Why the gynaecomastia in political history since 1917?

Why the gynaecomastia in political history since 1917?

John Bjarne Grover

The reason for gynaecomastia in political history since 1917 could be based on a helpless joke - the real reason I have described under 'World Peace after Syria 2011-2018' (search for '48 sonnets' - if 'labour' be defined in the interaction between my blue and red metres and if this be the basis for new economic concepts in extension from technologies on the new formalisms in the collective consciousness and memory, then the shape of the red metre is of course of vital importance). The helpless joke is in the observation that a man with gynaecomastia will tend to bend his spine and chest a little forwards in order to create the impression that the blub is due to some natural fat folds and not a disturbance of gender characteristics - while the bisibisi joke tells that it is due to lack of 'uprightness', that is immoral behaviour. British or general monarchic interests out for borrowing political power from chinese divine signification can then point to the word 'hygienic' which in chinese is 'weishengde' composed of 'wei' which looks like a 'T' serving as a gallows and meaning 'guard', 'sheng' looking like the ribs and spine of a man with a blub on the lefthand side (if seen from behind), meaning 'to give birth to a child', 'sprout', 'grow', plus the modern morph 'de' which is a genitive/partitive like english 'of'. Hence if 'sheng' is taken to mean 'body', there is a 'bodyguard' in the construction, like Hitler's blackshirts. In my 'Der Dornenstrauch' (= DDS) the 'satellite' (chinese 'weixing', written like 'weisheng' but with a head on top of the chest/spine with leftside blub) occurs just before the end where the burning thornbush can be seen by the inspired reader - which means that the gynaecomastia could have been chosen in order to make Hitler look like the divine revelation of the thornbush - the flames being the divine presence (according to the official version, Hitler was rolled into a 'scroll' of a carpet after his suicidal death in the Berlin bunker, carried out in the scroll and burnt in flames in the backyard), the bush being the 'medium'. Cp the 'georgebush' as a republican phenomenon. Grøver/'Mengele's assistant chief doctor was called Gard Nykvist ('guard new-twig'). The link to the gynaecomastia is in the 'weiss-heng'.

Now chinese 'spine' in the sense of 'backbone' = 'ji-zhui-gu' which sounds like a corrupted (bent spine) version of 'ci-shuji-zhen'. The word 'spine' has an additional three forms: 1) 'ci' = thorn, splinter, stab, assassinate, irritate, criticise, 2) 'ji' = spine, backbone, ridge, in the combination 'shuji' = secretary ('shu' = write, book, letter, document), and 3) 'zhen' = needle, stitch. The 'ji' sign looks like what in norwegian is called 'stabburet'. Clearly this opens for the 'bent spine' (not secretarian 'upwrite') in a life of drinking and whoring such as expounded in the 'bad reading' vs 'good reading' of the fragment from the Talmud discussed in chapter 16 of my vol.3.

There is the idea that Mao could haved sacrificed himself with such an end - by coitus with a female with 'thermometre' in the vagina (cp. the role of 'Stift Melk' and Hitler's cabinet). That would have been for being the archetypal 'bent spine' of China. But why?

The answer is found in my DDS with its catalogue of mysteries - assuming that a chinese radical is found in the difference between absolute and relative enumeration of the poems - a difference resembling chomskyan phrase structures. The chinese sign 'de' = 'of' = genitive/partitive can be seen as composed of two of the new postwar radicals of the 188 inventory: The first part is radical 125 while the second part is radical 20. The latter (radical 20) is most prominent in the sign for 'shao' which means spoon, ladle, while radical 125 is the same as the sign 'bai' which means snow-white, clear, pure, white, gratis. In DDS there is the absolute-relative difference 20 in poem relative #74 = absolute #94, and the absolute-relative difference 125 is found in relative #12a = absolute #137 (the absolute enumeration of the 'mirror half' on its way down). Poem relative #74 (absolute #94) can be seen to tell of the chinese sign 'heng' = groan, hum - which could mean 'SOB' - while poem relative #12a (absolute #137) could mean or associate with 'BOR' - for the SOB-i-BOR mystery which probably tells of jewish-philosophical resurrection (see relative #118) - and which Hitler seems to have borrowed for corrupted use in his 'Sobibor' death camp.

