The assumed 'Zinckgasse project' summed up again

The assumed 'Zinckgasse project' summed up again

John Bjarne Grover

This article continues the discussion in the article Zinckgasse and other recent articles.

There is the theory that my person has been constructed in extension from the mythos that contains also Adolf Eichmann. For example, the world's biggest earthquake took place near Concepzion in Chile only a few minutes after the israeli arrest of Eichmann had been announced for Knesset and my younger official sister was born 9 months and 1 day later. Nelly Sachs died probably around the hour 10 years after the arrest, on my official mother's birthday. The assumption is that the world's biggest earthquake was by a bomb triggered after one had succeeded in getting fertile biological material out of me (then 3 years of age) - and e.g. the Cuban missile crisis could have been about these things - 'dirrende spenene' and things like that. In principle, there could have been children born from me from about february-march 1961 if this theory obtains.

The present article investigates the potential political structure that can be observed in the assumption that a series of at least 4-5 daughters (potentially in a successively extending subtree) was made for the role of having a sexual intercourse with me asleep like the daughters of Lot drinking him full of wine (for having children with him). It is the systematic function of this role in the political construction which would have been sufficient for leaving them with no choice. I do not believe or feel that any of these would have done it for the harm - the construction tells why they had no choice. It would also have been their dimaggios - a concept which could have been formed (via Hollywood etc) even for precisely these four people. In addition, this is pure guesswork of mine only.

A part of the reason for the guess of 4-5 daughters for this role is in the 4-5 revolutions of 2011 - Kyrgyztan, Egypt, Tunesia, Libya plus some 'rebellion' in Syria. These four cases of 'sexual intercourse' would have served a double function: 1) To encode the norwegian concept of 'HO TARAM' = 'she undresses him', thereby linking the four cases to the four occurrences of the vedic or sanskrit word HOTARAM = 'burnt-sacrifice' (like the holocaust wherein Eichmann had a central role) in the course of the 424 first verses of Rig-Veda, and 2) to thereby allow for this 'reduction mystery' to be attached via the genetic tree (imitated in the 2011 revolutions) to the main rape of the father by an assumed representative of the US democrat party in 1973 - potentially encoded even in advance in the name of Bob Dylan to be understood in relation somehow with the accumulation of a slight 'bob' of fat under a nipple of mine - politically serving as a 'proof' that my person could not withstand the moral pressure from the octogon. This does probably not mean that I can claim to identify a rapist of 1973 - and neither is U-land the same as Y-land (there was also the wellknown swedish entertainer 'Hyland' in those days), but some associative links there could have been.

One guesses that the representative could have been Bill Clinton in some sense of it, that is, either himself or a 'mythological' representative, and that the Zinckgasse function is to recognize this as being by Buckingham via the retrospective catalogue in British Library. I am 'heir to the throne' of that retrospective catalogue in the sense of the sausage skin that holds the transatlantic unit in shape - but I am not a 'sausage skin' in the sense of being actively involved in a rape. The political trick could, though, be associated with a role-turning in that sense of it.

With the octogon considered sufficient moral pressure on my person, it is assumed that the body of mine could give in to the pressure and produce a female breast as 'solution' - while a male rape of me in 1973 could have been the real reason? - in particular if the experience (in drugged condition) of 1973 later came to be reinvoked by recurrence of the rapist in rebuilt shape along with a significational pressure constructed via the AIDSHIV epidemic - and potentially other sources. The construction would then have been that the real reasons for the accumulation of the fat would have been in the male rape while the 'official' explanation would have been in the moral pressure from the octogon.

This could have been the reason for western interests in the formation of the new state of South Sudan - like Norway could have been established in 1814 for making a US pogrom on indians possible. South Sudan = Sör-Sudan = Sör-VIS by the mammal/crustacean swap. The services. The first POWER a human learns or rather experiences is the instinctual SUCK soon after its birth. This means that the whole construction could be about lending power to the services.

SUD-b-AhN = SÜDBAHN-hof when these B's are included. Südbahnhof in Vienna was knocked down and Hauptbahnhof built in its place - the work with the pulldown started around the day when I came to Vienna in late 2009. The enigma is that the 12-track new Hauptbahnhof - however big and prunky it may look - in fact probably has a smaller capacity than the humble Südbahnhof used to have - I think Südbahnhof had more than 20 tracks. Today, after the opening of Hauptbahnhof, much of that traffic overload is moved to Wien Meidling. This enigma could be meant to imitate the reduction of the number of elements to the rigvedaen 424 of the 4-5 revolutions of 2011.

