Brief comments

Brief comments

John Bjarne Grover

Most recent entries first. For brief comments for earlier months see the end of this file

1 may 2025:

In the bank two days ago, the sounds from the bank machine told that the printout had been printed but it did not come up in the slit. The second time, with the employee next to it, the same happened but then the paper came up. It means that the first printouts were stored somewhere in the machine. When I yesterday saw the envelope from the bank in the postbox, I thought: Ah, yes, they have sent to me the paper printouts which they found later in the day when they opened the machine - that was nice of them since it would have returned to me the failed first attempt and hence also the failed first attempt to get the european health insurance card concerning the 'reisetariffs' of health insurance. When I opened the letter, it turned out to be the very opposite. That was disappointing. They could have returned to me those failed printouts and then maybe even the lost poetry notebook story could have been somewhat healed. That would have been good banking.

Not the least, perhaps, because of this story. [2/5-25: I.e., Ivana Trump's death in july 2022 which seems to have been due to a fall down some stairs in her home, apparently quite similar to Resetarits some weeks earlier, in april 2022. Of course humans will tend to speculate on reasons for a fall - which typically is about the law of gravity which concerns bodies - cp. also the 'Reisetariffs' on bodies crossing the US borders for the time being. The word 'steep' may be etymologically the same as 'stoop'. Were there any problems? What falls down? But it is not so easy to repair a falldown by doing the oppo-site afterwards. 'Anke' is to 'complain/appeal'. etymologically from 'ank' = 'to regret'. 'A tim of logic' vs 'a till of logic'? Tik tok].

[3/5-25: It is perhaps not normal to be explicit on the theme but I think such laser beams exist which can put a person's field of attention and concentration out of order for a brief moment - enough to make you stumble (and lose your balance, as it is called). I saw that once in Venice - I should cross a bridge over a canal when a man stood there looking at me and pointing up into heaven, as for a satellite. As I should go back again from the other side there were 3-4 people walking in front of me when one of them stumbled and fell to the ground - she got up again and looked somewhat irritated and a little troubled (what should have been the reason for such a fall?) and it was not theatre before my eyes. Could be she had been hit by such a beam? It was not my presence that had done it. The phenomenon could be known also to e.g. fast and competitive slalom skiiers who do not want to have audience with such beams in the bag. Of course Ivana Trump as well as Resetarits and Freire could have suffered such beams].

2 may 2025:

I went to the bank today and got it confirmed that the chance to install 'George' does not expire in july. The letter had been articulated in an unfortunate or peculiar way, as far as I understood. The bank offered me a plastic cover to my bank card for protecting the magnetic stripe against rubs. (A week ago or so I had in fact thought that I needed just that).

There were several coincidences on the way to and from the bank, including a bag, a personal association or two to 'Strobel-gasse'(?), the idea of a painter etc. On my arrival from abroad a few days ago there were three bags on the street outside the nearby mosque, while the last time before that when I arrived from abroad three men seemed to be heading for the mosque with some slight relevance for my person. Of course that could have been a coincidence. There are many coincidences I could tell of - it is not fair play if these are organized while I cannot tell these 'coincidenes' here on the internet because people have the right to behave normally in the street (putting on a white hat and stepping into a car, for example) without this being reported by me on the internet. I suppose the bank did not announce 'strouble' on basis of cognitive surveillance. It is a mistake to believe that 'coincidences' can be organized and look normal and innocent - such meaningful coincidences are in fact quite tiring.

3 may 2025:

On 1 april 2025 I tried to buy a ticket for the concert yesterday, but, as seen, it was sold out, told the computer. The bank recently informed me that the 's-Identity' system for verifying an internet payment can be used only on the computer where the program is installed - the system recognizes the computer.

Should it mean 'Erste B-ank' s-IDentity = 'er steep id [of me]' - on behalf of the ticketseller?

The problem of plagiarisms on my literary and scientific works resembles the european invasion of the indians' America. There are talks in the european towns and villages that a new continent has opened up and there are lands and possibilities for everybody who need it. You just go over there with a boat and find a site for your house and build it and soon you are up and going with money - a world of prosperity compared with the grey and murky life of the european countries. Having arrived there you need to have a gun in your belt all the time against the indians who are a problem, even worse than the mosquitoes, but the land is so far free for everybody. Those who have gone there are building a new world of freedom and prosperity for everybody.

Is that right and just?

It is just to fish down some piece of text or image from Grover's web page and start the business, and soon you are rich. Only watch out in case this Grover should come around, but that is normally no problem.

It has been said so many times that the invasion of America is a problem which is hard to solve. But that is not a reason for allowing for unhindered plagiarisms of my work.

It is such a grey and gloomy world that old Europe - because Hitler couped Lenin and Jesus. But now a new continent has opened up - which gives us hope and inspiration.

I would have needed money to get away from the plagiarists - instead of hanging around for agreeing to the spiritual rapes of my work which they constitute. Children who are raped are not much injured in their bodies - they look okey dont they? - unless the rape was 'badly done'? 'It is not badly done!' they say perhaps, with some indignation in their voices.

With this article of mine, I should get the PhD in the post (without applying for it) - so that I can have it behind glass on the wall.

I quote from the concluding remarks of my article on Aristotle - the five important corollaries which are far from trivial and which lead to "a restructuring of the conception of Aristotle which could constitute a paradigmatic change in the conception of prechristian philosophy generally". That is no small matter! It can reinterpret the basis even for christian theology - instead of leaving that to Adolf Hitler. It is seen that the five non-trivial conclusions or corollaries (i-v) I have reached correspond with rather much precision to the five parts (books 1-5) of my PhD dissertation - which thereby served to prepare for this discovery of a reinterpretation of Aristotle. A 'paradigmatic change' is no small matter. I have worked constantly since then with this and some recognition is needed instead of agreeing to the massive continent of plagiarisms that has been accumulated in the mean time. Large amounts of refugees probably still go out in their boats on a daily basis and refer to a legitimate human rights basis for an asylum in Jombjarnaland. The Oklahoma bombing (the 'worst' in US history) and the Columbine high school massacre seem to have been for an institutional 'rape' of books 1 and 2 of my PhD dissertation. They were not badly done?

Were my PhD rejected because I did not agree to scientific supervision (as if that could have been a reason)? I could of course not have reached the basis for a paradigmatic change under supervision. Neither could I have worked well if I were forced to teach an audience from a public in a state which could have been involved in organizing heavy child abuse of me. The 'fakultet stipend' included such obligatory teaching - but in Bergen I applied for being relieved of that and got that exception - although with a reduction from 4 to 3 years of the stipend. There are some reasons to believe that there could have been such heavy child abuse of me.

I cannot take up a loan in a bank and I cannot apply for anything. So I should expect to get the PhD in the post - it is too late to use it for anything but a piece of paper up in the slit behind the glass and the frame is something nevertheless.

The police must start arresting the bandits instead of listening to their white-christmas-in-Jombjarnaland talk.

4 may 2025:

A short discussion today: "Is Sebastian Fitzek's 'Die Einladung' (2024) a plagiarism of my 'Der Dornenstrauch' (2015)?" I present some pages from the beginning and end of Fitzek's novel for comparison with my book. In light of the phenomenon discussed in this article, whereby it could look as if COVID (perhaps not coincidentally?) lasted as long as 'The Dynasty' did on TV, it could be that a potential relevance of my book for Fitzek's could be worth some attention.