This means that if Mao let himself be sacrified in a 'bent spine' manner, thereby representing the archetypal chinese after the war (according to Hitler's assumed program), it meant in actual fact a reconstitution of the cosmic mystery of resurrection = uprightness of the spine by the new radical system of 188 elements: It takes an upright spine to understand a cosmic mystery - while a spine bent due to immoral behaviour means an inability to understand the cosmic mystery. Since the difference between the old and the new radical system here means just the reconstitution of the uprightness of the spine, it also means that the spines of the chinese people using the 188 system after the war were as upright as never before - even if Hitler could have been badly pleased with the victory against Mao.

It is my DDS which tells this - without this book of mine (with its two enumerations) it may be difficult to see how and why a potential self-sacrifice of Mao could have served to rescue the chinese people and culture from the abusive borrowing of (apparently) royalist craving for more power and authority. But within the chinese culture this solution would probably have been intuitively felt.

My view is that the historic mythos-function of gynaecomastia has a very different reason - captured in the irrational logic of vols. 1 and 3 qua wings of the angel Abraham (his body/spine being in vol.2) as far as the '48 sonnets' of mine (see vol.3 chapter 19) are concerned: These interpret the interface to divine-controlled history or even eternity/infinity (on basis of TEQ book 5) where TEQ book 16 interprets historic time in the socio-political interface of inner 'divine' articulations. This matter is likely to be the leftsided gynaecomastia if it occurs symmetrically in the left side wing as well - in which case it would create an extra blub there. But political intrigue understood this in terms of the childish joke (weiss-heng) on 'weishengde' = 'hygienic'.

It is unfortunate if this has been a fundamental concept in the construction of the new world since MacDonald - leading to a fundamental constitutive function for e.g. italian 'carta igienica' = 'toilet paper' for use in childish jokes. Or connected with the idea of 'transgender' phenomena - cp. the 'Manning' case at the end of Obama's period (the last paper Obama signed as president?) and the question whether change in the body's genetics can take place over time or if it happens overnight, so to speak. The art of folding, glueing, shaping paper was called 'pappsløyd' in my primary school (I think there was at least one lesson of it per week) - it has later become a part of my life such as when I made the 30 copies of my 3 volumes in 2012-2013 - but indeed the world looks a little helpless if it be not able to have my works published in a better way.

There is also the Schengen agreement. Why Schengen? Could be it tells of the cultural problems in this 'weiss-heng-de' and tries to turn it back into 'wei-sheng-de'. In norwegian there is something called 'skjenken', though, meaning 'the sideboard' (a piece of furniture) - or maybe it can mean 'the gift'. ('Gift' is also norwegian for 'poison' or 'married'). 'Why skjenke de[t]?' = 'why donate it?' 'En person uten sidestykke' = 'a person without a sideboard', 'an exceptional person without comparison'. Hopefully the Schengen agreement is not about lifting unfortunate associations from everybody in culture except me. The idea of considering me a sort of Jesus given gratis to mankind is not consonant with my own conception - but that does not mean that I am Satan. Rather I take it that the divine revelation is given in the text (TEQ) I have written - and then the books must be published - not my person given out 'gratis' to mankind via the generous hands of the surveillance services. (The issue of economic compensation or 'billighetserstatning' for the history could be about this). Do I not have the right to my intellectual property because of 'immoral behaviour' - signified or 'proven' by leftsided gynaecomastia? Should it mean that it is the international secret intelligence services who rightfully claim these rights? Of course not - it is an integrated part of human reality that it be redundant like a 'lapis philosophorum' - that is how the relation between spiritual and substantial reality is for humans.

It happened soon after I had completed the making of the 30 copies of each of the three volumes I self-published in early 2013 that the parquet in the main room at the windowed door of my studio flat in Zinckgasse curled up like mackerel in the frying pan - or like my left hand after 23 february 2002. Chinese for 'parquet' = 'pinhua diban' - while the 'window/vindue[t] divine' can be spelt out in chinese signs as

wen = literary composition, civil, script
hua = blossom, multicoloured, expend
di = position, place, ground
wan = bowl

