A possible norwegian factor in the Israel-Palestine crisis

A possible norwegian factor in the Israel-Palestine crisis

John Bjarne Grover

The background is the complex discussed in the articles 'The replacement of the father', 'Goodness-driven economy as a solution to the ukrainian crisis' and 'Norwegian Labour governments in The New Yorker cartoons'.

Charles de Gaulle pulled France out of NATO in 1966. He had granted independence to Algerie in 1962: Would 'Allergie' have been a relevant association - as for that norwegian Labour governments? We were seated in the garden in Moldeliveien in Molde in probably 1966 (could be even the autumn 1965) when the father made a generous general gesture with his hand over the landscape and said that Charles de Gaulle - that is 'la gloire!'. Cp. de Gaulle's 'quarrel' with NATO - which could have concerned this 'allergie' theme. Maybe nearly a decade later the new 'father' told that he recalled from his childhood an advertisement for the electric heater 'Glo' with the text: 'Glo er god, ergo Glo'. Whether this had anything to do with the start of Gro Harlem Brundtland's political career, I dont know. But it is possible that the first father told to me that "France is your friend" while the new 'father' told that "France is a friend of Gro Harlem Brundtland". It could have been about a 'coup' in that sense of it. The rejection of my doctorate was just at the time when Gro Harlem Brundtland was appointed chief of the 'doctorate' WHO, as if she had got it 'instead of' my doctorate degree, and the forced hospitalization 1999-2000 was while she was chief of WHO. After my application for asylum in France was rejected in 2002, I found (in 2003) that I probably should move out of France again and Brundtland moved in there 'instead' - according to news she seems to have settled for a while in Provence.

One observes that 'la gloire' + 'hand gesture over the landscape' resembles 'grohar lemper rundt land' invoking the norwegian national anthem 'Ja vi elsker' with the line 'har den Herre stille lempet' - which could have received a further R/L interpretation in 'J-ens Stor-tempel-G' (see also the story of the 'J' in the sofa in Budapest in the 1980's) with additional invocation of these 'sacrosanct' allusions of the 'Big Tempel' in the 'chemical' story - a highly unsuitable association between 'holyness' and 'chemical horror'. There exists the theory that I could have been raped by Stoltenberg in Rome in 1981 (if that should have been the case, I must have been sleeping since I cannot remember anything like that): This theory would clearly relate to just this R/L variant 'J-ens Stor-tempel-G' in the sense of me (since then) being an 'odd' Stoltenberg and hence me being the 'Stor-tempel-God' = 'Big-tempel-God' = for the big tempel of St.Peters Cathedral in Rome - that is the odd god of the 'sacrosanct' chemicals of a Black Sea Loop - with a 90 degrees turning it could lead to just the Mussolini effect once again. The attempt on the pope in Rome in 1981 could then be seen as related to my presence there - it could have been on basis of the weird idea that I should be the 'real god' there and the 'papa' an attempted usurper - which then could have been lifted over onto the association of Stoltenberg's presence in 1981 'there' - in my seat, that would mean. If, furthermore, one assumes the theory of me being raped in my puberty by a 'nazi madonna', it would be this 'nazi madonna' who would be the 'real god' - 'there' in my seat - for this sick quasi-religion of a Jesus child sitting on the madonna's lap with 'trans' erection inside the behind. Of course such a phenomenon would not be much welcome in Italy - but of course it would not have been me who were the problem. I do not support or participate in such intrigues.

The norwegian national anthem 'Ja vi elsker' = 'Yes we love' could then even have been recognized in a 'Jahve/YHWH' Jelzin factor which could have been taken as a background of the 'coup' that led to Boris Jelzin in Russia, symptomatic of ideas of a 'coup' in France by the 'la gloire' factor - potentially extended to Italy by the 'big-tempel' associations. (In my ABC of politics, so called because I know little about politics, I speculate on a theoretic coup in France and in Italy). This clearly could be about the hitlerish plans of a socalled Black Sea Loop - and Hitler's assumed coup of the russian revolution by the death of Lenin in 1924 clearly could be seen as contained in these 'coup potentials' in the political implementation of the norwegian national anthem. If, therefore, Vidun Quisling were involved in the death of Lenin, there is a rather unfortunate role for Norway in this story.

If the reason - or pretext - for de Gaulle's 'quarrel' with NATO in 1966 were the plans that the father or 'papa' would be replaced with a copy in 1969 - and Celan be murdered in 1970 for the 'Doppelgänger' story which de Gaulle's intelligence service could have been involved in - it looks arguably like the 1969 replacement would have been unknown to de Gaulle in advance, in which case it hardly would have been Hitler who took the place of the first father. Clearly these 'nazi aspects' of NATO could be a substantial part of the current Ukraine war.

Speculations could, though, add the idea that if my official grandmother Laura Devold could have followed Quisling to Gorky as a 'Doppelgänger' on his wife Alexandra's passport - if Lenin were murdered, that is - it could be the explanation to why Hitler as 'Doppelgänger' on my father could have been planned anyhow - since it could have meant an extended coup of the russian revolution - see this story.

