Introductory remark

John Bjarne Grover

It seems that my fate on earth so far in life was to be the secret of the 'International Secret Intelligence Services' who wanted to abuse me as their tool for modelling their own interface to the public - for me to be the sheep's face (of jewish genetics) behind which rested the wolves of the 'services'.

The story is always the same: The government has to base their power on the truth which they get from the 'intelligence services', but since that makes them dependent on these 'intelligence services', the services start winding in the power and start serving power before truth - untill the government has to 'face the fact' that they have less power than the services. But that is when the politicians should seek their mandate in the people and not in the 'services'. That is why the relation and difference between people and services are of utmost importance - and that is what my role in the mythos construction could have been about.

Adolf Hitler was the ultimate articulation of the 'intelligence services' - he declared war on every legal government and the destruction of the war won the war. After the war the 'intelligence services' have been consolidating their powers around the world. Even the Vatican had to give in a little and left the principle of italian popes, at least for some time, with John Paul II. The next pope Benedict XVI from Germany had even been 18 years old when it was still obligatory with membership in the nazi party - and hence there has even been a pope who was a 'nazi' during WWII. The current pope is not an agent (except perhaps as 'agent' for God) but he comes from Argentine. Could be this tells of an urgency in the historic situation.

My life seems to have been a constant struggle against the informational encapsulation of those services who tap my life and work and spread it around as if it were their own - the sheep's interface to society. It was soon after the war that the program of 'containing the beast' was articulated in USA - the 'containment theory' - and it is likely to be just this.

The story is simple and summed up as follows: There exists the phenomenon of 'lapis philosophorum' - the philosophers' white stone - as the 'ex nihilo' matter par excellence. It forms out of nothing and seems to always have the same form and size (this constancy is my theory - I hope to find verification of it) - which means that the white stone is the human psyche in material form. It is a mystery which is hard to understand. On this stone there are certain patterns and shapes which tell of the mythological elements in the story of Jesus Christ - there is the Virgin Mary on the sleeper's cheek (which can be turned?), the suffering of the Christ, the Calvary, the resurrection (cp. also the two hearts in the vision of the 'Miraculous Medal' of 1830) etc - and what do you think of Peter's denial (foretold), the institution of the Lord's supper (cp. the the recursion of the 'Boxed Table' of GLIMT etc), or the Gethsemane (the greek spelling Γεθσημανι could look like three Kennedy names - as for the ship's prow reaching that 'heavenly shore')? I add this riddle - is it 'the unknown day and hour' (Mk.13:32-37)? (When did Mao die?) The correlation of Jesus' life with this white stone is easily understood if the stone simply is the human psyche: If the divine Christ should step down into human life, he had to go through these elements of the human reality - only then would he be both human and divine. But it may be that the theory was formed not so long after Christ's death, could be some decades or centuries, could be only in the second millenium, that the story of Christ is a mythos - a piece of fiction - which is constructed by the 'International Secret Intelligence Services' (a small group of folks who met under a naked lightbulb) on basis of the universals in the white stone, and that the gospels were written on basis of this. That version of the gospels is what can be recognized as the logic of Satan: It is hard to take and it can be quite powerful indeed.

The ancient hindu rites of Rigveda seem to describe how they routinely made such white stones, crushed them and drank them as part of the religious service. This was later recognized as 'the same' as the holy communion of the christian church - and the sport maay have been to identify this rigvedic evidence in sanskrit as 'the same' as the books of Moses in hebrew. That is the logic of Satan who thereby can rescue the christian people from falling into doubt by a midway solution called antisemitism - and it is possible that this 'smart intrigue' was used for driving a 'service wedge' (divide-and-conquer) in between catholics and lutherans from about 1500 onwards - which also is when the european settlement in USA started.

How many million indians lived on the american continent? Probably very many. Hitler said '6 million' - but the number may of course have been much bigger. That is the story of the difficult territorial rights of the modern americans - that the indians must have been exterminated in terrible pogroms and that the modern americans have no legal rights to their continent. That is the beast that haunts them - that they have to leave the place - and the program of 'containing the beast' was american. The modern version of this is the program of driving people 'off the place' with injections.