A RIG in the mexican gulf was VELTA (toppled, wrecked) before the british general election in 2010. Rig-Velta.

The theory is that the ultimate rooting of this 'project' is in Kennedy's rape of me in 1957, if that is the story. Plus a theoretic skull opening of 1957 and assumed chemicals of 1959 - and the Kennedy assassination of 1963. Hence the US democrat party.

Now for the theoretic construction which seems to be about gaining quasi-legitimate political power by way of terror:

If a sexual criminal from the White House or thereabout is running around from time to time in the corridors of the house where I live, and if that sexual criminal also attacked and raped me in 1973, I think I have the right to expect that the criminal be not allowed access to the house as long as I live there, for the simple reason that I otherwise risk meeting him in the house and that would not be a situation which is good for the general condition or health of my life.

It would be about the phenomenon of 'physical proximity' which also can be understood to be about the possibility of linguistic communication without tele-equipments - that is, that meaningful sound waves travel through gas and activate the eardrum in such a way that the central nervous system is activated. This could mean simply 'nerve gas'. It happened not long after I had moved into the flat that a fuse went out due to short circuitry in an outlet - an electrician came and repaired it but only a few days later even the fan in the bathroom went out of order. Likewise, the graffitis in Venice soon after I had signed the contract in 2009 seemed to tell the same - an appliance for the british nation (a toaster) with and without electric connection plus some 'gas' on the Rialto.

'Oslo Terror' could be another and related concept.

But if this is the crux of the story, there is not much I can do about it personally as long as I cannot prove an assumed rape of 1973 nor its relevance for later times. 'Bob Dylan' is not enough 'proof'. But the sexual intercourses with the four daughters - with the correlates in the revolutions of 2011 - could have been easier to have attested - and hence the construction including the 2011 revolutions serves to dump the blame or burden of the 1973 story on them.

It could anyhow be the basis for the möbius construction - that the genetic family tree is blamed for the terror which the 'services' are doing.

However, it is easy to see that if my person (qua 'John Grover' of British Library retrospective catalogue, cp. 'two-nibble rear') is as essential to the construction as it seems to be, and if that is in the form of the 'sausage skin' that holds it all together in shape, containing the names of Charles, William, possibly Harry, Bill Jefferson Clinton, since it is clear from my personal history and career that the construction makes it urgent for me to bring the intrigue to an end and when that leads to my desperate shouts DOWNGRADE! DOWNGRADE! - get the secrets out! - then the construction is of such a kind that it looks as if I should be in desperate need of a toilet in which to empty the bowels which the sausage skin could look like.

That is, it would look like the only solution to the construction would be to empty the secrets that are contained in the sausage skin - but when this means dropping the royal names in the toilet, it amounts to an insult against the majesty. It means that the only real solution to the problem is via an insult against the majesty - and that is not permitted.

This logic could have been constructed for adding the inavoidability of the secrets to the services of South Sudan etc - for the ultimate conclusion that the power must remain with the secret services.

The secret services.

Ultimately this could be a basis for aspirations of England to be the world power #1 - with the US democrat party as their running boys. If, that is, the construction is considered 'safe'.

For example, US school shooting can apparently be used for increasing the popularity of the US democrat party (in a construction related to my person) on basis of the false logic that the children of mine (the four daughters) were in need of love from the father who had so cruelly denied them that, even if the children have the right to it, but the heros in the US democrat party (if they were the ones who threatened the children to commit the sexual intercourse with me in 'fast asleep' condition) could help the children with getting some love from the father - but the beastly father only 'shot' at the children in return. Therefore US school shootings seem to be significationaly linked to me (like that Sandy Hook) - because it allows for this sort of short circuitry in the logic of the secret services who identify me as the shooter (against the children) and who claim to be the ones who help the children. But clearly this sort of logic functions relative to the public only by way of secrets - if these secrets leak out, then the logic does not apply any longer. Hence the power of the secret services.