Were there reasons for a speculative theory that I could have been raped by a 'nazi madonna' in 1970-71? See this Hitler speech from 1939 (it was up in the news a few days ago) - it could be an eminent example of 'western doubletalk': He talks warmly about these 'splendid' Jews who, though, have to be 'disposed of' - the talk seems to be a clear exemplification of ideas of 'erste, zweite, dritte Reich' in the sense of himself eventually in a 'dritte Reich' being in the role of the persecuted and 'splendid' jewish people:

At 03:08-03:25 he is talking about the jewish people: "...a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land and to oust it - for it is our will to educate our own nation for these leading positions"

whereby he apparently ignores the fact that the jews were ordinary germans who had been there for centuries - while he himself had not: He had come (as 'stranger') from Austria a few years earlier and snatched all the leading positions in the country.

This seems to be the rhetoric trick throughout the speech: He tells that for the jewish people as refugees from Germany to be accepted in France, England etc these 'splendid' people had to be equipped with sufficient money from Germany - this could mean that Hitler told in this speech of 1939 that he himself would have to leave Germany in 1945 and go for the 'zweite Reich', and then he would have to take with him a substantial portion of the gold in the national reserves. Therefore his talk was brimming over with sympathies and positive words about these jewish people who needed to take some money - since it meant himself and his nazi comrades going for the 'zweite/dritte Reich'.

The official mythos tells that he and his wife Eva Braun (they had married just hours earlier or so) suicided at the end of the war and was 'disposed of' in a rolled-up carpet onto which somebody put fire in a backyard of the bunker. 'Holocaust' means 'burnt-offering'.

The theories that the 'zweite Reich' were in the form of rapes of my puberty could be recognized at 2:14 "...whipped up/out with practically only what they wore on their backs..."

But even if one understands the rhetoric tricks it leaves the listener in a bad mood to hear through such unilateral self-reinforcing cynical power.

However, there are traces of 'erste, zweite, dritte Reich' packed into the rhetoric levels of this speech - could be such 'erste, zweite, dritte Reich' were only about such rhetoric levels, which, though, later could have found their way through history? - and the relevant question could therefore be if these levels included my person. If it should have been the case, that is when the rhetoric tricks could be seen as 'embedded and embodied' in my person - in the sense of me being the odd 'big-tempel-God' self-embedded inside my behind. Clearly such nazi ideas are not welcome in Italy - and therefore if there should be attempts to engineer a new Mussolini on basis of these things, say, by the role of the house in Szolnok for a Black Sea Loop version of the story, it is urgent that these problems be not shuffled under the mat or be left untold. The story of the 'J' in the sofa in Budapest in the 1980's - told in this file - could clearly have been organized for reinforcing a 'J-ens' in the 'Stor-tempel-G'-odd function on my person.

It would be a quite essential element for understanding the potential intrigue whether there were rapes of me in my puberty (or at other times) and whether these hypothetical rapes (in drugged condition) could have been made with my own 'transplanted penis contents' (would the story of eczema and Obama's war veteran secretary be telling of such a hypothesis?). One sees how the otherwise sensible chomskyan ideas of 'self-embedding' in a 'trans-formational syntax' could have been abused for such quasi-political ideas of constructing a 'nazi madonna' by way of my person. Chomsky's theories and formal apparatus for understanding natural language is a natural part of the computer revolution and have of course nothing to do with nazi conspiracies - it is rather the other way round that nazi conspiracies probably always grab for the best parts of the developing knowledge for turning it into their perverted cynical power manifestation - as a reactionary countermovement.

Would 'trans-formational' have been a necessary concept in generative grammar - or is it only a farfetched idea lifted into grammar for resembling nazi strategies with a 'trans madonna'? It can be argued that 'transformational' means only that there is 'structure' in the data, but in the 1950-1960's the formal computer languages were under development and the object-orientation beyond the free line-pointers (of 'Basic' and other languages of the time) - telling 'IF so-and-so then GOTO this-or-that programming line' - would be an expression of this need for thinking 'transformational' - and then the big question would be whether natural language and logic would have to find a necessary isomorphy implemented into computer functionality when the computers would come to interact with the human spirit. All computer languages are push-down automata but Chomsky's claim (in his 'Syntactic structures' of 1957) is that the human spirit is phrase structure with 'self-embedding' and this is naturally susceptible to a 'transformational' description and then the transformations are not only jokes on 'any structure'. But in those days it was not normal to introduce the ideas of the human mind directly and without physical interface manipulating the functionality of the computer - that is, the immediate interaction of human reasoning into the functionality such as I have described in volume 4 pages 1253-1258 on the two computer glitsches. It is this 'ghost in the machine' which is this gap (in the discussions of those days) which is contained in Hitler's 'self-embedding' rhetoric in the sense of the 'nazi madonna' controlling the 'Jesus child' (assumed by nazi philosophy to be a sort of remote-controlled automaton - and then the story with the 'J' in the sofa in Budapest in the 1980's could typically be used as 'evidence' supporting such ideas that my behaviour was 'preprogrammed') by way of such 'self-embedding' - for a 'spiritual interaction' with the machine. The reactionary aspect of Hitler is probably that his program was to be this 'dirty beast' in the machine - hence the construction with me in that role for Hitler's possible plans of intended swap with me - and nobody wanted such a development as Hitler and therefore they did not want this new technology, could have been the demagogic logic for a reactionary program against the computer technology which started with the end of the war in 1945. Those who want a sympathetic interpretation of Hitler would probably say that he was a reminder of the idea that "we should be careful and not proceed all too quickly when developing the new technology", which of course is wise, but it is doubtful whether Hitler was the right way of saying it.

