cigar' symbolism with e.g. the concept of 'Jean Bollack'). Around 1986, probably, when I was in Fredrikstad for several months, I visited him in his home on Christianslund (mirror-symmetric around Kniple to Glemmen Gravlund, not Gamle Glemmen Gravlund, though, but rather the 'Novo') and briefly met his wife in a corridor. By folding the late seventies over to 1986 and adding the 'folding' meaning of the name of the place, one gets something like this - could be it could resemble elements of the story of Holst. Could it have been that Nordensten - or Hovland - did not say thanks for the job I did for him in the late seventies, or that I - folded over - did not say thanks for the visit in his home? Should one put the thanks in an envelope and post it after having put a stamp on the rectangular shape - with or without redundancy hole in the matrix? But the shoe bomber would have been an all too obvious hint if that were the story - it must be more discreet than that. Once in the offices of NMI in Oslo I said no thanks to a lift in his Citroen. 'Takk for sist' can also mean 'thanks for Sisson'. Could have been such reasons. Could have been due to such pantalons and good-pianist Ivo Pogorelich (= 'I was in kindergarden'?), the combination of which could have invoked associations to 'serifs'. A 'thanks for the visit in your home' with fold-over ('bryst-folderen' is then kneecaps of 'Ognisanti') could then have been about the search for a cigar: 'Giovanni Novo'? He played a tape with some of his own music. But clearly these are my own associations and I cannot blame him for these.

But clearly if the story is something like this - not Nordensten but in general - that one attempts to elicit a 'kotyme' speech act by way of nearly any means - the news of a shoe bomber only one among many, could be Manhattan 2001 could have been another - then it could be about my situation on the background of Biafra, Baader-Meinhof, Warszaw, Rwanda etc when I am trying to make people understand that they have to help me and it is impossible for me to obtain anything with such an enormous pressure on my person - and think of what political profit one can obtain by rejecting me while pronouncing a stance against terror. If I try to make people understand they may believe that it is Baader-Meinhof or Adolf Hitler who try to establish contact with them. In particular if that contact leads only to a bombing of Lebanon, it is difficult to understand. And how important it is that e.g. the state of Israel does not abuse this relation to me for consolidating the impression that England was not involved in the holocaust. In this situation, I have to elicit the 'speech-act'-similar response from other people that they have to understand me in spite of resistance which the propaganda whips up in their souls. Could be this is 'the power of the cigar'.

This sort of problem could be a 'nynorsk order': 'Please say thanks' articulated via gigantissimo intrigues. It is understandable only on basis of the integrity and authenticity of the person. Clearly one cannot say 'thanks for the visit in your home' if the home is not authentically the person's if the person is another and carries cigar and the name on the ownership document is false - then it would have to be 'thanks for the visit in the other person's home'. Then one cannot say thanks, of course. Nor can one follow order or take any other speech act from a non-authentic 'cigar' without being made a fool of if the original has the authority but the copy has not. That is the power of the cigar - that it is powerful only as long as it is hidden. I have no reason to believe that Frank Tveor Nordensten is a secret agent or cigar-man - but his name means something like such a secret-service 'cigar' - a little box with counterhooks containing some words stored in the colon. MLR January 1936 title 5. "James Thomson: His translations of Heine. By G.A.Black" could mean such a "gjemmes i homsen: his translations of haiene. By 'Jean Bollack'". Bollack was 'in Freunchschaft verbunden' to Celan - could be a common friend had introduced the one to the other, like Enzensberger introduced Sachs to the Holmqvists. And such bonds by 'common friendship' requires that one retains a polite respect when it comes to obligations of a welcoming attitude towards the common friend - as long as one's own psyche and organism can take the pressure, of course.

There are also the elements of hebrew Exodus 20,4 in the name, the key to the identity-conversion of Hitler, plus the 'Minotaurus' ('noter og frankenstein') in the converted form of 'Modern Language Review'. Which means that if his name also means 'the genetics of Nelly Sachs', there is the 'Hitler-conversion' complex present. This could have been a part of the story around Lockerbie when one of the two Ore (Language-related) I knew came into the office in Easter: The other Ore is a 'Modern-ist' and together this 'tve-Or' (cp. 'Oredalsaasen' 1970) could make for some counterhooks. If in addition 'diesen Tag' was about the day when Sachs was in Molde in 1963 or Celan in Odda in 1960, the complex could be about an attempt to make me believe that Sachs' genetics is Hitler's genetics. Or even more that Hitler is me. Could it be about constructing an 'ad-old feetler'?

Clearly if the name is 'cigar', then a visit in his home could be similarly felt as quite an insult, even if he had invited to it himself. A 'stag' is that sort of 'roddy' structure which one also can put into the mouth of a crocodile - and hence a 'cigar' is also a sort of 'stagbok'. The attacker in Bratislava approached me with a lifted finger while I turned away and tried to leave when he followed after me and hit me in my back. He could have been a potential variant of this insult as a foldover from Voldgaten 1. It was after I had been in the lift with a neighbour for probably the first time. I once (second half of the sixties) hit Vibeke Gröver in her back after she had teased me with a guitar (not 'cigar') when I tried to read.

Gröver/'Mengele' told me in probably Molde (before 1970) that a professor at the university where he had studied had shown the students a copy of a stomach - he said it was from a man who had drunk so much 'shell-lac' that it had dried in his belly and he had died and one could take out a perfect cast of it. Clearly this would be an intuitive 'Jean Bowel-lac' as a sort of 'cigar' hidden inside the abdomen. Then it could be important to notice that I am not 'Jean Bollack', in case the project could have been to make essential people believe so. In particular, I do not plan a 'Brudermord'.

For the concept of 'Franc-hise' (see below), there is the apparent 'Frank-heis' in the name if the cigar is 'rowing' upwards by way of the 'oars', or at least when it is inserted into position at the brink of the bottom, at 'Brinken' in 'Oslo'. Who was there really, that Christmas 1957? Does my name mean 'cigar'? Could be it means 'cigar' in the moment of insertion - or even in the process of moving upwards from the brink of the anus into the colon: 'J on b jörne' is the 'J' or 'cigar' resting on the 'kant' of insertion, while 'J on b jarne' could be the 'sarxy' name inside the container, or the container itself, such as in the coffins - while they are still 'overburied'. (In fact the room-letter in Bern surprised me with pronouncing the name 'Björn' with norwegian accent). The fine 'philological difference' could then be about 'Coleridge as a philologist', hence 'Sarxen-haüsen' (J-flesh filled into the log-space) - a Leif i Logsby = Leif (Stene?) i Plankebyen = Leif Stene Johansen in Fredrikstad? But this could be precisely the meaning of the name 'Arne Treholt'. The venetian 'Vaporetto' is a 'planke-by': One stands on a wooden structure over the seawater. Could 'Arne Treholt' have been about getting my person off the 'Sachsenhausen' links of Leif Stene Johansen to Nelly Sachs?

The whole complex seems to be contained in MLR April 1936 which thereby could be seen to be telling of 'the power of the cigar', or even 'the insertion of the cigar', telling also of the name-relation of me to Leif Stene Johansen, cp. the change of PM in England in 2006. But that could mean that the current situation in England is about just such a 'Sachsenhausen' - which then could be about Bergsundsstrand on Söder - or the topographic isomorphism on Zattere or Voldgaten 1 in the Old Town and possibly elsewhere. I don't know what happened with Nono in 1990. In principle, the titles of MLR January 2009 could have indexed this attacker in Bratislava.

MLR is published by 'Modern Humanities Research Association' which could mean just that 'moment of insertion of the cigar'. Which again - if Leif Stene Johansen related to John F.Kennedy in some way or other, such as even MLR October 1963 could indicate - could suggest some sort of british interests in the Kennedy aspects of the US democrats.

This whole sort of logic - all that 'on the kant' and 'metal container with a code inside' and 'Freundschaft verbunden' and all this logic is in itself a sort of 'cigar': One postpones as long as one can the understanding of these mechanisms since it is unpleasant to understand them and they are hard to get out again as soon as one have got them in. It is not the right way to understand other people and so forth. It means 'the failure of administrative logic'. The power of it is that people do not want it. Wrong sort of power, that means.

Is Beatles' 'Magical mystery tour' from 1967 about the venetian L and K and the serifs with lift? Even Luigi Nono? And even speech acts ('Roll up...')?

It is possible that all these cigar-themes encircle the four 'serif' churches of Venice with the 'Malvasia Vecchia' gingersnap in the centre for constructing the 'franc-hise lift' from Paris to London, cp. the lift of the gingersnap up to the ceiling of San Pantalon. Abuse of the mystery in Formosa, that means. Abuse abuse abuse is the name of all that. The age of exploitation must come to an end. People do not want it. The abusers are as damaged as the victims, their culture as shallow as the paper they write on. And so I had to write this frank book in order to try and stop the exploitation. Anne Frank Stagbok. Frank Tveor Nord-Ost-en? 0-1 by matrix redundancy.

