What PTRSIM PIK really is

John Bjarne Grover

The PTRSIM PIK program was probably constructed by royal power after the french revolution in order to find some justification for the royals which the republicans could not offer - and that was the idea of a divine aspect of their power. It took on the form of a construction of children with Stammbaum imitating certain verses from the Bible (say, for imitating a verse 'Ah, mein Herr, warum...' they could couple a woman from Aachen with a danish priest from Værum) in such a way (by the selection of verses - given a certain division line, appr 1071 words occur twice and only twice in Genesis - in certain verses, with ach und warum etc - and map with some relevance onto the 1071 verses of the gospel of Matthew - at least this is the construction format I have come to understand) that the community believed that it was Messiah who was born, and then a 'politician' came and opened the head of the newborn and spurted own semen on its brain and thereby the roles turned around (by this 'inside-out') and the people believed that the politician was Messiah - a ray of power from heaven which the republicans could not offer.

However, it seems that the whole story can be summed up in the simple formula:

They let out flatulences and blame the weather gods for the bad smells and then they feel divine.

The real story is what I call the fundamental theorem of linguistics: 'Two and only two items can be the same across different realities'. This short formula has a great potential for new knowledge and can open up new sciences and technologies, but it is held in control with the PTRSIM PIK program - by very trivial identities:

funda = the region of the intestinal gases (or 'weather')
mental = the spiritual factor, the weather gods
theorem = the 666 (diagonal replacement) dirty beast of the revelation, the blame
linguistics = the meaningful sounds, the 'feeling'

I have over and over launched the republican claim: "The PTRSIM PIK program must be packed down and its secrets brought to public daylight". This is just how they are immune against this criticism: The flatulences are 'packed' (down there) for the meaningful sounds, the daylight = the weather gods etc - which leaves only 'blame' to the 'PTRSIM PIK'.

Heraclitus was aware of this weakness in the human constitution - here concatenated in my translation wherein I have added the original 'sulphur':

D/K      
5



119

78



86


79

Fragment
And praying to those sculptures of the gods,
just like somebody chatting with a house,
not knowing of the gods or heroes
who they are:
The accustomed place
is the human's daimon.
The accustomed thing
of the humans
has no meaning for their minds,
but it has a certain sulpherous divinity,
and most of the sulpherous divine
shuns their disbelief
in order that it shall not know.
The speechless man
has listened to his daimon
just like the child
who has listened to a man.

Fragments 78 and 86 share the form θειων which is genitive plural of either 1) θειος = gods, divine or 2) θειον = sulphur, brimstone. Hence these fragments of Heraclitus can mean equally 'of sulphurs' or 'of divines' and probably both at the same time - and it is difficult to avoid a certain association between the 'sculptures of the gods' with the forms of the outdoor loo. This 'brimstone' is also likely to be recognized as 'Prekestolen'.

I notice also a reference in Liddell & Scott's 'Greek-English lexicon' Oxford 1890 p.668 under the article θεος the form θυραι θεωτεραι:

'Mo[the]r used by the gods' could invoke associations to the beginning lines of 'Rilke's Duino elegies' - but then in the sense of 'the gates that mother used when she gained access to the gods'. Did the organizers of the nazi intrigue seem to try to make the people of the world perverse?

Hence the whole PTRSIM PIK program seems to be a confusion of the important fundamental theorem of linguistics with this old human problem of divine power recognized in the royal - even in Heraclitus as follows by fragments: 5 = funda, 119 = mental, 78 = theorem, 86 = of, 79 = linguistics. But clearly such identities are cheap tricks only, however difficult to take (or 'pack down') untill one has seen the connection.

It is just to realize it: The fundamental theorem of linguistics is of extreme importance for the development of the new knowledge, while this old confusion of it with a basic problem of humans in their understanding of divine power in the royal is completely irrelevant and an old dirty trick based on re-cursive (!) diagonal replacement mixmax of superficial and very inessential similarities with the serious theoretic matters of metaphysics. The important fundamental theorem does in fact seem to be suppressed by this political program and the culture is suffering under the burden of silly jokes instead of serious studies.

If they say that I am PTRSIM PIK, I say that I am not those silly jokes and there are no devils or angels or demons or animals in my Stammbaum - there are only normal people and the whole concept is probably uninteresting. The value it had for power was that it incorporated the important ideas on fundamental matters and made it look as if it was royal power that could offer these things - but clearly those ideas have nothing to do with royals. Also, attempts to create a 666 for pasting it onto somebody - such as e.g. the declining effect of the vaccines against covid-19 is not due to a '666 dirty beast' - is also only a result of this confusion of the silly with the serious.





© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 4 march 2022