It is likely to be these aspects of the cultural situation which can be recognized in a political intrigue on the name of 'Jens Stoltenberg' relative to my person and on the background of the 1966 story with the 'la gloire!' in the garden in Molde with 'Gro Harlem Brundtland' a decade later - swapping R/L - and it could naturally be implemented in such a form that it would concern the religious questions dividing catholicism and protestantism.

An assumed international secret intelligence service program of 'nazi' type on me could have been based on this idea that I should be a remote-contolled 'automaton' writing my poetry - which they then would have fancied that they had written by remote control of me, evidenced in e.g. the story of the 'J' in the sofa in Budapest. My 'The Endmorgan Quartet' (1997-2008) is, though, evidence that this is not the case - and hence they have no rights in this intellectual property. My poetry therefore means also that Hitler's demagogy and cynical power program is not necessary - the human mind can uphold its independence in spite of the rapid development of the new technology.

A transformational description means only that 'there is structure there', and this structure can be seen as trivial and 'trans-formation'-al - the 'trans'-formation is not a necessary concept from that point of view, tells the 'nazi' conspiration which could claim that Chomsky is doing nazi propaganda - but what is not trivial is that every computer program is a pushdown automaton but the human spirit (in natural language) is on a phrase structure format, as is Chomsky's claim, and then the 'transformations' concern the spiritual interaction with the computer hardware and then it is not trivial. The difference between e.g. 'Basic' and 'C' programming (I know not much about this, though) can be seen to be the 'organismic architecture' - the modularized object/function-orientation of 'C' - with function calls from here to there and then 'transformation' is not a superfluous concept to the extent that it concerns the immediate interaction of the human mind with the computer. Therefore it is not right to claim that a program of 'transformational grammar' is the same as a 'trans madonna' since otherwise 'transformation' in grammar means strictly speaking only that 'there is structure there'. There is no connection between Chomsky's 'transformation' (including potential modularized 'organismic' functionality) and a hitlerish 'trans madonna' - with an organismic penis trans-planted onto the female - all that confusion is demogagic nonsense only. It could have been the plan to use this demagogic logic for launching the 'dirty beast' in Italy qua 'stor-tempel-G'-od[d], possibly including 'embedded J'. The attempt on the pope could have had just that function.

It is possible that it is this demagogy which is NATO's western program against the east - and that the Ukraine conflict really is about this program. If the 'nazi madonna' seems to have a historic rationale, even if it is only a matter of confusion on concepts like 'trans' and 'organismic', it would be only to the extent that it is difficult to find out how the human spirit can interact immediately with a machine - that is probably so far not solved and that is why such a 'nazi madonna' still has some historic force. It is not solved with electric impulses in the brain giving instructions to a machine - it would be that a change of state in the spirit only leads to a change of state in the electronic circuitry in a computer. My two computer glitsches are examples of that - something very different from such 'surveillance technology' with electric impulses in the brain.

It is possible that 'nazi' or 'secret intelligence' logic claims that no computation beyond the Turing boundary is possible for the simple reason that if you can explain or define anything, then it is also Turing computable. But that is a stance which ignores the fact that such computation is always on a field of knowledge reduced to 2 dimensions (the paper on which you define the formulas and the algorithms for the computation), and it is far from certain that just anything can be reduced to 2 dimensions without loss of important information, and it is a stance which ignores the fact that ex nihilo phenomena do exist - and these occur when they step from another reality into the human reality - which also means that they can change the distribution after the count has started and hence make the sum of probabilities deviate from 1,0. My 'non-euclidean' theorem of logic can handle these phenomena and hence should be able to reach beyond the boundary of what is Turing computable.

The Hitler speech contains the expression 'millions of milking cows' - see also these observations from Iceland: These concern a computability beyond the symbol manipulation in a Turing machine - and Hitler's formula could have been to challenge just that - a challenge which it would have been difficult to counteract since we are still far from being able to compute the relation between the 'hesat'-cow in Iceland and the comparable one in ancient Egypt.

If Iceland is a sort of 'Israel' split off from the 'norwegian Egypt', it tells of the western mythology which could have been tentatively constructed around Norway - here with Gro Harlem Brundtland and Jens Stoltenberg. It is possible that this mythology functions politically only to the extent that Hitler does - that is, untill Hitler's challenges of this type have been refuted or countered with theoretically valid concepts.

Ukraine could not pay for the russian properties after the independence of 1991 and seems to have started harassing the russians in Donbass for solving this problem - that can be called 'partial misrepresentation' - partial because it was only a part of the russian nationality (a problem of partiality solved by russian re-annexation for re-uniting the nationality) and misrepresentation because it dumped the blame on wrong parts of the people - and likewise it is likely that Norway could have had similar interests in supporting Hamas in their post-Oslo -accord period and possibly even in the attack on Israel on 7 october 2023.

To wait for the world to see Norway succumb to their burden of conscience and confess and repair is perhaps not a likely program - any more than Ukraine could solve their problem by choosing a 'nazi madonna' solution. If the world helps me with becoming independent of Norway, the problems like the Hamas attack on Israel in 2023 could perhaps be avoided.