The big mystery is t his: Why doesnt the politicians come out with the entire story?

5 may 2025:

Added some further comments to yesterday's discussion.

7 may 2025:

On 22 november 1999 (Kennedy assassination day) I was driven to forced pyschiatric treatment in Bergen. I wrote on 25 november to the king and and hoped for help to be let out again. I got a letter (written in english) from his secretary telling that my request had been forwarded to the control committee at the hospital. The letter was dated 29 june 1999, which was my birthday but it referred to my letter of 25 november that year. I am born on 29 june 1957. I was released from the hospital I think on 14 january 2000 - since the control committee has a meeting not so often and I think I missed the first.

There was no goodenough reason for the forced treatment which had been made on basis of the signature of the official mother Ragna Grøver. It was not long after I had sent the letter (did I send it on 26 november?) to the king that the catamaran 'Sleipner' went aground on Bloksa or Store Bloksen at Ryvarden lighthouse and it sank and many people died.

Before I fled from the country in february, I applied also for a disability pension and handed in the papers at "Bergen Trygdekontor - Sentrum". I have found the reply letter from them telling that the handling of the application would take some time. It is dated 3 january 2000 and refers to the reception of my application of 30 december 1999. I remember that I was there and gave them the papers but I would have believed that it was after I had been released. I had (as far as I remember) 2 (or was it 3?) hours leave from the hospital every day and could have been there in that break but I think it used to be not so early on the day that I could leave the hospital. But I should probably guess that it is the real letter I have. I could have guessed that the background of the spam mails I received on 6 and 9 april 2024 could have contained a reference to the name of the one who sent the letter from "Bergen Trygdekontor - Sentrum", which would have created an 'H'. The first battle of Mount Hermon in the Yom Kippur war included israeli commander 'Amir Drori' - which could have been taken as a reference on the form 'å myrde rori' - I had got the boys' book 'Den ensomme rytter' = 'The lonely rider' in the 1960's - which could have been this 'raw ride' but it would also have been possible to put in a 'B' for 'å mirde brori' = 'to mirder your brother' (Kennedy?). 'BH' means a 'bra', possibly my PhD.

There were two cases of terror in France recently that both were in the form of stabbing with knife 57 times of a victim - the first was in Nantes and the second was in La Grand-Combe coindexing the 'Khumbutse' complex in this recent article of mine. It is possible that this incredible coincidence of '57' could have served to tell my birthyear on basis of the letter from the royal castle in Oslo in 1999. What calls for attention is the name of the victim (from Mali) called 'Aboubakar Cissé' in the mosque of La Grand-Combe - by that 'buba' in the poem TEQ #1035. How could they find a victim with such a name in a place with such a name - in that reference to the article I had published on 11 april 2025? The purpose with such a name could have been to pretend that the Khumbutse relation to my white stone were known long before the 'potato balls' which also can be called 'kumpe' were introduced in the family menu in Volda in 1964 and again in 1970 or 1971. The idea would have been that this Khumbutse were the reason for the potato balls - and so my article would have been little new to the organizers of the intrigue. But that is probably not the case. But how could they have found such a name in such a small place - which even has a mosque? My guess is that soon after I had published the article on 11 april 2025, an intelligence computer could have compared the data with all sorts of intelligence data and registers in all countries and found this name in that place - and this would have been the reason for the attack on Cissé - while the attack on the school in Nantes would have been for making the number '57' the essential newspiece. The effect would have created the impression that the Khumbutse complex was known to the organizers of the intrigue since long ago.

Why should that have been interesting? It could have been because my article can be sufficiently important to make it impossible to continue the propaganda claiming that all my work is 'worthless excrement'. The forced hospitalization in 1999 could have been for this program after my PhD had been rejected.

It is noticed that this explanation to the terror in France could imply a certain prominence to the role of my poem TEQ #1035 (with that 'buba') on the background explained in this file of the role of TEQ #874: It is that 'Lucifer bag' which could contain a reference to the assumed Brown with oldfashioned leathern doctor bag on the train in 2010 on (as far as I remember - and I think that appeared essential rather early) the day of the tragic earthquake of Port-au-Prince on Haiti. This complex could have been a play on ideas of humans and divines.

It is seen that TEQ #873 also could have been a reference to the concert that was sold out. The pre-sales to this started (as far as I remember) for members on 3 march - it seems that the day of the first foot-and-mouth at Levél (means 'letter') in Hungary was confirmed 4 days later, on 7 march.

Would the foot-and-mouth have been the same phenomenon as COVID? A plagiarism not on TV this time but maybe on BH - that could have meant 'Fenstad' (who rejected my PhD) as for the hungarian fence law.

It is of course a burden to my poetry that it be used for indexing.

* * *

My theory is that the entire history with Hitler and me and all that - could be even since the reformation - is all about that gap to the original Aristotle which I have described in this article. Since I show in the concluding remarks that the most important aspects were contained even in the PhD dissertation, it is likely that this also would have been the background of the story with the forced psychiatric hospitalization in 1999. This schism from received Aristotle-related theology since the middle ages through the dawning discovery of 'something else' therein by the renaissance would have been the origin of the protestantism and the conflict thereby which created the cultural space of Europe since then.

What was the essence of lutheranism? I quote two passages from this Wikipedia file on Martin Luther:

Quote #1: "Luther taught that justification and, consequently, salvation and eternal life, is not earned by any human acts or intents or merit; rather, they are received only as the free gift of God's grace through the believer's faith in Jesus Christ".

This means: Truth is by faculty of faith, i.e. like the information flux from eternity into history, not contrasting a falsehood or 'hell' that necessarily has to accompany the alternative solution. This means that Lutheranism would be based on an intuition of the fundamental theorem of logic. However, the problem calling for solutions would not be in terms of avoiding the necessary presence of a 'hell' but by realizing the impossibility of equiprobability in history.

Quote #2: "Luther's theology challenged the authority and office of the pope and bishops by teaching that the Bible is the only source of divinely revealed knowledge on the Gospel, and opposed sacerdotalism by considering all baptized Christians to be a holy priesthood".

This means: The 'semantic' solution to the problem of necessary non-equiprobability is found by shifting the equiprobability from ('clerical') occurrence to 'equi-importance'.

This means that lutheranism opposing catholicism plant their flag in the semantic solution and leave the alternative, the syntactic solution, to catholicism. The syntactic solution by categorization adding probabilities up to more or less than unity would thereby be left to catholicism.

However, since this syntactic categorization is the authentic Aristotle (of the submorphemic reality) in contrast to the medievally received Aristotle, and since protestantism developed in contrast to the received catholicism, a puzzling paradox arose which turned protestantism into a sort of Don Quichottes battling the featural windmills which were the basis for their holy struggle. Could be that paradox was because they protested on basis of the faculty of faith qua absence of negations/protests. Hence if quote 1 tells of a branching sentence node S, quote 2 would tell of a noun node N and these in combination would challenge the catholic verb node V. Since the whole construction also is syntactic, they felt that there were no need for catholicism any longer. It would have been this intrigueing construction claiming to be the authentic Aristotle that catholicism conceived as the dirty beast in the revelation arising from a faulty (or 'dirty') image of Aristotle in the mirror point around the birth of Christ.