Likewise, the twin bombing of the US embassies in Dar-es-Salaam and Nairobi in 1998 soon after I had received the rejection of my PhD and was writing my appeal to that decision ('ANKA', as it is called in norwegian) could be seen to be the view of a female down between her 'embassies' - 'there is the salami' and 'now it is up in it'. It was my official sister Tone Gröver who told me in probably the late 70's that she knew a girl called Anka who was so fertile that she got pregnant if people only looked at her. She lived not far from a train level crossing (not far from Glemmen church / Röde Mölle in Fredrikstad), if I remember right, which went up and down all day long.

In Vilnius there is also a street called 'Janos Basanaviciaus Gatve' which formerly was called 'Pohulanka', cp. swedish for 'Donald Duck' = 'Kalle Anka' as a 'Jesus Banana-vits'. The polish PM after the disaster with the loss of the top 100 leaders of the country in Smolensk is called Donald Tusk. A 'Paul Anka' could of course be 'Paul Ancel'. A pole in lithuanian is a 'lenkas', I think.

Hegyeshalom = Here-is-Salaam?
Levél = hungarian for 'letter' = Nairobi - hence the idea of post censorship?
Mosonmagyaróvar = morsom Magyar o-var?

However, even Omagh was bombed and the real 'semantics' to the terror of the summer 1998 was likely to be the line 'rejected on a political basis' - as if the terror was my way of writing the appeal, the ANKA, the 'terror' of ejaculating on the daughters - "he shot at his own children"!

Is all terror of this type?

Conclusion: The plan of the intrigue could be to fade down the role of my daughters in order for POWER to take their place under the pretext that they had raped me. I dont consider it that way: I dont think these four dimaggios raped me - it was those who forced them to do it - the 'clintoneans', that could be - who were the rapists. Which means that taking the loving daughters for brute and cruel rapists is a terribly bad misunderstanding - which could have been precisely the purpose with that 'dimaggio'.

But you say perhaps that Clinton - if he raped me in 1973 - were in the same situtation and that he was made for a 'Sound of Music' job as US president and had no choice? What is the difference to the daughters, if even these raped me? That could be the nut to crack. I suppose the nut is not so hard: The difference is that if Clinton were made for the job (of becoming president), he could perhaps not avoid to carry out the rape (for example, he or a representative of his could have been present at the hotel in 1973, hiding in a cupboard or whatever) if he wanted to become a politician who should be involved in or at least concerned with school shootings and embassy bombings and other forms of terror, while the daughters would have done it for the purpose of avoiding such terror (which could have been contained in a threat for forcing them to do it) - which is the real difference to the daughters.

Now there are some signs that the clintoneans could have been planning to make me blind - for a 'Lundikingus' project that seems to have been running since at least Martin Luther King. I do hope these plans are never going to substantialize. Such plans - if they exist - could rest on the logic of 'kill blinton' (or even 'kiss blinton') and 'gone devourer'. 'Biff Gellért-son Klinten' could in fact be about that austro-hungarian link to the Gellért hill and hotel with the famous bath in Budapest.

Once again: Is Clinton (if he raped me) in the same situation as the daughters? He is not: The difference is that Clinton, if he did it, could have done it for being able to get in the position of being able to carry out or allow for terror against e.g. the school children and thereby claim to be in the same position as me (the same as me, that is) when I 'shot' at the children, ejaculating on the daughters. That would be the purpose with potential plans of blinding me - that it would complete this 'identity' - for a complete blame-dumping onto me - as if the 'gone devourer' had devoured a 'beef of Gellert-son klinten' - empty word games made for cheating the public because the public have not access to the secrets.

That is the Hitler strategy - to ask the public for the authority to do some terror by way of which the Führer in return can offer some grace.

That would be the difference - that Clinton could have done it for being able to bathe in an ocean of terror (called 'grace' in the language of propaganda) while the loving daughters could have done it for being able to avoid the terror (another and less propaganda-coloured form of 'grace').

That is the difference. That is a difference.

Grace is what the american people are after due to the unhappy story with the indians - a story which can be hard to forgive. So they need grace - and that is what politics could be trying to offer them.

The university of Oslo in located at Blindern, not far from Vindern. You wont find the university if you look around for it at Vindern. Cp. the 'Oslo Terror'?

I saw also the film 'The artist'.

My guess is that the political project could have been made for preparing for a new Hitler - who could be hostile towards me and the children (the daughters) on a propaganda basis claiming that we were criminals, offenders, shooting people etc.