Hornaas Musikk is in Storgata in Oslo - that could be about the Stor-tempel-gasse as the norwegian parametre in the story. This was institutionalized in the logic of Hamas that it was the problems with the mosque = 'Tempel-Gasse/God' in Jerusalem that prompted the attack in october 2023. (Oslo is an 'odd name', isnt it - if it is supposed to mean 'si-rompa' - say, if they had to accept conditions in 1925 of accepting Hitler after WWII? I am only speculating - I dont know if they had to accept Hitler and if this were the reason for the change of name to 'Oslo' - but this speculation could perhaps have some explanatory force). Tempel-Gos[t]lo etc - the assumed onanism on my cortex in my earliest days. These are purely phonological 'interests', though - of temporal-lobe kind.

Hornaas Musikk is in Storgata 43 between (r)Ebbellsgate and Osterhaugsgate. The nearest parallel to Storgata on the other side of the block of houses is Calmeyersgate. These names conform well with the first poem in each of the three parts of my "A deep ratch" = TEQ book 10 - the 'jewish' book:

1. Piratus = TEQ #606 = Osterhaugsgate (by the nails etc)
2. Gay = TEQ #622 = (r)Ebbellsgate
3. Please = TEQ #657 = Calmeyersgate

Which leaves a (missing) fourth part open for Storgata 43 with Hornaas Musikk = Hamas in Palestine - here for Stor-Tempel-Gata = the 'Stoltenberg' factor on Italy.

It is not the temples that are used when hearing music, but the temporal lobes are. And the temples are not far away. Where could that be? Ah, Youngstorget of course - just some metres down Calmeyersgate - there norwegian Labour Party have their headquarter.

This means that if one assumes a 'tetragrammaton' related to the streets in Oslo, when the jewish orthodoxy (as far as I know) tends to avoid pronouncing the YHWH, the Hamas in Palestine could come to appear as unnormally impressive to the israelis by filling in the fourth slot - the 'head' of the 'quartet' - but clearly this would be only in terms of the Oslo streetname phenomenon (near the Oslo Labour headquarter) - assuming a 'universal substrate' quality of my TEQ - and it could assumedly have primarily the function of reinforcing a Labour strategy attempting to coup Italy via that Stor-Tempel-God[d]/Gasse - cp. also an 'Odessa' factor. The assassination of Yitzhak Rabin in 1995 (it was Creul at Hornaas who used to tax string instruments in Oslo) followed after the Oslo accords.

After my MA degree in the spring 1992, in the autumn 1992 I had reasons to believe that I would be accepted for a doctorate program support - not only by temporary work in the lexicographical department in the first half of the autumn but also by the research stipend at the 'Centre for culture and technology' in the second half - but after this fine serve my application was rejected at christmas and I was going into two years of unemployment 1993-95 (with unemployment benefit support only on the condition that I spent the time with applying for relevant work) untill I got the research fellow stipend in Bergen 1995-98, which ended with rejection of my PhD and thereafter likewise threw me into another two years of unemployment (with another round of applications that were rejected all of them - towards the end of that period many of them were not even answered). Would this mean that I in relation to Norway would have been in the role of russian 'creditors' relative to Ukraine? Would that have been a part of the current Israel-Palestine crisis?

This account could have some value also for understanding how one could avoid a 'dirty beast' problem in Italy. There could be a goodness-driven solution even here?

Added on 25 march 2024:

The question sort of articulates itself: Did this Oslo background create Hamas?

Probably not, it would seem, but the Oslo Accords of 1993 could have been established on a related background. Hamas was, tells the internet, established by palestinian interests in late 1987 after the beginning of the 'first intifada' in december 1987. When Ragin Wenck-Wolf (with her Stradivarius which could have been evaluated by Creul at Hornaas Musikk) started to feel the resistance to her career, I dont know.

The story seems to be the apparent 'serve' of the autumn 1992 when I had in fact three academic tasks promising for an academic career: 1) I was teaching linguistics and phonetics for the introductory course at the university, an evening course in Moss (probably one or two evenings per week), 2) work in the first half of the autumn in the lexicographical department in Oslo, preparatory work for a new dictionary, I think it was, probably financed by the university, and 3) a research stipend from november 1992 to january 1993 at the Centre for culture and technology (TMV), financed by the norwegian research council.

See my CV included in probably a stipend application in the second half of the 1990's.

This autumn 1992 after my MA degree in the spring 1992 therefore sounded like a trumpet announcing an academic career from january 1993, and I had good reasons to expect that my application to the research council would be accepted. In late 1992 I was informed by Even Hovdhaugen (professor at the institute, advisor for my MA studies) that my application to the research council could not be accepted because I had not also applied for a stipend at the faculty of humanistic studies. This strange reasoning could have meant that I could not get a research stipend because they believed that I wanted to be independent of the faculty obligations because of the 'octogon' - then far from anything 'public' but possibly common knowledge - which sounds like a trumpet sounding from 'Hornaas Musikk'. From january to august 1993 I had no other chances than to continue my work from the 1980's as part- and/or score-writer, now for an opera (by Antonio Bibalo) for the Norwegian Opera in Storgata 23. Hornaas Musikk is in Storgata 43. This work could in norwegian be called 'noteskriver' - cp. the NOT 'e' WRITER = 'c' WRITER - the later apparent political intrigue on e/c (cp. Wien/Viken etc). See also 24 august 2022: The death of Darya Dugina.