This is what later gave rise to nazism that couped Jesus via Fatima and the challenge on the russian revolution. The whole problem of nazism will dissolve with the recognition of the authentic Aristotle.

Clearly it could have been this threat against a choice that could have been made in Norway that were the reason for the forced hospitalization of me in 1999.

And now for the essential conclusion: I am not the Jesus here - it is not necessary to sacrifice me like the protestants could have felt that there were no need for catholicism (or italian renaissance) any longer. I am only pointing to the logical corollaries that arise from the new theoretic concept of information that marks the opening to a new episteme. Oldfashioned ideas about a Jesus to be sacrificed for making this function is only backwaterish reactionism.

But even if I now should have solved this very essential problem, it is likely that my work will count as 'worthless excrements' anyhow - because that is how it is in Norway. ("That is his role here"). That is also why I applied for a political asylum in 2002. And that could have been the background of these unfortunate stabbings in France recently - could be because of a norwegian panic that my work could come to look like not only 'worthless excrements'. But why then continue with those norwegians? Ah, yes, that is why I applied for an asylum. The norwegians probably sit on my authority and the world speaks with them and believe they speak with me.

Look at those apparent plagiarisms, for example. How on earth can it be understood that those are allowed to continue? It ends in world war - and they are still allowed to continue?

9 may 2025:

On 7 may 2025 I outlined a theory on the dispute between catholicism and the protestantism that arose approximately half way through the millenium. This model of understanding is based on the role of the fundamental theorem of logic and its echo in the apparent abstractionism that can be shown to exist in the philosophy of Aristotle as seen from the 'submorphemic' episteme which I believe that the prechristian millenium constituted. The basic idea is that protestantism came to take a 'semantic' standpoint against the 'syntactic' function they thereby assigned to catholicism. This is most clearly visible in the fundamental difference in the conception of the eucharist.

But semantics is also the essential theme of the fundamental theorem of linguistics - telling that 'two and only two items can be the same across different realities'. This defines the basis for the faculty of language in humans - and it is based on the assumption that when two items are 'the same' across different realities, that means that this is how the humans conceive of them. It also means that since they are two they are in a larger reality not the same but on the contrary they can be quite different - even if humans cannot understand this.

The basic idea is that it is the human limitations in understanding that conceives of the two different items as 'the same' and this attaches the one to the other and lends them an inertia which turns into gravity and the single ontological item is created thereby. This conversion from metaphysics to physics (when the two metaphysical x's convert into one physical y and its physical signifier in the immant arbitrarity 2) is attached to a semantic value which in principle is assumed to take care of the original difference between them - even if that remains a speculative hypothesis - unless the 'Word' thereby assigned is of divine origin (assigned by divine authority). It is the human faculty of faith which can dissolve the attachment between the two conflated items that originally were metaphysically different - and thereby also the gravitation that results from the conflation. Hence levitation has sometimes been reported from monasterial life. I think this was reported also about Theresa of Avila.

In periods of transition between two (assumed to be 'millenial') epistemes, the scope of formalization of the linguistic knowledge expands to typically a new form of information technology - in our time the computer - which also means that the evaluation of the original differences (between the two metaphysical 'items') can come to be re-conceived. This corresponds to what I in my study of child language has recognized as a period of 'attachment' - see the pages 82-85 = "The submorphemic sign reconsidered" (which I have referred to earlier) - for the child's period of irregularity in signification. Attachment to caretaker guides the transition from a lower to a higher level of signification (as a correlate to the transition from a submorphemic to a morphemic episteme at the time of Christ) for a child - because a full overview of the original differences between the two 'items' that are considered 'the same' in linguistic competence is not possible.

This means, though, that the essential question for the transition between the two epistemes is the order between the two metaphysical items - the two x's - one of them is attached to a 'z' while the other is not, which only means that they are different and then the problem is how to distinguish them even if humans are normally not able to do that. This question concerns therefore the problem of establishing a new 'syntax' between items which formerly appeared metaphysically identical. Hence by protestantism this new 'syntax' (including the problems of attachment) would be recognized as a typically 'catholic' matter - while protestantism assigns to itself the semantic relation between the two y's - for which the relation to the 'z' remains out of reach for rationality but can be subjected to the simple faith recognized as potentially 'the same' (in the sense of relevance) for all humans, as tells protestantism. (It is noticed how this principle resembles the semantic solution for the theorem of logic).

Put differently, while formerly the two x's were attached to each other due to human limitations, in the transition to a new episteme the attachment is tentatively moved onto a higher knowledge which thereby makes it possible to detach the two x's from each other. For a believer it will typically be the faculty of faith that moves the attachment that was between the two x's onto a higher religious authority.

This could explain also the phenomenon of re-interpretation of 'attachments' in social life generally around the time of such a transition between two epistemes - socially recognizable also in the phenomenon of 'secret agency' in administration whereby agency tells of the attachment and the secrecy tells that this is out of reach for human rationality. It is likely to be about a more or less illusory attempt to get the transcendent 'unknown' under control - while at the same time pretending an administrative mastering of the transcendent metaphysics which normally is assumed to be beyond human reality. (This administrative unit will thereby apparently assign to itself a quasi divine status and hope for social sanction on that via the confusion inherent in the secrecy).

It is mysticism which works with dissolving the attachment between the conflated metaphysical items, and mystic reality is not under administrative control.

The components in the electronic computer gets smaller and smaller and soon they will reach molecular level and maybe even become subatomic. Could be there also exists an upper level of computational complexity beyond which more complexity will only slow down the machine. One could fancy that when this upper level is reached, the size and form of the ultimate computer will come to resemble a human brain. Could be there are 80 billion supercomputers in a normal human brain. Then what will be the difference relative to our brains? Could be the difference will be not so big but mainly be a matter of formalization of a certain kind of knowledge representing the step from one episteme to the next - could be they will come to understand a little more of the difference between the two x's on that level of signification - which means that the new humans will live in a somehat different reality.

Pope John Paul II declared more saints than had been done in the entire history of the catholic church before him. Does this mean that there had come to be an inflation in holiness of the saints and thereby also in the status of the catholic understanding? Not necessarily, tells this analysis - since it is possible that the transition from one episteme or information technology to the next can be essentially concerned with the status and problems of attachment.

What this means is that even if some intelligence organization should manage to get an agent into the papal chair in the times around a millenial shift, something which of course would be extremely unfortunate and should not happen, such an attempt to compromise the institutions of the church (such as the sainthood) will not necessary result in a serious loss of the church's integrity. Rather one would think that the protestantism could feel confused by the loss of certainty and therefore grabs towards catholicism for solving this problem of faith when it comes to sort the order of the two x's. This does not mean that an agent should be allowed there, anymore than anywhere else in society, but it means that the special character of the institutions of faith should be solid. Which perhaps also means that a millenial shift suggests that splits in christianity regrets it and really needs to be one christianity for solving the problems.

11/5-25: I wrote: "...such an attempt to compromise the institutions of the church (such as the sainthood) will not necessary result in a serious loss of the church's integrity". Isnt this a printing error - which should have been 'the attempt will not necessarily result in...'? If 'will' is a main verb and not a modal, it means that 'the attempt wants/will a not necessary result in...'. Could be this ambiguity is the trick of the intrigue - I therefore left the 'error' as it was even if I noticed it because of the high explanatory value it could have for understanding the diachronic aspects of this story - the attempted role-turning at the turn of the millenium.

