Wherefrom comes the idea that Kennedy masturbated on my brain in 1957?

Wherefrom comes the idea that Kennedy masturbated on my brain in 1957?

John Bjarne Grover

What are my reasons for the idea that John F.Kennedy could have masturbated on my cortex in july 1957?

I dont know when modern medicine started mastering the art of rebuilding people to new looks, for the wolf in grandmother's bed, but in the modern world it seems that virtually anybody can hide behind the surface of anybody. If now even irises can be replaced, there is not much left of biometrics for normal people. It means that for the official world, there are two levels of reality: One is the mythological world that guides opinion, the other is the world of biometric facts behind the facade. It is possible that this latter is the only real level of knowledge for administration, but for the vast opinion there is only the mythological world which has any real existence.

Therefore when discussing whether a person could be another one - say, if the theme should be if Volodymyr Zelensky could be a rebuilt Heinrich Himmler or not - it is of course completely futile to believe that one can reach any level of knowledge beyond the foggy mythos, that instrument which Hollywood plays on for guiding thought and behaviour, reality, political opinion etc.

My own example is good: In 1969 my official father was replaced with a copy. He never gave any clear signs in advance that this would come to happen and therefore it could have been a crime. The only cue I got was the famous last word he said when he stepped out of the car - "I have to piss" he said (it was the first time he used that sort of language) and went behind a shed. We were waiting for the ferry at Vikebukt ferry station, which we often used in the summer. When he returned some minutes later, he was another person - it is not possible that he had only pushed in some silicon in the cheeks or something like that - it was another person who took his place behind the wheel - but the mother pretended that she did not notice the difference, which of course was alarming. The moral was not that such language isn't smart - it was that security did not exist in the family.

There had been an occasion some time before - he and I were walking back from the kiosk at the harbour and a man in strange 'hobo tuxedo' called his name from behind - he asked me to wait and he and the man went behind a shed and stayed a little too long - I got nervous but eventually he returned and explained that it was an old schoolmate who had wanted to clear out some old problems. The strange tuxedo is explained with Albert Engström's cartoons (texted drawings) - these always seem to have the standard undertext "två dubbla sakramentor - men genast" - "two double sacraments - but quickly" - the hobo in tuxedo (the character is called 'kolingen') who goes to altar in the sunday morning for a drink. Albert Engström himself (born 12 may) lived in Fjällgatan 12 on Söder in Stockholm in Sweden - while my grandparents lived in Fjellgata 72 in Ålesund in Norway - this address and family seems to be the theme of the 1954 US film "There's no business like show business". My life is crammed with this sort of 'coincidences' - and it seems (as I have guessed) that I am the real crux of the story - the end of a Stammbaum construction since post-1789 royal interests which imitates a Messiah function (generations in the tree imitating verses from the Bible in such a way that it looks like a bridge from the old to the new testament - for a Jesus 'fulfilling the scriptures', as I have guessed) in such a way that the 'Messiah' role could be hijacked from me and lifted over onto royal interests - in the modern world where anybody in principle can be replaced with a copy that means International Secret Intelligence Service interests - and thereby the 'royal' interests hoped to dress up in divine feathers which a mere republican president could never contest. This should make the royals invulnerable to the people of a 1789 revolution, since the people could not revolt against the divine. In reality the intelligence project on me seems to be the attempt to construct a modern quasi-religion based on massive amounts of intelligence data on my person which the people do not have and thereby the people can be controlled via such a dirty 'religion'. Of course I am an ardent opponent against this. If John F.Kennedy masturbated on my opened cortex in july 1957, that would have been for precisely this lifting of the newborn 'Messiah' over onto political interests.