The relation between my name and the name of Nordensten could resemble an administrative structure for articulating through Nordensten the ideas articulated in me. In principle, one could think of this as the politics of England when they try to be the new Jews of Europe - the ones who were exterminated in the holocaust - the poetic logic of the mid 19th century. There were in fact three composers in Fredrikstad whose names resembled this complex - Trygve Madsen in 1971-72 possibly even 73, Frank Tveor Nordensten at high school times 73-74 (I only knew who he was but I don't think we even greeted in those days), Ragnar Söderlind (cp. Thoursie and Sachs 1963) 1977-78. Could be this could be due to the semantic relevance of 'composing' with the idea of 'sarxen-housing' in a coffin. If Thoursie stood next to Sachs in Parkveien, and if he represents the intestine wall, she would represent the 'cigar'. And 'T-ryg-ve Mad-sen trivially can mean something like 'intestine wall'. One notices also the form 'rygve merche' as relevant to the story from the beginning of Talmud Berachos (the first tractate of the Talmud) of the Arab merchant who prayed 'wrong way' ('No-r-way'?) behind the synagogue and was murdered by Elijah (by his sword) because he thought it was a Jew. That could suggest that the Arab merchant represents the intestine wall - cp. the attack on Manhattan 2001 allegedly by Osama bin Laden.

Clearly 'cigar' is not really the story - it would rather be about something which does not enter into the metabolism in the ordinary way.

The converse of 'Frank Tveor Nordensten' could be something like 'Leif Monrad Sörensen' (see MLR April 1967 title #6) - or simply 'Morten Sörlie'. Which means something like 'the death of Celan'. Clearly if Nordensten should mean my genetics, it could mean that I would be the 'copy' possibly even with 'cigar' and consequently that I should have been a secret agent: A walking ad for Hitler.

'Charles Jasper Sisson' was editor of MLR and his name could be seen to be about just such a phenomenon: A 'charles' of the 'diaspora' leaving the 'sisten' = 'tag' (the game) on somebody else. Cp. also 'drab-lös' of the 'ho-drab-scheulige'. 'Takk for sist[en]' ('thanks for our last meeting') is to say thanks for something received, something socio-psychological.

Sachs was reportedly surprised about Pergament's opera music to her 'Eli'. Why? This way of inspiring other people by leaving an inspirational 'sisten' to them is exactly how a non-exploitative society should have been, and the idea of England running off with the jewish cultural traditions by way of 'sisten' is only a pretext for their attempt to block such communications between people. It is the right thing to be inspiring for other people's work when only they understand it and do not exploit the phenomenon. But exploitation makes this more and more difficult and today there is little left of the former cultural life. Where is the idealist publisher today? There is soon only one type of books published in the world and all the english-language ones have their seat in London, and an inspiring book is typically not published but exploited by the publisher for pumping out other 'similar' books untill it is burnt out. Moses Pergament's music is precisely that sort of inspiring art. Sachs' response to his 'Eli' is likely to be an attempt to rescue the last parts of this resource - before it is all pumped over the sea to England. She wrote in her 24.3.59 letter to Johannes Edfeldt, Rönninge, that she had expected something like Nono's background choir to the reading of letters from nazi camp prisoners. One notices 'Johannes Edfeldt' = 'Johannes Sædfelt' ['Johannes Sperm-fallen/field'] = 'Johannes [s]Hahn', and 'Rönninge' indeed means that old house ('rönne') of Rekustad where there was a flooding. ('Lekk va lesa' could mean that the tap had been opened by somebody who came to read the electric metre). As such, the mention of Nono in that letter could have been a background of his death or the murder of him on 8 May 1990 - as a political act from England. And then the theme could in principle have been this phenomenon of a culture of inspiration which is not based on exploitation.

I hereby thank Nordensten for the visit in his home, which does not mean that I say thanks for a visit in my colon or under the top lid of my skull or for treatment with chemicals of dubious character such as MLR April 1957 could be telling of, or other forms of 'lift'. I have no reason to believe that Nordensten is anything but a normal person from Fredrikstad. I should also, beyond these puzzling coincidences, talk well about his friendliness and interesting music. I am sure it wasn't him who walked by on that place. Could have been his 'shadow', though.

Would there have been a 'bautastein' in the zwischenrole? There are another three names of some relevance (for example for that 1967 Beatles data) which leave a redundant pattern as the fourth: Pia Fr., Nina Fr., Pia G. and what could be 'nynorsk order' (as for the british order to establish Auschwitz). But these are likely to be as uninvolved as I am and probably serve as ad hoc reference points to the four churches to make it possible to implement the concepts in administration without the details of Venice. What could be the 'nynorsk order'? I recall from Volda 1964-65 the emphatic folk expression - a sort of semi-swearing - 'orre heise det!' or 'året heise det'. The 'år' = 'year' in question could be 'MDLVI' = '1556' of San Trovaso which thereby 'lifts it up' = 'heise det' on the Formosa side. But the exclamation is not an order unless it is seen as an order to the 'spirits' to lift things up. Administrative governmental authority to the spiritual-angelic realm by way of 'cigar power'? This would be too tragic if it were the dream of all this politics. But of course it would not be the real purpose - it would be only another secret pretext for more mass murder. If that were not the purpose of it, clearly the whole program would have been published in all details.

'MDLVI' = Mannskapet Dansk-ape Landskapet Vi-andskapet/egnskapet. Even 'Fransk Ape'? 'Modern Language Review': The title of this periodical reduces somewhat to these formulas which could have their origins in a Scriblerus invention of the 'vik-ings' in the sense of the [female] opening between the two horns on top of their head and hence 'ekt[e]skapet' = 'the marriage' is the key to the nazi mysteries. For my role, that means the 'Oktogon' (= 'Oklahoma'/'Ognisanti') project as founded in the norwegian pride of a glorious past. Cp. the phenomena of 'franc-hise' (the 'AIDSHIV lift') and 'suffr-a-gettes': 'Take that' (e.g. Ronald Reagan) = 'taket hat' = Sachsenhausen 1936 / Manhattan 2001. By 'egnskapet/egtskapet' (which could be the contents of the 'frau Röver' construction with 'Aktion Ragna/Regna/Reinhard') the 'taket hat' = 'naken han' ('naked male') = 'the hand-le' = 'the Heydrich' - while the difference in 'handle/heydrich' comes down to 'anle/Conolly' vs 'eyri/Eire' = 'Ireland' (the people of Iceland/Ireland/Israel) plus a 'ch' = 'dr' for the western hijacking of Lenin's poetic revolution. Flegtskapet, slektskapet.

A study of the titles of MLR July 1936 and 1937, the time of opening of Sachsenhausen and Buchenwald, could suggest a construction of a genetic sister of mine relating by Downing-Street-10 representation to a murder of me - with that standard secret-service 'royal' fantasy of sawing up the 'Dachau' skull and forking the brains right out ('Medici' style). I do hope the concept of 'Jean Bollack' does not plan to murder a brother of mine in order to pretend that this 'concept' is me for the 'double fold' of being the representation of Downing Street 10 through the concept of 'Brudermord'.

Cigar, metabolism, terrorism. British concepts of power seem a little outdated - Brudermord, Fadermord, Modermord, forking out of the brains... Gloomy world that british one.

A note on the bombing of Gaza and MLR January 2009

"The logic of the clerk's tale" from MLR January 2009 recurs in January 1986 which seems to contain cues to Olof Palme, Chernobyl and one could even read Ehud Olmert in there. The basis for this is in the photo of Mengele on the ramp of Auschwitz with the hooded man next to him walking with a heavy gait towards some jews. It was in 1987-1988 that I heard the expression 'det tungt fremvraltende hornkveg' as a parody on Homer. 'A hood olm-ert' is a good description of the person on the ramp. Cp. 'Lobsang Rampa' who was the author (rumours told that it was a pseudonym for a plumber from Liverpool) of the book 'The third eye' allegedly from Tibet. ('Lovsang rompa' = 'hymn from the bottom', while 'lobe-sang rampa' could be more about the authorship to the third eye of the Auschwitz ramp - which means the third person counted from the left = Gröver-Mengele?). In fact 3-4 cameras have been put up around the place I have lived since July 2008: First there was one private surveillance camera, as far as I could see, then suddenly I discovered a twin camera spotting both ways along the housewall, and then a third camera came up very shortly before 1 May: It could be 'the third eye' of Gröver/'Mengele' - possibly with a reflex even in the film 'Stalker'. But this could be the first title in Jan 1986 - here the two first:

1. Christine de Pizan and the so-called style clergial. By J.D.Burnley
2. The heavenly Jerusalem in Pearl. By Rosalind Field

While the second of these could be Olof Palme, about the palms on the road when Jesus rides into Jerusalem, the way could even be recognized as relevant to Olmert if that is the indexation in title 1. 'Christine' is then about the ramp of St.Peter, while 'de Pizan' could be about the jewish correlate in 'biting off the foreskin' as could be the 'style clergial' of the old rabbi - and Gröver/'Mengele' told me in Molde that the old rabbi who used to do the circumcision was tuberculosis-infested. 'E hud' could then mean '[electric] skin', as if the 'foreskin' of either gender should have been mutilated in infancy with electric shock. 'Old-mert' could then be the tuberculosis of the old rabbi. It would have been the down-burning of the nuclear reactor in Chernobyl in April 1986 which links this to the name 'Burnley'. 'Chernobyl' relates to 'Jerusalem' approximately such as 'Ehud Olmert' relates to 'Ehud Natron' or even 'Ehud Ant[r]on', in which case Ehud Barak/Abrak ('a dabra' = 'Dröbak'?) could add to it for a 'magic government'. I don't know if the iranian uranium enrichment program adds fuel to such a construction.