10 may 2025:

Knut Hermundstad Aukrust was married to my elder sister Vibeke Grøver Aukrust from I think about 1981 or so and up to probably around 2009-2010. (They spent a year in Chicago). At some occasion (I think a birthday of mine around perhaps 1984 or so?) I got from them (or was it from him?) the book Hans E.Kinck: 'Foraaret i Mikropolis'. Kinck was a contemporary and friend of Knut Hamsun (born Knut Pedersen).

Petter Enok Skau Jakobsen had acquired a socalled 'Commodore' computer in the early days of the publically available computers, I think around 1983, and it could be programmed to play simple melodies. I borrowed it for a few days in 1983 or 1984, I think it was, and programmed a short melody which I believed I made on the spot but which probably was an old schläger or maybe a part of a presentation intro for a TV series. Did I tell that I had made it myself when I returned the computer? [11/5-25: I called the computer file 'micro'. PESJ said his chin/jaw fell down ('haken falt ned på brystkassen' = 'the jaw/chin fell down on the chest' or something like that - and had it been soft it could have been a 'gynecomasty' - 'sucked from own breast' is a norwegian expression for 'having made it oneself', that is, it is not a plagiarism) - the word 'jaw-dropping' seems to be from about 1900 but 'jaw-dropper' seems to be from 1984].

Knut Aukrust helped me move out from (I dont think it was into) my studio flat (in a private house) in Kornmovegen at Tårnåsen on Kolbotn in 1986 [11/5-25: probably not long after the Palme assassination, or was it about the same time?]. While we were busy with this, Petter Enok Skau Jakobsen called and told that he was going to marry and asked if I would be his 'best man'. I said no. [11/5-25: See also this file with ideas that Petter Enok Skau Jakobsen, whom I knew from 1973, could have been a name in the context of the Kennedy assassination - in which case he also could have been associated with the idea of my first father, before that one was replaced with a new one in 1969].

Knut Aukrust worked later at the university with studies in church history. I dont think I have been in contact with him since 1993 or thereabout. I met also on an occasion Knut Aukrust's father who probably was Tor Aukrust.

The first public statement by Pietro Parolin, Vatican Secretary of State, after the Conclave:

"I believe I am not revealing any secrets if I write that a very long and warm applause followed that acceptance that made him the 267th Pope of the Catholic Church. What struck me most about him was the serenity that shone on his face in such intense and, in a certain sense, "dramatic" moments, because they completely change a man's life", wrote Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State of the Vatican, in a letter to the Giornale di Vicenza, "still "fresh" - he writes - from the strong and engaging experience of the Conclave" (translation by Google translator).

It is probably possible to read this "serenity that shone on his face in such intense and, in a certain sense, 'dramatic' moments" as 'mi[n] kropp av lys' (= 'my body of light') = 'Mikropolis'. 'Få roret' = 'give me the rudder'.

Just in case the new pope (Robert Francis Prevost from Chicago, later bishop of Chiclayo) should happen to be Knut Hermundstad Aukrust, it would probably have to be an agent - which of course would be very unfortunate for me. An agent as pope in the Vatican is of course not permitted. The idea would normally be considered farfetched (and I have not any reasons to suspect that Aukrust should have been an agent) but in case the ideas of historic persons behind the facades of other parts of my family background should happen to have any reality, it could be relevant to mention this idea as well. I have suspected that if there should have been historic persons behind the facades of my family background, the role they would have tried to assign to me would have been a PTRSIM PIK qua 'technical Messiah' in the Stammbaum for the construction of a new quasi religion with 'nazi madonna' and those ideas. I am not involved in any such intrigues at all. The new pope's first words to the people in his 'Urbi et Orbi' was "La pace sia con tutti voi!". A 'dental/velar' rewrite could have alluded to my leftsided gynecomasty. I notice also the 'Tik-Tok' ado.

Here is italian PM Giorgia Meloni's open letter to the newly elected pope.

11/5-25: I have speculated if the socalled 'lapis philosophorum' which I made by the completion of my 'Der Dornenstrauch' part 3 in 2014 (speculating if this stone could have a universal status known also from art history) could have been a background of the role of the name of L.Ron Hubbard. It would have been the role of 'the naked person' (this) seen at the 'cheek of the eagle/sheep' that could have suggested such ideas.

I considered Knut Aukrust a friendly and serious person.

If I said about the melody I had programmed on the 'Commodore' computer that I had made it myself, while I had heard it on TV (maybe a comedy series about some agents), it would perhaps have been considered a plagiarism. Or would it have been me who suggested that there were plagiarisms around? It was in 1970 or the spring 1971 that I should make some work at home for the school and copied some drawings from a book about dinosaurs called 'Fortiden frem i dagen' = 'the past (revealed) into the present day', and I called the work 'Fortiden frem i dagen' without crediting the source. But if this was in 1970, it was not long after the father had been replaced with a copy and I could not tell it when the mother pretended that she did not notice the difference. But that cannot be a reason for making plagiarisms of my works. Would 'Microsoft' be a name referring to this story?

11 may 2025:

Of course agents are generally totally unacceptable. Agents are swindlers and one cannot accept swindlers under any circumstances. In particular within a church it is not possible to accept agents.

It may be that there has been a crisis in the world since WWII and that this is connected with the problems of change in knowledge with the computer age. The crisis can be that the truth of the postwar Hitler has not been told. Were Hitler an agent for England and after a 'zweite Reich' in Norway planned to return to England for a 'dritte Reich' there?

There is one single phenomenon which holds this whole story, if the truth of Hitler has not yet been told - that is in the 'expeditions to the moon' in 1969-71, when american 'pioneers' 5 out of 6 times succeeded in landing on the moon and returning safely to earth. Those 'Jules Verne' stories are probably not true - since it even today is difficult or still impossible to do it safely, and computers in those days were big and clumsy and could not be on board such a moonship. It is probably a Big Lie constructed for being just that - for telling to the world that 'there is a big lie in this world which we cannot tell before some time has elapsed'. What was that? Probably all this Hitler thing under the surface - is my interpretation. The expeditions to the moon started around the time when the first father was replaced with the second - whose identity (which he never told) I have speculated (on a weak basis, though) could have been Adolf Hitler. The catholic church is 1,4 billion believers whose confidence rests in the Vatican and of course a secret intelligence involved in such hitlerish power intrigues cannot have avoided observing just that. The reason for the whole thing is probably just that transition to the new information technology - through a period of 'significational irregularity' wherein 'attachment irregularities' comes to be an expression of the transition. So what is the solution? The expeditions to the moon probably means that it must be possible to return to truth once again - and therefore secret agency can never be accepted anyhow, even if it can be difficult to get around the problem for a transitional period of time. It may be that this transitional period is soon over. The world's leaders must come together and plan how to publish the whole story in full truth even if some countries would dislike it strongly. It must not be accepted that 'Hitler has already become the backbone of the political world and we cannot change that now'. Hitler is probably only an expression of the gap between the morphemic and the submorphemic understanding of Aristotle - and this can now be bridged and there will be no need for Hitler to fill in that gap where Christ traditionally is found.

What is the role assigned to me in this story? It is apparently only that of being not successful - so that Hitler in his 'dritte Reich' (as PTRSIM PIK related quasi 'Messiah') would make the progress which I have not made. Many of my friends from schooldays and studies have become professors and rectors while I landed in the ditch in Paris before I became a disability pensioner. Therefore it is not right to suppress my work - since that only leads to new Hitler as wolf in granny's clothing - looking like a Messiah but potentially being rather the opposite under the surface, behind the facade.

