Brief comments

Brief comments

John Bjarne Grover

Most recent entries first. For brief comments for earlier months see the end of this file

1 october 2025:

A telephone story (added to this article) and a historic document. (I should perhaps also, due to temporal concerns, mention this addition of today to another file).

5 october 2025:

In 1999 I was hospitalized with force on basis of a request from houseletter Erik Berstad and with the signature from the official mother Ragna Grøver. The law said that such a signature required 'regular contact' and I had not been in any form of contact with her since 1988 (= 11 years) except for two short telephone conversations in 1993. [17/10-25: I was also briefly in the funeral of the official father in 1990, that is true, and observed Ragna Grøver there but avoided her and exchanged no words - and there are the two brief encounters described in my diary novel]. (She had sent me a number of letters, though, which I had returned unopened to sender through the first 5 years or so - and after I stopped returning them, since the returns could have entailed a sort of 'communication', I destroyed them unread). The request for hospitalization by Berstad was, as far as I remember, because (or at least after) I had made him aware of a bag of white linen on the floor in the washing room: I had observed this once and thereafter one week later the same bag on the same position, after which I made him aware of it and he said "yes, that is ours". It seems (from my memory - I think there was somebody who mentioned this connection) that he could have considered my mention of this for him 'psychiatric', could be 'paranoid'. Hence there was not a legal basis for the hospitalization since the signature was not a valid reason. (I was not a danger for either myself or others). Hence it could have been called 'hostage-taking'? Would this have been relevant to the current situation in Gaza?

Some time ago I was leafing in Gardiner's 'Egyptian grammar' and came across the hieroglyph (V33) called 'bag of linen' (source) with phonetics appr. 'self-sucker' which could have been seen as inherently related to the forced hospitalization of me in 1999: The phonetics is given as sšr, ˁrf, ỉdr, g, šs - that is, sšr = 'sesher', cp. 'self-sucker'. Add the 'g' and there could be a 'seshgr', something like that. The alternative is given as šs, šsr, sšr, g // šs, ˁrf, ḥbs - hence an additional phonetics a la 'hebephrenic'? The sum total of this could in theory be seen as 'self-sucker' ('sesher' + 'g' etc) for 'hebephrenia' = 'schizophrenia'.

If so, the potential 'hostage-taking' of me in 1999 could be seen as relevant to the current situation in Gaza by way of the ancient 'Giza' pyramid - and hence the attack on Israel on 7 october 2023 could be a comparable 'gooser' - for a 'Giza-Gaza-Gooser'. That could consequently have been for the idea that the israeli problem after the attack could have been that they could not handle such an 'egyptian' origin to the story - as if judaism were inherited from the ancient egyptians.

Why could 'self-sucker' have been a relevant concept in 1999? In the 1980's (I think it was, could be after 1981?) the Grøvers gave 50.000 NOK to each of the three children. If the second father had just taken over the identity (including money) after the first father, it could be that I would have been a legal inheritor to those, according to the law. If so, my accept of these money from the Grøvers could then have been considered an act of 'self-sucking' - and it would have been so on (quasi) basis of the law - which then would have been accepted as a stronger rule than the other law which required 'regular contact' for the signature to be a valid reason for a forced hospitalization. This stronger rule would then have been by a logic according to a 'law of criminals' - since accept of money cannot really be called 'self-sucking' = 'auto-fellatio'. [Published appr. 16:49-17:10 hungarian time].

11 october 2025:

This year it really looked as if I should get the Nobel prize for literature - for my 'The Endmorgan Quartet'. The feeling disappeared around 13:00 on thursday when the name was announced. 'László Krasznahorkai' resembles norwegian 'la slukker a snorkai' = 'let quench (off) the snoring' or even 'let she quench her snore in (somebody)'. The reason was not so difficult to find - it could be in my poem 'I was taking off my wristwatch' which I wrote in probably 1993. It can be seen as a description of my way of writing just 'The Endmorgan Quartet' (1997-2008). Could be 'the invisible world' is the relevant concept.