MLR April 1986 seems to contain some cues to such a reading by the first title: "Providential justice and english comedy 1660-1700: A review of the external evidence. By Derek Hughes". If the 'pro---is' is the 'external evidence', a 're-view' of the inbetween syllables 'vid-en-chel just' could allow for some 'e-just chel-en-vid' or 'Ejud Czernowitz' (Paul Pessach Ancel was a 'Jud' from Czernowitz), and the 'witz' could be read from the 'english comedy'. Would 'Derek Hughes' be a 'Sherlock Holmes' (Lockerbie!) in 'Mossad'? 40 years from 1986 takes it to 2026, which is still some time to go, but the mid point is 2006 when Olmert took over after Sharon and ran a war or at least bombing campaign against Lebanon in the summer - with some apparent links to me via the end of 2005 and those things, which perhaps could be recognized in a '1666' with the Great Fire of London (starting in 'Pudding Street'), and Downing Street 10 seems to be so called after George Downing who was minister of finance in 1667 (Microsoft Encarta). The second title in April 1986 is "The meaning of vraisemblance in french classical theory. By Janet Morgan" which perhaps could be telling of 'Ariel Sharon' in the french word? The third title could be telling of a Kennedy link to Chappaquiddick 1969: "Chappuzeau and the Orateur - a question of accuracy. By William Brooks". That Chappaquiddick 1969 could be seen as related to me via the Aure-Osen story and the death or (as suggested by the car number in Aure-Osen) murder of Charles de Gaulle in 1970. A coup?

In short, if the israeli government should be representing the british government in the attack on Gaza in Christmas 2008, the idea that it could be related to my discovery - written on my computer - in november 2008 is not uninteresting. The attack on Gaza was unfortunate for my own book and theory - if politics tries to create the impression that the attack could have served the interests of me as a secret agent that could be to swap roles. I am not an agent and the attack was not in my interest.

The idea could have been that a younger sister of mine was mutilated by such electrics while a 'babysitter' masturbated and let the el-shock go in the infant's vagina in the moment of his ejaculation. That would have made the 'nuclear reactor' electric, and it could have added to the idea of 'platonic genetics' as a feeling of terror. When the Jan 2009 issue contains the same reference to a 'logic of the clerk's tale' (his 'tail' = his 'Schwanz'), and it clearly points towards Zattere, one could think of this as a 'Bermuda triangle' (with San Trovaso and Ognisanti) which thereby (via Tælavåg and Telavi and Telekhany) points to Tel Aviv - and hence 'tele'-impact on the female gender. Why should that have been? I made my discovery on 'The Dreamer' and its relation to TEQ in November - and then the October 2008 issue was already printed and distributed. This January 2009 would have been the first chance to capture this - and if the attack on Gaza in Christmas 2008 were for just such hijacking purposes, the joint reference to MLR 1986 could be telling of a british project - in particular if the idea of the attack came from Olmert. 'Nynorsk order' could even have been the concept in this MLR January 2009 in 'Whispering to the converted'. 'Perversion of time' would be backwards effect of the January 2009 towards november 2008. 'Christine de Pizan' is even mentioned again in the fourth title - along with the 'Fortuny' of Giudecca pointing towards Zattere. "You can put up a homepage", said the 'clerk', and of course there could have been microphones around. That could be what even the israeli embassy in Berlin meant to say in 2004.

There seems to be a ferry zipping back and forth between Dröbak (not 'bröd-akk') and Horten (not 'horen'), across 'Oslofjorden' = 'Olof på jorden' = 'Olof on the earth'.

The british government is by the evidence in MLR not legal according to international conventions and it should as such not be recognized by the international community. There must have been a coup there a century ago or something like that - and the people of England has not yet discovered it! That is a scandal. The international community must do what they can to tell them about it - so that they can get the chance to re-establish a legal government. As it goes for the time being, there is an enormous damage made on the international community by the terror-and-fraud programs launched via MLR.

It was after the british (announced in advance in MLR) murder of Benazir Bhutto that I found that I had to move out of Ehamgasse 23, and when I later found that the Finanzierungsbeitrag I had paid to ÖVW was not repaid to me, one can today make the conclusion that it could have been the very purpose with the murder of 'Benazir Bhutto' = 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' . But that means a british responsibility claim (in MLR) on the absence of the repayment to me, and if the program obtains that "not any state power of Austria shall be able to effectuate the repayment of the Finanzierungsbeitrag", it would mean that England controls the state power of Austria. It would represent a sort of 'Anschluss'. Jörg Haider (whose death also seems to have been announced in advance in MLR) and Thomas Klestil are names which certainly add weight to this assumption of control of state power via the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' - and both of them died in the immediate context of the registration of my new address:

Fin-[h]an-sier-[t]ag = fin han ser ut = Klestil, for which reason 'Thomas' was murdered
Runk-spy-[d] = Jörg Haider a spy, hence murdered by the state[s]

This adds to 'Benazir Bhutto' ('Un-Klag'?) for the political role of the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag'. In short, why is this not in the newspaper - an article which tells that 1) Thomas Klestil and 2) Jörg Haider and indeed even 3) Benazir Bhutto and why is that 'Finanzierungsbeitrag' not sent? Or is it supposed to mean that it is sent already 2-3 times? Then there is a coup going on, which should be interesting for a newspaper.

The conclusion could be that England plans to start the 'Black Sea Loop' over Vienna and wants to control the intersection with the axis Vilnius-Vienna-Venice and represents this control with the control of the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag', which is what lends much significational power - linked to England - to the Ehamgasse complex.

I had been to Vienna and appointed with a short-term roomlet place from 1 July 2004 and when I returned on that day to start searching for a flat I pressed the doorphone button and a voice told me to wait a little - there were 'zwei S[t]erben' who would take a little time.

The theory that Olmert is an agent for England - a closer analysis of MLR January/April 1986

MLR January 1986

1. Christine de Pizan and the so-called Style Clergial. By J.D.Burnley
2. The heavenly Jerusalem in Pearl. By Rosalind Field
3. Voices of alienation: The moral significance of Marston's satiric strategy. By R.C.Horne
4. Two notes on Hamlet: 11.2.357-58; 111.1.121-31. By G.Blakemore Evans
5. Clio's 'cabinet': Metaphorical edifices in Ronsard's 'Hymnes' of 1555-1556. By John O'Brien
6. 'They have their exits and their entrances': Stage and speech in Corneille's drama. By H.T.Barnwell
7. A better country: Rétif's later utopias. By Peter Wagstaff
8. On the structure, imagery, and significance of 'Vida retirada'. By D.Gareth Walters
9. El obsceno pájaro de la noche: The novelist as victim. By Pamela Bacarisse
10. Lucretius in eighteenth-century Germany. With a commentary on Goethes 'Metamorphose der Tiere'. By H.B.Nisbet
11. Schiller's fragment 'Tragödie und Komödie'. By Lesley Sharpe
12. The texts of 'volkstümliche Lieder': Alterations and distortions. By J.W.Smeed
13. Problems of socialist historiography: The example of Stefan Heym's The king David report. By Peter Hutchinson
14. Dostoyevsky's Notes from a dead house: The poetics of the introductory paragraph. By Lewis Bagby

The structure seems to be as mirror-symmetric as April 1957:

1/14: The ritual of jewish circumcision as transformed into a christian communion seems to be the theme. In Molde in the second half of the sixties, I asked Gröver/'Mengele' what circumcision ('omskjæring') is and he said: "It is when an old tuberculosis-infested jewish priest bites the foreskin off a young boy". We were in front of the bookshelf when he said it, I think he was in the process of walking into the entrance hall. Ragna Gröver was also present, as far as I remember. For 14, there was the situation when only Vibeke Gröver and I were at home and we were passing precisely the same place when the house let off a 'knacking' sound, and I pretended to be scared and said: "What was that?" and she harassed me for my lack of courage. (Vida retirada?) Certainly a microphone could have tapped the scene and the british secret service could have recognized this as the theme of cannibalism. The foreskin swallowed and here it answers. Rudjord told me about his unforgettable trip to Torshavn with a ferry (called 'Smyrild') which had been going on Limfjorden but had been put out of traffic because it could not take the sea there. It could relate to the ferry of Dröbak-Horten on Oslofjorden = Olof po jorden. Hence Limp-jorden, such as John W.Hinckley etc. Limfjorden, Oslofjorden, Limbless, Oslobless = os-lob-less = hat-brekking. 'Limfjorden' constitutes a sort of bag on the character of Denmark on the map, and then the entrance to the waterway east of Aalborg is even called 'Hals' = 'Throat'. This decapitation symbolism could be contained in 'Bagby' (= 'to offer a bag' = at 'Hals', 'Egense', 'Skellet') and the 'style clergial' of Christine de Pizan. Hence the concept could be e.g. 11 September 2001 as 'breaking' the 'Manhattan'. There is an island on Limfjorden called 'Mors' = 'death', 'mother's', which could correlate with 'Sons' = 'sounds' - e.g. when the 'os' breaks. I refer also to the film "Stalker" by Tarkowsky - for example around 01:11:00 - the professor with a knitted cap and rucksack is reminscent of Denmark on the map. Even a little reminiscent of Ehud Olmert? The three men in the 'zone' could even be seen as a sort of 'troika'. At 1:50 he telephones to the 'ninth labor' (= 'John Gröver') and tells him the two key phrases 'the old building, the fourth bunker'. The film suggests that this was what Celan could have told Gröver/'Mengele' from a telephone box outside the house - and Gröver/'Mengele' would have let me out. It would have been de Gaulle's administration who had given him this and told him that 'then he lets him out' - could be that is where he did experiments in Auschwitz he did not know could be proven, or for which he could get a further sentence in absentia. If so, the scene in the film at 1:50 is Celan calling in to Gröver/'Mengele' with what the latter would have called 'telephone terror' - and this could have been the background of the telephone terror 1986-88 - terror against me which would have left me in the position of Gröver/'Mengele' in 1960 - and the other side in the role of Celan from Czernowitz. This started after PAS had passed away on 7 August 1986, and after the Waldheim case had been launched - which would provide strong international attention to Austria and furthermore index me by the 'wald-heim' period in the forest 1983-84. When the telephone terror ended in 1988, there followed the Lockerbie bombing which I have traced to the story with the dog PAN in front of the garage in Labraaten 58 in the early seventies. The background of this dog PAN for the bombing of the PAN AM 103A could have been in MLR January 1961 (see above) - the first issue after Celan's visit to Odda.

2/13: Jesus riding into Jerusalem, palm leafs on the ground. The murder of Olof Palme on 28 February 1986. If 'Pearl' is read in 'vulgata' style P = L there is the name Rosalind Field = Rosa-Pin Field, which could be about me putting a little twig inbetween the buttocks of neighbour boy Erik in Molde in 1963: It was a sunny day and people went around without clothes and I tried to tell him something. Could be he was too naive about something. 'Nur Erik' in Sachs' letter to Borchers of 1963, the mystery symbol. This would also be the theme in the sense of 'king david re-port' and Stefarn Heim is the situation with the question about circumcision.

3/12: 1963 was also the year when my foreskin could no longer be drawn back and that was probably after I had met Sachs and her poem "So steigt der Berg" had been printed and the 'error' not withdrawn. It had been 'Es steigt der Berg' in the 1961 letter to Celan and in the print it had gone out as 'So steigt der Berg' and 'it was not withdrawn'. 'After it had been printed it could no longer be withdrawn', (cp. Tarkowsky's 'Mirror'). Which is when my foreskin could no longer be withdrawn - and one could take the SO-ES story to be about an 'SOS' from me, as would have been the administrative interpretation (the real interpretation is somewhat different). The 'smegma' (a word used by Fjellheim) under the foreskin would then be the theme of title 3.

4/11: In Aure-Osen: "What is 'kaudervelsk'?" In Björnstjerne Björnsonsvei 7: "What is 'circumcision'?" These would have been 'two notes on Hamlet'. When pronounced by G.Blakemore Evans, it would have been the smegma pronouncing them - telling that it 'mo revans' - it must be 'torn offen', cp. the hood on the forwards-moving man in the photo from Auschwitz. For Schiller's fragment 'Tragödie und Komödie'. By Lesley Sharpe, it would be about the 'smegma' under the foreskin which must be torn offen and the bottom of mine which Hitler thought had to be 'torn offen' in 1957. The two needs are united as a shared theme of the two voices of Hamlet, and the voice is shifted over onto Hitler. The theme of 'torn offen' would be recognized in 'Tårnåsen' where I lived in 1986 and wherefrom I was 'pælma ut' at the time of the murder of Palme.

5/10: This seems to be the theme of the name-change story: Gröver/'Mengele' showing me, on the same place before the bookshelf, the letter from a man in northern Norway who wanted to take the name Gröver. He asked me what I thought about it: I looked at the letter and said that of course he should get the permission. Gröver/'Mengele' then put the letter back in the bookshelf, on top of some books. On the same place I had once looked at a 'verboten' book about medicinal pathologism - and seen a horrendous photo of a throat cut nearly off. I pushed the book back again in the shelf and regretted that I had seen it. It is likely that it was the suggestions from me of a permission to 'use the name' - which for my name could be taken to include the 'jarnegg' part of it - which was used in the context of the intestine operation on Sachs in 1969. And this again could have been lifted over onto the role of Aulie's injections in 1970-71. 'Hymen' is norwegian for the virginal membrane and the opposite of the male foreskin, hence the Hitler interpretation. A 'Brie' district outside Paris could have been the location of mistreatment of Celan in 1970. Title 10 = Zhivago? There is the idea around that I was served a slice of bread with excrement mashed into the liver paste, for example as punishment after Celan's visit, but I cannot remember it and don't know where the idea would have come from. 'Mashed foetus'? 'Skiva-go' means 'the breadslice good'. 'Loo-cretius' could in principle have been such a story from Odda, while the '18th-century Germany' could have been about the dish I was served in 1975 containing strips of meat in brown sauce. I never got a reason to believe that it contained human flesh. Besh/flesh could have been the logic on the background of the nazi possession with intestines and metabolism.

6/9: This again could be recognized in the entrance and exit theme, including the meeting in Parkveien if that was on my way to kindergarden = Barnwell. Sachs could have used my name including 'Bjarne'. The 'bacalao' of title 9.

7/8: Likely to be about 'Fahrt ins Staublose' = 'Fahrkarte Stockholm' (with the book "Sternverdunkelung" shown me by Celan squatting = 'Wagstaff' at the corner to the house) and 'Fadensonnen' = 'Fahrkarte Paris/onnen'. 'Va de en sonn en' = 'was it like this', on the 'backdrawing' = 'dröbak' of the foreskin? I recall a situation from Odda when I and another two boys inspected the phenomenon of our drawn-back penis foreskins behind a garage and so I know it was normal in Odda, up to 1962. Why do I remember it? Could there have been some surveillance or one of the others had reported it - and then it was a piece of 'secret information' in the administration? Or was it close to the place where Celan had been - and that is why it was recorded by somebody? 'Fahrkarte Penis-onnen' could have been the contents of the title #8.

Conclusion: A turnaround of the role of mine relative to Sachs/Celan based on what is known to secret service about the meetings. The story from 'Tårnåsen' with the throw-out at the time of Palme. 'Kornmoveien' = 'Ham-let', 'Corneille', title 4 T-262 and Aktion Reinhard, having been a big in 'accountancy' = 1111..., coup of Aure-Osen.

In short, if this issue and the April one were about launching Olmert as agent for England, it would have been about launching him in my role relative to the jewish-genetic diaspora. Then 'Ehud' would have been about the 'for-hud' = 'foreskin', while the 'e' could have been about the electric mistreatment of a genetic sister. 'Old-mert' would then mean these elements of turning front orifice into back, the 'smegma' into Hitler's sperm in my bottom in 1957, and so forth. 'E hu doll married' = 'a doll fitler', meeting the reverse 'tremolo du-he'. The meeting of the sexes. The authorship of Sachs/Celan would then mean 'Fahrkarte onnen' = 'ticket in spirit' which could serve to turn the 'anti-spiritism' of this 'onnen' into the AIDSHIV lift from Paris to London.

Ragna Gröver worked for a while part time in Moss in the second half of the seventies, but I don't know if she continued after the car accident in Oslo in 1981. Fredrikstad-Moss is a distance of 30 km which in skiing is called 'tremila'. In 1986 I took the train from Fredrikstad to Oslo and met LSJ on the station. Apparently Ragna Gröver (some times a comment is given ('greetings from Ragna') has occasionally been putting in some 2-300 euros on my bank account under my name in the years after 2001.

