Secrets of politics?

Secrets of politics?

John Bjarne Grover

People may think that Israel seem a little hard to understand these days - maybe unless some secrets of politics be told.

What are the secrets of politics?

In the following I will make some assumptions which are non-trivial but which seem to constitute a coherent whole with considerable explanatory force. I cannot find out if they correspond to some factual reality - but tell them for reasons of being potentially important for understanding some complexes which otherwise can be difficult to understand - if, that is, there is a real basis for them.

Assumption #1: Hitler was an agent for England ('or something like that') and had a program of erste, zweite, dritte Reich. The 'erste Reich' was in Germany 1933-45, the 'zweite Reich' was in Norway 1969-1990, the 'dritte Reich' will then be assumed to be in England. This assumption of a non-german origin of Hitler is not really surprising - Hitler waged war against 'everybody' and had to lose in the end and there was not much left of Berlin. What is surprising is that this assumption is still not near the surface of the official historic account.

Assumption #2: That I was constructed as a 'messianic' genetic Stammbaum (for the role of PTRSIM PIK applied to the border region between Egypt and Israel) - a Stammbaum which it would be easy to role-swap with for politics to appear in the collective consciousness as a new Messiah - and that the program for the erste-zweite-dritte Reich is for Hitler's political interests to swap such roles with me - also for the program of regaining integrity after WWII and for dumping the blame for his war crimes on me.

Assumption #3: Hitler was planned before the war (1925 when Christiania changed name to Oslo?) to be 'siliconized' at the end of the war and to be my official custody father in Norway for at least some time in order to install the 'zweite Reich'. In 1969 he would have been 80 years of age and they could perhaps not in 1925 have taken it for granted that he would be up and going at the age of 100 - but in 1969 they had probably come far in rebuilding people with new fresh organs of vitality - hence it is fully possible that when my official father was replaced with a copy in 1969, the new one could have been Adolf Hitler. To this assumption one can add the theory that the plan could have been old and go back to Waterloo and Napoleon - when the state of Norway was opened with a shape which created a swastika on Europe - the opposite of Italy in the south. Hence Hitler's logo? This plan could indicate that my Stammbaum could have been built on what was available in those days and been finetuned for this role during the intermediate generations. And of course for this general plan it may not have been vital that Hitler continued as the same person through the three 'Reichs' - of course the role could have been planned to be taken over by a person from a younger generation.

Assumption #4: If it should so bad that one also has to assume that my official custody mother had been Heinrich Himmler in a previous identity, rebuilt to woman around 1957 perhaps (if that were possible in those days?), then it is possible to guess that an injection of horror chemicals in me in Hammerfest on e.g. 20 january 1959 when I was 18 months old could have been done by the one who was responsible for the holocaust. (The custody parents have admitted that I nearly died from an allergic attack in those days but claim that I did it myself by putting a nut in the mouth - otherwise I have no proof that such an injection took place). That means that for me to be growing up under such custody would have included the theory that the horror were an accident only and not pure evil. Then some well-prepared details from the room where it happened - say, a book pulled half way out of the bookshelf or a lampshade turned upside down - could be used for wriggling and pushing on my feeling of security and balance of wellbeing later in life - say, a discussion on some academic topic could have been drawn a little too far out, or something self-evident was turned around to its opposite - that would put me in a bad mood - in particular if it included bodily proximity. This would then be a principle of 'political power' - which even could have been the entire purpose with the holocaust when my biological parents as the basis for my existence were jews - since it would be a maximal implementation of 'power' by physically present body. Could be some would call it 'executive power' - Himmler was Hitler's interior minister. Likewise, when I and my younger sister stood at the bookshelf in Labråten (in probably the early 1980's) on a distance of some 50-100 cm and (I think it was the same christmas evening when she also said 'people seem to think we are very strange') she used the word 'nærkamp' (= 'close fighting'), it is not impossible that this was the reason for the attack on the twin towers (bookshelf shape?) on Manhattan on 11 september 2001. Of course if a book were drawn half out of the bookshelf this shelf could have been in my visual field when the injection happened in 1959.