This is the combined effect - the secret services do not want the secrets downgraded because it is easier for them to cheat the public with empty word games when they cannot find the real basis for the cheat. For example, I am a totally unknown person for the public - and if the propaganda tells that I should be a 'dirty beast' who 'shoot children', it is difficult for the public to reject such claims if they have not access to the secrets. Therefore terror can lead to a paradoxical increase of public support to those who were responsible for the terror - such as seems to be the case with the phenomenon of school shooting.

What is a 'J' on an 'F.Kundy'? Is it a 'clinten'? Things like that. Norwegian 'görring' means a 'boring person', also called 'kjedelig' = 'chainy'. The attempt on Lenin by 'Fanny Jefimovitch Kaplan' was in august 1918 - I looked at the 'Modern Language Review' edition of july 1918 and believe that I could spot the plans for Hitler's government 1933-45 in the undertext there. And do I see that Hermann Göring's real name was 'Kennedy'? He was Hitler's chief of the air forces. Could be some would present such evidence as this and suggest that 'Bill Jefferson Clinton' must have been made for the job and had no choice but had to let himself be involved in a rape of me. If so, what would be the difference to the daughters? The difference is in the understanding of what terror is - whether it is 'grace' or rather the very opposite.

It seems that the HOTARAM of the Rig-Veda is used by politics for obtaining just that hitlerian 'wolkenwagen' trick of offering grace by way of terror.

Is it as crazy as that - that 'terror = Clinton' and 'Clinton = terror'?

11 september 2001 - was it 'twin ta-overs' = 'twin take-overs' in that sense of 'the same' (twin, Clinton compared with daughters) taking over?

It is likely that the crux of the story rests on distributed responsibility and that Clinton personally would try and avoid orders or involvement which could compromise him or them as far as terror is concerned - but that e.g. school shootings could be organized via people who want 'Clintons' in the administration. A part of the reason for this could be the wish to make Clinton's situation and story 'the same' as the daughters - for a 'the same ta-overs'. It is important to understand that it is not the same and cannot be the same, however much the responsibility for the organization of the terror could be distributed and hard to track. Terror is not grace.

Now for the question whether I should remain in Zinckgasse or move out - on this background: I do not feel certain that the indexation of the John Grovers of British Library is sufficiently strong in the Zinckgasse environment to be the whole thing - I would say it is not so much. But clearly if bodily proximity is the story, everybody would agree that it was not I who should have moved out but rather the rapist, if that is the story. I tell the story of Simon Walther Hauge and Darlen Bakke, my neighbours at Rekustad 1977-78. The couple were well known musicians who were running a music centre on Hauge farm - as I can confirm from at least 1974-75. 'Darlehen Bakke' would mean that it can be heavy to repay a loan in the bank, in particular under the circumstances of mine whereby the international interest level could start rising rather immediately after I had taken up a loan for being able to buy a house or flat, while 'Simon Walther Hauge' invokes associations to 'simen valgte räv-G' (semen chose arse-G - for example instead of moving away) or 'Vergewaltigung' = 'rape'. The couple split. It seems that AIDSHIV was set in circulation by injections against hepatitis-B in Greenwich Village in New York in november 1978, when Hauge first attempted suicide and was hospitalized, and then with another round of injections in San Francisco and Los Angeles around the time in february 1980 when Hauge succeeded with his suicide. If one can assume a systematic relation of some sort between these names of my 1977 neighbours and the global pandemic which has claimed some 100 million lives or thereabout, then one cannot speak about 'fair play' from the SECRET SERVICES who seem to be those who are most interested in seeing it continue. How can I withstand such a pressure? The names tell that I cannot afford a loan to move elsewhere and if I prefer to remain in Zinckgasse, the burden of the AIDSHIV is added to the pressure on me by not moving away - possibly in spite of the semantics of the graffiti and the electric short circuitry and the ventilator breakdown after I had moved in - apparently suggesting that I prefer to become homo rather than moving elsewhere.

I certainly do not want to be homo. I hope the problems can be solved before this is coming to be a real problem - adding to the 'evidence' in the accumulated fat under the nipple?

I add that 'ferge-valtigung' sounds like the 'toppling' of the Costa Concordia ferry in Italy.

There were some people in Venice after I had signed the contract which reminded me of US presidents - and it was either then PM Gordon Brown or a good copy of him who stepped onto the train when I moved up to Zinckgasse - and that is something.