A new earthquake at Mindanao, the Philippines yesterday: The earthquake was nearest to Prinsesa Falls, Pusan Point, Tambongon, Duay Bitaog (source this Google map). Time 01:43:59.7 could suggest 1:11:59.7 and hence 1223 cp. if JFK = US → Ie223 = Jesus? In 2002 I suffered a brainstroke on 23 february, my younger sister's birthday in 1961. The earthquake yesterday was followed by so far more than 800 aftershocks. (I dont know if these could be engineered with laser beams/bombs).

I feel a little displaced in my lower spine. It wont be as bad as in the spring 2019 when I had to walk with a stick. 'Olga Tokarczuk' in norwegian sounds like 'olga tok artium' = 'olga took the high school degree'. They probably wont take that but they took my PhD which should have been accepted in 1998. I have also fancied that this rejection could have been preplanned since I took 'artium' in 1975 and 1976.

12/10-25: As to the earthquake at 01:43:59.7 as 1:11:59.7, there is the hungarian numeral '95' = 'kilencvenöt' (pronounced 'kilentsvenöt') - I notice the last words of the first father before he left in 1969 ('nøtt' can mean 'nut' or 'nødt' = 'have/has to') - cp. also a possible '96' a year ago, likewise in circumstances of lower spine peculiarities. A countdown ends in 2120?

News tell of a helicopter crash in USA and a car crash in Egypt.

12 october 2025:

My theory on the nature of virus (see the theory outlined in smaller types here) tells that the viruses are caused by swindle in the culture - such as plagiarisms and abuse of surveillance data. Pfizer made the anti-COVID pill called 'Paxlovid' - were it on basis of my theory? - which was launched on 21 december 2021. If it were based on a plagiarism (an uncredited borrowing) of my theory, the publication of it would in itself expectedly lead to an increase in infections - and thereby also increase in the demand for the new pill - that is farmaceutic business indeed. Here is the global curve of COVID infections (source) - it is hard to find a better example. The pandemic lasted as long as 'The Dynasty' was on the TV screens.

However, even if such phenomena could increase the demand for the new pill, and it may be that business-controlled virus medication is much of this type, it is doubtful whether it is smart national and international economy - cp. the US national debt problems.

Pfizer also changed their logo in 2021 - the new one looks like a mismatch of parentheses. See also these comments on a patent for a vaccine from GeoVax allegedly against cancer - after I in 2020 had drafted on my home workdesk computer a theory of cancer caused by cultural 'parentheses mismatch'. I have made some scattered observations on this homepage about public advertisements in Vienna - huge outdoor posters possibly all over the country (could be also up in Germany?) - some of which could have seemed to reflect work I had done on my home workdesk a day or two earlier. An example is mentioned in the article 'Summary of the corona epidemic theory' concerning the advertisement for 'Billa' - which seemed to be based on my then ongoing work on my home workdesk computer - at least I cannot find that I had published those things before the ad came up. Another example could be the one mentioned in this file written under feelings of more confusion: The ad for 'Scheibekäse' seemed to be related to this 'ex nihilo' piece which I associated with the idea of 'The dog from Bangladesh' (which could have been the title of a famous novel - have you read it?). (See #47). The ad makes also mention of 'Nachhaltigkeit' - while the mentioned ad for 'Billa' seemed to relate to a 'path through fields/Mark'.

At the end of this little path between Wiener Stadhalle and the park ('Wiener Stadthalle' spoons to 'stien er VAT-halle' = 'the path is the VAT hall') there was in 2021 the story with the woman who lay dead or unconscious at the traffic lights on the other side of the zebra, just by the then coronavirus station for testing. I dont remember if there were also COVID vaccinations going on in Wiener Stadthalle. One man was massaging her biceps, it seemed, another waved his hand in the air to signal to other guards at the COVID station in the Stadthalle. I think this scene with the woman on the ground was when the concept of 'nachhaltig' came to be a business concept that seemed to expand rapidly, and it may still be around. Every business seemed to be 'nachhaltig' for a while. (It is probably this word which is used in the ad for 'Scheibekäse'). The business sense is normally probably 'preserving nature/culture', but it could also invoke associations to either 'dont touch her' or even 'the chemicals are slow to leave the body'. (Wiener Stadthalle was the location of the 'Eurovision song contest' in 2015 and now again probably also next year 2026). A bank where I had a VISA for smaller sums also started sending me a lot of forms to be filled in untill I terminated the card contract - it was about a verification code but I think also general registration questions and I did not understand the point. (The scene in the street could also appear reminiscent of the first 2-3 pages of Robert Musil: "Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften").