Assumption #5: An even more far-reaching assumption is that the entire holocaust could have been constructed for this political program - and when I was unemployed for two years after my MA degree in 1992, it could have been preplanned since long ago that I would get a faculty stipend in Bergen for my PhD studies from 1995 onwards - hence Himmler's Bergen-Belsen concentration camp for this stipend for 'pelsen' in 'Bergen'. 'Treblinka' in norwegian means the wound in a tree's bark cut by the forester's axe for telling that it should be felled - and hence it is my name on the form 'Jump Jarnegg Grover'. It would also mean that I would be 'blamed' with the war crimes of Bergen-Belsen and Treblinka because I accepted the faculty stipend there: This could be called the dirty beast of the revelation - as a trick for the blame-dumping strategies. 'Neuengamme' concentration camp could tell of my adobe house in Szolnok - where it was difficult to get water and drain in - hence e.g. 'Braunschweig' subcamp (for the outdoor loo) etc. I was probably scheduled to write poetry there - hence the 'Meppen-Versen' subcamp. The house has apparently sunk (but was probably built that way) some 10-15 cm in one corner, hence 'Dalum' subcamp etc. But another cheap adobe house nearby with water and drain could have been acquired - it was in the intersection Raba/Szava Utca - hence 'Ravensbrück' concentration camp. The big death camps were probably (as I have guessed) named after the most precious jewish-philosophical secrets. One guesses that 'Auschwitz' originally could be among the most precious secrets for judaism - and hence if there were an injection of horror chemicals in Hammerfest one can guess that this would have been the Auschwitz concentation camp complex. For my theory that what were in the visual or sensory field in that moment would have been the method of power, I notice that a lampshade turned around could be the Auschwitz subcamp 'Lichterwerden' and a book pulled halfway out of the bookshelf could have been the subcamp 'Eintrachtshütte'. 'Buchenwald' could then have been the bookshelf itself - and the attack on Manhattan 11 september 2001 could have been about the attempt to push the book into the shelf again - like sinking the injection in through the skin. It is possible that this is a function assigned to 'Zinckgasse'. In fact the whole holocaust could have been about this single moment - by Paul Celan it could have been on 20 january 1959. That would have been the assumed 'zweite Reich'.

If Adolf Hitler - for this 'zweite Reich' - took the place of my first father in 1969, why so late? He would have been 80. There could be a philosophy of 21 years as the limit for getting the crimes off - and hence he would have spent the years 1948-1969 with learning norwegian and some medical knowledge, rehearsing the new role etc. He died officially on 27 november 1990 (maybe plus/minus a day), that is 21 years later - and it is 160 years exactly after the Madonna of Paris and exactly in the mirror image to the birth of the youngest daughter of the shah of Persia around the shah's own death. 1990 + 21 years = 2011, the year of the socalled 'arab spring' revolutions (after Kyrgyztan 2010 there followed Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria) and the Oslo terror. It is likely to have marked the preparatory onset of the 'dritte Reich' - which then perhaps is planned to reach full blossoming in 2032 or 2033 - a hundred years after Hitler coming to power. I have no knowledge of these things, though - I am only guessing.

I could of course in 1969 not accept the replacement of the father without an explanation (although of course I could not protest but had to tell myself that there probably was a goodenough explanation and I had to suppress the problem from my consciousness) but it seemed that the mother pretended that there was nothing peculiar - and I could probably not exclude the theory of a dirty plot against the first father. (I had not got a goodenough orientation from him). However, my teeth - except for the 8 front low - were destroyed by the school dentist 1970-71 which told of the possibility of letting words over their fence. The Juklerød case told what would happen if the theory of a new father were to be launched - it could lead to forced psychiatric detention only on a diagnosis of paranoia. There were many of these, probably, and I did not get the new father's identity. I had probably the right to this on my 16th birthday 29 june 1973 but got it not - but (to repeat it once again) the israeli ambassador to Maryland was shot on that day and the palestinian intelligence chief the day after. The Yom Kippur war broke out some weeks later and could have told what I needed to know - that 'kippur' in norwegian sounds like 'slippers' and hence the John Slippers war: It lasted from 6 october untill 26 october - and the birthday of John Grøver was 27 october - hence he 'slipper' = 'did not have to partake in the war'. It means 'Yom Kippur' = 'John Grøver' = 'Idle Feetler' = 'Adolf Hitler'. If this were a way of telling just this, it should have been contained in the details of the war (I have not studied those). The names of James Earl Carter = Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale likewise told about the replacement on the ferry station in 1969. But these details is not the same as telling it right out and I continued living in this double reality of having to accept the new father as the real father untill 21 december 2022 when I finally sent an email to the norwegian police telling that I believed that he had been replaced with a copy in 1969.