To what extent the 'Viken' term for the former county names Østfold, Buskerud, Akershus would have been for or against this apparently 'Wien'-related intrigue on basis of e/c, I dont know, but if it were known already then that it would come up and e.g. be related to smell, it is possible that 'Viken' could have been sufficient for counterbalancing it rather than for making it - I cannot really evaluate this if Viken were for or against this potential 'smell' program - but notice that it seems that the Labour party was opposed to this 'Viken' project.

The rejection of my application probably reached me around 23 december 1992, as it did in some years thereafter - it could perhaps have been intended that I would have opened the envelope with much optimism after that eminent 'serve' and expected to find the positive message - but would have been christmas-surprised by the rejection (like the '1223' could have been intended to make me appreciate or at least adapt to administrative 'chemicals' in a similar way by residing in Austria) - but Even Hovdhaugen had told me this in advance. I think Wallace Chafe, professor at Santa Barbara since 1991, stood next to him and heard the words - Chafe had just given a lecture which I had attended. This was after I had to bite the dust with the crisis in 1988-89 when I was sharing office with Dag Diesen - not Bag Bissen (= 'Tongue Hele-ne Røver'?). Chafe had edited a periodical along with Johanna Nichols who wrote an article (along with Peterson) in Language june 1996 ("The Amerind Personal Pronouns") which I suspected could have been related to two chapters in my 'Submorphemic signification' self-published in 1995 - chapters 4 and 5 - even if of course she could have been into similar things in her work. I think I read somewhere that Nichols went into the board of the 'Linguistic Society of America' (who publishes Language) after this article - like Jens-Erik Fenstad went into a board of UNESCO after he had rejected my PhD in 1998.

Christmas = jul (norwegian).

The question is therefore whether I had been given motivation (by stipends and support) for this preplanned rejection throughout the years 1987-1992 when I studied linguistics and worked for the MUSIKUS program at the institutes of informatics and music. I had earned money as partwriter ('noteskriver') throughout the 1980's and after a semester course in greek in the spring 1987 I started studying linguistics in the autumn 1987, exam for the first level in the spring 1988, thereafter I worked more concentratedly for the MUSIKUS project in the year from the summer 1988 to the summer 1989 and took the second level ('mellomfag') exam in linguistics in the autumn 1989. I had got a student stipend 1990-92 for the MA degree, which included a stay in Budapest in 1991 - this would have been considered as a quite strong motivation for continueing and would have lent fuel to my optimisms thereby, and adding the promising autumn 1992 (with linguistics teaching in Moss, lexicographical work and research stipend from november to january) there were very good reasons to believe that my application (sent I think in the late spring or early summer 1992) to the research council would be accepted.

I had not applied for a 'FAKULTET stipend', though, was the reason for the rejection, told Hovdhaugen. It was normal that those who went for an academic career would apply to both research council and university for such stipends. I think the faculty stipend included more heavy obligations for teaching during the study - and although I had been teaching for the obligatory course (preparatory in linguistics for students of languages) in the autumn, it was not something that I wanted to do on background of my general relations to the norwegian society, not the least what I now suspect was a story of heavy child abuse (I suspect it to include an opening of the head in 1957 - this MRT scan shows that the skull is intact but a part of the brain has been scissored off, which means that it would have been done in the earliest days of my life - and chemical horrors in Hammerfest in 1959 apparently installed by '1223' into the Labour party - probably, as I now guess, such heavy child abuse organized by and for making power for the norwegian administration - see also this evidence). It cost me too much of my forces to stand before a norwegian audience teaching linguistics - and I therefore hoped to avoid this as part of the stipend period. My academic career would have to be in research centres and not before students at universities, would have been the best solution. But although such a background in potential child abuse would have been the main reason for my problems with teaching obligations, it was probably taken that it was the 'octogon' which was the main reason for that - and therefore a rejection of my research council application because I had not applied also for a faculty stipend could have been telling or indicative of the idea that is was the 'octogon' which was the reason for the rejection - and this reason could perhaps be called 'Hornaas Musikk'.

When the rejection at christmas time 1992 was followed by the Oslo Accords negotiations in 1993, it is noteworthy that the four norwegian participants in the Oslo accord negotiations in 1993 were Terje Rød-Larsen, Mona Juul, Jan Egeland and Johan Jørgen Holst, which in the surnames sounds like a 'fac-juul-tete stipend'.

'Moen' is folk norwegian for 'military service'. 'Terje-Mona-Jan-Johan-Jørgen' = 'terror-moen-gave-him-jo-hand-jerken' could have been the phonological background of the event when Johan Jørgen Holst allegedly was shot by an intruder in late 1993 (by a 'Chafe weapon'? cp. the D/B after Chernobyl and the name of the current british Labour chief - I think I recall the news told that Holst had grabbed for his 'gold(en) pistol' but was not quick enough - see also the Dynasty 1981 and the linoleum) and died from the wounds to the head on 12 or 13 january 1994 when the 'cable' was 'pulled' from Rwanda asking UN to stop the planned genocide - which UN by its then chief of the peace preserving forces Kofi Annan did not (search the ABC for '800.000 Tutsies' - Annan was later elected chief of UN). This death of Holst could have signified the application I wrote to the research council - which was rejected - if the 'surnames' meant the application I did not write to the faculty. (There is also a taint of 'Johan Jørgen Holst' in the names of the two leaders of the MUSIKUS program - Ole Johan Dahl and Arvid Vollsnes).