A part if this function as 'not successful' includes the rather complete flattening out of all my works through plagiarisms and insults against my copyright. Yesterday before noon I was working with some aspects of this article, such as this photo with explanatory value also for the 'snub' of this comment on my own poem and I wrote: "It is seen that the 'snub' corresponds to what in hebrew is אם-לא = Ɂim-laɁ - which is quite close to 'Himmler'. Is that the story - this imprint on the surface of the planet Mars?"

In the evening I wrote the brief comment from 10-11 may 2025 and as I was about to close the computer around midnight, the following image came up as the background screen of my computer:

It is possible that this was a mock comment (the squeezing of a pimple on the cheek [source] as the dominating image on the planet Mars) on my own private writings earlier in the day - telling that "your private work is more or less online for the whole world" - as a mock telling that it is 'nazi madonna' which has the priority, not you. Is that the 'Microsoft' from 1984 - the 'jawdropping' etc? It is rather urgent with a thorough dishwashing in very many parts of the society on these matters. Clearly such an image as yesterday (or soon after midnight today) - if this image came up on many computer screens and it was motivated by what I worked with earlier in the day) would make it easier to get agents of nazi intelligence organizations into leading positions in many part of the society. Isnt something going to happen with this problem? It looks like plagiarisms of my work are dominating the public interface - for thereby creating the effect that when my 'success' or 'career' thereby is going down, then Hitler's (and his comrades') career is going up. Could be those who organize these mocks are out for hampering the reception of my recent article on Aristotle (published on 11 april 2025) - since that otherwise could lead to a solution to these problems.

I could not store or make a screenshot of the background image on my computer but I took the photo with my pocket camera. No sooner had I taken it, the image disappeared from the computer screen and another came up instead. Had they recorded even that I had taken the photo with my camera?

12 may 2025:

'Robert Allen Zimmermann' is the birth identity of Bob Dylan. 'Robert Francis Prevost' is the name of the new pope. 'Robert Zimmermann' was probably the name of the teacher ('Zimmermann' certainly, 'Robert' probably, or maybe something equivalent) who threw me out the school door in 1970 or 1971 at Trosvik school - because I was right. He was unprepared standin teacher and we should see film - we had been there in the previous lesson with another teacher and when he said 'everybody go get chairs in the room next door' - I said 'it is not necessary, there are many chairs in the film room'. He repeated the instruction and students came already carrying chairs in great numbers when I repeated it while he fumbled with the keys for the door - when it opened the room was full of chairs and he lost his temper, grabbed my neck and pushed my head down to hip height and led me down a long corridor (I peed in my pants on the way) and threw me out the door which slammed shut behind me. I have guessed that it could have been taken to mean that I had no choice but 'auto-fellatio' ('self-sucking'), which also could be recognized in the name of 'Knut Hermundstad Aukrust' = 'knot here-mouth-sta[n]d/erection/stubborn dead-krust'. An R/N rewrite of this name is 'krut hen-murd-sta dau-knust' = 'gunpowder pointing/directed-murd-stubborn/stand/erection dead-crushed'.

* * *

I have fancied that there can have been some very deplorable cases of young attractive women having been 'taken' to a tragic fate and replaced with copies. What would have been the reason? Probably nothing but that single thing that they were spiritually interested and that they were not primarily interested in sex. That is not possible, say those who do it - of course they are primarily out for sex. What else? [...] The phenomenon can perhaps be compared with the concept of 'male chauvinism' that was en vogue a century ago or so.

The fact is probably that nobody likes sex (since it is an insult that probably always is exploitative and can give your 'partner' serious problems with getting into heaven - that isnt very nice of you) and that it is a heavy sacrifice for making children.

If a 'Black Sea Loop' has been in the planning, it could probably have been for similar 'chauvinistic' and exploitative reasons.

See continuation to this under 14 may 2025.

13 may 2025:

On 14 july 2014 I was in the "Chiesa di Santa Maria dei Servi" in Padova and discovered that an artwork there by 'R.Maluta' resembled in its philosophy my poem 'The Endmorgan' which now is on the front page of my homepage. I dont think I mentioned this for anybody or even wrote it anywhere but it certainly was in my mind and I may also have looked the poem up on my computer or in my book, I would guess. On 17 july 2014, three days later, I was back for a closer look and decided to take a photo of it but had no camera - or I think maybe the battery was empty - but there was a photo shop that would open after lunch at 15:00 local time (13:00 UTC) and I could buy the needed equipment for a photo there. I strolled around and waited for the shop to open and I think there was another customer there before me. After I had got what I needed I went back to the church and took the photo. Later in the day or the next day there came the news of the shootdown of a civilian airplane only very short time (a few minutes at most) after I had taken the photo - or could it even have been at the same time? Russia was blamed for it - I don't know what the factual story was - but it is natural to speculate that it was the 'nazi' intrigue that wanted to prevent any progress in my work that could lead to a higher esteem of it and who hoped to credit a 'nazi madonna of the servizi' (cp the location in "Chiesa di Santa Maria dei Servi"). Now TASS reports renewed attention to it and mentions that 'Igor Strelkov and his subordinates Sergey Dubinsky, Oleg Pulatov and Leonid Kharchenko' had been sentenced for the shootdown. I notice the onsets of these names Dubinsky-Strelkov-Kharchenko-Pulatov on the combined form 'du bist wreck of Pulatov' - which could mean that if - as tells the hypothesis which seems to conform to a mythological complex up and going in e.g. cases such as this - I had been raped ('2') in drugged condition in my puberty, on the background perhaps even of raw child abuse in my earliest years ('1-2-3'), for a combined 1-2-2-3, the idea could have been that I would be such a wreck (like the airplane) from all that 'pulatov' - that I could not have written this 'Endmorgan Quartet'. (Such an interpretation of the name 'Pulatov' could also have been associated with the name of Vladimir Lenin/Putin). Hence it could, tells this terrorist idea which is not my logic, have been written e.g. by a 'nazi madonna' or somebody else under the control of the 'services' who could have organized the abuse.

Since I had not pronounced any explicit ideas on the relation between the artwork and my poem, how could they have known about it - if that were the reason for the shootdown? Or had they simply 'shot from this hip' as soon as I had photographed the artwork in the church? It would probably have taken some time to organize it - and this could perhaps have served as yet another example of possible abuse of 'cognitive surveillance data' (that they had tapped my thoughts about this artwork relative to my poem) - once again connected to Ukraine.

It is not probable that it was Russia, this means. It is likely to have been organized (requested) by somebody who would associate my activities with terrorist interests and who could be pretending that my activities would have been of an 'agent' kind which also could mean that they (some 'services') could have hoped to claim that my work could have been written by one of their agents. I am not an agent and have never been and never will be.

By the way, 'Nearly George' sounds perhaps not so unsimilar to 'Nelly Sachs'. There is also a '[sic]' in the poem which I today recognize in the 'SEC'/'ziqq' of this comment - and hence there could be overlapping interests perhaps also with those could have organized the tragic earthquake of Port-au-Prince in january 2010 - if, once again, such earthquakes can be manmade. Would that correlate also with interests of a 'nazi madonna' intrigue? Is this relevant to the concerns of NATO? I do not in any way support a 'nazi madonna' program.