The Hamas attack on Israel came on 7 october 2023 which was the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur war PLUS ONE DAY - which is that day after my 16th birthday when the palestinian intelligence chief was shot.

Assumption #6: The attack of Hamas could have been because I sent the email to the norwegian police in 2022 - and hence it would have been in defence of Hitler aiming at his 'dritte Reich' (of, say, 2033-2045). But clearly that Adolf Hitler is not in the interest of the palestinian people - although it could be that the palestinian people is in the interest of Adolf Hitler.

However, this should have been easily pronounced. What is it that Israel will not tell in public?

For once, the erste-zweite-dritte Reich is not told at all if it is the story. Why isnt this told? There must have been a goodenough reason why the world has accepted it without releasing the secret. What should have been a goodenough reason for Hitler and the world war and the holocaust?

I have fancied the following possible explanation to the 'austrian Hitler' (from England):

Assumption #7: Austria could have had or maybe even still could have a 'ballroom' culture which consists in a platonic strategy for taking your interests - you are interested in something and then something else happens elsewhere which leads to a third event which creates platonic difficulties and bluntedness for you in your interests - and which thereby also leads to an annexation of your interests into the austrian culture. It would have been the platonic format which makes it impossible to take it. You have always trusted grandmother but why does she suddenly appear in your inner mind with such strange ears and teeth - talking a little rudely? The theory is then the following - that this leads to nervousness in the global collective consciousness in the form of conflict arising elsewhere in the world. The history could then have been that the two world wars was for getting this austrian culture problem under control - because it would have been absolutely essential to get it under control for reaching a new global state of goodness-driven economy in the third millenium. The centuries before these world wars would have been french, spanish, portuguese, british colonialism in an attempt to take these remote effects from the then austrian empire in Europe - but Austria themselves did not have colonies. This colonialism would then gradually have been narrowed in to the world wars which was for the final grip on the throat of the austrian culture problem. The use of horror-chemical injections in maltreatment of individuals could be a phenomenon with a similar effect - could be it leads to despair and conflicts elsewhere in the world. If such chemical methods (very raw persecution that would have been) were used and were the reason why the eastern regions of Ukraine wanted to be russian rather than ukrainian, the current ukrainian war could be for just such similar reasons - if that abuse were going on, that is - and Russia early told (2022?) that Ukraine has to be demilitarized and denazified. The philosophy for those who could have used chemical horror against individuals could be (if the consciousness of the victim is lost immediately upon injection of the horror chemicals) that 'the soul is shot right up and there is nobody who suffers from this - and it helps in government because it makes things run more smoothly and creates support in the people'. But such 'pure evil' would lead to nervousness and conflicts elsewhere in the world - and the purpose with the current war could then be to take this problem by leading the conflicts back Ukraine where it came from (if such methods were in use there - I know nothing about that) for thereby solving the problem where it came from instead of starting a new round of colonialism and world wars. My ideas of abuse of cognitive surveillance data (on an austrian-ukrainian axis), in e.g. advertisement, could have been about just that 'platonic blunting of my interests'.

This would have been the socalled 'goodenough reason' why the story of Hitler has not been told but has remained as an essential political secret: It would have been for taking the austrian culture (or, rather, the phenomenon itself) by the fact that it produced Hitler - and then the fact that Hitler was a briton designed as austrian for lending a goodenough reason to take them. If the story leaks out, then the goodenough reason does not function since it was a british holocaust and warfare and it could come out wrong - and for making global peace and goodness-driven economy in the third millenium this intermediate stage with respected secrecy would have been necessary. The secrecy on the status of Hitler would then have been a necessary trick for making the global opinion say no thanks to the austrian-cultural background of Hitler - for thereby providing the necessary basis for a goodness-driven economy.

