The theme of old swindle in historic documents

The theme of old swindle in historic documents

John Bjarne Grover

It seems that old swindle on historic documents can have been a most significant factor in history. A theory seems to exist that this is a story of british swindle on documents assigned fundamental importance in other european cultures and countries - teasers which have brought these countries down in the impossibility to prove their [un]authenticity. It is the absolute need for knowing this which has created strange cultural side effects. I have made a list of possible swindle documents (but know little about how these are evaluated by others):

Decameron - led to the formation of the italian mafia ('the camorra')
Heimskringla - led to the socalled 'Klipra connection'
Chanson de Roland - led to the french honor code with duels
Icelandic sagas - Norway/Iceland = Egypt/Israel?
Ostarrichi - led to the phenomenon of [terror-and-]monkey-business?
Old Church Slavonic - ?
Tocharian A/B - Location A/B?

Impressive is the list of british PM's: D.Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson.

Why is this such a grave crime against other cultures? Why were the cultures brought nearly down under the burden of an old paper? The answer is likely to be in this article: It tells that the oldest extant occurrence of a word defines its position in the blue metre (here from an anglophonic viewpoint) - which means that an old swindle document can completely alter this interpretation. Therefore, in order for the logic in the new formalized collective consciousness to get the right form and not a fraudulous form which has to be torn down again later by wars and epidemics, it is of complete importance that the manuscripts are not fraud. This is likely to be the reason why it is so important.

A good theory is that Napoleon collected his empire and lost at Waterloo for that single reason of telling the britons "can we get the truth, please". If it were for spreading an empire of power, he would probably have won even there. ('St.Helena' = 'Chanson de Roland'?)

The same could have been the reason for Hitler and his war against England.

Marxism and similar theories has tried to go around the problem by postulating completely different reasons for history, but it is not certain that it helps much.

But now I have written the blue metre PEB and the authenticity of the dubious documents can be verified. It had been completed for a few days when I was attacked by a terrible cough in the summer 2010 and the completion of the book (the hand-work) for self-publication was done with a towel on the lap - an ordinary handkerchief had no chance to handle the situation. I suspected that the work had been hijacked by power-oriented administration - could be even stamped secret. British Labour elected new leader 'Ed Miliband' - which I took as a proof that my fresh book had been recognized for its value in dating (over a millenial span). There were riots in Germany, [1/7: as the police informed me about]. Could be, though, that the cough was only because I was exhausted after the work - I dont know. Or that I had to self-publish such a book. And nobody tells me anything - that is probably a scandal in light of the extreme importance this can have for the development of history. It must be understood that if a 3-400 year old fundamental problem in politics has been solved, all the old plans for the coming century (not to speak of all the plans for the coming centuries with all the Adolfs around) must be put aside. I personally believe that this situation can be a part of the coronavirus crisis. It is the people who decide if the pandemic shall go up or down. If the global culture has come too far off the metaphysical reality, it cannot continue and must take a break and find other ways.

Today I looked a little at the Decameron. Is it really possible that this is fraud? Botticelli's 'four tavolas' on a theme from one of the stories is well known: It is the story about Nastagio degli Onesti told on day 5 story 8. It looks as a groundsolid proof that these artworks are based on Boccaccio's story. However, I noticed that the most important elements in these four artworks are contained in the story I tell in my volume 3, chapter 24, story 9 - the dark path I walked one evening along a railway line (like that rider) when I hit upon a man dressed in white clothes lying 'traversari' with his legs out in the path - I nearly stumbled across them. It was on the same place where I (before or later) was attacked by a dog which closed its jaws over my upper thigh just where it lands into the buttock - I shook it off and the animal was comforted by its owner who gave it some icecream to lick. And it was just on the opposite side of the railway line compared to where I had met the two dogs I describe in 'dogs paradox', the summary of the prose story 'And hang under the Justcan keys'. These dogs were not trained, but I cannot be certain if the dog with the jaws could have been, even if I doubt it. (It probably only wanted to tell me something). As I showed in this theory and somewhat also in this, there are reasons to believe that the pandemic, at least in its early phases, followed the logic in my work on the 'archetype' called 'dogs paradox'. Botticelli painted also the Treblinka mystery in the form of the Birth of Venus.

'Rita' in my school class 1970-71 could have been a name taken to mean swedish 'to draw', like that apparent red-nose figure on the Ostarrichi document. She used to wear her schoolbooks in a shoulder bag. Another classmate was Leif called 'Lucky', like the last word?

This suggests that the story told in Decameron day 5 story 8 is of archetypal value and therefore Botticelli is not a proof that Boccaccio was available to Botticelli. Could 'bocca-accio' have been the reason for my cough in the summer 2010? ['Boka-er-tju' = 'the book is thief'].

Could my home in the years 1971-76 in Labråten 58 have got its number from this Decameron 5-8, the fifth day, the 8th story? It could even have served to mean that the 'Kennedy curse' is a natural thing in human sexuality.

My guess is that if the Decameron should have been a later fabrication, it could have been made on basis of Botticelli's four 'tavolas' and other known mysteries by italian masters of the day.

See this study with mention of 'tripod' mysteries. Tripods of wood (for sitting), tripods of bronze (for holding the soup), the aristorcrats seated around the table with the local king at the end.

This could be from the world of 'Shijing'.

