Auschwitz

Auschwitz

John Bjarne Grover

This article is written on the background of the assumption of the existence of a socalled PTRSIM PIK program that more or less completely dominates modern politics - while it is held on a high secrecy classification that has prevented progress in politics for many decades. It is assumed that I am a socalled PTRSIM PIK. The allegations in this article probably rest on these assumptions - however, the validity of these allegations depends on a verification of the referred-to phenomena. It may be very urgent to have these phenomena verified.

On the hypothetical assumption (and on this theory I have little or no substantial evidence) that my official father 1969-1990 under the name 'John Grøver' was Adolf Hitler, such as the 1973 Yom Kippur war could have been indicative of - by the logic that 'kippur' in norwegian sounds associatively like 'slippers' on the Idle Feetler and hence the 'Day Slippers' war lasted untill 26 october, the day before John Grøver's (born Jensen) birthday 27 october. (I think The Beatles had a song called 'Day Tripper'). I observe the following corollaries:

I have earlier pointed to the function of a 'prism' that I seem to have been assigned in the link between Auschwitz and the postwar ÖVP = Österreichische Volks-Partei. It is the cartoons of the magazine The New Yorker which seem to have this function of encoding the 'prism': Auschwitz closed on 27 January 1945 and ÖVP opened (was founded in a constitutive meeting) 80 days later, on 17 april 1945. For the day when ÖVP was founded, the New Yorker Magazine had cartoons that encoded the 5 names 1) John F.Kennedy, 2) JFK 'jr.' (his erection, probably), 3) John Grøver, 4) Ragna Grøver and 5) my name. 12 years, 2 months and 3 weeks later my newborn head was opened (according to the evidence in this brain image by MRT Marienhilf) and it is possible that JFK was present and masturbated a spurt on my cortex and somebody scissored away a part of my occipital lobe in the brain. For the day (or week) when this happened, the weekly New Yorker Magazine had cartoons that encoded the names of those people who were present at the founding meeting of ÖVP in 1945, according to the data referred to in this article.

For those present in 1957 there is the additional possible function of my mid name 'Bjarne' which seems to have been assigned the function of encoding the three females in the family: John Bjarne Grover → John F.Tone Grover, Bjarne → Rajb-ne = 'the rapes' that could be potentially associated (also by name) with the official mother 'Ragna' of my puberty 1970, in particular by the 'backwards' theory that it was my own penis that had been transplanted over from me to her while I would have got another similar organ (without knowing about it), and the elder sister Vibeke would be the name of Bjarne = Biame = Bima[k]e = Vibeke. More recent potentially political or 'intelligence' initiatives for keeping this complex 'hot' could be the matter of the socalled 'LGBT' = 'lesbian-gay-bisexual-trans', lesbian-gay for the theory that JFK were rebuilt to my younger sister, the official mother would have been 'transgender' of 1970 if she carried my transplanted penis, and the name of the elder sister being similar to 'Vibeksuel' = 'bisexual'. Whether these ideas derive from the name or the name from early such plans I cannot know.

There could also be a 1-2-3 signification assigned to the theory of child abuse in the years 1957-59 - 1 = head opening soon after birth, 2 = rape at age 6 months, 3 = injection of horror chemicals at age 18 months. 1 and 2 are easy identifications, adding perhaps another '2' (for the '1-2-2-3') at puberty time, only the 3 is somewhat obscure. 'O' is often used for 'female' in norwegian language - hence 'o Bjarne' could mean 'the female Bjarne'.

(This theory of my mid name being such a heavy burden is felt by me in my life - if I omit the mid name then I could feel persecuted by 'ther others' being of that kind, while if I use it then it is more under my control and could be negated thereby - but it is perhaps not the best of names for me. The name of my official grandfather 'Bjarne Eidsvig' could have been an indication that 'eit svig' = 'a treason' or 'eid-svig' = 'oath-treason' suggesting perhaps a principled role of an 'octogon' could have been planned since his official birth 6 july 1899 - if the story were planned already then and his person assigned a role in it at that time, thereby assuming also the authenticity of his person).

This means that the 12 years 2 months and 3 weeks = '1223' between 1945 and 1957 is the defining interval. It seems that ever since this day in 1957, the names of the central persons in ÖVP, or maybe it is primarily the 'Ob'-men - such as when there is a new 'Klubobmann' - the name could have been preheralded in the cartoons of The New Yorker 12 years 2 months and 3 weeks in advance - and this would mean that this '1223' is the defining link between my person and ÖVP. 'Ob-menna' = 'the Ob-men', while 'opp-m-[h]en[d]a' = 'hands up'. (This is speculation, though: I have not checked much data on this).