It is easy to see how it is likely that the shootdown could have been organized by western 'nazi' interests out for couping my work (and for hampering the progress of my career or 'recognition' generally - it could be the same interests who are out for labelling all my work as 'wortless excrements' generally) and for dumping the blame for the shootdown on Russia.

This story tells also how important it can be to bring the possible truth of child abuse of me to the surface.

Having completed this brief comment and reading over it again, I check the links and suddenly this comment from 5 may 2025 does not come up. But it was here a few minutes ago? The file had in fact been deleted ('shot down'?) from my computer and even from the installed backup storage card where I have security backups - but I cannot have done that? By coincidental accident? I found it luckily again in the recycle bin. It looks as if it had been 'shot down' by hackers, this means - while I wrote this brief comment in the course of some minutes, maybe half an hour or so. There had been some problems with the present file which I happened to delete (just a 'delete' which happened after a coincidental 'control A' - but it was easy to find that again) during writing but easily restored - but I dont think that comment from 5 may 2025 could have been lost thereby. Today is, though, Fatima day when the pope was shot on St.Peter's Square in 1981 - so maybe there could have been a virus on the computer 'shooting' a file of relevant may date?

PS As I mentioned on 10 may, I got the book 'Foraaret i Mikropolis' by Hans E.Kinck from Knut Hermundstad Aukrust (and probably also his then wife, my elder sister). In view of the other name of Igor Strelkov, which is Igor Girkin, I can tell that I also got another book from them at another occasion - 'Kjærka' (means 'Kirka' = 'the church', with strangely oral vocalic form) by probably Herman Colditz (I remember the title but cannot find the book again). He seems to have published only one book.

It seems that the Netherlands and Australia have been involved in a dispute on the crash since at least june 2024. It can be noticed that if 'Netherlands+Australia' is taken to mean 'down+out', it comes close to the name of the author 'Colditz' (in the sense of 'cold ditch')

I published the above at 6:51 UTC. Then at 10:07 UTC there was a 4.4 earthquake in the harbour at Campi Flegrei near Napoli. See also this reference. The quake was preceded by another quake a few seconds earlier and a third quake at 12:23 local time. Would all this sound like probable coincidences? I had referred to the '1223' above. It is seen that the location in Campi Flegrei at Napoli resembles the locations of the great explosions in the harbour of Beirut and more recently in the harbour of Bandar Abbas. The interval between the publication of my above comment and the earthquake was 3:16. I look up John 3:16 which tells that God gave his son because he loved the world ('kosmos'). I dont know what sort of plans 'God' could have for the time being but I am not interested in an injection of chemicals of type Beirut or Bandar Abbas explosion. Isnt it soon time that the world comes to its senses and gets this story about Hitler out? All this quasi-'divine' Hitler is not the future, and to dump the blame on Russia is not the solution either. But if Europe cannot let it be to blame Russia, is that because a military weapon exists which can lay any city in ruins in the course of few seconds? Such as Port-au-Prince, for example - and how is that today? So what about St.Peter's Cathedral etc? Or is the real reason that Russia is militarily stronger than NATO? If such an earthquake generator exists, it may be a high secret but probably not something which only one country controls. I am not a 'beast of terror' and it was not me who generated earthquakes in Italy today, even if I wrote something about 1223 etc.

* * *

The new 'father' who called himself 'John Grøver' since 1969 told me in probably 1971 or maybe 1972 a mnemotechnic for some latin terms for the bones in the hand - the 8 socalled 'carpal' bones (derived from greek καρπóς - not 'kosmos', though - meaning "wrist") - in the 'root' of the hand: Scaphoid, Lunate, Triquetrum, Pisiform - Trapezium, Trapezoid, Capitate, Hamate were mnemotechnically rehearsed by the formula 'når ludder trenger penger - må menn kapitulere hurtig' = 'when prostitute needs money - must men capitulate quickly'. Would this be 'Bandar Abbas' and 'Beirut' be about the bones in the root of the hand? Clearly there could be associations also to the story of '1223': It may have been some time before my first sexual experiences in the forest outskirts (and I now can observe that the name of the girl I met there would somewhat resemble this mnemotechnic trick). There could perhaps even be associations to the photo I took on 8 may 2025 - with 1) the 'TV'-watcher, 2) the 'bra' = 'BH'-watcher and 3) the 'PR'-watcher. This '8' may could have been the reason why the '5' may file disappeared?

14 may 2025:

(Written in extension of the last entry under 12 may 2025).

How can sex lead to problems with getting into heaven? Because the divine is different from our reality and the other gender's reality is different and therefore sex can make the body believe that it is the road to heaven. That this can be a serious problem is verified by the fact that the first experience with sex was amazingly uninteresting, and if it soon gained interest that was because the confusion had already started. Therefore offering sex also necessarily leads to bad conscience and loss of self esteem/respect, and if this is difficult to understand for the own body and the society encourages sex, it can also lead to social problems by projection of bad conscience (guilt) onto others, a projection which can be consolidated by way of persecution of those others due to their reasons for the guilt, and thereby the whole reality can be difficult to understand - a condition which then can be unfortunately mixed up with the problems of understanding the divine - or more generally difficulties with understanding what is beyond the human reality. The new computer episteme will probably be concerned with understanding technologically more than now of what is beyond the human reality (that is, mystic inquiry will become a part of the foundations for the field of 'informatics') and then this jungle of problems will be an obstacle that must be solved before the new informatics can progress. Why is sex more confusing than other activities? Because it is concerned with an organ which is a part of the integrity of the body and involves another individual.

Marriage exists in all cultures for ensuring the rights of the children conceived in the marital conjunction. Extramarital sex was not permitted because it led to social confusion for just such reasons. Royal monarchy is based on genetic inheritance and if the monarch or his wife is infertile there comes a 'republican' aspect into the power. When Henry VIII broke with the Vatican and made himself the head of the new anglican church, were that because he wanted to procreate with another woman - say, for ensuring the continuation of the power? When he beheaded several of his wives, were that because of such inherent projection problems? This problem could tell of why royal monarchy probably is on its way out. If the present times are concerned also with semiotic irregularities in attachment, is that something which concerns this role of the royal inheritance? Of course if I should be a 'PTRSIM PIK' in the sense of a genetic Stammbaum engineered to look like a Messiah function from the old to the new testament, I do not want to become a target of projection of problems ('dumpingplace', 'zweite Reich'?) for England or anybody else.

Such a 'dumpingplace' does, though, resemble the phenomenon that PTRSIM PIK (via the principle of words occurring twice and only twice in a book of the old testament, such as Genesis) is constructed just like the fundamental theorem of linguistics and thereby the royal body will have access to the transcendent arbitrarity via his or her own body. That includes the gender organ which thereby can take the function of encoding the 'transcendent arbitrarity' (since it is distributed over two genders and hence 'half' of it is in another body) - something which thereby could serve to elevate the problems of sex onto an apparent solution (which is maintained in the principle of power inheritance). It is possible that this is a phenomenon shared with materialism - that it is assumed that the transcendent arbitrarity (the suppression of which can lead to exploitation) can be lifted from the metaphysics and be recognized in the physics and thereby be rescued. Would this mean that the catholic church is found in the intersection between the equinumerous China (the 'same' number of members) and the equi-christian England? Interesting it could be to notice that the fundamental theorem of logic seems to be what creates semantics by the problem of unattainable equiprobability in the historic reality lifted over onto equiprobability of meaning in each occurrence of a word - and this semantics is conceived as 'the same' as the semantics of the immanent arbitrarity in the fundamental theorem of linguistics. Is it the same semantics? Can the transcendent arbitrarity be recognized in the physics? Are these two questions 'the same'? Probably not - but the limited human mind can pretend that they are 'the same' and thereby obtain a feeling of coming to grips with the historic reality. It is possible that this is applied also to an understanding of the intersection between syntagm and paradigm, and/or diachrony and synchrony.