The Decameron was first printed in 1470, tells sources. This 'editio princeps' has also a page 58 (search this page for 'Deo gratias'). I noticed the idea that the story from Hütteldorfer Station took place after the death of prince Philip - but I do not believe that it was him in 'editio' form. Page 58 is far from day 5 story 8. In older days new unread books had to be opened with a paperknife - the book was said to be 'spretta' if it had been opened. (The word is or was also used in slang for 'opening a banknote', that is, turning a single 100 banknote into a lot of 10's plus even some additional coins). The book is 'halv-spretta' ('half opened') if only the first pages, say, up to 58 or thereabout, are opened. 'Hals' = 'throat' - and hence this story (including the death of Aldo Moro in Italy) could be a theme. 'Bretta' is 'folded'. See also this file for 'Frodadottir' - and the obvious parallelism to the possible archetypal incident in Hütteldorfer Strasse on 12 april 2021.

Conclusion is that the blue metre = a logic in the collective historic consciousness is to be developed and that means that the old swindle must down. But Napoleon's and Hitler's methods were not right for telling this - at least it could not continue that way. It also had the unfortunate effect that, since people did not want more Hitler, the opposite came to get all the sympathy after the war - and hence it seems (as is my conception) that 'international secret intelligence services' could have developed as a power factor out of this situation - as an offshot from the same british project as could have given rise to the fabricated documents that were the cause of the story. Could be the most important thing could be to delimit the 'extended authorities' of those services and publish my blue-metre book 'instead', so to speak. Left-right seems to be used for keeping the old system up and going for yet some time. The world does not need more of that mythos-making such as a story from the Decameron installed into the collective historic consciousness. The 3-400 year old ways of thinking power by deceiving the people and public opinion must come to an end.

PS The book is not thief, and one should not let the historic swindle continue by leaping onto a new surfboard. That is another reason why the book should be published - and old plans of swindle allegations against the PTRSIM PIK may have been known since long and can be published. I mean, if the 'wiki'-pedia etc complex soon is the only serious and reliable information source on the web, against an ocean of 'intelligence business' pages that call for your accept of their dubious cookies, if that is called 'wiki' because of my elder sister's name Vibeke Grøver as a Wiki vs. me as 'bedrøvelig' = 'deplorable' (see the 'news in finnish language' under this file), it could be a project going back to 'skjulte bort lufta' in 1964 or 1965. There could be a norwegian (?) intelligence project that aims at claiming that she wrote my works (cp. also the story of 'Charlie Hebdo') - which need not mean that she is involved, I dont know about that. It is better to reveal the details in such an 'intelligence project' today than to wait untill the next world war settles the issue by letting a new Hitler bite the dust in his heroic defence of the (unpronounced?) authenticity of my authorship. The game of politics has probably grown out from the impossibility of proving that a historic document was false - but then serious politics should rather dig their own mass graves (burying the old problems that were their rationale) today than letting the new surfboard create a new world of political games.

Added 1 juli 2021: Vibeke Grøver went to a Steiner institution in Aberdeen in the mid 70's and worked there for a year and came back with Nick. The word 'nikk' is norwegian for 'nod' and the plan could be that if he later be called to witness on the question "did she write poetry in those days", he could answer with a 'nod', supposed to mean 'yes' although it could mean 'not'. He stayed in Norway untill Vibeke Grøver got pregnant and then he went back to England. She gave birth to Camilla, a name suggested by me (then you can call her 'Milla', said I). The clever political plan could be to use the strategy of 'banknods' since Camilla Collett was on the banknotes in those days and hence, tells perhaps this smart strategy, I could have got the idea from those banknotes.

I hope that is not the bank-not's of the current days. Or even 'banknods'?

See also Heide-Steen's news in sami language (5 minutes every day there used to be on national radio of these news in sami language): "Jahn-Otto Johansa" (Jahn Otto Johnansen, a wellknown norwegian journalist in the 60's-70's) = 'ja-NOT-of-jo-hand-sa[id]'? The joke is based on the idea that norwegian language shines through the sami in such a way that news could be told that otherwise could not. There is a source on the internet which seems to indicate that the 'sami news' are from 1972.

I dont know if 'teapot' is a relevant concept, but if the teapot were on the 'banknot[e]s', that could be the poem 'Dining-room tea' of Rupert Brooke etc.

The political plan could have been to use me as a turnaround principle for getting western control with China, such that a recognition of my authorship as being somebody else's could mean that the west controls China, while the plan was probably also that I should come to be an alcoholic who wrote some 'trembling' poems of some value but the damage done by lifting these over onto another poet would not have been too big, could have been the plan. Ahja, all these overly smart strategies could have their origins in the problem of authenticity on historic documents - unsolvable problems perhaps untill I wrote my PEB, and then one cannot follow the old plans of hijacking my authorship as if it were about a few alcoholized poems. The (copy of the) official father told in the 1970's the story of the man who had worked as running boy for the grocer through 40 years when the grocer decided that he would need to get his reward for the many years of work: "From this day on you will no longer be called Charlie ['Kalle'] here among us, you will be called Andersen". (This could be the 'Charlie Hebdo', and their emphasis on cartoons on islamic life could have been about the problems of 'heb-do' of the body of the woman in the Hütteldorfer Straße/AraBe, as one of the Locations A/B). But clearly to follow such old plans when they no longer have nothing to do with the reality is not right. If my epidemiological theory can lead to cures against viruses, pandemics, biologial weapons of mass destruction, could be even cancer, will I not be credited for this important work because of old plans which probably include the making of new hitlers 'for getting the truth, please'? If my PEB solves these most fundamental problems of politics, will I not be credited because these old plans of 'politics' tell that Charlie will be gehebt only to Andersen but not much more? Of course all those old nazi plans must be terminated and the world must return to reality.

The current aftermath of the centuries of swindle is a disaster. If one reads the data in this file, a modern mentality could be inclined to think 'how can I turn these data into some organized action to make things happen?' Of course such thinking is but an echo of oldtime swindle. It is of utmost importance to credit the source.