The theory is that this USA-witz-e-blatt 'The New Yorker' by its cartoons is the link between Auschwitz and ÖVP.

The 80 days between the closing of Auschwitz and the opening of ÖVP could be the basis for the 'octogon'. There is also the theory that the 'octogon', if it is constructed as a political program, could have been constructed on basis of aspects of the genetic Stammbaum of me qua PTRSIM PIK, the very essential element of this story. There have been hints and redundancies pointing to such a phenomenon, but I have not had the chance to verify it more closely since I have never got any information on my Stammbaum, nor have I got it verified whether the 'octogon' were an organized program.

However, it I am assigned the role of being the link between Auschwitz and ÖVP, and hence Auschwitz-nazi politics could have wanted to keep archived data on my biography secret, it follows not only that the 'octogon' could be of essential importance but also that the role of symmetries in a new nano-technological world generally could have the implication that Auschwitz could be secretly identified as the tacit model of ÖVP, often in government in Austria - and, even worse, that the plan or effect of this could be to that the new nano-technological world would come to be defined or developed as entirely anti-semitic or racist generally. This could extend back to the formation of the state of Norway in 1814, assumed to be at the beginning of the construction of the Stammbaum of my person for this role of PTRSIM PIK, when the state of Norway was declared as a new independent kingdom principly free of any jews or jesuits - it was planned to be an antisemitic region guaranteed free of jews. However, the new quasi 'independent' and antisemitic kingdom went immediately into a union with Sweden with whom they shared king untill 1905 when the first norwegian king was announced, a danish prince. I have no opinion on the theory that there never existed anything 'norwegian' before 1905. Ibsen wrote his 'Eyolf Little' in 1896, I think it was, and it seems that Adolf Hitler could have been planned before 1905 and made his nazi empire on basis of mock of the assumed PTRSIM PIK Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Confusion could spread fog on the landscape if one considers the theory that modern 'intelligence terror', of type potentially associated with the concept of 'knullerud' (cp. the name of 'Charles de Gaulle' commenting on this), could receive their popular support in the form of the program of 'the people's justified resistance and battle against the symmetries'. This could also be a part of the reason why it seems that Hitler is still up and going - since he could appear to be the opposite of this 'rule of the symmetries'.

I have verified this theory of a systematic '1223' link between Auschwitz and ÖVP to some extent but not carried the investigations very far. But the data should be available e.g. on the internet or in the collection of the cartoons of Mankoff 2004 (ed).

Now for the possible scandal: If, from 1969 to 1990, my official father under the name John Grøver was Adolf Hitler, the question is whether my life in the Grøver house in Norway - from puberty to 19, my teen years - was 'the same' as the life of the jewish genetics in Auschwitz. Was it? There are some reasons to believe that there could have been some systematic link: In 1975 I was tortured - I developed a throat abscess which is easily cured with a pill of antibiotics but they did not try this simple method - instead the official father (or rather his copy since 1969) took me to a specialist in a concrete basement in Oslo who tried to open the abscess with his mechanic tools. It lasted for a while and must be classified as torture without any other purpose (since the abscess would soon have been down with an antibiotic pill). The official father stood watching and there went a jerk through his leg muscles at the first puncture of the tools - he later produced something similar once when he was watching a football game on TV when his leg went out in a kick after the imaginary ball right before the goal.

I was not starved such as the prisoners of Auschwitz but my muscles remained undeveloped. In 1975 I was first down with mononucleosis which left me skinny and after that the throat abscess made eating difficult and the body weight was rather low in the spring 1975. I have speculated if I at that time were given a 'pulver' that stopped the re-development of the muscles, even if the body height (188 cm) probably is normal and should not have been taller. I was not as thin as those famous photos from Auschwitz but not so very far from it.

I have also speculated if there were rapes of my puberty in the year 1970-71. The jewish people were raped by Hitler, and it is possible that his 'dritte Reich' was simply a short code for my own 13 year old penis being the 'Reich' = 'reach-out' towards the 'dritte' in my rectum - the Reich then being used for raping me after it had been transplanted from myself onto my official mother ('rajB-ne'). If so, it could have meant that Hitler could have been a 'reverse' agent for England - which then also could have meant that he was 'me' = my original penis? Ideas that I should have been an agent are false but could have their origin in this - that if Hitler were considered an agent for England it could mean that my penis was - which also perhaps could have implied ideas of a link between the official mother and England? The 'heil Hitler' sign could have been a symbol for this 'dritte Reich' - the assumed 'rajB-ne' of the jewish genetics.