At the end of this file (under 28/8-2023) discussing some possible cases of abuse there is mention of an advertisement for 'Crunchips'.

In short, it appears from these examples that there could be many capitalist interests out for claiming rights to the use of my authorship. Some days ago I received a letter from a lawyer firm in Norway who represented my official mother Ragna Grøver who, they told, planned to sell the house and next year distribute the sum evenly on the three children. However, since the man who built it in 1970 used the same identity as the first father who was replaced with the new in 1969, it would probably not have been judicially obvious who were the owner of that house and hence whether it would be legal to give it away. If the worst scenario should be the case that (due to e.g. 'mismatch of parents[eses]) only I would have had an authentic identity in the family, I could in such a theoretic case potentially also be the only owner of the house, which then would have meant that I would have agreed to give away 2/3 of it. If, furthermore, this should have been a part of a '1223' in the sense of '1e2US' = 'Jesus' complex, it could in the worst case have implied an inherent give-away of rights to my authorship to interests that could be affiliated with big business in USA and other countries where there could have been plagiarisms of my intellectual properties and abuse of surveillance data from e.g. my home workdesk. For such (lentil dish?) theories and other reasons I could not agree to receive money from that sales of the house.

There seems to be something about my work which people do not understand: If I write 'my virus theory', then the readers read that 'it is my virus theory' and seem to believe that it is their virus theory and therefore feel justified in presenting it as their own. If I write 'my TEQ #1225', then a reader seems to believe that 'it is my TEQ #1225' and take it for granted that it is permitted to use it without crediting me. If, though, I write Grover's poem, then the reader likewise will think that 'this is Grover's poem' and of course it is not permitted to plagiarize or abuse it.

What is this problem? Is it only that it is hard to understand that Grover's work can be of very great importance for the human society - and therefore, if they do not try as well as they can to underestimate it, would they have to look upon Grover with glittering admiration in their eyes? Or should a work of much importance expectedly look more pompous and puffed-up than Grover's simple lines? Stop the silly nonsense and give me some better working conditions, says Grover. It is not necessary to burglar Grover's home even if they believe that it is their virus theory, for example.

Did the PhD committee believe that Grover's dissertation was theirs? Already in the first line one can read that "In this book I discuss one central hypothesis, stating the existence of a signification below the morpheme level in natural language".

I think it could be important to understand that Grover's literary and scientific work, such as e.g. Grover's virus theory, could need crediting.

Is it that Norway has abused Grover since the earliest days for making power for themselves by swapping such roles, and if Grover makes just a little progress they get nervous that this role-swap will fall off and then they do something in panic for preventing it. Is that the problem.

But it should not be necessary to avoid the natural use of the 1st person singular either. I have to reserve this right for myself. "Please put away those plans of punishing me for it".

13 october 2025:

On 12 october 2025 I waited on bicycle for red lights to change to green at MacDonald's zebra in Szolnok - somebody had broken a bottle at a traffic pole there. I understood immediately that it could be supposed to mean a 'plausible reason' for another flat tyre. This morning the back wheel of the bicycle was flat again - it seems to take some hours, though, for a pumped up tyre to go down again so it must be a very small hole - could be a narrow laser beam from some satellite? It is the third time in the course of a few weeks that this happens.

'Heimskringla' is so called from the two first words 'kringla heimsins'. Such a bicycle tyre could perhaps be called 'kringla heimsins' = "the orb of the Earth".

News tell that Liv Køltzow died on 12 october 2025.