The difficult territorial rights and the ways to solve this problem is the political program of the US democrat party who tries to find smart solutions to the problem - smart enough to function. Could be the alleged territorial rights are mainly a pretext for terror? Can they resist a tempting offer when it comes? That is what the white stone was used for - to provide a rationale called 'divine sanction for terror' for being able to claim that the terror against the indians was with divine sanction - and that should suffice for granting them the needed territorial rights. It is based on certain aspects of Virgin Mary on the white stone identified as the same as the socalled 'hungarian HYMEN' phenomenon - therefore nazism was constructed internationally (1929 crash on Wall Street etc etc) from out of Austria and therefore Hitler's government was with names just behind the austro-hungarian border of Hegyeshalom - such as 'Kimle' with Himmler and 'Györ' with Göring etc. It is possible that 'Mosonmagyaróvar' simply is my name - 'mosdo' = 'loo' = 'john' - and that I was planned along with Hitler by the 'services' in the late 1800. Ibsen wrote a play called 'Eyolf Little' in 1896 (Eyolf died young - whether another later took his identity is not mentioned), along with 'John Gabriel Borkmann': This 'Borkmann' is likely to be the Satan with the two horns of chinese script. My role was probably planned to be the flagship of the services whose wolves was planned to dress up as the sheep of my life and work - whom they tap without asking for permission.

That seems to have been the problem of my life - to get in normal contact with the society without my social interface (and professional career) being controlled by the 'service's. They seem to have spread my work as theirs in the media - for gaining popular sheepy support while I am rejected as a 'Satan'. It is all those divide-and-conquer and similar strategies.

How can I have my books published? Submitting them to peer review by a publisher is only for digging their grave forever - very soon after the submission the publisher starts pumping out similar books written by service agents and after half a year mine is returned with the rejection 'not goodenough', 'not competitive'. It is only a massive success wave for nazism that comes out of a book submission from me. My blue metre 'POLAKK English Bloggi' is still unsubmitted and therefore it still has a chance - I hope that a decent publisher will contact me for asking for permission to publish it - that is the only chance my books have.

It seems that the 'International Secret Intelligence Services' some centuries ago started collecting all evidence of the philosophers' white stone - like a Simon Wiesenthal collecting evidence after the war - in the hope of being the only one's with the knowledge available. The public program has been that the white stone does not exist - how can anything be formed 'ex nihilo'? - in the hope of being the only ones in control of 'divine sanction for terror'. That is what they can offer governments and politicians - the power of terror controlled with good contacts in Heaven. Of course the 'lapis philosophorum' is everything else than terror intrigue.

My genetic parents seem to be jewish - could be that was organized in order to identify the Satan of the 'services' as jewish genetics - for yet another round of 'satanic antisemitism' on behalf of the 'services'.

It seems that a new Hitler was planned - springing out from Hungary-bordering Austria for unfolding in Germany once again - for the modern program of 'total power' by way of injections driving people off their subjective territory. That could be what my role as the 'beast' (jewish genetics) of Mosonmagyaróvar could have been about.

But now I have solved this riddle (when I wrote the blue metre) and found the hidden reason for the alleged 'divine sanction for terror' at the hungarian border and it should mean that the next Hitler will not come about - so people will not be 'shot out' in astronautic lonelinesses after all. I have also made (while I wrote the yellow metre) what probably is a 'lapis philosophorum' and that means that the stone can come out of the secret archives again. This is the good news of the website.

My own version of the story is that I was made for these rather special circumstances in order to write the socalled 'blue metre' which is a higher concept of time and solves many of the essential problems.

I am not an agent. I am the identity I always was and remember back to the age of 8 months in the spring 1958 - when Nelly Sachs sent a poem to Paul Celan, a poem which is the contents of my memory: I remember the corridor and have verified the address and I am registered with my name on that address on that time - I had not yet learnt to walk. I do not support or work for the 'intelligence services' - my work is for regaining the optimal conditions for a new spirituality with a blossoming cultural life of music and poetry and truth as the guiding light of the sciences. I never got any information on the story or a mythos role for me - and what I present on this website is found by myself. I never even asked for or got classified data - since that is to agree to be involved in the intrigue if it means agreeing to secrecy obligations.