It is said that the gold fillings were pulled out of the dead people in Auschwitz. I had no gold fillings but in the same year 1970-71 all my young teeth, which had been white and healthy up to then, were drilled up by the school dentist and filled with amalgam in what could have resembled e.g. the train line running into Auschwitz.

If I had been abused so badly in my childhood as this story could suggest, albeit this assumption is so far largely on a theoretic basis with only little empirical proof, it could have been felt as appropriate that I could have got a disability pension from the age of 18 - since I would have had only small chances on the career market of competition, and employment would easily have led to new abuses in the formal attachment to the society - in particular if the abuses had been made on behalf of or under the protection of the state. However, there could have been some truth in the idea that a state pension could have made these things easier for me - but only "Arbeit macht frei" if I would have wanted to escape the problem of the state attachment in an economic dependence in the relation to the state. The theory of me as 'prism' between Auschwitz and postwar government of Austria would then tell that this idea of absence of a disability pension at age 18 or 19 (1976) could have been the reason why they put this famous sign "Arbeit macht frei" over the entrance gate to Auschwitz.

[5/11-22: 'Bøljete' is norwegian for 'waveform-like', hence 'di-sa-bøljete' for the sign to be resembling 'disability' over the entrance gate at the end of the train line with its trackswitch 'pensen' = 'disability pension'. When Arbeit macht frei occurred also at Theresienstadt and Groß-Rosen, it could have been for my name 'Theresienstadt' = the family females of 'Bjarne' and 'Groß-Rosen' = 'Grover' or even 'Grøver'. Dachau would then be the opening of the head not long after birth - which perhaps could have been [a part of] the reason for a disability pension. It is noticed in the wikipedia article that the 'B' is even upside-down - which could be telling of a special 'half B' = 'leftsided gynaeomasty' as a symptom of such early child abuse against the 'Schutz' of nature. Were the entire holocaust - or even WWII - a british 'intelligence project' on behalf of Buckingham for constructing global royal power by way of the PTRSIM PIK? Then republicans all over the world should have it on their party programs that England must close down their monarchy].

Once while in the TV-room downstairs in Labråten, the official father went out in the entree room and came back throwing a pastille/lozenge into his mouth. 'Past ille er' = 'the past is bad'. The entree could have signified this "Arbeit macht frei". Entrecote ('entree-kott') is not a T-bone but 'Past [h]iller' could have resembled 'Adolf Hiller/Hitler'.

Could be there were reflexes of most characteristic aspects in the lives of the jewish people in Auschwitz in my life in Labråten in Fredrikstad in the years 1971-1976. I do not have enough data on Auschwitz to assess this theory but would believe that the question could be interesting - and there clearly is at least some basis for this theory.

This would mean that the 'prism' between The New Yorker and ÖVP is no small matter and that it could function for the purpose of getting Auschwitz through as a principle of government in modern nanotechnological times. Austria borders by the Burgenland border onto Hungary. Adolf Hitler lived in Beingasse (at the corner to Felberstrasse) and my more than a decade in the parallel Zinckgasse would mean that I have been 'beining' around in the same district as he did a hundred years earlier.

The superscandal is that I have never been told a word about this - if it is the fact and not only fancies from my side that the years in Labråten were preparing for an Auschwtz formation of the austrian society or the global society generally. It should be possible to find out of it if it is a fact.

If this be the case, then of course Austria - often under ÖVP government - is perhaps the last country in the world I should have resided in - but nobody has said a word and I have not the resources needed for finding a permanent solution in another country. It then would count as a scandal that nobody has been able to help me move on to another country.

Politics

Administration is and always was a necessary part of the society - somebody must be in charge of the distribution of tasks and resources - but politics may be a rather new phenomenon. Is it more than a lot of people building a new game on the basis of the substructure created by poetry and poetic logic - such as the new logic without logical operators could be indicative of - without the politicians being willing to admit it? Could be that is just the story of Hitler and the reason why no politician has been able to downgrade it and tell it to me - or to the world in general.

My theory is that Hitler could have been an agent for England (this theory has a large explanatory potential) and that the story is a simple wish of England to swap roles with the jews (being at the foundations of the christian creed) after the breach with the Vatican did not come out as they had perhaps hoped for. In addition, the french revolution relativized the royal power to the monarch being a mere historical person and by way of the PTRSIM PIK intrigue they hoped to regain an absolute power by the royals being vestiged in divine feathers - something which a mere president cannot present. The combination of these two elements could produce a quasi-divine monarch who would aspire towards complete global control by way of terror.