The article tells: "She was awarded the Norwegian Critics Prize for Literature for non-fiction in 2021 for Dagbøker i utvalg 1964-2018, along with Kaja Schjerven Mollerin [no] and Hans Petter Blad [no]".

From the last lines of my "And hang under the Justcan keys" (completed, copyright registered and selfpublished in january 2012, around the time of the Costa Concordia accident):

"Charik Mariké Andreeva and Fiffig Børoks Selv were those who came in a special light on background of the books they wrote, such as 'Wie Herbst' or 'Ich sah die schöne Müllerin' or even 'Feud to Juberstehen'".

I notice the puzzling parallels:

'Wie Herbst'
'Ich sah die schöne Müllerin'
'Feud to Juberstehen' = Hans Petter Blad
= Kaja Schjerven Mollerin
= Liv Køltzow

Both Blad and Mollerin are names that probably surfaced after the millenium shift and so I have not heard about them at all - they were not known to me when I wrote the book. Køltzow is a name I know since the 1970-80's.

In january 2012 I went with train to Budapest for registering "And hang under the Justcan keys" along with a woman on a seat next to me - she removed a small handbag from the neighbouring seat when I asked if it were free - not the same handbag as the one which Gordon Brown (as it seemed to be) carried when he entered the couchette compartment where I was when travelling from Venice to Vienna in 2010. She lifted a 'leg' onto a 'ledge' and I ejaculated in the underpants - in a context which could have entailed some swift deliberation a la Kringlublaðið "some considering that unadvisable which others considered highly serviceable" (under 166. TREACHERY TOWARDS KING OLAF).

(See also comment under 16 october 2025).

14 october 2025:

Having returned from Szolnok I find in my PO Box two letters from Norway which seem to have the function of causing some alarm: 1) A letter from the health administration Helfo whereto I pay my social fees (drawn from my pension) for the european social insurance (so I am insured also in Austria and other european countries). It told that my socalled 'S1 pensioner' document has been halted: This happened when I moved from Italy to Austria in 2009. It has been halted since 2010, told the letter which was signed with a name which looked like a paraphrase on the last line in poem #23 from my 'The rose's triangle'. I was invited to appeal the decision. Would this have been supposed to mean that my own 'authorship' (so to speak) sends me a letter telling that I have lost the rights? I spent probably more than half an hour or so in the telephone trying to find out if my social insurance (the socalled S1) had been halted or if it were now in order. They could finally confirm that it is in order now for Austria, yes, so I did not have to do anything more about the letter. 2) A letter from Nordea bank telling that they need to have updated information about me. 'If you do not update the information, we will have to consider whether to reduce your access to our services'. A detailed instruction telling 'Open Nordea.no' and click 'Log in', then under 'Other services' click on 'My pages - customer information'. There was no 'Other services' there - but there were some additional links on the lefthand side. I had to telephone the bank for being told that 'My pages - customer information' was among those links even if there was no 'Other services' told explicitly - it probably meant that the links inherently constituted a sort of 'other services'. The fill-in procedure in the online form was in the form of a series of questions whether the data which they had stored on my person had been altered: Yes or no. If yes, choose among alternatives that come up. It turned out that they had wrong data stored on me - what should have been 'into the account' was on 'out of the account' and vice versa (I seriously doubt that I had given them those data - I would suspect that somebody else must have altered the information I had given), so I had to change these. There was also a question if somebody 'in the family' were in a certain kind of work - these 'sensitive' positions (member of the government etc) were listed for yes/no. There seems to be a nephew of mine in the current norwegian government - a minister of international development - but I dont have any data on him which the form seemed to require. However, the alternatives that came up seemed to include only members of the closest family (parents, spouse, children) so it was not interesting. There was also an alternative about some 'rights' (photo from the screen) which looked unclear. (In addition, it seems to contain a grammatical error - it is called 'en masse' = 'a mass', not 'et masse', at least according to my linguistic intuition). Say, if I were to establish a fund of some sort into which economic compensation for (international) plagiarisms and abuses could be payed - so that it would not help the plagiarists to murder me in order to escape the payment (which could be maybe on the order of billions of dollars) - would such a fund sort under any of these alternatives? For the time being this is not a pressing problem since no official authorities have agreed to the reality of the problem so far - but I believe there are reasons for such speculations. I concluded nevertheless that members of the norwegian government (or social links thereto) would not have rights to my resources or 'rights thereto', so it was just to tick a 'no' for this alternative as well. I tried to send the filled-in form but it responded that it was incompletely filled in and I had to look over it again and then it looked not entirely the same. I finally succeeded in having it sent and hope that the bank can continue to offer relevant services (such as my rights to take my money out etc). Since the data which the bank earlier had stored on me seemed to be inaccurate and it is not probable that I were the reason for these, it is not impossible that the combination of the two letters served to tell that things could perhaps be a little unreliable somehow - that there could be a human factor hiding somewhere behind the computer forms?