'Chernobyl' puts a 'byl' for the 'witz' of 'Czernowitz'. This 'byl' could be recognized in hebrew as a ball-shaped 'lump' - not really 'limp' unless the ball is the joint of the hip - and if it is the head of joint, there adds naturally to this the concept of 'boulwutis' = 'bouletes', a greek loanword meaning 'senator' or 'councilman'. The basic greek form is the 'boul-' which means the 'will'. This is the first entry of the MLR October 1920 issue for the birth of Celan - and one adds to it the communication from Bengt Holmqvist to Celan of 'postkakanisch Vidimierung'. In short, 'Chernobyl' in this sense of it means a 'Celan' type as the head of the parliament, and a coup of the head in the form of Ariel Sharon in early 2006 would have given the story a rooting in just this Chernobyl of April 1986. There is also the flavour of a 'stand' with balls and hence Stonehenge for Stortinget, the norwegian parliament. This serves to delimit the reference to something which could be the Knesset and the israeli government. But then 'os-lob-less' seems to be the concept. The form 'from planks to planks' of MLR early 2009 could be a borrowing from my computer of the spring 2008. It is a poetic analysis of the concept 'from harbour to harbour' - which then is stolen from my computer and turned into pure evil, probably for turning it against myself. 'Brown hawked silly in the field...'?

That sort of thinking is the world of moden politics. When the research council is turned into a tool for barbarous politics, that could be for only the purpose of the 'foreskin' council. The people must storm the secret archives and publish all details of the nazi program. There is nothing left of the rationality and reason in it.

MLR April 1986

1. Providential justice and english comedy 1660-1700: A review of the external evidence. By Derek Hughes
2. The meanings of vraisemblance in french classical theory. By Janet Morgan
3. Chappuzeau and the orateur - a question of accuracy. By William Brooks
4. Beckett's monologues: The context and conditions of representation. By Patrick O'Donovan
5. Dante and the middle ages in neo-classical and romantic criticism. By C.P.Brand
6. Calderón as tragedian: The case of Las tres justicias en una. By M.Gordon
7. Carlos Fuentes as philosopher of tragedy. By Gloria Durán
8. The reception of Hartmann's works: Listening, reading, or both? By D.H.Green
9. History can restore naivity to the sentimental: Schiller's letters on Wallenstein. By Jill Berman
10. Translation and exegesis in Hölderlin. By David Constantine
11. Tolstoy, Laclos, and the libertine. By Helena Goscilo

A mirror-symmetric reading can be suggestive even here:

1/11: 'Helena go o skylde ho' = to clean the cloth under running water. Cp. the death of 'Jörg Haider' as the opposite of the meaning of his name, hence something like 'go o skylde ho', in which case 'Helena' could be alarming. 'Skylde' means both to rinse and to have a debt, as for the 'Finanzierungsbeitrag'. The mirror case is the death of Thomas Klestil when I registered my address in Vienna in 2004 - cp. the 'review of the external evidence'. There was a story from school in Molde when I was sitting next to the curtains and there was a stain on it and I put the stain to my nose and made a nose-blow sound and let it back again. The teacher ('Mrs.Berge', a former missionary to Madagascar) looked with some surprise at the yellow-brown spot there and could have gone to look at it after the lesson was over (cp. the death of Haider). In Ehamgasse there was a new caretaker with a name suggesting this story (she also collected signatures at some time - it was not clear what it was for - I signed because I believed it was about a sort of control with whether people really lived in the flats or not - and I have anyhow not subscribed to a scheduled death of Jörg Haider). 'Czernowitz' could be about 'my dear, it is no joke' - if that were the administrative interpretation of the story with the curtain. To blow the nose in the curtain could also be about the virginal membrane and the foreskin. Title 11 could suggest something like that. A 'pessar'? Pessach? The idea that a new head or hood was put on my penis in 1982 is false and it can be proven, and the rumour of such a replaced head could then be met with the claims "e hood? old mert!" These rumours could be contained in the name Helena Goscilo if the rinsing (for example by 'rain water'?) is also an element in the story of Holst. 'Ehud' is right, this means, when he denounces such allegations as 'old mert'.

2/10: Title 10 could be telling of the difference between sperm and 'smegma' found imprinted on a 'Hölderlin'. One could take it as 'probable' that it is sperm and make a child out of it. 'Propp a billi ti' could be that name of 'Ancel-Teitler' (Celan's custody father) which suggests that the genetic relation is in the 'royal corks' in the infancy behinds more than in the bodies. Cp. title 2 in MLR January 1986. 'Vrei sånn på langs' = 'turned that across-thing' = the 'Hahn' of a kitchen water tap, the horizontal bar or handle on top of it. Title 10 would consider this a 'trans-lation' and the turning an 'exegesis'. See the titles of the October 1977 issue above. 'Mannets organ' = 'the man's organ', which could make a Hölderlin a correlate to the handle bar of the water tap.

3/9: A french coup = a coup in Israel? Berman-Fischer published Sachs' 'Sternverdunkelung'. Bil German? Beryllian works? 'Brille-verke' = 'ville brerke'. A question of accuracy could also be about the roomletter on Tårnåsen had talked of a past in accountancy in ways which could have emphasized the slight facial similarity with John F.Kennedy. Could the titles 3/9 simply be about a 'historic fart'? 'Far-t' in norwegian means 'the father of [somebody]'. "It's a fart" can also mean "It is JBG [according to MLR April 1957]". Clearly if this should have been about launching Olmert as an agent for England, it could have been with the notice attached that it is a fart but people should accept that nevertheless: He had no real choice and there is evidence in MLR and e.g. the Eisenhower doctrine.

4/8: If so, it could be that secret microphone tapping of my home could have been used for engineering a similar appearance. 'Patrick' could be about the the next-door bus driver's wife's postcard to me after I had been thrown out from Tårnåsen - it ended in Labråten a year later but I think it did not reach me (I said on the phone that it could wait till some other occasion - and maybe I got it later) - hence Sachs' postcard to me? "Dumme-nikken satt på trikken, spiste appelsin. Så kom konduktören, kastan ut a dören, dumme-nikken satt på trikken, spiste appelsin". 'Krapps last reel' (see also MLR January 1948 at the time of Gandhi) could be telling of tapes with recordings from my monologues etc. Such as "it's a fart"? If secret surveillance of my computer in november 2008 also is the background for the attack on Gaza, it could even be about these titles 4/8. There are surveillance cameras close to my home and I have said that I hope they be taken down - clearly such information-technological data could be used for modelling my presence for hostile purposes in political projects.

5/7: Threats about shooting could be used for engineering the idea that I am a threat against the jewish communities represented by Ehud Olmert. The bombing of Lebanon in 2006 was after I had tried to get in contact with the jews of Seitenstettengasse in Vienna. 'Du ran' = 'you ran' could be said to the kitchen tap.

6: Calderón as tragedian: The case of Las tres justicias en una. By M.Gordon = 'perestroika'. 'M-erd Gordon' could be that earth from which Glasgow rescued the norwegian king and his son in 1940. That ship was 'called on as a tragedy'. Which female was called on as tragedy? The wife of Freemantle in 1907 or 1908? That could be a 'fe-ma-le', 'to paint with iron', or '5 of LE/le'. Molde, Murder etc. Glasnost and perestroika, this seems to mean. 'Cold run' could also be the cold water running from a kitchen tap.

'Turning it around' relative to me could be the strategy.

In short, if this means that Ehud Olmert is an agent for England, launched with the murder of Olof Palme and the Chernobyl disaster, it could be that his role is to represent me when I represent the jewish-genetic diaspora in the mythological construction, for the purpose of turning things around etc and 'taking the place'. One notices the elements of 'Dröbak' in MLR 2004 relative to Beslan. Zipping back and forth could then be the more or less continuous 'taking the place' for a 'pumping' mechanism. If Olmert is an agent, it could then be about the relation to the jewish-genetic diaspora for a 'verboten' Black Sea Loop program conducted from England, and with the secret contained in the presence of Mengele disguised as a white lamb of goodness in 'keys to heaven' - in the last concluding 3 x 3 matrix (see the end of the file - one notices also the 'ronk' and the 'information technology'). This could also be a play with the relation of Ancel = 'Antall' and 'Mengele' and the interval of '5' = 'fem-a-le' days between Antall and Holst in 1993). The unilateral movement of the pump is contained in the Finanzierungsbeitrag for Ehamgasse 23 as under control from Downing Street 10 - in particular if it be about a quasi-philosophical pump of people across the border to death - and the symbolism of a 'pump' is in Hörbiger across the street: They make hydraulic pumps and other 'Einspritzenwerke'. This Hörbiger seems to have been planned or founded in 1896, and it was Paul Hörbiger who played the essential caretaker in 'The third man'. The 'pump' functions if no state power of Austria can manage to effectuate the repayment of the Finanzierungsbeitrag. That is why it could be of much value for preventing another century of nazi disasters that ÖVW repays me the Finanzierungsbeitrag.