I personally believe that Nelly Sachs and Paul Celan are my biological parents. (Why I not resemble them? I have guessed, but know little about this and guess also that nobody will tell me, that skullcap lifting creates cheekbones, that childhood rape makes undeveloped chin, that chemical horror creates smaller back of the head plus deeper eye cavities and that 'pulver' can stop the development of the muscles - therefore I could have resembled other people). My first childhood memory was from the time before I could walk - I was on all four in a corridor and looked into the floor, then lifted the head to see the wall and from there further up to see the lamp in the ceiling (where I think a few flies inside the lampshade straddle the end of the memory). In 1993 I worked with child language acquisition and went to check the address of this memory - it was in Brinken 2 in Oslo (we lived there from late september 1957 to probably april 1958 and I had never been back there later in life) and I went to the place and found it exactly as I remembered it, only a firehose had come up on the wall in the mean time. It was when I read the correspondence between Sachs and Celan that this got its explanation: The memory is also precisely the contents of the first poem she sent to him in a letter of 10 march 1958 - so the memory is probably from the moment when he picked up this letter and read it probably a day or two later. Hence the story is not only about royal interests - it is also a matter of the fate of the jews. Under the theory that anybody can hide behind the facade of anybody, like the wolf and the granny, there arises the ghost that my official mother (at least up to 1981) could have been a rebuilt Heinrich Himmler who constructed the holocaust. I always believed that it was a normal woman, though - and the idea appears immediately hilarious - but it is a matter of mythology and I cannot have any opinion on facts behind the facade.

There is evidence in favour of this Hitler-Himmler mythos theory - in this file. If so, even the holocaust could have been constructed as a preparation for my 'divine' person - for making the divine feathers of the new upper class of global intelligence service power impressive and goodlooking.

The official father appeared to have been replaced with a copy - and the new one never told his identity but sometimes laughed at this "två dubbla sakramentor", by which he could have meant other members of the family than himself? - and by the law I probably had the right to get his identity on my 16th birthday 29 june 1973: I did not get it but the israeli ambassador to Maryland was assassinated and the palestinian intelligence chief likewise the next day, and some weeks later the Yom Kippur war broke out.

'Kippur' in norwegian sounds like 'slippers' and hence 'Yom Kippur' sounds like both "idle feetler" and "John Grøver" - and the role of the war could have been to tell that "John Grøver" = "Adolf Hitler" (behind the facade).

However, there is a possible background for this in the name of John Fitzgerald Kennedy: See this file for the double function of the name of Kennedy: 'Feet-scroll' qua 'slippers' would refer to this 'idle feetler' while 'feet-scare-all' would refer to Himmler's 'Gestapo' manners of slamming heels together when taking order - that would be the name of my younger sister 'Tone Helene Grøver' born on 23 february 1961 - 20 months before JFK's october 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, a veritable 'scare-all'. Would 20 months be the 'feet'? That is another mythos element that comes up from all this complex clusters - that JFK did not die in the assassination but followed the life of my younger sister on surveillance and took her place in 1978 at the time of the Aldo Moro murder in Italy (in the night when an old woman called 'Apenes' who lived a hundred metres from me was knife-murdered - she was the old mother of a conservative MP). But clearly this looks not like the normal 'glossy image' of the US president - and of course I cannot present this as anything but a mythological complex which to some extent governs opinion in the public via mass media etc. To the extent that a former US president could be a wolf behind the granny facade I cannot have any opinion on. I believed it was my sister whom I met now and then in the period from 1978 up to the first half of the nineties. The last time I met her she still had that same old habit of hers of scratching her head (called 'hodebunnen' = 'the bottom of the head' in norwegian) - I notice also the story of Wittgenstein who had pulled = 'lugga' a student girl in the hair. If there should have been a reason for alarm, it would have been that single time in 1978 or 1979 when she showed me her new flat in the Old Town in Fredrikstad, where I lived some streets away - she could have been a little different of style and maybe I could have observed some professionalism which I had not seen before but it clearly was her and these small elements could have had natural reasons. In the 1960's I got from the official father the book by Krarup Nielsen which seems to describe (at least in the photos) some of the big things in my life in advance - if JFK should have taken the place of my younger sister it would have been told in the images between pages 112-113: Photo 112a tells of the sculpture between hers and my flat in the Old Town, while photo 112c shows a photo of a 'Mads Lange' who necessarily reminds me much of 'Morten Sørlie' (from this source) whom I met first via Fjellheim in 1977 or 1978 - it would have been the young person that resembles this image 12c. 'Sørlie' associates with 'Sølvie' = 'silvery' and hence the name could tell of the Kennedy assassination in 1963 if that were designed as a 'revenge' for a masturbation on my cortex in 1957. But it would be only me in this world who would get this info from this photo in that book.

I recall the persistent strikes at 'Sulitjelma Gruber/Gruver' in the 1960's - these strikes among the miners (!) was frequent news which I noticed even if news otherwise were not interesting. The name strongly suggests 'spills/splashes in the helmet of Grøver' and it is likely that it could have been about the opening of my head in july 1957. If, as the mythos fog could suggest, JFK were then rehearsing the role by studying surveillance data of my younger sister, the strikes could have told that it is better to let it be.