In the burglary of my house in Szolnok in 2019 a microwave oven was also stolen. I think I forgot to mention this for the police when we put up the list of stolen items. (It had been left there by the previous owner[s] of the house). However, I cannot find the police report from the burglary (which I got from them) and it is not impossible that even this could have been stolen by a new burglary (which would have left no traces, though, if there has been any such).

In 2005 or maybe 2006 the police on Simmering by Vienna told me that somebody had made a formal report against me at the police that I had been 'talking to children', which was not true: I had said a 'guten Tag' with a nod (the word is english, not hebrew) to a young girl standing outside a house looking at me with big eyes when I strode past but that was all - so clearly any such accusations or allegations would have been on a false basis. However, it is true that as long as I had contacts with my sisters in Norway (1980's mainly) I was also in contact with their children, and then I was 'talking to them', but there were never any reasons to believe that I should have done them any harm.

15/10-2025: I recall a story from childhood: For christmas it is customary in Norway to eat 'ribbe' and so did we on 1st christmas day some time in the 1960's - my elder sister suddenly got a pain in her stomach and had to lie down on the sofa. I think the parents laughed a little at her and said that she had 'overeaten' ('hadde forspist seg'). In a book (Krarup Nielsen: 'Mitt livs eventyrreise') I got from the parents in the 1960's (I dont remember which were first of these two story elements) there could be some reasons to recognize the name of my elder sister 'Vibeke Grøver' in some of the four photos at page 104 (photo 1, photo 2, photo 3, photo 4) and in particular photo 2 could also indicate a 'Ribbentrop'. This means that if the parents should have put a drop of stomach-pain-making medicine in her piece of 'ribbe', there could have been a 'ribben-drop' in the story - but then the associations to the story would have been a little chilling - as if they laughed that some 'Ribbentrop' would come and eat her. This memory or idea would seem rather farfetched (and I have little or no reason to believe that this would have been the reason for their slight amusement) not the least for the present context if it were not for the fact that the norwegian address to Nordea Bank is in 'Essendrops Gate 7' in Oslo (bottom of this page). Their main office moved to Helsinki some years ago, according to the data available to me. (I got a letter from them informing about this some years ago).

16 october 2025:

In 1982 I studied literature at the university in Oslo and was acquainted with Kjell Heggelund (later married to Liv Køltzow who died a few days ago). Herdis Eggen said that he is the type which makes one want to sit on his lap ('sitte på fanget'). There was no insinuation about 'soul below' in the comment.

20 october 2025:

I believed there were now consensus on fading me out of public abuse but discuss in the file 'Some words on advertisement in Vienna' some examples that could suggest that the new consensus is not necessarily introduced all over. I had hoped to be able to leave this sort of 'studies' behind.

Some comments on what could be a rather important document for understanding the history: 'Kringlublaðið'.

Evening: I made also this little study today - it seems to solve the riddle about Eliot which I mentioned in the article on 'Kringlublaðið'.

22 october 2025:

Some further data about 'the octogon' - here relative to the question whether Jimi Hendrix could have been assigned a role in the story.