When Johan Jørgen Holst was shot in late 1993 and Yitzhak Rabin (who had been in the negotiations for the Oslo Accords) in late 1995, it could have been a counterpoint to my 16th birthday on 29 june 1973 when I did not get the identity of the new father since 1969 - but the israeli ambassador to Maryland was shot 'instead' and the day after the palestinian intelligence chief was shot. The Yom Kippur war broke out some weeks later (on 6 october 1973) and seemed to signify or suggest that the new father - who also called himself 'John Grøver', like the first one - could have been Adolf Hitler. When Hamas attacked Israel on 7 october 2023, that was 50 years and 1 day after this outbreak of the Yom Kippur war in 1973.

The winter olympics was at Lillehammer in Norway 12-27 (not 12-23) february 1994. Were there abuse of surveillance data of me in the Lillehammer winter olympics transmission to all countries in the world? Where does this strange idea come from? I have never head any such rumour but Radio Free Service (who talks news inside your mind) may perhaps have mentioned something like that.

I had moved from Bregneveien to Kampen (not far from the house I lived in in 1957-58, my earliest childhood memory) in the autumn 1992 and was in a miserable condition in the autumn 1994 when I got the chance to move back to Bregneveien where my condition improved again and eventually I moved over to Nilserudkleiva where I wrote my diary novel "The dreamer" 1994-95.

I was then eventually rescued by a faculty stipend at the university of Bergen from august 1995 to july 1998. (It was initially scheduled to be for four years including 1 year of teaching but I had applied early for being freed from these obligations which was accepted but then the stipend was reduced from 4 to 3 years). When the second 'serve' was launched in 1998 after I had handed in the PhD dissertation for evaluation on 2 december 1997, the bombing of the US embassies in Dar-es-Salaam and Nairobi plus the peace conference in Omagh seemed to tell "rejected on a political basis" which could have been the contents of the appeal I was writing just then. Gro Harlem Brundtland started her term as chief of WHO around that time or some time later.

If the 'octogon' were considered to be the real reason for this story of me as the 'other side' of the Oslo Accords 1993, it can be seen to be an essential question whether this octogon could have been organized by public administration. I have found some reasons to speculate that Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin - see the addition of 24/3-24 to 23 march 2024 - could have been names involved, could be Saul Bellow and others as well - although of course it could have been possible that these could have been only using data on such an 'octogon' - but then of course if it were planned in advance it must have been planned in advance and then it must have been an organized intrigue. If so, it could be rather essential that this be downgraded to public, not the least on background of such things as this Hamas attack on Israel of 7 october 2023 on background of the Oslo Accords 1993.

Why do I have to spend so much time on writing these things which journalists and administration should have written and published? Probably because the world is still badness-driven in its economy.

Added on 26 march 2024:

Nichols & Peterson in their article in Language june 1996 credit Matthew Dryer for comments (see bottom of the first page). In 2002 I was perhaps hit by a laser beam on my cortex in the area of the left hand (the MRT scan shows a lesion there as from a cerebral haemorrhage) - it curled up and was rather useless for a long time but could after some months and years be used almost as normal again. This happened on 23 february 2002 - my younger sister Tone Helene Grøver's birthday and the day of the news of the abduction of Ingrid Betancourt - I had just read these news and closed the computer when it happened - before I left Vilnius in april 2002 - when I decided to go for applying for a political asylum in France rather than going back to Norway.

I have speculated if the TV series 'The Dynasty' (2017) produced by ABC could have been a plagiarism of my book "Der Dornenstrauch" (2009-2015) - self-published in 2015 - I have not seen any of the TV episodes, though, but based my speculation on the intro video which is available on the internet. 'The Dynasty' 2017 (and the 1981 series as well) was written by Richard and Esther Shapiro. The name 'Shapiro' occurs as signature to TEQ #225 - where one also can spot the two lines 'Anti quariat / Alta film'. There are 1719 poems in TEQ which means that this signature comes on the ratio 225/1719 which multiplied with the 440 poems of 'Der Dornenstrauch' gives 57,5916 = 0,5916 through poem #58 which in relative enumeration is DDS #46 which has 12 lines and hence the name would end on 0,5916 * 12 = 7,1 - which means on the beginning of line 8 - here are lines 5-8:

Ein leises Wachen in dem frühen
Morgenluft sich unterwarf
des Wachens Warten auf das Blühen
und des Schlummerndes Bedarf.

This suggests that 'Shapiro' corresponds to '(des Wachens Warten auf) das Blühen / und' - that is the intro photo for the intro video to the 2017 edition - the woman who turns and looks as if on a surveillance photo = 'des Wachens Warten' with a lampshade behind and some flowers in front which could be meaning the 'Blühen'. It is seen that the whole intro photo could be an interpretation of this DDS #46. The intro video is mentioned somewhat also in this file.