(There also seems to exist the idea that it was my younger sister who assassinated Indira Gandhi - this idea likewise sounds absurd to me but of course if the idea tries to tell that US president Kennedy were involved, that sounds more probable somehow).

One of the aspects of this mythos complex is the idea that it could have been the plan (of those who organized this intrigue) that I would come to write some interesting literature and JFK having taken the place of my younger sister could later claim that I had stolen it from her and that she had written it. A third world war - for setting International Secret Intelligence Service power though all over the world - could have been planned for the pretext function of winning this challenge as a pretext for the war - and is it that much worth with Grover's name on the front page, could have been the logic - and that could have been the 'Cuban Missile Crisis' - the threat of a nuclear world war on the background of the opening ('kuben' = 'crowbar') of the head for a 'clissis' spurt of fluids.

Why dont the politicians tell all this - while the data are still available and truth is not completely consumed in a third world war?

I have come to the assumption that these historic data are recorded or archived in 'undertext' format in periodicals such as Modern Language Review and the cartoons of the New Yorker magazine. If this should be the case, then the Modern Language Review for july 1957 should expectedly contain cues to this assumed head opening. It seems to do: The first title is "A Current Misconception concerning the Influence of Marino's Poetry on Crashaw's" by Laura Pettoello which could be about just this aspect of the hypothetic third world war: The current is the spurt, the misconception is the masturbation, the strategy is to claim that the poetry of Crashaw (which would be me) is influenced by the poetry of Marino ('and crashaws marinos poetry' = 'John Grover means John F.Kendy'? - it is probably the same Marino (from this source) as Caravaggio has made a portrait of) and that this is the essential concern. The name of the author would have been 'Pettoello' in rewrite 'Luitpold' (probably from the 'zidalweidun' problems by the Schenkungs-Urkunde as quasi and admittedly ridiculous 'reason' for Austrian territorial rights - "in der Mark und Grafschaft des Grafen Heinrich, des Sohnes des Markgrafen Liutpald, in dem Ort, der Niuvanhova genannt wird" - the mid name of Heinrich Luitpold Himmler who then expectedly would have been an agent for the International Secret Intelligence Services - while the first and last of his three names would be in 'Henrik Pontoppidan' in the last of the 7 main articles of that MLR issue. 'Laura' of the first could be the role of my PhD dissertation which was unjustly rejected (according to my view) - this could have been planned since my birth. The second title about Wordsworth's critical essays could find an example in what you are reading just now. Robert Heron could then be about 'divine feathers'. Etc.

If it were John Fitzgerald Kennedy who masturbated on my brain in 1957, the name should expectedly have been hidden in this issue format. Is it? It should have been in the mid of the 7 main article titles - that is "Two Obscure Sonnets by Verlaine" by C. Chadwick. Clearly the title could mean just the name of JFK - and should this mean something about the name C. Chadwick - say, 'Kød[d] Eidsvig' or something like that? Cod, God, Köder etc? It would have meant high treason by the gender organ - with coreference to the socalled 'octogon' on my person - and hence it could mean the Kennedy assassination which clearly looked as if it were organized by FBI because of such reasons. (The shot in Dallas came from the window of 'Texas School Book Depository' and hence could have encoded the role of Wittgenstein's school book relative to the names of the Kennedys, some of whom were born before Wittgenstein's 1926 book - not a 'proof' that the Kennedys were constructed agents but maybe it could have had some suggestive value for ideas of what a 'high treason' could have been about). Eidsvig was the name of the family in Fjellgata 72 - my official mother is born Ragna Eidsvig - the 'vaudeville' family in the US film "There's no business like show business". 'Vådeskudd' is norwegian for bullet astray - as if it were an accident and not an intentional murder.