26 october 2025:

Returning from Szolnok on 13 october 2025 I found (as described on 14 october) in my PO Box two letters from Norway:

1) From the state social insurance Helfo who said that my social insurance in Italy expired in 2010.

2) A letter from Nordea bank asking me to confirm or correct data registered at them.

About a week later I received also two emails:

3) An email of 19 october 2025 from Erste Bank with 'marketing' news: "Sehr geehrter Herr Grover, wussten Sie, dass Sie in der Erste Bank und Sparkasse das tägliche Bankgeschäft auch ohne Filialbesuch erledigen können?" In 2021 the bank deleted a savings account I had by them because I had not answered a letter in time (I had then been in Italy).

4) An email of 20 october 2025 from 'One' (formerly 'Vodafone') with whom I have an internet connection in Szolnok and a telephone connection that functions in but seemingly not out: They wrote that the annual 'data reconciliation' (updating of registration data) must be done before january and I was prompted to respond electronically right away. I so did but their electronic form would not behave: When I wrote the '@' of my email address the screen showed a '?' and it could not be solved. The data had to be correct. I gave it up but tried again a little later - then the screen showed the correct data and I tried to press the 'SEND' button but it would not function. The message was that I could also contact them personally in one of their offices. To get this finished I therefore went to Győr on 24 october 2025 for having it done in their office there - but no sooner had I arrived and tried to find out of the queue numbering, a person came up and asked what it was about and I explained that it was about the data registration confirmation. "Nem müködik a rendszer" = 'the system doesnt function' she said. I could not take that seriously - a telecom firm must have a functioning network - so I took a queue number and went to one of the customer advicers and explained it. She asked for my SIM card and looked at the screen and then suddenly expressed the same "nem müködik a rendszer" - and on my repeated attempts to explain the problem she only repeated this. They could not help me with the registration or even receive the data since the system didnt function. I had to try again in january. I left but returned again to have it confirmed that it was their system that didnt function (not mine), which they confirmed. I had also planned to go to the bank for some details while I was in Győr but it was closed on fridays, strangely enough (it is not because norwegian 'fridag' = 'holiday', 'day off'?), and I had to return to Vienna without having obtained anything.

I dont know if the four letters - two by post from Norway and two by email from Austria-Hungary - could perhaps be seen to constitute a coordinate system of north-south (= Nordea, Italian social insurance) plus west-east ('Erste Bank' → 'bers stank' = 'smell of excrements' vs 'vann' = 'water' = the issues in the front). A swastika on the map of Europe? Van Sea?

(I hope it is not that somebody has spied on my ongoing work and want to 'partake' in it).

Today the electronic form (for doing the 'data reconciliation' online) is still dysfunctional, and I tried to use the chat option for solving this 'data reconciliation' electronically but I gave up after waiting too long for an administrator. (I have had a cough today).

The ONE office in Szolnok is in a 'Plaza' shopping centre - an office there just visavis 'T mobile' and next to 'Yettel' which are alleged telecom competitors. I have speculated if the reduction from 'Vodafone' to 'One' (I think they changed name in the beginning of this year) could have included a function on my name 'John' vs the name of my younger sister 'Tone' - there is the 'T mobile' which could enter into 'merger' (as it is spelt and pronounced) with 'One'. The 'Yettel' was formerly the norwegian telecom firm 'Telenor', and 'Elenor' resembles the hungarian 'ellenőr' which means 'inspector' (strictly speaking it means a 'counter-guard').

What did they mean with 'the system doesnt function'? The email said that 'according to the law' I was obliged to do the 'data reconciliation' - but when I travel all the way to Győr for doing it, they answer that the system doesnt function? What do they mean?

It was on the way home with the train that I made the photo of the 'diadem'. 'Elenor' and 'ellenőr', 'hohnet' (norwegian 'hånet') and 'höhnet'. I naturally speculated if the 'diadem' would have been an ex nihilo formation.

Ex nihilo formation probably cannot occur if you lie or swindle or plagiarize - that is, 'do the same' without crediting the source.

The one who has the quickest computer wins the war. If it be true that Russia does not lie or swindle or plagiarize, at least not to the extent that they seem to do in the west, it may be that the west is nervous.