That 'politics' may be more or less the same as 'parasiting on poetry' emerges from the simple fact that they have not told the true story. If Hitler were an agent for England, of course the peoples of the world would have been badly in need of knowing it.

Why should it not be told today? It is very possible that the political 'struggle' of modern times is a balance between republicans fingering with the truth of history, this triggering terror from monarchism as a threat in return, to which the republican answer is that the republicans can postpone the truthtelling for yet some time, yes they can, if only the terrorists calm down their terror. This situation seems to constitute a sort of 'terror balance' which means that the truth is postponed over and over again - such as the alleged travels to the moon in 1969-71 (when the computer was still without better storage media than tape recordings unless simply punched into cardboard strips) - when is the world going to get the true story? - and the unfortunate situation could have come to accumulate that the best thing could be to just forget about the past and let the whole PTRSIM PIK & Adolf Hitler story be buried and forgotten like an old battle axe. But clearly this would be an extremely unfortunate solution for which the burden is dumped onto the poetry - to the effect that monarchists and republicans jointly enjoy the abuse of the poetry for shining side by side in the newspapers and media screens.

On UN day 24 october 2022 I published my 'Collected works' in 4 volumes here on my homepage on the internet. That is more than 5700 pages and some of those would have been potential book publications had I not been so burdened down by apparent political intrigue and abuse. Thereafter I published some comments on mainly volume 2 - the links being these:

My literary work in 4 volumes
Comments on some poems and their parallel texts in 'The Endmorgan Quartet' (25 october 2022)
Comment on Goethe, Li Bai and the 'Malva' image (2 november 2022)
Comment on possible 'non-euclidean entropies' (3 november 2022)
Comment on the 'arbitrarity' (4 november 2022)

See particularly the latter of these, the one from today 4 november 2022: Now what will this article lead to? It should lead to renewed inspirations among poets, literati and scholars for studying my work and writing further poetry and theoretic observations on it. But if politics cannot refrain from abusing it for their own interests, that is what could prompt the formation of new terror on the same themes - because that is what can lend justification to the political abuse hiding behind the idea that "there is still too much terror on this work and we must wait with fruitful attention to it untill the terror is down - in the mean time the politicians can use it for promoting their own interests and thereby contribute to getting the terror down". Of course they have no right to abuse my work. It is likely that all this circus is a lot of pretext and vicious circle only.

The british tories elected new leader Sunak on 24 october and he started a new government on 2 october. Benjamin Netanjahu just won the election in Israel. I found these two photos (photo 1 from Jerusalem Post, photo 2 as screenshot from the listing under 'Yahoo Suche Bildsuchergebnisse' from this souce) from his campaign on the internet. They could look like lifted out from my study of the Malva image - photo 1 was taken on the day before I published the 'Malva' comments which I then had worked with for several days - and when Netanjahu's Likud party won with absolute majority in the election, if he made use of this Malva image or other aspects of e.g. that article it could well have been my optimism and enthusiasm by the publication of this 'angel of Abraham' only a good week or so before the election that contributed to such massive support - an election majority the dimension of which also could been a little unexpected.

If so, if Netanjahu won the election on a wave of jewish enthusiasm from my 4 volumes having been just published on the internet, is that a legal election victory if elements of it were used in the campaign? (I dont know if it were used in his campaign - this is theories on basis of two news photos only). Or would it have been I who won the election but Netajnahu cashed in the victory? It is true that some of the apparent resistance to my publication seemed to fall down again by this election, but that could also be because the work thereby could have seemed to re-conform to the status quo of many decades.

HOW LONG IS THIS FARCE GOING TO CONTINUE?

It may have been going like this for many years - in many countries - and when is it going to lead to some progress for me and my work and my chances to continue the work? It cannot continue with me as the secret driving motor for politics in many countries.

I point particularly to this essential point: If it be the case that I am PTRSIM PIK and Adolf Hitler's power is based essentially on that phenomenon, it is a matter of extreme importance for the world to come to knowledge of. In particular it must not be the mixmax story that the more my work progresses, the more makes Adolf Hitler new career while my conditions of life remain as they always were. This factor remains incomprehensible for democracy as long as it remains secret. Throughout the last 24 years of my life (since the summer 1998) I have spent all too much time on doing the information work on these matters which the politicians should have done - in an attempt to get this complex up in daylight. I do the work which they should have done - while it seems that they are inclined to surf on the historical wave from my work and do not even credit the source at all. This makes the swap-function between me as poet and Adolf Hitler as politician even more acute.