or, simply, if 'wen' is what leads you when you are led (such as me when I believed that an angel took me by my hand to guide my way), the form 'winhua divan' can mean 'Lead lushions in a bowl' - the title to my TEQ book 12 (written in 2000-2001 - the title may have been written on 19 june 2001 if not in late 2000). The title is very close to the exact mid point (counting pages) of my 1881-page edition of my vol.2 = TEQ - the title page is on p.949 which is 8,5 pages after the exact mid - but the beginning of book 12 is exceptional in TEQ by having the 16 pages which were written last moved to the beginning of book 12 - or 17 pages if title page is included - like 'curled-up' parquet, so to speak. This phenomenon tells of a certain assymmetry - in the case of the parquet it means a virtual but not real assymmetry of the 'wings' of volume 1 (1266 pages) and volume 3 (1264 pages) around volume 2 (1881 pages). I notice also the chinese governments after 2000 - see also the article on MacDonald on the title poem #198 to TEQ. Clearly this is how the relation between spiritual and substantial reality is - reflected in the difference between divine- and human-controlled history - and that is the real reason (see vol.3 chapter 19 for the 48 sonnets in relation to Rilke and Shakespeare) for the concern with gynaecomastia in the historical intrigue - while the silly joke about the upright spine of chinese and its 'wei-sheng-de' read as 'weiss-heng-de' is only a pretext which has led to a recognition of this relation between spiritual and material reality as being about gynaecomastia.

War is a bad thing and if the intrigue were constructed around 1917, it means that World War I is still haunting the world with its afterwaves of distrust. It is wise to realize this and downtune the hysteria around certain intrigue components. The chinese society found a clever solution for re-incorporating the cosmic mysteries - but a pity it is if the traditional 214 system shall have an aftertaste of Hitler and therefore had to be replaced with a new 188-element one. The conclusion could be that the whole historic construction since 1917 is based on a bad misconception of Jesus as 'loopaper' suffering for the wellbeing of the others - and that China is credited with this obvious misconception which seems to threaten the spirituality of the whole western culture - and could be this threat even was recognized by Hitler as 'the substantial presence of jews', hence his attempt to remove this substantial presence in order to battle the threat from China - thereby lending a quasi 'justification' to lifting the chinese political power potential of 'divinity' over onto european or even british monarchism.

"It is wise to realize this and downtune the hysteria around certain intrigue components" - if this 'hysteria' is taken (by postwar distrust) to mean the innermost 'hard core' of cardboard in the 'pappsløyd' of loopaper scrolls, with their 'winding stair' spiralling shape, it could be wise also to understand the futility in this misconception which really could be about the relation between the mid 'hygienic' and end 'Ausgeschnittenes' (with the spiralling 'Sich-Laufendes') in the poem 'In einem alten Buch' by Kavafis. To repeat hitlerish history 100 years later is not right and is not what the first line tells. I do not believe that Kavafis was homosexual (or that this poem can be taken to be about rape of a small child = step 2 in a 1-2-3 after Syria 2011-2018) - a closer study of the original in his greek suggests that he may have played on the ambiguity of gender in greek declinations but not because of a hidden homosexuality. 'Homo' strategy (in business, politics, media) can be very bad, very destructive - and could also be a way of signalling the message 'we want to murder you and replace you with an identical copy'. That is postwar distrust. There probably do exist real homos and those poor people clearly can come to suffer much from the homophobia naturally whipped up by such business homo strategies - which could be just a way of 'fitting' (= 2) the hysteric 'pappsløyd' (= 1) down on the political intrigue (= 3). Since the innermost hardcore scroll is open in the other end, an injected spurt would be 'nothing' - like some believe can be said about chinese radicals (essentially nothing more than a practical way of finding the word in a dictionary) - not to be confused with the chinese 'divine power'. It is all this foggy misconceptional way of thinking strategies which burdens Europe down, not a 'threat' from China or presence of jews.

"'Wei' which looks like a 'T' serving as a gallows and meaning 'guard', 'sheng' looking like the ribs and spine of a man with a blub on the lefthand side (if seen from behind), meaning 'to give birth to a child'" - hence 'son of man' and silly jokes. There seem to be quite a lot of silly jokes in the foundations of western culture throughout the last 100 years - and the reason for that could be just in the role of these years as empty rumble. But such silly jokes can be felt as quite threatening to the spiritual life if their fundamental role is taken to tell that there is nothing below or beyond these - and that could be the demagogy which attempts to dump this spiritual despair on chinese religion claiming 'nothingness' to be the utmost goal of spiritual life.