These speculations could be the reason why the world has accepted the untold status of the Hitler story - if that is different from the official version. That includes Israel - who agreed to keep their mouths shut about the story since there was a goodenough reason - and indeed it was because the austrian Hitler had made the holocaust that there should be no more of this cultural problem. Furthermore, a part of the program with the holocaust would have been for establishing the state of Israel on that upper corner of the Red Sea which correlates with the eustachian tube up to the round window of the ear (source) - as discussed in this file - it is possible that the austrian platonic problem could be recognized as being acoustically recognized as this 'ear trumpet' location by the round window. Therefore it was vital that the victims of the holocaust were credited with this holy land after the war - and that should suffice for telling what the real problem was. The extreme interest which the Middle East crisis constitutes could be seen as having its acoustic correlate by the Red Sea 'eustachian tube' (or 'femur ball' or even 'ballroom'?) form up at the border between Egypt and Israel.

But with the attack of Hamas on 7 october 2023 it is possible that Israel got into panic - that the whole program is not really for making this goodness-driven economy at all but on the contrary for being the smartest trick ever for making something even worse than the problem which should have been solved by agreeing to the secrecy on the topic - a global kingdom of terror-and-monkey-business - and this nervousness would have been the real reason for the current war against the Hamas members of Gaza. Could it have been even what triggered the bombing of Palestine also in christmas 2008?

The current israeli war against Palestine can therefore in actual fact be a war against this potentially oversmart trick from the western world. The secrecy on the status of Hitler would have been acceptable only as long as this went the right way - which includes that final point that not only goodness is needed for that new economy but also truth - and then the respect for the secrecy on the topic could have been hazard. It could be about a smart trick for getting e.g. british-monarchic global control - which need not be much better than the austrian variant - but it could also be about an old european political struggle only.

The fact could be that the austrian culture (if such a particular trait exporting problems to other parts of the world is the origin of these 'goodenough reasons') could perhaps not have been taken earlier - but it can now by way of the extremely sophisticated surveillance technology which is giving new form to culture all over the world. In the time since Hitler the world has been busily concerned with developing this surveillance technology - which also means that passwords for internet can soon be superfluous (even for internet banking) since every single human is constantly recognized - and it is probable that even the mental state of the indivuals is recorded.

Then there is no longer any basis for this overly smart (british?) trick and then the time has come to tell the whole story - including the 'goodenough reasons'. Otherwise the story could be the worst ever - and then the new information and surveillance technology could come out as only a means for these new suppression methods to make any revolution and folk-uprising protests against them impossible. Goodness cannot, as history tells, be made prevailing by way of power (abuse) - only by way of truth beyond power. The world will likely develop towards a dismantling of power - instead of going for 'the total power of a good throne' dressed up in messianic good-shepherd feathers.

Spreading evil around the world - isnt that Satan? Me assigned the role of the dirty beast in the revelation could then be about something like that. But I am only a normal person who has nothing to do with all this business. I am not the 'beast of terror' - that would have to be a label attached to those who organize the terror.

News some time ago showed surveillance evidence of Hamas-hostage Naama Levy with blood-smeared face. If the theoretic element of puberty rapes of me in drugged condition with bload-soaked sanitary towel before the face (qua 'dirty beast in the revelation') be of interest, one could of course consider it a case of hostaging - but if it be about a deliberate strategy called 'nazi madonna' (I have fancied that this could include genital organ contents transplanted from me over onto the rapist - by some doctor, palestinian or not, in control with the 'hamer' = 'sloughs' containing it) - the purpose could have been to swap roles with me - and hence 'Adolf Hitler' could have been a term shifted over onto me as 'A-doll Fitler'. But if this should have been contained in the hostaging of Levy (if she were targeted, that is), it could mean (have the 'meaning') that it was Hitler/Himmler who was hostaged in Norway - and Israel wants the hostage extradited. But then how come Hamas - if they be representatives of just these political interests in Gaza - would select such a victim? Shouldn't it have been the other way round - that it would have been Israel who would have organized it? Ah, of course, the intended conclusion could have been that it had to be Israel who had organized the attack of 7 october 2023 by way of their representatives in Hamas - but for what reason? Only for getting a goodenough pretext for more bloodshed to fuel own administration? But that would have been sheer bloodthirst only - and it would lead to an international outcry against Israel. As mentioned above, it is well possible that the road intersection Raba-Szava (in Szolnok) for the Rava-Szaba construction could have been the immediate reason for Himmler's Ravensbrück concentration camp during 'erste Reich' - in preparation for these puberty rapes in the 'zweite Reich' - for Ravens-Brück, cp. also the Brigitte Tengs case in Norway. 'Tenk' = 'think', 'tarmer' = 'intestines'. This international outcry against apparent sheer bloodthirst would of course turn the roles relative to Hitler and Himmler. See also the brief comments for 26 november 2023 - I quote the following - and notice that the 'box on his ear' also could be seen as relevant to 11 september 2001 on Manhattan if it were about 'books in the air' - that is, the 'bookshelf' concept for 11 september 2001 (see also 'brief comments' for 6 may 2024):