I dont know if there could be further factors in the question of staying or moving out. For example, is ZINC of some systematic importance for the LACKSCHUH problemshift? Things like that.

For moving out I could need money. I have written a book called 'POLAKK English Bloggi' which could have been a superseller if the circumstances had allowed for it - every student of literature and scholars in most fields of study could be in need of it for understanding the new conceptualization of time, including scholars in the natural sciences - but it is not even seriously published. I could have earned much money had it been published seriously. Is it that with some more money it would have been easy for me to move out of Zinckgasse? But if I cannot move easily out the 'services' hope to be able to blame me for problems which they have created?

These are problems and questions that I can articulate only now, 5 years after I moved in. Nobody had said a word and the graffitis in Venice could not help me much then - it is only today that I can understand them. Let me hurry to add that I have still not got any official word that could support these speculations of mine - and for a poet there are always many other and much better explanations than such apparently 'farfetched' political speculations. For example, since I have moved on the average once every year throughout my life, an excellent explanation is that 5 years is an exceptionally long time for me and the reason for what is felt as burdens on my being on this location is that the ghosts of childhood and later traumas could now have started to become difficult to subdue. Do I only try and project traumatic problems onto other people - and therefore construct these gigantomaniac explanations with presidents and all sorts of things? Ah, there walks the problem... It must be understood what the SMOLENSK aircrash was with the 100 top leaders of POLANDsk. There was some gunshots heard in the house some years ago - and does that mean that this SMINKGASSE contains heavyweight rebuilt vips of various sorts? And the secrets are so sky high that nothing can get them out?

I cannot decide on these fantastic problems and explanations. Have seen the US president on TV and believes he was raped by him many years ago? All this would be classified as shiningly paranoid if it were not for the evidence in Kursk, Cole, Borten.

I must also add that I have no real reasons to believe that neither any daughters of mine had a sexual intercourse with me nor that Clinton or anybody else (such as Skundberg) had raped me in 1973 - but there is the overall structure of the story which suggests these ideas. Manhattan 2001, the film 'The artist', things like that.

Conclusion

There are reasons to believe that the 'project' could be to cheat the public with empty word games and short circuitry which the public cannot reject because they have no access to the secrets - and that is why they cannot protest against the conception that one person is 'the same' as another person in some important respect - and with modern medical science the rebuilt copies can be made so good that it is hard to see the difference. It is this strategy which lends unconstitutional (but quasi-constitutional-looking) power to the secret services.

There is one way to stop this very dangerous development - and that is in downgrading the secrets of history. The politicians can do that. Then they lose some of the power which they otherwise could have got from the secret services - but they regain a democratic basis for their powers. Some politicians would do the opposite - create new secrets of history for making more service power which they can borrow from - and that is the dangerous development.

Downgrading secrets is not an insult against the majesty. The people have the right to get the truth of history.

I wrote the article mainly on thursday 7 may. As the news from friday showed, the day when I published this, the work could have been tapped by the secret services. What happens when the services (more or less generally) tap my work - the databases in my workspace - illegally? It could lead to the same swap function as I have described here which means that I could come to fall into disgrace in libraries and other databases which could be of importance to me - quite simply because of the illegal behaviour of the 'services'.

Added on 11 may 2015:

I add that it could have been a step forwards for me - on the background of e.g. Per Borten and the role assigned to Norway from other viewpoints - to get a new citizenship. In Austria there is the rule for EU or 'european economic zone' (EÖS) member states that one must have had a 6 years 'ununterbrochene Aufenthalt' for qualifying for austrian citizenship. (There must probably be 6 years before the application and then the answer comes half a year later - cp. Betancourt's 6,5 years in confinement within borders). One has to sign on the last line of the application that 'I hereby confirm that I have been without interruption inside the borders of Austria for the last 6 years' - SIGNATURE. True, there is a box in the form for filling in exceptions to this rule, if one nevertheless has been abroad a little, could be for funerals or whatever, but then why this formulation? If it were not about labelling the signing person a SWINDLER if he has been for a one hour shopping trip to Bratislava, why this 'ununterbrochene'? One guesses that if there is another person who has been in a similar circumstance of having to sign on a statement of identity and citizenship which is perhaps non-trivial, would this strange 'ununterbrochene' serve to swap me with that other person as far as SWINDLE is concerned? Clearly I cannot sign on any such statement.