However, having opinions on this matter is perhaps not so easy and one probably thrives better without any particular ideas about it.

15 may 2025:

As to the question whether popes could have been forced to accept agency, there is the theory that those who could want to construct a nazi religion could be in need of a confirmation from the pope's special relation to God that his son lives on the earth. If that were supposed to be me, it follows that in case the man who called himself 'John Grøver' from 1969 were Adolf Hitler, that could count as the father and hence God. However, since he was not the real father, probably not even the second-real father, since my genetic father seems to have been Paul Celan (a jew in a possible PTRSIM PIK construction), his son must be somebody else than me. In case papacy should be under the pressure of accepting agency conditions, cp. e.g. the 2010 earthquakes of Haiti or the recent quakes of Napoli, the aim of this could be to get divinity under political control. Of course I do not support any such ideas of a nazi religion. I am a normal human being. I am not an agent.

Why do I not get account printouts from the hungarian bank (OTP) - only (sometimes) an annual or so report in the post on my account balance accompanied by a lot of papers wherein I am prompted for an answer about my residence for tax purposes? Should that mean that somebody has told the bank that I should be an agent? If so, would that have been norwegian authorities? It would be a lie if they try to tell anybody that I should be an agent, for example for them. It could be a fact that they survey my life and work and make use of the data without paying for the work, which they perhaps could have appointed with an agent - but I am not an agent and have never agreed to any use of such surveillance data. Such data could then also have been intended for the construction of a nazi religion. I can get a printout in the bank but for maximum three months back in time, and not for the present month, and the procedure is a little cumbersome with signatures from me and employees etc. (I can also get the balance in a cashpoint). It was for such reasons that I did not notice that the PO Box fee had not been drawn from my bank account at the turn of the year - I had noticed on the balance that a sum had been drawn and I believed it was a quarter of the annual sum and hence that it would happen four times a year, but it later turned out to have been something else. In Austria it is normally not necessary to go to the bank for clarifying an automatic payment via bank, and there could have been some misunderstanding on this point in Hungary where it seems to be necessary. Therefore I asked in the post office by the making of the agreement on automatic payment via the bank whether I also needed to clarify this with the bank, to which they said no. But there could perhaps have been some misunderstandings due to the language. Now I have got a bill (paid today - a minor sum of 1643 HUF) with punitive interests rate 25% for the 38 days delayed payment of the PO Box fee. This should not be taken to turn negations around. I am a normal human being. I am not an agent. It does not help to move the NOT from the one sentence to the other due to a 25% interest rate. But maybe such punitive interest rates by delayed payment is normal in Hungary - I do not know about that.

18 may 2025:

The Eurovision song contest 2025

The socalled 'Eurovision song contest' was held yesterday (on norwegian national day) and Austria won with a song called 'Wasted love' (text here). I naturally speculate if it relates to my PhD dissertation 'A waist of time' (cp. also 'waste of slime'). The song is written by Johannes Pietsch, Teodora Špirić and Thomas Thurner. The song was released on 6 march 2025, the same day as the 6-17 march 2025 massacres against 1700 alawites in Syria started. The song is performed by countertenor Johannes Pietsch.

I completed my PhD dissertation 'A waist of time' in the Tottenham district - in Sherringham Avenue C2 in London - in 1997 where I lived in a small studio flat which one day when I came home found to have been flooded with wastewater from above - probably from a shower or bathtub maybe. See this file including this photo of the ceiling. The belt in the drawer admittedly could look like 'a waste of slough'. My belongings were rather soaked through with the wastewater but the laptop computer whereon I had written the dissertation luckily survived. I do not remember if the leak were before or after I had completed the dissertation - it is likely that it could have been after I had returned from Bergen around probably 5-10 december 1997 - and I had to either let the workers in for some days or weeks or move elsewhere - I so did in late 1997 or more probably early 1998. But I recall that there were two leaks with some time's interval and therefore it is also possible that the first leak was before I left for Bergen. I put the title 'A waist of time' (which had nothing to do with that wastewater, of course) on the fifth and concluding part not so long before I left for handing it in to the university in Bergen in the beginning of december 1997. When I wrote it, I also made some 'writing' or 'curling' movement with the hand in the air as for 'explaining' what it were about - which could concern articulatorily or motion related knowledge. If this were surveyed, it could be the secret of administrative tricks. (I have still not been informed about any surveillance but have suspected that there could have been abuse of surveillance data from my life and work - it is very important that the police start tidying up in such abuse - democracy is essentially based on an independent executive power and the police must not listen to talk from administration of how valuable this could be for the society or even for me). I notice the text of the song: "I reach out my hand / But you watch me grow distant / Drift out to the sea and / Far away in an instant". Would the lines also allude to my SNEEFT COEIL chapter 'Ich ginge aus zu Breleon' #29? There was recently a new pope in the Vatican - for the catholic church equinumerous to China. "Drift out to the sea and / Far away in an instant" could then be seen as relevant to my 'Der Seemann' with the lines "In wenig' Stunden wird das Schiff / den Hafen hinterlassen, / in offene See stechen". (There was recently a large blackout in Spain and France - the socalled 'Baskerland'). There seemed to be quite massive attacks on these few lines of mine for a while - could be because they contained material of poetic value and summed up the ten first poems (on the human senses - hence the poetic effect). Administration seems to attack poetry - of course my poem is not about blinding the eye with a sharp tool - on the contrary it is about going out into the open sea. The Eurovision song continues: "You left me in the deep end / I'm drownin' in my feelings / How do you not see that?" which then could serve to turn the roles - as if I were on the upper floor of Tottenham and the singing subject were on the lower. When the Grøver family was for a trip to London in (probably) the summer 1972, we lived in a hotel in probably the Bayswater (not the Wastewater - but cp. the 'Bayesian' yacht sinking last summer) district. I think I read in 'Morgunblaðið' some months ago that an icelandic (former president, was it?) who lived in London had the flat flooded with water from above. The austrian song seems to have been launched in the TV competition between the english and the icelandic ones. Were there turks living on the floor above in Tottenham? "...in the deep end": I once bought a DVD with a film called 'The deep end' (which I still have not seen) because I wondered if it were a plagiarisms on my "A deep ratch". (But I made this film analysis). The austrian singer is called 'Pietsch' - which could make "A deep ratch" invoke associations to 'a rape of ditch' - or simpy 'Cold ditch'? The cover to the single (source) suggests an upside-down of the 'P' and 'd'?