It is I who have to write and publish this article for the internet today, being completely exhausted from all this nazipazi writing through many years and being in desperate need of holiday, and even if these problems could be well known to all politicians it seems that none of them try to get it up into daylight enough to stop the progress of the next european hitlerish apocalypse.

ALL PARTS OF THE HISTORY OF PTRSIM PIK AND ADOLF HITLER MUST BE TOLD IN DETAIL FOR THE PUBLIC.

It is probably very possible that if somebody collects enough initiative to present the story for a court, the court will certainly say that this program is strictly forbidden and the secrecy on it is even more forbidden and the court sentences the secrecy stamp as illegal and downgrades it to PUBLIC.

But the politicians wait for me to do it? They hope to be able to tremble their accusing index fingers towards me and say "Youu, Mr. Grover, have not brought this to the court!!! Youu are guilty of these war crimes!!!" and they help themselves with another surveillance copy of my recent writings for having something to launch on the international political arena of for winning a new election.

It may be as bad as the conclusion that modern politics is nothing but abuse of the poet and the PIK. An old ('british'?) idea is that if the politicians (ab)use the poetry, then the world will turn poetic. That is of course a serious misunderstanding. Abuse of the poetry makes of course the world anti-poetic and hence a new Adolf Hitler can come to rise like a phoenix bird from the ashes or ideas of the former.

Please notice that my work is for serious study and NOT for business. If a bank reads this article and starts a new ad campaign on some aspects of, say, 'bookprint' and 'd' and 'exclamation mark' or something like that, it is of course strictly illegal to use any part of my intellectual property for commercial use without crediting the source. It is probably the 'intelligence mafia' of more or less international royalist or monarchic loyalties or inclinations who have invited various parts of the society to partake in the feast of abuse of my work. It is all this which must be brought to an end - but why does it seem to be left to little me to tidy up in this mess?

THERE IS NO REASON ANYWHERE WHY THE FULL STORY OF PTRSIM PIK AND ADOLF HITLER SHOULD NOT BE TOLD TO THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLES WHO HAVE A VERY ESSENTIAL RIGHT TO KNOW ALL OF IT.

IT SHOULD BE OUT OF THE QUESTION TO CONTINUE WITH ANY FORM OF PTRSIM PIK.

The US republicans could put this promise on their midterm election campaigns - there are still a few days left - that they will downgrade and publish these details of the history. They are not a bunch of criminals, I hope?

It is the construction of a very sick and blasphemous sort of terrorist quasi 'religion' which 'services' seem to intend the abuse of my work for - and of course the people do not like such blasphemy smeared on their interface of public truth.

If the terror in Vienna on 2 november 2020, starting right under the window of the lawyer I had used for sending some necessary letters, cp. the terrorist behaving like "I have to pee[ss]", by russian 'pismo', seriously influenced the US presidential election the following day, the reason could expectedly have been all and only that the PTRSIM PIK were held secret. A downgrading of this would have made the terror futile as political tool.

The worst part of the story is perhaps that the politicians, even if they could have won an election by sailing on the PIK mythos, seem to want me to continue residing in Zinckgasse in Vienna for an enhanced function as prism for the Auschwitz formation of the new world - while I have not the needed economic resources for moving to another country. That is a terrible scandal. It would have been easy for a politician or his party sailing on my work to acquire a house in another country than Austria and sell it to me against a small sum of money and by contract getting the house back again for the same sum when I exit.

The question is this: Is 'politics' a new phenomenon parasiting on poetry and the PTRSIM PIK? It is out of the question to agree to continue with this sort of program. The world must return to reality for the construction of a new peaceful co-existence wherein power-struggle intrigues and secrets have no function at all.

It must now come to an end that I do all the telling-work which the politicians should have done: They must learn to tell it themselves so that mummy does not have to tidy up on the children's room for them - the legos and teddys must be tidied up by themselves. It is perhaps not probable that they will succeed in this - but they have to grow old enough to see the importance of it. Could be they are not so interested in the old toys any longer.

The alleged threat of a nuclear war is all and only a function of the secrecy - it is not the other way round.

Of course the politicians want to keep it secret - all criminals hope to escape the law by keeping the crimes secret - that is probably what these secrecy stamps are.

Source:

Mankoff, R. (ed): The complete cartoons of The New Yorker. Including 2 CDs with 68647 cartoons ever published in the magazine. Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers, New York 2004.