There seems to be a strong mythos which tells that Kennedy masturbated on my brain in 1957. That does not prove that he did - but at least I personally have to observe the reality of the mythos, not the least for protecting the integrity of my authorship. The mythos seems to be so strong that it could arise as a 'clot' that clings to your mind as soon as you come across these things - and then 'join feet-scare-all zombie' would be the invitation to join the political movement of the international secret intelligence services - and this would also be the possible reason why there seems to be so extensive abuse and plagiarisms of my work more or less all over the world. That is why conscious deliberation on the nature of this 'zombie clot of reading' could be so important - it could be so important that it even could have been a background of the riots on Capitol Hill in USA after the 2020 US presidential election - taking 'Capitol Hill' to mean 'caput of little' = 'the head of the infant'. Of course it is possible that the mythos was so strong that this in itself was the reason why Kennedy was elected president - but then it could also have been the reason why he was shot.

But if the mythos is that strong, then I should also take care that it does not run off with the authorship and copyright to my work.

There are two forms of power in this story: The people selecting their politicians is the one form of power, the contrary power is the intelligence services selecting the information they present to the politicians. Ideally intelligence services shall not have any power at all but since their work is to select the right information, unfortunate power arises from a bad selection (whereby they get some of the power which the administration should have had - like that infant head story of a couped future) and the worse their selection is the more power they get - as long as they still have the politicians' confidence. It is seen how closely this could approximate mafia business. Therefore intelligence power is the opposite of constitutional power - and the conflation of this with the french 1789 revolution against the then constitutional royal power is apparently an endless source of misconception - as if the intelligence services with their principled disposition for hitlerish intrigues should have been the interests of the people. Of course Hitler is not the friend of the people.

It is in this foggy boggy landscape of conflation of royal and republican powers that Kennedy could have been elected on basis of strong confusional mythos powers.

After the 2020 US election and the riots on Capitol Hill, I used to have the following 'zombie clot' on the top of the front page of this website of mine:

...it seems that John F.Kennedy could have
masturbated a spurt on my newborn brain in
1957 and that this can have determined the US
presidential election as late as in 2020...

I could perhaps have made it even more absurd-looking, by adding e.g. "after Heinrich Himmler had opened my head with a kitchen knife". It must be understood that it is by the 'gross harassment' (= norw. 'grov sjikane') of my young brain - including the 'yackie zombie' elements of sperm-clots, brain matter and things like that - that this strategy can have a political effect for turning the roles in the foggy post-royalist mythos world: If I try to take it up in public for showing where the 'ruling power' could come from, it could look like harassment of Kennedy since I necessarily cannot prove that it was him. I am not interested in the matter itself - but I am interested in protecting my authorship from the 'influences' from such power. And, of course, if a third and possibly nuclear world war can be prevented, everybody would agree to these interests of mine.

A woman lived in a house where the rules required silence at night. Then one night a burglar came and she yelled out the window "help help". Were it right to throw her out because she had violated the rules? It is not that everybody shall do what I do - on the contrary it is high time that they pay for all the plagiarisms and start thinking on their own.

The very sick quasi religion they seem to try to construct seems to be me as a quasi 'Jesus' (of the Stammbaum) who is expected to forgive their sins - in unity with a nazi madonna who could have been Heinrich Himmler and who thereby gets her 'divinity' from mass murder. Stop the nazis!!!! Help help!!!

Added 4 april 2023: The Yom Kippur element seems to apply to both the equation 'John Grøver' = 'Adolf Hitler' and to the name of 'John Fitzgerald Kennedy' relative to 'Heinrich Himmler'. It is noticed that Beatles had a song in the 1960's called 'Day Tripper' which could have been about this 'Yom Kippur' ('yom' means 'day') - in which case it would mean either that the Yom Kippur war was planned in advance or that it really applied primarily to Kennedy. The joint account could be that the strikes among the 'miners' in 'Sulitjelma Gruver' - I cannot remember when it was but it is likely that there was an extended conflict in 1968 or thereabout and that a certain wellhidden nervousness in the house could have given rise to some attention of mine - could have been a strike concerning the planned replacement of the first father with a new one in probably the summer 1969. (Could be the strikes applied to the negotiations on wages in the spring 1969?) However, if these strikes concerned a replacement of John Grøver with Adolf Hitler by way of the concept of Yom Kippur, it would likely have been about Kennedy - in which case 'Sulitjelma Gruver' would have applied to Kennedy, which would have been a rather strong indication that he was involved in a masturbation on the brain of the 'miner' Grøver. When I now search the web for these strikes, I cannot find them but my memory about this name in strike in the 1960's (from at least 1967 or later since we then lived in Bjørnstjerne Bjørnsons Vei) is quite certain. If they are taken off the web it could have been because of this evidential value?