Could this relate to the story of the 'fakultet-stipend' by the Oslo Accords 1993? In 'The Dreamer' page 157 I tell of the vision relating to an event in 1993 - the vision of a motorbike the size of a bus coming in from outer space and steering just clear of the top of the 12-storey faculty building before it crashes into the nearby road. This vision can be seen to be constituted by the principles of 'Der Dornenstrauch' - the faraway and eerie (?) 'cosmic' form of part I, then coming into the gravity field of the earth in parts II and III before it crashes into 'Die Schönheit der Welt' in part IV. It is also possible to see it as related to 'The Dreamer' itself - the story told by what could be 'an envoy from heaven' who has come to write a report (the diary novel itself) on the state of the earth before he returns to heaven on the last page. What links this to the story from 1993 would be the year 1993 itself and the 'fakultet' building. Evidence of this could be seen in the tragic bus crash in Venice in 2023. The accident happened at 19:38, tells the article - that is the time point which I had predicted for the next silent telephone (at the end of the telephone terror 1986-88) if it were Ragna Grøver who called - and the phone came precisely as predicted. The bus in the 2023 accident was of type Yutong-E10 which is described as a 'battery electric single-decker' bus - the accident happened just where Via della Pila (= 'Battery Street') and Via Elettricità (underneath) and Via della Libertà (above) meet. (How could such 'coincidences' by engineered? Had there been an electronic scrambler 'behind the bus' = 'Bag Bussen' - for 'dieting the bus[t]'? I should add that in the MUSIKUS project 1987-89, the participating Tor-Sverre Lande was called 'Bassen' for reasons I did not understand then but now perhaps can see as related to the name of Diesen). It could have been for invoking TEQ #225 for the context of Venice on background of the 1993 Oslo Accords - even as instantiated by 'The Dynasty' TV series broadcasted in a great number of the world's countries - that is, if this TV series sent from 2017 onwards relates to or even should be an outright plagiarism of my 'Der Dornenstrauch' (2009-2015). Clearly if that should be the case - that it is a plagiarism of my book - the relevant authorities must take action to have it stopped etc. I have not given any permissions to such use. If it were about a plagiarism, it is not impossible that it could have contributed to my deteriorating health since about 2016, critically in 2018-2019.

Norway was founded in 1814 as an explicitly antisemitic state - jews had no access to the new kingdom. This lasted untill 1851. The idea of an ancient glorious 'viking-time' kingdom in Norway (as a reason for the re-opening of the state in 1814) is rooted not the least in the document called 'Heimskringla' which seems to have existed in only one copy (which lacked the front page - it was later consumed by fire after Jon Eggertson had made a copy of it, and only one page survived the fire), and this idea of a medieval 'superpower' controlling the oceans could have been essential for the re-opening of the state in 1814. However, it is possible that to the extent that this idea is based on the assumed authenticity of 'Heimskringla' and comparable documents, there could be reasons to speculate if the stories in this document could be recognized as constructed on basis of semantically opposed word pairs in norwegian and hebrew - see the mention of hebrew-norwegian word pairs in these considerations. Hence if these considerations should apply to the rationale for a re-opening of the state of Norway in 1814, it could be seen as being in opposition to the hebrew interests which could have been invoked for the re-opening of the state of Israel in 1948. Clearly since these considerations should apply to the diachronic roots of the languages, a theoretic abuse of my 'Der Dornenstrauch' could come in as maximally unfortunate to the extent that this work applies to the diachronic roots of language - exemplified by the diachronic roots of hebrew and sanskrit-vedic (the tables on the pages 944-950). I do not know to what extent the stories in 'Heimskringla' could have been outright engineered on basis of these semantically opposed hebrew-norwegian word pairs, but clearly if that should have been the case, in particular if the opposed word-pairs should have applied to bad bodily smells and similar phenomena, the historic basis for the establishment of the state of Norway in 1814 including its antisemitic constitution (which could have been felt as 'necessary' in order to avoid e.g. bad smells and similar phenomena) could have been maximally opposed to the historic basis for the state of Israel in 1948. (For example, it is usual to say that Harald Harfager = Harald Fairhair was the first to collect the nation to one kingdom - he was so called because he wanted Gyda who, though, would not marry him before he had collected the whole of Norway, and therefore he would not cut his hair before the kingdom was collected - hebrew גדע means 'to cut or break asunder' and hence there could attach ideas to his long hair that it would be as unwashed as it was long and hence eventually had to be chiselled off). The first norwegian king in modern times was Haakon VII (1905) - called the 'seventh' Haakon because of six Haakon kings from those medieval times - the last of these was Haakon VI who lived 1340-1380. Clearly if the eventual conclusion could be that the attack of Hamas on Israel in october 2023 had its origins in a mocking document which could have been used as historic basis for the opening of Norway in 1814, it is high time with a thorough criticism of the authenticity of these allegedly medieval historic documents.

28 march 2025:

An email of tuesday 21 december 2010 (11:08 AM) from the norwegian tax authorities ('Skatt Nord') told: "Viser til din epost 24.11.2010 hvor du søker om fritak for kildeskatt. // Etter skatteavtalen mellom Norge og Østerrike er du skattepliktig til Norge for pensjon som utbetales fra Norge". By https://translate.google.at: "Refers to your e-mail of 24/11/2010 where you apply for exemption from withholding tax. // According to the tax agreement between Norway and Austria, you are liable to tax in Norway for pensions paid from Norway".