The song seems to be about letting the water go - which could be an ejaculation of sperm/semen. I notice the story from the train trip to Budapest more than a decade ago - when the female sitting next to me lifted a foot up on a low 'ledge' as we passed probably 'Biathorbagy' and I spontaneously ejaculated in the underpants. (See also the 'doctor bag' mentioned in the brief comments on 7 may 2025). Comparing with the 'PO Box' of various other contexts, a 'Bi-athor-bagy' relates to a 'Pi-O-box' with an 'athor/o' and hence 'Adoll Fitler' turns into 'O-Fitler' or simply 'Off Hitler'. (The Challenger space shuttle disaster in 1986 was, if I remember right, in the german account said to have been because of a leak in an 'O-Dichtung' - I recall 'Grøver' mentioning Goethe's 'Dichtung und Wahrheit': 'Var heit' is nynorsk for 'was hot' and hence 'dicthung' is stuffing it into it - and letting it go). Would the ejaculation mean 'off Hitler'? I am not Hitler - and Hitler has not written my 'Dichtung' - and one can understand that if Hitler were an agent for England, they could feel the need for getting a public recognition of such an attachment thereto off.

In short, this Eurovision song contest looks as normal like a catastrophe for me - as if it were to launch the program of getting me in the 'cold ditch', accompanied by the massacre in Syria, blackout in Spain/France etc. If so, the catastrophe is that the authorities just let the plagiarisms continue unhindered and pretend that they do not understand and do not know. See this recent observation - if it were a plagiarism, of course the authorities would know it completely well. It seems to be the most read or at least sold author in Germany for the time being. Do they leave it up to me to 'launch claims of plagiarism' by way of a lawyer and then either lose or win? And that should be what stops the third world war - or let it go? That is not responsible administration. The dimensions of the plagiarisms - which seem to be a floodwave much worse than the song refers to - could be so gigantic that it could be a major political concern - and certainly a workfield for the police anyhow. Have my life and work become a 'Wissenschaft' for the entertainment industry and other activities in society? It may be extremely urgent that the world starts tidying up in the problem of plagiarisms of my literary work - otherwise it could end in wars much worse that in Ukraine.

'How could it happen again?' It was easy to stop it this time as well - by investigating potential plagiarisms and stopping those that are found to be - that seem to lead to disasters in terms of wars and terror and diseases.

25 may 2025:

An article today called 'The two reasons' - about two possible reasons for many things - such as the state formation of Norway in 1814.

I have also recently made some interesting studies of my poetry relative to the 'semiotics' of the Himalayas: See this on TEQ #463-462 and this on TEQ #461 - with this comment on an aristotelian aspect therein.

26 may 2025:

A 5,4 earthquake at Hokkaido on 2025-05-22 at 21:28:01.8 UTC. It was 23 km off Urakawa which is a name written with the characters 浦河町 which can be interpreted 'Pu-he-ting' = 'riverbank raised-path-between-field'. (The 'Puheting' must not be confused with the norwegian parliament called 'Storting' = 'Bigthing'). The name sounds like a paradox of a conversion of the downsloping banks of a river plus the upsloping sides of a raised path between fields - that is, if it be about a paradox called water vs earth. Norwegian 'or[d]-a-kava/kaffe' can also be called 'spå i grut' - for divinations perhaps akin to the use of the oracle bone script in ancient China - see my study of some oracle bone script signs.

The morning 25 may 2025 my bicycle back tyre was flat. It could be pumped up again and then it held the air. (Should it mean that I had 'farted', or would it be about the shooter in Washington who 'did it for Gaza'?) A little twig had inserted itself into the nave two days ago when I last used it and the theoretic possibility exists that this little twig could have come in contact with the valvecap and detached it - this sounds improbable but if this were not the reason, the deflation must have been made by some intruder. Hobby, OBI, Hokkaido, Okkaido? However, this morning it was nearly flat so either there is a small hole in it which takes 12 hours or more to deflate or it has happened again. I should take the chance on a small hole.

Drone attack emptying paint on russian embassy in Stockholm in the night to yesterday 25 may 2025. For the concept of the element 'fire'?

Conclusion: The four classic elements. Japan is the other side of Norway, and so is Sweden as well. If the 'drönare' in Sweden were supposed to mean me qua Ukraine (the chief doctor of the psychiatric department where I was detained in 1999-2000 was called 'Drønen'), the turnaround of the 'Urakawa' = 浦河町 = 'Pu-he-ting' = 'riverbank raised-path-between-field' could serve to turn the elements around - which could mean turning the 1000+1000 = 2000 prisoners or war exchanged between Russia and Ukraine around? Or making for an identity with me and Ukraine? Or should it mean my adobe house in Szolnok? Or that I had battled 'windmills'? Norwegian for 'feature' is 'trekk' (noun) which also can mean 'pull' (verb) such as about 'pulling a gun'. 'Trekk' as verb would be imperative.

29 may 2025:

Yesterday there was a landslide from a glacier above the village Blatten in Switzerland that collapsed and buried the village to 90 percent, and the rest has been filled with water that accumulated from the river Lonza that runs through the valley. The village is only 12 km from the grave of Rilke in Raron. He wrote about "Das Lamm mit dem redenden Blatt" - see comment in this article.

30/5-25: In my poem 27 there is the line 'a something afterwards' - this should have been 'a something etterpå'. It corresponds to Rilke's 'Und wie zergings unter allen den gehenden Leuten'. This poem of mine was written two days after the current (website) front page poem "The Endmorgan".

30 may 2025:

Is the storytelling in this video (probably 1999) from an archeological excavation of a 'prince of Kazakhztan' an example of 'nazi madonna' mythology and propaganda? I think 'han sprekker pølser' for 'sprechen Sie deutsch?' used to refer to maybe Hitler or german nazis. The Gravrøvers had gone through several 'holyhorses' (holocausts?) (screenshot from video at 05:47) etc. The film tells that the prince had been in bed with the mother - hence the wife of 'Hitler'? Is 'Hitler' driven by a quest for truth?

It is extremely important that such a potentially nazi mythology - which could be blossoming in media (would the Eurovision Song Contest be an example?) or administrative organizations (such as NATO?) be not allowed to develop into a fullfledged ('post-anglican'?) religion - as could have been the plan of Hitler and his comrades for a 'dritte Reich'.

The video could also be documenting a case of possible vandalism - since (although that was perhaps not known in 1999) such a preserved tomb should probably not have been opened before it had been scanned with hypersolution - say, the scanner running for weeks for documenting down to nearly molecule level for storing enormous masses of scan info that can be used for later reconstruction by computer: This could have revealed an emormous lot of the lives of those times, could be even their language and thoughts - their reality. Digging with spades and carrying the objects out destroys these chances for ever. Is that for a vandalism of the 'nazi madonna' mythology? But maybe they had scanned it in time.

The scientists in the documentary are probably serious and not nazi, though.

It was in 1998 that my PhD dissertation was rejected around the time when 'state-power' (former PM) Gro Harlem Brundtland was appointed chief of WHO and in 1999 I was driven to forced psychiatric treatment which, when I was released in 2000, forced me to flee the country.

If the mythos underneath the video documentary tells that I had been in bed with 'Hitler's wife (hypothetically assumed to be rapes of me in drugged condition while breathing through a cloth soaked in menstrual blood as, the hypothesis would tell, for role-turning purposes in my subconscious mind) and therefore 'Hitler's quest for truth could come to bring him to the conclusion that he has to take the jewish genetics once again, albeit wrapped in new clothing. (I do not have much empirical basis for these theories on drugged rapes, though).