I could tell this story which I may perhaps have told before on this web page: It was in probably the first half of the 1970's that the one who was in the role of my custody father after 1969 came out from the washing room next to the room where the freezer was (in the room where I think that I had found the hairpin which led to a possibly unfortunate accident) - as far as I remember, he carried something on his shoulder - a cardboard box or a scroll or something like that - probably a cardboard box. (I think I am fairly certain about this memory but find it convenient to add that I am perhaps not 100 but maybe some 90 and some percent certain, could be 95 or so). As he went through the room I asked him if he had ever considered another name than Grøver when he changed from Jensen in 1946 and he answered 'yes, he had considered the name John Erving'. He said this in the moment when he put his foot on the lower step of the stairway up to the floor above. Since 'karm' means an edge - typically used about 'window sill' = 'vindus-karm' (cp. also Microsoft Edge in Windows), one could read the form 'stair karmer' out of this little event. Or even 'stair nodrey karmer' since his head was just next to what he had on the shoulder. If it were a box, the ring added to 1 for the 9 suggests the paradox of 'squaring the circle'. (The Birgitte Tengs case from Karmøy is another recurring media story of 'Karm' type. 'Karm-øy' = 'edge/sill-eye' - like me observing the foot on the stairway step. The place was 'Kopervik' - not 'Kippur-vik').

Now for the question: What is the secret (if any) that politics will not come out with? Is there any secret at all? Or is the secret quite simply me? There is no doubt that the earthquakes of Turkey-Syria on 6 february 2023 followed the text of at least one poem in my 'SNEEFT COEIL': Clearly if there are more than one secret, say, there could be another secret - that earthquakes can be made by artificial means with high precision (I dont know if that is indeed possible - but I noticed that Jacinda Ardern announced her resignation well before the earthquakes, giving the date as well) and hence the quakes of 6 february 2023 could have been sheer terror for mobbing my poetry as 'dirty beast of the revelation' or something like that, could be for some 'Adolf Hitler' to be swapping roles with me, then clearly respect of such secrets could constitute a very serious danger for what otherwise is talked of as 'democracy'.

But the secrets are secret and my assumptions are many and therefore it is not so easy for me to relate to these things. I would take it as interesting if my synchronic poetry includes knowledge of the seismic state of the world - see also these considerations - but clearly the quakes are not much interesting from that point of view if they were made by way of an earthquake generator (which then - if it exists - would be classified as a secret military weapon).

I still hope that my prostate and my brain are there, intact as they should be.

It is well possible that the problem is not so advanced - that the 'secret of politics', at least for the time being, is that many countries have indulged in plagiarisms of my work in my parts of the society - and this is not legal and they should have paid much money to me - but the administrations have not paid and that is the real problem. But this should be solvable. The world should not go for another COVID instead of solving this problem. It would be very unfortunate if the world glides into a new hitlerish era - even if Hitler now should appear in public with opposite values - only because the public administrations do not respect their own laws.

If the above should turn out to have some basis in reality, it is easy to see what it could have been: Such a 'reason' for a holocaust is what probably could be recognized as a 'secret intelligence project'. Even the WWII could come under that label. And clearly if there are attempts to construct a 'beast of terror', that could have to recognized as the work of 'secret intelligence'. Could be 'international secret intelligence' is the label on the whole story?

The above counts as speculations for outlining a certain complex which theoretically could be of large value for understanding some potential aspects of the current situation and which otherwise could be not understandable - it is not written for throwing doubts on anybody's integrity. Clearly this story constitutes a natural background for the above discussion.

When I tried to publish this today 28 may 2024 around 14:00 Vienna time, it turned out that my URL 'johnbjarnegrover.com' would not open but returned this apparent nonsense message instead. It seems to be a virus switch that turns http:// into https:// Something about IMF? A bad joke about Camillo-Sitte-Gasse - where some cars were parked abnormally tight yesterday and one of them had crashed?