The 'pumping' could be reinforced by a role for 'Hahn' as a crossover bar or handle on a kitchen tap a la Rekustad - this Hahn could be present in the 'vraisemblance' of April 1986 #2 and could represent a link from Jerusalem to the centre of a Black Sea Loop in Vienna. In fact even MLR April 2009 can be seen to encode the concept of the 'Vaporetto' in Venice - the socalled 'water-bus' - which travels from planks to planks. 'Brygge Trosse' (for 'Brigate Rosse') is the rope which attaches the boat to the land (= 'editing Swinburne'?) and it can even be recognized in the name of my 1971 or 1972 piano teacher 'Trygve Madsen'. 'Va-po-rett-o' could be precisely that 'kitchen tap Hahn' which somebody 'vrei sånn på langs' at Rekustad in early 1978. (One notices also that when there is a flooding in Venice, this border between sea and land is moved). This means that one could even recognize a link in these January-April 2009 issues of MLR from Olmert in Israel to Hahn in Austria - which again means that if the bombing of Gaza in Christmas was an attempted british hijacking of my work in 'The Dreamer' discovered in november 2008, it could have been a part of the program to use the 'pumping' mechanism in the non-repayment of the Finanzierungsbeitrag in Vienna signified by Johannes Hahn in the austrian government at least untill 2008. It must be up to others to confirm the idea I have had that I have believed to have recognized Hahn from Fredrikstad and 'Krabba' around 1977-78. It could include the Rekustad complex - also in terms of the Eisenhower doctrine #3. The person I have associated with Hahn said a few words to me outside the cinema 'Speilet' = 'The Mirror' just across the street from 'Krabba' = 'Krabset konditori' - cp. the story of Sachs and me in Molde and Tarkowskij's film 'Mirror'. Tarkowskij died from cancer in 1986, after Palme and Chernobyl - and I noticed the mention of Hahn on his homepage that he had battled 'Krebs' in his youth. I don't remember what the words were about - I think I had to conclude that I did not really understand what he meant, in particular since I did not know him. 'Speilet' is across the street from 'Krabseth' and I think Gröver/'Mengele's colleague 'Ole Evensen' (brother of one of the teachers at 'Frydenberg', I think, if it were not even the teacher himself) lived on top of the house where 'Krabseth' was at the ground. Evensen (or his brother) was white-haired and I recall Rudjord talking about his white-haired father who was so mild that when he fell from the houseroof and hung with a grip in the rain-water drain (gutter, 'takrenna', 'drip moulding'?) he said: "Fy sören!" (cp. 'öre-fisen'). 'Ta grenda' could have been Fehlis' or Terboven's order for taking 'Tælavåg' in 1942. And was there a 'nynorsk order' there - for the idea of 'öre-fisen'? Andrej Arseniev 'Ta[r]kowsky' (= 'roof-owsky') could be a name related to the concept of 'öre-fisen' - with connotations to a 'tele' perception. See titles 1/11. (It happened yesterday 21 April that I passed a person in the street and he shook his mobile phone as if it were out of order and said 'merde!' - as if to create the 'öre-fis' = 'ear-fart' in my mind of"why doesn't he write his own web page?"). It should be noticed that 'an-drei ars-en-vei törk-opp-sky' well could be have been the interpretation of the turning of the kitchen tap at Rekustad - for dumping the blame on the other.

If Tarkowsky were murdered, this MLR April 1986 could perhaps have been the responsibility claim for it. It could have been a case of ugly 'whaling', and if this should have been related to Hahn via links to me - for example via the theme in Tarkowsky's films of Sachs/Celan meeting me - one could observe also a potential 'turn-around' effect via the role of Olmert with potential links to England. The story with Ole Evensen (see title 11 about 'Tolstoy, Laclos' = 'The Ole Stöy-la-Close') on top of the Krabseth house and the 'Mirror' on the other ('vraisemblance'?) could have prompted tragic interpretations of the film 'Stalker' which starts and ends with comparable scenes but with something changed in the mean time - during the 'zona' (cp. 'Odda' = 'ogga') story. 'Stalker' was completed in 1979 and the story with Rekustad was in early 1978 and the scene at the cinema 'Mirror' could have been some time later. If Tarkowsky were murdered with cancer in 1986, it could in theory have been related to this 'Krabseth' story from the late seventies - in which case it could have been about a hostile integration into his own artwork. 'A good film' and british administration tries to hijack it in order to look good themselves (or for launching somebody who works for them) - that could be the contents of the MLR April 1986. I hope the plan is not to repeat this project on me. The british war against the intellectuals is not anything valuable - is it simply hatred against art and poetic cognition? I don't know who the 'Stalker' with the mobile could have been - or if he related to me at all.

One cannot both murder and understand the film. When there was so much drama in Raskolnikov's confession, that was because they (Dostoyevsky's time) attempted to rescue the understanding of the art. A british security bureau cannot understand this if the 'Raskolnikov confession' is totally out of the question. That also means that if Tarkowsky's art is replaced with the art of a security bureau or what they can sell, there is a serious loss of value in the 'product'. It is not the same after the hijack even if people are cheated to believe that it is about the same. Which means that such 'whaling' is no progress at all. It means that people must be careful and not make too good art - otherwise they risk being murdered, could be even with a responsibility claim in advance in the MLR.

The 'cold run' of water as in title #6 could be the innermost secret in the film - the water running from above. As for 'go o skylde ho'.

It is the respect of secrets in administration which causes this problem of the war against the intellectuals. Even newspapers aren't what they used to be. Click here for a page from Wiener Zeitung 5 April 1934 which seems to suggest that 'Simmering' of today (with Ehamgasse) is the 'Severing' of the pre-Röhm-putsch days, which even could allow for the reading 'Leif-ering', preceded by the 'Stene' and a 'Johansen' story and followed by the 'kein Hitler-Übergang' and a 'non-vulgata' translator. (See also the October 1957 issue - before the apparent rape of me in Christmas 1957). Then the story - under the main headline - could be 'Kein und Abel', and 'Wiener Zeitung' for 5/4-1934 can be seen to present evidence that Hitler was agent for England via the contents of the then fresh MLR April 1934 which contains about the same elements:

1. The epigrams of Henry Peacham and Henry Parrot. By Margaret C. Pitman
2. A note on the last years of Defoe. By James R. Sutherland
3. Notes on the poems of Bertran de Born, III. By L.E. Kastner
4. Robert Finch and Enrico Mayer. By E.R.P.Vincent
5. Das dritte Reich. By Agnes Stansfield

4 = the 'vulgata' of Exodus 20:4 as 'take the spoon heavy' and 'excrement-runners'.

In worst case, the attack on Gaza could have been for hijacking my work for presenting it to 'the people of Israel' disguised as an agent and murdering me quite simply because it is a great discovery I have made. There was an [h]outbreaking of 'swine pest' in April 2009 - could be it was about the moment when the Hitler detaches from the JFK and the LSJ and/or his brother or precursor.

When the April 2009 issue seems to focus on the moment when the boat touches or leaves the pier and the rope is on or off, it could be about the moment when the tap is opened on Rekustad in early 1978. This could furthermore signify the moment when the biscuit of the communion is transubstantiated in the mouth - which for the view on this christian communion which relates it to former circumcision ceremonies lends attention to the role of the 'host' which in norwegian means a cough as with tuberculosis. The epidemic SARS could have been put in circulation for representing this element of the SARX which could have been the reason for the name of Sachs in the mythological story, and when it typically is situated on the border between the body and the air in breath, the 'cough' of the 'host' could tend to activate the idea of 'tuberculosis' is that is a concept which is attached by politics to the ceremonies of circumcision. Cp. also 'vapour-et-to' = 'damp 1-2'. 'Ett to ett to en stövel og en sko'. SARS seems to have started after 2000 in the Guangdong area in China. I could tell that when I saw the second of Tone Gröver's children I said that it looked like a 'god unge' ('a good child'). However, the 'Guangdong' is probably rather related to the idea of stepping off a 'Vaporetto' in Venice or something like that.

The big question is why people do not help me. I do not even have an address whereto I can send my work. It would be no wonder if british administration follows me around town with satellite camera. I am not informed about it if I am surveyed and my computer is tapped - and the secret service may not think that they could destroy valuable work with surveying me. One must warn against a 'scenario' of the type which allows for extensive abuse of my work in the beginning and a scheduled 'rescue' at a later stage, such as by abuse of material from my computer while nobody stops it. Why should one allow for another holocaust? That seems to be the plan and then it is supposed to be the conclusion that it could not be avoided because it was too late etc. There is no reason why one should continue with that tragic nazism at all. Politics today seems to be a game which is played by some people whose interests really has not much to do with the concerns of the people they rule.

If the post does not function in Italy, it is not so easy to live here.

England must, according to the scheme in MLR, be considered an illegal terrorist organization who has no constitutional power at all - and who wants to swap this role with e.g. Austria. They have as such no rights to exert power on Austria via the Staatsvertrag of 1955. "...liquidieren die Überreste des Nazismus..." - but those seem to be in England! Could be the 'Staatsvertrag' = 'flushing down' = 'Ned-trekker' is meant to apply to England?

Could be this phenomenon applies to many states of the world, if terror and fraud for international influence and puppet regimes could be the character of the british government. Was this also the story of Iraq and Afghanistan? McCarthyism could have been for the sole purpose of having 'Ray-mond' as the middle name on a historic period, in extension from 'Stutthof' and pointing towards 'Bloody Sunday', and the Eisenhower doctrine could in principle correspondingly have been for making 'Malvasia Vecchia' in Venice a centre of attention.