Today I received the automatically filled-in tax return from Norway for which one must alter wrong or incomplete information, otherwise one need not respond. I am liable to tax to Norway for only the pension/benefit and the tax return included the information about my bank account in Norway (and what was on the account) to which the pension/benefit is paid, but none of my accounts abroad are mentionerd. Should I have to tell them? I have searched in the relevant website of the norwegian tax authorities and found this: "Dersom du har annen inntekt og formue som er skattepliktig i Norge, men som ikke er forhåndsutfylt i skattemeldingen, må du selv føre opp inntekten/formuen" = "If you have other income and assets that are liable to tax in Norway, but which are not pre-filled in the tax return, you must declare your own income/assets".

This sounds clear and obvious - since the money on my bank accounts abroad are not taxable in Norway, I do not have to declare them, it could mean. But bank accounts are not the same as assets and there seems to be a little hole in the facts presented on the website and in the tax return about just this: There should have been an explicit formulation telling that "if you are a resident abroad and are liable to withholding tax to Norway for pension/benefit only, then you do not have to add information about other bank accounts that you could have". I cannot have this little piece of information explicitly stated or confirmed anywhere.

Could it be called 'fakt-hullet' = 'the fact-hole'? Movement of the 'T gives 'fak-hull-tet'? 'Stipend' is a word derived from latin 'stipendium' = soldiers' pay by which they could afford to buy salt to add to their food. Maybe some would say that Hamas 'peppered' Israel with missiles on 7 october 2023?

R/N on 'Norway' = 'Norge' gives 'Ronge' which could suggest 'ronke' = 'to masturbate'. 'Masser-ba-te' 'masses-prayed-to' could suggest 'stor-tempel'.

I dont know what could happen if the tax return has been incomplete in this sense of it through many years. I have not written to them to tell about my bank accounts in other countries and I would doubt that they have the right to know about them. I am obliged to report my income beyond a certain limit to NAV since it could reduce the pension/benefit payment, but I have had no other income and none of my bank accounts have produced more than 2-3 euros or so per year and these euros are by far consumed by the fees.

These considerations are probably quite uninteresting but such a fact-hole could perhaps have some impact on me on background of the assumed opening of my head in the early days of me life - for example if there were masturbation on my 'cortex' = 'hjerne-barken' - cp. the 'bark accords'. Honour Os-lo? (Not about 'flat-jul-ends stipend', I suppose?) If the story is that little 'fact-hole', the real issue could be the 'tick the box' issue on membership in the norwegian social insurance scheme 'Folketrygden': I have paid all the social fees for this throughout my life (except perhaps for a year or two around 2000-2002) but since 2000 I have not been a member - the story is that with 100% disability pension it is not necessary to be a member, they say, but that is a matter of interpretation of the formulation of the law - and it is possible that this is not really completely covered in the law, like the present case of duty to inform about missing data on bank accounts. In fact the information on this page tells "Finn ut om du fremdeles er medlem av Folketrygden og skal betale trygdeavgift til Norge. Medlemskap i folketrygden er nøkkelen til rettigheter fra NAV" = "Find out if you are still a member of Folketrygden and must pay social security contributions to Norway. Membership in the National Insurance is the key to rights from NAV". The real question of 'fakt-hullet' could therefore in principle be whether I really am entitled to retire pension. I have got the letter from a computer which tells "Uføretrygden din opphører og regnes om til 100 prosent alderspensjon måneden etter at du fyller 67 år. Du trenger ikke søke om dette" = "Your disability benefit ends and is converted to 100 per cent retire/old-age pension the month after you turn 67. You do not need to apply for this" - which is to say that the current benefit ends and that the new pension is computed according to normal rules. I should according to normal rules have got the letter in march but got it in february instead, 31 days earlier, and the Storting = the norwegian parliament had decided on a reduction of the social fees for 2024 to be 7,8% against the previous year 7,9% which reduced my payments of this with 31 kroner. Variations in these fees are normal, but the 31 days and 31 kroner would be a coincidence. However, it could also mean that I could be considered 'the dirty beast of the revelation', like scissoring off a little part of the brain on the one side of 'hjerne-barken' = 'cortex' and adding a little on the other cortical half by masturbating on it, as could have happened in 1957. That would be a very unnormal and a hole in the 'facts' - but the story from the Oslo Accords of 1993 (and the attack on Israel on 7 october 2023, one day after the 50th anniversary of the start of the 1973 Yom Kipper war which could have concerned or at least be relevant to my rights to get the information about the new father's identity) could perhaps have invoked such ideas. The question is therefore whether I get the retire pension automatically or if it simply does not come - or if the letter and payment are stolen in the post and by computer problems etc. Will the telephone and other communications to Norway function in july? Will there be 1223 'intelligence coups' in some countries? This could be the real issue of this 'fakt-hullet' - this concept of 'dirty beast in the revelation'. Maybe one could have hoped for getting the decision of july 2024 a little earlier than normal, like that letter of 5 february 2024 which was not signed but sent from and by a computer, but had an 'NAVs saksnummer' nevertheless?

Source:

Onions, C.T.: The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford 1982.