The 'intelligence services' I have talked of here should of course ideally have been the hallmark of truth and integrity and lawfulness, and the security of the state should ideally rest on just such pillars. It is not that I am against. When I say that 'I do not support or work for the 'intelligence services'' I mean the historic condition of these for the time being - or, more precisely, what I believe is the historic condition of these for the time being - but since those services are secret it follows that my beliefs about them are restricted and I talk on basis of meagre evidence - could be it is too meagre and general to make justified claims of being right in that suspicion. If the 'intelligence services' had been the hallmark of truth and integrity and lawfulness and if there had been no secrecy clauses on them, I could of course in principle have worked for them - although I have never done so and believe that I will never work for them either - since my view is that this is not possible under the historic conditions of our time. I emphasize this also since it is not impossible that parts of the 'services' could have abused my work under the pretext that I should have agreed to let myself be tapped and spread around by the tapping services - that is not true. I have never given any such permission. I have a pension since my career has been impossible (my idea, which I have not yet got verified, is that I for political abuse purposes was subjected to early child abuse - of a '1-2-3' kind which can be seen as summed up in the names of John, Robert and 'Ted' Kennedy - and that this leaves traces in the psyche which can resemble symptoms of schizophrenia - modern diagnostic metrics allow for 3 'light' symptoms such as unemployment, frequent change of residence as well as social dysfunction plus one 'heavy' symptom such as 'hearing voices' as sufficent for a diagnosis of schizophrenia) but that is not payment for tapped information. If I go to the left nothing happens but if I go to the right a bomb goes off somewhere - that does not mean that I am involved in terror - it rather means that the wolfy 'services' hide behind the sheepy surface of my life from which they tap the info - and it may be that the purpose is for the services to be accepted by the public while I am rejected as a 'beast of terror'. All this seems trivial - and it is important to emphasize that I am not involved in it in any sense at all. For example, I did not make a 'secret agreement' with parents or others in my youth - any such ideas that I should have a tipetop secret role or agreement are nonsense. If anybody should have made a bank account on my name with big money on it, that is not mine (I have so far, by early 2018, never owned more than 25.000 euros) and such intrigues would have been only for creating false ideas about an involvement of mine. I am the authentic author of my literary and scientific work and of what is written on this website, at least in the form it had when I put it out on the internet.


Added on 5 january 2018: I may have to add that there could be a conception among certain 'services' that my role is to be the author of literary works which could be installed into administration while my identity remains unknown and the works held secret. If anybody should claim so, it would be a terrible lie: Of course my work is not intended for abuse in administration, business, media etc - and of course they are meant to be published in book form available in bookshops and public libraries - with my name as the author on the front page. In the worst case, some 'services' could have spread my works in networks with a 'please help yourself - but let the author name remain secret', or, even worse, without mention of author. I hope such abuse (if there has been any of it) has come to a standstill and that it will be tidied up in. Of course, if any part of my work be used, the source (me) must be credited properly.

I mention this example: My work includes the blue metre which partly is based on the memory format in the collective consciousness which serves to delete a document from e.g. AD 1100 while it ensures to retain another document from e.g. AD 1200 - and this effect (that the eldest documented occurrence of one word is AD 1100 while for another word it is AD 1200 - in an apparently non-random fashion) is what can lend e.g. a feeling of 'divine sanction' to certain forms of terror - and that feeling seems to relate to the apparent 'deliberating consciousness' in that collective historic memory format - as if History looks at the administration that uses terror and tells that 'it is permitted', 'you are not guilty'. This is poetry which thereby incorporates in the esthetic form knowledge which the society normally has taken to be within the domain of administative logic. This could be the reason why it seems that society be incapable of respecting the borders of privacy for my work but seems (as is my impression) to take illegal copies and spread them around even before the work is finished. Clearly this is massively insulting and makes it difficult for the poet to be in any sensible relation to the society - in particular on background of the value which the completed work can have for the same society. What is the reason that society seems incapable of respecting my borders of privacy for a new work? (It is of course under such circumstances getting rather difficult to continue with new work - should that be surprising?). It is probably this unarticulated feeling in the society that 'this belongs to the field of administration' or 'this work can come to deprive us of our God-given right to use terror in administration'. It is possible that the novelty in my work is what makes it difficult to understand this - but if there is much abuse of my work, how come it seems difficult to hunt down the perpetrators and pay economic compensation to me? That is what a mature understanding of this problem should lead to.





© John Bjarne Grover
On the web 4 january 2018
Last updated 5 january 2018


An early version of this 'introductory remark' was
published on 5 december 2007, last updated on 21 july 2013.