Kretschmer's theory of types includes the idea of transition from leptosome to 'pyknic' (I don't know how it is spelt) in the course of a lifetime. A 'leptosome' (if that is the spelling) is brainy and a pyknic abdomen-oriented. The unification of these two types means - although I am not sure if I have understood it right - that the third type splits into two parts: One muscle and one skeleton, 'sarx' and 'antal'. This pertains also to the brain's relation to the skull.

chetchmer = church-mer[d] = the seaway between France and England for the AIDSHIV lift, or for the 'merd' in the skull. Corresponding to the lift from churchtown Venice to Rome across 'Fir-enze' = 'four corners' = the diamonds or gingersnap form.

dansk ape
dan-i-skapet = dan-skeleton = the man in the cupboard in the Holst story
i dans-kapet = dans-i-gjelden
keleton = gjeldeten = kjertelen = the gland

This means that if the school dentistry on me in 1970 could have included injection of hormones at the time of the onset of my puberty, it was the dentist Aulie who took the role of the glands who injected hormones in my body. Aulie = Italia = [s]keleton?

Could be the concept is 'Keleti PU' in Budapest? (There is also a Deli PU and a Nyugati PU).

'Hanskapet' = 'han-i-skapet' ('the man in the cupboard') = 'hanske-ape' = 'glover-ape'.

Now when the first title of MLR October 1920 is "Vernacular books in England in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. By M.Deanesly", it suggests that this 'Deanesly' correlate to the 'Spearing' in title 2 corresponds to the school dentist Aulie of mine, which again means that the role of 'Aulie' could have been to take the place of Celan's fatherhood by way of adminstration. It is a way of replacing the genetic connection with administration. The intended effect should then have been that Celan would have pronounced 'deanesly' = 'din heslige' to me - rejecting me because I would have looked 'heslig' to him and not likely to have been his son. (Cp. also the 'Donald Duck' magazine from Molde). That would have been because of 'british' logic (in the skull) after experiments suggesting that injections of hormones from outside at the age of puberty make the young person look like the injector more than the genetic parents. Gloomy logic. It could have been the administrative concept that my genetic parents should have rejected me as an administrative product.

The injections in 1970-71 could theoretically have been also with the fluid containing a mashed foetus from a child made from eggs from a sister and sperm from Hitler - which by a 'cheap linguistic trick' should have meant that my body welcomed these as 'my own genetics' - which should mean that Hitler was my 'own' genetics. That is what the 'walking ad' construction could mean - a 'Judensau' which swaps role with Hitler. I don't mean to say that this was normal school dentistry in Norway in those days - rather it could theoretially have been a project of the administration of my mythological role, but of course I don't have any proofs or even reasons beyond speculation based on the fact that there was excessive drilling on my teeth which required a rather long series of visits to the dentist with a series of injections and of course those injections could in principle have been the reason for the excessive drilling. However, the MLR July 1970 provides some evidence or at least suggestions that the story could have been just something like this:

MLR July 1970

1. William Fowler and italian literature. By R.D.S.Jack
2. Why did Milton err on two chinas? By Y.Z.Chang
3. 'Roxana' and the masquerades. By David Blewett
4. No single scholiast: Pope's 'The Dunciad'. By Arthur Sherbo
5. Dickens' marchioness again. By Angus Easson
6. Some problems in 'La mort le roi Artu'. By Peter Noble
7. The structure of Chrétien's 'Yvain'. By Z.P.Zaddy
8. Themes in parnassian poetry. By Edna Epstein
9. Cassola on realism. By T.O'Neill
10. New light on the continuity of dutch literature in the sixteenth century. By Theodoor Weevers
11. The return of the hind: Hebbel's 'Genoveva' and its epilogue. By Frank M.Fowler
12. An unpublished german comedy: Kolbenheyer's 'Das Wort'. By Alfred D.White
13. Eros and nirvana in the art of Bunin. By James B.Woodward

1/13: William Fowler = the bird-young who waits with open mouth in the dentist's chair and 'eats everything'.

2/12: Das Wort = Vulgata 1

3/11: My guess is that masks could have been used in Christmas 1957 if I were raped by Hitler (or whoever it could have been). Now in 1970 the hind returns in the form of "Hebbel's 'Genoveva' and its epilogue" = Hitler's gene-of-Eva = A doll Fitler's genetics. It is Frank M.Fowler who can offer this to the 'William Fowler'

4/10: Dunch, dutch etc - would this have been about the genetics of a sister?

5/9: Could it be about Dickens' 'PANER' - as in the 'Paneriu' execution site at Vilnius - for swapping bread and wine = wed and/in brine?

6-7-8: Could be variations on the theme of excretion (a sort of Keleti PU?): 'Alle må til Aulie' = 'everybody must to Aulie', for 'T-almud B-avlie'. The school dentist was called Aulie. There are traces of T/B/P in the three titles, such as 7. 'Misbruk av Gröver John. By Zeddy Zappy'. Who would be the semen in the mashed foetus? There was the US TV series called MASH from military environments which hence could invoke associations to 'sady soldier's etc., cp. the death of 'Jörg Haider'.

I do hope that the british strategy is not to tap my computer and launch my poetic idea through the poets of the 'parnassus' (they do not have to be involved in that, of course) and then pretend that when I come up with the same some time later it is a pale plagiarism of british poetry. In principle, but I have no reason to believe so (beyond two front pages of Poetry Review which were alarmingly similar to two photos of mine in a series with poetic text to them), it is possible that my poetic analysis of 'From harbour to harbour' (greek Seferis' 'Apo limani se limani', which I would not confuse with ideas of 'Limfjorden') in the spring 2008 could have been hijacked with the murder of Haider and launched as 'Brown hawked silly in the field' with the MLR January and April 2009 issues. In the mean time, some more or less 'parnassian poet' could have written a book which could be (I don't follow the news and have nobody in mind) published, for example with 'BA38' airport echos. (I did send my URL to Faber before I had found this MLR evidence). And so I could come up with some 'bowel-akk' rather than 'bröd-akk'. If this is the strategy, the purpose would have been that 'no other national secret service will be able to defend the interests of John Bjarne Grover' even if they perfectly well may be aware of the fact that the material originated on my computer in Athens. That would mean that no state administration will be able to defend the interests of the jewish-genetic diaspora when the verboten program starts. Then England would feel that they control not only austrian administration with the Finanzierungsbeitrag but even the authority of the national secret services over the world. It really would mean that there are lots of secret agents for England around in the administrations.

Administrative logic had probably hoped that I would have looked and thought like Hitler if his genetics were injected in my blood at the onset of my puberty. Could be Gröver/'Mengele' was son of Hitler - and therefore I should have believed that he was my genetic father and this would have made me an easier target of an administrative swap with e.g. politicians in Israel. The british hopes in the power of administration have certainly failed and it is time to realize that administration only functions as long as the historic consciousness wants it to function.

The rest of the fictional story - with the apparent plans for a sister collaborating with the skull-sawers - could derive from such an origin of the mashed foetus - as if I had 'eaten' her own child.

If 'Aulie' means 'Italia' and not only 'Aure-Osen', then the injections of mashed foetus could have correlates in the 'Brigate Rosse' - for flushing the 'rosse' down - in a 'Staatsvertrag'? - with some 'Brigg' = an innocent norwegian 'non-alcoholic beer' from the early seventies - the very opposite of a 'dievöl' = 'devil-beer' - at the 'rosse' lips, suggesting that there could have been 'non-alcoholic beer' in the dentist's injections of 'bediövelse'. (Beer hold/hall putsch?) When the glass is at the lips, it is at the teeth - hence the drinker (cp. San Pantalon) is a 'dentist'? Glasgow? The mash (wasn't that a US TV series, a comedy?) 'tweetus' could be the homonculus one over the door in San Pantalon - 'd-over'. British responsibility claims for this could be in the corresponding 'Wexel Wexelsen' principles, such as the italian system of maximum 250 euros per day transferred from abroad via credit card in bank cashpoints. These principles probably correspond to the disjointing of the skeleton from the flesh (united and loyal untill d'ovre falls) which sets 'sarx' off from the 'antall' at the same time as Kretschmer's ideas of a change of the leptosome onto a pyknic type (which means blunting people's brains?). The authority of the grey matter is then theoretically displaced and the mythological role assigned to the genetic sister could be to hijack this authority. Grey matter is not renewed in the organism and some further strange logic could tell that the neural tissue which was built in childhood is under the authority of the custody parents in childhood.

If 'Brigate Rosse' were in the role of 'NMI of the state', that should not allow for an identification of me with them.