28 october 2025:

Some considerations on what could perhaps be called 'the norwegian problem'.

29 october 2025:

On 2 october 2025 at 1:11 PM an email came from Ragna Grøver's lawyer in Fredrikstad telling that I could get a pre-inheritance of 1/3 from the sales of her house in Fredrikstad. The money would be sent on 15 february next year, so he needed my bank details. I wrote back the next day at 1:25 PM that it would not be smart to receive such a gift from Ragna Grøver, not the least since I knew not the identity of the man who took the role of the official father in 1969 and hence probably was the official owner of the house built in 1970-71. Yesterday 28 october there came another email at 1:28 PM - a second attempt to get the money through. The name of the lawyer could associate with 'fool-law'. My novel 'The Dreamer' for 28 october 1994 tells of a taxi with a voice telling 'there goes that fool again'. The mid poem TEQ #860 in my 'The Endmorgan Quartet' has the parallel text from Acts 10:13 telling of a voice saying θῦσον καὶ φάγε = 'thuson & fage' which spoons to 'fuson & thage'. Would this have been the 'taxi' with the inner voice? Then what is the 'fy-son'? I recall a sketch on norwegian radio with Harald Heide-Steen and Toto Osvold about a bathing guard from a geysir or a hotwater spring on Iceland. I believe I recall that there was mention of the icelandic skald 'Robert Fison' who had telephone number '53' - but in the reproduction on the internet now this name has - if I remember right - been changed into 'Gudmund Fison', icelandic poet, at 4:24. The number is mentioned at 3:30 - 'Gudmundur, telephone 53'. It was not after I had written this poem in a hostel in Venice in 2015 that I went out into the corridor and believed I saw Robert Huez in the other end of the corridor, apparently assisting a cleaning woman with washing the floor - if I were not mistaken somehow. Slovak PM Robert Fico was subjected to an assassination attempt in may last year. By the email time points 1:11 = 'to throw the clothes off', 1:25 = 'varmt' = 'hot', 1:28 = 'hjertet' = 'the heart'. Norwegian 'fugl' (pronounced like 'fool') = 'bird'. (Russia has recently tested its new 'Burevestnik' nuclear missile - that is the name of the bird 'stormy petrel'). In Acts chapter 10, Peter sees a sort of great sheet being lowered from heaven, with all sorts of animals thereupon. This happened three times. My mood was not so good and I got a strangely 'electronic' voice yesterday and this morning which I believed could have been from a cold. (I hope there wont come a third attempt - then I would start feeling rather stalked - as if they try to get the money from Ragna Grøver in). Yesterday I published this article in the evening but had then not noticed the email from the norwegian lawyer - I found this email today. In yesterday's article I mentioned the 'tax year': 'Thorax' is the cage of the ribs - cp. also 'fiskeribølgen' = the fishermen's radio wavelength wherein they used to communicate fish catches in former days (in order to stay within the fishing quotas, I think was the reason).

The world probably owes me a lot of money from abuses of my authorship.

I believe there are some reasons (this and this) to assume that there could have been a potentially rather heavy child abuse of me under Ragna Grøver's custody, and also that it could have been on behalf of the norwegian state (therapist Mentzen informed me that the parents were 'dependent'). Then of course one cannot expect that I should accept a 'gift' from her - at least not before the responsibles have tidied up.

31 october 2025:

My reply email to Ragna Grøver's lawyer in Fredrikstad is given here.

TEQ #112 could be the story. It was on the front page of my homepage through some years. 'Keys' and 'yale' does not mean 'plums' and 'anorak'. The parallel text is from Luke 24:46. Could be the norwegians had hoped to gain a feeling of authority to my homepage?

It is all-important to credit the source. It is I who have written 'The Endmorgan Quartet', not them. Dangerous fanatism must be avoided. That is done by crediting the source. Plagiarisms are dangerous illusions. If plagiarisms of my works feel well and right in USA - is that because Mr.Grover has zero debt?

* * *