MLR October 1970

1. Spenser's allegorical 'houses'. By R.F.Hill
2. Thomas Middleton at Oxford. By David George
3. Massinger's London merchant and the date of 'The city madam'. By C.A.Gibson
4. On 'The snayl' by Richard Lovelace. By Randolph L.Wadsworth, Jr.
5. 'El príncipe constante' and 'The indian emperour': A reconsideration. By John Loftis
6. Baudelaire's personified abstractions. By David Saunders
7. 'L'inconnu': A fragment of 'Jean Santeuil'. By Maya Slater
8. Poetic theory in mid-eighteenth-century Italy. By S.N.Cristea
9. The persistence of romantic thought in Spain. By R.A.Cardwell
10. Homage and revolt in Goethe's 'Torquato Tasso'. By T.M.Holmes
11. 'Countries of the mind': Max Frisch's narrative technique. By Mary E.Cock
12. Anglo-swedish literary relations 1867-1900: The fortunes of english literature in Sweden. By B.W.Downs

The basic elements seem to be Aure-Osen, the back seat of the VW, the 'kaudervelsk' and the postcard of 1924 with the kaudervelsk wording 'Horn, Britt, Buffals':

1/12: Charles de Gaulle. The 'Fill' could have been in the dentist's chair. 'Drarles the skulle' could mean the opened skull into which somebody empties the bowels as if leaving the contents in a 'library'. I don't know why such contents-emptying could be associated with 'Sweden' in a british mind. Hitler's postcard was sent from Hamburg to Paris, with links to Norway = norwegian-french relations.
2/11: Kauderv-elsk = chew-dead love: The dubious farter and the love. Cannibalism as political parametre
3/10: Messenger's London murder = the british responsibility claim on Lenin in Hitler's postcard. The date of the city madam = the date 22 Nov 1999 when I was driven to a 'madhouse' = JFK ass day, hence the 562 weeks from 1924 to 1970 = T-262. Homage and revolt = Gröver/'Mengele' turning and looking at me, or in the mirror. Genocide factor
4/9: Richard Lovelace could be the leafage canopy and the 'kaudervelsk' ,while the persistence of 'spanish' romance could be Hitler's rape and 'postcard' = 'Cardwell'. The snail = the VW? Pederasty
5/8: Permutations, distributions, Mirror (7-13-7-13). Acts 10. Sachs on Söder. There is some interesting observation to be made in the '18th century' in terms of the year 1975 when I was subjected to some diseases which made it possible to 're-consider' the potential infancy chemistry - but then it would have been planned in 1970. The 'constant principle' and the 'indian emperor' could, though, be taken to represent the concept of 'third eye', in particular when coupled with the idea of 'John Loftis' and reconsideration. When that is '18th century' and furthermore relate to 5/9 of July 1970 as the PANER, there is the evidence in Laser Ran's book 'Jerusalem of Lithuania' from 1974 about the execution site 'Paneriu' at Vilnius. The plan would then have been to use a laser for making the third eye in narcosis in 1975. The purpose would have been the remote control with the authorship.
6/7: 'Jean Santeuil' could be the dust road of Sandveien 4, my first address = l'inconnu. 'Bodde er' = 'lived there'. Lived in Odos Paxon 15, Athens? That is where Stephen Saunders were murdered in 2000.

But the dust road at Aure-Osen was under a leafage canopy and hence it was a dust road under and a leaf road over = 'löv-vei[d]' which backwards yields the 'dievöl' of the dentistry brew. Cp. the tremolo and the interest. There is also the idea of a high position in 'Loppekassa'.

Do you believe the 'dievöl' cast a magic spell on me? I suppose the story is that some 'homunculuses' in e.g. the labour party cooked up these concepts - reading backwards and forwards - and launched some distributed concepts for the people to chew on. If you put these wellchewed pieces together, you could be on the track of the Mystery.

The conclusion on October 1970 seems to be that the murder or death of de Gaulle served to install 'Mengele' into the slot of 'Aulie': 'Everybody must to Mengele' = 'Mengele on the ramp' in the role of St.Peter = 'Strandpromenaden' at Isegran. It means the program of dr.Verboten. If that is the back seat of the VW, it could be about the T-262 of Aure-Osen as the model for Ehamgasse 23 with the Finanzierungsbeitrag if there were secret surveillance equipment installed for securing control with the Finanzierungsbeitrag even after the tenants have moved out. 'Everybody must join the program of emptying the bowels into the heads of the jewish-genetic diaspora' could be the theme of the 'almud avli'. Is that the concept of the 'public convenience'? But that could be about 'i hod[e] old merd' in which case it could have been about 'Ehud Olmert' leading the flock wherein everybody must empty their bowels into the head of me in the sense of the jewish-genetic diaspora. But that is when it could be about a 'secret agent' for 'in-glan' with 'black-sea-loop' plans.

The novel After I had made the discovery of the unity of The Dreamer and The Endmorgan Quartet writing on my computer in november 2008, the pension payment was moved first to Harstad and then to Etterstad in Norway. This could mean 'same narkotika' and 'same arm-i-touch' (as with the 'coptic story' from 1983) or 'same norway-touch' - in sum something close to the name 'Simon Armitage' in british poetry.


There is a gingersnap form under the ceiling of San Pantalon for the characters 1) Swift/Göring, 2) Himmler/Mengele (and possibly some other Scriblerus, such as John Arbuthnot or John Gay), 3) Pope/Goebbels, and 4) Hitler/Churchill/Kennedy (and possibly Thomas Parnell?). This is apparently the basis for at least some of the characters encoded in the Eisenhower doctrine (e.g. 1=5, 2=6, 3=7 - cp. MLR at my birth), and the gingersnap form (Ginger Rogers etc) also seems to be found in central Venice in the area encoded with the name 'Malvasia Vecchia' which seems to be the basis for the AIDSHIV as a 'malattia venerica' (cp. the uncle of 'Martinus'). It is the slanting tower of San Stefano which hangs over this 'Malvasia Vecchia' gingersnap which could have been the real reference of 11 September 2001 and then it could have meant the starting signal for a 'verboten' Black Sea Loop program in Europe spreading out from Vienna (with its 'Stephanskirche') towards Paris for a lift-over to London by way of the AIDSHIV lift rooted in Santa Maria Formosa. The Dead Sea Scrolls of 1947 seems from MLR January 1947 to be british fraud - possibly for the purpose of a persecutional program in the sense of this Black Sea Loop as a parallel to the holocaust 1933-45 against the people of Israel, which possibly was in extension from a similar Scriblerus background of the old norse sagas of the people of Iceland (who reportedly went bankrupt some time ago). There are links to a Vilnius-Vienna-Venice axis representing Turkey-Vienna-Paris (and we must hope the britons do not have plans on Vilnius for speeding up the loop). It seems unfortunately that my authorship is abused as template for terrorism for giving shape to this program. The starting signal of 11 September 2001 would apparently have been the british responsibility claim which could be found also via the role of Modern Language Review (such as July 2001) whose history also seems to have included an indexation of the start of AIDSHIV in their October 1978 issue. The overarching reason for all this in the concept of 'anglican wellness' should not be considered a 'goodenough reason' for millions of people suffering all over the world. The evidence in MLR suggests that one must reconceptualize one's ideas about the modern world to the conclusion that the british administration is a terrorist organization and as such must be considered an outlawed part of the European Union. Which for example also means that they have no legal support in the 1955 Staatsvertrag for a murder of Haider. The housing crisis is something which perhaps is hanging over the UK embassies like a tower of San Stefano, and Modern Language Review can well be the explicit reason for that.

See the brief summary of the story for some further aspects of Venice.

If british administration or at least the power of England in terms of their secret services must be considered a terrorist organization, it may be that the israeli attack on Gaza and Hamas in Christmas 2008 can be considered an attack on a comparable terrorist organization - and that it consequently meant an attack aiming at a list of leaders whose names and locations to a large extent were known. But the theory I had elaborated in November 2008 also showed the HAM morph as an essential tag which is the natural target of attention for a serious study of the theory. I can only hope that this does not make for an identity of my discovery with british interests. The present study of MLR can be telling of the story.

The conclusion anyhow presents itself that the british governmental program cannot be in conformity with the expectations and beliefs of the average briton and one could call the situation a case of coup - based on the religious traditions of the country.

Could be the bombings of Moscow were 'successful' as seen from a UK/US point of view. What if e.g. a newspaper could contact an editor of a publishing house, suggesting that my book be published, or maybe send me a letter about it if they know about a russian publishing house who could be interested in publishing my books in english? That would be to take me and my authorship seriously. The 1999 bombings (and other US/UK terror) could have been 'successful' in that sense of it - that to take me and my authorship seriously could be felt like a threat - and therefore people take the other way instead - in conformity with US/UK intentions - and then I am not felt like a threat and things feel fine. In that way US/UK can use me as a 'zwischenpapier' to spread their interests around to other parts of the world by way of terror. If USA 'wouldn't like it' if my book were published elsewhere, that tells of how urgently important it could be to get out of the US/UK political abuse-soup.

"Not the dogma of Leiv Eirikson, I presume."

© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 14 February 2009
Last updated 23 April 2009